Slashdot Mirror


Repeal of Louisiana Science Education Act Rejected

egjertse writes "A Louisiana law that opponents say leaves the backdoor open to teaching 'creationism' in public schools will stay on the books after a Senate committee Wednesday effectively killed a bill that would repeal the statute. After hours of testimony for and against House Bill 26, which repeals the 2008 Louisiana Science Education Act, the senators narrowly deferred the legislation, effectively killing it in committee. The bill was sponsored by Sen. Karen Carter Peterson, D-New Orleans."

37 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. And then there's this asshole: by Threni · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sen. Elbert Guillory, D-Opelousas, said he had reservations with repealing the act after a spiritual healer correctly diagnosed a specific medical ailment he had. He said he thought repealing the act could "lock the door on being able to view ideas from many places, concepts from many cultures."

    "Yet if I closed my mind when I saw this man -- in the dust, throwing some bones on the ground, semi-clothed -- if I had closed him off and just said, 'That's not science. I'm not going to see this doctor,' I would have shut off a very good experience for myself," Guillory said.

    1. Re:And then there's this asshole: by kruach+aum · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh my god. And you have to live in a country like that.

    2. Re: And then there's this asshole: by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not "other ideas" just utter bullshit.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    3. Re: And then there's this asshole: by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Close minded towards precisely the kind of fuzzy thinking based on anecdotal evidence that science was designed to avoid? Yes, I think sensible should be.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:And then there's this asshole: by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Politicians are perfectly rational. They do and say exactly what it takes to get themselves re-elected. Whether or not this man believes a word of what he said, he knows full well which side his bread is buttered on.

    5. Re:And then there's this asshole: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sen. Elbert Guillory, D-Opelousas, said he had reservations with repealing the act after a spiritual healer correctly diagnosed a specific medical ailment he had.

      Like it was that hard to diagnose Cranial Colon Envelopment in a politician. He probably ran into her right outside the Asshat Haberdashery (a dead giveaway).

    6. Re: And then there's this asshole: by Bosconian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hey AC,

      Please watch this YouTube video; it may be the best 9:40 you'll invest in the inexorably slow building of your critical thinking discipline.

      Open-mindedness by QualiaSoup

      --
      Scarce, scared, scarred, sacred... -Col. Bruce Hampton
    7. Re:And then there's this asshole: by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's more the career beaurocrat track, but whatever, my point is that there was never a stupid and successful politican. Don't kid yourselves, these guys are slick fish, and it suits them just fine to let people believe they are stupid. Even the most celebrated of the ignorant politicians, GW Bush, famed for his consistent foreign policy gaffes, knew full well that his constituency didn't give one fuck about offended foreigners or their customs. The problem doesn't lie with the politicians, they're just working the system and the electorate.

    8. Re:And then there's this asshole: by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What countries are not like that? You will find those people everywhere, don't be smug and assume they're not where you live.

    9. Re: And then there's this asshole: by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Informative

      Open mindedness is not the same thing as tolerance of baseless claims.

    10. Re: And then there's this asshole: by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Welcome to Louisiana, where both science and education are endangered species...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    11. Re:And then there's this asshole: by jamstar7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as they vote the way their consituents want them to, I think they are effectively doing their job correctly. It's only when they take corporate money, and don't listen to the people that they are doing it wrong.

      The problem is, their constituents are corporations, not meat citizens.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    12. Re:And then there's this asshole: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, those people are widespread in many countries, but they usually don't run them.

    13. Re:And then there's this asshole: by tehcyder · · Score: 5, Funny

      I noticed that particular passage, too. One of the things that bothered me about his "decision making" is that spiritual healer is not the opposite of evolution or science. I can't remember a single science or math class where spiritual healers came up even once. I don't recall any lesson about how species evolve including, "therefore, spiritual healers suck". Moreover, "That's not science. I'm not going to see this doctor." Who does that? I would have been driven off by the "semi-clothed" aspect, but the its not science would have never crossed my mind.

      Moreover, if it worked, I would want to "use my science" to learn more about it and figure out how it works. If I just accept that it was magic, I would close my mind to learning.

      That's a pretty bold statement.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  2. Why? by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are we allowing people who aren't smart enough to decide what's best for children do just that? Why aren't we re-thinking how our government operates to prevent this from happening again?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Why? by dyingtolive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What metrics do you use for determining when people are smart enough and when they aren't? I'm afraid I'm not smart enough to come up with any that don't create massive abuses.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    2. Re:Why? by jfengel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Democracy. Rule by the people, half of whom have IQs in the double-digit range.

      Or, as Mencken put it even better: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."

    3. Re:Why? by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, we have democracy whenever it suits the interests of a tiny power elite. If "the people" really ruled by democracy, we'd be entangled in a lot less foreign wars, have much lower disparity in wealth distribution, no big push for austerity, no too-big-to-fail bank bailouts, etc. As it is, we get stupid crowd-pleasers like nods toward eliminating separation of church and state, but not any democratically favored changes that oppose the oligarchy.

    4. Re: Why? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Informative

      In the Dover case the school board voted to have a disclaimer read before the biology class about how "Evolution was just a theory" and have an Intelligent Design textbook available. When asked later why the board members said they were following the advice of a conservative outside group. The judge noted in the judgement that the board never consulted any national or professional science groups and ignored the very vocal protests of their only experts, their science teachers.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Why? by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Democracy looks like Proposition 8. Majority gets what it wants, even if it means a minority is oppressed. You're suggesting the very thing in your own little fantasy. The wealthy are a minority, so we'll just vote to take their money make everybody poor. That won't destroy the economy or anything.

      Not only that, but you're extremely naive if you think that most people want what you want. You'd get a very rude awakening if a real democracy were put in place, North Africa is learning that the hard way right now. The urban liberals in Egypt thought that democracy would make things better, but they're learning that what the majority wants is in fact a society based on oppressive religious conservatism. Large groups of people are ruled brutally by the bell curve. They are of average intellect and average wisdom, and in a place where averages are lower, so goes the entire effect. And as Polybius and contemporaries documented long ago, such simplistic political forms fall inevitably into ochlochcracy. Study history.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    6. Re:Why? by femtobyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Democracy looks like Proposition 8. Majority gets what it wants, even if it means a minority is oppressed.

      Yep. And it also looks like the democratic movements to create marriage equality in many other states (despite gays being just as much a minority). You win some, you lose some. I haven't particularly seen our antidemocratic overlords stepping up for marriage equality against popular opinion, either.

      The wealthy are a minority, so we'll just vote to take their money make everybody poor.

      Yeah, it's so important to protect that minority, that we'd better put them in control of who gets rich and who gets poor. What's that? The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer? What a shocker!

      And as Polybius and contemporaries documented long ago, such simplistic political forms fall inevitably into ochlochcracy.

      Right, because democracy can only take the most simplistic strawman forms, and the ancient Greeks were the final word on all political science. Better to stay safe with oligarchy.

    7. Re: Why? by femtobyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whereas evolution has not been revised since it was proposed by Darwin.

      This is blatantly wrong. Our understanding of evolution, like our understanding of gravity, has been immensely refined and elaborated since Darwin's time. Perhaps the most radical addition was the discovery of genetics --- a physical mechanism for inheritance of traits and production of variability unknown in Darwin's time. We've now got a huge array of tools to produce a far more detailed and comprehensive evolutionary model, quantitatively answering a huge number of questions left open by Darwin, while posing new ones.

    8. Re: Why? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whereas evolution has not been revised since it was proposed by Darwin.

      I hereby nominate UnknowingFool for "most appropriate Slashdot user name of the year."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Why? by meglon · · Score: 4, Informative

      This stupid argument.... again. Why is it people can't pass a simple civics class?

      We are a democracy and a republic. We are not a direct democracy, we're a representative democracy, so no.... it's not mob rules, tyranny of the majority (you may be confusing us with Switzerland, or simply be confused for no reason). It can also be called a representative republic, as our president is elected and not a monarch (like in England).

      Whenever this stupid argument comes up, i'm often humored by the split in terminology. Conservatives want to claim loudly we're a republic, not a democracy... somehow i'm guessing that this makes them think republicans are better than democrats... yet when push comes to shove, what conservatives really want is a direct democracy so they can continue the tyranny of the majority against gays getting married, women having the right (or not) to self determine their own medical situations, and pretty much every social issue; after all, "the people should be able to vote on that..." as they tend to say right after a judge throws out their discriminatory laws. THE only reason they think that is because they believe they're in the majority.

      So, back to the stupid argument...yes, we're a republic...and YES, we're a democracy.

      --
      Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  3. Re:History by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative

    PS does anyone know when that "Earth is 6,000 years old" started? I'd like to know how many years I have to add to come up with a more accurate number.

    The name you're looking for is James Ussher, a Calvinist archbishop.

    The specific works where he specified that the date of Creation was the nightfall before 23 OCT 4004 BC (Julian calendar, mind you) were published between 1650 and 1654 (I don't know which of them first used the 4004bc creation time).

    Why so many flavours of Christian seem to be addicted to the writings of a Calvinist archbishop, I've never understood. Most American Christians are, at best, uninspired by Calvinism....

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  4. Re:History by Longjmp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    History is a breeze on these schools... they only go back 6,001 years (to include 2013).

    What puzzles me, or rather amuses me is how many of the people believing in this nonsense are happy to operate their DVD players and/or GPS (among other things) without hesitation;
    - And accept they will work, completely ignoring that those items are based on the same physical laws we determine the age of earth with.

    --
    There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
  5. Re:So sue them. by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why? It's their own kids that will suffer.

    Is this the same logic you'd use if you noticed that your neighbor came home stinking drunk and beat his kids every night? And, in case caring for the well-being of other peoples' kids is too much of a stretch for you, how about a little self-interest: you own kids are going to grow up to share the world with these guys.

  6. Re:History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because such people do not think about why their GPS works, they expect that it just does as an article of faith. In short, it's magic.

  7. Re:Lesson Learned by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah totally. Also have you ever tried applying critical thought to math class? Those closed-minded teachers won't even consider that Pi might be three. Tell them that's what you believe, and they'll fail you out of sheer bigotry. Man, math must be too weak to expose to differing ideas.

  8. Re:So sue them. by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, I wouldn't use the same logic there. ... See the difference now?

    Yes, I can see that if you are a coward, standing on principle to help others is not part of your logic.

  9. Re:History by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q: How do you keep a Baptist from drinking all your beer when you are fishing?

    A: Invite two.

    They are all 'uninspired by Christ'. The scary ones are convinced they are.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  10. Re:History by Longjmp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can you (or someone else) expand on this? I am not a physicist and am curious as to what you are referring to.

    Ready for a 6 month lesson? ;-)
    First off, DVD players use a laser. Lasers obey to certain rules, it's an interaction between electrons, atom nuclei and photons (light, the laser light).
    We can reliably predict the behavior of those "systems".

    I'll try an example now (to stick with the lettuce).
    Let's assume you are a farmer and are growing lettuce. No you find several heads of lettuce. Some fresh, some with leaves withered, some rotten.
    As a farmer you can determine how long ago the lettuce head was cut.
    Physicists do the same. They know how long lettuce (atoms) need to decay, based on physical laws that make the laser produce light.
    So when you look at a stone, you look at the "withered leaves" and can tell how old it is.

    Hope this makes sense.

    --
    There are fewer illiterates than people who can't read.
  11. Digital code in genes, proof that Jesus rode dinos by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "Discovery Institute", the leading purveyors of pseudo-science hokum to the Far Right, who have somehow become a "think tank" involved in creating science curriculum in more than 25 states, has started a nationwide campaign on right-wing radio programs, pushing their notion that it's the Christian Conservatives who are the "real protectors of science" not those awful secular scientists (who are probably kenyan muslims too).

    I heard their "director of research", a "Dr Stephen Meyer" who wrote a book called Darwinâ(TM)s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design on the radio earlier this week, talking about how the fact that our genes have "digital code" in them is proof of an "intelligent designer" because you can't have things like "circuits and digital code" without someone intelligent to design them.

    I'm not joking, they are spending millions on a PR campaign talking about how the Christian Right are the true lovers of science. And exhibit A is how "the science establishment" still teaches evolution.

    We are so fucked.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. Scratch Louisiana by edibobb · · Score: 5, Funny

    Louisiana is one place I will not consider moving to.

    And, for you grammar Nazis, Louisiana is one place to which I will not consider moving.

    And, for you Cajuns, I ain't gonna go to loosiana no more.

  13. Looks like more work for Zack by Covalent · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zack_Kopplin
    http://www.repealcreationism.com/


    FYI: Zack is a college student who, while a high school student in Louisiana, decided that no one was going to repeal this law while he was in school. He started an organization to try and ensure that Louisiana students could get a proper education.

    Maybe he should run for state senator!

    --
    Great warrior...hrmph! Wars not make one great.
  14. Re:So sue them. by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you don't want your kids exposed to it, put them in private school or move out of state.

    Must be nice to grow up with enough wealth that it doesn't even occur to you that not every fucking person can afford private school or to pull up stakes and move to another state across country (because none of Louisiana's neighbors are any better). My niece is stuck in Louisiana for the foreseeable future, through no fault of her own. Her kids are in public schools because the private schools in her area that are affordable are all Baptist shitholes that are even worse.

    Education should be a local issue.

    Why? So that the children who grow up in Grosse Pointe Shores can get great educations to ensure that they continue to rule unopposed over the children who grow up in Benton Harbor? This was always the whole point of funding schools through local property taxes, so that the rich can forever dominate the poor no matter how intelligent and talented the poor kids might actually be.

    --
    "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  15. Pseudoscience in Louisiana by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pseudoscience is everywhere in Louisiana - a report from the ground.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk