Slashdot Mirror


Russia Captures Alleged American CIA Agent In Moscow

wiredmikey tips this AFP report: "Russia on Tuesday said it had detained an alleged American CIA agent working undercover at the U.S. embassy who was discovered with a large stash of money as he was trying to recruit a Russian intelligence officer. Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB, ex-KGB) identified the man as Ryan C. Fogle — third secretary of the political section of Washington's embassy in Moscow — and said he had been handed back to the embassy after his detention. Photographs published show his alleged espionage equipment including wigs, a compass, torch and even a mundane atlas of Moscow as well as a somewhat old fashioned mobile phone. Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) said Fogle was carrying 'special technical equipment, written instructions for recruiting a Russian citizen, a large sum of money and means for changing a person's appearance.' The FSB also said the U.S. intelligence service has made repeated attempts to recruit the staff of Russian law enforcement agencies and special services. The incident comes amid a new chill in Russian-U.S. relations sparked by the Syrian crisis and concern in Washington over what it sees as President Vladimir Putin's crackdown on human rights."

195 comments

  1. In Soviet Russian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    First post posts YOU!!

  2. Bitcoins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if he would have been secretly paid Bitcoins?

    1. Re:Bitcoins by flyneye · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Union, you don't come from U.S. embassy to buy large amount of hemp from undercover FSB officer, ..dude.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    2. Re:Bitcoins by elucido · · Score: 1

      What if he would have been secretly paid Bitcoins?

      He is the officer. The people he wanted to recruit should have been paid in Bitcoins.

  3. Meh by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Turnabout is fair play.

    How the FBI Busted Anna Chapman and the Russian Spy Ring

    No surprise - Putin has been trying to drag the US - Russian relationship back to Cold War times. He has become much more provocative with military probes around US territory, and has been dismissive of US diplomats. Apparently it plays well in Russia.

    It looks like he is getting his wish. So much for the "reset" in relations.

       

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Meh by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Putin has been trying to drag the US - Russian relationship back to Cold War times

      Yes please, i love the cold war romantic atmosphere.

    2. Re:Meh by BarbambiaKirgudu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's call it CWII.

    3. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes please, i love the cold war romantic atmosphere.

      Protip: Look, but don't touch!

      Sexy russian spy Anna Chapman

    4. Re:Meh by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      Yep, i agree with you, it is better to have Russia as arch-devil, than,....what, North Korea? Don't make me laugh.

    5. Re:Meh by Aaron+B+Lingwood · · Score: 2

      Let's call it CWII.

      We have already had a Second Cold War.

      --
      [Rent This Space]
    6. Re:Meh by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Turnabout is fair play.

      How the FBI Busted Anna Chapman and the Russian Spy Ring

      No surprise - Putin has been trying to drag the US - Russian relationship back to Cold War times. He has become much more provocative with military probes around US territory, and has been dismissive of US diplomats. Apparently it plays well in Russia.

      It looks like he is getting his wish. So much for the "reset" in relations.

       

      This time it will be confusing. Our local policies are reading too much like Russia's local cold war policies.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    7. Re:Meh by BambarbiaKirgudu · · Score: 1

      That was "Second Cold War" / "Second" Cold War.

    8. Re:Meh by BambarbiaKirgudu · · Score: 1

      ColdWar within ColdWar (almost like a Matryoshka Doll) ... Hmm. Would 'nested' or 'recursive' be a better description?

    9. Re:Meh by lesincompetent · · Score: 1

      Yup, a way more credible threat!

    10. Re:Meh by Barefoot+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Now we have a second Second Cold War.

      Let's not fight about it - if the argument itself develops into a cold war we'd have the first Second Second Cold War Cold War, which would be terrible. And you know there'd inevitably be another one after that.

    11. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nested. Computer science fail.

    12. Re: Meh by BarbambiaKirgudu · · Score: 1

      CS was still in infancy back then. Hence, misnomer/misnumbering 'second'.

      Someone should add this explanation to the Wikipedia article.

  4. Amateur by quarterbuck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This spy seems to have all the marks of an made-up-Amateur or a set-up. The guy is wearing a wig, has a hat over it (not dyed hair) even when he is on a diplomatic passport and is openly approaching Russians. Then the Russians have a camera crew and policemen waiting in the street to arrest him and oddly enough he is found to be carrying money, maps and more wigs in his bag. This seems like Americans set-up a honeypot and the Russians jumped on it. Probably the guy had been told already that this is his last assignment in Russia.
    Either that, or the CIA decided to have some fun with a Rookie and set him up with a couple of wigs and told him to go on a "Top Secret Assignment" and the poor slob got caught.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    1. Re:Amateur by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah he sounds a bit like Ben Zygier to be honest.

    2. Re:Amateur by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase can make a movie about it...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure I see the tech angle on this /. story but I find it interesting that he had a plastic bag that says RFID Shielded.

      Here's a picture of the blue RFID bag:
      http://admin.new.rt.com/files/news/1f/11/50/00/48.jpg

    4. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he have a CIA Id with him (or whatever they are supposedly using for identification, with big American eagle on it)? You forgot to mention an instruction how to recruit Russians, just in case he forgets what questions to ask, and an example of a contract to sign.
      He is more like a clown who got lost in a big city.

    5. Re:Amateur by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you, but after watching the movie "Pain & Gain", i tend to disagree with you :D

    6. Re:Amateur by lgw · · Score: 5, Informative

      "Russia on Tuesday said it had detained an alleged American CIA agent working undercover at the U.S. embassy

      This spy seems to have all the marks of an made-up-Amateur or a set-up.

      There are two kinds of CIA employees: "undercover agents" and those who have ever entered a US embassy. This separation is required by US law (after some casualness about this lead to many deaths, IIRC). If you've ever walked into an US embassy, you can never be an undercover agent, simple as that.

      A goodly amount of "spying" is simply being in-country and collecting the local media and the local mood and reporting it back. What the government is telling the people and how the people are reacting. Research into local public records. That sort of non-secret intelligence gathering is still the CIAs job, and is probably what most of their employees abroad do.

      It's also worth remembering that, unlike what movies might have you believe, the undercover agents don't personally "spy" in the sense of sneaking into government buildings and such. They develop relationships with people who are authorized to be in those buildings, or with "freedom fighters" who are shooting at those people, or whatever. Their job is to convince others to do the stuff you'd make a movie about.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or CIA had such success in their recruitment of Russian agents, they needed a dupe to make the FSB feel like their anti-espionage operations are working.

    8. Re:Amateur by SolitaryMan · · Score: 2

      If this was some serious spy, this is not how FSB would have cashed on the catch. This thing would have been quietly dealt with between agencies or they would have just kept an eye on him as on a "known spy" to use for spreading misinformation or something.

      Since he is some entry position diplomat, the only thing this catch is good for, is to get some anti-US outrage inside the country going.

      No biggie, really.

      --
      May Peace Prevail On Earth
    9. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. The unglamorous fact about real-life espionage is that it's a depressingly low-budget business. The CIA tries to avoid publicizing the fact, because it's not a good look when your budget is as big as theirs... but this is exactly the level of equipment used on real missions, more often than not. It wouldn't surprise me if this guy was exactly what the Russians claim he was.

      Big whoop, really. We all know there are hundreds of CIA agents currently in Russia. At least this guy was lucky enough to have a diplomatic stamp in his passport.

    10. Re:Amateur by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're assuming that:
      A. Our federal government isn't totally fucking retarded.
      B. Our federal government follows any of their own rules/laws/policies.
      Both of which have been proven about as false as possible after this past week.
      I've always wondered if our government was actually bad... or just inept boobs. You know, never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence... color me surprised to find out they are both malicious AND incompetent.

    11. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not a spy. He's simply poor bold man, who can't afford a smartphone with Google map. Therefore he has to resort to maps and compass.

      Also interesting wording from AFP "CIA agent working undercover". Do CIA agents work in foreign country not undercover ?

    12. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking EXACTLY the same thing - probably trying to flush out some other individual, mission accomplished

    13. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the CIA's biggest secrets is that not all of them are fucking Jedi masters of spycraft. At the end of the day, they're a pack of government employees, after all.

    14. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Russia on Tuesday said it had detained an alleged American CIA agent working undercover at the U.S. embassy

      This spy seems to have all the marks of an made-up-Amateur or a set-up.

      There are two kinds of CIA employees: "undercover agents" and those who have ever entered a US embassy. This separation is required by US law (after some casualness about this lead to many deaths, IIRC). If you've ever walked into an US embassy, you can never be an undercover agent, simple as that.

      This cannot possibly be true, at least not in the way you've phrased it. This would disqualify from clandestine work anyone who lost their passport as a 14yo high school student in Paris. Perhaps you mean to suggest that clandestine operations are not meant to be run out of the embassy which would be correct and why we set up front companies around the world to replace the functions the embassy once served.

    15. Re:Amateur by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      Also, he was caught with "written instructions for recruiting a Russian citizen"??

    16. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever walked into an US embassy, you can never be an undercover agent, simple as that.

      So all the Russians need to do, is to collect Passport/Visa photos from entry points of Americans entering the Country, and compare it with CCTV from outside the US Embassy, and they can figure out who is likely to be undercover? Seems way too easy.

    17. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As has been pointed out, having this guy get caught looks like deliberate offer to the Russians. So we have to ask ourselves what the CIA / US government plans on achieving by worsening relations with Russia...

      captcha: autonomy

    18. Re:Amateur by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      Beat me to it! He's definitely the decoy GLG-20.

    19. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The US government gets a good excuse for restricting its own people even more since they now have a plausible enemy.

      The CIA gets more funding since they now have a plausible enemy.

    20. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, "Our federal government" employs about 5 million people, so trying to generalize the action of one individual is totally fucking... well, you said it ;)

    21. Re:Amateur by Dahamma · · Score: 2

      There are two kinds of CIA employees: "undercover agents" and those who have ever entered a US embassy. This separation is required by US law (after some casualness about this lead to many deaths, IIRC). If you've ever walked into an US embassy, you can never be an undercover agent, simple as that.

      Sorry, but this is the most ridiculous statement I have read on this thread. If it's public federal law can you provide ANY citation? Should be all over the place but I can't find anything even resembling it...

    22. Re:Amateur by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Plus he's carrying written instructions, which is an incredibly stupid thing, and a compass which is going to be of little use in a city. This stinks of a setup. I don't see what the CIA could gain from this, but I can imagine Russia doing it as a propaganda piece - impersonate a CIA agent, 'recruit' someone, catch him, and announce to your people that the cold war isn't over yet but your superior Russian intelligence agents can still catch the minions of the capitalist pigs, or whatever the current rhetoric is.

    23. Re:Amateur by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Honestly, after the last week of headlines, I'm wondering if there is any other meaningful way that this administration can fuck up, without causing wars or prompt economic disaster.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    24. Re:Amateur by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Well, "Our federal government" employs about 5 million people, so trying to generalize the action of one individual is totally fucking... well, you said it ;)

      What's really going to blow your mind is how many bacteria live in your body. Literally pounds of bacteria colonize a healthy human. If you can't generalize the action of the government based on its aggregate actions, then you can't generalize the action of a single human based on its aggregate actions either.

      But, that's bullshit! You can judge a government by its actions. We've got a welfare system just good enough to keep you in poverty, an economic system leading more people to the welfare system, and a massive military using the majority of funding (count military pensions, please, thank you) to murder people for profit in other countries. We've got laws which criminalize victimless crimes and laws which create victims. Our government is evil. We are The Empire. Still looking for those droids, I guess.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:Amateur by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      This spy seems to have all the marks of an made-up-Amateur or a set-up.

      Yeah, except the U.S. has apparently admitted that this "amateur" was working for the U.S. embassy (though denied he was a spy).

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    26. Re:Amateur by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    27. Re:Amateur by Dr.+Zim · · Score: 1

      I watched that again last weekend. It was as painful as I remembered.

      --
      (name withheld by request)
    28. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really that fucking dense? Why would the CIA need a federal law that defines its hiring criteria? Especially with regards to hiring criteria for secret agent men.

    29. Re:Amateur by deadweight · · Score: 1

      I vote "watched The Americans on FX and was overcome with jealousy at KGB wig success in 1980s" myself. YMMV

    30. Re:Amateur by deadweight · · Score: 1

      The Russians really don't care. If we DIDN'T spy on them it would be the first time since dirt was invented major powers did not spy on each other.

    31. Re:Amateur by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Practical joke on last month at work?

    32. Re:Amateur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad analogy; bacteria are not sentient.

    33. Re:Amateur by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy; bacteria are not sentient.

      It's not even a requirement to vote, so I'm not sure why that's the bar.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Amateur by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Of COURSE the CIA doesn't bother with federal laws for covert hiring, that was my whole POINT, which is why I said "this separation is required by US law" sounded ridiculous and asked for proof (since *if* it's federal *law* either it's public information or the OP secretly knows CIA internal hiring policies, which I doubt even more).

      No worries on you getting hired, though, regardless of what embassies you have visited... you wouldn't even pass their "how many fingers am I holding up" test.

    35. Re:Amateur by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

      My personal addition to this has always been "unless you are discussing the government, in which case assume both."

    36. Re:Amateur by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      No wars or economic disasters? Throw in a lack of blatant civil rights abuse and you might have just set a bar no administration has met since Harrison.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  5. Protip: Leave double agent recruiting manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at home!

    Does not sound like they got Jason Bourne on this one. In the good old days he would have been chopped up and thrown in the Moskva.

    captcha: indolent

  6. So in the absence of official denials... by benjfowler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... is this bloke some kind of amateur Walter Mitty type, or is he for real?

    1. Re:So in the absence of official denials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't matter he's going home on your dollar

  7. When do we get the ... by Kittenman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    tit-for-tat expulsions that usually follow someone (innocent or guilty) getting nabbed? How long before the CIA nab a Russian agent in Washington DC?

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:When do we get the ... by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      technically, it would be up to the FBI to nab a foreign spy in the U.S.

  8. Lopsided war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their spies are hot redheads, ours look like dimwitted fratboys. I can't tell if we're losing or winning.

    1. Re:Lopsided war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their spies are hot redheads, ours look like dimwitted fratboys. I can't tell if we're losing or winning.

      Who do you mean by our spies, comrade?

    2. Re:Lopsided war by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 0

      I heard communists had no souls, but that takes it to a whole new level.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    3. Re:Lopsided war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their spies are hot redheads, ours look like dimwitted fratboys. I can't tell if we're losing or winning.

      Which would YOU rather be recruited by?

    4. Re:Lopsided war by cusco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I realize that was meant to be a frivolous statement, but there's an actual reason for that. The CIA has traditionally recruited from within the 'old boy network' of Ivy League fraternities and secret societies, people whose loyalty to the existing power structure they can pretty much guarantee because they were born into it.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    5. Re:Lopsided war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Russians used 'swallows' (beautiful female operatives trained to use seduction to co-opt an intelligence target), so in a sense they do have an actual tradition of using "hot redheads" as spies.

    6. Re:Lopsided war by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      I realize that was meant to be a frivolous statement, but there's an actual reason for that. The CIA has traditionally recruited from within the 'old boy network' of Ivy League fraternities and secret societies, people whose loyalty to the existing power structure they can pretty much guarantee because they were born into it.

      You might want to ask someone how that can work out.

      The Cambridge spy ring

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:Lopsided war by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Not just women. During the buildup to WWII Martha Dodd, the daughter of the US ambassador to Germany was romantically subourned by one of the young male attache's to the Soviet embassy in Berlin. It turned out he was under orders from Moscow to do so.

      If you think they aren't still doing this kind of thing (even perhaps with same sex relationships), you're kidding yourself.

    8. Re:Lopsided war by deadweight · · Score: 1

      That did not work out very well for MI5 and MI6 back in the day.......just sayin

  9. Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

    Seems that way from the number of comments posted so far.

    1. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The slashdot hivemind, like the rest of the internet, prefers bickering over political, religious, social, and occasionally tech issues over discussing things of long reaching consequences or unusual occurrence. Everything else, no matter how important or newsworthy, is ignored by the vast majority.

    2. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What's to talk about? The remarks about the blindingly amateurish nature of this guy have already been made. Honey pot or patsy, either way, we know damn well that Russians aren't recruited by the American Third Secretary of the embassy who toddles around with a bag full of wigs. Sounds like Putin called up Obama and said, "I need a Big Bad America thing in the news. What can you do for me?" and Obama responded with, "Hey Rob! Who do we not like in the embassy?" and there you go. Or vice versa. Does it really matter?

      In short, we're bored with this story. It's "news" only for particularly lame values of manufactured news. We're so bored with it nobody is even bothering to generate conspiracy theories about this being a calibration test of fake spy stories, to see who reacts and how.

    3. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the news story was on youtube this morning at 9 am, so it is a little late

    4. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Except that this isn't unusual and won't have any long-reaching consequences.

      A better explanation is that the GP hasn't noticed that Slashdot posts slow down around this time of day (GMT).

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you read a bit about the history of the CIA you'll see a lot of blindingly amateurish stuff. They still trust that "polygraph" voodoo which was a scam that came from the guy that wrote the Wonder Woman comic (no I am not joking).

    6. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      You might not be joking but you're wrong. William Marston created wonder woman John Larson invented the polygraph....

    7. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe people don't care much. I don't; it's (failed) boredom fodder. It's less interesting and newsworthy than Ghana catching a Canadian spy.

    8. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting
      From Wikipedia:

      Marston is credited as the creator of the systolic blood pressure test, which became one component of the modern polygraph invented by John Augustus Larson in Berkeley,

      It's annoying when people don't check their facts before they rush in to "correct" you on this site. Somebody please mod that AC back down.

    9. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by deadweight · · Score: 2

      Writing a comic really has no bearing on this person's other abilities. A movie actress invented spread spectrum, so there ya go! (not to say the polygraph isn't a pice of shit - it is. All it tells you is if the subject is nervous)

    10. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that the systolic blood pressure test is used for more than just polygraph exams right?

    11. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by dbIII · · Score: 1

      My point is really that it's a piece of shit from an unreliable source sold to J.Edgar Hoover back when he was on the take and they STILL use it despite the rest of the world laughing.

    12. Re:Maybe the FSB has silenced this site by dbIII · · Score: 1

      How does that change the problem that the CIA still use shit like polygraphs while the rest of the world laughs at them doing it?

  10. From Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call this mission improbable

  11. yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    concern in Washington over what it sees as President Vladimir Putin's crackdown on human rights."

    Coming from the US with its imprisoning of more people (by absolute numbers and percentage of population) than any other country in the world. Indefinite detention, torture, summary execution. Yeah. The US has credibility when it comes to human rights.

    1. Re:yeah. by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Yes, GITMO etc removes the moral high ground, but that doesn't change things like a difficult journalist getting assassinated as a present for Putin's birthday last year.

    2. Re:yeah. by cusco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they were actually considered POWs they would have to be accorded certain treatments, like visits from the Red Cross, decent treatment, freedom from torture, notification of their detention to family, and the like. Instead the Shrub Madministration invented a new and completely internationally unrecognized category of "illegal combatant" and pretended as though the Geneva Conventions don't apply to them. Even worse, the current administration continues with the farce, even though they acknowledged that it was actually illegal.

      How blinded are you? What do you think the purpose of the Black Sites is, lovely vacation sites? You're too late, the previous administration would have paid you for posting nonsense like this, I think this one just relies on volunteers.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    3. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      The POWs in Guantanamo do get Red Cross visits. As to the rest of their status - in order to receive the full protection of the Geneva Convention as a combatant you have to obey the Law of War. Al Qaida doesn't do that, quite the reverse. Their basic strategy of directly targeting civilian noncombatants constitutes a war crime. They are quite rightly recognized as unlawful combatants. And do note, it isn't that this categorization is unknown internationally, but rather that various advocates refuse to acknowledge that it exists.

      The black sites? Last time I looked they were for detention and interrogation.

      Now, there are a couple of factors that make these discussions more interesting. First, is the fact that Al Qaida teaches its members to lie about their treatment and not cooperate.

      Al Qaeda Manual Drives Detainee Behavior at Guantanamo Bay

      . . . Police in Manchester, England, discovered the manual, which has come to be known as the "Manchester document," in 2000 while searching computer files found in the home of a known al Qaeda member. The contents were introduced as evidence into the 2001 trial of terrorists who bombed the U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya in 1998. . .

      The closing chapter teaches al Qaeda operatives how to operate in a prison or detention center. It directs detainees to "insist on proving that torture was inflicted" and to "complain of mistreatment while in prison."

      Chapter 17 instructs them to "be careful not to give the enemy any vital information" during interrogations.

      Another section of the manual directs commanders to teach their operatives what to say if they're captured, and to explain it "more than once to ensure that they have assimilated it." To reinforce the message, it tells commanders to have operatives "explain it back to the commander."

      One consequence of this lying, and international pressure on their behalf, is that committed terrorists have been released who then return to Jihad again, killing who knows how many.

      Recidivism rises among released Guantanamo detainees

      (Reuters) - The proportion of militants released from detention at the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay who subsequently were believed to have returned to the battlefield rose slightly over the last year, according to official figures released on Monday.

      In a summary report, the office of the Director of National Intelligence said that 27.9 percent of the 599 former detainees released from Guantanamo were either confirmed or suspected of later engaging in militant activity

      Second, as does sometimes happen in war, service members will occasionally exceed their instructions, lose control, or develop a mental illness, and then engage in behavior that constitutes a war crime. Some people want to pretend that those actions are deliberate policy rather than the illegal actions of an individual or particular group. One prime example is the incident at Abu Ghraib. It resulted in a number of American soldiers going to jail, including the infamous Lynndie England. An isolated incident by a small number of soldiers that took an extraordinary number of pictures in a very short time, and gave a black eye to the US military and the United States. The actual events were magnified by the work of the media - the New York Times put stories and/or pictures on the front page 47 times.

      Pay? Nobody pays me to post. But I do like to see the discussion occasionally enter the realm of facts even if it aggravates some people.

      After all, facts that contradict some political view are "flamebait."

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do like to see the discussion occasionally enter the realm of facts even if it aggravates some people.

      Fact: If we tried the prisoners for first degree murder and executed those found guilty, the recidivism rate would be zero.

      Instead we pay how much to keep them sitting around forever, then when someone whines we get a bullshit court that does a bullshit pony show on bullshit charges, sentences them to a bullshit sentence, then releases them so we can act all surprised and sorry when they kill someone again.

      This behavior crosses all the lines. This is pure grade A malfeasant preschool temper-tantrum "I'll show you! You'll regret it waaaaaaaaah!" behavior, perpretrated by Bush, Obama and You. I doubt that the secret service would look kindly on anyone giving Bush or Obama the spanking they need though.

    5. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/05/13/2212253/us-government-monitoring-associated-press-phone-records
      It's hard to claim human rights high grounds when you pull stunts like this.

      As much as the government will admit to the above, some claim that's merely the tip of the iceberg:
      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/05/05/2329240/former-fbi-agent-all-digital-communications-stored-by-us-govt

      Getting alot of mileage, but pot calling the kettle black is as appropriate as ever.

    6. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      That is why there are checks and balances.

      Obama waits for probe before condemning IRS; Congress pounces

      Having a good overall human rights record doesn't necessarily mean that nothing bad ever happens, but the system should respond to it in an appropriate way.

      The AP scandal is pretty fresh, but I have little doubt it will provide the administration some very uncomfortable moments in the months ahead.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    7. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! you been drinkin' the cool-aide!

      Take about 5 minutes to research any of your claims, and you will realize you are wrong on all counts.

      prisoners in the US are both due to racism and politics. The percentage of whites committing crimes vs. persons of color committing crimes vs. the percentage of whites/persons of color convicted of crimes and serving time has an outrageous disparity. Especially death row. We have factories in prisons staffed by descendants of slaves working as slaves..

      Private for profit prisons also need to fill their beds. Read up a little bit, and you will find a few judges who sent thousands of children to private prison in exchange for 6 figure bribes.

      For a little history lesson, read up on cointelpro. You will find that many prisoners in the US, today are political prisoners.

      Torture. Having been a child in Guatemala, I can assure you the US has been involved in torture for decades, and has been complicit in the torture, disappearance and murders of (at least) tens of thousands. The US, has been involved in torture in nearly every Central American state, and in E. Europe, as well as the Middle East, and Far East. Now, probably in Africa too. The US even has a torture / coupe training camp in Fort Benning GA. Ronald Reagan has another name outside the US, "Reagan the Butcher". He was complicit in genocide even.

      "3 persons" I _know_ more people than that who were tortured and murdered by, and in service of, the US. I tried to keep it civil, but have to say, to this, Fuck you, you fucking lying sack of shit.

      If you "define the battlefield" as anywhere and combatants as any post-pubescent person, then you can murder at will, right? We really need Nuremberg trials for Americans complicit in these crimes. Per well established International law, _and_ domestic law, every person in both the Bush and Obama administrations, and most of the American foot soldiers committing the crimes on the ground would be locked up or executed. (Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan administrations, etc. too)

      And, no, the US is a pariah state. It has zero credibility on human rights. What the US has are military bases all over the world. It is a short-term strategy. Eventually, (soon if the military keeps up its leeching of all our tax dollars), the US will collapse under the weight of maintaining its huge military machine.

      Are you still confused?

    8. Re:yeah. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      Although sometimes the torture is indeed deliberate policy. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/may/13/guantanamo-bay-hunger-strike-forced-feeding

      On a related note, can you post any facts on whether the CIA had or has a policy of followup drone strikes on rescuers/funerals and/or of treating multiple civilian casualties as acceptable if it means another dead terrorist? E.g. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/19/world/asia/19pstan.html?_r=1&ref=world

      I'm more than beginning to have the disturbing sense that the US government/military has stared too long into the abyss. Yeah, we know the bad guys are evil. Flying airliners packed with civilians into buildings is pretty damn obviously evil. But it's becoming less obvious how good those claiming to be the good guys still are.

    9. Re:yeah. by emt377 · · Score: 1

      To be accorded full POW status you also have to reveal your name and rank, and obviously identify yourself as an enemy partisan. If you respond "al-Qaeda, what's that?" you really have no rights under the Geneva conventions. We can decide you're an enemy clandestine operator - which means as far as the Geneva conventions are concerned we could execute you on the spot.

    10. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

      Although sometimes the torture is indeed deliberate policy.

      It turns out that this "torture" is a routine medical procedure performed daily for large numbers of people, from infants to the elderly: Feeding tube. Are they being "tortured" too?

      So, question for you - if the US authorities were to stop forced feeding, and 60 detainees actually did starve themselves to death, would you complain? I expect so. Sort of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation, isn't it? What do you think would happen if the threat of starving yourself to death becomes a "get out of jail free card?"

      Keep in mind that the Islamists fighting the West do not fight alone, they have allies.
      The Leftist-Islamist Alliance in Pictures
      It's Official: Leftist-Islamist Alliance against the West

      On a related note, can you post any facts on whether the CIA had or has a policy of followup drone strikes . . .

      Maybe this will help:

      Pakistan Says Drone Strikes Have Been Effective

      Major-General Ghayur Mehmood spoke to a group of Pakistani reporters on a rare trip to Miran Shah, the administrative center of North Waziristan.

      The Pakistani general says that information the military has gathered from its sources suggest most of those killed in drone attacks are hardcore militants, and the number of innocent people being killed is relatively low.

      The official paper distributed among reporters says that there have been 164 drone strikes in the militant-dominated region of North Waziristan since 2007, killing 964 "terrorists". There were 171 al-Qaida fighters among those killed, mostly belonging to central Asian and Arab countries.

      ------

      I'm more than beginning to have the disturbing sense that the US government/military has stared too long into the abyss.

      The media is having its intended effect.

      If you have any brainstorms about how to do this better, I'm sure the Pentagon would love to hear about it. Send them a letter. Maybe something like, "Dear General, I know how you can get all the Al Qaida to stop fighting. All you have to do is ....."
      If the next part is, "give up their fringe religious views and dreams of conquering the world for Islam," that isn't going to be very helpful.

      Before you think about such a thing, you might want to read up on Al Qaida's goals.
      The Future of Terrorism: What al-Qaida Really Wants

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    11. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Continuing the long Slashdot tradition of "facts are flamebait."

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    12. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... The US has credibility ...

      Also when the US tells Germany how to reduce the national debt.

    13. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. The US has credibility when it comes to human rights.

      Yes, it does.

      US does have credibility, just not very much. "Stop the terrorism!" while drone bombing civilians is kinda lame. As is keeping people in undefined legal state in another country, that's not how you'd expect land of the free, home of the brave to operate. It actually looks like your leaders are scared of what they have done, and now just try to hide everything so they dn't get in trouble. Doesn't look brave, or free, or anything to fight for.

    14. Re:yeah. by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      Millions of US citizens also take baths every day. Some even dunk their head under the water to rinse away shampoo.

      Close enough that water boarding is just maintaining the prisoners' head hygiene?

      Without making any judgement on interrogation practices or detainee treatment, the argument that something is a "routine ... procedure performed daily for large numbers of people" and therefore not torture is illogical.

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
    15. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesnt mean that guatanamo bay doesnt violate human rights.. The defense in this thread for it to exist are beyond silly..

    16. Re:yeah. by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Also known as the "and you are lynching Negroes" defense: The Soviets used the endemic racism and violence in the US as an excuse to send people to the gulag or have them killed after a show trial.

      Let's go with this: The Russians are wrong for going after, for instance, Pussy Riot. The Americans are wrong for going after, say, Yaser Hamdi and Bradley Manning in the way that they did. There are some countries with a good human rights record, but Russia and the US are not among them.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    17. Re:yeah. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      They are imprisoned for what are recognizable as ordinary criminal offenses, such as drug offenses. People in the United States are not imprisoned for things like singing songs that insult the president, such as this.

      Drug offences are not "ordinary criminal offences". Assault, fraud, and theft are ordinary criminal offenses. Drug prohibition is simply oppressive.

      You are referring to Prisoners of War.

      No, we're referring to innocent people being wrongly held. Most of those in Guantanamo are known not to pose a threat, and about a third of them are known to be entirely innocent.

      The US waterboarded a total of three people, the most recent of which was 10 years ago.

      Which is a war crime. When are the prosecutions going to start?

      Killing people on the battlefield or in the theater of war isn't summary execution, but simply killing, and in no way illegitimate

      "On the battlefield"? How about "attending a wedding party"?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    18. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      No, waterboarding is not meant to maintain hygiene. It is clearly a coercive measure. But coercion doesn't necessarily imply torture legally. Torture has specific legal meaning and tests.

      Medical procedures necessary to sustain life are sometime uncomfortable or even painful for a period of time, and can even result in significant damage to the body. Does that make them torture? If US forces found an Al Qaida member who had a suicide bomb charge that detonated prematurely and shredded one of his legs, it is quite likely that it would be medically necessary to preserve his life to apply a tourniquet and then amputate the leg. Is that torture? What if it is the exact same thing that had been done to US soldiers in the same situation, both before and since? Clearly, it isn't torture legally or ethically. If they did the same thing to a healthy, undamaged prisoner, it would be.

      If the routine medical procedure is done in the customary manner for the same reason, it is difficult to see how it could be torture, logically.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    19. Re:yeah. by smash · · Score: 1

      Take GITMO out of it and you still have more of your population in jail than any other country on the planet.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    20. Re:yeah. by smash · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the war have to be legal for POW regulations to actually be in effect? Iraq was illegal. Not sure on afghanistan.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    21. Re:yeah. by smash · · Score: 1

      Pretty much what he said.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    22. Re:yeah. by Sabriel · · Score: 2

      It turns out that this "torture" is a routine medical procedure performed daily for large numbers of people, from infants to the elderly: Feeding tube. Are they being "tortured" too?

      Have you ever been intubated? Against your will? Infant, elderly or otherwise, if they or their next of kin are capable of informed consent, refuse, and then are shackled, restrained and operated on anyway, then yes, they are being tortured. If my word isn't enough, I refer you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Tokyo and http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c18/index.html

      So, question for you - if the US authorities were to stop forced feeding, and 60 detainees actually did starve themselves to death, would you complain? I expect so. Sort of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation, isn't it? What do you think would happen if the threat of starving yourself to death becomes a "get out of jail free card?"

      Why yes it is a damned if you do, damned if you don't - but is that any surprise when you're "indefinitely detaining" people extra-territorially to avoid those pesky "habeus corpus" laws? There's no "get out of consequences free" card just because you allege a higher moral ground than your enemy. And it seems to me it's not a "get out of jail free" card either, unless you mean "free" as in dead. But they're not even allowed that. And no, the probability that most of them are evil terrorists does not excuse torture.

      Keep in mind that the Islamists fighting the West do not fight alone, they have allies.

      [snips quoted links] I too have some links too if you want them. There's one in particular with video of Rumsfeld and Saddam shaking hands in 1983, around the time US administration decided to look the other way for a while whilst Iraq was using chemical weapons against Iran.

      How much has really changed since then? Has the government really done anything to truly show those allies that it's much nicer now and they have no reason whatsoever to be suspicious despite the long US habit of funding coups against democratically elected foreign governments that don't bend to its demands?

      Maybe this will help: Pakistan Says Drone Strikes Have Been Effective

      Major-General Ghayur Mehmood spoke to a group of Pakistani reporters on a rare trip to Miran Shah, the administrative center of North Waziristan.

      The Pakistani general says that information the military has gathered from its sources suggest most of those killed in drone attacks are hardcore militants, and the number of innocent people being killed is relatively low.

      ....

      Also from that article, "Because on one hand the drone attacks are a violation of Pakistan's sovereignty and it is also a violation of international law. But at the same time, they have a certain tactical utility in the sense that Pakistan has lost control over these areas and if the American drones help in containing these forces and also killing some of the militants, specially their top leadership, then it will facilitate Pakistan's fighting against the militant forces," Masood states.

      How's that old rationalization go? "You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs"?

      If you have any brainstorms about how to do this better, I'm sure the Pentagon would love to hear about it. Send them a letter. Maybe something like, "Dear General, I know how you can get all the Al Qaida to stop fighting. All you have to do is ....." If the next part is, "give up their fringe religious views an

    23. Re:yeah. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      The American Medical Association, the World Medical Assembly, etcetera, etcetera, disagree with you.

      6. Where a prisoner refuses nourishment and is considered by the physician as capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment concerning the consequences of such a voluntary refusal of nourishment, he or she shall not be fed artificially. The decision as to the capacity of the prisoner to form such a judgment should be confirmed by at least one other independent physician. The consequences of the refusal of nourishment shall be explained by the physician to the prisoner.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Tokyo and http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/c18/index.html

    24. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Drug offences are not "ordinary criminal offences". Assault, fraud, and theft are ordinary criminal offenses. Drug prohibition is simply oppressive.

      I think the number of countries without some sort of limitation, whether substance, quantity, purity, purpose, or other, is going to be very small. If you want to talk about minor edge cases, as marijuana, that is one thing, heroin is another.

      Most of those in Guantanamo are known not to pose a threat, and about a third of them are known to be entirely innocent.

      Guantanamo is pretty much down to the hardcore cases now. Of the "innocents" that were outright released, instead of transferred to prison in another country, at least 27% have been found back on the battlefield engaging in Jihad. Several of those released have engaged in infamous attacks.

      Which is a war crime. When are the prosecutions going to start?

      It could be a war crime . . . if they were protected persons. Unfortunately Al Qaida has made the commission of war crimes a focus of their strategy and thereby forfeits the conventions protections. (Where the "unlawful combatant" classification comes from.) The US has been gracious enough to treat them largely in accordance with the convention nonetheless. Now if this was the 1940s, and it was German soldiers we were talking about, or the 1950s and Korean soldiers, it would be illegal and the two of us would hold the same position.

      "On the battlefield"? How about "attending a wedding party [wikipedia.org]"?

      That would fall under the "theater of war" following the "battlefield or" part.

      But, wedding parties are an interesting topic. It is an unfortunate fact of life that during armed conflict mistakes will occur, and attacks that shouldn't happen, do happen. To the best of my knowledge the NATO forces compensate victims and their families for mistaken attacks in the customary Afghan way. They also try to learn from the mistake and try to not repeat it. On the other hand, the Taliban propagandists aren't shy about accusing NATO forces of attacking "wedding parties" that consist of solely Taliban fighters. Of course, they have their own problems with weddings.

      ISAF Discusses Insurgent Propaganda Messaging

      “Their spokesmen do not hold themselves to a truth standard,” the official said. “Common Taliban propaganda practices are to fabricate or inflate damage estimates and deflect blame away from their fighters for civilian causalities.”

      As an example, the official cited a June suicide bomb attack on a wedding party in Kandahar Province which killed over 35 Afghans and injured more than 70. Following the event, Taliban spokesmen claimed area was bombarded by coalition forces. Evidence from an investigation into the event, including ball bearings found in the victims’ bodies, proved the Taliban spokesperson’s claim false.

      17 Afghans beheaded by the Taliban because they danced at a party

      KABUL, Afghanistan - Insurgents beheaded 17 civilians in a Taliban-controlled area of southern Afghanistan, apparently because they attended a dance party that flouted the extreme brand of Islam embraced by the militants, officials said Monday.. . .

      The victims were part of a large group that had gathered late Sunday in Helmand province's Musa Qala district for a celebration involving music and dancing, said district government chief Neyamatullah Khan. He said the Taliban slaughtered them to show their disapproval of the event. . . .

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    25. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is your concern why?

    26. Re:yeah. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I think the number of countries without some sort of limitation, whether substance, quantity, purity, purpose, or other, is going to be very small.

      The number of non-oppressive countries is very small. That doesn't change the fact that drug prohibition is oppressive.

      Guantanamo is pretty much down to the hardcore cases now.

      So? They still imprisoned hundreds of innocent people for no reason.

      Of the "innocents" that were outright released, instead of transferred to prison in another country, at least 27% have been found back on the battlefield engaging in Jihad. Several of those released have engaged in infamous attacks.

      Exactly. The US is manufacturing the terrorists it claims it wants to get rid of. Wouldn't you hold a grudge against a foreign occupying nation that held you without cause for years? If released, wouldn't you join the opposition?

      It could be a war crime . . . if they were protected persons.
      Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, "enemy combatants" are protected persons.

      That would fall under the "theater of war" following the "battlefield or" part.

      Ah, so everyone unfortunate enough to live in Afghanistan should leave or it's their own fault when the US blows them up. Really winning over their hearts and minds there.

      Explain this to me. Why is it OK for the US to blow up a wedding party in afghanistan, but it's not OK for Afghans to blow up a wedding party in the US?

      On the other hand, the Taliban propagandists aren't shy about accusing NATO forces of attacking "wedding parties" that consist of solely Taliban fighters. Of course, they have their own problems with weddings.

      I'm not defending the Taliban. It's possible for both the US and the Taliban to be evil. I for one want to live in a country that takes the high road.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    27. Re:yeah. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      If those are indeed the rules, as seems plausible, what it boils down to is that only the powerful have any rights.

      Given that, it's not surprising that those who do not feel counted among the powerful choose to ignore the rules.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    28. Re:yeah. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment concerning the consequences of such a voluntary refusal of nourishment . . .

      First set of key words being voluntary refusal. It isn't completely voluntary, is it?

      The military has said that some prisoners are pressuring others to join the hunger strike, and that some of those being tube-fed occasionally eat regular meals or voluntarily drink nutritional supplements when they are removed from their cell blocks and are alone with medical personnel. . . -- American Medical Association questions Guantanamo force-feedings

      Second set of key words being capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment.

      Almost 100 Guantánamo prisoners were classified by the US army as having psychiatric illnesses including severe depression, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the prison camp files reveal. -- Guantánamo Bay files: Grim toll on mental health of prisoners

      100 out of 179 is a pretty big fraction. It is also oddly close to the number of inmates on hunger strike.

      The ones that are left in Guantanamo are pretty much the hardcore. They were willing to give their life for the cause if need be. They have previously engaged in synchronized suicide attempts as a political attack. The suicide Jihad continues, just without bombs in this case.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    29. Re:yeah. by airdweller · · Score: 1

      That was one of the most idiotic things I've ever read. You didn't even fail at logic b/c you didn't use any.
      I really hope you get waterboarded just so you could experience your own idiocy. But, I'm afraid, that would be pointless b/c you won't be able to realize the irony. Oh well...

    30. Re:yeah. by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      First set of key words being voluntary refusal. It isn't completely voluntary, is it?

      The military has said that some prisoners are pressuring others to join the hunger strike, and that some of those being tube-fed occasionally eat regular meals or voluntarily drink nutritional supplements when they are removed from their cell blocks and are alone with medical personnel. . . -- American Medical Association questions Guantanamo force-feedings

      I know I'm being idealistic and picky here. I am reading your links in full before I post. First, "some". So, not "all", not "most", not "half". Second, "pressuring". If this is in the form of "peer pressure", i.e. non-physical persuasion, is that particularly unexpected in a harsh "us" vs "them" environment? I refer you to the Stanford prison experiment and its UK counterpart as to how quickly that "us" vs "them" mentality can form even amongst random Western civilians, including hunger strikes. Third, "alone with medical personnel". So, however momentarily, they weren't in that "us" vs "them" environment?

      Second set of key words being capable of forming an unimpaired and rational judgment.

      Almost 100 Guantánamo prisoners were classified by the US army as having psychiatric illnesses including severe depression, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, the prison camp files reveal. -- Guantánamo Bay files: Grim toll on mental health of prisoners

      So we have almost 100 mentally ill people being kept in an extra-territorial maximum-security military prison instead of a (military, even) mental hospital?

      100 out of 179 is a pretty big fraction. It is also oddly close to the number of inmates on hunger strike.

      The ones that are left in Guantanamo are pretty much the hardcore. They were willing to give their life for the cause if need be. They have previously engaged in synchronized suicide attempts as a political attack. The suicide Jihad continues, just without bombs in this case.

      Um. This might be a stupid question, and feels quite surreal, but: if they truly want to kill themselves, but this time without killing anyone else, and the only alternative (that we're willing to do) is - by our ethical standards - to perform torture upon them, why are we lowering our standards?

      But to go on. From your link, "None of the five detainees believed to have killed themselves at Guantánamo Bay have any mental health issues noted within the files. However, all have a record of alleged disruptive behaviour and non-compliance. Most are among the 25 detainees who the files say went on hunger strikes." So we apparently have - had - at least five detainees potentially "capable of forming unimpaired and rational judgements" who killed themselves rather than submit to prison authorities.

      Furthermore, "Yasser Talal Zahrani, one of three prisoners who killed themselves on 10 June 2006, was noted to be of low intelligence value", (note "value", so it's referring to military intelligence not personal psychology), "with "unremarkable" exposure to jihadist elements." So are we sure it's just the "hardcore" ones that are "willing to give their life"?

      This is the country - the US, I mean - that has both a strong democratic tradition (CIA World Factbook) and the world's highest incarceration rate (International Centre for Prison Studies). What exactly does that say about us? (and yes, I know I keep using "us" and "we" and such, despite not being an American citizen, but the jokes about Australia/Canada/other being the "51st State" exist for a reason, and I was named and raised by a family that likes Westerns, so I associate even though I'm foremost Australian).

      "Give me liber

    31. Re:yeah. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      For one thing it's looking like some people running the USA are ignoring one of the things that made King George III's rule bad enough for them to revolt and form the USA in the first place.
      Anyway, that gets away from the point that it's difficult to point out even the major flaws of others when your own are on display, even if they are minor in comparison. A few drones killing people and it's hard to be taken seriously when complaining about even very large numbers of very obvious assassinations by another country.

    32. Re:yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is why there are checks and balances.

      You mean there are damage control when you're caught with your pants down?

      Having a good overall human rights record doesn't necessarily mean that nothing bad ever happens, but the system should respond to it in an appropriate way.

      Sorry genius, having a good overall human rights record DOES mean that nothing bad ever happens.
      You also believe having a good overall marriage doesn't necessarily mean that no extramarital sex ever happens, but the couple should respond to it in an appropriate way?

      The AP scandal is pretty fresh, but I have little doubt it will provide the administration some very uncomfortable moments in the months ahead.

      Yes genius, I did indicate it was classic hypocrisy of pot calling the kettle black.

    33. Re:yeah. by cusco · · Score: 1

      Daniel Pipes? You're quoting Daniel Pipes as some sort or reliable or authoritative source? You should be laughed off the Inter-tubes . . .

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    34. Re:yeah. by cusco · · Score: 1

      I like how you're talking up waterboarding (which when the Germans did it to US troops in WWII was called torture), and completely ignoring the sleep deprivation that has been known for decades to produce mental illness in previously healthy individuals. Now you get to use that deliberately induced mental illness as an excuse for something else. You are a truly sick individual.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    35. Re:yeah. by wikdwarlock · · Score: 1

      It's easy to see how it could be torture. For the specific case of Muslim terrorists who find it spiritually objectionable to drink alcohol, imagine their forced feeding slurry including wine. Or if not wine, maybe the terrorist believes eating pork is sinful, and the liquid food comes from processed pork. Or lima beans, or whatever. The effect of knowingly, but against your will, ingesting a food could be psychologically traumatizing and cause mental pain.

      A completely reasonable food, administered in a completely reasonable way could still be torture.

      --

      "I must not fear. Fear is the mind killer." -Bene Gesserit Litany Against Fear
  12. timing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't doubt for a second that this was an American agent. But I would think in every situation there is a reason everything happens when it did. Why did the Russians nab him now. Why not keep him under surveillance let him reveal traitors to the FSB as they get recruited? They obviously were not all that serious or they wouldn't have promptly turned him back over to the US. So what is up?

    1. Re:timing? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt for a second that this was an American agent. But I would think in every situation there is a reason everything happens when it did. Why did the Russians nab him now. Why not keep him under surveillance let him reveal traitors to the FSB as they get recruited? They obviously were not all that serious or they wouldn't have promptly turned him back over to the US. So what is up?

      When the article says "The incident comes amid a new chill in Russian-U.S. relations sparked by the Syrian crisis and concern in Washington over what it sees as President Vladimir Putin's crackdown on human rights.", it should probably say that it comes because of the chill.

      See also, 'game'.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:timing? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I would guess that, among other reasons, they figured he was too inept to lead to anything useful, so they might as well get rid of him so as not to be distracted. And he *was* a blatantly corrupting influence.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  13. This story sounds ridiculous by mike449 · · Score: 2

    A compass, a paper map of Moscow and a flashlight? Is this all CIA has in its arsenal? O yeah, a semi-literate "recruitment letter".
    Another detail that make it sound even more ridiculous: an FSB guy lecturing Fogle on Russian primetime news about how spying is bad. Looks like some really bad spy movie.
    I think this story was created by FSB for consumption within Russia. It is possible they knew more about his activities, but they are not telling the interesting stuff and for some reason decided to disclose this "evidence" that makes people laugh.

    1. Re:This story sounds ridiculous by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Go check out some of the gear in the Spy Museum some time. You would be amazed at how lame and silly some of the CIA equipment has been over the decades, not to mention their instruction manuals (which are often downright bizarre and intentionally hilarious).

      Keep in mind that the CIA is not exactly known for recruiting the best and brightest. When it comes to recruits, they have traditionally valued loyalty and obedience over actual intelligence.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    2. Re:This story sounds ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha Ha. Do you really think is fake ? So why didn't you question the story with the red hot russian spy in Washington.
      Is a good example of patsies covering the experts.
      Laugh or cry is just a game and Dan Aykroyd and Chevy Chase got it right years ago.

    3. Re:This story sounds ridiculous by deadweight · · Score: 1

      FSB - we got some hot intel on jihadis - got anything to trade? CIA - we got a n00b geek that needs to go back to the main office and not waste space at the embassy? FSB - wanna have some fun? CIA - sure - want us to give him a wig or two? FSB - lol

  14. This is news for nerds? by mishehu · · Score: 1

    Not trying to start a flame-war here, but I've been seeing a fair amount of strictly politics related postings here lately. Could anybody please explain to me how this is on topic for Slashdot?

    1. Re:This is news for nerds? by fightinfilipino · · Score: 1

      there are definitely espionage and foreign relations nerds. this would also qualify under "stuff that matters", since incidents that affect the peaceful relations of two world powers would count as such.

    2. Re:This is news for nerds? by neo8750 · · Score: 1

      nerds are into politics sometimes?

    3. Re:This is news for nerds? by gman003 · · Score: 2

      Story is about a spy, James Bond is a spy, Bond uses crazy gadgets, nerds love crazy gadgets.

      QED.

    4. Re:This is news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are definitely espionage and foreign relations nerds.

      foreign relations nerds?

      ?????????????

      Fuck you, go back to whereever you came from.

      Foreign Relations Nerds.

      Fuck, why don't we have Football Nerds. Or Malt Liquor Nerds.

      Christ almighty, Foreign Relations Nerds. Jesus almighty christ.

    5. Re:This is news for nerds? by cusco · · Score: 1

      Just watch how much traffic a story about early brewing or distillation techniques gets, and you'll realize that there are malt liquor and liquor nerds.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    6. Re:This is news for nerds? by tlambert · · Score: 2

      Not trying to start a flame-war here, but I've been seeing a fair amount of strictly politics related postings here lately. Could anybody please explain to me how this is on topic for Slashdot?

      I'm guessing the flashlight he had was a Google Firesword?

    7. Re:This is news for nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how China has paid astroturfers?

    8. Re:This is news for nerds? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      As mentioned in this slashdot discussion page he had a RFID shielded bag.
      http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-05-14/russia-captures-us-embassy-worker-act-cia-recruitment
      Wireless is safe for "anyone" in the USA but we see the CIA understanding the need for a shielded bag.
      We now know the NSA and CIA loves/trusts Google.
      The need to buy a clean computer like device with cash to email from.
      The CIA feels they can lure/own a Russian with $100k.
      The going rate from the CIA is now $1 million.
      New fratboy fancy dress party idea is super easy - cheapest wig, a cap and shirt. Hand out your own spy letters at the party with amazing offers.
      Just watch for the Keep Geeks Busy types.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:This is news for nerds? by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Nerds are into wigs?

    10. Re:This is news for nerds? by gman003 · · Score: 2

      By the transitive property, yes.

    11. Re:This is news for nerds? by mishehu · · Score: 1

      I guess you're right... But this could be a corollary to Rule 34 no? (If you can think of it, there's a group of "nerds" interested in it...) :-)

  15. Somewhat old fashioned mobile phone by dbIII · · Score: 4, Funny

    Excuse me Sir. Your shoe is ringing.

    1. Re:Somewhat old fashioned mobile phone by Sulphur · · Score: 2

      Excuse me Sir. Your shoe is ringing.

      Which one?

    2. Re:Somewhat old fashioned mobile phone by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

      That must have been what Nikita Khrushchev was complaining about when he banged his shoe on the table at the UN: "Why doesn't this thing ever get good reception in here!"

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  16. Counter Counter Counter Intelligence by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We suspect this man is spy."
    "Take his money, Tell him only lies, see where lies turn up."

    "Maybe they know, we know, he is spy?"
    "Possible. He has been searched?"
    "He is carry a compass, torch, map of Moscow, mobile phone..."

    "Yes, is spy. They expect we know. Use our lies to deceive. Make false leak to trick us... Kill him -- Wait, he has wig, yes?"
    "Has not only a wig, but two."

    "Two wigs? Ah! Is sign of double agent! Carry one wig, is a risk. Two is job application."
    "You want I should not kill him then?"
    "Of course not. Pay him standard fee; Send back to embassy. Tell this story to news, so CIA know he can not spy here. He can go home, work for us."
    "Moscow Winter is the Father Land's greatest ally. Thin blooded American will do anything to escape it."

    "One thing. Why we must speak filthy English, not Russian?"
    "Everyone knows. Is basic spy training to trick double agen--- Wait, you are American SPY!"
    ::BLAM::
    "No. I'm a Brit you poor, dead git."

    1. Re:Counter Counter Counter Intelligence by ketomax · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many views this would get on Youtube.

  17. Torch by JustOK · · Score: 0

    Isn't "a torch" and "a somewhat old fashioned mobile phone" the same thing?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:Torch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't "a torch" and "a somewhat old fashioned mobile phone" the same thing?

      No, he had a laptop from the same era. The FSB was confused by it booting on fire.

    2. Re:Torch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Torch is British for flashlight.

    3. Re:Torch by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

      Don't joke about that, that's how lp0 died.

    4. Re:Torch by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Well, why would an American have a British flashlight?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  18. Vienna Convention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised that nobody has brought up an obvious point:

    Article 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations prohibits the arrest or detention of a diplomat.

    The US Department of State even issues guidance to law enforcement on how to deal with issues in the USA. Even if the case of driving while intoxicated, the officer may remove the keys or prevent the diplomat from driving, but may not handcuff the diplomat or prevent him/her from leaving.

    1. Re:Vienna Convention? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1

      Article 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations prohibits the arrest or detention of a diplomat.

      Pretty sure that doesn't cover spies using diplomatic cover.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  19. Sheesh by fullback · · Score: 1

    Every U.S. embassy has CIA staff.

  20. Torch! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torch eh? Good thing he didn't light it on fire ahead of time - would have set his briefcase on fire!

  21. In ex-Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spies kick YOU out!

  22. GITMO by tlambert · · Score: 1

    Yes, GITMO etc removes the moral high ground, but that doesn't change things like a difficult journalist getting assassinated as a present for Putin's birthday last year.

    Actually GITMO is precisely to maintain the moral high ground by providing extraterritoriality. The extraterritoriality is what makes it safe from enforcement of US law, and makes the president and his underlings safe from accusations of violating US law by condoning events on its premises.

    This is exactly why it has not been shut down, despite the campaign promises of several presidents, including Obama. Once sworn in, they get a thorough briefing on everything, which includes a little sit-down about GITMO with the White House General Council, after which it stays open to aboid personal criminal liability for the staff in the executive branch, up to and including the president.

    1. Re:GITMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      precisely to maintain the moral high ground by providing extraterritoriality

      That's precisely the opposite of maintaining the moral high ground.

    2. Re:GITMO by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Actually GITMO is precisely to maintain the moral high ground by providing extraterritoriality.

      No that's called being a weasel with a trick that doesn't fool anyone but avoids some inconvenient wording. It actually results in a greater loss of moral high ground than taking responsibility would. I doubt even Nixon would have tried to pull that one, but here we are today with it.

    3. Re:GITMO by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      Yes, GITMO etc removes the moral high ground, but that doesn't change things like a difficult journalist getting assassinated as a present for Putin's birthday last year.

      Actually GITMO is precisely to maintain the moral high ground by providing extraterritoriality. The extraterritoriality is what makes it safe from enforcement of US law, and makes the president and his underlings safe from accusations of violating US law by condoning events on its premises.

      This is exactly why it has not been shut down, despite the campaign promises of several presidents, including Obama. Once sworn in, they get a thorough briefing on everything, which includes a little sit-down about GITMO with the White House General Council, after which it stays open to aboid personal criminal liability for the staff in the executive branch, up to and including the president.

      are you as retarded as GWB and the in office Obama? everyone knows why they did gitmo - precisely that's why it's not maintaining any moral high ground, it's an ongoing example of how the american government can do what it wants and not give a fuck about rules they imposed on themselves or rules from international agreements.

      it doesn't maintain moral high ground. it only maintains nitpicking-with-laws high ground whilst clearly being against the intention of said laws. it only provides any high ground if you're a totally retarded person. I mean, keeping an American prison on Cuban soil so you can Ignore American and international laws? it's fucking retarded, imprisoning people based on american laws and at the same time arguing that you don't need to apply american laws to them!

      it's so fucking retarded that they're unable to close it down since they know that if anyone of them makes it to a place where they have access to suing the americans then there will be either time to serve or money to be paid by whoever authorized it and worked there.

      so it's not maintaining moral high ground - if anything it's digging a hole. not just a hole, a fucking grand canyon.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  23. BFD by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I really don't understand all the outrage about spying. OF COURSE the CIA is spying on Russia - it's their fucking job to spy on Russia! And of course Russia is spying on us - it's their job, too. Once in a while somebody gets caught - but so what? You shrug your shoulders, say "OK, you won this round", and then you get right back to business. It doesn't mean either side is being "bad guys"; we shouldn't be surprised or upset when we catch one of theirs, and we shouldn't feel embarrassed when they catch one of ours (OK, maybe we should be embarrassed about being so inept we were caught, but not embarrassed about what we were caught doing).

    News flash: the CIA spies on Russia and occasionally gets caught! In other news, water remains wet and rocks remain hard.

    1. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue is when you cross the line a little too far, i.e. you start bribing or buying off government officials as is being suggested here. Once that happens you are crossing from just spying to out and out corruption.

    2. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Someone else is also doing bad things" is a very bad argument for doing bad things.

    3. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Mwahaha, Bribing government officials is crossing the line in espionage? That line is crossed many MANY times every day.

      Something like assassination may be crossing the line... but that clearly hasn't stopped either country from it. if ONLY they would limit it to giving people money...

    4. Re:BFD by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The consignment of criminal acts is dangerous. Oh tee hee a foreign agent killed some citizens, oh tee hee a foreign agent funded internal terrorists, oh tee hee foreign agent is consorting with and funding local organised crim. Perhaps a foreign agent corrupted local politicians to start a war and kill thousands of our soldiers to fulfil their goals of regional dominance, hmm, Mossad and the US government, not so fucking funny now is it. Capturing intelligence is worlds apart from inciting criminal acts like treason.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't understand all the outrage about spying.

      Maybe because you have been living in a cave for a while and missed all the outraged news about the Chinese trying steal [insert US technology/secrets]?

      Hint: when the US govt and media like to demonize other countries by playing up the outrage at being spied on, don't be surprised when other countries turned around and play the same card.

    6. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't joke about crim. Crim is serious business. Just say no to crim. Crim.

    7. Re:BFD by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

      Capturing intelligence is worlds apart from inciting criminal acts like treason.

      Capturing HUMINT is going to involve inciting treason almost 100% of the time given that spying against your country is usually considered treason.

    8. Re:BFD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Someone else is also doing bad things" is a very bad argument for doing bad things.

      Please explain what "bad things" are being done. And don't say, "Oh, breaking The Law is a Bad Thing. Because laws."

    9. Re:BFD by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      Of course the chinese try to steal our secrets and technologies. I hope they don't succeed very often, but I don't blame them for trying.

      I'm not surprised when ANY gov't (US or anyone else) tries to play up stuff like this - I'm surprised when they succeed.

    10. Re:BFD by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      OK, let me be clearer: it's not just the job they've been assigned, it's the job I want them to be doing, and which I pay them to do. (OK, we can quibble about whether we're getting our money's worth or not, but that's a separate argument)

      I don't think it's at all bad to try to find out what's actually going on in another country. Are you seriously suggesting that any country should just take every other country's gov't (friendly or hostile) at face value? I hope not: they'd be fools to do it, and seriously neglecting their responsibilities. I don't know about other countries, but the US gov't (and more particularly the people within in) is explicitly given the duty of protecting citizens from enemies. The first step is to find out who your enemies actually are, and asking them is kind of pointless - you have to snoop around and try to find out what's actually going on.

  24. Putin's crackdown on human rights by SysKoll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, as the OP said, there is a lot of concern about Putin's crackdown on human rights. Why, the rumor is that he is using the tax administration to harass opponents and that his chief Justice has grabbed phone records from news agencies that don't tow the line.

    Fortunately, such things would never happen in the US.

    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

  25. distraction/diversion? by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    You think that maybe this guy is a distraction/diversion? I sure do, and I suspect the Russians do too.

  26. Re:Reset by tsotha · · Score: 1

    Reset? It was "overcharge".

  27. doesnt add up by fazey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This doesnt make sense. CIA operatives are better than this. First since when does the CIA write a note that can be used as evidence. Next, search for the translation of the letter... they wanted him to sign up for gmail. FFS gmail? Really? Then they would contact him via that email address in a week. This seems like Russian propaganda and not a CIA operative being caught. Operatives always have a way out, and they would repeatedly try the same guy. If they wanted him bad enough, he would have been kidnapped. Nothing about this makes sense.

    1. Re:doesnt add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you think about it, it actually makes perfect sense. What is easier to deny, A highly skilled operative that has high tech equipment and encryption or someone that acts like Maxwell Smart and uses common and cheap tech. Personally if I was setting up an operation where there was some likelihood of getting caught then the second option would be my choice as realistically most of the time you don't actually need anything more than what that guy supposedly had.

    2. Re:doesnt add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would actually only need the bag of money. And not even that in the first phases. This whole thing makes absolutely no sense. Maybe he wasn't working for CIA, but for someone else that thought this kind of operation needs wigs and stuff? Maybe someone used him? Maybe he thought he was doing a gig for CIA.

    3. Re:doesnt add up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA has better operatives than this?

      Like the clowns who abducted Abu Omar in Italy for extraordinary rendition, then used their mobile phones to contact the US embassy, their family and friends in the US and Somewhere in Virginia. All 23 were then put on trial and found guilty in absentia.

  28. McLovin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should not have used his Hawaii driver's license

  29. Equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    show his alleged espionage equipment including wigs, a compass, torch and even a mundane atlas of Moscow as well as a somewhat old fashioned mobile phone

    I think I finally understand the CIAs remarkable success record at killing Fidel Castro.

  30. Sounds like inspector Clouseau by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this guy isn't from the Surete?
    The description sounds like something from Get Smart or something else.....not a serious CIA operative.

    1. Re:Sounds like inspector Clouseau by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Oh right... incompetence was his disguise.

  31. Operetta singer by Max_W · · Score: 1

    He looked more like operetta singer in this blond wig.

  32. "It's their job" by mha · · Score: 1

    This is a stupid (sorry!!!) thing to say: If "it's their job" is a justification for something, Mafia killers won't have any problems with the law.

    Please note I have no conclusion to offer as far as spying is concerned (in the above statement!), I merely want to make you think a little harder to come up with some better arguments.

    1. Re:"It's their job" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is a stupid (sorry!!!) thing to say: If "it's their job" is a justification for something, Mafia killers won't have any problems with the law.

      Since when is being a mafoisi a "job?"

  33. Could this evidence have been planted? by janimal · · Score: 1

    The equipment looks pretty lame, although I'm no expert at what is effective in avoiding surveillance or implication.

    What I wonder is if the FSB thought this guy was a spy and found no evidence (which is likely), but wanted to expel him (which is reasonable), why would the FSB not plant some grotesquely obvious evidence during the arrest? Would the CIA complain? How would they prove anything?

    It would be more likely the US would complain about an unjustified request for deportation, meanwhile this is an open and shut case.

    1. Re:Could this evidence have been planted? by smash · · Score: 1

      More likely, he's a spy. You think the US doesn't spy on other countries? The country who spent up big on things like the U2, SR71, Satellites, drones, etc?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  34. Truth Funnier than Fiction by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    The CIA and MI5 on one side, with the "no such thing as a former Chekist" FSB on the other, makes for more hijinks than anything Hal Roach could have produced with Laurel and Hardy or The Little Rascals.

    At least the Russians have some foxy spies, even if they perform like ZaSu Pitts in a custard pie fight.

    And these people are professionals? It is to laugh.

    No wonder the CIA leans on the Mossad for a great deal of information.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  35. BOOM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NUKESNUKESNUKES Lets reboot.

  36. Human Rights Crackdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >and concern in Washington over what it sees as President Vladimir Putin's crackdown on human rights

    Meanwhile, in Guantanamo 'hypocrisy' Bay inmates are having a ball ....

  37. russia's crackdown on human rights by smash · · Score: 1

    I don't see them maintaining anything like Guantanamo Bay?

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  38. can you say coverup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CIA for all its bungling in the Boston bombing is trying to say that Russian intelligence was too slow in coming through channels so they find it necessary to get the information by a more direct method. In other words this is a staged event after the fact to make it look like the CIA knows what their doing...move on to more important stories

  39. CIA never admits it by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    After a wikileak, foreign governments catching them, spies coming out -- the CIA wouldn't still admit somebody is a spy. Hell, they could reclassify something that was public and then refuse to acknowledge the obvious! That is how they work.

    Now if the spy upset Bush... THEN it could then get officially acknowledged (and it would still not result in consequences.)

    This hurts the state dept. not that anybody should have trusted them before and especially after wikileaks showed them for what many of us knew that they were. The CIA is using diplomats to do spying and corruption... the only thing perhaps new about this is that the CIA would be directly involved.

  40. File under "stupid" by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Excerpt:
    The Kremlin is surprised by the "crude and clumsy" espionage activities of the United States in Russia, after a suspected CIA operative was caught trying to recruit a Russian agent, a senior advisor to President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday.
    --- end excerpt ---

    The article, NOT in the US infotainment media, goes on to say that the Russians think he was trying to get information on the Boston Marathon bombers. That's even *more* stupid, since all the US had to do was *ask* - they'd *love* to have us down on the Chechens, too.

    This isn't even up to the level of Maxwell Smart.

                        mark