Slashdot Mirror


French Police End Missing Persons Searches, Suggest Using Facebook

itwbennett writes "According to an announcement on a French government website, police have stopped current searches for missing adults and will not accept new search requests. 'Such 'searches in the interests of the family' were conducted under an administrative procedure almost a century old, introduced to help families separated during the upheavals of World War I to find missing relatives,' according to the French Ministry of the Interior. In a letter to police chiefs announcing the changes, the Ministry advised them to instead 'direct people towards social networks on the Internet, which offer interesting possibilities.'"

13 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. So once again... by DigitalReverend · · Score: 5, Funny

    the French surrender.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:So once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nothing to see here. The French procedure does not correspond to that used in the US. Searches for children or persons who are clearly in danger continue.

  2. And stolen things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Should be looked for on ebay.

  3. Re:HELP!!! by spongebue · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the description of this says, this applies to adults. I'll admit I didn't RTFA, but I assume that means nothing will change with regards to children.

  4. Sensationalist summary by 200_success · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is missing the important qualifier "... unless the person may be in danger". So, apparent abductions and unexplained disappearances would still get police assistance like you would expect.

    1. Re:Sensationalist summary by advid.net · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, translation is:

      Allows you to search for a missing person, your family, to renew relations with her. Does not apply to missing persons in alarming conditions suspicious or criminal.

      So this kind of search is no longer available with the state help.
      Ok... Is it really worth a story on /. ?

    2. Re:Sensationalist summary by ColdCat · · Score: 5, Informative

      It change almost nothing.
      This law was to find your family members after long lost of contacts (years). It was to help family member reconnect after end of WW1 WW2 and after the end of colonisation in Asia and Africa. The administration do the research find the person, the ask him/her if he want to reconnect with you and if he/she wants give you the address. It's stopped because fewer and fewer people use it in the last decade.

      If someone is missing, police still do the research.
      If Someone need to be found to pay kids pension, to helps his/her parents, for fraud or taxes evasion, or even for some kind of family Inheritance there are others laws.

    3. Re:Sensationalist summary by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Funny

      remember to keep it under 3oz or you might not get through airport security.

  5. They suggest hiring Liam Neeson by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He has a very particular set of skills.

  6. Status Update... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Status update: Kidnapped

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  7. Re:HELP!!! by bws111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem seems to be in the phrase 'missing person', which I guess is a translation thing. When people hear 'missing person', they think of someone who has suddenly disappeared - didn't come home from work, etc. Those cases they will still investigate, of course. What they are no longer doing is helping to find a person you have lost contact with (and I can't imagine their are many police forces in the world that would help with that under normal circumstances).

  8. Re:HELP!!! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, taxpaying adults are shit out of luck

    Unlike children, adults have a right to disappear and start a new life somewhere else. Unless there is a reasonable suspicion that a law has been broken, the police should not be spending tax dollars to find people that don't want to be found.

  9. Re:HELP!!! by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    His children example was used for shockvalue, but the point is still the same - for the most part, if someone dissappears without a trace, foul play is involved. They MIGHT have just decided to skip town, but most people don't. Lets say its not your 9 year old daughter. Lets say your 23 year old daughter never comes home from work. I'd like to hear something besides "Check Facebook" from the local authorities.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain