Slashdot Mirror


French Police End Missing Persons Searches, Suggest Using Facebook

itwbennett writes "According to an announcement on a French government website, police have stopped current searches for missing adults and will not accept new search requests. 'Such 'searches in the interests of the family' were conducted under an administrative procedure almost a century old, introduced to help families separated during the upheavals of World War I to find missing relatives,' according to the French Ministry of the Interior. In a letter to police chiefs announcing the changes, the Ministry advised them to instead 'direct people towards social networks on the Internet, which offer interesting possibilities.'"

27 of 95 comments (clear)

  1. So once again... by DigitalReverend · · Score: 5, Funny

    the French surrender.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:So once again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nothing to see here. The French procedure does not correspond to that used in the US. Searches for children or persons who are clearly in danger continue.

    2. Re:So once again... by Picass0 · · Score: 2

      "You'll be suprised you're doing the French Mistake! Voila!"

    3. Re:So once again... by DigitalReverend · · Score: 2

      Excuse me while I whip this out.

      --
      I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    4. Re:So once again... by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really, there's a presumption that if somebody's been missing for more than a given amount of time that they're in danger, unless there's evidence to the contrary.

      Then it's a bad presumption. Most people go missing because they want to. You've got to look for children, senile people and people with mental health issues, because they may not have the capacity for making a rational choice to leave, and the chances of them coming to harm are higher. But adults who get out of contact with their families. In most cases it's because they don't like them, or have some issue they'd rather get away from.

    5. Re:So once again... by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And if there's foul play, there's likely to be something indicating that.

      Yeah, like the person is missing!

      In fact, the standard followed by most jurisdictions is: the absence of any indication of intent to disappear is in fact evidence of either an accident or foul play.

      Police make at least an effort to find people that simply disappear (after a suitable waiting period), and at least interview friends and workmates etc for changes in behavior, look at credit card usage, and request cell records, before throwing in the towel. (The effort is actually much larger if its a missing woman than if it is a man.) Its not an unreasonable level of effort, nor does it take a great deal of resources. (Some of this stuff is automated these days).

      Most people who CHOOSE go missing end up defrauding someone out of some amount of money. Unpaid rent, unpaid credit card bills, saddling a spouse with a huge debt, etc. Its not a victimless choice.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  2. And stolen things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Should be looked for on ebay.

  3. Re:HELP!!! by spongebue · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the description of this says, this applies to adults. I'll admit I didn't RTFA, but I assume that means nothing will change with regards to children.

  4. Re:HELP!!! by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Sure, if your 9 year old daughter is a missing adult, they won't be looking for her any time soon. What a snag!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  5. Sensationalist summary by 200_success · · Score: 5, Informative

    The summary is missing the important qualifier "... unless the person may be in danger". So, apparent abductions and unexplained disappearances would still get police assistance like you would expect.

    1. Re:Sensationalist summary by advid.net · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, translation is:

      Allows you to search for a missing person, your family, to renew relations with her. Does not apply to missing persons in alarming conditions suspicious or criminal.

      So this kind of search is no longer available with the state help.
      Ok... Is it really worth a story on /. ?

    2. Re:Sensationalist summary by JeanCroix · · Score: 2

      So, apparent abductions and unexplained disappearances would still get police assistance like you would expect.

      But how can they know if it's a cleverly done abduction or not? So if you're a meticulous kidnapper, it's open season on adults in France now?

    3. Re:Sensationalist summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only if you leave out the important details and get people worked up over nothing. You know, standard operating procedure here.

    4. Re:Sensationalist summary by Zemran · · Score: 2

      ...starts dusting off the passport and packing some clothes and chloroform

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    5. Re:Sensationalist summary by ColdCat · · Score: 5, Informative

      It change almost nothing.
      This law was to find your family members after long lost of contacts (years). It was to help family member reconnect after end of WW1 WW2 and after the end of colonisation in Asia and Africa. The administration do the research find the person, the ask him/her if he want to reconnect with you and if he/she wants give you the address. It's stopped because fewer and fewer people use it in the last decade.

      If someone is missing, police still do the research.
      If Someone need to be found to pay kids pension, to helps his/her parents, for fraud or taxes evasion, or even for some kind of family Inheritance there are others laws.

    6. Re:Sensationalist summary by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Funny

      remember to keep it under 3oz or you might not get through airport security.

    7. Re:Sensationalist summary by bws111 · · Score: 3

      Simple. If the person went missing today (or very recently) they will do a normal 'missing person' investigation. If it is 'I wonder were cousin Pierre is, last I heard he was moving up north', they won't.

  6. Re:HELP!!! by boylinux · · Score: 3, Informative

    As per the article. Searches will continue for minors, and for those who disappear in worrying circumstances -- for example those with suicidal intent, or victims of a crime -- as they are conducted under a different procedure.

  7. They suggest hiring Liam Neeson by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    He has a very particular set of skills.

    1. Re:They suggest hiring Liam Neeson by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2

      Acting is not uncommon, even if particular.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  8. Status Update... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Status update: Kidnapped

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
  9. Misleading summary... by Guru80 · · Score: 2

    ..on /.?!? Unbelievable!! (only if you haven't ever been on /.) What we have here, ladies and gentlemen, is a typical non-story sensationalized by a partial summery to leave out the key information to in order to get the comments section worked up over nothing. Shouldn't editors at least check the story to ensure the summary isn't intentionally devoid of the facts?

  10. Re:HELP!!! by bws111 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem seems to be in the phrase 'missing person', which I guess is a translation thing. When people hear 'missing person', they think of someone who has suddenly disappeared - didn't come home from work, etc. Those cases they will still investigate, of course. What they are no longer doing is helping to find a person you have lost contact with (and I can't imagine their are many police forces in the world that would help with that under normal circumstances).

  11. Re:HELP!!! by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, taxpaying adults are shit out of luck

    Unlike children, adults have a right to disappear and start a new life somewhere else. Unless there is a reasonable suspicion that a law has been broken, the police should not be spending tax dollars to find people that don't want to be found.

  12. Re:HELP!!! by Frontier+Owner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought we used /. so we didn't have to read the article. someone posts a story, a brief exert and we move on.

  13. Re:HELP!!! by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    His children example was used for shockvalue, but the point is still the same - for the most part, if someone dissappears without a trace, foul play is involved. They MIGHT have just decided to skip town, but most people don't. Lets say its not your 9 year old daughter. Lets say your 23 year old daughter never comes home from work. I'd like to hear something besides "Check Facebook" from the local authorities.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  14. Problems with missing people searches on facebook by kasperd · · Score: 2
    There are many problems with searches for missing people using facebook. The most important problem is the lack of a trustworthy source. I would never take part in such a search, if the source is a person, I don't know. If you want me to take it serious, then link to the police' official page on the search. If the police doesn't want to put up such a page, then don't expect my participation.

    Harm can be done by spreading such a search on facebook, if it isn't legitimate.
    1. The person may already have been found, in which case you are just spamming. And you are decreasing the value of what could otherwise have been a useful communication channel.
    2. The person may never have been missing in the first place, and the entire search is nothing but harassment.
    3. The person may be hiding from abusive relatives, and you may inadvertently lead those abusive relatives directly to the victim.
    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?