African Soil Mapped For the Very First Time
vikingpower writes "A team of international experts has drawn up the Soil Atlas of Africa — the first such book mapping this key natural resource — to help farmers, land managers and policymakers understand the diversity and importance of soil and the need to manage it through sustainable use. A joint commission of the African Union and the European Union has produced a complete atlas of African soils, downloadable as three hefty PDFs (Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3). The initiative was announced four years ago, and is intended 'to help farmers, land managers and policymakers understand the diversity and importance of soil and the need to manage it through sustainable use.' A digital, interactive series of maps is (still) in the making."
That will fasten the pace in which virgin forest disappears and be replaced by farmland / mining activities
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
After reading the summary, I wonder if this could help farmers, land managers and policymakers understand the diversity and importance of soil and the need to manage it through sustainable use
I hate it when a summary repeats itself. I hate it when a summary repeats itself.
But will this help me identify which bits of Africa to dig up so I can make TVs and mobile phones for the 1st world? Can't see the point really.
I love virgin forests, it gives me wood
no comment
All the soil in Africa is made up of diamonds and zebra crap. Mostly diamonds.
The only reason You would map someone else's soil is to decide if it's worth invading them to take it away.
sorry
This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
This *is* about the market (and Western investors jumping onto the land/resources grab to expropriate everything of agricultural value). Imperialists coming in to map your resources is like burglars snooping around to case a joint --- "we're just peeping through the windows to help survey the quantity and location of valuables in this house."
Improving agriculture through scientific management of soil resources can be a good thing --- but the good is gained when this knowledge is *disseminated to help the people,* not *concentrated to help the wealthy.* Instead of mapping soils to fill a comprehensive UN almanac, spread resources (simple equipment and knowledge) so that *local communities* can *map their own soil,* and manage/improve their own resources (no need to centralize the information on a continental scale). Investors in London, Berlin, and New York should not be the ones to know soil conditions --- the farmers and communities *living on top of the soil* are the ones who should be empowered to collect and interpret this information.
This *is* about the market (and Western investors jumping onto the land/resources grab to expropriate everything of agricultural value). Imperialists coming in to map your resources is like burglars snooping around to case a joint --- "we're just peeping through the windows to help survey the quantity and location of valuables in this house."
Here I find EU as I know it: pure evil. I wonder how long before we people of Europe manage to get rid of it.
This map and it's resources are publicly available, any one can use it, to start with the local governments of Africa.
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
You American!
"The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
This map and it's resources are publicly available, any one can use it, to start with the local governments of Africa.
Most of those are more worried about continuing to exist, and wondering if they or the warlords have more AK-47s.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Knowledge is power, power can liberate or oppress, but this knowledge is in the open, meaning nobody has distinct power advantage because of access to this knowledge alone. Besides, this isn't local knowledge, it covers the entire continent. The map is unlikely to be used directly by local farmers living hand to mouth on the family plot. Rather it will be used by governments and NGO's to make better use of infrastructure funds for irrigation channels, grain silo's, etc. Yes it will also be used by corporations, but what those corporations do with it is ultimately at the mercy of the people. You can like or loath agribusiness, but if they disappeared tomorrow 3-4 billion people would starve to death in the following 6-12 months.
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
It disturbs me a bit to see EU associated to something actually useful to mankind. Usually it only cares about the market. I must have missed a point.
Someone moderated that "troll". I would be interested if that person could explain to me why (by private message if you do not want to undo your moderation). Note that I wrote EU, which I do not confuse with council of Europe or with multilateral projects between european countries, such as the ESA.