Slashdot Mirror


With Sales Down, Whale Meat Flogged As Source of Strength

beaverdownunder writes "From the Australian Broadcasting Corporation: 'Japan's peak whaling body has launched a new campaign to promote whale meat as a nutritious food that enhances physical strength and reduces fatigue. With about 5,000 tonnes of whale meat sitting unwanted in freezers around Japan, the country's Institute for Cetacean Research has decided to launch a new campaign to promote the by-product of its so-called scientific whaling program. Once popular in school lunches, younger generations of Japanese rarely, if ever, eat whale."

6 of 311 comments (clear)

  1. so... by Pubstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why didn't the poster just include the last sentence so that the summary is just TFA? Also, I wonder how this is being covered on slashdot.jp.

  2. Re:Europeans by Teun · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yes so?

    When extinction became an issue civilised nations agreed to stop whaling.
    The exceptions are for indigenous populations like those living in polar regions and some scientific work.
    As a result in the short term whales are no longer threatened by extinction but in the long term they still face threats.
    Japan's excuse would be laughable if it weren't for the fact when all previous whaling nations would do the same the problem of extinction would surface again.

    Where a great nation shows child-like behaviour.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  3. Re:May Bel-Shamharoth eat their souls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And maybe the Australians should start sinking whaling ships that breach Australia's exclusive economic zone or territorial waters to hunt whales illegally against international and local laws.... not that I care about the bloody whales, only that they think they should be exempt from international law.

  4. Re:May Bel-Shamharoth eat their souls by Luckyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They claim they want to prove that whales are numerous enough to again allow for commercial whaling, and that such proof would be impossible to gather without research. Assuming you see whales as just another resource, like fish, this is a reasonable stance to take.

    The underlying issue is that many countries want a total moratorium on whaling for cultural reasons. Japan and several other countries with long culture of whaling view this as insanity and see whales as the same as any other nautical resource. In a way they are right, many of modern fish stocks are in much worse condition then many of the whale stocks, but because many of the countries that want total moratorium have severe vested interests in fishing but no whaling, they deflect attention from painful decisions that need to be taken in regards to fishery policy by focusing attention on whaling which is essentially free for them - as they do not have a whaling fleet or culture of whaling.

  5. Ok, so if no-one is eating it, why bother with it? by jonwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If people aren't interested in eating whale meat, why not just give up on the hunt and stop killing the things?
    Continuing to produce a product no-one is interested in (and that large swathes of the rest of the world would rather you didn't produce) seems stupid to me, especially if they have to divert money from tsunami relief to pay for it.

    Is it because of lobbying by the whale fishermen? Concerns from the government about where all the people involved in the industry are gonna get jobs if the industry is shut down? National pride? (i.e. "we have been catching whales for decades, why should we stop now just because someone else tells us to") Something else?

  6. Re:May Bel-Shamharoth eat their souls by stoploss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What part of "sitting unwanted in freezers" and "killing whales" is part of your moronic idea of popluation study? Oh! The Bald Eagle is Endangered.... Guess What's For Dinner! Get bent you idiot.

    Just an FYI: not all whale species are endangered. You can see some examples here (prepare to give your L type cones a function test):
    Humpback whale, Minke whale, Southern Right whale.

    As you can see, those species are listed as "Least Concern" by the IUCN, which happens to be the same category that the sewer rat receives. There have been allegations that endangered whales have been killed by the Japanese whaling industry, which is obviously reprehensible.

    BTW, there have also been allegations that the "Least Concern" bald eagle (oh, also FYI: it's no longer endangered) have been killed by the Amish chicken farming industry.

    I don't really have an opinion on the ethics of whaling "least concern" whale species. I consider that concept similar to the beef industry. Why is killing and eating cow acceptable if killing and eating non-threatened whale species is not? Of course, you will notice that the ethical consideration is orthogonal to the legality consideration.

    I am vegetarian, so I am not faced with cognitive dissonance about the situation, but I don't care which animals that other people eat if it isn't actively promoting extinction of a species.