Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Confirms Xbox One's Phone Home Requirement, Game Resale Rules

Following the confusion surrounding Microsoft's announcement of the Xbox One, the company has now clarified many of the hot-button issues in a set of posts on their official site. First, they confirmed that the console will need to phone home in order to continue playing games. On your primary console, you'd need to connect to the internet and check in once every 24 hours. They also announced that you'll be able to access and play any of your games by logging in on somebody else's console, but the internet connection will be required every hour to keep playing that way. Other media don't require the connection. Microsoft also explained how game licensing will work. On the upside, anyone using your console will be able to play your games, and you can share your games with up to 10 members of your family for free. The downside is the news about used games; Microsoft says they've "designed Xbox One so game publishers can enable you to trade in your games at participating retailers." The key word there is can, which implies that you can't without the publisher's express permission. Finally, the company made a set of statements about how Kinect's audio and video sensors will collect and share your data. "When Xbox One is on and you're simply having a conversation in your living room, your conversation is not being recorded or uploaded." They also say data gathered during normal use won't leave the console without your explicit permission.

18 of 581 comments (clear)

  1. Deal breaker by senorpoco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well that just saved me the equivalent of whatever the new console would cost. Thanks microsoft for making purchasing decisions easier.

    1. Re:Deal breaker by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would Sony be loving it? If history is anything to go by then Sony will be at least as worse, the difference is that unlike Microsoft they're just not being open about it. If anything it seems more like Microsoft is testing the waters to see what they can get away with, if there really is just way too much negative feedback they'll likely losen the restrictions somewhat. In contrast Sony's business model is, as always, keep quiet and just dump it on the user saying nothing and hope no one notices.

      I don't really like any of it (though at least the ability to share games with family members is a step forward, because that's better than most DRM/unlock codes on existing platforms where you're expected to buy a copy per family member) but pretending Sony is going to be some magical saviour is sad. We saw the Sony fanboys spreading the exact same FUD and doing the exact same thing last console round and look how that ended up. Removed features etc.

      Anyone pretending Sony is going to be a saviour right now given that we've not even seen a picture of their fucking device yet let alone had any real concrete information about it is having a laugh, especially when track records are taken into account.

    2. Re:Deal breaker by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a PS3 but bought it after Linux was already removed.

      Being a PS3 owner and not having had the feature removed from me personally though doesn't mean I magically have to give them a free pass because guess what? I'm not a fanboy.

      Removing features from customers is still a fucking shitty move however you cut it and guess what? Microsoft are twats for adding more and more ads to XBL when I already pay them for the service, Nintendo are twats for selling me a turd that never ended up with any compelling games, Apple are twats for being such restrictive power hungry patent trolls, and Google are twats for being such a bunch of tax dodging idiots.

      You know, it is possible to hate companies for all piss poor anti-consumer moves. I'm a customer so I don't owe them a thing, I have no vested interest in defending them and I have every interest in calling them all out when they do bad things.

      But what makes your post so utterly sad is that what you're basically saying is that you're disappointed that I called Sony out with the implication that I shouldn't have, that I should give them a free pass and focus on just the bad things of other companies. Do you know why you think that? Because you're a fanboy. The very thing you're criticising.

    3. Re:Deal breaker by Shemmie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I totally agree. Owned (and loved owning) two 360's, but I won't be touching the One with a barge pole. Microsoft seems to have taken the relative success of the 360 as a "Well, now we can do what the fuck we like".

  2. Worse than Thought by Traciatim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, in other words, all of the hyperbole and hand waving from users on forums that was washed aside saying it couldn't possibly be that bad... instead it turns out it's worse.

  3. But you can still watch TV... by selectspec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love that part. You mean I can still watch TV without "checking in", just as I could if I hadn't bought the stupid fucking box in the first place?

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  4. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "When Xbox One is on and you're simply having a conversation in your living room, your conversation is not being recorded or uploaded." They also say data gathered during normal use won't leave the console without your explicit permission.

    "Explicit permission" defined as signing any EULA associated with XBOX One.

  5. I'm sure XBox won't record our conversations... by Nova+Express · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...just like I'm sure the Obama Administration would never obtain the phone and email records for every American!

    What?

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  6. First game system you can't keep a collection of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Think about what happens after this generation is over, in 10-15 years. Eventually, the XBO servers will be taken down, and none of the games will work.

    It won't be like you pulling out your Dreamcast or SNES to relive fond gaming memories--this literally won't be an option. Now starts the time when gaming history eventually fades into nothing.

    Don't get me wrong, any disc based game eventually will be in the same boat--as these discs will eventually decay. Whereas cartridge based game systems may work, no problem, in 100 years or more if kept in a dry place.

  7. Re:That doesn't fix anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > the used game resale options are in the hands of the game developers

    Which is funny because were I live it's in the hand of the law. The law that says "I can resell my own games."

  8. Re:10 Minutes by xclr8r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This really sucks for those who go to places with lack of communication infrastructure. e.g. military, rural areas with electricity but no internet backbone. Obviously they are not the "intended" audience.

    --
    Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
  9. Re:*cough* bullshit *cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Uh huh. And if I'm a Xbox non-owner who has no EULA with Microsoft, and I go visit my friend's house who has an Xbox and we have a conversation in his living room that gets recorded..?

  10. The elephant in the room: Rentals by BenJeremy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the bigger issue missed here is that rentals are simply no longer possible with Xbox One.

    Microsoft has killed the game rental market in one fell swoop.

    Personally, I think this is a dumb move... I've bought many games after trying them out as rentals; I doubt I am alone with that practice. That is a lot of potential marketing tossed down the toilet.

    Even if the used game market survives (though I doubt it will ever be a factor again), the rental market is gone, gone,gone.

  11. Re:...and people will buy it anyway. by ganjadude · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to be fair, people are not "buying windows 8" they are buying new PCs and laptops that happen to have windows 8 on them. the avg user still does not know he has choices and they just buy the new shiney and leave it stock

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  12. Re:That doesn't fix anything by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In some nations what you describe would be illegal. Some places have this thing called consumer protection and depriving the consumer of something he paid for would be basically the same as fraud.

  13. Re: That doesn't fix anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, we understand and acknowledge that these companies want to claim "it's not a sale, it's a license" just fine. We just disagree with the legality of it.

    Especially when these companies want to treat it as a license when it benefits them, but then as a sale when that is more beneficial.

    Doubly so when all the advertisements say "own/buy it today!".

  14. Re:That doesn't fix anything by twistedsymphony · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The problem isn't with used sales, the problem is that they're changing from a product model to a license model that requires authentication. Just because the publisher are given control over how the license works doesn't solve the problem of when the authentication servers eventually shut down giving you a nice collection of coasters.

    As someone who still owns and occasionally plays many of the games bought new in the late 80s early 90s this bothers me... I have no interest in buying games with an expiration date.

  15. Why would anyone ever agree to any of this by Sheik+Yerbouti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Always on camera, every 24 hours license checks, you have to ask permission to resell your games. If you agree to this you're a chump full stop.