Slashdot Mirror


Intelligence Director Claims NSA Surveillance Reports Inaccurate

Nerval's Lobster writes "James R. Clapper, the nation's Director of National Intelligence, claimed that recent reports about the NSA monitoring Americans' Internet and phone communications are inaccurate. 'The Guardian and The Washington Post articles refer to collection of communications pursuant to Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,' he wrote in a June 6 statement. 'They contain numerous inaccuracies.' While the statement didn't detail the supposed inaccuracies, it explained why the monitoring described in those articles would, at least in theory, violate the law. 'Section 702 is a provision of FISA that is designed to facilitate the acquisition of foreign intelligence information concerning non-U.S. persons located outside the United States,' it read. 'It cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. citizen, any other U.S. person, or anyone located within the United States.' Those newspaper articles describe an NSA project codenamed Prism, which allegedly taps into the internal databases of nine major technology companies: Microsoft, Google, Yahoo, Facebook, PalTalk, YouTube, Skype, AOL, and Apple. Both publications drew their information from an internal PowerPoint presentation used to train intelligence operatives. Speaking to Slashdot, Google, Microsoft and Facebook all again denied knowledge of Prism; the Google spokesperson suggested he didn't 'have any insight' into why Google would have appeared in the NSA's alleged PowerPoint presentation. But many, many questions remain."

8 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. With Friends Like These, Who Needs Watchmen? by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course the NSA doesn't spy on American citizens. That's against the law.

    What they do is allow friendly foreign agents -- like the UK -- to spy on American citizens, and then they share the data together. It's totally different and completely legal.

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  2. Inaccurate, sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But only because the reality is worse!

    Or did people forget about how the FBI uses Carnivore and its successors, or that the NSA has had Echelon in continuous operation? The companies that are protesting that they don't willingly hand over the data are probably right, the NSA is probably tapping the datacenters and ISPs directly without telling anyone concerned (see the fiasco at AT&T for instance).

  3. google glass, anyone? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Funny

    James R. Clapper, the nation's Director of National Intelligence, issued the following statement:
    "The NSA and FBI wish to thank wish to thank Google and the glassholes for contributing to the panopticon and bringing us real-time insights into the daily activities of terrorists and potential terrorists (the two categories of citizens) nationwide."

  4. Verbal loophole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That is very well crafted response. Look at what he says "'It cannot be used to intentionally target any U.S. citizen...." - INTENTIONALLY target is key there. They aren't intentionally targeting anyone. They are doing a broad sweep of everyone's data, then analyzing it, at which point they an argue for probable cause and then intentionally target an individual within the scope of the law. Words matter

  5. Re:Cue the consiracy theorists.... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just because you're paranoid doesn't mean the government isn't spying on all your activities.

  6. Re:"No Insight" - What they really mean by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do also notice that they're only protesting that they don't spy on U.S. citizens; they never actually say they do not allow direct access to everyone from outside the U.S.

  7. Re:what gets me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before the leak: "Yeah whatever, put your tinfoil hat back on"
    After the leak: "Cool story bro. We've all known this all along. Why are you making such a fuss"

  8. popup: are you sure? by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This was my favorite part of the WaPo article:

    There has been “continued exponential growth in tasking to Facebook and Skype,” according to the PRISM slides. With a few clicks and an affirmation that the subject is believed to be engaged in terrorism, espionage or nuclear proliferation, an analyst obtains full access to Facebook’s “extensive search and surveillance capabilities against the variety of online social networking services.”

    so, you enter a name to access his full facebook profile, and there's a popup - are you reasonably sure he's a terrorist? yes/no" I'm glad to know there are safeguards in place!