Slashdot Mirror


Steubenville Hacker Faces Longer Prison Sentence Than the Rapists

joeflies writes "In a previous Slashdot article, hackers worked to preserve content for the Steubenville rape case. The two football players charged received juvenile detention sentences of one and two years. One of the hackers, on the other hand, faces 10 years in prison."

28 of 297 comments (clear)

  1. Aghast by zeigerpuppy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am literally speechless.

    1. Re:Aghast by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Rather than flamebait, I would salute the GP for the ingenious satire of the very thought process which led to the sentences being as lopsided as they are.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:Aghast by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's ingenious satire for the thought process which most Americans share. Remember the journalists' coverage of the event? They didn't give a shit about the rape victim, they just whined about how these vile rapists' careers were destroyed. Worse yet, the journalists who said this were women themselves.

  2. This is SO WRONG !! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The system is totally fucked up, and I mean, TOTALLY FUCKED UP !!!

    Never in my life I could imaging the government in the United States could be so fucked up !

    Not only they broke the CONSTITUTION with their phone tapping and their PRISM, now they are doing that to the people who volunteered their skill to preserve what needed to preserve - THE EVIDENCES which had helped the prosecutors in that rape case !!

    FUCK MAN !!!

    United States is NO LONGER the land of the free, and those who live in it are no longer the braves, either !!!

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:This is SO WRONG !! by quenda · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Could be worse. If the hackers had exposed government coverup of murders, they would be tortured and charged with a capitol crime.

      Lets spare a though for Bradley Manning here, whose torture and trial have barely rated a mention in the US media, unlike Steubenville.

      United States is NO LONGER the land of the free,

      Was it ever? Highest imprisonment rate in the world now, even worse than Russia.

    2. Re: This is SO WRONG !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So the crimes revealed are faked? Or are they just not as important as Bradley not liking his C.O.?

      He UPHELD his oath to support the constitution.

      The apache heli pilot and gunner VIOLATED their oaths.

      And since you're not at war, he cannot, even if he was working for Al Quaida directly as a mole, commit treason.

    3. Re: This is SO WRONG !! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Manning committed treason and violated his oaths

      Manning's most important oath is to defend the Constitution against enemies domestic - that oath takes precedent over any others. And it's exactly what he did.

      Besides that, how can you possibly not have learned the lesson Nuremberg?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:This is SO WRONG !! by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, it seems like it's the same freedom you had under dictatorships

      The most productive slaves are those who think they are free.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:This is SO WRONG !! by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So what you're saying is that people should feel an obligation to forever remain in the place they happened to be born in, and deciding to move somewhere populated by more like minded people and governments is a bad thing?

  3. dat justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So... hacking into a fratboy's fb account is a more serious charge than raping the everloving shit out of someone?

    Any tips on bulk-order condoms and hockey masks?

    1. Re:dat justice by Dthief · · Score: 4, Insightful
      From the article it appears that he is being charged with hacking the school website in order to upload the video, not being charged for preserving the content for authorities.

      That being said, I still think the relative sentences are really out of whack, and that rapists (even juveniles) should absolutely be more harshly punished than hackers who do not hack in a way that causes significant harm.

      --
      www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
    2. Re:dat justice by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Keep in mind that "Significant harm" usually means the victim now has to spend lots of money upgrading the security that they never had in the first place. Because, after all, they would never had needed that if it wasn't for said hacker right?

  4. Juveniles get different sentences to adults. by blarkon · · Score: 5, Informative

    Juveniles get different sentences to adults. "Vigilante Hacker" is an adult and the reported possible sentence is "maximum possible" which is quite different to "an actual sentence".

    1. Re:Juveniles get different sentences to adults. by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Juveniles" who commit "adult" acts of rape . . . aren't really "juveniles" any more.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:Juveniles get different sentences to adults. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reading some of the responses to your post, I think people are missing your point. So. I am going to rephrase it so that they might understand.

      The summary compares apples to oranges. It compares the sentence which the rapists actually received to the maximum sentence that the hacker MIGHT receive. The rapists MIGHT have received a much stiffer sentence than they did and it would be a travesty of justice if the hacker DID receive a sentence longer than that received by the rapists.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  5. FTG by AndyKron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But it's OK for the government to hack everybody, all the time. FTG

  6. perversion of justice by MoFoQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must say...it is a perversion of justice, puns not intended.

    I may need to write to one of my local reps, Zoe Lofgren who's working to change the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to make it "less vague" and have her add some other reforms.
    Sure, "hacking" for vigilantism is wrong and two wrongs don't make it right, but neither does three: throwing the book at Deric Lostutter.

    heck, that guy in texas who killed that escort got less

  7. predictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The rapist is a danger to the individual. The hacker is a danger to the government. Now you know which is held in higher regard in our new fundamentally reshaped America.

  8. "could get" vs "did get." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    article is BS.. comparing "could get" vs "did get" and getting slashdot nerds in a lather for no valid reason as if they were impressionable rush limbuagh listeners.

  9. Re:stop comparing apples and oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't make sense to compare actual sentences (and in this case juvenile sentences!) with theoretical maximums for adult defendants

    What they did, the way they fingered that poor girl, took video of it, and then spread the vid to everybody they knew, -- if that happened to your daughter, would you still say that it's a "juvenile" case ?

  10. Such Reasonable Action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From Mojo:

    At first, he thought the FBI agent at the door was with FedEx. "As I open the door to greet the driver, approximately 12 FBI SWAT team agents jumped out of the truck, screaming for me to 'Get the fuck down!' with M-16 assault rifles and full riot gear, armed, safety off, pointed directly at my head," Lostutter wrote today on his blog. "I was handcuffed and detained outside while they cleared my house."

    That's either an intimidation tactic or the geniuses at the FBI have seen too many Rambo reruns. A 12 person SWAT team to serve a search warrant on one person who they have no reason to believe is violent? If it was proportional, they would have sent an armored division to arrest the rapists. Somehow I doubt they did.

    1. Re:Such Reasonable Action by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's the ongoing paramilitarization of law enforcement.

      In my sleepy little city in a rural corner of my State, our 8-member police department has 2 armored vehicles, 28 fully-automatic machine guns, 2 grenade launchers, and routinely engages in military-style exercises on weekends where they set up Soviet-style checkpoints and violate peoples' civil rights. People have been bringing this up at city council meetings only to be told by the council members that this type of activity is necessary to keep us safe - the typical GOP line.

      Even my "Tea Party" congressman, who ran on the "Tea Party" platform, has been completely silent on the recent revelations about government spying on American Citizens, instead focusing his efforts on the GOP's scandal-du-jour, usually whatever bullet list of talking points Sean Hannity is vomiting on his radio show that day.

      All of it is paid for by the Federal Government's various drug and terrorism interdiction programs - and we're not even in a border state, unless you count the Atlantic Ocean to be a high-drug-traffic border.

  11. Juvenile sentencing is less than adult sentencing by GrumpySteen · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is nothing new. We, as a society, recognized long ago that children do stupid shit and sometimes shouldn't receive the full punishment for their actions.

    If the Steubenville rapists had been tried as adults (and I think they should have), they would have been facing up to 25 years in prison. Under certain circumstances, Ohio law allows for a sentence of life in prison for someone convicted of rape, too, but I don't think that applies to those two. As it is, they not only have their sentences, but they're going to be added to the sex offender list for anywhere from ten years to life. They're going to find it very difficult to find jobs and places to live while they're on that list.

    There's nothing shockingly disproportionate about a maximum of 10 years for hacking vs a maximum of 25/life for rape. You might argue about the specific numbers, but I think everyone will agree that rape is the more serious crime and Ohio law allows for more serious consequences, just as it should.

  12. Re:All I can say is ... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since when has voting ever been enough? You need to join activist organizations. Volunteer for campaigns. Write letters to your representatives (look what letter writing did to SOPA).

    The idea that being a couch potato for two years, then driving down to the polls and casting a vote is enough is ridiculous.

    Real change isn't something that happens that passively. Learn some history. Look what it took to get the Civil Rights Act passed.

  13. Re:Survival vs Copping out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please lower your voice or you'll end up in Gitmo.

  14. Re:Survival vs Copping out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The USA has the highest incarceration rate in the world. Individuals who believe in civil rights have often been targeted by the government and imprisoned by the government (see: citizens of Japanese-decent during WW2, the labor movement during the 1930s, the many various human rights movements, the Black Panthers, Nixon's spying on the Democratic Party Headquarters, etc etc etc). The glaringly racist drug policies (see: powdered cocaine vs crack sentencing) and systemic poverty have combined to create a wonderful system of ethnic cleansing for Young Black Males, no barbwire required.

     

  15. sentence RECIEVED v maximum possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While you're not speaking, re-read the article or summary. They compare the sentence someone involved actually received to the maximum possible sentence any hacker could theoretically get. Most commonly, a first time offender "facing ten years" will end up with probation. At this point, we have no idea what punishment the hacker will get, if any at all.

  16. Re:Survival vs Copping out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OTOH, those who did cop-out, didn't end up in the oven ...

    In fact, some of those ended up in places where they could do something about it; places like Oak Ridge, TN and Los Alamos, NM. The Jews (among others) paid an horrific price to re-learn something they should never have forgotten. You don't submit weakly to tyrrany. You don't just move a little bit down the road when a pogrom razes your town. Despite their many faults, at least the Israelis got that.

    Now, if only the USA can re-learn what folly was Nazi Germany ...

    The jews never submitted weakly to tyrany. Like the communists, roma, homosexuals and others they took arms up, and rioted and turned the ghettos up side down at war with the nazi oppressor.

    And they all got killed, because good intentions dont mean shit when your outnumbered by a well funded military killing machine.

    Stop pushing this idea that the jews just weakly went to the chambers. its bad history and its blatantly untrue.