Slashdot Mirror


Chemists Build App That Could Identify Cheap Replacements For Luxury Wines

schliz writes "Australian startup Wine Cue is combining the chemical composition of wines with customer ratings for what it hopes to be a more objective wine recommendation engine than existing systems that are based on historical transactions. The technology is likely to reach the market as a smartphone app, and could be used to identify cheap alternatives to expensive bottles."

4 of 206 comments (clear)

  1. Re:first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, exactly.

    And this had better be an Android-only app.

    The absolute last thing an IDevice owner wants to know is that his/her expensive purchase is objectively inferior to a cheaper alternative.

    The horror! The horror!

  2. Re:Technology can't replicate everything.... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >I'm not a wine snob, but I know there are certain things that sometimes you *can't* replicate.

    You're clearly also not a chemist either.

    >After decades of analysis, we still can't build a violin as good as a Stradivarius.

    No, what we can't do is build a violin that self-proclaimed audiophiles say is as good as a Stradivarius during NON-BLIND TESTS in UNCONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS. If you administer proper double-blind tests then you'll find that there's no difference.

    >We still can't fully replicate Damascus Steel

    Talk to a metallurgist. Modern steel actually performs better. I'm not sure how much effort has been given to duplication, but why try to duplicate something when you already have a better replacement?

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  3. Re:Technology can't replicate everything.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Strad's aren't any better sounding than brand new violins.

  4. Re:Technology can't replicate everything.... by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It always amuses the hell out of me when people think there were these amazing ancient technologies so much better than anything modern. It is like they think various videogames and novels are real and that we study the knowledge of the ancients to advance what we have, despite all evidence to the contrary.

    As you say, all this stuff is bullshit. In terms of violins we can, if anything, build even better violins today because of better material selection and manufacturing techniques. The thing that makes Stradivarius sought after is its rarity. It is a special thing to own one, as there aren't many. That then of course leads to a mystique and to people making bullshit claims.

    Same kind of thing with Damascus Steel. It has been claimed to be able to do things like cut through a gun barrel, which of course it can't do (gun barrels are amazingly tough objects). We can do better with modern metallurgy and processes (like an industrial hammer forge). The reason there's research to replicating Damascus Steel is because it is neat, it was very advanced for the time and it would be of historical interest to understand how it was done. We can do better, and indeed do all the time.