Slashdot Mirror


India To Develop Military Robots For Warfare

WoodenKnight writes "Indian DRDO chief Avinash Chander has told reporters that development of robotic soldiers would be one of his 'priority thrust areas', saying that 'unmanned warfare in land and air is the future of warfare.' He foresees robotic soldiers assisting human soldiers initially but, he hinted at forward-position deployment of such robots. He gave a timeline of at least a decade for the project to see any practical use but said a number of labs in India are now working on this."

13 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. seems a bit specialized for the current state by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you have well-developed robotics expertise already, you're in a much better position to develop more specialized robots, like robot soldiers. India doesn't really: both its robotics industry and its research are relatively small sectors at the moment, far behind the state of the art in countries like Japan, China, Germany, South Korea, or the USA. They're going to have to fix that before robot soldiers are going to emerge out of it.

    Of course, this might just be a way of selling robotics funding, so maybe that's the goal.

    1. Re:seems a bit specialized for the current state by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On the other hand, if you are trying to get funding for basic research approved, attaching weapons to your grant proposal can be very helpful indeed...

      Since actually getting a robot to kill somebody(in a manner more sophisticated than a land mine) requires all sorts of other capabilities to be worked out first, you can just write "Killer Robots OMG National Security" on your application and then spend a decade doing the basic research you actually wanted to do anyway.

    2. Re:seems a bit specialized for the current state by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Robots killing people is fairly easy, simple motion activated systems combined with range finding and ballistics algorithms will do the trick. Add facial/body type/gait recognition to keep it from going after so many shadows.

      Getting them to do that while also not killing the right people is the hard part.

  2. Robots... by kryliss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will the robots be able to handle their own tech support should they have an issue?

    --
    --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  3. Inevitable... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hello, this is Fred who-is-definitely-not-from-Hyderabad, thank you for calling killbot technical support, how can I help you today?"

    "Hi Fred, I'm afraid my killbot has been refusing all targeting instructions and attempting to kill me."

    "Ah, let me check with my supervisor, one moment please."

    "Thank you for your patience. Please try turning it off and never turning it on again."

  4. India? Robots in the front line? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Very surprised. Though no country wants to risk the lives of their soldiers, only in the USA soldiers in body bags have such a heavy political price. India being a Democracy it too would pay a higher political price than, may be Pakistan and China. But still it is a highly populated country without draft. In fact, even in the USA, after the draft has been removed and it became an all volunteer armed forces, the political cost of returning body bags have dropped a lot. So why robots in the forward firing lines? May be it is posturing, goading Pakistan into spending its money on robots instead of supplying terrorists with cheap AK-47s.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. Those who ignore science fiction ... by Liambp · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..are doomed to repeat it.

  6. Reality TV by canadiannomad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok so this will likely lead to robot vs robot warfare with no real human casualties... So, I say we put that shit on TV and enjoy :) /joke
    Nah, I don't see any way for this to escalate badly /sarcasm

    --
    I wish I didn't have to put tags for people who don't get humour.

    --
    Hmm, the humour and sarcasm seem to have been be lost on you.
  7. Re:Ban it before it gets out of hand! by AmazingRuss · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...so only those that abide by the treaty won't have them.

    Like it or not, this is the future.

  8. Re: Oblig by JustOK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The US shares a border with it's biggest enemy. In fact, the US and it's biggest enemy are on the same side of the border.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  9. Re:Metal Gear by dpilot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I disagree. IMHO war has generally been about egos, and resources are frequently the excuse. Assuming we managed to come up with efficient and logical machines, they would most likely come up with some more efficient way to get their resources than war.

    However if they were to decide that war was the most efficient way, watch out!

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  10. Easier route to escalation by Lazarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've always thought that a lot of people don't realize that having lives in harms way on -either- side of a is a deterrent in itself to using weapons that would be horribly beyond all conscience (that in itself, well, depends on who's pushing the buttons). India and Pakistan say, have nuclear weapons. If Pakistan had a few infantry and tank divisions, along with a couple border villages wiped out by robotic troops, I'd think that the bar would be lowered as to them responding with a tactical nuclear strike to eliminate the robot threat. Then things would snowball from there. The situation wouldn't go from escalating from conventional to chemical in between at all. War is about killing people. When one side has troops that are machines, the other side does not have to restrain themselves to the moral restraints that have kept whatever tenuous leash on us throughout our history. Just a thought.

  11. It's COMPLETE nonsense by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...honestly, not even worth reporting.

    1) India has trouble building tanks, airplanes, ships, and subs...far more 'pedestrian' tools of warfare. Their programs are bloated and rife with corruption, delays, technical failures, overpromises, etc. such that they are only capable of producing inferior equipment at ridiculous costs.

    2) India is the second most populous country in the world. If there's anything they DON'T need it's to replace the dirt-cheap organic, self-replicating, minimally-functional dubious cannon fodder they currently have with hideously expensive, fragile, dubious cannon fodder made out of plastic and metal that they don't have and likely will never be able to build for the foreseeable future.

    --
    -Styopa