Slashdot Mirror


The Rails Girls Are Coming to a City Near You (Video)

So far, the Rails Girls have groups in cities ranging from Warsaw to Wellington, with U.S. gatherings in Washington D.C., Charlotte NC, San Francisco CA, and... let's make it easy: Here's a map. OMG! They're everywhere! Actually, mostly Europe, being as they started in Finland, same as the Leningrad Cowboys and a popular computer operating system. But they're spreading like mad. Would you believe the reason one of the two founders originally got interested in Ruby on Rails was because she wanted to make a fan page for American politician Al Gore? Our interviewee, Magda (from Rails Girls Warsaw), swears this is true. She also tells us about their upcoming Washington D.C. workshop on June 13th, 2013, in conjunction with the June 14-15 RubyNation event. Sounds like fun, doesn't it. Maybe you need more of this kind of fun where you live, eh? If there isn't a Rails Girls group near you, maybe you should start one and help more women and girls get into programming. This is the Rails Girls' goal. Any particular ages? Not really. And their workshops are all free of charge: "You just need to be excited!"

162 comments

  1. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure about that? Hope you're a fan of neckbeards...

  2. Re:Naked? by narcc · · Score: 1, Funny

    There really isn't any other reason to get excited about RoR.

    I thought that fad was dead?

  3. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flame war incoming.

  4. Humane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy who invented Ruby wanted the language to be "humane". Apparently, he succeeded.

  5. Advert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Totally not a paid advertisement...

  6. /. editors, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the love of god, stop snorting so much cocaine before writing a summary. Have some restraint and wait until afterwards.

    1. Re:/. editors, please... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Just how often do you think /. editors get offered blow to put up a story? They've got to get while the getting is good.

      Most days all they get are free, useless books and blowjobs (metaphorical and otherwise) from Dice HR drones.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:/. editors, please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think it was an exciting summary. I also feel very confident after reading it, as if I could do anything.

  7. Re:Naked? by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its great getting women into programming... but seriously, ruby on rails is shit.

  8. OMG Ponies! by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is this the thread where fat bearded forever alone guys make fun of girls doing stuff they do without needing their help or approval?

    1. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also will have to deal with "bronies."

    2. Re:OMG Ponies! by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If by "make fun" you mean "unleash a torrent of abuse," then, apparently, yes.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    3. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then let's get this started!

      The feminist fantasy always runs the same way. A tough no nonsense woman tries to break in to an all male sphere. To prove herself she must first pass, no, exceed the ridiculous and unnecessarily high standards which men diabolically erected hundreds or even thousands of years ago in preparation for this very day. At first the 1 dimensional macho characters all mock and deride her. But eventually they come to learn that she is every bit as tough as the guys are, in addition to her extra abilities which she has by virtue of being a woman. Ultimately they can’t help but respect her determination and ability, and dare I say it, girl power. She’s “opened the door”, and now women eagerly flood into the previously all male sphere! Roll credits.

    4. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the thread where fat bearded forever alone guys make fun of girls doing stuff they do without needing their help or approval?

      You would be right, but... Who the fuck uses RoR still? I thought we were over that after the 55th systemic vulnerability finally put the last nail in the coffin...

    5. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would have thought that "evaling" random URL parameters, HTTP headers or JSON requests would cause security problems?!?

    6. Re:OMG Ponies! by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah those guys are a bunch of fat ugly (not that people should be judged by their looks, or we should promite thinness as a body image) pussy faggots (not that there's anything wrong with being a woman, or gay) who can't get laid (not that women are sex objects or we should promote an image of manlyness that involve having sex with lots of women).

      I bet these guys are just bitter cause they got bullied in school while all the girls got with the cool kids (bullying's ok when they aren't gay, right?)

    7. Re:OMG Ponies! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      or we should promite thinness as a body image

      No, we should be promoting a having healthy BMI as a body image. Being too thin or too fat (obviously the latter is far more common in western society) is unhealthy, and would should not be trying to teach our kids that it's OK to be fat, because it's not if we care about their long-term health and longevity.

    8. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fat bearded alone guy think warsaw chicks hot. must dl video.

    9. Re:OMG Ponies! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2

      No, we should be promoting a having healthy BMI as a body image.

      BMI is actually a poor measure of health on an individual basis, as it doesn't distinguish fat from muscle. Body fat percentage is what we really need to be aware of. It's hard to measure accurately, though; skinfold or electrical impedance tests can help you track whether your own is going up or down but are hard to accurately translate into absolute numbers.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:OMG Ponies! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      BMI is close enough for most of the population. Only athletes need to worry about the fat/muscle problem.

      However, even back in the 90s, I remember getting body fat percentage tests done which used some handheld electronic tool that (I was told) used IR light to measure the fat, upon being applied to the arm at the bicep. It reported an absolute number. Of course, I have no idea how accurate this really was, but it was used on me in health fairs in college.

    11. Re:OMG Ponies! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Get with the program, dude. Ponies are now FOR the fat bearded forever alone guys.

      [I kid of. Plenty of us no fat bearded forever alone guys like ponies too]

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no beard you insensitive clod!

    13. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, my wife and two daughters, all programmers are laughing and making jokes about this right now. When they get done I can ask them what they think about needing support from anybody to follow the career path of their choosing.

      Seriously, they find all of this, "helping the poor wittle girlies" to be insulting and degrading.

    14. Re:OMG Ponies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect discription of Fiona in Burn Notice.

      Of course, she is so butch and lacking in any feminine sex appeal that they might have well cast a dude

  9. The Reason Why Journalists Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Journaists get a lot of flack, but at least they know how to construct a story. /. contributors on the other hand...

    Take the summary - not so much a summary as a prattling mess, that doesn't define its subject and so leaves the reader with no idea what on earth the text means.

  10. Rails Girls: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Return of the Prrrl Riot

  11. L2Date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a front for guys to meet girls.

  12. Slashdot just jumped the shark by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was fun while it lasted.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it did that long long ago my friend.

    2. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhhh you spoil his snark...

    3. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term "jumped the shark" jumped the shark a long time ago.

    4. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      Would you say he's jumped the snark?

    5. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was fun while it lasted.

      It jumped the shark when they sold out to Dice. Now it's just another stagnating cesspool of hipsters who think owning an iPhone and have installed linux on their old dilapidated computer (and, quickly finding they couldn't do anything with it without RTFM, gave up, much like their collection of unread 'classic' books) makes them geeks. You can tell because when someone posts a well-written but politically unpopular comment, they're modded down, while one liners supporting the party line get +5s, though they're about as intellectually stimulating as a twinky is at being healthy.

      Nothing says "mainstream culture" like group think and people patting themselves on the back for regurgitating what the other 'popular people' say. Geeks, real ones I mean, have a wide diversity of opinion and frequently debate endlessly for hours over pointless minutae like whether Han shot first or not or rage over calling the 'higgs' the 'god particle'. In fact, you can usually tell you're in the company of fellow geeks because they're having a grand old time being disagreeable with each other, and in fact make a game out of it! Nothing charms a geek quite as much as vehemently disagreeing about which Star Trek captain was the best... and whipping out slide rules and technical manuals to have a proper go of it. Don't get me wrong though -- it's all faux outrage, with about as much real emotion as telling someone their favorite bands sucks. Yeah, okay, and?

      That's the difference. And that's what Slashdot has lost. There's no diversity of opinion anymore... which is another way of saying... there's not very many geeks left on the site... just pretenders...

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    6. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The amount of bullshit that gets posted here every day and THIS is the post that set you off? Fuck, you were around for Jon Katz, you should have been long fucking gone. No offense but if you're still using something that you think is shit, even though you know it's shit, it's perfectly obvious it's shit, but you're still coming here anyway... Maybe Slashdot isn't the problem. Maybe the problem is looking you in the mirror every morning and you're just doing the same finger-pointing everyone else does...when they don't want to change.

      Seriously, it kills me laughing at you old-timers and low-ID users complaining day after day, after month and year, about how things on Slashdot are going down the toilet. As if it's actually going to get through to the editors, that timothy is going to sit down and read your one line critique and go, "you know what, he's right. All these paid articles and retarded bit pieces need to go." timothy will never say that. Ever. timothy gets PAID for posting retarded bullshit on the front page, he gets paid for the people coming here to complain about it. No matter how much you whinge, if it doesn't affect his paycheck at the end of the day, he doesn't give a fraction of a fuck about your opinion.

      The post is bullshit. It's a childish, stupid article, even Malda himself probably would have passed it over, good point. Great point. I agree with you 100%. Now are you going to do something about it, or are you just going to bitch and moan about how things just aren't like the "good old days?" As a wise man once said, "one of these lives as a future, the other does not."

    7. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Trilkin · · Score: 2
      My favorite part about this post was how you derisively call people hipsters then immediately drop this gem:

      ...and have installed linux on their old dilapidated computer (and, quickly finding they couldn't do anything with it without RTFM, gave up...

      That's some crazy cognitive dissonance there. Yeah, how dare people try to use/learn something different in a safe environment rather than subject their main box to the possibility of data loss over something they may well not find any practical use for. How dare they give up when they find almost every resource available on the internet is about as 'friendly' as you are! That attitude is EXACTLY why Linux on the Desktop will never truly go anywhere meaningful as people will perceive all Linux users as unnecessarily hostile dorks who are more interested in perpetuating their circlejerk than actually helping people learn. This comment in general is worse yet, because you're actually giving people shit for trying to teach THEMSELVES something. Then, when they run into a manpage that may as well be written in another language, they ask for help and they get a snide response. You are what's wrong with Slashdot. The fact you actually care about your fucking nerd-point count (karma) is telling enough as to what you're really here for.

      --
      Nobody cares what the CAPTCHA for your post was.
    8. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, as much as you want to reinvent the nerd concept: He is right and you are wrong. Oh and, I know because I see he is the nerd and you the pretender fucking hipster: he doesn't give a shit about linux winning in the desktop over your bitchy MacOS as much as you do or seem to think he does. He just owned Linux because he wanted, he didn't ask for permission and didn't cry in forums about how tough is Linux and because of being tough things will go wrong for it. He manned up, and you are what is wrong with this site, and with Linux, you stinky POS.

    9. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      I agree with this posting 100%

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    10. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over?

    11. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If your premise was true, then the 'real geeks' (RG) mostly likely went somewhere else, since RG are not likely to just drop off the face of the e-Earth. Your theory would thus carry more weight if you identified this alternative(s) destinations for RG.

      I suppose the alternative is that /. has grown larger than the total RG population, and now are too much a minority to affect mods "properly".

    12. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by theskipper · · Score: 1

      I think you may have missed the point. From my reading, her/his point was that these "hipsters" really aren't geeks per se. Especially in the world of hardware and computing.

      By definition a geek is someone who has a strong curiosity in most things that would be considered technical to the layman, primarily what's going on under the hood and creating stuff around it. When you encounter a new black box you spend the time and actually enjoy learning it inside out. It's that drive to know as much as possible that leads to friendly arguments with other people like yourself, and that feedback ultimately serves as a way to figure out and explore what you didn't know (which is a positive!). That's the way it worked in the old days anyway.

      To your (rather loud) point, installing Ubuntu then giving up after you realize that the command line is necessary is actually a pretty good test of the "hipster" mentality. Having a Macbook, github account and endless copypasta from stackexchange does not qualify one as a rails guru, or IOS programmer or anything else either. Just someone who is interested in image over substance. Jmho.

    13. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      I think you may have missed the point. From my reading, her/his point was that these "hipsters" really aren't geeks per se. Especially in the world of hardware and computing.

      Yeah, well... trying to get some people to the whooshing noise was the point is a lost cause.

      To your (rather loud) point, installing Ubuntu then giving up after you realize that the command line is necessary is actually a pretty good test of the "hipster" mentality. Having a Macbook, github account and endless copypasta from stackexchange does not qualify one as a rails guru, or IOS programmer or anything else either. Just someone who is interested in image over substance. Jmho.

      Bingo. Gold star for this guy. Unlike the previous poster, who was last seen riding the short bus. -_-

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    14. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I don't like how these post suggest the inviability of desktop Linux D:

      Look guys, the days when Linux was hard to install and use where a decade ago, I've been running Linux as my desktop for nearly 11 years. Never had a problem with it (well, not more than I've had with Windows, nothing is perfect). It usually runs in my best hardware, only about 4 years ago in my last hardware upgrade did I started to dual boot often, for games.

      And I've never been treated badly in a LInux forum (well except when ubuntu went crazy). The Year of Desktop Linux was in 2003.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    15. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there was some clever piece of software that would, say, simulate an entire computer, on which one could install any operating system with no possible harm to the operating system on which the simulation would be running.

    16. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [mimes holding up a handbag]

      oooooOOOOH!

    17. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      There's no diversity of opinion anymore.

      I disagree!

      No, I'm ont actually trying to make a joke, I do disagree. Yes, unpopular comments do sometimes unfairly get downmodded, but there is often plenty of debate and disagreement on this site. It's the thing that makes it worthwhile.

      Clearly you must to some extent agree because you are still here.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    18. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      The only real groupthink I've managed to spot is people complaining about groupthink.

      Aside from that the prime reason Slashdot is still good is that it has a diverse audience. There are some identifiable subgroups, but most of them coming at a subject from a different perspective makes for some interesting reading, aside from two or three contentious subjects that devolve into shouting matches between two subgroups.

      And as for complaining about Slashdot jumping the shark? In the 15 years I've been here, that's been a common complaint. I'm about to mod it -1, Redundant on sight.

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    19. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the posts don't even use punctuation, and the grammar is ridiculous. Its one thing if the reply its written poorly, but the summery? Come on. Most people on this site get nasty if they don't agree with something and have to interject some stupid political point in every God damn reply. That in itself makes it hipster, they love to do that. I only come here once in a while now, and mostly when I'm bored. Even stack overflow, has jumped the shark of nastiness. And they love to use the word "misogynistic".

    20. Re:Slashdot just jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm one of those people that has installed Linux and found that I couldn't do anything with it. I did give up on it. Does that make me a hipster? I had to give up on Linux on most of my computers because it crashed all the time because of the hardware. I didn't like spending two days after every update searching through tons of forum posts trying to figure out why my graphics were not working every single time I updated something. I didn't like having to physically unplug my hard drives so that Linux would install itself on one hard drive instead of installing the OS on one drive and the boot loader on a different drive (this was caused by a malfunctioning hard drive controller that windows could handle but Linux couldn't). I just honestly didn't have the time to spend fixing the OS after every update or time to spend several days just trying to get the graphics to work or one program to work. Does that make me a hipster?

      See that is part of the problem with calling people hipsters or fake geeks. Where does it stop? I could say that I know ASP.NET but someone would still call me a fake geek/hipster/etc. because I don't know C++, Java, etc. Even though I'm a developer that knows several languages guys will still quiz me until they find the one language/fact/etc that I don't know so that they can call me a fake geek girl. I think it's a problem in this field. The way I look at it is that there are people that can program and those that can't. I don't degrade those that think they can program because they know HTML by calling them hipsters/fake/etc because to be honest we all started out that way. Once we learned our first language we thought we were awesome programmers until we looked at someone else's code or tried to learn another language. We should be encouraging the people that at least installed linux and not degrading them by calling them hipsters/fake or treating them that way.

  13. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had more people getting me out of programming than into programming. It was C.

  14. Re:Naked? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember boys, no Dongles allowed at Rails Girls, and certainly no forking. Stick with Django if you're interested in forking dongles.

  15. Seems a bit sexist to me. by DumbMarketingGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can you imagine if I set up a 'Rails Whites' group or a 'Rails African Americans' group? This is no different.

    1. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      And you'd be helping whites or blacks, if one or both of those groups are under-represented in tech.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    2. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you'd be helping whites or blacks, if one or both of those groups are under-represented in tech.

      Funny, that. Around 40% of the people I've worked with over the past decade have been women. I've worked with one black guy.

    3. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've met far more black people (men actually, no women at all) in tech than hispanics, and most of my career was in Arizona which is chock full of them. And of course plenty of women too, though to be fair many of these women were Asian or Indian.

    4. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by magic+maverick+ · · Score: 0

      Hey look ma! An genuine stupid!

      Hey DumbMarketingGuy, does your buttz get hurtz when all the ladies actually know more about tech then you? Do you still have trouble forming relationships with women (other than your mom...)? What about comics? Are ladies allowed to read and enjoy comics? Are they allowed to play games? Do you get all upset when you get your ass handed to you by a some savvy women in any of the games you play? Who let all these womenz on the Internet anyone amirite?

      I bet you're a white heterosexual (though it's still all academic isn't it...) male. You're playing on easy. And even so you're a failure (being a marketer is a failure automatically, but you're a failure for a myriad of other reasons as well).

      In case it wasn't obvious, not it isn't sexist.

      --
      HELP MY ACCOUNT HAS BEEN HACKED BY AN ILLIBERAL ART STUDENT SET TO DESTROY THE INTERWEBZ!
    5. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the hell is this not modded as troll?

    6. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its THAN ffs..THAN not THEN...ffs get it right.

      As for the rest of your post...stfu idiot

    7. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any advantage to fixing the "problem" that some groups of people have a smaller number in tech?

      I can't see any advantage at all.

      The goal should be "get as many people, who possess the drive and aptitude, into respectible tech degree programs as possible".

      That is what will drive the industry forward, not filling positions based on sex organ.

    8. Re:Seems a bit sexist to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 10 years in the field + 6 for a BS/MS program, I have met about 60-70 women in the field.

      75% are complete crap.

      23% are mediocre to decent

      2% are outstanding

      That is roughly the same fallout of men in CS.

  16. Fangirling Al Gore, then Ruby on Rails? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2

    Not exactly moving from strength to strength, there.... Unless "nicheiest fandom possible" is considered a strength.

  17. Re:Sexist by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Funny

    Teaching women/girls to use Ruby on Rails isn't so much sexist as downright misogynist and abusive...

  18. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rails is shit anyways.

    grammar sucks too

  19. Re:Sexist by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    It's so easy even a girl can do it!

    I know for a fact that some girls can even do it right, by deleting Ruby in it's entirety.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  20. Re:Naked? by cod3r_ · · Score: 2

    something tells me is just going to be a bunch of dudes... Ironic that the rails girls video included a bunch of dudes.. My guess is they can't actually get any participation from women because women are not into ruby on rails.

  21. Re:Naked? by AtomicDevice · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought:
    "I bet the first comment on this article is going to be obnoxious and misogynist"

    I was right!

    --
    Ze Atomic Device! It iz Ztolen!
  22. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What lost me was when I clicked on the link and the page was covered in pencil doodles of kitties and ponies and crap. If you are trying to make it with a fricking band at least TRY to look somewhat professional, that thing looks like it was made by a 16 year old Twitard to declare whether they are with team shirtless or team shovelface...ugh.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  23. Equality via Exclusivity? by quietwalker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can understand the desire by many to attract more women into the CS/software dev field. I'm just not sure if the right way to do it is to emphasize one-gender-only programs. It seems to erode the basis of one of the more public goals; that women in the CS field be treated as equals with males in the CS field(*), while admittedly fulfilling other goals.

    We already know how 'separate but equal' turns out.

    I note above there's already a misogynistic note - even though it's just a joke - that some people are only interested if they're naked, so maybe there's a point anyway, at least in the short term.

    1. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

      I can understand the desire by many to attract more women into the CS/software dev field. I'm just not sure if the right way to do it is to emphasize one-gender-only programs. It seems to erode the basis of one of the more public goals; that women in the CS field be treated as equals with males in the CS field(*), while admittedly fulfilling other goals.

      We already know how 'separate but equal' turns out.

      I note above there's already a misogynistic note - even though it's just a joke - that some people are only interested if they're naked, so maybe there's a point anyway, at least in the short term.

      As a point of special interest, it is worthwhile. Women generally have different wants/needs when it comes to events like these, not to mention the obvious benefit of giving attendees the comfort of knowing they won't be going to *another* fucking sausage fest tech conference. And they merely cater to women; men are perfectly welcome (for some definitions of welcome) to attend as well.

    2. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by loufoque · · Score: 0

      Of course they have different needs, didn't you see they highlighted the presence of cooking equipment?

    3. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      I've never found someone that uses the term "sausage fest" and doesn't harbor misandristic feelings and a veiled superiority/inferiority complex.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    4. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just not sure if the right way to do it is to emphasize one-gender-only programs.

      I'm dubious about such things, too, but this group does it better than most. They let men come along to their programs, too, provided they're coming with at least one woman. This avoids the 'separate but equal' thing, and also - I suspect - increases female attendance, because people are more likely to come to such things if they can bring a friend, and it's easier to find a man among your friends who's into programming than another woman meeting the same criterion.

      It's still sexist, and I'd feel better about it if they had a formal ending clause ("We will adopt a completely gender-neutral policy when equality is achieved by measure X."), but it's less objectionable than many similar programs.

    5. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

      Basically, the problem is that despite all of the progress that's been made in allowing us to look at gender in a sane and reasonable way there is still a small but significant minority of 'that guy'.

      I don't even think it's the dongle jokes as much as it is the false sense of superiority that some men have, including men who are old enough and experienced enough and educated enough that they ought to know how much they don't know and that there are other people out there, many of them women, who know more than they about most subjects that are outside of their specialty.

      Here's a collection of stories: http://mansplained.tumblr.com/, some of these are pretty jarring.

    6. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most jarring thing about that site is how it frames everything as "men vs women" when most of those stories are "dumb and stubborn vs not dumb". There's an implicit assumption of "... and if I was a white middle-class male in my twenties it would be all different!" in many of those, and it's rather questionable. Men have to deal with stupid condescending stubborness as described in most of those "mansplaining" stories just as much as authors of those stories do.

    7. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by hazah · · Score: 1

      Try Germany.

    8. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noone else appears to be seeing this so I will.

      This is not about 'exclusivity'. Its about having a safe space.

      'Safe' can mean a lot of different things, depending on the individual, but at the very least it means being able to converse in a professional environment without being hit on every 30 seconds.

      Most of you probably think you're not part of the problem - after all, what does it matter if you express a personal interest in someone? When 90% of the guys at any given conference think the same thing, and all act on it, it quickly becomes tiring even to the most hardened. This isn't even getting into people feeling threatened, undervalued, objectified, or anything else. Just the sheer exhaustion of having to deal with 'nice guys' is enough to make these things worthwhile.

      Eventually when the men in society start to grow up a little, this won't be necessary - for now, it is.

    9. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just 'mistandrist'. Not 'misandristic'. Misandrist, like misogynist, means 'one who hates [pertinent attribute]'. Adding the list 'ic' would mean 'one who is like on who hates [pertinent attribute]'.

      Thanks for playing, come again.

    10. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can understand it, please enumerate why it is important.

      Last I checked women dominated mathematics, and were close to 50/50 in other mathematical fields such as chemistry, economics, and biology.

      Since women are interested and demonstably good at math, perhaps women simply aren't interested in CS and Engineering disciplines?

      If a woman has little interest and next to no aptitude for CS, I would prefer she stay far away.

      Qualifications, aptitude and interest are the obly thing that matters. Focusing on gender is a losing proposition.

    11. Re:Equality via Exclusivity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, does it suck to be a man-hating, sand-filled, weeping vagina?

      Because it seems like it does,

      The sheer exhaustion of having to deal with self-important bitches like you makes it more than worthwhile to keep women out of the workplace.

  24. Had to read all that crap by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    to get to the bottom line: "help more women and girls get into programming"

  25. Django Girls by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

    Django Girls can do it with only two fingers.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:Django Girls by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      No funny mods? It was a guitarist joke.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Django_Reinhardt

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  26. Too Expensive. by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

    "You just need to be excited!"

    That's going to be a problem.

  27. Re:Naked? by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

    Maybe (except for these girls) the female programmers know better than to waste their time with RoR, and instead concentrate on serious languages and platforms like C, C++, Java, Javascript, and even Python and PHP.

  28. Re:Naked? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 0

    RoR is indeed shit, but SAAS was ok.

    I got around that problem by using SAAS in Django. The best of both worlds.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  29. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Python and PHP are the same shit as Ruby, different syntax.

    Real Wymyn write Apache modules in C.

  30. This is ugly by Arker · · Score: 0

    We all know how it would work out if someone did something similar to this for men instead.

    As you say, separate but equal isnt the way to go here.

    I dont agree with this groupthink that somehow women choosing to go into other fields is somehow a horrible phenomenon that "WE" somehow are obligated to remedy. That's bullshit. Most women dont want to be programmers. The ones that do, are not in any way prohibited or locked out of all the same resources the guys use.

    So what's the message this group and others like it are putting out? Are they trying to tell us that women arent good enough? They have to have all this special gender-specific help or they will fail? They just arent smart enough? Is that really what they are trying to say?

    Cause I think that's bullshit too. Plenty of women I know with plenty of brains. Most of them dont go into programming for perfectly rational reasons - there is something else that interests them more.

    If something else interests you more, you should go do that instead. Man or woman, doesnt matter.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    1. Re:This is ugly by narcc · · Score: 1

      Ugh... You really just don't get it.

    2. Re:This is ugly by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Ugh... You really just don't get it.

      Excellent rebuttal. You really made your point there, didn't you. Very well supported.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    3. Re:This is ugly by Requiem18th · · Score: 0

      Well, explain, "you don't get it" is not an argument. But the phrase "you just don't get it" is feminist code for THE PATRIARCHY!!! So I can guess what you mean by that.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    4. Re:This is ugly by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Most women dont want to be programmers.

      Neither do most men. So, we can safely discount that point.

      The thing is that so many people seem to forget (apparently you included) is that women are humans and as such behave like humans. Humans are on the whole social animals and there is generally a really bad feeling associated with being the odd one out.

      So in a massively male dominated field, even without sexism or bad behaviour there is a strong disincentive to join simply because being the odd one out is unpleasant. I doubt this is usually a concious decision.

      But I'm not going to discount sexism.

      Have you ever been to a computer science confrerence, especially a not especially prestigious one? I have many times and the behaviour on display from my fellow men made me embarrassed to be a guy, to be honest.

      I'm talking about the one woman being trailed around by a bunch of forever alone types who don't say anything but just follow in a really creepy way, including waiting outside the toilets.

      So with your all high and mighty we are all equal we shouldn't care if women want to do something different blah blah attitude is frankly bullshit. The situation as is very actively puts of women who DO want to.

      That is not good and that IS best remedied.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    5. Re:This is ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bunch of chicks want to get together and do some coding. Why is this a problem?

    6. Re:This is ugly by Arker · · Score: 1

      "The thing is that so many people seem to forget (apparently you included) is that women are humans and as such behave like humans. Humans are on the whole social animals and there is generally a really bad feeling associated with being the odd one out."

      Cry me a bloody river. Please. To a degree this is true and it's always been true, in every profession or other group, and so what? It's just pathetic that you have such an expectation of pampering, for life to have no adversity in it.

      "Have you ever been to a computer science confrerence, especially a not especially prestigious one? I have many times and the behaviour on display from my fellow men made me embarrassed to be a guy, to be honest."

      Not just at computer science conferences, but many places that is true. You can do some good in those situations as an individual, but I dont see them as justifying let alone necessitating sexist behaviour in retaliation.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    7. Re:This is ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem, other than being extremely sexist and exclusionary.

      Oh, and it is completely not worthy of being considered news.

  31. Rails Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I went to the first one in Wellington (New Zealand) this last weekend, and had an awesome time. Highly recommended to other ladies! If nothing else, it showed a number of people that ladies can have an effect on how things are built (and what), and that dev was doable, could be fun and interesting, and might even be a career path. A very positive outcome.

    And people - if you're going to say [coding language x] is shit, you should say _why_ :)

    1. Re:Rails Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c girls, groovy girls, perl girls, java girls, python girls, rust girls, bash girls, awk girls, go girls

    2. Re:Rails Girl by jemmyw · · Score: 1

      I went to the first one in Wellington (New Zealand) this last weekend, and had an awesome time.

      I'm also in Wellington :)

      And people - if you're going to say [coding language x] is shit, you should say _why_ :)

      _why was the best part of Ruby.

      I'm primarily a RoR developer for quite a large company. Ruby and Rails have plenty of problems, but I think they only attract so much vitriol on this site because they were overhyped for a period of time, and because some will pour hate into anything they disagree with or dislike. The most common technical things that are said against it are that the language runtime is slow (which was true, it is quite a bit better now), that it doesn't scale (which was true, it is quite a bit better now and there any many solutions depending on the particular problem).

      My main gripe with it is that web apps written using Rails don't scale very well from an architectural/maintainable point of view. But my belief is that is because of the encouragement to work within the framework and take a "pragmatic" approach makes developers unwilling (and sometimes unable) to design a better program. It isn't an inherent problem with the language.

  32. Re:Naked? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    Python and PHP are the same shit as Ruby, different syntax.

    We're actually not talking about Ruby proper here, but Ruby on Rails.

    Anyway, Python and PHP both have far more support and popularity than Ruby. Getting a web host account that has PHP support is trivial (in fact, it'd be a real feat to get an account that doesn't support PHP these days), and Python is almost as trivial. Ruby, however, isn't that common.

  33. When I hear that accent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...all I hear is "ear ear ear ear ear". Stop pronouncing the "r" so much at the ends of words!

  34. Anti-Rails Rant -- No Holy (G)rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rails sucks except for mass-production crank-em-out-cheap "web sweat shops" with a carefully-selected staff.

    It's too different from "regular" programming for places with fungible and/or multi-hat staff such that the learning curve is too large. It's the right tool for the right place, but that RIGHT place is not everywhere.

    Use the right tool for the job and know your staffing patterns. There is NO one-magic-size-fits-all. It does quite well where it fits well, but the trade-off is that it sucks badly outside of its comfort zone.

  35. Re:Naked? by crutchy · · Score: 0

    i've never used it, but the name sounds shit enough

    but then again a lot of things that are even remotely connected with linux have some weird names

  36. Re:Naked? by crutchy · · Score: 0

    it shows that women are attracted to shiny things rather than cool things

    now now don't be so sexist... women loved brushed stainless steel fridges, which are cool in more ways than one :)

  37. Re:Naked? by crutchy · · Score: 0

    real women cook steak for men who program by cutting down trees, chewing them up into pulp to make their own paper and punching holes for other real women to validate and run as programs

  38. Re:Naked? by crutchy · · Score: 0

    Python

    any language where indentation is part of the syntax is gay

  39. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by bdwebb · · Score: 1

    HEY! You need to calm down with that! They are professional in an indie-hip-I'm_way_cooler_than_you-progressive-warmfuzzy way that you just wouldn't understand!

    Seriously, though...I'm completely with you. As a nerd I can appreciate a progressive work environment that is more comfortable and less corporate chic/stuffy but we are going way too far these days. Kittens and ponies...you might as well tell girls that are seriously interested in web development "Get into rails development so you can make shitty pages like we all used to when we were 15!" If you're supposed to appeal to women and show them that they can do it too, at least try to make it somewhat professional so it will appeal to adults instead of children. It doesn't need to be corporate, just not ponies and kittens...holy hell.

  40. Re:Naked? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Hey, I didn't say it was a big favorite of mine, just that it's widely used and accepted.

  41. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Most of the PHP MVC frameworks are direct rip-offs of Rails, but whatever ... enjoy your shared hosting accounts.

  42. Re:Naked? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with a shared hosting account for a low-traffic site?

  43. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly is better about Django? Django's template library and ORM are objectively terrible and Django is even slower than Rails. It's unfortunate because Jinja 2 and SqlAlchemy are significantly better than anything available in Ruby.

  44. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by styrotech · · Score: 1

    What lost me was when I clicked on the link and the page was covered in pencil doodles of kitties and ponies and crap.

    Ponies? Now I'm confused - is this about Rails or Django?

  45. Rails Girls by oraclese · · Score: 1

    What an unfortunate nickname...

  46. Re:Naked? by styrotech · · Score: 1

    What exactly is better about Django? Django's template library and ORM are objectively terrible and Django is even slower than Rails. It's unfortunate because Jinja 2 and SqlAlchemy are significantly better than anything available in Ruby.

    Why is it unfortunate? Are you stuck with Django?

    There are plenty of other frameworks that let you use jinja2 and SQLA together if that's what you want.

  47. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's grammatically correct. Ruby on Rails is what Rails is an abbreviation of, and as such "is" is the correct verb for the sentence.

    Pro tip: Just because it ends in s, does not mean that it's plural.

  48. Re:Naked? by Velex · · Score: 0

    Came here for this comment. Very satisfied. Thank you.

    Not going to leave satisfied quite yet until I choose to open my yap.

    So, what has the Ada Initiative accomplished with their sexism and presumption that all men are rapists?

    1. We now have a new joke every time there's an article about women in IT.
    2. ???

    How many more girls are going to pick up, well, in this case, Ruby on Rails and go "hey, that's neat!" and learn programming because the Ada Initiative handed out creeper cards, censored panels, and cost individuals their jobs?

    0

    The really sad part to all this the more I think about it is how it even had my misogyny going for a while. I was raised as a male during the 90s. Reverse discrimination across the board. I know what it's like to be unfairly treated in very overt ways simply because of a body part I never even wanted. Hell, that body part was even mutilated at birth and never properly healed, leaving me with the exquisite experience of knowing the kind of genital pain that's only supposed to be associated with FGM.

    The trouble is that one of these days I'm going to be a woman looking for a job (mostly because undergoing gender transition in a nearly all conservative womyn-born-womyn environment just isn't going to work).

    Is this what I get to thank the Ada Initiative for? Thanks, Ada Initiative. I'm really looking forward to being perceived as somebody who's going to be a total bitch who's going to sue for sexual harassment at the first dongle joke. Thanks, Ada Initiative. Sure, the Ada Initiative may not consider me a woman because I'm not a "womyn-born-womyn," but people who gender me female perceive me no differently than any other woman. Mostly because unlike in Crocodile Dundee, folks don't actually go checking genitals in real life.

    Thanks, Ada Initiative. You sure did a favor for women.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  49. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low traffic sites don't need to be built with frameworks.

  50. Re:Naked? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    Django is better because I like it more than RoR. Probably because Python is pretty good and I use it enough to be fluent. I don't care about speed, it's fast enough for my purposes. I've written high performance web stuff and it didn't involve 'frameworks' or SQL databases.

    But Django's support for style inheritance is notable by its complete absence. Hence my comment.

     

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  51. Re:Naked? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    So what is the web framework du jour? I'm not going to try them all.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  52. Re:Sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This has to be the most sexist technology thing I've ever seen. Seriously, Ruby on Rails for girls?

    Well, girls do love precious stones, so I guess it makes a certain amount of sense... :-P

  53. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just think it's funny that you call Rails shit when you prefer a big bloated Python framework that is worse in almost every conceivable way.

  54. Re:Naked? by narcc · · Score: 1

    Yet RoR is a notoriously poor choice for high-traffic sites.

    I think Grishnakh is on to something here...

  55. Re:Naked? by narcc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Misogyny is all the rage in tech, gaming, and rationalist communities. I have no idea why, but I wish they'd tone it down.

  56. Feeling left out by DavidHumus · · Score: 1

    NYC here, feeling slighted not to have been included on the US tour.

  57. sig comment, off topic... by slew · · Score: 1

    The full quote of the origin of your sig... It seems to have a different tone when you read the full context...

    Western civilization, it seems to me, stands by two great heritages. One is the scientific spirit of adventure – the adventure into the unknown, an unknown which must be recognized as being unknown in order to be explored; the demand that the unanswerable mysteries of the universe remain unanswered; the attitude that all is uncertain; to summarize it – the humility of the intellect. The other great heritage is Christian ethics – the basis of action on love, the brotherhood of all men, the value of the individual – the humility of the spirit.

    These two heritages are logically, thoroughly consistent. But logic is not all; one needs one's heart to follow an idea. If people are going back to religion, what are they going back to? Is the modern church a place to give comfort to a man who doubts Godmore, one who disbelieves in God? Is the modern church a place to give comfort and encouragement to the value of such doubts? So far, have we not drawn strength and comfort to maintain the one or the other of these consistent heritages in a way which attacks the values of the other? Is this unavoidable? How can we draw inspiration to support these two pillars of western civilization so that they may stand together in full vigor, mutually unafraid? Is this not the central problem of our time?

    1. Re:sig comment, off topic... by Skinny+Rav · · Score: 1

      Excelent offtop :)

      The snippet in the sig is sufficient, because Western civilisation forgot about this heritage. The EU documents do not even mention Christian ethics as the foundation of Europe. Which is kind of WTF, because e.g. "Give the emperor what belongs to the emperor, give God what belongs to God, and give me what is mine" is the foundation of religion-state separation. Did it always work properly? No, but we are talking about basics here, not practicalities.

      But I agree that the whole citation is much more, it is an atheist admitting that it is possible and beneficial to reconcile science and religion - very strong declaration, very strong.

    2. Re:sig comment, off topic... by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I am, of course, aware of the full quote. I have mixed feelings about how I had to butcher it to fit into a Slashdot sig.

      My point was that Feynman was not openly hostile to religion. He spoke about ethics frequently and he never claimed that the scientific method was appropriate for addressing ethical questions. I frequently see Feynman quoted on Slashdot to attack religion -- and based on what I have read and heard of Feynman, I don't think he would have done that. I cannot really tell whether Feynman was an atheist or an agnostic. There's a pretty big difference, in my opinion.

      My intent was invite people to look a bit more deeply into what Feynman had to say about religion. So it looks like that worked, for one person at least. If you have suggestions for a better quote that might make my point more clearly, I would love to hear them.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  58. Re:Sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shiat, it's considered torture for either sex. We need to get Geneva involved.

    Ruby was a great idea could have been its "improve performance later" motto. Hows that going, now nearly 20 years later? Idiots.

  59. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe after you become a woman you'll realise why we need organisations like the Ada Initiative.

    Do you have any sources for the transphobia you're citing?

  60. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    You are trying to sell your band to the world and get taken seriously as female musicians...so you make your site look like a 15 year old twitard chick's fanfic page? Really?

    I've played with many a female musician (no pun intended) and they would frankly be insulted by this shit, their site just screams "I'm a girly girl with titties but no brains, giggle giggle" that it really does a disservice to female musicians because all it does is reinforce that stereotype.

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  61. Re:Naked? by styrotech · · Score: 1

    So what is the web framework du jour? I'm not going to try them all.

    If popularity is very important to you then you'll probably want to stick with Django or Rails.

    Personally I'm partial to Pyramid (the merger of Pylons and BFG). It seems more 'engineered' than the very opinionated frameworks like Rails and Django or the steady stream of new 'simple' frameworks. It is completely agnostic when it comes to templating libraries or data persistence layers.

    That does mean that you need to make more choices and architectural decisions yourself, and there is a longer learning curve figuring out the best options etc. But that pays off later when your apps get more complex and you won't have to fight the against the framework.

    I suggest it as it's likely that someone who prefers SQLAlchemy over the simpler ORMs in Rails or Django though is likely to be someone who appreciates more powerful non opinionated frameworks.

  62. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Rails is shit anyways.

    grammar sucks too

    Despite what DC Comics might think, you do not pluralize a proper noun that is homonymous with a non-proper noun by changing its form in the same manner as the non-proper form of the noun.

    "Reign of the Supermen!" should have been "Reign of the Supermans".
    "Rails is shit" is both correct and true.

  63. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virtual servers are dirt cheap now, and what kind of slashdotter doesn't want root?

  64. Re:Naked? by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

    That was comment inheritance. The parent comment assign RoR - shit. My comment inherited that assignment and added the Django+Style Inhertance - I like property.

    Your comment overrode that assignment, but if you were using python you could assign a tuple django - {i like, bloated}

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  65. Re:Naked? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    They are? Where? And for less than $4/month please.

  66. Hurrah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally some girlz— naked and covered with hot grits— for the rails brogrammers to enjoy!

  67. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital Ocean for $5/month, if you can stretch your budget.

  68. Re:"Would you believe the reason..." by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

    And yet I think we aren't selling programming enough to teenagers.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  69. Re:Naked? by Mitchell314 · · Score: 1

    Definitely need to tone it down. With a nice cup of coffee. At 3am, and not in an elevator.

    --
    I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
  70. Everybody got it but me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rails Girls?

    Everybody got it but me.
    Peter, Paul, George and Harry.
    Everybody has a new car.
    Everybody got it but me.
    Everybody sleeps with Mary,
    Peter, Paul, George and Harry.
    But who would ever have suspected
    that that sweet young girl was infected?
    Now everybody got it but me.

    Rails Girls? The mind boggles.

  71. Re:Naked? by rhodium_mir · · Score: 1

    I've been pretty happy with my 256 MB VPS from FrontRangeHosting for $4/mo before a 50% off coupon code. They also have a 128 MB one for $2/mo. The 50% off coupon has expired, but there is a 25% off code that appears to still work: "FRH25".

    --
    You can't spell "oneiromancy" without "roman".
  72. Rails is junk by neonmonk · · Score: 1

    If women are so smart then why are they using rails?

  73. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Low-traffic sites are the equivalent of self-publishing. Which is to say pointless, and largely driven by vanity.

  74. Three Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Global Interpreter Lock. Ruby is just a toy and cannot even hope to scale the performance peaks that a well-honed Java solution can.

    1. Re:Three Words by lpq · · Score: 1

      You mean the java that is going proprietary and you won't get updates for unless you pay support to Oracle?

    2. Re:Three Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Ruby runs on the JVM and you don't have to make a class file and implement a interface or inherit Thread just to run a thread.

  75. Re:Naked? by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 1
    There is a free Amazon AWS tier. Look here. It's even called AWS Free Usage Tier.

    Yes, it's pretty slow; yes, there are limits. If you need more, then you need to pay a little more. Compared to the situation 5 years ago, costs are way, way down.

    --
    The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
  76. Re:Naked? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot. Countless small businesses have low-traffic sites, and don't need anything more, since they're small businesses. It's not vanity for the local pizza shop to have its own website that you can order a pizza on, and something like that has no need for a dedicated server when they might get a handful of hits per hour at best.

  77. Re:Sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed. Like they had problems reading the standard documentation or something.

  78. Re:Sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just realized that the quote at the bottom of the page was:

    "It might help if we ran the MBA's out of Washington." -- Admiral Grace Hopper

    It let me wondering if she would have joined such a club...

  79. language vs. framework Re:Rails Girl by Fubari · · Score: 1

    My main gripe with it is that web apps written using Rails don't scale very well from an architectural/maintainable point of view.

    Interesting (sincerely); I read this from time to time, but don't hear much about why people believe it (note: I'm RoR ignorant).
    Question: at what point(s) does RoR start to not scale very well?
    Long-tail reasoning would suggest the most web apps are pretty small and will never grow to operate at ebay or facebook scale; seems to be plenty of room for easy-to-build smaller apps that never need to scale.

    But my belief is that is because of the encouragement to work within the framework and take a "pragmatic" approach makes developers unwilling (and sometimes unable) to design a better program. It isn't an inherent problem with the language.

    (emphasis added)
    So... if the language (Ruby) is fine, and the framework (Rails) doesn't scale, is that actually a problem?
    My first thought is easily reaching the scale-point (where you need to start building from scratch, or maybe with a somehow stronger framework) to "grow to the next level" doesn't seem that bad.
    (Not that you were making a value judgement about scaling being a problem; I just read you as stating an observation; a useful thing to know.)

    1. Re: language vs. framework Re:Rails Girl by jemmyw · · Score: 1

      Rails isn't the barrier, it will work fine with a complex application. The scalability problem is where the program starts to require more than Rails 'MVC' pattern. But as I say, this is a problem only in the heads of the developers, they don't want to go outside of that pattern and the result is overloaded model classes.

  80. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a man had written TFA the response would've been at the same level. It's rather annoying to hear an exalted highschool "person" cheerleading a programming language in the way, as if it's some fashion accessory that needs to be demoed in the streets at full tilt.

    Methinks some people are just too willing to be offended.

  81. posts have totally missed the point by verayh · · Score: 1

    Comments in this thread are - just - plain - sad.

    For years, people in the IT world have bemoaned the fact that there aren't enough women in IT,
    YET, when a bunch of women do something about it, the only thing most of /. people who can
    be bothered to comment say are derogatory - either about the women or about the project overall.

    WHO gives a flying rat's rear end if there are sweet looking pictures on the front page? This simply
    attracts the younger generation. (Young girls are - like young boys - less intimidated by something
    that appears friendly and that they relate to.) I can imagine a lot of 11-15 yo finding this appealing.
    (Maybe some will be even younger, who knows?) They've also sprinkled their pages with funny
    cartoons to keep them reading!

    WHY in the nederworld does it matter if the programming paradigm isn't everyone's favourite?
    Getting young women into the field is the desired outcome. They'll figure out for themselves
    that there are other things in this area. They just need a way to get started. (And for those
    retractors, yes, there will be a number of women who don't want or need this type of support.)
    Like it or not, getting a foot into the door with whatever programming language that is *easy*
    (how many of you started with basic? HUH?) keeps the interest level up. As the person
    learns, they move onto more complex structures.

    Really, for those who've posted these - you ought to hang your heads in shame. I bet a lot of
    you didn't even look past the home page ...

  82. Re: Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have a bleeding vagina?

  83. Re:Naked? by TechNeilogy · · Score: 1

    Early in my career, the first Windows programmer I worked with was female. She pwned me in terms of skillset. It was a valuable lesson.

    --
    "The wisdom of the Patriarchs was that they *knew* they were fools." --Master Foo
  84. Sexist group by hobarrera · · Score: 1

    I've never understood why there's so much support to such a sexist group. I'm sure if I made a group "Python for men", or "Python for whites" I'd end up in jail (or maybe just really beaten up).
    But "Ruby for girls", which focuses on helping women (without any rational reason for it's sexism), is all so popular.

  85. Re:Naked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you stuck with rails?

    There are other frameworks and you can easily take out what you like from Rails and use it with whatever. The modularity of Ruby + Rack complaint apps and libs = win over Python