Slashdot Mirror


Federal Judge Says Interns Should Be Paid

An anonymous reader writes "Student interns are typically relegated to menial tasks like fetching coffee and taking out the trash, the idea being that they get paid in experience instead of money. On Tuesday, Manhattan Federal District Court Judge William H. Pauley disagreed, ruling in favor of two interns who sued Fox Searchlight Pictures to be paid for their work on the 2010 film Black Swan. The interns did chores that otherwise would have been performed by paid employees. Pauley ruled, in accordance with criteria laid out by the U.S. Department of Labor, that unpaid internships should be educational in nature and specifically structured to the benefit of the intern, and reasoned that if interns are going to do grunt work like regular employees, then they should be paid like regular employees." The article seems to imply that this might be the beginning of the end for the rampant abuse of unpaid internships: "Judge Pauley rejected the argument made by many companies to adopt a 'primary benefit test' to determine whether an intern should be paid, specifically whether 'the internship’s benefits to the intern outweigh the benefits to the engaging entity.' Judge Pauley wrote that such a test would be too subjective and unpredictable."

92 of 540 comments (clear)

  1. Genius judge by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you have to pay interns like regular employees, what's the point of hiring interns?

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    1. Re:Genius judge by intermodal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not the judge's job to defend the internship concept.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    2. Re:Genius judge by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you have to pay interns like regular employees, what's the point of hiring interns?

      Because some of them are good enough that you will want to employ them later but you can't really tell which ones from a conventional interview.

      Personally I think no-one should be employed for zero pay, interns are not slaves.

    3. Re:Genius judge by 54mc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The only point I can see is that even if they have to be paid, you still have perfectly legitimate reason to pay them less than you would someone else doing the same work.

      The real problem is the racket they've got going. You can't get a job without experience and the only experience you can get is going to be unpaid or underpaid labor doing the exact same job

      --
      Joy! Beautiful spark of the gods!
    4. Re:Genius judge by saihung · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The "point" of hiring interns is to provide them with an educational experience. That's why you don't have to pay them - because they show up primarily for their own benefit and provide few, if any, benefits to the host organization. People who show and do valuable work for you are called "employees," and the thing about employees is that they have a legal right to be paid. Once upon a time, businesses understood this and hired seasonal workers (students on summer vacation) for a small salary. Nowadays every imbecile thinks that an "intern" is a source of free labor. Wrong.

      If you want free labor and you're a for-profit business? Screw you. We have minimum wage laws for a reason. You are not allowed to make a profit off of someone's labor and not pay them. "Internship" is not a code word for "someone I can't be bothered to pay."

    5. Re:Genius judge by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are jobs that people really, really, really want to do for zero pay. Why wouldn't you allow them to make that decision for themselves?

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    6. Re:Genius judge by dywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's called volunteering and is not a "job".

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    7. Re:Genius judge by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, say goodbye to internships...

      While rulings like this are well meaning, they will hurt more than help in many cases.

      Much like minimum wage, making it higher...a living wage, hurts low end job markets. It isn't MEANT to be a living wage for supporting a family. These jobs are for kids, living at home still or maybe in college...

      We need these jobs that teach kids skills, and/or allow them to start to earn money, and find out what it entails for working a job, dependability and responsibility, and how to manage money.

      Kids still often get school credits for these internships, no?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    8. Re:Genius judge by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you have to pay interns like regular employees, what's the point of hiring interns?

      .. ? if you "hired" interns, you would pay them.
      using interns for just manual labor nothing to do with the subject they're studying is just.. well, it's sort of cheating them and not just sort of, it's downright fraud against the school institutions as well who count them as course credit - of course those institutions are to be blamed for the abuse of the system as well since if they require "internship" for graduation but have no qualifiers on the actual work then they're pretty much just participating in free manual labor work experience without pay program. it's stupid for everyone involved except for those who sell their services to someone and pocket the cash(half of worlds magazine adverts are photoshopped and laid out by free interns - but the company still bills the client for their time and that's just nasty).

      if they got nothing for the interns to internship in they shouldn't be taking them in. but free labor and intern bitches yayyyy so they take them even if they have no intention of teaching them anything or putting them into any work in the field their internship is supposed to be in.

      there's of course all sorts of other reasons for putting the hammer on it, because otherwise soon you'll mcd will no longer have any employees - just permanent interns who get paid 1/10th of the minimum wage as "expenses" for their work.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:Genius judge by sribe · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are jobs that people really, really, really want to do for zero pay. Why wouldn't you allow them to make that decision for themselves?

      Why don't we allow people to sell themselves into slavery? Because as a society we long ago decided that slavery was immoral. Why don't we allow people to contract themselves into a period of indentured servitude? Because as a society we long ago decided that indentured servitude was immoral. Why don't we allow people to work for profit-making corporations without being paid for their labor? Because as a society we long ago decided...

      Note that unpaid internships are legal in 2 broad circumstances: first, of course, working for a non-profit entity, second where the intern is being trained and not performing immediately useful work for the company.

    10. Re:Genius judge by pellik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are plenty of paid internships out there already. The paid internships are actually much more likely to get the student a real job after college, too. Also remember that the students are still paying tuition for the credit hours their internship earns them.

    11. Re:Genius judge by pellik · · Score: 2

      Students still pay tuition when they do internships. Volunteering is free, this is pay to work.

    12. Re:Genius judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We need these jobs that teach kids skills, and/or allow them to start to earn money, and find out what it entails for working a job, dependability and responsibility, and how to manage money.

      They can't very well learn to manage money when they aren't earning any.

    13. Re:Genius judge by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I did 9 months of paid internships to get my degree. Unpaid internships would not have counted.

      They are not coffee fetching jobs.

    14. Re:Genius judge by sribe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I hope you get modded up, as your comment gets to the core of the issue very nicely. I just wanted to expand on this:

      Nowadays every imbecile thinks that an "intern" is a source of free labor.

      Yeah, I run a very small software dev business, and on a couple of occasions I have hired interns for the summer. Of course, as I hope everybody here knows, in our industry interns get paid, and pretty well...

      A couple of times, in conversations with friends outside the industry, when this subject came up, there was a total disconnect. They wondered how the heck somebody like me could find interns, and it turned out that their bafflement was because they assumed that by "intern" I meant "unpaid". I was so shocked by this ridiculous assumption that the first time I was literally speechless for a few seconds while I processed the concept: "this person thinks that there are young people who will develop software for a for-profit entity without being paid, wtf...". Then I slowly explained: "no, in this industry employers consider it customary to pay our employees..."

    15. Re:Genius judge by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I never understood how companies got away with this kind of stuff in the USA. I'm from Canada, and I've never heard of an unpaid intership happening here. If it does, I don't know why anybody would go for it. In university, we had a Co-op programme which required us to alternate between semesters of school and work. Took a little longer to finish your degree (but only a little bit more, we were either working or in school year round, and work only started after second year). After we graduated, we had 16 months of paid work experience. They didn't pay us as much as regular employees, but it wasn't minimum wage work either. And the co-op coordinators at the school ensured we were doing real work and not just fetching coffee and making photo copies.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    16. Re:Genius judge by sed+quid+in+infernos · · Score: 2

      There are several comic books I'd write for in exchange for zero pay. I worked stage crew for several concerts in college for zero pay, entirely voluntarily. Both examples are for-profit enterprises.

    17. Re:Genius judge by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      In most societies it would have been illegal to have them working without pay. What to expect does not make that legal. The judge is correct.

    18. Re:Genius judge by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you read the article you would have found out that the "interns" were actually unpaid workers. From the article: "The judge noted that these internships did not foster an educational environment and that the studio received the benefits of the work." The judge correctly ruled that Fox Searchlight Pictures did not followed the criteria laid out by the U.S. Department of Labor. (You didn't even have to read the article - it's in the summary too). The criteria linked above is a good read btw.

      It's about damn time the government went after the abuse. It doesn't affect our interns since (1) they are paid a stipend and (2) it is actually educational and benefits them way more than us. We use interns to foster growth in research. The movie industry use interns for free labor.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    19. Re:Genius judge by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, say goodbye to internships...

      Try having a look at a country where this has long been established in law, and you'll find internships are flourishing.

      What we've said goodbye to is the exploitation of free labour to do menial tasks that offered no real benefit to the intern. There's a great scheme in Scotland where the enterprise development agency funds internships for students/recent graduates at new startups. There are strict conditions attached to the money, as the internship has to be directly related to a specific project, so that the intern is exposed to the full lifecycle and gets genuine experience to talk about at interview. This gives the businesses the opportunity to take a chance on something new or different, benefiting everyone. (Normally.) In fact, there's a great history of companies taking on their interns after, as these companies are at a stage of rapid expansion.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    20. Re:Genius judge by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I always assumed interns actually performed services in relation to what their field of study is. Fashion students do fashion work like costumes, makeup, jewelry making, etc. Journalism students check facts, review articles, report on local/low importance stories. Other students perform tasks actually related to their future job. And these tasks for all interns include some grunt work such as cleaning up the shop, checking supplies, pumping the bellows at the forge, whatever is needed.

      But I don't think anyone goes to college to be coffee-handler or floor-sweeper. If that is the extant of their internship experience, they should be paid like the other employees. Or better, they should report that to their professor/school, and that company should be excluded from the internship choices. When their free labor pool disappears, they will stop abusing the process.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    21. Re:Genius judge by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apprentices normally get paid. Go ask a local electrician. No one is saying pay these folks top dollar, just minimum wage or more.

    22. Re:Genius judge by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      To get your foot in the door, some "interns" may not even call it an internship to avoid getting paid and picking up the experience instead as volunteer work. The part I'm really missing is if everybody wanted a paid internship why would anybody accept an unpaid one?

    23. Re:Genius judge by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Volunteering at for profit businesses is generally speaking illegal. Calling it something else does not fool the law. I would imagine they have trouble finding paid internships and outside pressure like college credits requires them to do this work.

    24. Re:Genius judge by Drewdad · · Score: 2

      Personally I think no-one should be employed for zero pay, interns are not slaves.

      Goodbye parenthood.....

    25. Re:Genius judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Internships are meant to be educational, and for the benefit of the intern. People who take an internship are justified in expecting a program that is educational, and to their benefit. A program in which they perform work that a paid employee should be performing should quit once the nature of the job is made clear, but at that point, the employer has essentially committed fraud, violated the internship contract (implied or otherwise), and probably committed a significant amount of what an employer would call "time theft" if the tables were turned. Internships are not meant to be busy-work that gets you a back-slapping nudge-wink goodwill advantage purely by demonstrating that you're wiling to jump through hoops and suck down any shit employers might consider feeding you in the interest of their balance book. Employers who try to use them that way deserve punishment, just like any other criminal.

    26. Re:Genius judge by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      this doesnt stop unpaid internships.
      RTFA.
      this stops unpaid interns being used as free labor for activites that cannot be onsidered educational. two film school students being given an internship on a movie and being used as unpaid labor instead of being TAUGHT THINGS. that is the sort of thing being stopped. not unpaid internships as a whole, but those which are simply trying to get free labor and not fulfilling the educational requirement.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    27. Re:Genius judge by Sique · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes. It's called tax evasion. If a for-profit business gets something of value (like unpaid work), it has to pay taxes on it.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    28. Re:Genius judge by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but some of the no pay interns are doing basic office work / basic labor and not stuff in there fields.

    29. Re:Genius judge by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "There are plenty of paid internships out there already"

      That's a pretty broad statement that ignores a number of facts, such as:
      1) Not every field has paid internships
      2) Not every field has internships readily available
      3) Not every location has companies nearby willing to take on interns (think small cities and rural areas)
      4) Not every paid internship is flexible enough to be viable
      5) Not every internship meets the educational requirements some schools have for it to count

    30. Re:Genius judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      But what if their work is not realistically worth even the minimum wage to the employer? What if they can get a more experienced person for the minimum wage instead of a dumb kid who never did any work in their life?

      From the summary: "The interns did chores that otherwise would have been performed by paid employees.". So clearly, it was jobs that needed doing. And if they 'cant get a more experienced person for the minimum wage' then the job cleary doesnt offer ENOUGH PAY. If you want experienced people, be prepared to pay them as experienced people.

      If it is work that you would otherwise have to pay someone to do, then the intern deserves to be paid as well. Again, from the summary "unpaid internships should be educational in nature and specifically structured to the benefit of the intern" so sure, you can have unpaid internships, but then the intern should get something out of it as well.

      Also: Captcha "exploit", heh :)

    31. Re:Genius judge by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The kid can go work at a gas station, or burger king or whatever.

      Your situation is bullshit and clearly there is a huge middle ground between your ideology and greece.

    32. Re:Genius judge by Obfuscant · · Score: 3

      In most societies it would have been illegal to have them working without pay.

      That may be true. But in a free society, they would have been paid exactly what they contracted for before they started the internship. The rights of the two parties to the contract would have had some significance, and a court would not come in later and overturn an agreement between two free people who voluntarily entered an agreement for legal activities.

      What to expect does not make that legal. The judge is correct.

      Of course what to expect makes it legal. If I agree to work for you for free, and thus I expect no payment, that should be perfectly legal. I voluntarily agreed to do that. You agreed to the same. How is that illegal? Why should any sane person think it was illegal?

      What this court has ruled is that I can go to a business and offer to work for free for a chance to show them I can do what they need done and maybe they'll hire me, or to learn something from them by doing. They can say "ok" or they can say "no". Suppose they say "yes, here, do this..." Then, after I've done work for them I can sue for back pay because they should have paid me. That's nuts. That's absolutely ridiculous. If you care to notice, that "work for free as an introduction to me" is something that is, or at least has been, suggested to people here who want to break into the software design field but who don't have formal schooling or a current resume. Collectively, we have told people to do exactly this 'free intern' thing.

      If that company cannot have me do anything that they would normally pay someone to do then there is no advantage to them in having me there. In fact, I'm a liability since a paid employee would need to supervise me. Or any unpaid intern, for that matter. Any productive activity I perform they would have had to pay someone to do, thus I can do nothing productive. If I can do nothing productive, the value of the experience is worthless to me, too. Given the new "sue for back pay" option, no sane company would say "ok" anymore. Not only are they opening themselves up for an unexpected liability, they've lost the right to negotiate the pay for the work and a judge will decide for them.

      Now, had there been coercion or force, or a breach of contract, then yes, courts should become involved. And, of course, you can't legally volunteer to do something illegal for someone else, but then, in this case we know the actions weren't illegal because the claim was they would have been legally performed by paid employees. I.e., if it is legal to pay someone to do work for you, it should be just as legal to let an unpaid volunteer or intern do it. (I note that many unions have negotiated contracts that prohibit volunteers doing their work, but that's a contractual issue and not a legal one.)

      This case could have repercussions not only for all unpaid internships, but for all volunteer work. Every place I volunteer I've agreed to do work for no pay. I am doing things, in every case, that they'd have to pay someone to do if a volunteer didn't do it. I could make a fortune, now, by suing companies (and various branches of the government) for back pay. That, alone, should show how nuts this judge is.

    33. Re:Genius judge by PraiseBob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You are absolutely correct. Here's an excerpt from a slave owners diary in 1861:

      When Dick married Hetty, the Anderson house was next door. The two families agreed to sell either Dick or Hetty, whichever consented to be sold. Hetty refused outright, and the Andersons sold Dick that he might be with his wife. This was magnanimous on the Andersons' part, for Hetty was only a lady's-maid and Dick was a trained butler, on whom Mrs. Anderson had spent no end of pains in his dining-room education, and, of course, if they had refused to sell Dick, Hetty would have had to go to them. Mrs. Anderson was very much disgusted with Dick's ingratitude when she found he was willing to leave them. As a butler he is a treasure; he is overwhelmed with dignity, but that does not interfere with his work at all.

      Clearly the slave owning society feel they are being overly generous by giving an education to their property. They even gave him a choice of where to work for free! Your vision of society fits perfectly in line with the Antebellum south. (To be clear, I'm not calling you a racist, you're just pro-slavery which is actually frowned upon in most societies in the 21st century)

    34. Re:Genius judge by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I went back and re-read sribe's post. I short-changed it a bit with a knee-jerk reaction. I thought he was simply equating internships with slavery. I didn't read it very well. Sorry sribe, I mischaracterized what you were saying.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    35. Re:Genius judge by pnutjam · · Score: 2

      Those who forget history...

    36. Re:Genius judge by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      So...

      since you can't figure it out yourself: the difference between an intern and a slave is the ability to say no.

      My point is opportunity sometimes outweighs the downside of not getting paid.

      In the entrepreneurship, this concept is so basic I feel a little ridiculous explaining it to you.

      And you know what else is frowned upon in society? People who read slave owner's diarys', HMMM.

    37. Re:Genius judge by robthebloke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah sorry, but no. I've run internship programs in the past, and fundamentally they all serve a single purpose: To ensure that a company can hire the best graduates possible.

      Hire an intern. Pay them well. Treat them well. Give them the best training your company can provide. After their 3months -> year placement, send them back to complete their degree knowing far more than when they arrived at your company.

      If you do this (and really it isn't very hard), then the intern will usually contact you before they've spoken to any other companies (which means you get the long term pay off). They'll also tell the other students in their year that you're a really cool company (which leads to more CV's arriving in your office), and they'll also tell their lecturers how great you were at training them (which usually means those same lecturers will pass you details on their best students for next year).

    38. Re:Genius judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they sued, it means they learned something from the movie studio

    39. Re:Genius judge by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/docs/volunteers.asp

      If this is the sort of basic facts you do not know, you really should not be discussing this in public.

    40. Re:Genius judge by crgrace · · Score: 2

      There are several comic books I'd write for in exchange for zero pay. I worked stage crew for several concerts in college for zero pay, entirely voluntarily. Both examples are for-profit enterprises.

      And that would be legal. The issue is the companies are making the "interns" do non-internship related tasks.

      For example, say a comic book company takes you on as a "production intern" at no pay. Awesome, right? Then they make you spend all the time cleaning out toilets and they fire the janitor. Is that cool with you?

    41. Re:Genius judge by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Volunteering at a for profit business is not generally speaking legal.

      Citation required.

      Free labor is illegal, for many reasons think a little.

      Forced free labor is illegal for obvious reasons. Voluntary free labor should not be, think a little.

      Without consideration a contract is not valid. There must be quid pro quo.

      You've just given an opinion why a contract might not be valid, but that says nothing about the legality. I can work for someone without a contract. I can also agree to work for someone for non-monetary compensation.

      But, and here's the important point, if I make a contract to work for someone for that non-monetary compensation, the courts should stay out of it, and certainly not grant back-pay for something I agreed to do for no money.

    42. Re:Genius judge by radtea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I offered you a plain donut, you accepted a plain donut, that's the contract. Offer and acceptance. And that would probably be the last free donuts the office got.

      Now in plain fact YOU didn't offer anyone a "free donut": the corporation did. This is a critical distinction.

      Corporations exist solely by virtue of Nanny State interference in the operations of the Free Market.

      This gives corporations--which offer internships--a vastly privileged position in the negotiations they undertake with potential employees, interns, etc.

      Again: corporations are a privileged form of social organization by statute (the reforms to the Companies Act in Great Britain in the 1850's, and similar acts passed by parliaments and congresses around the world.) I own a corporation, and when I incorporated I did not engage in free an uncoerced trade with my fellow humans: I filed forms with the government that upon approval gave me as a corporate owner certain legal, state-defined and state-protected privileges that my employees do not have the benefit of.

      Advocates of Corporatism like yourself tend to forget this little detail: you as the owner or agent of a corporation have the backing of the massive, coercive power of the State. Your employees do not.

      So quit pretending you live in some mythical Free Market where the Nanny State hasn't tilted the scales massively in your favour. Show a little humanity and humility and decency, and remember that what the State giveth the People can damned well take away.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    43. Re:Genius judge by sribe · · Score: 2

      It's customary to pay interns for business, in particular IT, finance, accounting, engineering, product development, etc. For blue collar work it may be more common for a student to be in an apprenticeship program. The school usually ends up getting paid, and the work done is graded and part of the program. Teaching is similar as well, but it's part of the grade used for the degree.

      Yes, if you get course credit, then I think the Labor Dept and judges will pretty much accept that as proof of the educational value. It's generally up to the schools to set standards for these programs, and enforce them--including making the students aware of the standards and providing effective ways for them to report abuse. (Now there could abuse involving the school's collusion--free unskilled labor for the Dean's cousin or whatever, but that would be the rare exception, as opposed to the widespread abuse that's finally getting some attention.)

      Entertainment is off in it's own little world.

      As are publishing and fashion. Those 3 are the big offenders.

    44. Re:Genius judge by Macman408 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Internships are even flourishing in US industries where paid internships are the norm. I'm in Engineering, and I've never heard of anybody doing an unpaid internship. My alma mater's current statistics say interns in my field from the past year earned between $13 and $38 per hour, and $20/hour on average. (Full-time work after graduation pays $20-$53/hour, $35 on average.)

      Supply and demand factors a lot into this - good engineers are usually in demand, and there are many companies that will pay top dollar for both interns and full-time workers. In many industries, though, there is an excess supply of workers relative to jobs. This is how you end up with newspapers that have unpaid internships for journalism students - there are so many people that can do the job that they'll work for free. Similarly, you get people that are caught by the aura of the silver screen; they want to be big-time actors or movie producers, and they see that unpaid internship as their ticket in; but there are far too many of them for far too few jobs. (Especially if you count the labor pool that isn't lured to that particular industry, but is just generally qualified for that line of work - such as fetching lunch and coffee, answering phones, and assembling office furniture, as these interns did. Seems like an appropriate use for an MBA...)

      I think the judge's decision as summarized above makes sense - if they're doing real work, they deserve at least minimum wage. If you just want to run them through training classes and exercises, then by all means, they can do no work for no pay.

      The reason to hire paid interns is this: they get some money and experience. You get a worker that costs less, and a trial period to see if you like them. If they perform very well, you invite them back for another internship (if they're still in school) or a full-time job (if they're almost done), and bring their increased experience with them. If they perform poorly, then you know not to hire them again. This process is far easier for the employer than hiring somebody only to find out they stink, and then firing them. A sizable percentage of my employer's full-time workers started as interns; and a sizable percentage of interns are invited back for full-time positions.

    45. Re:Genius judge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unpaid internships are used as a class barrier in many industries. It is simply too expensive for any "lower class plebs" to get into fashion or whatever, because they have to pay cost of living in some place like New York for years on no wage to get a foot in the door.

    46. Re:Genius judge by sjames · · Score: 2

      Amusingly, I'm guessing that weven with a large populatrion ready to be slaves and laws permitting it, there would be few takers. Why would Walmart want slaves that they have to provide medical care, food, clothing, and shelter to (to protect their investment) when they can have minimum wage emoployees for less money?

    47. Re:Genius judge by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 2

      Don't mod parent down so much that it disappears. It must stay and be exposed to ridicule. It serves as a blatant example for why people should at least RTFS before posting, and also why this ruling is important - there is an entire rotten culture to be cleared up around unpaid internships, and this ruling is a start.

      You shall be ashamed to patronize people for so little that you repay them for their labor. It should also be quite clear the ruling does not apply to unpaid internships that actually have real educational value to the student (it's written right there FFS). Free labor for grunt work is simply abuse; both of students and regular employees. If we let people take these internship positions because "it looks good on their CV" or any other crap like that, it is a race down to the bottom of no benefit to the society.

      Goodbye to those kind of internships? If a job like that is lost, we really lose nothing. Paid internships and unpaid meaningful work are unaffected. If a student has to do meritless free labor to gain credits, then the college is equally guilty. The student may as well be jobless, and find a better way to learn something of value - the student pays the opportunity cost, so you have nothing to patronize them about. Everyone doing worthless internships is worse than nobody doing internships, except for the pockets of those abusive employers.

    48. Re:Genius judge by PraiseBob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My point is opportunity sometimes outweighs the downside of not getting paid.

      I fully understand the concept of being so desperate to have a job that you are willing to work for free in the hopes that it one day turns into a paying job. Ergo, you think the system is fair, because work experience is the payment rather than money. Are you aware that most slave-owners considered themselves to be good people? From the slavers perspective they provided free shelter, food and clothing to their slaves, and gave them a better quality of life, and longer life expectancy. They provided all these things in lieu of a salary, thus, it was in their eyes a fair system. You are echoing thousands of pro-slavery arguments from two centuries ago when you say that tertiary benefits make up for not paying a wage.

    49. Re:Genius judge by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unpaid internships are a scam. If the intern isn't doing work worth paying him minimum wage, what's the point of the internship? It becomes a rite of passage instead of on-the-job education.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    50. Re:Genius judge by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now in plain fact YOU didn't offer anyone a "free donut": the corporation did. This is a critical distinction.

      Not really. Someone in the corporation made the decision, they made the offer.

      This gives corporations--which offer internships--a vastly privileged position in the negotiations they undertake with potential employees, interns, etc.

      Untrue. As a potential intern I am free to accept or decline any offer. The "Nanny State" does not give the company the right to force me to accept what they offer. As a corporation I cannot stuff unfrosted donuts down the throats of my employees, I can only offer them the option and let them decide.

      you as the owner or agent of a corporation have the backing of the massive, coercive power of the State. Your employees do not.

      Wow. You've identified yourself as a corporate owner that employees should stay away from, simply because you think you have the "massive coercive power of the State" behind you. "You vill eat that cheap donut, employee. Ve haf vays of making you eat..."

      Show a little humanity and humility and decency, and remember that what the State giveth the People can damned well take away.

      You're the one claiming massive coercive power given to you by some mythical State, and I'm the one who needs to learn humility? Yes, I guess you'd think that based on your Power And Leverage over Mortal Man. Perhaps you ought to notice that a large part of labor law deals with LIMITING what you, in your Massive Coercive Mode, can actually do to anyone. Perhaps an experiment is in order to help you identify your mistakes? Why don't you, as Corporate Overlord, try ordering your female employees (but only the pretty ones) to wear bikinis to work on Friday. That's a simple test of your power over them granted by the State, I think. If you can do that and not wind up with a NLRB complaint that sticks, more power to you. You've successfully cowed your female workers into thinking you have power that you really don't. My guess would be that you'd be found guilty of sexual harassment upon complaints of the pretty women, and discrimination from a complaint by the ugly ones, and fined a bit of money. But, until you try, and since you think you're that powerful, you have no reason not to, right? Pictures or it didn't happen.

    51. Re:Genius judge by citylivin · · Score: 2

      "There are several comic books I'd write for in exchange for zero pay."

      Really? You would write a comic book for me that I could then sell and keep all the profits from. And you would do this unpaid?

      Thank you sir! you will put my kids through college! when can you start?

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    52. Re:Genius judge by dj245 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "There are plenty of paid internships out there already"

      That's a pretty broad statement that ignores a number of facts, such as:
      .....
      3) Not every location has companies nearby willing to take on interns (think small cities and rural areas)
      4) Not every paid internship is flexible enough to be viable

      These are one of the biggest advantages of paid internships. The "real" job market doesn't have an XXXX in every podunk town. The "real" job market often is inflexible and not viable for certain careers in certain locations. My university had 2 co-ops as a graduation requirement. I didn't want to stay in Maine anyway, but it forced me to pack my stuff into my car, rent a room for 3 months on Craigslist, and work in a moderate-sized city. It forced me to live independently and handle my own affairs. It eliminated any fear I had about moving cross-country for a job. It reinforced in me the idea that getting a job often has nothing to do with your experience and everything to do with your connections. These are not drawbacks. This is the way the world works. It is invaluable experience.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    53. Re:Genius judge by dj245 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unpaid internships are used as a class barrier in many industries. It is simply too expensive for any "lower class plebs" to get into fashion or whatever, because they have to pay cost of living in some place like New York for years on no wage to get a foot in the door.

      That is a huge clue to me that the job market for that industry is crap and I shouldn't be bothering with it. In certain industries, there will be 10 people standing behind you willing to do your job for less money and while working longer hours. I have a friend who used to work for a car crash-testing company. The hours pushed 80 hours a week, every week, and the pay was crap. But the company never had to look hard to find someone to work for them. That is not a career. That is a human gristmill.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    54. Re:Genius judge by Pubstar · · Score: 2

      You are still required to make at least minimum wage as a tipped employee though. If you make less than minimum wage, the employer has to comp you up to minimum wage on your paycheck.

    55. Re:Genius judge by tbannist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that analogy over simplifies the problem. The real issue is that the interns were promised an internship which would teach them valuable movie production skills, and instead they were given no training and used as unpaid waiters. The bait and switch is on the type of work they were promised that they would be doing. The company broke the contract and now owes them monetary compensation because they failed to provide the agreed upon compensation (training in the art of movie production).

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    56. Re:Genius judge by tbannist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've just given an opinion why a contract might not be valid, but that says nothing about the legality. I can work for someone without a contract. I can also agree to work for someone for non-monetary compensation.

      Which the students did and in a court-of-law they proved the company failed to provide the required non-monetary compensation that had been promised.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    57. Re:Genius judge by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If an internship is done properly for the benefit of the intern, then it's worth doing it unpaid.

      That's true, but the cost to an organization of having an internship like yours is already much greater than paying you minimum wage. It took your boss's time, facilities, etc. etc. If it's worth it to an organization to have an intern do real internship work, then paying minimum wage shouldn't be a barrier.

    58. Re:Genius judge by RevDisk · · Score: 2

      Our company hires a lot of interns for exactly this reason. Not sure on the pay, but they're treated as normal (if part time) employees. Time working counts towards things like ESOP, retirement, etc.

      Not sure they're all gushing at how wonderful we are, but I'm quite sure none will be telling horror stories and I hope they realize how very decent this company actually is. A lot of them probably lack experience working truly horrific jobs to properly gush. I did after I started here, compared to my last place. My former boss asked me to ensure my best friend's funeral didn't interfere with a project he had scheduled on a Sunday. That was a definite "It is time to go" sign.

    59. Re:Genius judge by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Informative

      But it is the judge's job to determine if working someone without pay is legal or not.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    60. Re:Genius judge by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Holy shit you're an idiot! Read this sentence:

      Holy shit, I QUOTED that sentence. Did you miss the word "EMPLOYEES"? I guess so.

      Now read this sentence: The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) defines employment very broadly, i.e., "to suffer or permit to work."

      Now read THIS sentence, which is in the same link:

      However, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the FLSA was not intended "to stamp all persons as employees who without any express or implied compensation agreement might work for their own advantage on the premises of another."

      I'm sure you didn't miss it, it's the very next sentence, clarifying the actual intent of FLSA and giving the sentiment of the court on the matter. It is a rather clear statement that the FLSA does NOT make all persons who "work upon the premises of another" an employee. No, they weren't talking about people who sneak in after hours to do things, they're talking about people who are doing things they are permitted to do.

      Suppose you see a pile of scrap in my shop yard. You come to me and say "I'll cart that away for you for free." Fine with me, it saves me money paying someone to do it (a direct benefit to me and replacing work that I would have to assign to someone else), but I'm not paying you (you're not my employee). You say "that was fun, can I do it every week?" I say "sure". No laws are broken. You are permitted to work on my premises without me paying you and you are not my employee.

      So, week five into this deal, I've not created much scrap, so you don't make more in selling it to someone else than it cost you to pick it up. Can you sue me for not "compensating" you sufficiently for your services as an employee? Nonsense. You're not my employee, and a lack of scrap doesn't turn you into one.

      So, since (1) all "employees" of for-profit private-sector employers must be paid,

      Not an issue.

      and (2) all persons who the employer "suffer[s] or permit[s] to work" are "employees,"

      No. SCOTUS has said that FLSA does not say that. You need to read the second sentence in the paragraph you quoted from.

  2. Re:There goes the industry... by 1s44c · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If interns have to get paid, there goes Hollywood, Print, and Radio media industries... Interns pretty much do everything these days.

    How about laying off some lazy fat management types to free up some money?

  3. Ripple effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unpaid internships are a huge crutch perpetuating class divisions here in the US. I wonder what will change now that rich kids no longer have the advantage of being able to say "I'll work for free."

  4. Internships are hard work! by glassware · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An internship should clearly be:

    - For a well-defined project;
    - For a limited time;
    - Paid (at a basic level);
    - As much work for the employer as it is for the intern.

    If you're not mentoring your interns heavily, you stand no chance of developing a talent pipeline. I wrote about my experiences with an internship program here: http://www.altdevblogaday.com/2012/04/18/lessons-learned-from-training-interns/

    The critical aspect is that you have to have the available bandwidth to mentor and supervise an intern. You have to give them clear goals and a clear chance to succeed.

    1. Re:Internships are hard work! by Whatsisname · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By having them unpaid, you are essentially making those jobs only be accessible to people from wealthy families. Only people from wealthy families can afford to pay the bills while working for free. Everyone else has to find a paying job, which would then exclude them from being able to gain entry into those fields.

    2. Re:Internships are hard work! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And who are you to decide that rather than the employer and the employee involved? You learn a lot just from being on a movie set, working in a hospital, or in a senator's office or in a science lab. These are experiences that are extremely hard to get and valuable and many people will gladly do them for free without any of your additional arbitrary conditions.

      Yes, and you're still allowed to "just be on a movie set", because "just being" isn't working. It's the working that's the problem, because there you are, in front of people making millions of dollars, and they're trying to save $10 an hour on a runner by getting you to do it instead...? That's pathetic, really....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:Internships are hard work! by dywolf · · Score: 2

      yes. fetching someone's coffee or being an unpaid janitor is really "educational" and totally "valuable experience" for a film school intern.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  5. Re:Fewer internships by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2

    Boohoo. Companies can't exploit as many people anymore! The horror!

  6. it's not the judge... by sribe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Unpaid internships have always been very restricted according to labor laws. It has always been the case that many companies in the entertainment and publishing and fashion industries were breaking the law. What is new is simply that a few former interns got fed up enough with their treatment that they are ratting out their unethical non-employers ;-)

  7. Internship system by intermodal · · Score: 2

    I can't comment on specifics, as I've never done an internship, but my impression is that the theory is to get the intern a little bit of exposure to the field they are trying to get into, with the byproduct of some internships leading to legitimate jobs or networking with those they interned with. However, if the internships are being used as an excuse to use these interns as nothing but grunt workers for tasks completely unrelated to their field, it seems the exercise is a waste on any but a networking level, and even then, they'd be cultivating contacts whom they will just resent anyway.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  8. Re:bye bye interns by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Minimum wage is so low that any company who wants to grow their own talent can pay it painlessly.

    The skilled trades, unlike various Elitist Fuck Corporations, pay their apprentices because otherwise said apprentices wouldn't be able to have food, clothing and shelter.Internships/apprenticeships are increasing as they are the (proven over CENTURIES) way to grow skilled tradespeople.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  9. some schools make you pay for the credits by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    some schools make you pay for the credits so work for free and pay to get credit for it.

    1. Re:some schools make you pay for the credits by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      When I did mine?
      I had to do 9 months worth. It was a requirement for graduation. Had to be paid and had to be in the field of my degree.

    2. Re:some schools make you pay for the credits by Obfuscant · · Score: 2

      Sure, for a charity. Volunteering at a for profit is not legal. http://www.dol.gov/elaws/esa/flsa/docs/volunteers.asp

      Nice try, but that cite doesn't support your claim. It says that:

      Under the FLSA, employees may not volunteer services to for-profit private sector employers.

      As a volunteer, I am not an employee. If you read the second sentence of what you cite:

      However, the Supreme Court has made it clear that the FLSA was not intended "to stamp all persons as employees who without any express or implied compensation agreement might work for their own advantage on the premises of another."

      In other words, the Supreme Court has ruled that volunteers are not employees under FLSA. As long as I'm not doing so with "express or implied compensation", I'm a volunteer. Clearly, it is not "implied compensation" for one to garner experience working in a field (such as the interns in this case), otherwise that would be their fairly agreed-to compensation for their internship and no back-pay would be granted.

      Once I am an employee I may no longer "volunteer" my services to that employer. Of course not, I'm an employee, and I'm not able to volunteer anymore. There is always the implied threat in such a case of termination for not "volunteering", and thus FLSA does make that illegal. As I said, INvoluntary volunteerism is clearly illegal. That's not what you have to cite. Your statement deals with true volunteerism.

      What you cite does not say that volunteers may not volunteer. Try again.

    3. Re:some schools make you pay for the credits by The+Cat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is it possible for anyone to have a conversation on the Internet without being a gigantic dick?

  10. Leapfrog Technology Group abuses interns by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Leapfrog Technology Group abuses interns

    Here is the job add with some added mark up

    Fun points are up 3 months full time with no pay

    and they have the balls to say "This means that if you don't believe there is any value to 12 weeks of unpaid on the job training, then this opportunity is not for you. We're looking for those individuals with long term aspirations in mind, not someone simply looking for a paycheck."

    added mark up start with --

    What is an Information Technology Internship?

    An IT Internship is both an educational experience and a potential full time job after completion.

    An IT Internship teaches students how to apply existing skills to real-world environments.

    An IT Internship gives students the opportunity to learn new skills to better prepare for the competitive job market after graduation.

    An IT Internship offers a variety of positions in at various types of organizations.

    --point 4 is part of payed jobs

    We offer internships to highly motivated individuals who want to enhance their IT exposure while working for a technology company focused on consulting and managed IT support. Our IT operations are located both in Chicago's Loop. We are currently seeking two interns to assist with our outsourced support program for our client located in the Chicagoland area.

    Desired Experience

    1 - 2 years --For a Work for free job?

    Desired Education

    High School or higher --OK

    Desired Technical Skills

    Windows 7, Internet Explorer, Outlook, Remote Access, Remote Desktop, Active Directory Administration, Basic Group Policy. --ok

    Desired Soft Skills

    Additional third party application skills and network infrastructure a plus. Ability to heavily multitask, excellent written and verbal skills, ability to understand business concepts and operations, independent worker, punctual, professional, asks detailed questions.

    Must enhance skills on their own time when necessary at home or in office. --so not only is this work for free it's work off the clock at home as well?

    Job Description and Career Opportunity

    Throughout the course of each day, Leapfrog Technology Group delivers the absolute highest quality and most reliable technical support and network design\implementation services to small and medium organizations between 5 to 150 computers with one or more servers. Leapfrog is a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner in the Midwest Region, focusing on network infrastructure, advanced network infrastructure and managed services. Established in 2002, the company employs a small group of highly capable senior engineers focused on providing IT strategy and ongoing operational support.

    We are currently seeking candidates through our Campus Relations Program for our Information Technology Development Program. This program provides challenging assignments and exceptional growth opportunities. In your role as a Help Desk Analyst, you will expand your skill set by providing prompt and effective support for our clients technical needs. Additionally, Leapfrog has a web design division, provides hardware\software sales, provides project management services, and in this role, additional non technical skills will be developed. This internship requires heavy multitasking, use of technology software to ease the burden on the support specialist, and is extremely challenging. Even for seasoned IT professionals, a role as an IT consultant is a very challenging one. We believe that this will be a position in which the staff is held to the highest standards and will be held accountable to use Leapfrog's proven methodologies.

    Must have the following qualities:

    Business savvy: You are smart and you understand the business implications of your ideas. You are successful in translating classroom training into workplace solutions.

    Results focused: You always give it your best but you're not satisfied until you've acco

  11. Re:There goes the industry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If interns have to get paid, there goes Hollywood, Print, and Radio media industries... Interns pretty much do everything these days.

    How about laying off some lazy fat management types to free up some money?

    Exactly, like the GP said, there go the movie, print, and radio industries. Nothing anyone can do about it now but wait for the sweet embrace of death.

    Wait, Hollywood would go belly-up? And we're complaining about this?

  12. Why unpaid in the first place? by zmaragdus · · Score: 2

    I don't get why internships were ever unpaid in the first place. In the course of training someone to do the job they are interning for, they end up providing some form of valuable work, even if it is at a lower level of effectiveness/efficiency than a highly-skilled employee. As an engineer, I have the good fortune of being in a field where internships are almost universally paid, and paid well for that matter. (Many engineering internships run from double to triple minimum wage.) Even my most basic intern experience (which is barely considered "engineering" by my standards) paid over double minimum wage (back in 2006). I can't fathom a sort of situation where an intern provides absolutely no useful work. Can anyone provide an example?

    --
    (((dB)))
  13. Re:bye bye interns by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Informative

    The minimum wage laws and the socialist State agenda already made it impossible for people to take very low paid position only to be apprentices, so apprenticeship is dead in America because of the minimum wage.

    Funny how high minimum wages and "socialism" to a degree much greater than in the US hasn't eradicated Germany's very popular system of apprenticeship.

    And first-world countries that do not have minimum wage set by law tend to have minimum wage worked out in collective bargaining between a union and management (which then applies to all employees, union or non-union). Do you think that that would lower wages?

  14. Re:Fewer internships by lightknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Working there of their own free will, so that they can gain experience, so that they can get a leg up when it comes time for applying for an Entry-level / Junior job, which they will not get, since it's more cost-effective to use free interns than what is now an 'expensive' employee.

    See, a typical company has numerous regular employees, and takes on a handful of interns during the summer / other times. These positions used to be paid; they weren't paid well, compared to when the person actually graduated, but then, they weren't being paid much, and interns were closer to observer status than the backbone of the company. The only organizations who really ran with the unpaid internships were the peace / welfare / non-profit types, who would argue that they couldn't afford it, etc., etc., and people let them go with that because of morality.

    Anyway, between the dotcom crash, the housing market crash, and so on, the market is getting so bad, that the business types, who occasionally need a reminder from their fore-bearers why certain lines are not crossed, decided to cross another line. "The market is bad, so all internships will now be unpaid" -> every-time the market takes a dip, a business type will try and cut something; it's almost like a play, and shows that their business is not being run well enough to weather the darker times. Anyway, like all bad ideas, it catches on; soon college students are spending their parent's money to drive to and from unpaid internships, on the gamble that it will all work out in the long run if they put the effort in. Between the rising cost of gas, rising cost of tuition, and senior-level positions being marketed as entry-level positions, they're rolling in debt, and the entire edifice is collapsing on itself.

    But the real problem? The real problem, from a business perspective, is this. Suppose I have a company with 12 regular employees, and I pick up 3 paid interns. My rival has a company with 3 regular employees, and 12 unpaid interns. From a strictly fiscal aspect, he's probably going to be more cost-effective than I am. So I downsize all but 3 of my regular employees, and bring on 24 unpaid interns. He responds by firing all but one of his regular employees, and bringing on 36 unpaid interns. He's probably still winning, from a cost effective standpoint...but chances are, neither of our companies are producing much, the quality is going to be very variable, and the market is looking in horror at what has been created -> an incredibly unstable company, where the employees have little reason to be there, can leave in a heartbeat, and so on. The unpaid internship, like email spam and the old registrar's policy of 'trying a domain name for a month before paying for it,' has been abused; any company that cannot afford to pay for an internship (which rarely exceeds, what, the teens in terms of renumeration per hour?) is probably on shaky ground to begin with.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  15. Re:There goes the industry... by Whatsisname · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If those industries cannot survive without a large pool of free labor, then they should go the way of the dodo.

  16. Re:Fewer internships by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    All this means is that there will be fewer internships, thus fewer opportunities for unskilled students (or otherwise) to gain experience. Keep in mind that these students are working of their own free will.

    There will be fewer internships, because the crappy worthless ones will be axed. There will not be fewer opportunities for students to gain experience, because the genuine internships — the ones that are not-for-business-gain and the ones that are for business gain, but paid — will continue. So there will be just as much experience gained, although there will be fewer internships on CVs. Which will not only stop the exploitation, but it will make having an internship on your CV more attractive to potential employers, because it will now say you have actual real experience in something more useful than running down to the local store for a box of donuts and a 6 pack of Mountain Dew....

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  17. Re:Another freedom gone by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You used to be free to die in the gutter. You used to be free to breathe asbestos on the job. You used to be free to be raped by the sweat shop owner.

    These regulations exist for good reason. I am offering a free one way trip to Somalia so you can check out the alternative. As part of my education for slashdot libertarians program I do require a refund if you ever leave Somalia.

  18. Re:internships should be paid by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

    If someone wants to volunteer for a position on their own time, then that's okay--but that's not what I'd call an internship position, and the system shouldn't be set up to have people needing to volunteer full-time.

    That's not OK, because then you have companies exploiting the constant stream of desperate unemployed people looking to get the experience that gets them their next job.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  19. Prisons by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 2

    If you want free labor and you're a for-profit business?

    Go to the Prison-Industrial Complex, pay them a low fee, and get your labor for next to nothing (or free).

    This has been about the only growth industry in the US for decades.

    This is very appealing to Red states as it gets them a good chunk of money both over and under the table whilst also satisfying their twisted Purtianical sadism fetishes. The fact that most of the sla^H^H^H workers are minorities is just gravy.

    Very related: for-profit prison companies are now lobbying if not outright writing ever more laws with prison sentences as it directly increases their profits. Greed and sick, religion-driven punishment fantasies are the twin reasons the US has more citizens imprisoned percentage-wise than anywhere else.

  20. unpaid interns are not free by D1G1T · · Score: 2

    I ran a company for quite a few years. The summer students I had were paid something, but I have to say that the assumption that employers are getting something for nothing is simply ridiculous. I had to do background checks before allowing them access to my business assets. I had to supply them with desk-space, a computer, a phone. I had to assign someone to train and then to supervise them. Most of their "work" was them learning to do the job. I had a couple who worked out really well, but most were revenue-neutral at best. The last few years I ended up not doing it even when kids begged to work for me for nothing. I would liken it to the opportunities available in international aid. Kids go off and volunteer at orphanages in India or whatever. These days, NGOs usually charge their volunteers a fee in exchange for the opportunity. They have figured out that, in the end, it _costs_ them money to host volunteers.

    1. Re:unpaid interns are not free by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hear similar complaints from businesses all the time: "Employees cost me X amount of money every year!"

      In fact, I hear it so often, I've taken to asking them, "Then why do you have any, if all they ever do is cost you money?"

      Never have gotten a straight answer...

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  21. Re:very stupid judge by sribe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the one and only purpose of interning is to have the opportunity to shine. It's difficult to get hired as an employee -- there's a lot to prove and a lot of competition. It's way easier as an intern. And it's the foot in the door. You do have the opportunity to do really well, get noticed, and eventually get hired. And all you need to do is to work for free until that happens. That's pretty swell.

    That's the lie they tell you, but don't believe it. They're really just using you. Statistically, in the fields that abuse unpaid internships, those with internships on their resumes get hired after graduation at a rate about 2% higher than those without.

  22. RTFS by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

    From TFS:

    Pauley ruled, in accordance with criteria laid out by the U.S. Department of Labor, that unpaid internships should be educational in nature and specifically structured to the benefit of the intern, and reasoned that if interns are going to do grunt work like regular employees, then they should be paid like regular employees."

    All this judge did was rule in accordance to existing law - that interns are there to be taught the tricks of the trade, not be your goddamn coffee mule, and if you're going to utilize them as such, they must be paid for their efforts (and rightfully so).

    For fuck's sake, guys, learn to read at least the damn summary before you go off on a nonsensical tangent; perhaps you'll learn to think better of it.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  23. Re:bad idea by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

    But they have a simple solution: they can just walk away from their unpaid internship without losing anything.

    Often, an internship is associated with college credit for which the student has paid tuition. Quitting an internship would be like dropping a class and, after some point in the semester, there's no refund for that tuition.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  24. piracy and free labor by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2

    I recall you as one of the people who insists that copying is stealing. You vehemently denounce piracy, saying that artists deserve to be paid, and people who just make a copy without paying are cheating the artists. Pirates are not paying for the labor, the hard work artists put into the creation of their works, and are therefore allegedly making it impossible to earn a living from art.

    But interns? If artists deserve compensation for labor, and not just once, but each time their work is used, surely interns deserve some pay for their labor, just once?

    How do you justify what seems to me to be a huge double standard?

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  25. Re:very stupid judge by sribe · · Score: 2

    I agreed to it going in. that's no illegal.

    Yes, it is. If you did actual work, it was an evasion of the minimum wage laws.

    for the company to give me a four month interview is not immoral.

    It stopped being an interview when you started doing useful work.

    For me to take advantage of it, and wind up competing with six other interns is not illegal. For me to get the job offer when others did not is not immoral.

    I agree.

    They didn't refuse to pay me. They promissed that they wouldn't pay me.

    Utter and complete bullshit. If you had refused their kind promise not to pay you, then they would have paid you? No? Well then, you should be literally embarrassed to have even written a comment so stupid.

    What's your problem here? Someone who didn't expect to get paid, and could leave at any time if they didn't like the work, stuck around and didn't get paid. They never needed to do the work. They could have walked out the door at any time. They literally had nothing to lose.

    Good for you. My problem is with the immorality and illegality of a company refusing to pay its entry-level workers. And even more so in industries where cabals of companies have colluded to create a situation where young people believe that they can't get, and indeed do not even deserve to be, paid for their labor. If you really can't understand why that is wrong, then you're either too deep in denial about how you were exploited to be able to recognize the truth, or you're a sack-of-shit sociopath who can't wait to be in the position where you yourself can profit from free labor.