Slashdot Mirror


Google Aims To Cull Child Porn By Algorithm, Not Human Review

According to a story at VentureBeat, "Google is working on a new database of flagged images of child porn and abuse that can be shared with other search engines and child protection organizations. The database will help create systems that automatically eliminate that sort of content. ... If the database is used effectively, any flagged image in the database would not be searchable through participating search engines or web hosting providers. And maybe best of all, computers will automatically flag and remove these images without any human needing to see them." Here's the announcement.

5 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. What is the point of this? by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is the point of automatically removing child porn so it's not searchable. That's not the problem with child porn.

    The problem with child porn is real children are being really abused to make it.

    Making it "not searchable" doesn't stop that. Arresting the people who are making it does.

    1. Re:What is the point of this? by TheBlackMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly.

      Also, I am browsing the net since at least 12 years and i have NEVER found child porn by accident or whatsoever. I am thinking that child porn can be found only in the "dark internet".

      So that makes one wonder what Google's real motives are.

    2. Re:What is the point of this? by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True, which means this isn't a solution. It is about as much as a search engine can do though, so it's to Google's credit.

    3. Re:What is the point of this? by ebno-10db · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Realistically this is just a feel good effort. No one is going to seriously criticize Google for this, and they can say "we're doing our part". Not that their part really helps anything, but that's not Google's fault.

      So that makes one wonder what Google's real motives are.

      Good PR. I'm as cynical as the next person, but PR is often the only motive for these things. If they had a sinister motive, they'd just offer to help the NSA some more.

  2. Not sure I agree 100% that this is a good idea.... by realsilly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me be clear about this. I DO NOT condone child pornography at all; I find it foul and disgusting. But there is a over-reaching that I think may go on here. If I purchase a server and I engage in a P2P network, then it is not Google nor any one else's business what I transmit. If the server is a public server or one owned by a company (such as Google), then I would agree they have every right to remove such foul content from their servers.

    Yes I would rather that the people who engage in this be stopped. But whenever programs like this are created they tend to start out being put to use with the best of intentions, but will likely be used for other more nefarious purposes. If this algorithm is used to sniff out child pornography, it could be modified to sniff out a information about a political party and quell it, or news that a government agency doesn't want people to know about.

    With all that has recently come to light about the spying by the US Govt. can you really say that this with 100% certainty that this technology won't be abuse for other purposes? I can't.

    Again I DO NOT condone Child Pornography.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.