Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft To Start Dumping Surface RT To Schools For $199

onyxruby writes "In a move that will remind many of Apple in the '80s, Microsoft is going to start dumping Surface RT computers to educational institutions. In an effort to try to gain mindshare for their struggling Surface RT platform, Microsoft is giving away 10,000 Surface RTs to teachers through the International Society for Technology in Education. They're also preparing to offer $199 Surface RTs to K12 and higher education institutions. The strategy of flooding the educational market was quite successful for Apple. Unfortunately for Microsoft, today's computers require management and the Surface RT presents significant management challenges in terms of the inability to join the computer to a domain or available management tools."

28 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How would this remind people of Apple in the 80s? The Apple II was not a dud product being price dumped to clear inventory.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Surface RT is not a dud, it is a great product and millions have been sold.

      -Steve

    2. Re:Huh? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      But it does say it wasn't a dud.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:Huh? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 3, Funny

      Your argument is like a McDonald's sign: Billions and Billions sold.

              Doesn't say anything about quality.

              Doesn't say anything about value.

      An analogy! Let me try: your argument is like a car: it doesn't understand what words mean.

      Dud
      a : one that is ineffectual; also : failure <a box-office dud>

      Love it or hate it, the Apple II was a massive success, becoming one of the best-selling computers of its day thanks in large part to VisiCalc, its affordable price, and the wide availability of apps for it, which allowed it to become an important component of the PC revolution of the '80s. Suggesting that the Apple II was overpriced and outdated (as you did in an earlier comment) is preposterous and factually inaccurate, and suggesting it's a dud on the grounds of quality and value (as you did in your last comment) is irrelevant since those are only indirectly related to whether something is a dud (not to mention that those arguments make no sense in historical contexts). The only thing you got correct was that the volume discount being offered by Apple to educational institutions was, while aggressive, still nowhere comparable to the sort of dumping that we're seeing Microsoft do here.

    4. Re:Huh? by PRMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      The big thing Apple had going for it compared to Atari and Commodore was expansion. They had slots that you could put cards in that allowed it to do things:

      Serial cards (RS-232 serial interface)
      Parallel cards (Centronics/IEEE 1284 parallel interface)
      Multifunction I/O cards
      Internal modems
      80 column (or more) text cards (e.g., Videx)
      PAL Color graphics cards (required for color graphics in early European Apples)
      RGB cards
      Floppy disk controllers
      Hard disk controllers
      Network adapters
      Co-processor cards
      Memory expansion cards
      Accelerators
      Realtime clock cards
      Music and sound cards
      Miscellaneous cards

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    5. Re:Huh? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      WindowsRT reminds me of the PCjr. IBM wanted to sell a cheaper version of the PC and so they made a crippled version so it wouldn't compete with the high priced units. It withered and died. Now MS seems to be repeating the idea. Very Ironic. They took IBM's monopoly away from them and now they repeat IBM's early mistakes with hardware. I love it.

  2. Re:perfect by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, Surface RT requires that secure boot must not be possible to disable. The only way to get Linux on these things is to install an additional key or an approved boot loader, and that can be very complicated.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. Re:perfect by MrDoh! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sounds like something schoolkids could figure out pretty quick.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
  4. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by femtobyte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remembering the time when Apple was pushing Apple II's in schools, I sure don't recall kids "hating it" because they felt "forced to use something" --- for the majority of kids, it was their first and only opportunity to use a computer at all. Playing those Apple II games was something new and exciting, that they'd be unlikely to have access to at home (without both well-off and technologically cutting-edge parents).

    In this case, however, I agree with you --- a lot of kids (pretty much all of them from a middle class socioeconomic background) will already have seen better computers (or even have one in their pocket). Dumping crappy cheap tech on schools for a tax writeoff and some publicity isn't particularly going to be awe-inspiring for the kids. But, it will stall school administrations from considering switching to less Microsoft-centric platforms for at least a few more years; and, even if the kids don't like it, they'll be blocked from learning much about alternatives when they have to do classwork in Microsoft Office instead of [insert superior alternatives here].

  5. Should have called RT something else... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What they did was confuse the hell out of people. At first Microsoft was touting a tablet that could run Windows Apps called the surface. What they meant was the Surface pro. Instead the device that got released first was the RT and it still had the name "windows". Most people looking at them, and I know of one business that bought a couple, did so thinking they could run existing windows programs. They got 'em home and learned they couldn't.

    At least Apple makes it clear that while underneath the hood, both MacOS and iOS share many of the same parts, they are entirely different OS's designed for different purposes. Microsoft failed to do that with the Surface.

    The next problem is that the Surface Pro is $1000. At that price what is the incentive to buy it? You can buy a convertible ultra book for just a few dollars more.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:Should have called RT something else... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...if they called them "Sad Meals" no one would buy them.

  6. Re:perfect by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Especially since Linux drivers for a Windows tablet thats apparently designed be bootloader-locked aren't going to be forthcoming.

  7. Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by default+luser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It comes with Office, so it's a business computer that can also play the tablet game, right?

    Except that there's no Outlook. Try getting business done without that.

    And you can't join a domain. That goes hand-in-hand with the above.

    And most critical to anyone who just wants to get work done: it's not x86-compatible, and you're limited to Windows Store apps.

    Who the hell came up with this horrible hodgepodge of an OS? And who expected anyone to pay a premium price for it? They'll be lucky if they can get these things to move even for $200!

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

    1. Re:Never understood the purpose of Windows RT by Lluc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that there's no Outlook. Try getting business done without that.

      Actually, the latest version of Office RT (2013) does include Outlook.

  8. I've actually used an RT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm probably one of the few on here who have used an RT. Picked one up for $99 + keyboard at TechEd, and used it all week at the conference to take notes/surf/do work. Honestly, for your basic user who wants surfing/word docs, it's perfectly fine.

    Also - I have an iPad that I love, but I couldn't dream of doing the work I was doing on the surface. The desktop mode is very nice, plus it just seems more workable when I can VPN in just like my PC at home. When comparing iPad to Surface for doing actual work, it's not event close, the Surface wins by a landslide.

    1. Re:I've actually used an RT by Lluc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah I'm amazed by the amount of Surface RT hate in this thread. I wonder how much of it is typed on an iPad :)

      I think that a $200 tablet for web browsing, email, and remote desktop would be pretty useful despite the limited app store. Maybe it's time to send my Touchpad to ebay and try one of these out...

    2. Re:I've actually used an RT by maccodemonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that a $200 tablet for web browsing, email, and remote desktop would be pretty useful despite the limited app store. Maybe it's time to send my Touchpad to ebay and try one of these out...

      Except the $200 price only applies if you are a school buying for your students... An individual can't get that price.

  9. BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good I was looking to replace my HP Touchpad.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by Richy_T · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a table that wobbles.

    2. Re:BUUUUUURRRRRNNNNN! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have a table that wobbles.

      Good plan. You can save that coaster for a cold one. Get one for me, too, while your at it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  10. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by bmk67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did they? Because I went to high school during that time period, and it's my recollection that every geek wanted an Apple.

    Most of them ended up with Commodores, or worse.

  11. Re:take a dump by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Without x86 legacy applications, there just isn't that much reason to bother with Windows.

    On the other hand, pretty much anything available for Linux is available as source and can be rebuilt for alternative platforms. If not by the author than by some interested 3rd party.

    Windows on ARM is a shadow of it's x86 variant.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  12. Re:Huh? The Microsoft Hamburger by vettemph · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can feed it to my dog. ...and when he 'reboots', my other dog will try to eat it.

    --
    The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
  13. Re:Good. by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would have been glad to have one... if not for the bootloader lockdown bullshit.

    Foot, meet bullet.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  14. Re:Because that worked so well for Apple? by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, Surface may or may not be crappy, but all kids these days have already got their allegiance to ipad/iphone or Android, and dumping Surface at a slight discount is not necessarily going to do much for them. Hey, but if I were them, I'd probably try it too. Worth a shot. But my guess is MS will get bored with this quickly like they do with most of their ideas that don't generate instant cash, and that will be that.

  15. Re:perfect by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because you have the make-for-windows tablet for only $199, or your principal buys it and hands it to you and tells you to use it. Thus you need to put a reasonable OS on it to make it usable. Remember these RTs dont come with Windows 8, they come with Windows 8 RT, which means metro-only except for some extremely limited desktop, and all apps must be signed and approved (ie, Microsoft Store ONLY). Thus they ship as unusable devices by default.

  16. Re:perfect by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Informative

    All executables on Windows 8 RT must be signed before they're allowed to run. You won't even get an "are you sure" dialog box. Thus no software is possible without prior permission from Microsoft. Sure you may have some nice byte code emulator but it's useless if you can't get it signed.

  17. I dunno by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the schools should be paid more than $199 per RT.