Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Relicensing of MySQL Man Pages Just a Bug

Posted by Unknown on from the oracle-still-evil dept.

An anonymous reader writes "As reported earlier on Slashdot it appeared the license covering the MySQL man pages was changed from the GPL to something less good. However, as speculated, this appears to be a bug." The build system was grabbing the wrong files, oops. The fix should be coming shortly: "Once the fixes have been made to the build system, we will rebuild the latest 5.1, 5.5, 5.6 releases plus the latest 5.7 milestone and make those available publicly asap."

4 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. It's only called a bug... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... because someone noticed it. <_<

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:It's only called a bug... by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, with that logic, Oracle never does anything evil.

      Ah, to paraphrase, "there is a principle which is a bar against all knowledge and will never fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- and that is contempt prior to investigation." You can't simply say "because this person/group/organization has done so many evil things in the past, this has to be as well." You start engaging in that kind of thinking regularly and before you know it you'll be a talk show host or running for political office.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  2. You mean Big Bad Oracle really isn't up... by exabrial · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know Oracle is a supposed to be super evil lawyer driven blah blah blah... but just so we get the story straight, Monty sells MySql to Sun, Oracle buys Sun, Monty wants MySql back as MariaDb. At this point, Monty and the MySql community have cried wolf one to many fucking times. I really just don't care anymore.

  3. Color me surprised. by flimflammer · · Score: 3, Funny

    That people were entertaining notions otherwise was asinine, regardless of it involving Oracle. This might have actually been something to worry about if the documents weren't already dual licensed. This sort of mistake has been made time and time again, and will continue to be made time and time again.