Slashdot Mirror


2 Men Accused of Trying To Make X-Ray Weapon

gurps_npc writes "Two radical pro-Israel terrorists were caught in upstate NY when they tried to solicit money from various honorable Jewish organizations to build a truck based x-ray weapon. They intended to drive the truck around and then turn on the x-ray machine, focusing on enemies of Israel. But the Jewish organizations they tried to solicit money from refused to participate. Instead they called the FBI, who promptly set up a sting. The men were arrested before the machine was in working order."

48 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. A conspiracy... by Roachie · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I can see right thru it.

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    1. Re:A conspiracy... by similar_name · · Score: 5, Funny

      My x-ray gun is purely for hunting.

    2. Re:A conspiracy... by Smallpond · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "the undercover investigator brought Crawford X-ray tubes to examine for possible use in the weapon, followed by their technical specifications a month later. ... Investigators gave Feight $1,000 to build the control device and showed the men pictures of industrial X-ray machines they said they could obtain."

      Hmm.. wonder whose idea this whole plot was. We've only heard one side so far.

    3. Re:A conspiracy... by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

      They weren't Islamic terrorists. Think People's Front of Judea.

    4. Re:A conspiracy... by anagama · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Apparently, Crawford was an industrial engineer for GE and a KKK member -- which just makes it all that much weirder that they'd try to sell it to Jewish organizations.

      http://news.yahoo.com/york-men-accused-plotting-build-radiation-weapon-204445880.html

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re:A conspiracy... by durrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you seriously expect something refined from a KKK member? Their sole existence seems to be oriented towards being used for parody.

    6. Re:A conspiracy... by flyneye · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ra-di-a-tion. Yes, indeed. You hear the most outrageous lies about it. Half-baked goggle-box do-gooders telling everybody it's bad for you. Pernicious nonsense! Everybody could stand a hundred chest X-rays a year! They oughta have 'em, too. --Dr.J.Frank Parnell

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    7. Re:A conspiracy... by flyneye · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, The Judean Peoples Front.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    8. Re:A conspiracy... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you seriously expect something refined from a KKK member? Their sole existence seems to be oriented towards being used for parody.

      It's kind of a nuisance that the biggest fans of the 'white race' tend to be walking arguments against it. Why don't they try the "Ha! I'll show the mud races what's what by being a successful human being!" a bit more often?

    9. Re:A conspiracy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Paul Ross Evans: attempted bombing of an abortion clinic.
      Kevin W. Harpham: attempted bombing of a civil rights parade.
      Marie Mason: firebombing of a Michigan State University research lab.

      Muslim terrorists are in the minority in the US. It's just that the others don't usually get more than regional coverage.

    10. Re:A conspiracy... by sjwt · · Score: 4, Informative

      " i was surprised that microwaves aren't ionizing rads since they are often referred to as cooking from the insides.."

      But they don't cook from the inside out.. Extremely old microwaves used to come with a thermometer that stuck down into the middle of what you were cooking so they could slowly cook from the outside in and would stop when your food was fully cooked. Newer microwaves realised that ppl quickly catch on to how to use them and a billion microwave cookbooks out there and removed the mostly redundant piece of equipment.

      Not sure why you are spreading that old myth, and haven't worked it out yourself when you undercook something your self and find its still cold in the middle, but eh.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    11. Re:A conspiracy... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Easy mistake. I made the same mistake when I first read it. Had to go back and read it a couple times before I saw it. Yeah, we all know know that not all terrorists are Muslim. But we're not used to it.

      Short memories. I remember when a large proportion of terrorists were Catholic.

    12. Re:A conspiracy... by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      In case you haven't noticed, not every terrorist and terrorist-wannabe is a genius.

      Bitch, please. Muslim terrorists build bombs out of pressure cookers. These Jewish terrorists wanted to build a fucking death ray.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    13. Re:A conspiracy... by alantus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bitch, please. Muslim terrorists build bombs out of pressure cookers. These Jewish terrorists wanted to build a fucking death ray.

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish. They were trying to get funding by jewish organizations by promising to target enemies of Israel.
      Instead of funding them, the jewish organizations contacted the FBI.

      So no, the jews in this story are not the terrorists, in fact, they are the heroes.

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

    14. Re:A conspiracy... by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish. They were trying to get funding by jewish organizations by promising to target enemies of Israel.
      Instead of funding them, the jewish organizations contacted the FBI.

      So no, the jews in this story are not the terrorists, in fact, they are the heroes.

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      There is nothing like THE Jews in this story. Some Jews were heroes.

      But what other kind of terrorists would ask Jewish organizations for funding? Muslim terrorists? definitly no. Anti-Gouvernment homegron style terrorists? No, don't think so. Neo-Nazis as "pro-Israel"? Aeehmm.. most definitly no.

      --
      bickerdyke
    15. Re:A conspiracy... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that the terrorists are not jewish.

      Has anyone said they're not Jewish? Or that they are Jewish?

      It lookes like the slashdot editor (samzenpus) is either trying to discredit the jews on purpose

      How? By not implying that they're Jewish? The only person who's stated that they're Jewish is FatLitteMonkey.

      or is too stupid to write a decent summary.

      a) samzenpus didn't write it b) samzenpus probably didn't read it

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    16. Re:A conspiracy... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The summary does imply that they are Jewish,

      Where? It says they're pro-Israel, that's all. One can be pro-Israel without being Jewish.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    17. Re:A conspiracy... by jabuzz · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is all the Irish ones that you spent decades shielding from justice back in the U.K. because it suited you. They where allowed to openly raise funds, and convicted terrorists where not extradited back to the U.K.

    18. Re:A conspiracy... by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, what I'm saying is that black people are disproportionately affected by those laws. Rates of drug use are roughly the same between white and black communities. Black people get arrested for drugs 4-5x more often than white people. You can figure the rest out for yourself.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. pro-Israel terrorists? by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

    No such thing!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, they're called "Americans" ;-)

    2. Re:pro-Israel terrorists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      OH, SNAP!

      No, its spelled "Oy Vey!"

  3. Whatever gave them that idea? by MassiveForces · · Score: 4, Funny

    rumor has it they got their x-ray training right under the nose of the TSA without raising suspicion

    1. Re:Whatever gave them that idea? by klingers48 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly when someone tells you that they don't need to learn how to land the X-ray machine is the point you should be ringing the FBI.

  4. Remember, when god is on your side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything is acceptable. burning witches, executing gays, xraying muslims, rocketing israelis, raping kids, car bombing protestants. its all good as long as god agrees....and if you read your books there are passages that'll help you along :)

  5. Is that it?! by crioca · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gotta say, after everything I've heard on the Internet; the Zionist conspiracy really doesn't live up to the hype...

  6. Nazi scum! by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously the Jews that turned in the pro-Israelis are self-hating Nazi scum!

  7. I used to work with stuff like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    http://www.balteau.com/upload/normal/ceram35_hx.jpg

    Big old X-ray tubes that are used for taking pictures of welds in bulkheads, etc. I heard a story that some guy in the '80s killed one of his co-workers on purpose by aiming the tube through a wall at his victim. Having worked with the bigger tubes, I can see it.

  8. Re:weeeeak by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Informative

    no, you should read about the foot x-ray machines some shoe stores used in the 1940s, they gave some people 20 REM of dose! It doesn't take that much power to make dangerous levels of X-Ray radiation.

  9. Re:The two were also apparently plotting by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    to demand that people take off their shoes.

    Maybe they can get jobs with the TSA.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  10. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    1) The editors at Slashdot who curate the submissions don't bother to check the basic sources

    That's OK, we were all new here once.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  11. Odd morning by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What's that big truck in front of our office?"

    "I don't know, and why is your spleen showing on my laptop?"

  12. Re:weeeeak by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Exactly, the gear could be man-portable. This is actually an amazingly brilliant plot, you're not around when the victim dies, you leave no evidence on the victim, even if someone spots you during the assassination they couldn't tell you're killing the person (just holding a suitcase near them or backing them with a backpack). This is the most impressively clever thing I've heard of in ages, I'm kind of jealous I never thought of it myself.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. Re:The system worked by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really glad to hear that it was Jewish Americans who turned the crazies in. Hopefully many of the mosques in America that encounter radical and/or terrorism sympathetic persons will rise to the occasion and do the same when they hear something actionable, instead of waiting for the government to find the bad guys without assistance.

    That is, in fact, the norm rather than the exception.

    Did I dodge the knee jerk liberal piling-on?

    No, you just told us that you don't know how liberals think.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  14. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Informative

    2) The editors at Slashdot have some sort of Antisemitic agenda

    Why would I say that? If you bother to read the second sentence of the article you will notice that the weapon builders were not Jews.

    The summary neither says nor implies that they were. It's perfectly compatible with the linked article.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Timothy McVeigh. Blew up Oklahoma building.

    Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber.

    David Koresh and the Branch Davidians.

    So many idiots going in and shooting up schools.

    Not one of them muslim.

  16. Re:radical terrorist by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "radical terrorist" is something interesting. That suggests there could be some "moderate terrorist". Anyone encountered that weird kind of terrorist?

    They don't tend to be called 'terrorists'(because, by virtue of being moderate, they use violence to achieve ends that good, upstanding, people agree with); but nothing about being a terrorist actually requires any particular flavor of agenda, just the presence of somebody opposed to whatever your agenda is, and the willingness and capability to employ coercive violence and fear.

    Somebody like Sir Arthur Harris would arguably qualify. He was an ideologically unexceptional commander of British air forces during WWII, and implemented the British 'saturation bombing' efforts against civilian targets and infrastructure. As he candidly described it:
     
    "the destruction of houses, public utilities, transport and lives, the creation of a refugee problem on an unprecedented scale, and the breakdown of morale both at home and at the battle fronts by fear of extended and intensified bombing, are accepted and intended aims of our bombing policy. They are not by-products of attempts to hit factories."

    If that doesn't qualify as 'terrorism', I'm not certain what would; but he's a deeply un-radical figure, pretty much heading to the office every day to implement the (widely prevailing) logic of "Total War" in the service of his government, a not-exactly-radical line of business.

    (I don't particularly mean to pick on the British, relatively staid people who execute what are unambiguously terror tactics aren't especially uncommon, or confined to any particular nation, he just happened to be a good example that I hit on quickly.)

  17. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by black3d · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While the editors are pretty bad around here, more people seem to pick up on the facts more quickly than folks here. Much of the discussion still seems to be about "Israel" and "Jews", when these two guys were neither Israeli or Jewish. They're simply far right-wing nuts who figured that Jews would happily "give them money" on the promise that they'd use it to "kill their enemies" - in other words they were counting on their own negative image of Jews to be fulfilled to in turn feed their own greed. They're no more pro-Israel than a shop selling Halal meat in order to cater to their customers needs is "pro-Iran".

    --
    "The true measure of a person is how they act when they know they won't get caught." - DSRilk
  18. Re:weeeeak by joe_frisch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was really hoping that no one would think of portable radiation generators for this. The only way to stop this is to control some very broadly useful technologies - high voltage generators, vacuum equipment. The basic problem is that a clever person can do a huge amount of damage with readily available, difficult to regulate equipment. Unless we eliminate the situations that motivate terrorists (politically very difficult), we will either need ever increasing security and monitoring, or we will need to accept that a fair number of people will die. I'm willing to accept the deaths, but I don't think most americans are.

  19. Really now? by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dr. Fred Mettler, the U.S. representative on the United Nations' Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, was unfamiliar with the specifics of Crawford's plans but said it's unlikely such a device could work. Radiation can be narrowly beamed, as it is in some cancer treatments, but the accelerators require huge amounts of electricity, are not easily portable and any target would have to remain still for a long time.

    "I don't know of any of these that you can use like a gun to aim at someone on the street," Mettler said.

    http://www.labx.com/v2/adsearch/detail3.cfm?adnumb=491358#MoreDesc

    Mobile unit, runs on batteries, would fit in a van. However....its only a mobile xray unit. Claims ~1900 exposures per charge. I doubt it is made to run in continuous output.... and still only going to be effective at a very short range.

    Maybe if you parked a van along a route that your target walked several times a day, for multiple days.... and his path took him within a few feet of the side of the van....and the van.... its not a metal body is it? That's going to be a problem too. Not entirely impossible that a dangerous dose could be delivered, and by dangerous I mean like, increasing his chance of cancer and possibly thyroid or kidney issues in his old age sort of dangerous.

    So two things:

    1. He went to jewish groups, after going to the Klan:

    Crawford also traveled to North Carolina in October to solicit money for the weapon from a ranking member of the Ku Klux Klan, who informed the FBI.

    But Doesn't the Klan hate the Zionists? Huh? This guy is just playing the I hate muslims thing....ok, that works I guess. Still, a bit of a douche move to pitch it to the Klan and then adopt the "Enemies of Israel" spiel. Good salesmanship I guess.

    2. This seems overly complex and expensive. Shit, at that point, why not just buy some laser diodes and have a hand portable device capable of blinding someone permenantly from a safe distance, and instantly? Oh.... wait... that would only cost a few hundred bucks.

    So I am thinking the scam artists who were looking to take some people for some cash they couldn't rightly sue him for the return of, got caught up in a bigger con game where the FBI set them up to con us into thinking that we really need their protection.

    I bet you if they didn't arrest them when they did, they would have driven off with the van and disappeared, gone back to the KKK and offered their services, and then shopped around for more suckers. If they finds out it doesn't expose film, they would have had some films made up and claimed its too dangerous to be nearby while it runs.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  20. Re:weeeeak by sploxx · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is actually not a new idea. In East Germany, the STASI is alleged to have done that:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/352461.stm

    Pretty scary and brutal stuff.

  21. Re:Every pro-israel is a terrorist by default by Martin+Blank · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fascism combines elements of both the right and the left while being moderate on few, if any, aspects.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  22. Re:Supremely Irresponsible Reporting. Shame on /. by alantus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How were you modded informative? From the article:

    "Crawford approached Jewish organizations last year looking for funding and people to help him with technology that could be used to surreptitiously deliver damaging and even lethal doses of radiation against those he considered enemies of Israel."

    How are they not pro-Israel? Not everything that you disagree with is anti-semitic. Really the only bias evident is your own.

    And if they wanted to request funding from Iran they would have offered to use their weapon against the enemies of Iran.
    Would that mean they are pro-Iran?

    I don't know if you are anti-semitic or not, but an anti-semitic would jump to the same conclusion you did without a really thinking about it. Perhaps you are not anti-semitic, you just don't really think.

  23. Re:A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Belial6 · · Score: 3

    A coworker that was living down the road from the Davidian compound tells me that the Dividians had been legally shooting rifles on their property. A neighbor made a noise complaint and the local sheriff had already been out and worked out a compromise to resolve the complaint. As the story goes, the issue had already been resolved with the kooky but harmless Davidians.

  24. If what you say is true ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just CIA/NSA propaganda. Grocery store celeb news mags for people "afraid". Something "terrible" is gonna happen one day if we don't justify our fucked society.

    If what you say is true, not long from now they will arrest some "terrorists" from China, some other "terrorists" from Cuba, from Russia, and from North Korea will be arrested too, and their "weapon of choice" will be ranging from "portable gamma knife" to "dirty bombs" and everything in between

    Yep, NSA is here to save the United States of America, and they will catch the "terrorists" and parade them in front of all of us to gawk at

  25. Re:Has he thought this through? by yet+another+SanTiago · · Score: 4, Informative

    The inverse-square law only holds for something that radiates in a radial pattern.

    More or less everything radiates in a radial pattern (has spherical wavefron) and is subject to the inverse-square law. Even lasers have some divergence. Better focus (by e.g. reflectors) would give you lower angle of divergence and therefore higher initial power density, but that is all.

    x-rays are of a longer wavelength than visible light,

    Definitely not. X-rays have significantly higher frequency and therefore shorter wavelength (380-740 nm for visible light and 0.01 - 10 nm for x-rays).

  26. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3

    I think you are part of the problem. If we call everything that is harmful to a civil society terrorism, the word loses its meaning.

    However, it has already lost its meaning because white folk are no longer being classed as terrorists. The classic example being Anders Breivik -- when he struck they cried "terrorist". When it turned out he was a white supremacist, the word disappeared.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  27. Re: A conspiracy... proving you wrong by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No, the reason they stopped calling him a terrorist is because they decided they were not going to be terrorized or give him a platform. They didn't want him to be seen as a soldier fighting a war or on some kind of crusaded. They demoted him to a simple criminal, a deranged murder.

    We could learn a lot from that.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC