Slashdot Mirror


Google Avoids Fine Over Street View WiFi Snooping, Ordered To Delete Data

DW100 writes "Google has avoided a fine from the UK's data protection watchdog over its admission that it had failed to delete all Wi-Fi data from its Street View cars last year — but it must ensure it is deleted within 35 days or face a contempt of court action. 'Its investigation into Google reopened last year after further revelations about the data taken from wi-fi networks. During that inquiry, additional discs containing private data were found.Google had previously pledged to destroy all data it had collected, but admitted last year that it had "accidentally" retained the additional discs. ... [The ICO said], "The detriment caused to individuals by this breach fails to meet the level required to issue a monetary penalty."'"

3 of 115 comments (clear)

  1. Re:So unfair by Saethan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hate to break it to you, but lots of people do this. Just go wardriving with a packet analyzer.

  2. Re:Detriment caused by msauve · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it's more like standing naked by your front window, then complaining because someone takes a picture from the street. Setting up minimal WiFi encryption on consumer wireless equipment has never been a task requiring a "capable expert."

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  3. Re:Interesting how many times Google gets away... by mystikkman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here are two other mighty convenient examples where Google made "innocent" mistakes by vacuuming more data to track users intrusively and show them ads. Not sure if they're evil or just incompetent.

    Here's an example of them being *both* very competent and evil.

    Removing borders and decreasing contrast between ads and results to get more clicks and more money from advertisers and users, especially older people who can't see contrast well. I am sure they employ professional psychologists with PhDs whose sole objective is to increase ad clicks by using A/B testing, even if they user didn't intend to click ads, they must be making billions off these "optimizations".

    http://ppcblog.com/fbf0fa-now-you-see-it

    http://blumenthals.com/blog/2012/01/31/is-google-intentionally-trying-to-minimize-the-fact-that-these-are-ads/

    Unlike Microsoft, they do have amazing PR though, with making lots of people believe the all the 'do no evil' BS, while slowly taking over the browser market by beating Mozilla to save money on ads.