Slashdot Mirror


Is Google Voice Doomed To Be 2nd-Class Messaging System?

itwbennett writes "There's a lot to like about Google Voice, including 'voicemail transcriptions, the ability to send and receive unlimited text messages by phone or website, and recording incoming calls,' says Voice convert Kevin Purdy. But when it comes to app integration, Voice is falling short — even on Android phones: 'Most apps that do neat things with incoming texts, like read them out loud when you're driving, can't work with Voice. Tasker, a crazy, nerdy automation tool that can do things like turn your volume up when you get a text from your wife, can't work with Voice.... Online services that text you to verify or remind you are about 50/50.' Google employee Nikhyl Singhal wrote in a Google+ post that 'Hangouts is designed to be the future of Google Voice.' But what Voice users like Purdy are looking for is some sort of 'assurance that Google Voice can work just like any other text messaging system.'"

22 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Saves me from having to buy cheap cellphones by mlts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For Craigslist and other uses for a disposable number where I don't trust the other party, Google Voice is very handy. Just this use alone makes it worth having.

    1. Re:Saves me from having to buy cheap cellphones by garcia · · Score: 2

      This.

      I use it on my LinkedIn profile so that recruiters don't learn my real number but can still get in touch with me easily.

    2. Re:Saves me from having to buy cheap cellphones by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And saves me from having to type back a message on my touchscreen when I'm at my computer, I can use the keyboard.

      "But app integration!!!" That's stupid. Unless the app somehow sprouts a physical keyboard from the phone, all other messaging systems are second class compared to google voice in my book.

  2. Doesn't work outside of US by elh_inny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which means it's still very much a niche product.
    Once it works in Europe, China and India then we can talk about it having any signficant market share.
    Even if every single person in the US switched to Google Voice I think it would still be less users than Skype has already...

    1. Re:Doesn't work outside of US by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and Google has a habit of cutting of niche products on a whim......

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Doesn't work outside of US by Trimaxion · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. If you like Google Voice, don't upgrade to Hangouts yet. I did so a while ago, and admittedly, Hangouts is pretty cool, but it comes with a surprise: it takes away your ability to make outbound GV calls in the GMail interface. Fortunately there was an option to downgrade to the old chat interface.

      Engadget says that the phone calling feature will be returned in Hangouts 'soon'... http://www.engadget.com/2013/05/20/hangouts-upgrade-disables-outbound-google-voice-calls-in-desktop/

    3. Re:Doesn't work outside of US by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Also, without MMS, it doens't really allow me to use it as my main number.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  3. email to SMS gateway is badly needed by jaymz666 · · Score: 2

    Instead of me having to use real SMS for company pages, an email to Google Voice messaging would be a very handy replacement. Instead of being tied to a single device I could get alerts on all my google voice outlets and not worry about SMS overages

  4. Google Voice: Add PER CONTACT calling preference by Kevoco · · Score: 2

    I don't know why GV is not better integrated into my phone. My choices in GV settings are to use GV for ALL calls, NO calls, or PROMPT when calling. If you use PROMPT when calling, you are then asked, on a per call basis, if you wish to make the call with GV or not. But there's no "Remember this choice for this contact" checkbox, and to me it's an incredibly lame oversight. It is for this reason alone that I have GV set to NO calls, and only use GV for received voicemails. I used to use the GV Chrome extension to send text messages, but instead I bought BrowserTexting (a combination of an Android app and Chrome extension) to see and send SMS from my computer.

  5. Google Voice is amazing by slaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Google Voice does a number of things far better than any other system that more than make up for whatever deficiencies the author believes it might have.

    I will preface this by saying that I am a Sprint cellular customer, so Google Voice can be fully integrated into my telephone service.

    1. My cell number is integrated in to Google Voice. This means that I can answer calls from anyplace I happen to be logged in to the desktop version of Gmail or have the Google Voice app installed. This means that I do not need to have my phone tied to my actual person 24 hours a day. I can answer a call while I'm reading on a tablet in my bathtub or while my phone is charging in another room.

    2. Google Voice transcribes voicemails so that they are delivered as E-mails, so that I don't have to listen to them. This is worth actual money to me. I hate voice mail with a passion.

    3. I dislike SMS messages because, again, I don't like having to have my telephone permanently anchored to my body. Google Voice allows me to filter and deliver SMS messages as if they were E-mails and to respond to them as such. SMS messages never hit my phone. I've never opened the SMS app on it. I just respond to e-mails. Again, this is a tremendously valuable service.

    If I'm missing something from not having texts delivered to my phone, I don't know and I don't care what that is, because as far as I'm concerned, Google Voice is doing every single thing I want it to already.

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    1. Re:Google Voice is amazing by pspahn · · Score: 2

      I use GV as my phone number. I haven't paid for cell service in years. One thing I'm going to go ahead and call you out on is the voicemail transcription. Here is an actual transcription that I received last night.

      Hey person, what's up man. It's Meyer. I wanna talk to you about. The way I have been able to. Sir if I don't have your address. I did her phone number so if you could. Gimme a call back as soon as you get a chance if you got the number here pretty soon.

      As you can see, leaves quite a bit to be desired. I can't say it's even improved much in the last couple of years, because it hasn't. Most of the time, the voicemail transcribes as "Unable to transcribe this message".

      While it is definitely a great tool that I use everyday, the voicemail transcription is near useless.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    2. Re:Google Voice is amazing by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's one from my wife (native Californian female):

      Hey, it's me. I just cannot. I about bye bye do hanging in there. Later has hey, if you're gonna you know I love you bye bye.

      Still not so good.

      I don't understand... isn't that just how California girls talk?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Google Voice is amazing by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      my favorite part of google voice is leaving a message for someone who uses it, and they read the transcript as "human-sized mango octopus glovebox get scammed by the hamburglar one sousaphone excoriated in the afterlife," and then they listen to the message to find out what I actually said, and they find out that's actually what I said.

    4. Re:Google Voice is amazing by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here's one from my wife (native Californian female):

      Hey, it's me. I just cannot. I about bye bye do hanging in there. Later has hey, if you're gonna you know I love you bye bye.

      Still not so good.

      I don't understand... isn't that just how California girls talk?

      No. Notice that the word "Totally" wasn't there, nor was "like", nor "to the max".

      "Hey, its me. I, like, just cannot. I'm totally about bye bye, like, do hanging in there. Later has hey, like if you're gonna, you know, I like totally love you to the max. Bye bye".

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  6. Please, not hangout by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hangout is great, I get it. If they REALLY implemented Voice in Hangout I'd be fine if it were just as simple to utilize.

    However, what I don't want is when my Aunt Tilly wants to call me that I say "wait, I don't have a phone number any more - just go to the local library where they have broadband, ask them to install the Google Talk plugin or whatever, and start a hangout with me." Oh, and I'd like it to still ring my home phone, which is just a phone (not a smartphone, not a cell phone - a handset, two pairs of wires, and about $1 in circuitry).

    I love Google Voice because it is a bridge that allows me to interface modern technologies like the web/mobile/etc with basic telephony (SMS, PSTN/etc) which are used by everybody who isn't under the age of 25.

  7. Re:Yes. by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Errr, Betteridge would indicate the answer should be "no.".

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
  8. Re:We Just added WebRTC support to FreeSWITCH by anthm · · Score: 2

    I guess nobody realized that hangouts is migrating to use WebRTC. If so my comment would not be moderated.

  9. Yes, 2nd class, but worthwhile anyway. by eriks · · Score: 2

    I use GV as my "primary" cellphone #. Granted, I don't actually use my "phone" as a phone very often. I pay next to nothing for cell service, since my phone is connected to wifi most of the time. Sipdroid + GV, while probably only about 95% reliable works well enough for me -- I have had issues with texts not getting forwarded properly, though I solved that by having all texts sent to gmail. It's slightly inconvenient to have two "cell" numbers, though most people i know can deal with that. The voicemail transcription is pretty neat, works well enough, and is often hilarious. I'd pay a reasonable yearly fee for GV. It's my impression that GV mostly exists because google is interested in optimizing its voice recognition system. I sometimes "donate" accurate translations of my voicemails.

    I'd pay a reasonable fee for GV, especially if there was an app that properly integrated it with the android dialer (sipdroid is really a hack).

    1. Re:Yes, 2nd class, but worthwhile anyway. by chrisl456 · · Score: 2

      I use Groove IP. It does integrate with the native dialer if you get the paid version ($5). I use it as my only phone number. Works great as long as I have a (stable!) wifi connection.

      --
      -chris
  10. Re:We Just added WebRTC support to FreeSWITCH by Blaskowicz · · Score: 2

    What the fuck is WebRTC? (rethorical question, since I had to google and wikipedia it)
    And if it works, will it be secure or will any random javascript garbage you get by browsing the web be able to listen to what reaches your microphone?
    "Free" voice chat services that are recorded? (if only so the admin can fap at sex chat)

  11. The next Google product to be killed by flarb936 · · Score: 2

    I'm convinced Google Voice is the next Google product on the chopping block. It hasn't been upgraded in years, it's still kind of wonky. I love it, and use it as replacement for iPhone's Visual Voicemail. Plus it's awesome when traveling out of the country. And the ability to filter callers etc. is just basic stuff that should be available to any mobile customer. They have slightly updated the web interface by integrating it into Hangouts with the new GMail--but they also removed the ability to make calls from GMail. It's only a matter of time before Google kills it.

    --
    ralphbarbagallo.com
  12. Summary of Google Voice (on T-mobile Samsung S3) by JustNiz · · Score: 2

    I do use Google Voice on my Samsung S3 however it has its faults. Here's a list of downs and ups:

    1) With GV, The outgoing call log becomes useless as Instead of showing the number you actually dialled, it lists the automatically assigned arbitrary proxy numbers Google Voice uses. These numbers are all over the US (even when placing local calls) so you can't even figure out which state you were calling, let alone which number.

    2) I'm a Brit living in the US and am particualarly bugged by this one: Even though you can make and receive calls internationally, GV won't let you text internationally, so that means you have to use your service's texting so now the text recipient gets to see your real phone number (which negates the main benefit of GV). It also means the Voice app can't be your primary/only text message reader, as it is designed to be.

    3) making calls via GV is occasionally spotty: Sometimes you cant get a connection via GV even when you can natively. Also sometimes calls dont connect properly (e.g. one side can hear but not speak to the other)

    4) If you answer an incoming call too quickly, (i.e. within 1 or 2 rings ) you get this stupid intermediate voice telling you to type 1 on the keypad to confirm you're not an automated answering machine or something. Its the most retarded and frustratingly annoying thing I've ever had to deal with, especially as the Android phone app doesn't bring up a keypad when you answer a call, so now you have to jump through 2 more button presses.

    Its not like its really stopping automated systems wither as they could easily fake that out by either not answering immediately or just also sending a '1' button press when they do.

    5) The notification bar in android tells you when you get an incoming message, but even with voice installed, touching the notification opens the crappy native reader, not the voice one.

    6) BY FAR THE WORST THING is that there is NO WAY to speak to or get any support from Google for any of its services including GV even the charged ones. They have a forum, but Google NEVER respond to anyone on there. A solution to most of my points, especially 4) has been requested many times on the forums by thousands of people, but Google apparently dont even read their own forum.

    Now the good points:

    3) International calling via GV is WAY cheaper per minute than T-Mobile even with their extra $5/month add-on for cheaper international service.

    4) I really like being able to (usually) hide my actual phone number and just give out my GV one. This means I can easily change my actual phone number at any time. Just because of their crappy implementation, its not 100% foolproof though, as detailed above, sometimes giving out your actual number is still unavoidable.