Industrious Dad Finds the Genetic Culprit To His Daughters Mysterious Disease
First time accepted submitter bmahersciwriter writes "Hugh Rienhoff has searched for more than a decade for the cause of a mysterious constellation of clinical features in his daugther Bea: skinny legs, curled fingers and always the specter that she might have a high risk of cardiovascular complications. He even bought second hand lab equipment to prepare some of her genes for sequencing in his basement. Now, he has an answer."
Alas, this kind of origin story is less suited to a superhero, more suited to a supervillain.
Good to see people bucking the trope.
Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
I'm starting to think that in the following decades we will discover and categorize more and more syndromes like this.
With technology becoming cheaper and easier to use, from genetic lab equipment to computers I guess we will discover that various individuals diverge from the otherwise "normal" genetic make-up.
We might find the tolerance for faults in the genetic mechanism is higher than previously thought and features such as big eyes, long fingers,big hips, small breasts etc will start to be pinpointed to a single gene, protein or step malfunctioning and producing (semi)benign traits.
The line between benign and malign variance will be very blurry.
Curiously yours, crip.
Who happens to be a biotech entrepreneur...
it's like saying
charismatic dad leads hundreds of millions, when writing about obama.. let's not leave out key pieces of information here.
TFA may be filled with references to genetic sequencing and names of various names of genetic-mutations, such as "TGF-B" (sorry, /. can not display "beta")
But at the base of it all, it was the love of the father for his daughter that led to the tireless search for answer, for almost a decade
It's heartwarming, to say the least
Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
Why don't they give Father of the Year awards to people like this? instead of:
So it’s fitting that retired defence chief Angus Houston today joined the ranks of famous Aussie dads like TV personality David Koch, sportsman Steve Waugh, politician and illegal invader of iraq leaving thousands of kids fatherless former PM John Howard to be named as 2011’s Father of the Year and tv personality Steve Vizard.
Summary: "Hugh Rienhoff has searched for more than a decade..."
Story: "Hugh Rienhoff says that his nine-year-old daughter, Bea, is..."
So he's searched for more than a decade for an answer to questions about the medical conditions of his nine-year-old, hmm? Well done, folks.
I remember first reading about this guy, his daughter, and his DIY genomics in Make and Wired magazines back in 2009. I'm glad to see that, several years on, they at least have a likely culprit identified. It's still a long ways from describing the actual mechanism, effects, and potential treatments, but you have to start somewhere. I am also pleased to see that he has been able to get collaborators in industry and academia, who can put greater resources to it than just his own.
"A collaborator of Rienhoff is now engineering a mouse that shares Bea’s gene variant"
That sounds far beyond the capabilities of our current technology. How the heck would they do that?
Genome editing has gotten a lot better; here is a recent example, but I'm sure this isn't the only way to do it. Of course deliberately generating mutant mice is one thing; genetically manipulating live humans to make them healthy is much more difficult. (Hint: there's a lot of attrition in these mouse studies!)
Searching for "fluoride and elvis" leads to 2,500,000+ web pages, so I'd be much more worried about fluoridated water driving me to wear jumpsuits than about birth defects.
searching for vaccines and autism turns up a lot of hits too. Despite being debunked multiple times.
Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
This has been possible for decades. Short and simplified answer to "how":
1. Put the gene of interest (e.g., Bea's variant) into mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) in place of the "normal" (wild type) allele.*
2. Make a female mouse super-ovulate and harvest eggs.
3. Transfer nucleus of engineered mESCs into denucleated eggs.
4. Allow re-nucleated eggs to undergo initial cleavage events in vitro. (These are effectively clones, but with one genetic change.)
5. Take best developing clones and implant into pseudo-pregnant female, ala IVF.
6. Profit!
*In the case of a knock-in (adding or replacing a gene), you need to use vectors that will insert in place of an existing "normal" gene, "knocking in" a mutant or variant. In the case of a knock out, you can either make a copy that doesn't transcribe into mRNA or just use the flanking DNA sequences without the gene you want to remove.