Slashdot Mirror


Clinkle Wants To Become Your Wallet

vikingpower writes "Clinkle, a new mobile payments start-up, may or may not have succeeded where so many other efforts have fizzled by inventing a practical way to replace credit cards with smartphones. It's hard to say, though, since Clinkle won't say much about how its system works. Its website is, well ... slight. But a prominent group of Silicon Valley investors who do know what Clinkle is cooking up are acting as though it has achieved a breakthrough. On Thursday, Clinkle announced that it had raised $25 million in early financing from Accel Partners; Andreessen Horowitz; Intel; Intuit; Marc Benioff, the chief executive of Salesforce.com; Peter Thiel, the co-founder of PayPal; and a long list of other investors with technology industry pedigrees. The Huffington Post has an article on Clinkle, or rather on Stanford students putting their degree on hold to go work at Clinkle. The Wall Street Journal [paywalled] mentions Clinkle having some 30-odd employees already."

27 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Easter Egg by Skiboy941 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hmm. It makes a tinkling bells noise when you put in the Konami Code.

    1. Re:Easter Egg by HairyNevus · · Score: 2

      You must work for these people, right? I mean is it standard operating procedure to do stuff like that at every new website? What else have I missed?

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
  2. Direct Withdrawal by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Creates a direct connection between your wallet and our bank account."

    1. Re:Direct Withdrawal by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so you can out of your funds for the time it takes to fix an error.

      also hackers will love this.

    2. Re:Direct Withdrawal by Mike+Frett · · Score: 2

      Sometimes I wonder if they intentionally make this type of Tech just so Hackers can take advantage; and the company can get free advertisement. You know what they say, even bad advertisement is good advertisement. The sad part is people will buy this, just as sure as people building houses on unstable cliffs.

  3. But I just got in to Simple! by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 2

    Seriously, after applying for an invite a long time ago, I finally got into Simple and started using it, and it really seems to be what banking should be with a great web/phone app. Now I have to sign up and wait for ANOTHER service that is going to replace my bank? - HEX

    1. Re:But I just got in to Simple! by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem here as I see it is that too many companies are fighting for this space, using illegal tactics.

      For instance, even though my phone is capable of using Google Wallet, it won't work on the device because AT&T somehow gets a veto over using the app on my phone. Its all just data, encrypted and secured data, so why do carriers get to block this app? How is that not illegal restraint of trade?

      I don't expect it to be any different with Clinkle. Too many players standing in the way.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:But I just got in to Simple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For instance, even though my phone is capable of using Google Wallet, it won't work on the device because AT&T somehow gets a veto over using the app on my phone. Its all just data, encrypted and secured data, so why do carriers get to block this app? How is that not illegal restraint of trade?

      In the early 1980's, major players in the American banking system invested heavily in the phone system. It was the reason the banks didn't replace the easily duplicated magnetic stripe card with the better security offered by the chip and pin process implemented in Europe at that time (which sadly was 40 years ago). We became a back water country with this technology do to corporate priorities. I see a reason for the problem you described if those type of investment relationships still exists today between the telcos and financial institutions.

    3. Re:But I just got in to Simple! by lxs · · Score: 2

      The grass always does seem greener doesn't it? In reality here in Europe and chip and pin has only been implemented for a decade or so and in most countries paying with the magnetic stripe has only been retired about a year ago.

  4. Do not want by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    No room for a condom.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  5. 30-odd employees by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Wall Street Journal mentions Clinkle having some 30-odd employees already.

    But how many normal employees do they have?

    And why exactly would I want a product where I have to provide my own terminal to run their code and use my own capped data to support their service? Can't imagine any benefit to the actual consumer over just using my plastic card.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  6. Nice Idea by RedHackTea · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if done right. You go to restaurant. Get receipt. Create a one-off closed account with user ID and one-off GUID with exactly the amount of receipt+tip transferred from your actual bank account. Unlike with a card, you just hand the server the user ID+GUID. They never know your full name and credit card number. They can't swap your card with an imposter (plenty of cases where servers will do this if have a similar looking card). If they do decide malicious intent or accidentally mix up your GUID with another, then there is no problem; all that is in the temporary "account" is the exact money. The only thing that will tie them to your accounts is the user ID, and that will not be your direct online banking account, etc.; it will be the (Clinkle's) service. This is just a pipe dream of course, and I'm sure Clinkle's service is more open so that restaurants/etc. don't have to buy new hardware/software; it's probably only a fraction safer than actually giving your plastic card.

    --
    The G
    1. Re:Nice Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would only start to be comfortable with this if they licensed their software to banks and let banks keep the records.

      The scenario you describe has a gaping privacy hole in that Clinkle will have records of all your purchases. One national security letter or weakly anonymized marketing datbase sale later, and you're screwed.

      Banks, at least, already have this information, so we're no worse off; and, banking as a whole is more strongly regulated than valley startups.

    2. Re:Nice Idea by tftp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You go to restaurant. Get receipt. Create a one-off closed account with user ID and one-off GUID with exactly the amount of receipt+tip transferred from your actual bank account. Unlike with a card, you just hand the server the user ID+GUID. They never know your full name and credit card number.

      Or, if you are not one of those thirty "odd employees," you just pay with cash. Or you use a temporary c/c number with limited funds - many banks offer this service for free. Or you walk with the server to the payment terminal. There are several ways to pay that do not involve a third party.

      This whole thing is designed to appeal to geeks who enjoy fiddling with computers. However everyone else will find it bothersome. It is just another step where you can make a mistake. All those eWallet companies are solving a problem that does not exist for the vast majority of people - and even to some geeks. I, personally, have no need of that service. I also have no desire to include another set of crooks into the payment chain.

      I'm sure Clinkle's service is more open so that restaurants/etc. don't have to buy new hardware/software; it's probably only a fraction safer than actually giving your plastic card.

      Where would these numbers go that a patron hands over to the server? Do they just type it into a browser, in a place where thousands of patrons and workers come and go every single day? It only takes a record in the HOSTS file, and a self-signed certificate, to impersonate the service. Businesses pay for secure terminals because they are secure. A mere computer in a corner cannot be called secure, if all it takes to compromise is to insert a USB stick and run a script.

  7. Alternatively... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what else works just as well as a credit card that is way smaller and lighter than a cell phone, never needs recharging, works literally everywhere and already has proven, well-established limited liability for theft? A fucking credit card.

    Oh, and nice analysis editor:

    Clinkle, a new mobile payments start-up, may or may not have succeeded ...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  8. The problem with credit cards is... by bradley13 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...they are bloody expensive! The consumer doesn't see most of this, but the merchants pay through the nose. A typical small business will pay around 3% of the total transaction to the credit card company, plus additional fees for payment processing, plus additional fees for certifications, plus...there's always another damned fee.

    That could well represent the entire profit margin of a smaller business. Guess what, that means those costs are added into the price. Since most credit card contracts (at least in my country) explicitly prohibit giving a "cash discount" or anything else that would be to the disadvantage of credit card purchases, this means that there is no way out: everyone must pay the higher prices.

    It's quite a racket, if you think about it: 3% of the top of a huge chunk of all consumer transactions. I dream of seeing some real competition in the payment processing market.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:The problem with credit cards is... by tftp · · Score: 3

      It's quite a racket, if you think about it: 3% of the top of a huge chunk of all consumer transactions.

      How much are you spending on your c/c per year? Let's say $20K. This is a large sum of money, fit for a family guy with several children. (I don't spend that much.) 2% of that (often you get 1% back) would be $400.

      Would you agree to carry, count and spend $20K in cash over the year if I promise to pay you $400? You will be in danger of losing the money, of being robbed, of miscounting not in your favor, and of not having enough cash on hand. Cash is dirty, having been in hands of lowest castes of the society, and it may carry diseases. Most of US cash carries traces of drugs, and that can attract attention of police dogs; the police will then be happy to tear your car apart.

      The banks may be charging too much for the service; but from the POV of the consumer, the convenience is worth the cost. Is it a nice racket for the banks? Probably yes, it is. They inserted themselves into the payment chain, and it's all but impossible to extract them out of there.

      The many eWallet providers (that always come and go) are not aiming for saving the world from the onerous 3%. They are aiming to collect those 3%. The world will be still paying the payment tax, one way or another. Those companies are not saviors; they are just the new generation of thieves who are trying to replace the prededing generation of thieves.

    2. Re:The problem with credit cards is... by tftp · · Score: 2

      Reportedly, miners are already configuring their systems to drop transactions that do not bring revenue. Days of BTC mining just for fun, done by a few nerds and a computer, are gone. Today you need to have an ASIC miner to keep up - and as soon as the network becomes faster, the difficulty level goes up, and the number of still available bitcoins continues to drop. Why would a miner mine anything say, ten years from now, when he needs a quantum computer (at a mere $10M price tag) to even get started? The mined bitcoins, which will be coming at a rate of one per year, will not be a very good enticement. If a miner is in business, he wouldn't be donating his computer's time to freeloaders. I already have a small amount in BTC that I cannot transfer to another account because it requires a fee that is larger than the amount! Combine with the deflation of BTC, and your "small transaction fee" is quickly growing into a tax that is worse than these 3% of Visa.

      Other poster already mentioned that BTC suffers from several problems. Here is one, for example. You come to the store and pay a small amount of BTC. You then stand there for ten minutes and wait for six confirmations. They are not coming. The store owner is getting nervous, if not aggressive. He suggests that you put the goods down and leave, or else he will call the cops. What are your options?

      Those confirmations may be genuinely delayed, or you may have mistyped his account number, or it may be a ruse by the store owner. Why not - the software is not secure, and anyone can hack it in any way they want, to say whatever they want. If you have a block explorer on your smartphone and you know what it is, you can prove (? a web service proving that A paid B? Not even funny.) that the transaction went through. But for majority of people this is not just over their head, it's in another galaxy. That's why people use banks and cash - because there is an independent arbiter of all transactions. Cash can be checked for validity simply enough, and bank transactions are all logged and cross-referenced, so that none are lost.

    3. Re:The problem with credit cards is... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cash is dirty, having been in hands of lowest castes of the society, and it may carry diseases.

      What the fuck? Did you just actually say that? What sort of bullshit is this? Are you a time traveler from India circa 1840, or are you just a ignorant, bigoted prick?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  9. Go to Hell, Clinkle by nukenerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I followed the link to their website and the first thing up is their demand my email address. WTF? I cannot just browse their site without them demanding my email?

    Next thing, they demand I upgrade my browser. That's my business; it's their business to design their website to use HTML standards.

    Do these jerks seriously expect people to sign on after a start like that?

    1. Re:Go to Hell, Clinkle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I cannot just browse their site without them demanding my email?

      The catch is they don't even have a web site yet. Just a steadily growing mailing list that they'll send out progress reports to until they get a working product. Why on earth anyone would ever sign up for one, I have no idea. But that's what it is.

      Next thing, they demand I upgrade my browser. That's my business; it's their business to design their website to use HTML standards.

      It's part of the Silicon Valley startup douchebag mindset. They're innovators. They're moving forward. They are progress. They don't want to be tied down to legacy modes and archaic systems. In other words, they have no concept of graceful fallback and only design for their friends using whatever-the-fuck-Google-calls-Chrome-beta-these-days.

      Do these jerks seriously expect people to sign on after a start like that?

      Some of them probably do, but they really don't care. All they need is something to show a VC (who is, of course, running Chrome beta on a macbook pro), so that the VC thinks "Hey, some hypothetical people somewhere might find that really cool!". Then they need to say that a shitload of people signed up to hear about updates and present it on a nice hockey stick graph. Then they sit around writing blog posts, attending seminars, having lunch with other forward-thinking, progressive innovators while one of those starry eyed college students code monkeys up a prototype in jQuery cobbled together from bits of Stack Overflow. The idea is that sometime before the other shoe drops they'll be able to sell themselves to Yahoo! or Google (who have to buy out of fear that they've actually built something), rinse and repeat.

  10. Single company solution? by mars-nl · · Score: 2

    I don't think I ever want a payment system to be in the hands of one single company. In the Netherlands (Europe even) all banks adopted the same standard for electronic debit payments and this works fine. Credit cards are basically in the hands of two companies, MasterCard and Visa, and this sucks because they behave as monopolists.

    IMHO an electronic payment system can only starts as a co-operation between many banks/governments or... bottom up, with some open specification invented by people like you.

  11. re Already done by jelizondo · · Score: 2

    Sorry for the link in Spanish, but one of the banks I use in Mexico already offers an option to pay using my celular instead of my debit/credit card. (Clic on Pago Movil)

    I can go to many stores (20,000 according to the bank) and simply clic on an app and the bill is settled electronically.

    Another example is token authentication, which is used by all banks for Internet banking in Mexico but is rare (o was until about a year ago) in the US.

    Why are U.S. banks so backward?

    --
    Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
  12. A solution in search of a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Server comes to my table with a wireless credit card machine, swipes it in front of me and hands me back my card. I review the amount and scribble a signature.
    Easy as can be

    Many places don't even require the signature any longer

    My bank handles any fraudulent charges on my behalf, no risk to me

    Contrast that to other payment systems, like PayPal, where your money is taken by PayPal and not returned for 6 months. Or a fraudulent use requires jumping through multiple hoops to try to get your money back. Ever try to close an account at PayPal? Sorry, we've "permanently limited your account" so you aren't allowed to EVER close it.

    I'll stick with credit cards, they work great, earn rewards and are cheap and simple to use.

  13. why? by cas2000 · · Score: 2

    why would anyone want to replace their credit card with their mobile phone, anyway?

    what problem does it solve? what benefit does it give?

    there are numerous security and privacy reasons why this is a bad idea but I can't think of even one reason why anyone would want it, or why it might be a good - or even useful - idea.

  14. Heard this song before by MountainLogic · · Score: 2
    But a prominent group of Silicon Valley investors who do know what Clinkle is cooking up are acting as though it has achieved a breakthrough.

    Was this the brain trust that told us breathlessly that "Ginger" was going to redefine civilization?

  15. Is there a problem? by wakeboarder · · Score: 2

    Why does my wallet need replacing? It does everything I need it to, and more importantly, it allows me to control my money via more physical means. I'm fine with swiping cards. Cash is fine too. The best part about it is I don't have to give my info to another third party who is going to find ways to take my money.