Slashdot Mirror


French Gov't Runs Vast Electronic Spying Operation of Its Own

Freshly Exhumed writes with this news (quoting The Guardian): "France runs a vast electronic surveillance operation, intercepting and stocking data from citizens' phone and internet activity, using similar methods to the U.S. National Security Agency's Prism programme exposed by Edward Snowden, Le Monde has reported. An investigation by the French daily [en français; Google translation] found that the DGSE, France's external intelligence agency, had spied on the French public's phone calls, emails and internet activity. The agency intercepted signals from computers and phones in France as well as between France and other countries, looking not so much at content but to create a map of 'who is talking to whom,' the paper said."

32 of 214 comments (clear)

  1. Now taking bets... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now taking bets on which country will be implicated next in sketchy and/or illegal domestic monitoring.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    1. Re:Now taking bets... by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As long as they do not look into the content of our emails/phone calls, we couldn't care less if they check 'who is talking to whom'.

      That's presumably why you're posting anonymously.

    2. Re:Now taking bets... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > we couldn't care less if they check 'who is talking to whom'.
      > we
      I think you meant "I".

      Are you 100% sure you know what the people you call do in their free time?

      You might be calling a terrorist/pedophile/drug dealer without knowing it.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Now taking bets... by geoskd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't care if they see I'm talking to a divorce lawyer or AIDS doctor. Really, the whole world can see this. The websites I visit ? Public knowledge and in no way shameful or compromising. My friends ? All of them ordinary, upstanding guys with no political interests or inclination for subversive activities. It's not like I'm one of those Muslims who are all at 5 degrees of separation to a known terrorist. My day to day location and CCTV images ? Public. My full financial data ? No problem there, I'm 100% free of any tax related problem - I have the tax code memorized (all it's 14K pages). I have nothing to hide !

      I have some bad news for you, you are almost certainly within 5 degrees of separation from some "person of interest". Pretty much everyone is. Otherwise why would they have to gather data on everyone.

      The problem isn't that this particular set of collected data is or isn't a danger to all of our freedoms. The problem isn't whether or not there is proper oversight for the people conducting the spying. The problem is that this amount of power will inherently lead to corruptions and abuses, and as such, no government can be trusted with it. The very fact that the government felt the need to conduct this spying in secret is ample evidence that their intentions are not on the up and up. If you tell everyone that you are monitoring who they communicate with, then the paranoid people will act to prevent the eavesdropping, but their behavior alone will single them out, giving the would-be-eavesdroppers just as much useful intelligence as having all of that metadata. The idea that the spying has to be secret to be effective is absurd in practice. Since the given reason for the secrecy is false, the only remaining explanations are far more sinister. We now hear that the french are partaking of this level of spying? Is foreign terrorism that big of a threat in France? I suspect that the biggest terrorist threat in France is the same as the US: good old fashioned homegrown whackjobs. No amount of communication surveillance is going to help find and catch the lone bomber, or the dedicated pair of crazies. There are only two uses for that level of survailance: Post-incident investigation (they already admitted that no one looks at the data in real time). And oppression. Just because it makes the investigators jobs easier for the first option doesn't mean its worth risking the second option.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    4. Re:Now taking bets... by richlv · · Score: 3, Insightful

      woosh ? :)

      --
      Rich
    5. Re:Now taking bets... by St.Creed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But the current thread is about the naivete and self delusion necessary to assume that the entire content of letters, email, voice calls, etc is NOT recorded or even scanned, and ONLY metadata is recorded. There isn't shred of evidence to support this view and Snowden and others have specifically stated that it is not so.

      True. However, for most purposes they really only want to know who's talking to who. In most cases, drone-strikes can commence based on just that data. Google "Karen Stephenson" and "The Quantum Theory of Trust" to see why all the agencies are on top of this.

      Also relevant: "I'm looking for needles in haystacks. So I'm gathering haystacks." - Dutch Intelligence Chief. I guess this would explain their modus operandi as far as the "gathering of data" goes.

      The Germans did it first though, with their "Schleppnetzfahndung" (dragnet investigations), in the 1970's. It lead to a lot of innocent people losing their jobs and livelihood due to being suspected of sympathizing with terrorism. I don't need a crystal ball to predict how this round will end, if the crisis continues and people start organizing to put pressure on their local rulers. The gloves *will* come off in that case.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    6. Re:Now taking bets... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      I have nothing to hide !

      says the AC....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    7. Re:Now taking bets... by meta-monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but when we do it, it's not spying, it's Freedom Listening.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    8. Re:Now taking bets... by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      No that's not the problem. Spying on your citizens is fine.

      Speak for yourself. 1984 was never intended to be an instruction manual. Is that really the kind of society you want to live in? Your every communication monitored like you are some kind of lab animal?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    9. Re:Now taking bets... by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      You are very, very naive. NSA IS a core part of government and they have a "intelligence" shitpile on EVERY American by now. They decided Obama's shitpile was smelling better than Romney's.

      The NSA were just following orders. All the programs you are so scared of now were put in place during a Republican mandate and are only scaled up versions of what they have been doing for decades. I can only speculate why they were allowed to continue.

      Complaining that a lawful government agency was following orders and fulfilling a mandate related to national security is naive.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    10. Re:Now taking bets... by Camael · · Score: 2

      I have nothing to hide !

      ...says the person posting as Anon C. Well played troll, well played.

  2. See!!? by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Everyone is doing it. It must be ok then... so move along, "don't rock the boat - keep your head down Just another fool in the crowd"...

    /sarcasm

  3. Oh for the love of fuck... by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been known publicly since the release of the book the Sword and the Shield in the 1990s, and well-known by most larger companies since well before that even. We're persecuting Snowden for being the Captain Obvious of the intelligence community. "Oh noes! The french are spying on us!" Dude. Fucking duh. The french have been spying on everyone since the dark ages. Hell, where do you think the word sabateur comes from? The french pretty much invented industrial espionage.

    In other news... why are we threatening the lives of other countries leaders and going on a mad witch hunt for Snowden, wheeling and dealing in backroom deals reminiscent of the cold war era again? Oh right... because he came forward and confirmed what everyone either already suspected, or knew. Which was only necessary because so many people are living in a level of denial that makes the comment "Windows 8 is the best operating system ever!" look like criticism. -_-

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Oh for the love of fuck... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Saboteur" refers to the practice of ruining the innards of weaving machines by throwing in your shoes - a type of wooden clog called a "sabot". It has no espionage connotations at all.

      And it probably originates in the Netherlands.

    2. Re:Oh for the love of fuck... by caluml · · Score: 2

      The word saboteur is French, I think.

    3. Re:Oh for the love of fuck... by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 2

      Ever heard about semantic drift? http://fr.wiktionary.org/wiki/saboter#Verbe.C2.A01

      No, you cannot disagree. I'm a native speaker, as well as a language graduate.

      --
      "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
    4. Re:Oh for the love of fuck... by Bradmont · · Score: 2

      Interestingly, the word "espionage" actually *does* come from the French "espion," for spy, and "espionage," for spying.

    5. Re:Oh for the love of fuck... by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

      I'm stunned everyone doesn't know this story.

      In the early 19th century, before mechanical looms got big, many thousands of people made clothe in their homes, and made a decent wage as skilled workers. Then industrialization happened, Mechanical Looms put almost everyone out of business, and everyone else was making starvation wages so the loom-owners could afford gold-plated carriages.

      So some of them took to invading factories and destroying the Looms with their clogs. In French a clog is a "sabot," so this was called "sabotage."

  4. It's understandable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    France does have a huge population of immigrants from N. Africa who after escaping their oppressive Third World shitholes, riot and protest in France because they don't like the society they live in or some such non-sense.

    It's the same formula - leave oppressive fundamentalist Islamic society for a Western one and then riot because your new country doesn't have oppressive Islamic laws.

    And they wonder why they're prejudiced against.

    1. Re:It's understandable. by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 5, Informative

      France does have some pretty hardcore racists, the National Front party is quite popular. The rioters however are usually second or third generation who complain they aren't being given equal opportunities in employment or education. How true this is I don't know, but having lived in France for quite a while I'd say it's entirely possible.

    2. Re:It's understandable. by NicBenjamin · · Score: 3

      From what I've seen France really sucks at integrating immigrants. the only French pol I can name with non-French ancestry would be Sarkozy, and Sarko's family has been in the country for roughly a century.

      In the US he'd be an old-line blueblood. In France the National Front thought he was un-French.

      Europe as a whole seems to suck at integrating immigrants. Which is unfortunate, because basically the entire point of the EU is to allow random Romanians to get jobs in London.

  5. Yes and no by silviuc · · Score: 5, Informative

    Al EU nations have to abide by an EU directive that requires telecom companies and internet service providers to record and store the meta-data.

    Read this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Retention_Directive

    The article is worded such that I don't yet understand whether the data was stocked for years (because the directive does impose time limits) or if the program has been going for years which is accurate since the directive was issued in 2006.

  6. France banned crypto for years by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, duh. Of course they do - this is France, the country that made cryptography illegal until it was pointed out to them that this was destroying their ability to participate in electronic commerce.

    1. Re:France banned crypto for years by BioTitan · · Score: 2

      Now I think of it, a lot of countries banned crypto. Remember when all the different countries were banning Blackberries because they couldn't tap them?

  7. iNSAption by knotprawn · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is not unexpected, but each revelation just makes the whole situation seem more and more hilarious. The following scenario is probably playing itself out somewhere right now.

    NSA Agent 1: "Sir, we've intercepted a French transmission that I think you should take a look at"

    NSA Agent 2: "Why, what does it say?"

    (Transcript of translated Transmission reads) "Sir, we've intercepted an American transmission that I think you should take a look at"

  8. English Version from Le Monde by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's their own English Translation, just the graphics are only in the french version.

    http://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2013/07/04/revelations-on-the-french-big-brother_3442665_3224.html

  9. So much for the idea that the US is uniquely evil by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    Looks to me like all the major western democracies are engaging in this sort of thing.

    The original article seems to indicate that this is actually illegal in France. Interesting. At least they could have passed a secret law and set up a secret court to make it appear better.

    Who next to be exposed? Germany? Surely with the all those ex-Ministerium fur Staatssicherheit employees to draw from it would have been easy.

  10. This is not news by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Long before the Chinese were the country in the hotseat for spying, France and Israel were already established professionals in the industrial espionage arena.

    Before traveling overseas in the late 80s and early 90s we got lectures about how the French probably had bugs and cameras in our hotel rooms and that they routinely spied on visitors.

    Just like the NSA spying shouldn't have been news, but most people act surprised. Seriously, what's the next headline we're going to wake up to? That the Koch family has been funding a vast propaganda network to influence public opinion? That the Chinese have stolen the design of every nuclear warhead in our arsenal? That Pakistan is giving safe harbor to terrorists? Or the FBI was been tipped off and missed both 9/11 and the Boston Marathon bombers?

    It's like living in Groundhog Day.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  11. Re:So much for the idea that the US is uniquely ev by NicBenjamin · · Score: 2

    Keep in mind that if they're reporting on this they're likely privacy advocates, and privacy advocates tend to have a much more expansive view of what is private then the Courts do.

    For example state-side you have the right to not talk to the police, but refusing to talk to police can be considered probable cause to get a warrant. It can also be used as evidence against you during your trial. Every privacy advocate hates this, and when the Supremes recently confirmed it there were terrabytes of counter-arguments on the internet; but that didn't change the law.

  12. the timing is suspicious by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

    I figure there are a few possibilities. The first, and the one that I favor, is that the CIA or NSA is ultimately responsible for this leak about France. If there's one thing the US needs right now it is to spread the blame. To show that other people are doing the same. To some people that will seem like a valid defense.

    A second possibility is that Snowden, despite his predicament, inspired a French agent to do the same, except anonymously. I find this only slightly less probable than the first possibility.

    And finally there is the possibility that the timing is a complete coincidence. I think it's more likely that the moon is made of cheese, but I suppose it is not impossible.

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  13. Casablanca anyone? by Alimony+Pakhdan · · Score: 2

    If ever there was a perfect chance to use the "I'm shocked, SHOCKED" meme, it would be here.

  14. Nuremberg Principle IV by Camael · · Score: 2

    I refer you to the Nuremberg Principle IV

    Principle IV states: "The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him".

    This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'".

    There is always a choice not to follow. One could take the courageous example of acting attorney general James Comey, FBI director Robert Mueller and others in the Bush era :-

    Nine years ago, top officials in the Justice Department and FBI threatened to resign over then-President George W. Bush's sweeping domestic surveillance policy, which they believed to be illegal. As the Washington Post reports, acting attorney general James Comey, FBI director Robert Mueller, and top leadership in the Justice Department began drafting resignation letters in March of 2004, after the National Security Agency (NSA), at Bush's direction, began collecting metadata on emails and Skype calls sent and placed within the US.

    Comey and Goldsmith found the NSA's argument tenuous, and threatened to resign over it. Bush at first pushed forward with the program, even after Comey ordered a halt to it, but ultimately reversed course after Mueller threatened to resign.