Slashdot Mirror


DEF CON Advises Feds Not To Attend Conference

tsu doh nimh writes "One of the more time-honored traditions at DEF CON — the massive hacker convention held each year in Las Vegas — is 'Spot-the-Fed,' a playful and mostly harmless contest to out undercover government agents that attend the show each year. But that game might be a bit tougher when the conference rolls around again next month: In an apparent reaction to recent revelations about far-reaching U.S. government surveillance programs, DEF CON organizers are asking feds to just stay away: 'I think it would be best for everyone involved if the feds call a "time-out" and not attend DEF CON this year,' conference organizer Jeff Moss wrote in a short post at Defcon.org. Krebsonsecurity writes that after many years of mutual distrust, the hacker community and the feds buried a lot of their differences in the wake of 911, with the director of NSA even delivering the keynote at last year's conference. But this year? Spot the fed may just turn into hack-the-fed."

29 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Uncomfortable Relationship by techsoldaten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have never really been comfortable with having the Feds in there in the first place. Anyone in government can potentially serve in a prosecutorial role, and the government has demonstrated over the years they are perfectly willing to demonize hackers if it serves a need. Thinking about Mitnick, Gonzales, and a bunch of other guys who got railroaded here, along with 2600 meetings where we would get interrogated just for showing up to have coffee.

    It's a little like inviting the fox into the henhouse to have these guys around. Pretending that they care about the hacker community is a little hard for me to do.

    1. Re:Uncomfortable Relationship by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretending that they care about the community is a little hard for me to do.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Uncomfortable Relationship by davydagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      who are these hackers, nerds like you, are home grown suits, drawn from the typical agent pool.

      No, its people like us they recruit. Of those 5,000, I can guaruntee that at least 4,000 were the type that would attend DEFCON, BEFORE, they starting working for the feds. Their good people are us. All institutions and movements survive by recruiting. The Feds have good people because people like us decide to work for them. They really need to remember that.

      No, WE really need to remember that. Then remember how we get treated by society, the press, the legal system, etc...

      Then think how well they get treated.

    3. Re: Uncomfortable Relationship by Dereck1701 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "You can, of course, be arrested for anything at any time. However, you will not be convicted of"

      Thats why being arrested in and of itself is being used as a form of punishment these days. If arrested you're held for the full period allowed by law (72 hours I believe in most areas, there are of course always attempts to extend this limit) and in most cases never charged. You have your fingerprints, image and now even your DNA taken as evidence to be used against you in the future. If you want proof you don't have to look far, during the OWS protests thousands were arrested, I doubt 15% of them were charged. In NYC even those cases where they did try to charge the protestors the cases were thrown out left and right, due to lack of any evidence, evidence (video) proving the charges were bogus, case after case where the arresting officer "couldn't"/wouldn't come to court and even a case where the police write up of the "criminal activity" wasn't a crime(the officer claimed that by dressing up like a pixie she was "impeding traffic").

  2. Wrong way to go about it? by kennethmci · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I imagine after being asked NOT to attend, they will be FAR more interested in attending.

    1. Re:Wrong way to go about it? by ciderbrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think being asked not to attend will stop them.
      This time they should know are not welcome and more importantly why.

    2. Re:Wrong way to go about it? by jythie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am kinda curious if they can enforce it in a legal way. 'hack the fed' would be one thing, but it would be terribly amusing to see security escorting federal agents out of the building. It is a private convention and they are free to prohibit anyone they like.

    3. Re:Wrong way to go about it? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obvious joke: gross incompetence and Federal agents, those things don't overlap often.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    4. Re:Wrong way to go about it? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, you only need to be 51% sure. ;)

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    5. Re:Wrong way to go about it? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Engage in massive, illegal surveillance then hold a secret court to decide their "guilty".

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  3. Re:MIBs by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can't use that to recognize the feds. All hackers wear black. And sunglasses the whole day long.

    However, feds burn. And why do feds burn? ... Because they're made of wood.
    How to know if one's made of wood? ... Because it floats.
    And what also floats? ... A duck!
    So, if the guy weights like a duck, he's a fed!

  4. Re:MIBs by C0R1D4N · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am guessing they are generally physically fit with short cut hair.

  5. Re:And what will happen if they do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because you "know" you'll get beaten when walking around in a Ku Klux robe in Queens, New York at night (which is perfectly legal afaict), this doesn't mean beating you up is allowed, and that it isn't a crime that should be prosecuted.

  6. Re:Defcon is a freakshow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    hah I remember being at defcon in 2002 and some crew from Japan public radio or something started interviewing me, went something like this:

    interviewer: Why did you come to DefCon?

    me: I'm totally here to hang with my friends and party.

    interviewer: You didn't come here to share information?

    me: d00d, we do that every day, it's called the In-ter-net.

  7. Can they extend to non-invitation? by c0lo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please... would DEFCON organizers be so kind to ask the spooks to stay out not only of the conference but out of the entire citizens life? Thanks.

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  8. Not the Feds you should worry about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Feds who show up and identify themselves as Feds aren't the Feds you need to worry about anyway.

    1. Re:Not the Feds you should worry about by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Feds who show up and identify themselves as Feds aren't the Feds you need to worry about anyway.

      While saying that those weren't the feds we need to worry about... Did you wave a hand?

  9. When you dance with the Devil, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When you dance with the Devil, the Devil doesn't change - you do.

    Look up Smedley Butler. He joined for patriotism, he was decorated for bravery and then he was used to murder civilians for agribusiness. Here we are a century later and the game is the same. Young men join for patriotism and end up murdering civilians for the profits of the 1%

  10. Re:Recycling an outworn meme by mdragan · · Score: 5, Funny

    He is clearly well fed, but considering going hungary, or maybe Venezuela.

  11. Re:And what will happen if they do by Dins · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I've Spotted a Fed. Do I win something?

  12. Insufficiently paranoid, actually by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you think the Feds you knew were there were the only Feds there, you're an idiot.

    Personally, were I an FBI wonk, I'd have long-ago made penetrating DEFCON a priority on so many levels and so long ago that I'd have deep-penetration spooks in the leadership today, guiding policy. That's practically Machiavelli 101.

    Hell, I'd have even doubled-up, and sent honeypot Feds to BE hacked/cracked/busted, so the Defcon kids would feel like they were winning, ala:
    http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8581/4puc.jpg

    (SFW aside from PG13 language).

    --
    -Styopa
  13. semantics by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does "Fed" include all the people in that room who are contractors for various federal agencies?

    Does anyone believe that being once removed by virtue of a private company makes you any less part of the police state?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  14. Re:And what will happen if they do by Vintermann · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are they? Do you actually have any inside knowledge of the NSA and what they do

    No of course not. That's the problem.

    You could use the exact same defense for the Stasi. East Germans had no nice and official documentation about what they did, unless they worked for them. Were they therefore not entitled to have an opinion about it?

    Most of them are probably doing harmless innocuous work, or actually tracing workable intelligence leads towards the bad guys.

    Are they? Do you actually have any inside knowledge of the NSA and what they do?

    Beleive it or not the intelligence community does serve a useful purpose

    I'm not convinced. I've not seen conclusive evidence. Oh sure, I'm sure they stop a terrorist now and then, but the question is whether the threat they themselves pose to liberty is worse than the threats they deal with.

    History suggests it is: people have vastly overestimated external threats compared to the threat from people nominally tasked with defending them.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  15. Re:And what will happen if they do by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many of these large acts of evil can't happen without a lot of support from average people. So long as the average people in the NSA just doing their jobs help organizations like the NSA to remain staffed an operational they are complicit in the dirty dealings of the organization.

    The leaders do share a huge share of the ethical burden but definitely not all of it. They could not do what they do without so many people willing to help them and so many people that consider something to be just a job and don't look at the ethical issues at all.

    I wish we knew a lot more about these organizations. They should receive positive feedback when they operate the right way and negative when they act the wrong way. Right now they only get negative and I doubt the organization is universally bad but without both reinforcements and greater public awareness along with people unwilling to do these immoral acts it is very hard to get change.

    --
    Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
  16. Re:And what will happen if they do by Gunnut1124 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've heard that "Just following orders" defense somewhere before... You might want to Google that and see how those trials turned out. The fact that they are mindless drones in a machine that is performing reprehensible acts, but hold no hate for their victims themselves, does not make them innocent. After Snowden, anyone willing working for the NSA and not looking for work elsewhere is approving of and endorsing their crimes.

    --
    America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
  17. Re:And what will happen if they do by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So your argument is they are just following orders? That's pretty funny.

  18. Pot calling kettle black. Moss works for DHS by haus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it seem strange that someone working for the Federal Government (DHS) is asking other Federal Employees to stay away?

  19. Re:And what will happen if they do by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like any fed agency it's largely ordinary civil service just doing a day to day job to feed their family. Most of them are ordinary people no more deserving of your hate (and yes, it is bigoted hate, oriented around their job instead of race or creed) than anyone else.

    Would you make the same arguments about e.g. Al Qaeda's accountant? Or the contractors on the Death Star?

    Most of them are probably doing harmless innocuous work

    If you sweep the floors for the enemy, you're still working for the enemy.

    Beleive it or not the intelligence community does serve a useful purpose

    Only useful to those interested in projecting American hegemony across the planet for all of eternity.

    the same ordinary civil service workers who just "doing their job" and give no more thought to the moral rightness of what theyre doing than a Chevy worker does as he tightens the same nut 50k times a day as the line moves past.

    And that's the problem. They're morally negligent, that's no better than being morally wrong. Remember, the only thing required for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. These people aren't just doing nothing, they're providing support.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  20. Re:And what will happen if they do by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, this.

    I'm sure that throughout the decades there were perfectly normal and nice people that participated in the KKK. I imagine in some regions it was more of a BBQ-club than a hate-mongering organization. That people joined simply due to the social stigma of not joining, they liked their neighbors, and oh yeah, ra ra white power.

    But that doesn't matter, because the leadership of that organization is bat-shit anti-social insane. And by being in that group the members gave legitimacy to those leaders and provided them power. A nutter with just his cats to talk isn't a political threat. It's not a voting bloc. It's not an establishment that people in power care about. The nutter can still be dangerous all by himself, but not the sort of social force that the KKK represented. The leaders of the KKK aren't a big threat if they don't have anyone to lead.

    I don't particularly blame people working in federal positions for the atrocities of the federal government across the board. The postal worker in town didn't torture prisoners in Abu Ghraib. The US general in Iraq didn't illegally spy on US citizens. But they do share some of the blame just for being in the same group. The same way that I share some of the blame by being a US citizen. (Because we run this town, right? Right!?)

    But I 100% completely blame the NSA workers associated with this spying project for being complacent about it's violation of the US constitution. I've worked places where the broad governing rules were paid lip service, and everyone generally agreed that we should be following them, but specifically disagreed about how we were blatantly violating them because of excuse excuse excuse, it's-special-in-this-case. If the hammer came down, EVERYONE in that company deserved to be hit. I know, I know, you wants to keep your job, you don't want to rock the boat, and you think you're doing some good in the world. So pass the buck. Send an email. Ask the boss in a very traceable and and blunt way. Do that and now it's HIS problem. Give him some time to decide if he wants to double-down on doing something illegal or if he wants to fix it. If he doesn't fix it, GO OVER HIS HEAD. Because it's good for the company/government/society to fix these problems. In the long run.

    And if you can't trust the official channels, fuck it, blow that whistle.