Slashdot Mirror


Mastermind of 9/11 Attacks Designs a Secret Vacuum Cleaner

HonorPoncaCityDotCom writes "AP reports that while confined to the basement of a CIA secret prison in Romania about a decade ago, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the admitted mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, asked his jailers whether he could design a vacuum cleaner. After all KSM earned his bachelor's in mechanical engineering, the agency had no long-term plan for him, but might thought he might someday prove useful and might even stand trial one day and for that, he'd need to be sane. They were concerned that his long imprisonment might do so much psychological damage that he would no longer be useful as source for information. "We didn't want them to go nuts," said a former senior CIA official. So, using schematics from the Internet as his guide, Mohammed began re-engineering one of the most mundane of household appliances. It remains a mystery how far Mohammed got with his designs or whether the plans still exist and even Mohammed's military lawyer, Jason Wright, says he is prohibited from discussing his client's interest in vacuums. 'It sounds ridiculous, but answering this question, or confirming or denying the very existence of a vacuum cleaner design, a Swiffer design, or even a design for a better hand towel would apparently expose the U.S. government and its citizens to exceptionally grave danger,' says Wright. So now, says Doug Mataconis, if you happen to start seeing ads for the CIA's revolutionary new home cleaning device, you'll know where it came from." Sounds perfect for In-Q-Tel.

10 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. admitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    He was tortured in order to obtain the confession, I don't know what good it is.

    1. Re:admitted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why you don't torture people who you think are criminals -- it does nothing but contribute doubt to your case. Society learned long ago that a torture-free imprisonment, followed by a fair and impartial trial, was the most effective way to ensure that an admission of guilt (or conviction) was credible and final.

    2. Re:admitted? by Omestes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup, the sad fact is that torture actually works and it can save lives when executed properly.

      I doubt the truthfulness of this statement, on the basis of numerous studies, history, and a basic understanding of human psychology. But even if it was true, it is irrelevant, since it switches the argument against torture into and ethical and humanitarian one, which is also pretty solid. There also is the matter of hypocracy, since we can never actually condemn torture (of the so-called "good-guys"), as long as we advocate it.

      The fact that there is a debate about the merits of torture is absolutely astounding to to me. Astounding and abhorrent.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    3. Re:admitted? by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You see, right there is your problem. You're arguing it wrong. Don't argue that it leads to better trials, better convictions, yada yada, then they can argue back against you about it. They can disagree. This isn't something that should be a debatable issue.

      Argue: "Torture is evil. If we administer it, WE are evil people. It is all about hate, revenge and there is no excuse, no justification for it, ever. If a man were guarding the knowledge that would cure all mortal illness and the only way to get the cure from him were torture, it would STILL be wrong to commit it. We cannot give up our very souls for security because all we'll truely be secure in is our own shame."

    4. Re:admitted? by Livius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless the aim of torture of one guy is actually to frighten and discourage a bunch of other guys not yet residing in your secret lair dungeons.

      The purpose of torture is to terrorize others. That's why torture is 'secret' (because it's illegal), but that 'secret' always seems to very widely known.

      When a prisoner is tortured, a decision has already been made that it's not about criminal justice or reliable information.

  2. Mk 1 by Coditor · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the vacuum starts looking like a giant metal guy with a glowing center light maybe they should rethink this idea.

  3. I've heard... by Guano_Jim · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...his design sucked.

    Thank you! I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

  4. Life Imitates Art ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Remember the Grahame Greene novel "Our Man in Havana"? The protagonist is a CIA agent who gets tired of his job trying to uncover missile silos and communist plots in Cuba and starts microfilming close-ups of vacuum cleaner schematics and sending those back to Washington.

    So now we have a Guantanamo detainee drawing vacuum cleaner schematics? Which are no doubt being photographed and pored over by CIA agents for evidence of terrorist plots.....

  5. grave danger by thereitis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds ridiculous, but answering this question, or confirming or denying the very existence of a vacuum cleaner design, a Swiffer design, or even a design for a better hand towel would apparently expose the U.S. government and its citizens to exceptionally grave danger

    This kind of hyperbole is what makes people ignore warnings.

  6. Re:I wont pretend to be impressed for this salesma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    10 years in prison without due process.
    Tortured.

    Nice democracy you have there.