Slashdot Mirror


When Space Weather Attacks Earth

Lasrick writes "Brad Plumer details the 1859 solar storm known as the Carrington Event. Pretty fascinating stuff: 'At the time, it was a dazzling display of nature. Yet if the same thing happened today, it would be an utter catastrophe...That's not a lurid sci-fi fantasy. It's a sober new assessment by Lloyd's of London, the world's oldest insurance market. The report notes that even a much smaller solar-induced geomagnetic storm in 1989 left 6 million people in Quebec without power for nine hours.'"

176 comments

  1. OMG 9 hour... by Valentinial · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    9 hours no electricity? what a catastrophe. I've done that for 9, 18, 24 or so hours, it was called camping

    --
    @Valentinial
    1. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Brad1138 · · Score: 2

      I do it every night, heat is off for summer and all electricity is off over night. I like to sleep for about 9 hours.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    2. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      9 hours no electricity? what a catastrophe. I've done that for 9, 18, 24 or so hours, it was called camping

      Depends. If your oxygen concentrator doesn't run for 9 hours or you can't keep your insulin cold for 9 hours, yeah it could be a catastrophe. If you have lederly parents to care for or young children, yes it could be a problem. But if you are just thinking of no light bulbs or tv, yeah, then it probably isn't a big deal. OTOH, no subways, elevators, mass transit, gasoline heating or cooling (depending on the time of the year and your location), no emergency response or telephones to even contact them. Would that be a catastrophe? For some it could very well be.

    3. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Brad1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't uncommon to lose power for about a week with storms in this area. We loose power for about 9 hours probably once a year or so and for a week about once every 10 years. We all manage to survive. You can't stop the storms, so you deal with it. I don't see these solar storms as any worse and they are MUCH less frequent.

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    4. Re:OMG 9 hour... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      9 hours no electricity?

      . . . means 9 hours of no light pollution. Awesome, for watching the amazing aurora borealis! No TV? No Internet? Get outside, and look at a sky that you will never see again!

      Of course, let's hope that hospitals and such are prepared . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:OMG 9 hour... by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the worst case, it could leave 20 million to 40 million people in the Northeast without power — possibly for years — as utilities struggled to replace thousands of fried transformers stretching from Washington to Boston.

      Nine hours was the relatively minor 1989 event. Something like the Carrington event could be much, much more damaging.

      I'll leave it to your imagination how it might be to live and work in major urban areas with a severely damaged grid.

    6. Re:OMG 9 hour... by jklovanc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If your oxygen concentrator doesn't run for 9 hours

      There are other reasons that solar flares that cause power outages. If one's life depends on concentrated oxygen one should have a backup supply to last a few days.

      you can't keep your insulin cold for 9 hours

      According to the FDA insulin will last quite a while without refrigeration.

      Insulin products contained in vials or cartridges supplied by the manufacturers (opened or unopened) may be left unrefrigerated at a temperature between 59F and 86F for up to 28 days and continue to work. However, an insulin product that has been altered for the purpose of dilution or by removal from the manufacturer’s original vial should be discarded within two weeks.

      There are many reasons power can be out for quite a while; weather, earthquake, equipment failure, etc. The point is that short term, less than a few days, without power should be able to be handled by individuals. If a catastrophe is going to happen if the power goes out for a few days there is a much bigger issue than space weather.

      PS. I see this as another misuse of a word to sensationalize a story. Space weather may cause local problems but not catastrophes.

    7. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You sort of missed the point. A full-blown Carrington Event, like in 1859, could result in many months or perhaps a year without electricity. It's relatively easy to sit out a few hours or perhaps a week without power, but I think that you would find it a different story with out power for half a year or year (or tightly rationed power for that period of time). Like, perhaps you wouldn't have a job, and there would be signficant food shortages...

    8. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

      It isn't uncommon to lose power for about a week with storms in this area. We loose power for about 9 hours probably once a year or so and for a week about once every 10 years. We all manage to survive. You can't stop the storms, so you deal with it. I don't see these solar storms as any worse and they are MUCH less frequent.

      You are talking about a small geographic area, they are talking planet wide and actually for an entire year.

    9. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      There are many reasons power can be out for quite a while; weather, earthquake, equipment failure, etc. The point is that short term, less than a few days, without power should be able to be handled by individuals. If a catastrophe is going to happen if the power goes out for a few days there is a much bigger issue than space weather.

      PS. I see this as another misuse of a word to sensationalize a story. Space weather may cause local problems but not catastrophes.

      Yes there are, but with the exception of equipment failure when sever weather or earthquake occur, don't we call those natural disasters? Maybe disasters and catastrophes are two different things? From the article, though, they aren't talking about power being off for a few hours in a small area, but the power grids being destroyed world wide and taking a year or more to rebuild them. Satellites would be destroyed, so most communications would be out, even if power were restored. It might not be a catastrophe like the people in Pompei experienced, but for modern societies, they would have real problems.

      Look at that cruise ship that was without power for a few days, now imagine that scenario across the entire country. No electricity also means no water, no gas (both natural and gasoline), no oil, no manufacturing no retail no nothing. Sure there are emergency generators but they aren't meant to last for a year and when their fuel runs out where will they get more from? The local gas station doesn't have a generator to pump the gas out of the ground.

      The article is not crying out "Prepare for the end of the world!" No, all it is saying is that steps should be taken to harden the power grid and essential systems so that if an event occurs, power can quickly be restored.

    10. Re:OMG 9 hour... by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nine hours was the relatively minor 1989 event. Something like the Carrington event could be much, much more damaging.

      Nine hours Is about the maximum duration and the Carrington event wasn't much longer than that. Once your part of the world rotates into the dark you are shielded from most of the the CME effects. (Not all, but the most damaging high energy flow is diverted around the earth).

      Further CMEs don't tend to last more than a couple days at worst. And they take 3 to 4 days to arrive, so people have time to unplug stuff, and even to de-energize and temporarily ground long transmission lines. Your local power company already knows where every manual disconnect switch is, and can have the local grid broken into small segments and de-energized in mere hours. Some of these are in cabinets in your neighborhood, and some are on power poles (long rod running to a locked lever arm near the ground).

      Long un-grounded transmission lines (or similar structures, even electric fences) are the most easily effected. But anything that is grounded periodically (every few miles) is not particularly affected. Nobody thought of this in the era of telegraph, but its built into every system these days with the possible exception of highpower transmission lines.

      Modern building wiring, with GFI and GFCI would probably all trip, preventing a lot of infrastructure damage, and if not, you've got 4 days to plan manual breaker tripping.

      These surges won't affect big pump motors as the story suggests, because 1) you know they are coming ahead of time, 2) its easy to disconnect the pump motors from the mains, and start your local diesel generators for the duration. The disconnect switch gear and the local generators are already built into critical infrastructure. Short runs between the backup generators and the pumps would not build up any induced currents.

      The story is a great deal of hyperventilating by people who don't really understand how infrastructure is built these days.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    11. Re:OMG 9 hour... by ebno-10db · · Score: 1

      9 hours no electricity?

      . . . means 9 hours of no light pollution. Awesome, for watching the amazing aurora borealis! No TV? No Internet? Get outside, and look at a sky that you will never see again!

      What if it's cloudy?

    12. Re:OMG 9 hour... by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

      If you cannot survive without electricity for 9 hours, you have to expect to die.
      Hell 3 days would be my absolute minimum, with multiple backup plans planned.
      Sure, there are broader cases, and legitimate reasons.

      I think here in Canada, they strictly recommend that you are capable of surviving one or two days if you go out driving in winter. Because there is a chance that you and hundreds of others will be stuck in a blizzard and trapped without outside help for at least that long.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    13. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 2

      A full-blown Carrington Event, like in 1859, could result in many months or perhaps a year without electricity.

      Or it might be just a couple of days till the event is over. It apparently is not that hard to protect this sort of equipment against the sort of surges that a Carrington Event would generate.

    14. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long un-grounded transmission lines (or similar structures, even electric fences) are the most easily effected. But anything that is grounded periodically (every few miles) is not particularly affected.

      The most subtle troll I've seen in a while.

    15. Re:OMG 9 hour... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Gasoline heating or cooling via electricity? Where is this common practice?

      Most gasoline is stored below ground at stations for the purposes of preventing vapor volume loss. I'm not aware whether transport trucks employ cooling systems, but I doubt it's terribly necessary due to the volume of liquid we're dealing with.

      Now, diesel heating is another matter. But even diesel is stored below ground, and the heating is usually done by inline vehicle systems.

      I'd be interested in knowing more about this if you have any more info. I'm not finding much through a google search.

      As far as the effects of what is basically a global EMP, we'd basically be dealing with a complete failure of modern infrastructure. Even old point-based automotive systems (no modern electronics) would likely have issues if it's bad enough - they still rely upon electricity. Older diesels could be push or crank started, but that'd require some messing.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    16. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      A full-blown Carrington Event, like in 1859, could result in many months or perhaps a year without electricity.

      Or it might be just a couple of days till the event is over. It apparently is not that hard to protect this sort of equipment against the sort of surges that a Carrington Event would generate.

      Only if you do it. And it will only be done if those responsible for it are aware of the danger.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    17. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Gasoline heating or cooling via electricity? Where is this common practice?

      I'm pretty sure he just forgot a comma after "gasoline".
      So: No gasoline (because the pumps don't work), no cooling (almost all cooling depends on electricity; note that the most important cooling is not air condition, but food cooling), no heating (although in most regions, electricity is not used directly for heating, most central heating systems still depend on electric pumps to transport the heat to the rooms).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    18. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      ... and that the solar storm didn't destroy their emergency equipment.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    19. Re:OMG 9 hour... by ancientt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a long article, I can understand why you might not have gone through it. Here's some snipsthat might be important to note and that caught my attention when I was reading up on it previously.

      ...if even 20 transformers in the Northeast were knocked out, the logistical challenges would be "extremely concerning."

      In the worst case, it could leave 20 million to 40 million people in the Northeast without power - possibly for years - as utilities struggled to replace thousands of fried transformers stretching from Washington to Boston.

      ..."That's a key vulnerability," Smith says. "If you had a really big solar event, there just aren't enough replacement transformers available. It can take up to 12 months to build new ones."

      ...One problem, says Chris Beck of the Electric Infrastructure Security Council, is that many of these technologies are expensive and could make the current grid slightly less efficient in its day-to-day operations.

      "We've designed our power lines to work efficiently under perfect conditions - long transmission lines, high voltages," Beck says. Unfortunately, those characteristics make the grid particularly vulnerable to a solar storm. So there's a trade-off.

      So yeah, Lloyd's of London and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission disagree with you for good reasons.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    20. Re:OMG 9 hour... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Don't forget roads in urban areas. No power means no traffic signals.

    21. Re:OMG 9 hour... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      That gasoline goes below ground, but the pumps to get it out are electric. No power, no pumps.

      The gas station operators could open the fill hole and stick a hand-pump in, but it'd be very slow to dispense - and with panic buying inevitable, the queue could take hours to get through.

    22. Re:OMG 9 hour... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if you can generate local power and the utility goes out regularly it's not a problem.. the power needed to keep the city running(as a functioning social concept, police etc) and hospitals you can still get as long as it doesn't fry everything, totally, everywhere, which it doesn't seem to(since spares aren't affected).

      if your generator gets fried then it becomes a bit of a bigger problem. unless your refrigator runs on gas and you have an ample supply. but it doesn't seem a carrington event would fry every generator? the article just talks about transformers and how it would take years and years to replace them.. which frankly seems unlikely. the event wouldn't even remove the wiring, which is something that could take years to put back up if the wires and poles suddenly disappeared. but the telegram wires didn't disappear in a blink of flash.

      the article is just a bit.. well, it's written in the vein of "we are unprepared and cutting money from the wrong things because tomorrow something COULD happen!" but it's kinda boring in context of for example yellowstone exploding.. or any other number of events that could cause problems. carrington event just seems like one of those events that would make unemployment disappear for couple of years and put the internet down for maybe a month - a major event, sure, but not as major as a zombie apocalypse or ww2.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    23. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or a Culture Ship Mind.

    24. Re:OMG 9 hour... by jftitan · · Score: 1

      My question is... Do I have to keep paying my Electric bill if the power is out for nearly a year. I surely would SAVE A TON! in not paying for electricity.

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
    25. Re:OMG 9 hour... by harperska · · Score: 1

      Hand pump out enough gasoline to start a generator, and use it to power the pumps for dispensing?

    26. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sribe · · Score: 1

      It isn't uncommon to lose power for about a week with storms in this area. We loose power for about 9 hours probably once a year or so and for a week about once every 10 years.

      6,000,000 people at once???

      It's not just the duration, but also the extent...

    27. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      That really should have read no gasoline, heating or cooling... instead of no gasoline heating or cooling. The heating and cooling was referencing climate control depending on what time of year this hit (or hemisphere).

      Still, while it would be possible to use a generator to power the gas pumps, you won't be able to run down to the local Home Depot and pick one up and just wire it in. For one, they just don't stock that many. And secondly, it is unlikely that they would have one large enough for a gas station to use to run it's pumps. Then there is the whole business of how the gas distributor is going to fill the trucks to get the gas to the station in the first place.

      Put differently, look how disruptive a major storm can be and that is usually over a limited geographic area so that the rest of the country can marshal resources and send help. Now expand that to an entire continent or the planet.

    28. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Only if you do it. And it will only be done if those responsible for it are aware of the danger.

      They'll have at least a day or two of warning. Possibly much more. Even if they do nothing to prepare, that's enough time to take critical components off the grid.

      And if we're talking about it on Slashdot, then they're aware of it to some degree.

    29. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      You are correct, thank you.

    30. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Hand pump out enough gasoline to start a generator, and use it to power the pumps for dispensing?

      I'll play. And where do you get the generator from? I'm pretty sure if it were as simple as hand pumping or using a generator to get gas from the storage tanks, then when there are natural disasters, people would do exactly that. However that is not the case.

    31. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Normally the major part of your electricity bill is the energy (kWh) you used. If the power is out, you certainly don't use any, therefore you don't pay any.

      Of course there's the question about the price you pay for the fact that electricity is available to you. If the electricity is not available for a longer time, you could possibly argue that they didn't fulfil their part of the contract, and therefore you don't have to pay. However IANAL.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    32. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1
      And those "good reasons" are? The main argument is arguing that if we ignore solar activity of this magnitude, we can fry a lot of hard to replace stuff. The solution is obvious. Don't ignore it.

      Second, I don't buy that it'll take a year to replace such components. My take is that a competent, large machine shop can crank out a replacement inside of about a week. It won't be up to whatever specs they have for those specialized transformers and other components, so don't load it like fresh from the factory equipment. I don't buy that they can't jury rig a functioning grid in a short span of time.

      "We've designed our power lines to work efficiently under perfect conditions - long transmission lines, high voltages," Beck says. Unfortunately, those characteristics make the grid particularly vulnerable to a solar storm. So there's a trade-off.

      Third, power lines aren't working under anything resembling perfect conditions. A lot of bad things happen to them already, including strong solar storms. The speaker here is just blowing smoke. Sure, long transmission lines are relatively bad when a solar storm hits. But the capability to handle high voltages have the opposite effect, making them more resilient to high voltage effects of solar storms.

    33. Re:OMG 9 hour... by jamesh · · Score: 2

      9 hours no electricity?

      . . . means 9 hours of no light pollution. Awesome, for watching the amazing aurora borealis! No TV? No Internet? Get outside, and look at a sky that you will never see again!

      Of course, let's hope that hospitals and such are prepared . . .

      ... for the triffid uprising after everyone goes blind!

    34. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      They'll have at least a day or two of warning.

      Not if they no longer have the means which provide the warnings, due to cost-cutting.

      And if we're talking about it on Slashdot, then they're aware of it to some degree.

      Great logic. "You've warned us and thus now we are aware. Since we are aware, you should not have warned us."

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    35. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure if it were as simple as hand pumping or using a generator to get gas from the storage tanks, then when there are natural disasters, people would do exactly that. However that is not the case.

      What do you mean that's not the case? Is there some disaster where they were unable to do this?

    36. Re:OMG 9 hour... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      In a normal weather storm induced blackout things generally work once the downed power-lines are repaired, in a space weather induced blackout, there are tremendous current loops transformers exploding, lines melting, electronics frying; things are not going to work.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    37. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      And if we're talking about it on Slashdot, then they're aware of it to some degree.

      Great logic. "You've warned us and thus now we are aware. Since we are aware, you should not have warned us."

      No, I have to disagree. That's terrible logic. And completely irrelevant to what I wrote. For example, I said nothing about what anyone "should" do.

    38. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      My take is that a competent, large machine shop can crank out a replacement inside of about a week.

      Even if that large machine shop is also not getting electricity? And where does it get the needed materials in such a short time?

      BTW, can you explain how you get to that assumption?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    39. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Provided the protective measures are implemented in time. Note that the protective measures include shutting the grid down, so it's only going to be done if they feel quite sure there's a problem.

    40. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to invent and invest to that organic technology as a back-up for the essential services. A sentient mass transit system, moaning from the pleasures of delivering morning traffic. It could become a fun subject for an artist.

    41. Re:OMG 9 hour... by ancientt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even if the machine shop is getting electricity. This isn't detailed in TFA but is well documented elsewhere. Take this article where they explain:

      The consequences of a transformer failure are catastrophic, as there is a lack of manufacturing capacity for extra high-voltage transformers in the U.S.A. and worldwide. According to a study by the Metatech Corporation, commissioned under Executive Order 13407 for assessment of vulnerability to geomagnetic storms, manufacturers presently have a backlog of nearly three years for all extra high-voltage transformers (230 kilovolts and above). Only one plant exists in the U.S.A. capable of manufacturing a transformer up to 345 kV. There is no manufacturing capability in the U.S.A. for 500 kV and 765 kV transformers, which represent the largest group of at-risk transformers in the U.S. power grid. The 500 and 765 kV transformers are the backbone of the grid that extends into regions that contain nearly 80 percent of the U.S. population, according to John Kappenman of Storm Analysis Consultants and Metatech Corp.

      A further example to make it more obvious that khallow doesn't actually understand what the problem is.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    42. Re:OMG 9 hour... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The problem is telluric currents, electrical current induced in the conductive layers of the Earth and in long conductors either on or under the surface.

      A time-varying magnetic field external to the Earth induces telluric currents—electric currents in the conducting ground. These currents create a secondary (internal) magnetic field. As a consequence of Faraday's law of induction, an electric field at the surface of the Earth is induced associated with time variations of the magnetic field. The surface electric field causes electrical currents, known as geomagnetically induced currents (GIC), to flow in any conducting structure, for example, a power or pipeline grid grounded in the Earth. This electric field, measured in V/km, acts as a voltage source across networks.Geomagnetically induced current

      These telluric currents can be caused when a solar mass ejection strikes the Earth's magnetosphere and deflects it. During the Solar storm of 1859,

      Telegraph systems all over Europe and North America failed, in some cases shocking telegraph operators.[7] Telegraph pylons threw sparks. [8] Some telegraph systems continued to send and receive messages despite having been disconnected from their power supplies.[9] Solar storm of 1859

      ;
      During the Soviet Test 184, a 300 kilotons was detonated at an altitude of 290 km (180 mi)

      For one of the K Project tests, Soviet scientists instrumented a 570-kilometer (350 mi) section of telephone line in the area that they expected to be affected by the pulse. The monitored telephone line was divided into sub-lines of 40 to 80 kilometres (25 to 50 mi) in length, separated by repeaters. Each sub-line was protected by fuses and by gas-filled overvoltage protectors. The EMP from the 22 October (K-3) nuclear test (also known as Test 184) blew all of the fuses and fired all of the overvoltage protectors in all of the sub-lines.[15]

      Published reports, including a 1998 IEEE article,[15] have stated that there were significant problems with ceramic insulators on overhead electrical power lines during the tests. A 2010 technical report written for Oak Ridge National Laboratory stated, "Power line insulators were damaged, resulting in a short circuit on the line and some lines detaching from the poles and falling to the ground."[17]Nuclear electromagnetic pulse

      So yes not only can your generator get fried if it is connected to AC neutral and ground, but that is not the worst of it. Think the wildfires happening out west are in Colorado and Arizona are bad, imagine arcing powerlines dropping of the poles all over the continental US and Canada.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    43. Re:OMG 9 hour... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      During the Carrington event, the aurora was so bright people thought it was dawn and you could read newspapers by their light. The Aurora could be seen in Cuba and Hawaii.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    44. Re:OMG 9 hour... by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      basically a global EMP

      I was starting to think I was on the wrong website, I had to read down this far before someone finally understands the threat is more than a just a mess of power line knocked down in a storm. Sure humans were built to survive without electricity, but not in the vast numbers created by our invention of civilization. The numbers supported by a civilization are directly related to its technology level. Without electricity we will be metaphorically back in the 1920's with 7X the number of people on our little rock requiring food and shelter.

      If the damage takes too long to fix civil war and mass migration is a likely outcome, which will be hard to believe for people who think that drought has nothing to do with the Syrian war.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    45. Re:OMG 9 hour... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      The CME that caused the Carrington Event followed a preceding CME that "cleared the path" which allowed the CME to arrive in just 17 hours.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    46. Re:OMG 9 hour... by icebike · · Score: 1

      allegedly. It was s long time ago.

      And as I mentioned, the first CME happened more than three days earlier, and was already causing problems, so there was already reason to put their plan in action.

      But with telegraph in its infancy, they had no plan, and no knowledge of these events. And yet a day later the Telegraph system was back to normal, with no need of repair.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    47. Re:OMG 9 hour... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      there are emergency systems for such situations. be prepared, those you really care about are your responsibility

    48. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our businesses will move from PC sales and service to abacus sales and service. Metal coins and shiny rocks only please.

    49. Re:OMG 9 hour... by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Well, if the electricity is gone, you could always cancel your "service" -- if you could actually contact them somehow, and their computers were working ...

    50. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Even if that large machine shop is also not getting electricity?

      Why would that happen? Get some portable generators and that problem is solved. Solar flares won't nail most electrical equipment unless that happens to connected to the grid and gets fried as a result.

      And where does it get the needed materials in such a short time?

      We have an industrial society. There's plenty of crap lying around in junk yards and warehouses.

      BTW, can you explain how you get to that assumption?

      Sure. As I understand it, transformers of this class consist of a pile of wound copper or aluminum wire, usually bathed in some sort of oil or other electrically nonconductive, heat conducting fluid. And they often have to fit in a certain form factor. A machine shop can make something with the right winding number (even if the transformer in question is the size of a refrigerator) and some degree of cooling. It's not going to take as much abuse, but the choice for the short term after such a mess is no power or some power.

      A lot of the gear is unusual just due to its size and voltage/current/heat dissipation requirements, but is otherwise similar to smaller scale electrical components. I doubt they'll be able to manufacture computer-controlled gear on the spur of the moment, but manual controlled gear is viable.

    51. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. That's why I proposed making these in machine shops rather than in a manufacturing plant. Because there's a lot more than one machine shop in the US.

    52. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      They'll have several days warning if not months of warning (it sounds like the Carrington event was part of a larger episode of solar activity).

    53. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      which will be hard to believe for people who think that drought has nothing to do with the Syrian war.

      This seems a bit out of the blue. Sure, mismanage your vital infrastructure enough (be it water mismanagement or not taking down your electricity grid in the face of a Carrington event) and yes, you'll screw your society. Sure, it's bad when such things happen, but there's a ready solution - don't do that. Developed world societies (of which Syria is not part) have been pretty good at not doing that.

      My view here is that let's look at actual responses to real world emergencies and similar issues. If those start going wrong, then you'll know that you need to stock up on food and ammunition. I wouldn't trust the developed world with economic messes, but they do a fair job with natural disasters.

      Going back to the Syrian drought, for me the key symptom is the tremendous mismanagement of water. That alone probably is responsible for the "drought". If you drain the water table, then you eliminate the local contribution to air moisture and rainfall. For a dry region like Syria, that means you're left with what little trickles in with the weather.

      There are places in California and Arizona that did this sort of thing with similar results (for example, Owens Valley in California when most of its water was diverted to Los Angeles).

    54. Re:OMG 9 hour... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, transformers of this class consist of a pile of wound copper or aluminum wire, usually bathed in some sort of oil or other electrically nonconductive, heat conducting fluid.

      While that's of course the core of any transformator, there's a lot of technology around it. To start with, you want to control the phase, because that's how you control how much power is flowing (and in which direction -- you don't generally want the power to flow from the grid to the power plant, after all).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    55. Re:OMG 9 hour... by mu22le · · Score: 2

      Will you still accept bitcoins? Paper bitcoins, maybe? :)

    56. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. They could have as little as an hour notice to an actual event. It used to be no warning at all, but data from SOHO at the Earth Sun Lagrange point is now being analyzed in real time for that reason.

      There is actually some effort to put a proper advisory system and emergency protocols in place, but that isn't complete yet.

    57. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sjames · · Score: 1

      How does one ground a power line without shorting to ground?

    58. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      They could have as little as an hour notice to an actual event.

      Do you have an example of this? I've been hearing of lead times of almost three quarters of a day for the Carrington event (and perhaps longer) and that was apparently because a previous flare had "cleared" a path.

    59. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      To start with, you want to control the phase, because that's how you control how much power is flowing (and in which direction -- you don't generally want the power to flow from the grid to the power plant, after all).

      That is more complicated. But it's still possible to build them in a machine shop. I grant the first one probably wouldn't be made in a week, but it's not going to take a year. I'm more concerned about components that use semiconductors (such as the "static VAR compensator" which uses thyristors). Again, it's still possible to make such things in a machine shop, but now you need some sort of experience in making and doping semiconductors by hand to specification. There would be a lot of trial and error for that.

    60. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, do you remember what happened after Katrina??? It was Lord of the Fucking Flies for the first week after the storm left.

      Now imagine that in every city and NOBODY coming to help. Katrina was localized, people and supplies from more than 500 miles away could then be brought in. If EVERY place is hit where are the people and supplies going to come from?????

    61. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, we can see it coming but until it reaches SOHO (the space probe), we don't know how severe it will be. How many times a year do we want to drop the grid when we see an event coming?

      The majority of such events are handled fine by existing procedures where specific lines are dropped based on measured currents. That happens as often as 24 times a year. However, if an exceptionally strong event occurs, system damage might happen before those procedures come into play.

    62. Re:OMG 9 hour... by cusco · · Score: 1

      Not hard != Free, so for the corporate suits whose budgetary approval is required it's a dice toss. Is the next Carrington Event likely to happen before the game of executive musical chairs rotates them into another corporation or another industry? No. Will spending money on this reduce profitability during the next quarter and affect their bonus? Yes. Ergo, the industry will almost certainly not take any preventative measures that are not required by law. Remember the last big blackout? It was caused by reducing the budget for basic maintenance and tree trimming in order to improve the executives' bonuses, so there certainly is precedent.

      A really big issue for the industry is that all the big transformers and relays are essentially custom items, and there is a three to eighteen month order time on them. No one has more than one or two spares for the big equipment on hand. It's not currently a problem, since any large project has a couple of years lead time, and the stuff is designed to last for decades so there is almost never more than one failure. Lose a bunch of them? There **IS** no precedent for that, and no conceivable work-around. I used to work in the electrical generation and distribution industry, and this sort of thing keeps engineers up at night.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    63. Re:OMG 9 hour... by cusco · · Score: 1

      No, you can't just crank this equipment out in Joe's Machine Shop and Bar-Be-Que, you have no clue what you're talking about.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    64. Re:OMG 9 hour... by icebike · · Score: 1

      Reread what I wrote.
      The idea is to de-energize the line by disconnecting it from the generators, then ground the line every X miles to prevent solar induced current in order to protect infrastructure.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    65. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, when should we do that? ertainly not after a damaging voltage fries the system. That's why we have 'alarmists' calling for action now to create an appropriate early warning system and procedures such as disconnecting the lines. Until we have that in place, it's all just coulda, shoulda, woulda, and a bunch of burned up equipment.

    66. Re:OMG 9 hour... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The difference being, however, that you were prepared to be camping when you did... the lack of electricity did not arrive upon you without expectation, and you had specifically equipped yourself to get by without electricity for the period you expected to be camping.

      When something unplanned arises, and you have no idea how long it will be before the electricity returns, the situation is another kettle of fish entirely.

    67. Re:OMG 9 hour... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Second, I don't buy that it'll take a year to replace such components.

      Whether you "buy" it or not is irrelevant to the veracity of the notion.

      My take is that a competent, large machine shop can crank out a replacement inside of about a week

      *A* replacement part. Singular. Scale that. Where a power station has to replace over half of its components, not just one or two. Further, practically every major power station in the entire world would be affected by the event... and these machine shops generally would each service more than one power station, since it is not normally the case that multiple stations need replacement at the same time, and the cost of keeping spares around for parts that fail so infrequently is prohibitive.

      Plus, of course, most of the machine shops worldwide would themselves generally not have any power either... so they aren't likely to get the first components out in just a week, like you project. Yeah, a year is perhaps a very realistic estimate on when most people could expect their power to return at reliable levels.... for some people I'd think it could be as long as two.

      For some people, especially in very urban areas, it may be as little as just a few weeks to a couple of months, but I don't think for a moment that a year is an exaggeration. If anything, it's certain to be an underestimate for some.

      . Third, power lines aren't working under anything resembling perfect conditions. A lot of bad things happen to them already, including strong solar storms

      Nothing of the scale of the event in 1859.

    68. Re:OMG 9 hour... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Even if the machine shop is getting electricity. This isn't detailed in TFA but is well documented elsewhere. Take this article where they explain:

      The consequences of a transformer failure are catastrophic, as there is a lack of manufacturing capacity for extra high-voltage transformers in the U.S.A. and worldwide. According to a study by the Metatech Corporation, commissioned under Executive Order 13407 for assessment of vulnerability to geomagnetic storms, manufacturers presently have a backlog of nearly three years for all extra high-voltage transformers (230 kilovolts and above). Only one plant exists in the U.S.A. capable of manufacturing a transformer up to 345 kV. There is no manufacturing capability in the U.S.A. for 500 kV and 765 kV transformers, which represent the largest group of at-risk transformers in the U.S. power grid. The 500 and 765 kV transformers are the backbone of the grid that extends into regions that contain nearly 80 percent of the U.S. population, according to John Kappenman of Storm Analysis Consultants and Metatech Corp.

      A further example to make it more obvious that khallow doesn't actually understand what the problem is.

      I guess we would all get off the grid, and those of us lucky to get solar panels or windmills would be OK. No use thinking about gasoline or diesel powered generators -- the refineries would be as stuck without power, as would everyone else

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    69. Re:OMG 9 hour... by volmtech · · Score: 1

      In Florida most gas stations are required to have generators, as long as there is gasoline in the tanks (or diesel), the pumps will run.

    70. Re:OMG 9 hour... by volmtech · · Score: 1

      These transformers are 100 ton super oversize semi loads, built from the inside out. The process can not be sped up. Eighteen months.

    71. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't crank out embedded computers with a machine. But the rest of the gear, even the semiconductor-based stuff can be. A machine shop is not just a place for making screws, but a remarkably flexible manufacturing environment. We don't use them for most things simply because large scale manufacturing is much more economic and reliable.

    72. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      It was Lord of the Fucking Flies for the first week after the storm left.

      No, it wasn't. But that is a good point. If you're going to weather a Carrington event - don't do it in New Orleans.

    73. Re:OMG 9 hour... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Sure, we can see it coming but until it reaches SOHO (the space probe), we don't know how severe it will be. How many times a year do we want to drop the grid when we see an event coming?

      We have x-ray intensity and direct observation of the flare.

    74. Re:OMG 9 hour... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Neither of which tell us what we need to know.

    75. Re:OMG 9 hour... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      9 hours may be as long as you're "in the sun" during such an event, but there's something you're forgetting. It's an electromagnetic storm, and the earth's crust is conductive. (There were accounts of things receiving charge and hurting people a long time after dark with the Carrington event.)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    76. Re:OMG 9 hour... by icebike · · Score: 1

      That's nonsense.

      The only long distance distance wires in use at that time were telegraph wires. Rails are grounded. Short runs of wire, like fences do not build up a significant charge.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    77. Re:OMG 9 hour... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      That is a very simplistic overview of a large, high-voltage transformer. You realize that 765kV can start an arc across a little more than 25cm in air, right? And these transformers weigh in at many10's of tons, and are designed to handle MANY megawatts of power, perhaps up to 1000 MW (yes, that's a gigawatt). They may even have 1.21 JiggaWatt ones. :-)

      That is not something that can be cobbled together in a small factory.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    78. Re:OMG 9 hour... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      How do you figure?

      People steal gas like this all the time when power is out. One particular account I heard of: they parked directly over the fill point at a gas station with a full size cargo van. Inside the van, they had multiple large containers and a 12v pump. They had a 1' hole (or so) in the bottom of the van's body, near the rear axle, through which they were able to open the fill point and drop a hose. They'd done it several times before they were caught: the mistake was picking the same station 3 times in a row.

      You can get about a gallon per 20 rotations of a rotary vane pump - about 3-5 GPM, all depending.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    79. Re:OMG 9 hour... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Depends. If your oxygen concentrator doesn't run for 9 hours or you can't keep your insulin cold for 9 hours, yeah it could be a catastrophe. If you have lederly parents to care for or young children,

      Young children ... oh, you mean for feeding them warm milk. Don't you have tits? Or tits available in less than 9 hours? Or even camping stoves, pans and water? Besides which, while a babe-in-arms may be wailing and complaining, there are more than enough cases of babies being trapped in collapsed buildings for multiple days, in tropical weather, and surviving. Probably not exactly happy, but somewhere on the "not dead" side of dieing.

      Elderly and diabetic, with a temperature-sensitive variant of insulin. Strange you should say that, as my Dad, who manages medicine for my diabetic Mum, had the fridge breakdown while I was visiting at the weekend. (During what passes for a heatwave in this country.)
      "Big. Fucking. Deal."
      Insulin came out of the warming fridge and into a cooler-box (kept in the garage with the old camping kit) with several litre bottles of cold tap water and (this is the critical bit) about 10 litres of ice (in old milk cartons, IIRC) kept in the freezer for this precise purpose. Then, once Sis had come round to Mum-sit, we went off to find a fridge of the right size to replace the dead one (we trouble-shot until Sis arrived - the failure was in the fridge's compressor ; not an economical repair). That was going to be about 36 hours to deliver - not a problem.

      Dad isn't a paranoid ; but these are issues that he's faced before : power cuts during the miner's strikes of 1972 ; power grid failures during the winters of 1963 (IIRC ; before I was born) and about 1986 (IIRC ; I was in a different country by then), but not last winter. Camping trips ad nauseam taught the techniques. After that, it's just that rarest of commodities : common sense.

      Oxygen concentrator? If it is that critical to life, then surely you have bottled back-up oxygen (looking into my garden shed - a normal tank of 7 litre water capacity and 300 bar for 2100 litre STP of oxygen ; flow rate of 2 litres/ minute is sufficient for climbing Everest ; so you've 1000 minutes or some 16 hours ; I've got bigger tanks than that 7 litre "dumpy" and I'm nothing special in terms of diving equipment). OK, again I may be a touch more paranoid than most people, but when I have systems essential to life (e.g. my breathing air when I'm diving in caves), I have backup, on hand, and tested. And I drill in it's use. Dad is no more paranoid than I am, but he didn't get to be old by being reckless.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    80. Re:OMG 9 hour... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      It apparently is not that hard to protect this sort of equipment against the sort of surges that a Carrington Event would generate.

      One significant point is that when you blow a transformer/ switch gear/ whatever, then you often are going to fragment the network, and it's the complexity and particularly the areal extent of the networks that allows the big effects to accumulate. So, the fragmented segments of the network are likely to be less prone to further damage.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    81. Re:OMG 9 hour... by cusco · · Score: 1

      would make unemployment disappear for couple of years

      No, the opposite. What happens to a modern society with no electricity? Pretty much nothing. No factories run, no computers get turned on, no food gets refrigerated, no gasoline gets pumped, no petroleum gets refined, no natural gas gets processed, no phones ring, no cash registers work, no lights in the hospitals, no ATMs function, essentially modern civilization stops. Places like hospitals, data centers and telephone head ends have emergency generators, but once the couple days-worth of fuel runs out there isn't going to be any more coming for a while.

      No one goes to work, so no one gets paid. No one has access to their banks anyway, even if they did get paid. Very few people have more than a weeks-worth of food on hand, and they don't have cash to buy more even if the stores were open. For a couple of weeks at least it's not going to be very much better than a zombie apocalypse.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  2. About as much damage as Y2K by Brad1138 · · Score: 1, Troll

    I always hear about solar flares/storms etc. and the damage they can/will cause, but I have never once been affected by them. Seems like much ado about nothing.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    1. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by dtolman · · Score: 2

      Wow, with that kind of forward thinking you could run for Congress, or be a pundit!

      Hey - I have some land on Mount St Helens that I'd like to sell - want some?

    2. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suppose you've also heard about plague, AIDS and the measles, but if you've never been affected by them, then it must be a lot of made up rubbish, right?
      1) Smaller solar flares have affected the grid before. It's not unthinkable that a big one as mentioned in TFA can break a lot more stuff. Stuff that isn't exactly off the shelf in quantity. Might be a rare event, but if we can plan against it, maybe we should? Beats sitting in the dark for weeks.
      2) Speaking of Y2K... the reason nothing happened is because companies took action. I've been involved in Y2K work at the time, and while a lot of it was bullshit ("Make sure the coffee machines are Y2K-ready or we're doooooomed"), the power plant and telco I worked for would have been severly affected by Y2K if nothing had been done. Some of that was simply being prepared for any disaster; their systems had never been offline completely (only parts of it), and there was no procedure for a cold restart.

      In other words, when doom is called, consultants scramble to grab a piece of the hyped pie, companies take rational stock of their own situation and apply fixes as needed, and the general public scoffs as the event passes as another non-event, because of preparation and planning

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I always hear about solar flares/storms etc. and the damage they can/will cause, but I have never once been affected by them. Seems like much ado about nothing.

      You've probably hear alot but never been directly affected by terrorist attacts either. Doesn't mean that the risk isn't real and that society shouldn't prepare for it just incase.

    4. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by artor3 · · Score: 2

      The reason Y2K turned out not to be a big deal is because millions of programmers worked round the clock to fix their code in time. I would expect that people on Slashdot, of all places, would understand that.

      Unfortunately, we won't get sufficient advanced warning of a major solar storm.

    5. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by sphealey · · Score: 2

      Well, if you lived in Quebec or worked for any of the Canadian electric transmission providers your viewpoint might be a bit different...

      sPh

    6. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      I suspect the general public sees the hyped claims of various consultants a lot more than it sees the rational steps being taken. Why? because those "consultants" are trying to get free advertisments for their services by using the news. As long as the news facilitates this, the public either gets a distorted view, or has to go to the much more radical step of rejecting the basic trustworthyness of ALL news. Deciding the whole of mass media, entering your home for hours every day, is trying to con you, is a much bigger step than deciding a bunch of power companies, scientists, and odd little government agencies you seldom think about (i.e. the National Institute of Standards) are doing it.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    7. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by yndrd1984 · · Score: 0

      You've probably hear alot but never been directly affected by terrorist attacts either. Doesn't mean that the risk isn't real and that society shouldn't prepare for it just incase.

      And perhaps your country hasn't gone on a decade-long rampage of killing people and destroying civil liberties in response to terrorism. That doesn't mean that you shouldn't be wary people who may be overreacting to significant, but rare, problems.

    8. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 2

      Meh, US society would be a hell of a lot better off if we did absolutely nothing to mitigate terrorist attacks than as things stand now. Sadly, "give me liberty or give me death" has largely been replaced by "keep me safe at all costs" in popular sentiment.

      --
      Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
    9. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by icebike · · Score: 1

      , the power plant and telco I worked for would have been severly affected by Y2K if nothing had been done.

      The billing system would have been doomed, but power generation and call handling would have gone on just fine.
      Worst case would require a reboot of computerized call switching gear.

      I made a significant amount of money running through code in many different data systems preparing for y2k, and
      my analysis indicated that the systems we dealt with would have continued to run, but results would be wrong, people wouldn't get
      paid, or would get paid too much, sure. But if we just waited out the month of January, most of the date checks would
      have started to work (at some level) again. We even ran tests on this on some systems.

      Many systems were just too massive (too much data) to restructure, so we just restructured the date comparisons with
      a "nearby" logical comparison* routine, allowing them to continue to run there old 6 digit dates for ever. The systems won't exist
      at y3K, but if they did, they would work just as well then.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the Y2K thing was treated very well.
      Very good work to all of them. Some machines did actually fail as well due to people not doing anything, or gave odd results to thinks.

      Equally, there is the similar Y38K.
      Even though by that date, you'd expect all those old machines to be out of service for a long time, there will likely be some still sitting around in common use.
      Most likely the ones that are will also be incapable of being updated since they'd usually be embedded systems with no firmware updates possible.
      Not sure if any tests have been done to see how systems would react to Y38K, especially with things like file integrity.

      I'm sure there are a few other odd random ones sitting in and around that are usually the fault of software bugs from devs not following standards right, or misreading them.
      I'm sure I have seen that quite a few times, especially in e-mail systems where it showed 2038 dates for e-mail arrival.

    11. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by icebike · · Score: 2

      Wow, with that kind of forward thinking you could run for Congress, or be a pundit!

      Hey - I have some land on Mount St Helens that I'd like to sell - want some?

      Yeah, I'll take that land. Its probably safe for another 30 thousand years.

      Look, you are being unfair.

      CMEs do not affect earth suddenly without warning. You get 3 to four days before the effect reaches earth.

      That is plenty of time to announce and plan for 1 one day power grid shutdown. You trip every breaker in the local grid, and you can protect the local transformers as well as the residential electronics. (Most grids can do this remotely.) You need several miles (10 or 50) before the effect of the CME will induce dangerous current. Every power cord isn't going to suddenly become a lethal chunk of wire.

      There is not a boogie man under your bed.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Meh, US society would be a hell of a lot better off if we did absolutely nothing to mitigate terrorist attacks than as things stand now. Sadly, "give me liberty or give me death" has largely been replaced by "keep me safe at all costs" in popular sentiment.

      That's besides the point. But as Benjamin Franklin said: "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

    13. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by khallow · · Score: 2

      Deciding the whole of mass media, entering your home for hours every day, is trying to con you, is a much bigger step than deciding a bunch of power companies, scientists, and odd little government agencies you seldom think about (i.e. the National Institute of Standards) are doing it.

      Depends on which media and scientists we're speaking of. For example, CNBC apparently spent a lot of time selling the Facebook IPO, including all day coverage on the day Facebook hit the stock market. Fox News is notorious for its bias. CNN just airs "live coverage" rather than actual news these days. And just about everyone notices that when news coverage from most sources actually brushes on knowledge that you know, they tend to get it very wrong - often in ways that are convenient for them. Con artists do that.

      On the other side, you have "climate change" and the various shenanigans surrounding that. Such as James Hansen's 1998 testimony where they cut the A/C so they could get a great photo op.

      Or "climategate", the leakage of emails from University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, which didn't have much in the way of actual crime (aside from Russian tax evasion and deliberately disobeying the UK Freedom of Information Act). But it did have remarkably bad code for vital tasks, chest thumping climatologists vowing (perhaps seriously perhaps not) to block publication of heretical research (and its subsequent insertion in IPCC records), and discussing concerns with research only in private (eg, the infamous "hide the decline" remark about not including tree ring data after 1960 in climate reconstructions).

      In other words, a mask for public consumption which hides a somewhat more biased and human side. Con artists do that too.

    14. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      In other words, when doom is called, consultants scramble to grab a piece of the hyped pie, companies take rational stock of their own situation and apply fixes as needed, and the general public scoffs as the event passes as another non-event, because of preparation and planning -- by JaredOfEuropa

      God bless those Europans.

    15. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I suppose you've also heard about plague, AIDS and the measles

      Plague? I stopped sleeping with punk rock girls with pet rats in their beds back in the '80s.

      AIDS? What do middle aged white guys care about AIDS? Not even their wives will have promiscuous sex with them.

      Measles? Kids get inoculated before they can worry about becoming autistic from the inoculation.

      It will be very difficult to rid the world of all human beings . . . we're like the toenail fungus of Mother Earth. Sure, take away our electricity and a lot of folks will suffer and die, but we'll still manage to get along somehow. We can't even destroy ourselves as a species, although we've put our best minds, leaders and efforts into the task.

      You see, as this guy in a bar was just telling me the other night:

      Man is a singular creature. He has a set of gifts which make him unique among the animals: so that, unlike them, he is not figure in the landscape - he is the shaper of the landscape ... But nature - that is, biological evolution - has not fitted man to any specific environment. On the contrary, by comparison with the grunion he has a rather crude survival kit; and yet - this is the paradox of the human condition - one that fits him to all environments.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    16. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Informative

      CMEs do not affect earth suddenly without warning. You get 3 to four days before the effect reaches earth.

      From Wikipedia (emphasis by me):

      From August 28, 1859, until September 2, numerous sunspots and solar flares were observed on the sun. Just before noon on September 1, the British astronomer Richard Carrington observed the largest flare,[3] which caused a major coronal mass ejection (CME) to travel directly toward Earth, taking 17.6 hours. Such a journey normally takes three to four days.

      So much for three or four days of warning.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    17. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by icebike · · Score: 2

      In 1859 we didn't have sun watching satellites.

      Further the the first solar flare was August 28, and the big one was first noticed on September 1st.
      So there were in excess of 3 days warning.

      The first flare also caused enough disruption that telegraph didn't work, so in the modern era we would have been preparing for that one, long before the second one started.

      But, hey, nice selective quote.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    18. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by maxwell+demon · · Score: 0

      In 1859 we didn't have sun watching satellites.

      Even the best satellite cannot watch an event before it happens.

      Further the the first solar flare was August 28, and the big one was first noticed on September 1st.
      So there were in excess of 3 days warning.

      Not for the big one. Unless you have indication that big ones are always preceded by small ones and a significant fraction of the small ones is followed by big ones (or you've got a way to decide in advance whether a big one will follow).

      The first flare also caused enough disruption that telegraph didn't work, so in the modern era we would have been preparing for that one, long before the second one started.

      And then, after the first one happened, probably been going back to normal, because we had no idea that there's more to follow.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    19. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by icebike · · Score: 2

      Since you just practiced during the small one, and having history as your guide, 17 hours is plenty of time.

      Like I said, there was easily 3 days of warning.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    20. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by sjames · · Score: 1

      The only reason we get any warning at all is because people with more foresight than you understood that it is a serious matter. We do NOT yet have a proper protocol in place to have power companies take appropriate action in response to solar observations. That is, someone somewhere will see it coming, but he'll be that 'crank' that officials at the power company are busy ignoring. Or worse, they'll decide he must be a terrorist that wants to trick them into shutting the grid down.

    21. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by sjames · · Score: 1

      Over reacting *IS* just as bad or worse than under reacting in many cases.

    22. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Over reacting *IS* just as bad or worse than under reacting in many cases.

      That was my point - but apparently my message got muddled.

    23. Re:About as much damage as Y2K by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Even the best satellite cannot watch an event before it happens.

      Most if not all CME's are preceded by optical, X-Ray, and/or gamma ray bursts that travel at the speed of light and arrive within about 8.5 minutes. We can get a good idea of the strength of the CME from that, and an idea of its direction from where the burst occurred on the sun.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  3. *AHEM* by Chas · · Score: 0

    Dooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!

    We is all gonna die?

    *Rolleyes*

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:*AHEM* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!

      We is all gonna die?

      Let's hope so.

    2. Re:*AHEM* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, an environmentalist. BTW, it's not customary to announce your true goal outright.

    3. Re:*AHEM* by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, according to past evidence, yes, we all gonna die. However probably not all at the same time.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:*AHEM* by 32771 · · Score: 1

      If DOOM happened and say 1billion died, only one in 7 would be gone. Would you even notice it all that much? I mean even some big event taking a billion of people away would be a major catastrophe and yet we could go on without noticing the real impact. (Seeing piles of dead people in the news isn't real impact). With a little bit of doom you could still justify your view - remarkable.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    5. Re:*AHEM* by aled · · Score: 1

      Astronomical events could do that easily. For example a big asteroid collision, direct hit by long gamma ray burst, change in (supposedly) cosmical constants and others.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
    6. Re:*AHEM* by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You might have noted the little word "probably" in my post. I've put it there for a reason. And that reason was not that it sounds nice.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:*AHEM* by aled · · Score: 1

      You might note that in any way I tried to correct your post. Just pointing to plausible causes for simultaneous global extinction. I was going for +1 informative.
      BTW "probably" sounded good IMHO.

      --

      "I think this line is mostly filler"
  4. Infrequent by NonSequor · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Carrington Event caused aurora borealis to be visible around the world. I'm not aware of anything else like that being reported in recorded human history. Even if it had happened before the development of writing, you would think it would be the sort of thing that would have a major impact on legends across all world cultures. So my best guess is that from the span of time from, let's say, 3000BC to 2013AD, this has happened exactly once.

    Wikipedia says that ice core studies show that events like this which produce high energy protons comparable to the Carrington Event occur with a frequency of roughly once every 500 years, however it briefly mentions that these other events aren't necessarily comparable in terms of geomagnetic impact.

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    1. Re:Infrequent by VitaminB52 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      'Once every 500 years' is not equal to 'with 500 years interval'. The next Carrington Event could be tomorrow.

      Worse, even events less powerful than the Carrington Event occur more frequently than the Carrington Event and can cause significant damage to our high voltage infrastructure.

    2. Re:Infrequent by Artifakt · · Score: 2

      Scientists have a pretty good estimate for how common Supernovas are, but that number does not match well with how many were reported in history. We know that the Chinese observed at least one supernova that nobody in Europe bothered to write down. There's evidence suggesting that a lot of the 'plague of this, plague of that' events in Exodus are concurrent with a massive volcanic eruption on the isle of Santorini and that the Egyptians were, at the very least, informed about this eruption by traders, but if so, it's not in any official Egyptian record (and you think it would have been to their advantage, if only to counter any claims by their ex-slaves that all the Egyptian gods had just had their asses kicked by something called Yahweh).
              Yes, you would think somebody should have recorded an event like the Carrington auroras, but we do have examples where a large and well developed culture seems to have just stuck their fingers in their ears and ignored the whole plague of miracles/mind-numbing-problem/disaster/end of the world/whatever till it went away. This seems to be exactly the thing the phrase "Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence." was coined for. Your best guess is 'once', mine is 'once, baring something weird that seems to happen more than you'ld think, when humans are involved'.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    3. Re:Infrequent by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even if it had happened before the development of writing, you would think it would be the sort of thing that would have a major impact on legends across all world cultures. So my best guess is that from the span of time from, let's say, 3000BC to 2013AD, this has happened exactly once.

      Okay, first off, if we're talking about legends and mythology, there's enough ambiguity about all sorts of tales that have to do with sky phenomena or gods/heroes/whatever who interact with stuff in the sky that there could very well be accounts buried somewhere in those mythical stories... we just can't separate them out from all of the other weirdness.

      Even among Norse mythology, where you'd expect at least some significant discussion of aurora phenomena given where they lived, historians aren't even sure what -- if anything -- may be referencing auroras in those legends.

      And if we're talking about recorded history, there are a lot of "lights in the sky" kind of events, with Chinese records in particular going back thousands of years. Figuring out whether such things could be supernovas or comets or perhaps auroras is often not easy -- descriptions can be ambiguous. And events that were visible globally often weren't recorded with the same detail -- for example, the Chinese clearly record the apparently significant appearance in 1054 C.E. of the supernova that has led to the Crab Nebula, but I don't think anyone has found a clear reference to that in European astronomical records.

      In sum, whether we're talking about history or pre-history, there's plenty of stuff that went on up in the sky, and plenty of stories about it. But I don't think we can come anywhere close to saying for certain that no one observed unusual auroras or whatever due to some event like this in the entire history of civilization.

    4. Re:Infrequent by khallow · · Score: 1

      Yes, you would think somebody should have recorded an event like the Carrington auroras, but we do have examples where a large and well developed culture seems to have just stuck their fingers in their ears and ignored the whole plague of miracles/mind-numbing-problem/disaster/end of the world/whatever till it went away.

      Or a subsequent pharaoh scrubbed that record clean because it wasn't his plagues and miracles.

    5. Re:Infrequent by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      Joshua 10:13

      So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped, till the nation avenged itself on its enemies, as it is written in the Book of Jashar. The sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day.

      It is not impossible that oral tradition changes an event where it was bright enough to read at night into an event where the sun was shining all night.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Infrequent by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      The next Carrington Event could be tomorrow.

      No it can't, sorry.

      NOAA forecasters estimate a 40% chance of polar geomagnetic storms on July 13th when a CME is expected to hit Earth's magnetic field. Computer models of the incoming CME anticipate a sharp increase in solar wind plasma density around the time of the crossing. This could spark bright auroras at high latitudes.

      Sorry, there were no ejections in our direction three-four days ago, much less direct on of higher intensity that will hit tomorrow, or the day after, or the day after that.

      Granted, after that... But it's not like it will hit out of the blue, we'll have half a week warning, and it's not like this is new news, this is history that has been expected/known about for a long time now, regardless of splitting hairs of frequency description, in some matter of time it's possible.

    7. Re:Infrequent by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Possibly a supernova event, somewhat nearby (astronomically speaking, where nearby could be pretty far out)? The amount of radiation that would put out could light up the sky for some time. And it's not like people of that age had the equipment (solar filter) to look directly at the sun...the earth would continue rotating, as it usually does, but the continued light in the heavens would convince an earlier peoples that the sun must still be directly above them, because all light comes from the sun, or so it was believed in that age. We now know that a supernova, a distant event, is so catastrophically powerful, that it can not only bombard us with significant radiation, but also, if it's waaaay too close, strip the Earth of all life in a single instant.

      And of course, as now, as in times past, when anything goes awry, people think it's a sign from their gods to go kill the other people who do not think like them, or to conduct a purge of the people who have not followed various social laws closely enough, or whatever. When it floods, it's a sign from their gods that they need to fight the people of the plains; when a volcano explodes, it's a sign that they need to fight the people of the mountains; when a new star is seen rising, it's a sign that their gods want them to fight the people of the sea; and when an old star disappears, it's a sign that their gods want them to fight the people of the hills. In other words, whenever there is any deviation from the static model of the world contained within these people's minds, they panic, assume they've done something wrong, or that something is amiss, and use the confusion as a cloak to launch an attack. Tiresome, really. A smarter approach is to remove yourself, and your people from any immediate danger (flood waters rising? let's go hang out on the higher plains for a bit, catch up with relatives, until they recede; and try not to look like an invading army...), and see if the problem persists.

      'Tis amazing that we have all this knowledge, of where floods are likely, and so on, and yet due to corruption and graft, never actually get around to installing storm walls or better levies to deal with those floods.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    8. Re:Infrequent by lightknight · · Score: 0

      I'm going to add to this: part of the fun of a supernova is that with the amount of radiation being put out on all frequencies and in such great quantities, is that it would swamp the local star system. I mean, the moon itself, when reflecting that kind of radiation, might look as bright as the sun. What more, since it's swamping everything...it's not necessarily line of sight; i.e. the supernova might be coming in at one angle, but there is just so much radiation, playing with the gravity of our own sun, moon, and other planets / bodies, that it actually gets bent around a bit. What is gravitational lensing?

      Or it could be a quasar, or a regular nova, or so on. Lots of astronomical phenomena that fit the profile.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    9. Re:Infrequent by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, based on conjecture it was a unique event, but you then say that based on actual science it is a 500 year event, so why bother with the conjecture at all?

      At the time of the Carrington event there were various tribes that weren't in contact with the modern world, but are now. How many of them have a legend or belief based on the Carrington event? I am aware of none but would be interested if there are any you know of.

    10. Re:Infrequent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of which would fry all life on Earth.

    11. Re:Infrequent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stars similar to our Sun have been observed to produce flares/CMEs with a total energy output of between 100 and 10 MILLION times anything ever observed from our own Sun. That would not only knock out your power grid, but most likely resurface the whole planet with ion etching, dielectric heating, ohmic heating, EMP shock metamorphosis, and other EM/plasma processes. The fractal-like river patters obvious from space based Earth observations suggest electro-static discharge.
      All of presently accepted geological processes supposedly involving millions of years of slow change through erosion and weathering may well have been produced in minutes or hours by extreme energy bombardment of our, and other soloar system planets by a most likely spherical mega-CME.
      "And the priest replied: "You are young in soul, every one of you. For therein you possess not a single belief that is ancient and derived from old tradition, nor yet one science that is hoary with age. And this is the cause thereof: There have been, and there will be, many and diverse destructions of mankind, of which the greatest are by fire and water, and lesser ones by countless other means. For in truth the story that is told in your country as well as ours, how once upon a time. Phaethon, son of Helios, yoked his father's chariot and, because he was unable to drive it along the course taken by his father burnt up all that was upon the earth, and himself perished by a thunderbolt - that story, as it is told, has the fashion of a legend, but the truth of it lies in the occurrence of a shift of the bodies in the heavens which move round the earth and a destruction of the things on the earth by fierce fire, which recurs at long intervals."

    12. Re:Infrequent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it never happened. There is no evidence of any mass migration from Egypt to Canaan. Also, archaelogical evidence reveals that the pyramids were built by a remunerated Egyptian working class. Still, before there was a kingdom of Judea or a kingdom of Israel, the region was part of the Egyptian empire - Canaanites did at one point live under Egyptian rule, but they did so in Canaan. By the time the embellishments of oral Torah were written down, a strong kingdom (Kings "Saul", "David", etc.) was growning in Canaan. The justification for its existence and expansion was provided by the propaganda piece, "Exodus".

  5. Some Background Information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  6. In Quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In Quebec, they make as much use of hydroelectric power generated on northern rivers as they can. They use it for normal uses of electricity, but also for heat (where you might use natural gas or heating oil otherwise). They carry it over long distances by way of large (somewhat unsightly) power pylons/transmission towers. Acting as a wonderful antenna, these exposed, unshielded power conduits are exposed to solar radiation, and also ice (see ice storm, 1998). If you have a localized source of power, you will not likely notice the affects as much.

  7. Fuses by iamacat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or we could start protecting our central power infrastructure the same way most homes are protected - by having it switch off rather than blow up when overloaded for any reason.

    1. Re:Fuses by sphealey · · Score: 2

      Brilliant! Why haven't the grid operators thought of that one?!?

      sPh

      Of course, large power transformers can be damaged by electromagnetic storms even when fully disconnected from the grid...

    2. Re:Fuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure this would be politically possible. Consider the response of others on this thread wrt the Y2K, and how they would respond to losing power or a few hours or a day because the power was deliberately shut off.

    3. Re:Fuses by fnj · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course, large power transformers can be damaged by electromagnetic storms even when fully disconnected from the grid...

      Bull.

    4. Re:Fuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what happened in Quebec in 89, it wasn't power outage due to damage, but a power outage due to breakers tripping. Once the mess was cleared up, it was mostly a matter of turning things back on, and not replacing large amounts of equipment.

    5. Re:Fuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it already happened, as in the case already citing in Quebec was due to breakers tripping...

    6. Re:Fuses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy clearly knows what he's talking about.

    7. Re:Fuses by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Not if they have internal breakers that can split up coils into multiple regions if damaging current is detected.

  8. Known problem, already dealt with. by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative

    The last time someone got wound up about this on Slashdot. And, last time around, I linked the PJM power grid training document on geo-magnetic disturbances. They know about the Carrington Event. They know all about the problem in 1989, which happened on their system and damaged some transformers.

    The problem shows up as DC current on long AC lines, because voltage at "ground" differs across points hundreds of miles apart. This can damage transformers. So they have DC current monitoring in place at some key points on their system. Corrective action is taken when "DC measurement of 10 amps or greater measured at Missouri Avenue in Atlantic City and/or Meadow Brook Station near Winchester Virginia". Some long-distance lines have to operate at reduced capacity. Some generating plants are told to reduce output. Others have to crank up to compensate.

    Medium sized disturbances of this type happen a few times a year (more at the high point of the sunspot cycle). Only one warning so far this year, on June 29th. April 11, 2010 was the most recent disturbance event that required that action be taken. The warning came in from NOAA's Space Weather Center, and people in power grid control centers (the US has seven) reconfigured the power grid to prepare for it.

    1. Re:Known problem, already dealt with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Go away! Logic and rational thinking has no place on slashdot!

    2. Re:Known problem, already dealt with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would DC long distance power transmission (instead of AC) be more tolerant to geo-magnetic disturbances?

    3. Re:Known problem, already dealt with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story is based on the recent Weather Channel "Space Weather" episode that basically is quoted verbatim.

      This is also a classic example of the confusion in the public and media with what scientists do and know with what engineers do and know. The show is clearly and obviously only advised by scientists. Nothing wrong with that per se if it's just about the science of space. BUT when it starts to talk about infrastructure that generally scientists 1) know nothing about, and 2) had nothing to do with the invention, design or creation of, you get scurrilous and idiot claims of what can happen (usually ignorantly extreme and apocalyptic)!!

      Similar clap-trap can be see in other "Space Weather" episodes. And of course you see this with stuff like "EMP will electrocute you if you are holding a cell phone" or "EMP will destroy all cars (and electronics)". Mostly physicists who have no practical knowledge about current technology and its implementations of technology to usually have a clue.

    4. Re:Known problem, already dealt with. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It's "not already dealt with". The power grid is a minor part of infrastructure at this point.

      There were a couple M class storms two years ago. We mentioned them to our manager (we work for a small MSP) and told him that precautions should be made to not a) put ourselves into more risky situations (specifically on those days) and that we should anticipate higher failure rates of old equipment in the weeks following a strong storm.

      He ignored us, of course, but we did notice a noticeably higher equipment failure rate in the next month. One customer had his old backup server go down and wasn't able to recover off the tapes from the past month, either, due to 'bitrot'. Now, magnify this significantly for a truly bad storm, something where you're seeing northern lights at the equator. How much data would be lost? How many companies would be impacted severely?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  9. think big by tloh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Understandably, the later half of the article talks about current solutions utilities and governments are considering to protect the infrastructure. However, let us just suppose for a moment that we are a type I civilization on the Kardashev scale. What type of conceptual solutions could be used to protect the whole planet instead of just small patches of people?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:think big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I thought we are a Type 13 planet doomed to self-destruction?

      Love,
        - 790

    2. Re:think big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't. Same story with GRBs.

    3. Re:think big by khallow · · Score: 1

      What type of conceptual solutions could be used to protect the whole planet instead of just small patches of people?

      Lots of spare parts. Make a grid that can shut down safely under the loading from such solar flares. The more I read of this, the more overblown I think the concerns are.

  10. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by hendrikboom · · Score: 2

    I lieved in Montreal during that blackout. The weather was fine that evening. I turned the power off on my computer (in case the power came on flaky) and went for a walk. A block or so away there was someone who had decided to sit on hos porch with a guitar. Several of us gathered around to listen.
    Much later I went to bed. In the dark, natch.
    It wasn't much of a problem for me, no.

    But if it has been longer, and in midwinter, it would have been a problem.

    Come to think of it, I've lived through such an event, too.

    The ice storm of 1998. I missed the actual storm (I was in Oxford at the time), but I came home to the aftermath.The 9 centimetres of ice on everything had made power lines too heavy to support themselves, and the long-distance lines were out. I came home to a dark city. I called my wife from the airport on arrival (the phone system was still working -- there was still some power, but it had been directed to essential services, such as phones and hospitals.). The family had been forced out of the house by intense cold -- although we had an oil furnace, it turned out that the actual thermostat and burner used electricity to ignite the oil. Useless.
      We were out of the house in an emergency shelter at a local hospital.

    Now that was for a power outage of about ten days in the city. Electricity workers from the entire continent were flown in to repair the electrical systems. Some parts of Quebec were without power for about a month -- effectively evacuated into emergency shelters of various kinds.

    I'm not sure the shelter system would have been sustainable for the six months expected from a serious solar storm. That one in 1989 was tiny compared with the one in 1859. Another one like the 1859 one could well occur this century. And we wouldn't be able to fly specialized emergency workers in from the whole continent. Every place will have its own problems to deal with.

    Back in 1859 our technology was much less vulnerable. It's different now, and we should be trying to design such vulnerabilities out or our infrastructure as we continue to upgrade it in a relentless adoption of newer and newer technologies.

    It's not just a nine-hour problem we may have to deal with.

    -- hendrik

  11. OMG Sharknado! by istartedi · · Score: 2

    From SPACE!!! Alienado. I'm not just going to sit here and write about it. I'm going to throw bombs into space.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  12. Most precious item during such a cataclysm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is having a gun with sufficient ammo to protect yourself. After 1 week when panic really starts to hit and riots occur people will become like immoral wild beasts scavenging every bit of drinkable water, edible food and burnable fuel. Let's pray this never happens, ...

    1. Re:Most precious item during such a cataclysm ... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      wrong (and I'm a firearms hobbyist / gun nut)

      Most important things:
      1. water
      2. food
      3. protection from elements (shelter, clothing)
      4. tools including weapons

    2. Re:Most precious item during such a cataclysm ... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      One of my neighbors is kinda of a minor league "prepper" he's got water and ramen noodles and... some other stuff... who knows. Anyways, he was over one day and I was cleaning my pistol... he doesn't like guns much and was telling me it would never do me much good. I asked "what about the disaster you're always getting ready for?" He went on to tell me a gun wouldn't do me any good, I'd need food water, etc... what good were bullets when I was starving. I asked "Couldn't I just use my gun to shoot you and take your food since you're unarmed?" He just frowned and left. Now his food stores are top secret, he doesn't brag about them anymore. Which is awesome really.

    3. Re:Most precious item during such a cataclysm ... by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      ah yes, Dilbert "the prepper" vs. Alice (ex navy seal with weapons and expertise in using them) http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2011-07-31/

      funny people ridicule "prepper", that just means being prepared for problems and 50+ years ago was normal family thinking. Having supplies for three days is smart, city water could shut down or severe cold snap after blizzard could burst mains so nothing crazy about that. Once you have three days, why not go for a week's supply, again handy for blizzard or hurricane (miss the inevitable rush in the stores right before).

      Hopefully mad-max scenario never strikes near you, but if it does here's something to ponder.

        most "preppers" are not like the ones in your story, they have nice powerful guns that they practice with and also have early warning system of the family dog. a thief/raider has odds against them unless in an organized group. in the case of attack by semi-organized or organized group the trick is to observe and identify the "ringleaders", then take them out. this works in riot situation too, there will be clusters of people egged on by "ringleaders".

      But organization works in the favor of being prepared too, if you are friendly and helpful to your neighbors and know they are prepared too, you can work together and defend and help each other as community rather than every man or household for itself. civilization and civility that stands up under disaster is a good thing.

  13. You see, kids? by bytesex · · Score: 1

    'Telegraphs in Philadelphia were spitting out âoefantastical and unreadable messages,â'

    That's why, today, we have error correction.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:You see, kids? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      'Telegraphs in Philadelphia were spitting out âoefantastical and unreadable messages,â'

      That's why, today, we have error correction.

      Except for Slashdot posts, obviously. ;-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:You see, kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, I just read an article that says we no longer have Telegraphs in operation. We are all safe.

      Now, i have to get back to watching Doomsday Preppers and inventorying my ramen noodles.

    3. Re:You see, kids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Telegraphs in Philadelphia were spitting out âoefantastical and unreadable messages,â'

      That's why, today, we have error correction.

      Too bad we can't all agree on a character set.

  14. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a kid back the ice storm and I have fond memories of those nine days without showers. We were locked inside the house forced to play monopoly and eats fondues bourguignonne every night.

  15. Don't worry. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    “We’re much more dependent on electricity now than we were in 1859,” explains Neil Smith, an emerging-risks researcher at Lloyd’s and co-author of the report. “The same event today could have a huge financial impact” — which the insurer pegs at up to $2.6 trillion for an especially severe storm. (To put that in context, Hurricane Sandy caused about $68 billion in damage.)

    (To put that in context, $2.6 trillion is about two years worth of federal borrowing. So in other words, don't sweat it. Congress won't bat an eye heaving it onto the debt.)

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  16. Wait a tick... by Mashiki · · Score: 0

    Is this the same Lloyds of London that said in 2007 that for businesses "climate change would be the highest output cost for policies and collection?" Fast forward to today, where piracy is a higher issue along with 23 other items.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
    1. Re:Wait a tick... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Fast forward to today, where piracy is a higher issue along with 23 other items.

      Piracy as in copying movies, or piracy as in forcefully boarding ships?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  17. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    Landlines are powered from the exchange. All exchanges have backup batteries and generators for just that situation - because in an emergency, you really want the phones to work so the injured can call 911.

    It could become a serious concern with the loss of landlines in favor of cellphone and VoIP though. The infrastructure for those is much more distributed, and generally doesn't have much in the way of backup power. It's not practical to put a generator in every street cabinet and base station - those generators need regular inspections and maintenance.

  18. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you had basic necessities, such as heat. Without that my place became unlivable.

    And did you have a huge stock of nonspoiling food? Or did you have the miracle of an accessible functinoing groceryy store?

    -- hendrik

  19. Why is it called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a CARRINGTON Event?

    The article talked about everything except this? Is it something to do with Dynasty?

    1. Re:Why is it called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From NASA:

      The strongest geomagnetic storm on record is the Carrington Event of August-September 1859, named after British astronomer Richard Carrington who witnessed the instigating solar flare with his unaided eye while he was projecting an image of the sun on a white screen.

    2. Re:Why is it called... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      From Wikipedia (emphasis by me):

      The solar storm of 1859, also known as the 1859 Solar Superstorm,[1] or the Carrington Event,[2] was a powerful geomagnetic solar storm in 1859 during solar cycle 10. A solar flare and/or coronal mass ejection produced a solar storm which hit Earth's magnetosphere and induced the largest known geomagnetic solar storm, which was observed and recorded by Richard C. Carrington.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  20. When the Ozone is Full of Clouds and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The highways are full of google-map guided computerized cars, the skies, at least around air-terminals, being already filled with radio and radar and computer-generated heads-up instrument displays dependent airplanes, then we will be ready for the earth to fly through a typhoonicane class geomagnetic storm. The best effects will be on human minds, which can't seem to stay on the rails even when they aren't being blown by geomagnetic squallings and electrical storms.

  21. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    I arrived at the airport, which was powered with emergency power, and tried calling my wife on my cellphone. Apparently cell phones still worked at the airport, because I reached my wife, who turned out to be at an emergency shelter at the hospital, which also had some kind of emergency power (she's a doctor there).

    The first I really knew about the ice storm was in the newsreels on the flight from Heathrow, where I say huge hydro towers falling over one after another like dominos.

    -- hendrik

  22. Re:OMG 9 hour... I'm ready are u ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Before Y2K and after seeing War of the Worlds a few times I knew it was time to be ready for space dangers. Now I'm ready with lots of tin-foil covering the house attached to a grounding rod. A few hundred pounds of ramen noodles and a canary bird to warn if gas. Bring it on!

  23. Attack of the Space Weather by sanman2 · · Score: 1

    We are canceling the space weather apocalypse!

    Switch on the GlaDOS!

    1. Re:Attack of the Space Weather by lessthan · · Score: 1

      Ha! That is the only reason I saw that movie. GlaDOS in giant killer robots, nothing could possibly go wrong with that...

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
  24. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    The grocery store isn't the main problem (assuming it has enough food of the right type -- that is, not needing to be cooled -- on stock). You don't need any technology to exchange money for food, and hopefully the people working there haven't yet forgotten how to add numbers without having an electronic cash desk helping them (they also might have pocket calculators with working batteries, or even solar powered ones, to do that). Getting new food delivered will be a problem, but that will take a longer time to surface (assuming the grocery store applies good selling guidelines so that the supplies are not quickly bought off by hoarders).

    Of course if you don't have that cash, you're doomed. Because your credit card won't work without electricity. Nor the ATMs. And since most probably your bank has no longer a paper record of your account and the computers are not working, even personally showing up at your bank won't help.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  25. Satellites Destroyed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A solar storm similar to the one in 1859 would wipe out every satellite in orbit, including GPS, weather, communications, internet, etc. That is considerably worse then just losing power for a few days or months. We have already had solar storms that have taken out several satellites permanently and damaged others, and these were relatively minor storms compared to the 1859 storm. It would probably disrupt the Van Allen Radiation belt with other more serious effects.

  26. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by Stormin · · Score: 1

    Having lived through various natural disasters that caused electrical power to be out for many days, I've found the situation to be workable if there is somewhere nearby that still has power. It can be very inconvenient, but if you can get somewhere nearby that has power it lets you solve most of the problems you run into. (The house I grew up in had a wood stove for backup heat in just that type of situation.)

    An event that caused serious damage to any number of substation transformers would be a totally different story, if it mean that there was no electricity for even say, a 100 mile radius. This past winter I watched them replace a substation transformer near my house. It took them more than three months to do it - a failure impacting a number of those units would be a big problem.

  27. actual evidence by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    So I work for a telco, and I used to work in the NOC. I got all the alarms for all the equipment all over the country and would call out techs to fix it or fix it myself when there was a problem. After a particularly bad day a few years back I read that there had been some elevated solar activity that day. We always knew that solar activity effected our equipment, after all our giant nationwide network was basically a huge copper net for all those stray electrons. But I realized that now I had a large dataset to play with.

    To my surprise there was actually a NASA space weather website with large datasets you could download that would show solar output over time. So I dumped all this into a database along with logs of our alarms. Without getting into all the details of it, I found that we indeed did have spikes when solar activity went up but there were other spikes as well. Realizing our #1 cause of equipment alarm or failure was electrical storms, I then filtered out all alarms that were resolved as "Storm related" by the repair tech and re-ran my report. There, clear as day were 2 graph lines that were very similar in their trajectory. Solar activity and our alarm activity. It wasn't perfect but I'm no research scientist but it was compelling enough that I took this to my boss, very excited. He was impressed "That's really cool!" I was giddy... then he looked up and said "well?" and I was like "Huh" and which point he made the obvious point that I had missed in my excitement "there is absolutely nothing we can do about this. You just wasted several hours of your time... it's still really cool though!"

    Ah well... but it is a fact, solar activity has a direct impact on copper networking equipment. Even our fiber optic networks had an increase in alarms, I suspect because the routers and such are metal and plugged into the electrical grid.

  28. Solar Physics naming schemes .. by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    Carrington Event : ~ August 28, 1859 to ~Sept 2, 1869
    Bastile Day Event : ~July 14, 2000 to ~July 16, 2000
    Halloween Storms : ~October 19th, 2003 to ~Nov 7, 2003

    Of course, when someone says they 'studied the Halloween Storm', they might've only studied 7 days instead of the full 3 weeks.

    (disclaimer: I've been pushing for better data citation in the solar physics community for years ... this is one of my pet peeves)

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  29. Re:OMG 9 hours? 9 days? Half a year? by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

    I managed to get to a shelter. That made a huge difference. Getting to a place where there was heat was essential. I remember looking out of one of the shelter's windows, and seeing ice everywhere. Crystal trees. It was beautiful. But it was austere beauty, deadly to be stranded in.

    When the electricity came back I managed to be one of the first to get the plumbers in, as well as nine kilowatts of electric heaters. They managed to get the regular heating on after disconnecting two busted radiators. But it took ages before the hose was warm. I came down with hypothermia. If I had known the symptoms, I would have gotten out of there earlier. In case you need to know, before you die, you start t feel warm again, even though you are still cold. I was actually fooled into taking my coat off. I did finish a fair amount of clean-up but when I got back to my sister-in-law's apartment (they got electricity before we did) I had trouble walking I was so cold. It took me all night to get warm again.