Slashdot Mirror


Deutsche Telekom Moves Email Traffic In-Country In Wake of PRISM

kdryer39 writes "Germany's leading telecom provider announced on Friday that it will only use German servers to handle any email traffic over its systems, citing privacy concerns arising from the recent PRISM leak and its 'public outrage over U.S. spy programs accessing citizens' private messages.' In a related move, DT has also announced that they will be providing email services over SSL to further secure their customers' communications. Sandro Gaycken, a professor of cyber security at Berlin's Free University, said 'This will make a big difference...Of course the NSA could still break in if they wanted to, but the mass encryption of emails would make it harder and more expensive for them to do so.'"

180 comments

  1. This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

    1. Re:This makes sense by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

      The NSA will probably next be cornering the market on high GPU count graphics cards.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:This makes sense by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

      It makes somewhat less sense given that the US spies on Germany with considerable assistance from the German BND...

      I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

    3. Re:This makes sense by camperdave · · Score: 2

      The NSA will probably next be cornering the market on high GPU count graphics cards.

      I would think the NSA could afford to get proper task specific processing units instead of kludging together something on banks of repurposed NVIDIA hardware.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:This makes sense by GrilledFishTaco · · Score: 0

      It would be naive to think Germany isn't spying on the US

    5. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

      It makes somewhat less sense given that the US spies on Germany with considerable assistance from the German BND...

      I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

      Notice that they bitch about PRISM... but don't bother mentioning the UK's program, or any of the other monitoring programs run by various governments around the world. The US is hardly the only country doing it, but it's popular to bash on America and it draws attention away from their own spy programs. The purpose of "in-housing" the email is so it's easier for their own agencies to access.

    6. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Graphics cards are cheaper.

    7. Re:This makes sense by Fjandr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nvidia supercomputing clusters aren't "repurposed" for highly parallel tasks. That's what they're designed for. They don't just produce graphics cards.

    8. Re:This makes sense by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Graphics cards are cheaper.

      Since when did the government care about cost?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    9. Re:This makes sense by richlv · · Score: 1, Informative

      germans like to keep a short leash on their own, though. try to buy a usb modem with sim card - passport required. wifi at a hotel ? username and password you have to sign for.
      fuck you germany, you are no better despite the fuss angela might throw.

      --
      Rich
    10. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is your point? It is established that the US does a shitload of spying on Germany. From the point of view of a German company, what should they do?

      Stop obfuscating and being an apologist for evil shit. And practice reading comprehension, my friend.

    11. Re:This makes sense by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The purpose of "in-housing" the email is so it's easier for their own agencies to access.

      Soooo.....why did they enable ssl? - Hardware sales for a relative in the business?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    12. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spying on the government or military forces of another country is indeed expected from almost any country, spying on civilians is not. That's why the world is pissed at the US.

    13. Re:This makes sense by icebike · · Score: 2

      They care about lead time.

      You can order a truck load of off the shelf cards and have them at your bunker tomorrow.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nonsense, all they have to do is setup some dummy site with some scientific information on it, like it's a bunch of researchers looking for aliens (seti@home) or looking for cures to cancer, etc... and a cute little graphic screensaver client or something people can look at to make them 'feel good' that they are doing 'something useful' - meanwhile it's really all NSA codebreaking that's really going on, and they have one heck of a supercomputer for free (or very little cost).

    15. Re:This makes sense by icebike · · Score: 2

      I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

      Yes, at best it sounds like the NSA will have to get get the data from the BND. Big deal! Looks more pre-packaged and easier to handle if you ask me.

      Also the summary has this nugget:

      Of course the NSA could still break in if they wanted to, but the mass encryption of emails would make it harder and more expensive for them to do so.'"

      Except that we all know that SSL protects traffic from one place to another, but not as the email sits on the mail servers. So one tap into their server farm and all the SSL in the world won't help, because its stored in cleartext.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:This makes sense by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

      SSL is enabled by flipping a switch, but it offers no real protection when some three letter agency can surf your mail server farm with their fiber back door.

      There is a lot of posturing going on in that article.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    17. Re:This makes sense by stenvar · · Score: 2

      SSL doesn't even offer protection for transmission against the German government, given that the certificates are issued by Telekom itself.

    18. Re:This makes sense by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You can order a truck load of off the shelf cards and have them at your bunker tomorrow.

      It doesnt work like that.

      If you want tens of thousands of video cards, you are going to have to make a deal with a manufacturer.. contracts are involved.. delivery dates of more than a few months will apply..

      This is exactly what the big distributors do. First they hunt down a lot of small contracts (retail outlets that want anywhere from dozens to a thousand), so that they can make a large multi-thousand unit contract deal with a manufacturer.

      There is no way in hell that you could have a truck load of video cards delivered to your door tomorrow. Now stop being a naive dipshit that doesnt know how business works.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    19. Re:This makes sense by icebike · · Score: 1

      How many do you think Best Buy has in their warehouses nation wide and In their stores?
      Toss in Wallmart, NewEgg, and amazon all the other major net sellers. How many of them will turn down your purchase order?

      Toss in Dell, and HP, maybe even Asus and Lenovo. With enough money they will cough up another month in delivery time to customers and ship you all the video cards they have in stock. (Thousands).

      Stop being a small company purchasing agent, and understand that the government get get as many video cards as they could possibly use in way shorter time than they could order a custom card loaded with custom cards.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    20. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol told.

    21. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Notice that they bitch about PRISM... but don't bother mentioning the UK's program, or any of the other monitoring programs run by various governments around the world. The US is hardly the only country doing it, but it's popular to bash on America and it draws attention away from their own spy programs. The purpose of "in-housing" the email is so it's easier for their own agencies to access.

      Ahhh...the "but everyone else is doing it" defense. If everyone else is doing it, then it must be okay for the US to do it. My teenage daughter tries to use that excuse all the time, and she doesn't get away with it.

    22. Re:This makes sense by camperdave · · Score: 1

      They care about lead time.

      You can order a truck load of off the shelf cards and have them at your bunker tomorrow.

      And then what? Put them into a motherboard with 10,000 PCI slots? And even if they did that, GPUs are optimized for graphics. Codebreaking uses entirely different mathematics than frame rendering. No, the NSA would be using custom APUs, not off the shelf graphics cards.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    23. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you lived in a cave for the past five years? GPUs are where it's at for hashing algorithms. A thousand SIMD cores with a generic instruction set to perform all sorts of math? The only thing that could do better right now is if you designed the ASIC yourself.

    24. Re:This makes sense by Nutria · · Score: 1

      spying on civilians is not.

      That's delusional, since it assumes that only other governments do things that interest the ones doing the spying.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    25. Re:This makes sense by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Now stop being a naive dipshit that doesnt know how business works.

      HEY!

      Over here we use you insensitive clod!

      You insensitive clod!

    26. Re:This makes sense by aliquis · · Score: 0

      I was thinking about typing how a math professor once told me lickling my balls cut the time it took to solve a mathematical problem by a factor of 2^1337 and how ___ (enter your favorite spying/intelligence gathering agency here) maybe should try that.

      But then I would be lying.

      I was going to suggest that over in the real free world sending e-mails in plain text was still enough because like, it was free.. But then I googled free world to see whatever it actually meant what I thought it meant and found this:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_World

      Guess it didn't.

      What are you calling it when you're not being spied upon by your government or whomever? Dead? Fantasy? =P

    27. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Germany is one of the hotspots for Boundless Informant. It appears that the US spies on Germany as much as it does on China.

      It makes somewhat less sense given that the US spies on Germany with considerable assistance from the German BND...

      I can understand why Germans would Not want their emails passing through American control; but it looks like they'll have to clean house if they want to be able to do that just by going domestic.

      Did you even read the article to which you refer? It specifically talks about how the Germany's BND is making sure not to spy on German citizens and that only 2 data sets pertaining to German citizens were ever passed on.

      I know this is hard to believe coming from the US, but in Germany, breaking the law generally does have consequences. The G-10 law specifically prohibits spying on citizens, and people (not all of them, but the vast majority) tend - unlike in the US - be interested in actually following the law.

    28. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that they bitch about PRISM... but don't bother mentioning the UK's program, or any of the other monitoring programs run by various governments around the world. The US is hardly the only country doing it, but it's popular to bash on America and it draws attention away from their own spy programs. The purpose of "in-housing" the email is so it's easier for their own agencies to access.

      When the US stops spying, then i'll listen to your sob story. Until then, the US intelligence agencies can't be trusted and your comment is just a deflection.

      And just in case you missed it, they are passing the data through "German servers only" - which deals with the UK by default.

    29. Re:This makes sense by Mashiki · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want tens of thousands of video cards, you are going to have to make a deal with a manufacturer.

      Yeah...no. If I wanted 5000-10000 video cards tomorrow, I'd call up Ingram Micro and say "this is what I want" and they'd get me X pricing per-unit in bulk(orders over 6k units get special pricing). I *have* ordered quantities of things like HDD's, and videocards in the 2500-5000 unit range in the last decade. I couldn't have 8000 cards tomorrow, but I could have every videocard in every warehouse that they own in North America for me in three days, expedited.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    30. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Told a bunch of bs, but yes, indeed, he was told it.

    31. Re:This makes sense by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If you are the military or a an intelligence agency, professionally paranoid, likely living in fear if Electron Magnetic Pulse, either generated by human activity of solar activity, how many spare parts for your computer system would you carry, 100% total replacement or as you think none?

      More encryption slows down everything enormously, not only that but, ohh look, they will have less money to do it with' Reducing US computer business revenue, reduced tax base and who are they going to blame for the lost 'BILLIONS OF DOLLARS' and what are they going to do with their budget. Basically the message has gone out, absolutely do not host your data in the US,even if you are a US company and especially if you are not.

      You can fully expect the next equivalent of secret Swiss Banks, new government regulation protected secret servers, so which countries will become the new Government gauranteed secured data centres of the world.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    32. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to think of it - if gov does things like that in order to 'increase security' and breaks basic assumptions of its accountability and common sense as well as violates privacy on massive scale then the only thing that a citizen can do against it is to use violence to oppose the assholes. If that is so then the actual idea of introducing this privacy violating 'security' works like self fulfilling prophecy - give us more power to eavesdrop and control every aspect of your lives because there are people that dislike it and the only way they can be successful is overthrowing the government. It is even better than war on drugs and other such silly shit costing people lives and taxpayers money with only one effect - some small group of people get quite some power.

      If t hat is so then maybe it is time to go for the old fashioned raf methods?

    33. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which confirms the programmes are mainly about industrial espionage.

    34. Re:This makes sense by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      I have never had that problem in Germany but I can imagine where a hotel which had that policy is coming from.
      The previous government implemented a law where you can get an "Abmahnung" (cease and desist, you have to pay the lawyers' real or imagined costs) if you have indulged in illegal file-sharing. There is no burden of proof. I got one a couple of years back for allegedly distributing some porno.
      I immediately got a lawyer on to it and defused it a bit but a couple of things came out.

      • It does not matter if it was you or not if they claim it was your access-point. That applies even if a Trojan was responsible (unless you can finger the people responsible) or someone cracked your Wifi connection.
      • They absolutely do not care if the allegations are correct or not.

      My Wifi was and is WPA2 with a 63-byte random upper/lowercase string as a key. I used a bootable CD virus scanner and made sure there was no trojan.
      I *was* online at the time they claimed but assume they asked for the wrong ip-address or the wrong time. I decided I had the wrong ISP and left T-Online.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    35. Re:This makes sense by nosfucious · · Score: 2

      Dell, et al, does not have thousands in stock. Dell, and I imagine all other manufacturers, has at most, a few days worth of stock.

      That isn't thousands. That's way to much inventory.

      For a major manufacturer like Dell, suppliers often set up nearby stocking warehouses. Only single truck or a few small trucks work the route (could be a even forklift worth at a time).

      Inventory requires space and management. Space is money. Management is money. All money that could be profits. The hoy grail here is just having enough stock on hand to fullfil the next shifts worth of builds. Not a single one more.

      Off topic: This is why the big players get a great deal on real-estate and buildings in industrial parks. Because they bring in other tennants that will be there at nearly any price, just to be working with the key tennants.

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    36. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that they bitch about PRISM... but don't bother mentioning the UK's program, or any of the other monitoring programs run by various governments around the world. The US is hardly the only country doing it, but it's popular to bash on America and it draws attention away from their own spy programs.

      We've got a good amount of momentum going on PRISM and that's a good thing. Not so for these other programs. It sure seems like you're the one trying to deflect what momentum there is in fighting these programs, using the exact same technique that you are complaining about: bashing on the other countries to draw attention away from your country.

    37. Re:This makes sense by richlv · · Score: 1

      I have never had that problem in Germany but I can imagine where a hotel which had that policy is coming from.

      that's not a single hotel. that's all of them. you can also get free wifi in many cafes and fast food places across the europe... except germany.

      The previous government implemented a law where you can get an "Abmahnung" (cease and desist, you have to pay the lawyers' real or imagined costs) if you have indulged in illegal file-sharing. There is no burden of proof.

      yes, that is a likely primary reason. the result, of course, is complete loss of any anonymity online in germany. and they have the nerve to shun usa on spying :)

      --
      Rich
    38. Re:This makes sense by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If you want tens of thousands of video cards, you are going to have to make a deal with a manufacturer.. contracts are involved.. delivery dates of more than a few months will apply..

      Or you can have tens of thousands of agents walk into tens of thousands of shops and get one each, then send it to your headquarters.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    39. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the NSA data center in Bluffdale, Utah, they have AES-cracking clusters which use custom ASICs, not GPUs. As Wired reported back in 2012, the NSA has made some yet-undisclosed major advance in cryptanalysis against AES and that made it feasible for them to build the Bluffdale lab in 2006 specifically to crack AES128 messages on demand. AES256 appears to still be secure, though.

    40. Re:This makes sense by budgenator · · Score: 1

      With SSL they will not be able to tell on the fly whether the traffic is an email between two parties they are interested in or a cat video unless they are privy to the certs; increasing anonimity while not security does make it a little more expensive to crack.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    41. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Now stop being a naive dipshit that doesnt know how business works.

      At least he can stop being naive and learn how business works. OTOH you will always be a rude douche.

    42. Re:This makes sense by icebike · · Score: 1

      Unless they have access to the certs.

      Famous last words.

      You do realize that there are cases where federal authorities are demanding exactly that, right?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    43. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you're wrong about Germany. German culture places an incredibly high value on people's own right to privacy, and would have a problem if the UK was spying on them as well. Not really the same comparison saying "they don't complain about the UK's program"... which is spying on Germans? The fact that the EU CONSULATE's phone lines were tapped is part of what is so wrong here... that there is zero trust and a "get it all" mentality, amongst what were supposedly trusted allies. And (final point here), lots of US companies and services have have to significantly alter their way of doing things here (Germany) to account for the strict freedom / privacy that people are granted, Google StreetView amongst others included.

    44. Re:This makes sense by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      So if we can't block all surveillance programs everywhere simultaneously, we should just throw up our hands and give up?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    45. Re:This makes sense by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      Notice that they bitch about PRISM... but don't bother mentioning the UK's program, or any of the other monitoring programs run by various governments around the world. The US is hardly the only country doing it, but it's popular to bash on America and it draws attention away from their own spy programs. The purpose of "in-housing" the email is so it's easier for their own agencies to access.

      That's because the only people that were in the dark about the various spying programs are the citizens, and most of the Governments have a vested interest in keeping ALL of the programs secret. No country is going to risk the "wrath" of the others when (so far) it's just the whistleblowers actually getting into trouble.
       
       
      The only "solution" to avoid being tracked is to stay offline, stay off of the phone, and only conduct conversations face to face within a Faraday cage.

    46. Re:This makes sense by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      Let me know when we're able to block ONE surveillance program and we can start discussing the others.

  2. so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It has come to this

    1. Re:so.... by chilvence · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find it a beautiful irony that the country that invented the gestapo and the stasi finds the nsa a little bit too much :)

    2. Re:so.... by crutchy · · Score: 0

      Germany: "Heil Hitler!"
      USA: "I find your lack of faith disturbing... goh peh"
      Australia: "That's not a knife."
      Borg: "Resistance is futile"
      Canada: "Well, fuck my ass and call me a bitch."

    3. Re:so.... by chilvence · · Score: 3, Informative

      Dear America

      We like Canada more than you

      Sincerely

      Everyone else.

    4. Re:so.... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it absolutely frightening that the citizens of the country that supposedly stands against the tyranny of organizations like the Gestapo and the Stasi not only have not overturned their government over this huge scandal, but in fact mostly agree with the surveillance program.

      Americans deserve what's coming to them.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re: so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    6. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Dear America

      We like Canada more than you

      Sincerely

      Everyone else.

      Dear Everyone Else:
      We find it rather disturbing that you're completely ok with mass spy programs until it's the US doing it. We find it upsetting that you only seem to care about WHO is fucking you up the ass, but not the fact that you're getting your anus violated in the first place.

    7. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dear Everyone Else

      We like Canada more than America too

      Sincerely

      Americans

    8. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is no haven, megavideo had some servers there, and they got busted by the US Feds all the same.

    9. Re:so.... by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      Hey hey DONT put the Canada word out there. We only have 4 years or so to get out dictator out and hopefully revese some of the "The next state" steps that have been taken by the "Harper Government" Just look at this shit http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6929/125/

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    10. Re:so.... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      I assume this message is coming to Slashdot via time-travel, from before Canada was ruled by Stephen Harper.

      P.S. Their environmental record is even worse than the U.S.'s, too, as sad as that is to contemplate.

    11. Re:so.... by icebike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Americans deserve what's coming to them.

      Actually we don't.

      It matters not a wit who we elect, because the NSA/CIA are somehow above the law, and quickly co-opt every elected official.
      We can do about as much about this as your lowly jewish shop keeper could do in 1938. We are totally screwed here, and its small comfort that you are in the same boat with your own government's spying programs.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:so.... by stenvar · · Score: 1

      I find it absolutely frightening that the citizens of the country that supposedly stands against the tyranny of organizations like the Gestapo and the Stasi not only have not overturned their government over this huge scandal, but in fact mostly agree with the surveillance program.

      I'm sorry, are you talking about modern Germany here? Because this shit has been going on in Germany for decades, and there seems to be no serious effort to stop it.

      In the US, on the other hand, this sort of spying on citizens is a relatively new phenomenon, and people are fighting it. Usually, it takes a couple of decades to shoot something like this down, but it will get shot down in the US.

    13. Re:so.... by couchslug · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Everyone Else

      We are delighted you like our norther corporate appendage more than us

      That will increase its value after assimilation is complete

      Sincerely

      America

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    14. Re:so.... by artor3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's because we're more concerned over people like you, who are so quick to talk of "overturning" the government. Bloody, violent rebellion that would leave the country in tatters, as a response to a program that's absolutely angelic compared to the shit done throughout most of the 20th century? You're nuts. We can push on our representatives to reel in the NSA, but abolishing the NSA (or worse, abolishing the government) would be disastrous. The militant anarchists are a far greater threat to our way of life.

      We've come a long way since the age of Nixon. We have an even longer way to go, but burning it all down in frustration would be moronic.

    15. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I find it a beautiful irony that the country that invented the gestapo and the stasi finds the nsa a little bit too much :)

      Perhaps they learned from it?

    16. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a reactionary idiot. "Overturning the government" can be done purely through the legal means given to us, and has absolutely nothing to do with requiring violent revolution.

      Stop painting everybody who wants to get anything done as an anarchist, as you sit around twaddling about with your ineffective "safe" ideas.

    17. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No irony, they willfully helped the NSA out, as did every other country, again just like with Google, Apple, MS, ect, ect... They all got caught with there hand in the cookie jar, and then to save face, or for PR they denied any involvement. What a shock!! Huh?

    18. Re:so.... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      +2

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    19. Re:so.... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear Anonymous Mk II,

      "Who is dicking whom."

      Sincerely,
      Ms. Bluebell, your sixth grade English Teacher

    20. Re:so.... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      have you ever looked at a pile of code and decided its better to re-write than to fix?

      see my point?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    21. Re:so.... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Freeze if you want to, you misguided martyr...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    22. Re:so.... by Maow · · Score: 1

      Dear America

      We like Canada more than you

      Sincerely

      Everyone else.

      Dear Everyone,

      We're working hard to fix that.

      Love,

      Stephan Harper

    23. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    24. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You fucking hypocrite. Why don't you read about how the Nazis came to power. As I am not German, I can only assume it's dumb-assed people like you that don't read the history books.

      Start with this link,
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler's_rise_to_power

      In case you are a "TL;DR", just look at the section "Seizure of control"
      In case you are still too fucking lazy, my response to your comment is "ditto".

      Remember, I'm not German - I've just studied history ... and that makes one of us.

      Now go fuck yourself.

    25. Re:so.... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Those decisions are usually wrong, since they invariably drop necessary elements added in over time (I'm thinking "business programming" here, not consumer apps), and all sorts of new bugs get added.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    26. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, you called him a hypocrite. You should read, understand his point, stop and think for a moment (I'll allow it may take you a while), then try and post something that actually refutes what he said? Then you should go fuck yourself with one of your history books, because clearly the last thing you've been doing with them is reading them.

    27. Re:so.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      electoral process is not the only one that can be used. I dislike violence because even if started with good intentions (of overthrowing oppressive regime) it tend to affect the wrong people. Still the stuff that matters (sic) can lead to escalation - first the polls show that people are bit uneasy about the shit, then if nothing changes small minority starts actions like calling their senators etc, then it goes to court against the government and the if that does not help there are street protests and then guerrilla war. The problem with that is you need to convince your fellow citizens that your issue is big enough to move their asses from fronts of their massive tvs and do something. To do that you need to use communications that your opponent controls and fight disinformation that your opponent is very well able to spread. The point here is: trouble makers like you (and possibly me) are easily identifiable and the actions on the other side are usually easier to be organized. We see what happened when a guy that tells us things go wrong says so openly. Even the French go with the fllow and deny entry of some presidential airplanes - this one single act scared me more than anything else. Not that I had any illusions about my fellow-humans but I see there is a coordinated actions of agencies that are not known for their respect to human rights - if even an airplane of a president of an independent country is not safe from them (Bolivian Airplane denied entry due to 'technical' problems) then what can a simple citizen do? I agree with you that it is not easy to fight this sort of policy - a single citizen has hardly a chance and to protest can easily destroy your livelihood - after all you are then enemy of the state and the people, traitor etc. Still this all can be done and it looks to me that something must happen as the level of government arrogance threatens the base of our society. It is also not US only that went OTT there as we have seen French like to work with US too so they most likely have similar program and would prefer to show possible whistleblower that there is no mercy. I would believe Germany had some checks in place but the strange way the government acted on the issue makes me think they have something to hide too. It would not be the first time.

    28. Re:so.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Actually it is good that you mentioned AH (the meme fits here actually). The little Austrian did raise to power using mostly legal methods and a bit of violence. This has changed when he got all the powers he needed as then the previously illegal things became law. I am not saying this is going to happen in US or any other western country now but times are difficult and such powers if they got in hands of some ruthless surrounded by opportunists can quickly make life of a normal person quite unpleasant especially if such person is perceived as opponent of current status quo. This can happen in any western country and I think we are at crossroads now. Yes the state agencies need modern technology and authority but that should have limits and be under public control at least there must be a chance to know what they are doing. IN certain sense US citizenry is indeed guilty here as they left the door open with their attitude to privacy in commercial context. Still all western countries do the same things - I just do not believe that all these 3 letter agencies left such opportunity and a set brilliant tools go unused.

    29. Re:so.... by umghhh · · Score: 1

      Has Snowden leaked any plans of Anschluss? I must have missed that but I cannot say I am surprised.....

    30. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One day, if all goes well, the NSA will be a thing of the past. When that day comes, and America is a free country again, Americans might find that it takes considerable more time to regain their reputation as a free country than being one in practice. Ironically, you will then be indeed free, because the terrible lessons from the recent past will be fresh in everyone's mind. People then will make comments about the USA similar to yours today.

    31. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's irrelevant. The point is that many of you actually fucking support those institutions. Nevermind whether you actually have a say in it or not.

    32. Re:so.... by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      it comes to no surprise that the country that invented concentration camps (your children may be starving here but outside we shoot on sight) drowns in nsa safety schemes

    33. Re:so.... by Raziel-chan · · Score: 1

      I find it absolutely frightening that the citizens of the country that supposedly stands against the tyranny of organizations like the Gestapo and the Stasi not only have not overturned their government over this huge scandal, but in fact mostly agree with the surveillance program.

      Americans deserve what's coming to them.

      When did it stand against nazi tyrrany or tyranny in general? They were perfectly happy watching the nazis swallow up Europe until Japan came in and broke some of their toys.
      All the US stands against is anyone else having any power.

      cya
      Raziel-chan

    34. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -10

    35. Re:so.... by sithlord2 · · Score: 1


      That's because some countries DO learn from their mistakes in the past?

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
    36. Re:so.... by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      ...What point are you trying to make, exactly? I seriously don't know.

      If you're interpreting GP to mean "we don't deserve this but the Jews did", I'm sure that's not what he was going for. In both cases we're talking about a (more or less) democratically-elected government that went off the rails.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    37. Re:so.... by RepliCounts · · Score: 1

      What would Hitler have done with PRISM?

    38. Re:so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we don't.

      Of course you do.

      It matters not a wit who we elect

      And therein lies the problem as well as the first step to a solution.

      That first step is: Don't elect anyone in the next elections. Simply do not vote, at all, and make it public what you're doing and why you're doing it. On as broad a scale as humanly possible.

      Of course, you're currently unable to do that, on a nation-wide scale, which is also a part of the problem, but it is a part that you could work towards. Begin a grass-roots campaign to get people to stop voting, until things begin to change in a real way. As long as you keep voting in the candidates put forth (and thus vetted) by those already in power you'll not accomplish anything. You need to break the pattern. And it's only you, the people of the US that can do so. But it is something that you can do if you put your mind to it.

      Get on with it. Please. I'm doing what I can in my country.

    39. Re:so.... by icebike · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that will work.
      Its worked so well in other places it has been tried.

      Oh, wait, it hasn't worked anywhere, ever, at anytime, in any country, even once, period.

      Idiot.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  3. Gee, ya' think... by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ...those officials might know more than they let on? After all, this could be a simple contingency plan they've had ready.

  4. What mass encryption? by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Insightful

    SSL is a transport crypto, if they "break in" the data is still stored in clear text on the servers. This was a crypto professor?? Wow...

    --
    Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    1. Re:What mass encryption? by crutchy · · Score: 1

      erm... if anyone breaks in to anything it usually implies that they take what they're after

      if you have the infrastructure to break SSL en mass encrypting on the server probably isn't going to buy you much extra security. maybe the web page should be presented to the user in encrypted form too (even seen the movie "antitrust"... the cameras are watching).

    2. Re:What mass encryption? by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My point is that SSL encrypts in transit not at rest. While sniffing the traffic and breaking the SSL is likely hard, if done right and new breaks notwithstanding, but when the code lands on the mail server it won't be STORED encrypted. At that point one need only break into the server and dump the data unencrypted back to the mothership. SSL will have done nothing but made it harder to sniff the traffic. She seems to allow for the idea they may and could break in and seems to think the SSL provides some protection against this - I'm baffled.

      This woman said "... Of course the NSA could still break in if they wanted to, but the mass encryption of emails would make it harder and more expensive for them to do so." and she was referring to their plan to use SSL transport encryption.

      Her comment makes NO sense and this is what I was trying to point out, I didn't think I'd have to explain it to this level. She seems to think that because they've used SSL in transport that someone breaking into the server is going to be faced with a crypto problem because of it - they won't. If that's truly what she thought and she was quoted accurately then I'm shocked that she claims any sort of knowledge about cryptography. Transport crypto does nothing at all for STORAGE. If all a bank ever did was rely on SSL then someone breaking into their website would have a field day with the unencrypted access to the data!

      P.S. What web mail based email service DOESN'T use SSL transport? If they were allowing their customer's email to go over the wire unencrypted prior to this then I'm, again, in shock!

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    3. Re:What mass encryption? by khallow · · Score: 1

      What about it doesn't make sense? Breaking into a mail server is not a zero cost action and they won't be able to grab all the emails off of all the servers like they could sniffing network traffic.

    4. Re:What mass encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. What web mail based email service DOESN'T use SSL transport? If they were allowing their customer's email to go over the wire unencrypted prior to this then I'm, again, in shock!

      The real news is that Deutsche Telekom (20 million customers) and United Internet (30 million customers) announced they will use STARTTLS while relaying emails and according to forum posts on heise.de this is not restricted to servers within that group.

    5. Re:What mass encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is that in Germany there are no gag orders and the secret service cannot just tap networks at will as they do in the USA.
      While the NSA and BND can still get into your data if they really want, they have to go through a lot more steps and in a more transparent way.

    6. Re:What mass encryption? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      There is also the minor fact that the server-to-server communications behind the scenes are rarely encrypted, but usually sent plain text. Using an SSL connection to your email server may give you a warm fuzzy feeling, but it does nothing to protect your email once it leaves the server.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    7. Re:What mass encryption? by crutchy · · Score: 0

      maybe he was assuming the use of windows mail servers

      anyone who puts their faith in windows for any server deserves to be hacked

    8. Re:What mass encryption? by crutchy · · Score: 0

      seems like server-server is where the NSA taps are. apparently they use beam splicing on fibre optic lines in data centers.

      i guess though the point of all this is to increase awareness and wake the world up from their ignorant hypnosis when it comes to internet security and privacy... anything is better than nothing and encrypting some segments of the overall transfer at least reduces the size of the target.

      eventually (hopefully) internet users will think twice before spilling their life stories on facebook and using the same password for everything

  5. Thiscould be the beginning by Teun · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This could be the beginning of US companies being shunned for what their government is doing.
    Because this message will hit the front pages and prime time news.
    Although many Europeans say they've got nothing to hide they are jstill pissed off about the warrant-less spying an outside, previously considered friendly, force is doing upon them.
    I am really sad about the need for this walling off, it defeats the great idea and ideal of a world-wide network.

    But it seems to be necessary, if only as a message to the perpetrators because we know nothing is unbreakable.

    And please do remember this mail will still be accessible to German courts but now on their own conditions.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re: Thiscould be the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some 'Ost-algia':

      Why do ex-Stasi officers make great Berlin taxi drivers?

      You just tell them your name and they already know where you live...

    2. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by Spottywot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a certain amount of dick waving about this, but the more companies and countries that embarrass America and the NSA the better.

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
    3. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by stenvar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This could be the beginning of US companies being shunned for what their government is doing.

      That's not "the beginning", it's a long, drawn-out process of European politicians and European corporations throwing whatever shit they can at the US in order to try to get Europeans to use European servers and services. They want that both because it means more revenue for them, and because it's easier for European governments to spy on their own citizens if they use European servers.

      And please do remember this mail will still be accessible to German courts but now on their own conditions.

      Are you really so naive that you think "courts" are involved? German government agencies have nearly free reign in what they access within Germany and what they do with it. You're probably still better off using a US server; the NSA may be listening in to everything you say, but the German government will have a much harder time to get at that information.

    4. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be the beginning of US companies being shunned for what their government is doing.

      Because this message will hit the front pages and prime time news.

      Although many Europeans say they've got nothing to hide they are jstill pissed off about the warrant-less spying an outside, previously considered friendly, force is doing upon them.

      I am really sad about the need for this walling off, it defeats the great idea and ideal of a world-wide network.

      But it seems to be necessary, if only as a message to the perpetrators because we know nothing is unbreakable.

      And please do remember this mail will still be accessible to German courts but now on their own conditions.

      Why didn't they keep their mail in country already? What specific legal protections of privacy did they think they had in the U.S.?

    5. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by Teun · · Score: 1

      Let's hope this will make the public more aware of spying in general, German parliamentarians have already requested information about their own services.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    6. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by w1zz4 · · Score: 1

      You would be surprise to know how many pawns don't give a fuck... I got an argument lately with a friends who was seeking for a cloud provider to host his computer backup. All the company he mentionned are american. I then told him if I was him I would never deal with an american co to store my data because of PRISM. He respond to me that it was probably over hyped that PRISM stuff, and anyway he don't have any thing to hide from the NSA. USA are leaning more more toward a 1984 like society and are trying to extend it to other "friendly" country and it piss me off...

    7. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What exactly was the argument? Seems to me you voice a few concerns and your friend didn't care enough about them to bother with them. Did you argue with him that he should care or something?

    8. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by w1zz4 · · Score: 1

      In fact we argue for about ten minutes before he finally told me that he had nothing to hide from NSA. At this moment I was so mad at him that I just move on to something else... Don't ask me for the full log of this conversation, it's not all clear in my head, damn beers....

    9. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by ISoldat53 · · Score: 2

      Ironic. I wonder how much of the intel goes directly to US corporations?

    10. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next steps I would love to see are millions of people from all over the world suing NSA, USA, GCHQ, UK in their own countries for billions of dollars for possibly spying on then (three hops), arresting these employes visiting their country etc.

    11. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      This could be the beginning of US companies being shunned for what their government is doing.

      That's not "the beginning", it's a long, drawn-out process of European politicians and European corporations throwing whatever shit they can at the US in order to try to get Europeans to use European servers and services. They want that both because it means more revenue for them, and because it's easier for European governments to spy on their own citizens if they use European servers.

      e

      And it has of course nothing to do with the fact that American privacy standards and consumer protection standards are way below the European or that American companies behave as if they are only bound by American law (if at all).

      You're over simplifying things.

    12. Re:Thiscould be the beginning by stenvar · · Score: 1

      And it has of course nothing to do with the fact that American privacy standards and consumer protection standards are way below the European

      That's not "a fact". Privacy laws in Europe are only stronger with respect to private companies, they are much weaker with respect to governments.

      that American companies behave as if they are only bound by American law (if at all)

      Another "fact" you make up out of thin air.

  6. Pointless by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    All governments monitor their citizens.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Okay, but what is ratio of number of governments monitoring to the number of citizens monitored. And how much does the US government care about protecting the rights of Germans? My guess would be: not much. German law has privacy guarantees. The US law pretty much doesn't. So US surveillance of Germans could collect information that was illegal to collect about US citizens or illegal by Germany to collect about German citizens. And then the US could use this information to blackmail, embarrass, or commit fraud. Or they could make an error, and get a German citizen put on a terrorist watchlist.

      There are a lot of reasons for governments to spy on one another, but there is no valid reason for a government to spy on random citizens of another country.

    2. Re:Pointless by hydrofix · · Score: 5, Interesting

      German companies now rate U.S. as the second worst risk to industrial espionage, only second to China. Even Russia is considered a more trustworthy IT partner than the Americans. It's not only the private citizens who care for some privacy.

    3. Re:Pointless by Teun · · Score: 1

      Sure but the point is this is to hinder a foreign intervention into matters the local security forces should and can deal with but now according to the laws of the land.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    4. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US has always monitored its citizens, just not on virtually every single citizen one of her citizens unconstitutionally (illegally).

    5. Re:Pointless by stenvar · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And where is the evidence of the NSA actually engaging in industrial espionage?

    6. Re:Pointless by msobkow · · Score: 1

      The American people should be so proud. Their government has managed to surpass China's internet monitoring through automation. Next steps: Censorship and pre-crime arrests.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    7. Re:Pointless by Miletos · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, at least this way it'll only be their own government eavesdropping the private conversations of German citizens. Isn't that a big relief?

    8. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You could, for example, type "NSA engaging in industrial espionage" into Google.

    9. Re:Pointless by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This goes all the way back to the Seattle Asian Pacific Economic Forum in the 1990s, and Snowden released multiple documents relating that the NSA is using its capabilities engage in industrial espionage on behalf of some select companies.

      Last year the federal government allowed intelligence operatives to sell the services to private companies while under the employ of these services.

      Wikileaks cablegate also relates a lot of these sorts of incidents.

      So, there's reams of evidence. If you can't see it that's a personal problem.

    10. Re:Pointless by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Oops. I forgot. They already have "pre-crime" arrests: extraordinary rendition for suspected terrorists.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    11. Re:Pointless by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      All governments monitor their citizens.

      I don't think it's a matter of "whether", but a matter of "to what extent".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    12. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Echelon was abused to this end, this is well known.

    13. Re:Pointless by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Is up to the country if decide to monitor their own citizens or not. The big problem are the governments that monitor the citizens of all the other countries (besides their own ones)

    14. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations? Sources? I call bullshit!

    15. Re:Pointless by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Before 9/11 CIA admitted that the most important task for them is industrial espionage. Now it might be second most important.

    16. Re: Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suppose you could read the wikipedia article, but the EU report on ECHELON has a nice section (10.7) outlining the known history of state-involved industrial espionage: http://cryptome.org/echelon-ep-fin.htm#10

    17. Re:Pointless by jma05 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just wait 1-2 weeks. The next batch of revelations is due to start in about a week.
      Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/07/us-usa-security-snowden-brazil-idUSBRE97600L20130807

      The documents concerning this are expected to be included in them.

        “The pretext [given by Washington] for the spying is only one thing: terrorism and the need to protect the [American] people. But the reality is that there are many documents which have nothing to do with terrorism or national security, but have to do with competition with other countries, in the business, industrial and economic fields," Greenwald said on Tuesday.

      Source: http://rt.com/news/journalist-thousands-snowden-documents-143/

      So, no concrete evidence yet; but it is coming soon.

    18. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where was the evidence of wholesale NSA spying before all this broke?

      You're an ignorant fool, or an NSA fanb0i.

    19. Re:Pointless by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I think civil forfeiture is the flavor of "pre-crime" that is the bigger problem in terms of likelihood of it affecting the average person (although I don't deny that extraordinary rendition is also a problem).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abused? It was the primary purpose.

    21. Re:Pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the evidence of NSA not engaging in industrial espionage? Since all this shit is secret I'm starting to reason that the burden of proof lies on their side.

    22. Re:Pointless by stenvar · · Score: 1

      Where is the evidence?

    23. Re:Pointless by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      To which one? To the fact that it was, you'll have to search yourself. I cannot remember where I saw it, after all it happened about 15 years ago.
      For the latter I have no evidence, but I think it is pretty obvious provided the former is true.

    24. Re:Pointless by stenvar · · Score: 1

      I have never seen any evidence that the CIA engages in industrial espionage. You're fabricating your claim.

  7. NSA Announces ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And the NSA announced that it will figure out a way to get DT's data anyway because that's how they roll.

  8. T-Mobile USA? by MrEricSir · · Score: 2

    Does this affect Deutsche Telekom subsidiaries such as T-Mobile USA?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:T-Mobile USA? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Self signed National Security Letters are the law in the USA.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  9. a little? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1....
    a little?
    a little bit of crap still is crap.

  10. SSL security by ubeatha · · Score: 2

    What's stopping the NSA from man in the middling all this SSL traffic? They have the fibre providers rooted, I find it hard to believe that they don't have to print certs like the treasury prints money. I seem to recall China doing something similar with one of their root CAs a couple of years back.

    1. Re:SSL security by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Because very quickly somebody would compare SSL certs exchanged through a different path, notice the discrepancy, and the whole thing would blow wide open. Or are you assuming they have nabbed DT's private key? Or cracked their public key?

  11. Snowden Gave the Goverment and Uppercut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and good on him for that... the goverment needs a good solid reminder that they are supposed to be working for the people, and not the corporate dogs.

    This is all gearing up to be a modern form of dictatorship...

    Corporate power = hitler power... over time...

  12. No more NSA splitter? by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Informative

    "95% of intra-German Internet communications are routed via a switch in Frankfurt."
    From the EU "Temporary Committee on the ECHELON Interception System"
    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A5-2001-0264+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN
    How will SSL be "harder and more expensive" for the NSA/GCHQ if a friendly German agency just hands over the keys again?
    Seems like the West German post war telco system was designed to track Soviet/East German contacts via a few central locations.
    Why would the US need to "break in" if they where in on the design and have a great generational working relationship with German telcos and intelligence agency staff?
    i.e. "still doesn't prevent governments from getting information"

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:No more NSA splitter? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Geesh, all your rational reasoning is going to spoil the incentives to switch services and pay a lot of money to host with these companies. You are spoiling capitalism here..

  13. The scarier ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are the Google fanboys. 'I don't care about my privacy because they're providing really awesome service for me... before I even know I want it!'

    You know what the next step from that is? Providing you really awesome service from the government before you even realize you did something wrong. Y'know, assuming you DON'T fuck up, and they just need to dig up something to blackmail you with instead. Either/or.

  14. Not all governments throw people away by copponex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ATF uses fake drugs, big bucks to snare suspects

    It's the drugs â" though non-existent â" that make that possible because federal law usually imposes tougher mandatory sentences for drugs than for guns. The more drugs the agents say are likely to be in the stash house, the longer the targets' sentence is likely to be. Conspiring to distribute 5 kilograms of cocaine usually carries a mandatory 10-year sentence â" or 20 years if the target has already been convicted of a drug crime.

    That fact has not escaped judges' notice. The ATF's stings give agents "virtually unfettered ability to inflate the amount of drugs supposedly in the house and thereby obtain a greater sentence," a federal appeals court in California said in 2010. "The ease with which the government can manipulate these factors makes us wary." Still, most courts have said tough federal sentencing laws leave them powerless to grant shorter prison terms.

    To the ATF, long sentences are the point. Fifteen years "is the mark," Smith said.

    "You get the guy, you get him with a gun, and you can lock him up for 18 months for the gun. All you did was give this guy street creds," Smith said. "When you go in there and you stamp him out with a 15-to-life sentence, you make an impact in that community." ...
    [A defendant's] lawyer, Michael Falconer, said he wouldn't be opposed to the drug-house stings if he thought the ATF could make sure they were aimed only at people who were already ripping off drug dealers. "But on some level," he said, "it's Orwellian that they have to create crime to prevent crime."

    You know what the US government won't do for that same individual? Ensure they have a decent education, a basic level of care for their mental and physical health, a safe neighborhood, and a real shot at becoming a contributing member of society even though that would cost less than convicting them of thoughtcrime and throwing them in prison for fifteen years. Instead we pay for some kitted out machine gun-toting pigs to play cowboy rather than policing the streets like officers. Not incidentally, they're too chickenshit to get out of their cars in a lot of those neighborhoods. Yet they still collect their paycheck and their pension, live way out in the suburbs to avoid the desperation they help create with their cowardice, and pat themselves on the back for being heroes.

    Now imagine you're an immigrant, or an Iraqi, Yemeni, Afghani, or Syrian. You're worth even less than a citizen. You're trash. You're not even a speedbump on the way to some policy goal rooted in geopolitical theories that have been dead to the rest of the world since the 80s. The kind of policy that sends a million troops and five trillion dollars to a sanctioned, isolated nation, and ends up destabilizing the entire region, massively aiding Iran, and stoking tensions between Shia and Sunni, all while avoiding a single hint of punishment for Saudi Arabia or Pakistan where all of the funding and most of the terrorists for 9/11 came from. Oh, and as a plus: where al Qaeda was unheard of before, they now have another weak state to operate from. Brilliant.

    That's why the rest of the world despises the American government. It's not our freedom. It's our complete lack of principle, abject hypocrisy, and massive state violence that they hate. And with our apathetic political landscape, they're beginning to tire of Americans individually for being lazy, ignorant, wasteful, and greedy. We just sit here and take it; a nation of lolling toddlers waiting on the next innovation in fast food and reruns of Pawn Stars while our wealth is squandered in military adventurism that has killed millions of innocent people in only five decades.

    PRISM is just icing on the rotting carcass that once wa

    1. Re:Not all governments throw people away by Nutria · · Score: 0

      You know what the US government won't do for that same individual? Ensure they have a decent education, a basic level of care for their mental and physical health, a safe neighborhood, and a real shot at becoming a contributing member of society

      Civics class fail. With a low 5-digit id like that, I'd have expected you to know that the individual states are responsible for all the things you mentioned.

      well-earned hate for the state of democracy in America

      Good thing the US isn't a democracy, then, that the Founding Fathers distrusted it, and wrote anti-democratic philosophy into the Constitution...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:Not all governments throw people away by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      You know what the US government won't do for that same individual? Ensure they have a decent education, a basic level of care for their mental and physical health, a safe neighborhood, and a real shot at becoming a contributing member of society even though that would cost less than convicting them of thoughtcrime and throwing them in prison for fifteen years. Instead we pay for some kitted out machine gun-toting pigs to play cowboy rather than policing the streets like officers.

      Note: You're looking at costs from what the people pay in taxes. You need to realize you're looking at it the wrong way. People aren't the focus of benefit. People are farmed, the more the better according to our rulers. The privatization of prisons, the military and loads of other programs directly benefits the rulers: Corporations. The government does not work for the people anymore. It works for the corporations.

      Which is why I find this PRISM shit so silly. You think corporations don't want to do their corrupt shit in private? We the people can't do jack, but you piss off the rulers and their powerful lobbyists then changes happen at break neck speeds.

      This video explains the situation the US is in decently.

    3. Re:Not all governments throw people away by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      The Decline? are you a NOFX fan? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyH4CgHVpgA

    4. Re:Not all governments throw people away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (obscenity)

    5. Re:Not all governments throw people away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You americans sure are pretty good at getting stuck on words.

    6. Re:Not all governments throw people away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually not the hypocrisy, but the foreign policy's we dislike. As much as it pains us to see the USA slide down, we would respect it as a internal democratic choice being made by the country as a whole. Yes, many choices are silly, but the US is not alone in doing dumb and silly things (duhh). Just don't force it onto others.

      But I would never equate choices by the majority with choices by individual Americans. I know to many individuals to know that I like individuals depending on their personal beliefs and convictions no matter what their background or nationality is.

  15. Won't matter by s2r · · Score: 0

    The metadata will still be collected as soon as the email leaves the smtp server unencrypted.

  16. Perhaps it's time for mail clients to return? by laird · · Score: 2

    Perhaps it's time for mail clients to make a comeback.

    With end-to-end encryption, such as PGP, GPG or S/MIME, users control their own security and don't have to trust anyone in between, so all the ISPs could know (and leak to whoever wants to spy on their users) is the email addresses in the routing, not the email contents. These problems were all solved many years ago. Sure, mail clients aren't as convenient as webmail, but if there's a concerted attack by our ISPs on our private communications, the least we can do is fight back.

    There are secure mail clients for pretty much every OS. So no easy browser access, but that's the cost of controlling your own communications.

    1. Re:Perhaps it's time for mail clients to return? by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      Good luck with that.

      Even back before local mail clients started to fall by the wayside, setting up [P]GP[G] generally involved a lot of not very user-friendly hoop-jumping. Then, after you finally got it to work (or you went with one of the niche mail clients whose only real functionality was the encryption), you had to deal with keys.

      By the time you got your keys ready to go, and assuming you could find someone who could/would sign it, etc... you most likely realized that 100% of the people you were likely to email in the next 24 months would not be jumping through the same hoops, so you were good to go, but it was still ultimately useless to you.

      If, by some miracle of statistical noise, you did end up in email communication with someone who had both the patience and inclination to go through the same setup, and that setup was compatible with yours, he/she was probably on the other end of the continent, if not on a different one, which made the traditional model of face-to-facing for key exchange impractical, at best. Of course, various middle-men services sprang up for a while to facilitate that process, which pretty much defeated the purpose of that process.

      I'm not saying that end-to-end encryption isn't useful. Not even close to saying that. But if we're being honest, it's not something that's feasible to work for the mundanes any time soon.

    2. Re:Perhaps it's time for mail clients to return? by Max_W · · Score: 1

      I think it is a very good idea. I would add that an e-mail client, say, "Thunderbird", allows to use several e-mail accounts.

      This way not all e-mail messages are readily available for an snooping on one server.

    3. Re:Perhaps it's time for mail clients to return? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the solution is to make I2P and PGP accessible to the majority then.

  17. Good start by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Next make sure that all citizens have a public IP, can put a server there, and even provide an SSL certificate and generic dns name so they can put their own secure servers if they want. Teach to trust noone, and they will be free.

  18. why bother when you already have the keys? by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The NSA will probably next be cornering the market on high GPU count graphics cards.

    What makes you think they don't have the private keys already, or can't get them?

    At this point it's probably not unreasonable at all to assume that the NSA either has their foot in the door somehow, or simply National Security Letter's the CA into giving them any keys they want. Technically, all they'd need is the CA's keys, as that's all that protects *your* private key when it's in transit to you, since they're already snooping for everything else.

    Really, the current CA system is a dream for the NSA - encryption that is controlled completely by a small group. It's now making a lot of sense why they went after Zimmerman for PGP. The peer-to-peer trust network and person-to-person encryption must've scared the shit out of them.

    While we're on the subject of reasonable assumptions - it seems reasonable to assume that the NSA has worked to insert weaknesses and vulnerabilities in most open-source encryption software. Whether they've been successful or not is what we need to know. Remember the fuss a few years ago with IPSEC, OpenBSD, and the FBI?

    1. Re:why bother when you already have the keys? by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      Remember the fuss a few years ago with IPSEC, OpenBSD, and the FBI?

      And it was much ado about nothing. The good thing about OpenBSD is that they are anal about reviewing their code, and nothing was found.

    2. Re:why bother when you already have the keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the CAs never see your private key.

    3. Re:why bother when you already have the keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Technically, all they'd need is the CA's keys, as that's all that protects *your* private key when it's in transit to you

      No it's not!

      You have your private key, and public key, which is signed by a CA. The private key never leaves the server. Thats why it's called "PUBLIC key cryptography"

    4. Re:why bother when you already have the keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, all they'd need is the CA's keys, as that's all that protects *your* private key when it's in transit to you

      No it's not!

      You have your private key, and public key, which is signed by a CA. The private key never leaves the server. Thats why it's called "PUBLIC key cryptography"

      This is correct, if you have the CA keys you still need to do a man in the middle attack to get any data . If you have a quantum computer on the other hand...

    5. Re:why bother when you already have the keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sent you a "copy" of your private key for your server. They generated the key. It was not generated locally by you. I would bet the CA kept a copy for backup (cough cough).

      If the private key was not generated locally by you, you have no way to be sure.

  19. The US spies on everybody by symbolset · · Score: 0

    Spooks spy. That's what they do. It's their job and they're good at it.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:The US spies on everybody by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Assassins kill. That's what they do. It's their job and they're good at it.

    2. Re:The US spies on everybody by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Not to put too fine a point on it, some folks need a swift guide into the pages of history.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  20. Hey America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your jobs are belong to us.

  21. I had the same thought by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It is a crazy statement, the only thing I can think is that the journalist messed up what is actually being done... perhaps there is also encryption happening on the server in addition to SSL, though if you break into the server decrypting the messages on the fly it seems a short skip to get the content anyway... but at least they can't just copy a database file. They have to copy the database file AND a private key that was stored on the same server. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  22. learn to ECHELON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear World,

    America's Special Friends in the Commonwealth of Nations have been spying with us since day 0.

    Sincerely,

    The American militia

  23. What could the NSA possibly do? by vvpt · · Score: 1

    Spend lots of resources on breaking the SSL encryption? No, just sent a National Security letter to Verisign because Deutsche Telekom’s webmail uses a Verisign certificate: http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/3742/y87k.jpg

  24. WTFing F by fa2k · · Score: 1

    They hadn't already enabled SSL? This is a travesty. SSL should be enabled to protect against opportunistic hackers at public wi-fi networks etc. It will also protect against more advanced enemies like the mafia (the mafia would probably use trojans or hardware wiretaps, if they actually do tech stuff).

    SSL isn't that great vs. big governments anyway: anyone with any valid CA cert can spoof a valid cert for any site. It does, however, mean that they can't passively tap the stream, they have to use a man in the middle attack (or possibly immense computing resources or unknown weaknesses in the algorithm).

  25. Jawohl! by stevez67 · · Score: 0

    As if the German gov't isn't snooping just like the USA? Anyone who believes they aren't should lighten up on how much of the Kool-Aid they sip.

  26. NSA cracking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will. They have a unlimited budget to to so.

    ()-()

  27. Germany includes the former East Germany... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    The present Germany includes the former Deutsche Democratic Republic (aka 'East Germany) which was one of the more totalitarian states ever devised by man. The DDR took surveillance of its citizens to extreme levels including listening to and recording all phone calls and other communications but also including the development of a nationwide network of citizens who spied on their neighbors (and each other) and reported to the East German police on every activity. The point here is that many/most German citizens are far more aware of the human cost of government surveillance than Americans and the Germans want no part of it. On the plus side, though, there was not a single instance of an attack by Islamic terrorists in the former East Germany during its painful existence.

  28. The NSA Didn't "Steal" Anything from Germany by Tempest451 · · Score: 1

    All information gathered by the NSA in regards to German emails was given to the NSA in a mutual exchange of intelligence information. What the Germans are doing now is trying to wash their hands of any complicity in the matter, even when that very information helped capture two Russian spies. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/trial-of-russian-spies-in-germany-strains-diplomatic-relations-a-908975.html

  29. And my predictions are coming true already by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I honestly didn't expect things to change as quickly as all that. And in actuality, I rather expected (though didn't express) the US government backpedal and cease most of the offending activity. In fact, I rather hoped the defunding of the NSA went through. It did not and I am sure that had a lot to do with the accelleration of efforts to "route around the damage."

    I think it's time we either change our national anthem or change our nation. "Land of the free and home of the brave" we are neither.

    And while I feel that the global financial crises are engineered and intentional, I think one thing the engineers are failing to appreciate is that when people have nothing to lose, that is when they are the biggest threat to those in power and/or in control. (French revolution anyone?) And while it seems apparent they have been planning for that eventuality by militarizing police and working to register and eventually take all the guns, things may be failing faster than they can roll these changes out.

    The more people begin to mistrust US technologies, US companies and anything connected or influenced by US government, the more the rest of the world will begin to heal. Meanwhile, the US will become an extremely challenged nation... sad, but it needs to happen.

  30. Just a piece of marketing BS by garry_g · · Score: 1

    While the original article doesn't clearly point to a German article on this, I assume this is about the while DE-Mail/e-Post crap that Telekom/United Internet and German Post has set up ... the problem here is, that neither of their services provide a clean end-to-end encryption. While the communication between the providers (like German Telekom) and the end user at both ends of the email communication may be encrypted, mails are decrypted at the provider in order to "scan for viruses and malware", of course only to protect the user ... yeah, right. So, the whole system is broken by design ... Law enforcement, BND (German NSA), or whoever have nice central points where they can access information unencrypted. The only improvement over using US or other international servers is that access supposedly is under German control and therefore German laws.
    How much that is worth has been seen (and most likely will become more clear over the next few months) in the wake of the NSA affair ... too bad that too few people are willing and able to use things like PGP/GPG to encrypt their mails ...

  31. Yes, it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the NSA has hardware set up that can likely intercept any communication, yes the CA key is all that protects it because the NSA can simply generate their own key, sign it with their CA and and MITM you. They have probably been doing this for some time. That is what GP meant.