Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Military Developing Stealth Snowmobile

innocent_white_lamb writes "The Canadian military is currently testing a $620,000 hybrid-electric stealth snowmobile. Testing includes speed, towing capacity, endurance, mobility, usability, and of course, noise emissions. The testing and most other information about the stealth snowmobile is secret and very little information has been released other than the fact that it does exist. One document reads 'The noise level of an internal combustion engine cannot be reduced to an acceptable level for missions where covertness may be required, especially given the increased propagation of sound in cold, dry, Arctic air.' Therefore, National Defence's research agency is 'pursuing the development of a "silent" snowmobile for winter operations in Canada, specifically in the Arctic.' Michael Byers, an Arctic policy expert, questions the need for a stealth snowmobile. 'I don't see a whole lot of evidence that criminals and terrorists are scooting around Canada's North on snowmobiles and that we have to sneak up on them,' he said."

40 of 187 comments (clear)

  1. They did the impossible! by Dj+Stingray · · Score: 5, Funny

    Step 1.

    Paint it white.

    Step 2.

    Have a beer eh!

  2. Three Canadians are in a boat fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of them falls in and sinks. Another one goes in and pulls him back into the boat and starts giving him mouth-to-mouth. He stops and says "Phew! I don't remember Stosh smelling this bad!". And the other one says, "Yeah, and I don't remember him wearing a snowmobile suit, either."

    1. Re:Three Canadians are in a boat fishing by AJWM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not entirely unbelievable. A dive buddy of mine was doing some part time commercial dive work. One spring he was helping inspect the cooling water intakes for a steam plant in downtown Ottawa, near the river. Guess what he found up against one of the gratings. Yeah, a guy who'd gone through the ice on a snowmobile that winter.

      Put him right off diving for a while, it did.

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Three Canadians are in a boat fishing by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

      He found it grating, eh?

  3. Tonight on Top Gear by Velex · · Score: 3, Funny

    I attempt to cross Nunavut in a Range Rover. Captain Slow takes a rather novel approach. And Hammond uses a state of the art stealth /snow mobile/. Tonight on Top Gear. *cue theme*

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    1. Re:Tonight on Top Gear by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 3, Funny

      And then halfway through they completely fake the snowmobile failing and spend the rest of the episode poo pooing it over something that never actually happened.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Tonight on Top Gear by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      wipe your chin, saying, "Mmmm.... best South African I ever tasted."?

      I find your implication that connoisseur status be awarded those fond of fellatio to be enlightening. Perhaps making possible reality TV mashups where sex acts are constructed and sampled a-la Iron Chef. Oh sure, like any porn, it's all staged... That's the point though isn't it? Illuminating that vehicle porn is just as hokey as slice-of-life porn (reality TV), or any other such media with the label of porn.

      See also: Geek Porn, like Myth Busters... Who's faux science is more fun to watch than anything. There's nothing wrong with that, but let's not kid ourselves here.

      Or, perhaps you mean to liken a blow job to a form of praise... Ah yes, that does explains a few priestly pedophiles, though the victims never quite share the same vantage point of worship as the deranged who cause such acts. Now, that's not to say you've the mentality of a pedophile, but since we're making the analogies so fast and loose I'd say it's hard not to make the shoe fit.

  4. Has Sarah Palin been alerted? by Snufu · · Score: 2

    Commies to her right, stealth snowmobiles to her left. Does DEFCON go to 11?

    1. Re:Has Sarah Palin been alerted? by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, but her IQ does.

    2. Re:Has Sarah Palin been alerted? by Y-Crate · · Score: 3, Informative

      Commies to her right, stealth snowmobiles to her left. Does DEFCON go to 11?

      DEFCON 11 would be a state of peaceful tranquility unlike anything the world has seen since the dawn of humanity.

      You're looking for DEFCON 1.

  5. "Expert" ? by arisvega · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Michael Byers, an Arctic policy expert, questions the need for a stealth snowmobile. 'I don't see a whole lot of evidence that criminals and terrorists are scooting around Canada's North on snowmobiles and that we have to sneak up on them,'

    Then Michael Byers is not quite the expert: when the ice cap in the North Pole shrinks or disappears completely, a whole new theater will come into play. Claims have already been filed for integration of the North Arctic Ocean into their exclusive economic zones from several countries, including Canada.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    1. Re:"Expert" ? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      That might be why he said 'criminals and terrorists'.

      If the various other disputed aquatic zones are anything to go by, it's a lot of dick waving and diplomatic grandstanding, the occasional shootout between somebody's probably-illegal fishing boat and somebody else's quite-possibly-trigger-happy coast guard, and not too much else.

      There's a first time for everything, of course, but it'd have to be a pretty juicy territorial claim to be worth getting into an actual war over.

    2. Re:"Expert" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your reading comprehension needs work. People are well aware of that motivation, especially in Canada.

      It still doesn't mean it's an issue usefully addressed by a stealth snowmobile, which was Byers' point. It would make a lot more sense to deploy, say, ice-capable military ships (Canada doesn't really have any, yet), subs that can actually work under ice (the very modest Canadian sub fleet is diesel, and ill-suited for polar work), or long-endurance manned planes and/or aerial drones. The biggest problem in the Canadian Arctic is the sheer distance and the endurance required to cross it in harsh conditions. Snowmobiles are useful, but over short distances. They are still logistically challenging because you have to get them there, get fuel in place, they have to work in tough conditions, be maintainable, etc. The technology is pretty well developed for internal combustion engined ones. Will a stealth snowmobile help with any of these practical issues? I doubt it. Maybe if it's a whole lot more fuel efficient, reliable, or something like that. But if it isn't *way* beyond the normal specs somehow and still as reliable or better than a normal one (especially for $600k!!!!), then I can't see the point either. Who cares about "stealth" capability if it has half the range or is more tempermental (for example). To me this thing doens't make any more sense than a military-grade stealth Zamboni.

    3. Re:"Expert" ? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      How many of those disputed aquatic zones contain some of the richest untapped oil deposits on the planet? Not to mention extremely lucrative new trade routes.

      Make no mistake, there's going to be some serious guns brought to play in the fight to claim this newly accessible territory, both metaphorical and quite possibly literal.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    4. Re:"Expert" ? by quantaman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not about a war. It's about establishing sovereignty, and to maintain control over a territory you need to be police it.

      The northwest passage is a big issue over whether it's international waters or Canadian waters. Not just because of potential oil drilling or fishing, but shipping is a big issue. It's a lot easier to ensure the shipping is done safely so a ton of oil isn't dumped on our coastline if we can police the waters. Security is also a concern as there's a lot of unpopulated places for smugglers to drop cargo or illegal immigrants.

      A military grade stealth snowmobile is part of the bigger picture, it makes it easier to patrol the territory and search for smugglers or other criminals as well as shows we're taking that part of our territory seriously.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:"Expert" ? by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

      It seems likely that the stealth snowmobile would only be used for the last leg of any journey, or at least you wouldn't need the stealth mode until you got rather close. I can easily see a mission plan that has the team fly in from wherever's appropriate, land outside of any possible observation and use the snowmobile with stealth off (for greater speed) until they're almost close enough to be heard, then turn on the stealth for the final approach. In fact, it might be a case of several regular snowmobiles carrying supplies, personnel and one stealthed snowmobile being towed to a fairly close location where they set up a forward base so that the strike team doesn't have to carry enough supplies to make it back on their own. It may sound more cumbersome, but it gives the team a much better chance of escape if they only have to have enough fuel to get back to their base.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:"Expert" ? by gagol · · Score: 2

      Dude, the Far Canadian North is NOT used for smuggling anything in the country, it is just not economical. You also have to move the stuff to consumer centers. As we speak, you need to transit via Greenland by plane to reach the far north, and you cen expect delays if there is a storm on the way.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    7. Re:"Expert" ? by mirix · · Score: 2

      This is the same army that isn't equipped with enough parkas and the like to monitor the north.

      Besides that, it's just too bloody big and cold to effectively monitor. Canada and the US can't even secure the southern border well, it's much shorter, has civilization, better weather.

      The biggest island up there is 3/4 the size of texas, with 10k population total (with over two thirds of that in one town). That works out to one person per every 20 square miles, if they were distributed evenly. In the middle of november, the sun goes down and doesn't come up for TWO MONTHS! How do you defend something like that, without a ton of cash and manpower... and fuel!

      If it was just the couple big islands, it might not be as daunting either. There is a ton of them!

      The archipelago consists of 36,563 islands, of which 94 are classified as major islands, being larger than 130 km2 (50 sq mi), and cover a total area of 1,400,000 km2 (540,000 sq mi).

      So almost as much area as alaska, spread over 36000 islands. And you'd still have to defend the mainland shoreline, in addition to that, which is also gigantic, but at least contiguous.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    8. Re:"Expert" ? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 2

      I think that's why he failed. He's just an Arctic policy expert. Snowmobiles are excellent vehicles in any place where snow falls... and in Canadian winters, that's just about freakin' everywhere. It's not about the Arctic, this is about being able to fight a war in the wintertime better than anyone else can. Afghanistan gets snow in the winter, and snowmobiles get to drive just about anywhere, so avoid roadside bombs. They could have been very useful in Afghan winters for swift strike teams. If it snows, and it's wartime, this is a good idea. Everyone always complains how our soldiers don't get the gear they need, and when the government tries to change that, people whine and complain again. I'm Canadian, and I think this is a great idea.

    9. Re:"Expert" ? by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Dude, the Far Canadian North is NOT used for smuggling anything in the country, it is just not economical.

      Load a pallet of drugs onto a ship. Coast guard can't do anything because it's international waters.

      When the coast is clear send in a smaller boat (or rendezvous with one) and dump it on the shore. Then hire a bunch of guys to ride in on snowmobiles and take it down south.

      If you're shipping enough drugs or other contraband the low risk could make it economical.

      --
      I stole this Sig
  6. Re:Stealth schmealth by Dahamma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Stealth moose already exist. And they can be more effective at taking out an unsuspecting vehicle than a Predator drone...

  7. Canadian soverignty by cold+fjord · · Score: 2

    Canada has concerns about protecting the sovereignty of its arctic territories. Snowmobiles could prove useful in that.

    Battle for the Arctic heats up
    Defending our sovereignty in the Arctic
    Why everyone wants a piece of the Arctic

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  8. Re:I'm all for it by WoodenTable · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope they do decide against the F-35 contract. It's ridiculously overpriced for our military, especially given that the F-35s aren't even all that well designed for frozen-weather operations.

    Personally, I think Boeing's Super Hornets are a much better offer. Half the projected price, bigger control surfaces for easier landings on ice and better agility in the air, and two engines so that if one stalls in the cold the other can keep the plane going.

  9. Re: Greetings from the Frozen North. by AJWM · · Score: 5, Informative

    By the way thank you for purchasing our exported talent.

    Just repayment for all those ex-Avro aerospace engineers that helped put Apollo on the moon.

    --
    -- Alastair
  10. Re:Really? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    Probably end up with a small internal combustion engine generator of some sort feeding and electric motor. Shouldn't be too hard to muffle the noise if you can keep the RPMs down to a reasonable range. I'm not sure how you block the IR signature. Any combustion based motor is going to bright lite a FLIR system. Maybe the Canadians will get clever - use it to heat beer* (or is that just the English?).

    *Beer is consumed, IR blocked by body and whatever insulation the human is wearing. Added bonus is that course becomes more random over time, confusing targeting systems.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  11. Re:Cross Country Skiing by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I dunno if you have any experience pulling an ahkio sled for several miles with a squad in rucks and overwhites, but it freaking SUCKS. Tennis rackets or white rockets, it doesn't matter, it is an awful experience. There has been no experience in my life (which has experienced some exhausting things) that made me more exhausted.

    When some Canadian "Arctic policy expert" opines that no one needs a small, quiet, efficient prime mover because of a lack of "terrorists", I am reminded why no one asks "Arctic policy experts" about military matters. Same reason I don't ask soldiers about environmental policy.

  12. Re:Cross Country Skiing by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Plus, you can tow 10 skiers behind a snowmobile. And a dog team seems to meet most of your requirements. Depending on the size of missile you can strap to a dog.

    In Soviet Russia, if you have the dog and the warhead you can skip the missile...

  13. Re:Canada soon invades the US by Khashishi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't worry, we are already working on a defense, called global warming.

  14. Take into account... by XB-70 · · Score: 2

    April Fool's is actually celebrated August 18th in Canada.

    --
    *** Don't be dull.***
  15. Re:Canada soon invades the US by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

    i know more than a few hundreds fellow canadians that would love the opportunity to burn your white house down again

    Don't flatter yourself. That was the British, who were your masters.

  16. Re:Cross Country Skiing by techno-vampire · · Score: 2

    Cross-country skiing also takes a fair amount of training and practice, and there are going to be times when somebody you need on your team doesn't have either the skill or the time to learn it. Having some quiet way to get them where they need to be sounds like a good idea.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  17. Stealth Snowmobile by OVDoobie · · Score: 2
  18. Re: Greetings from the Frozen North. by dbIII · · Score: 2

    $250 million modifying an ice breaker design that they bought the plans for $20 million for a boat most shipyards spend $100 million building.

    There's one government near me that's spent more than all that put together try to fix an IBM provided payroll system.

  19. Re:Snow Mobile by Hamsterdan · · Score: 2

    Easier than breeding stealth horses...

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  20. Re:Cross Country Skiing by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes. I was a hired mercenary for the dark ubergovernment of illuminati jews involved in countless illegal wars to advance the agenda of... i forget who. they gave us this big briefing and explained it all but they lost me when they started talking about how the CIA / Kennedys was trying to kill all the Christians AND topple the Godless regimes too. The intro video was good though.

    Anywho... on the topic of military equipment and its use in advancing my jew banker / ubergovernment christian / corpotocracy / and communist new world order (which is tricky, as you can imagine) I would think my opinion SHOULD carry a little bit of weight. More so than say... yet another batshit insane conspiracy theorist or arctic policy expert. At least as it pertains to the ground soldier.

  21. Re:Cross Country Skiing by grcumb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    has been used for arctic warfare for hundreds of years as a cheap, effective way of stealthily moving a snowy environment. Hopefully the stealth sled won't ruin those capabilities.

    Not always useful in the Canadian Arctic. Pack ice sometimes extends for miles out to sea. It's a maze of 3-10 metre ridges that are an absolute bitch to navigate. Trying to pull ammo and supplies through on skis would be absolute torture. Hell, just crossing on a snowmobile through the pack ice on each side of the bay in Cape Dorset (maybe a kilometre and a half) left me sweating like a horse in -25 degree weather.

    There's not a lot of pack ice on the old Finnish/Soviet border....

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  22. The strategic maple syrup reserve... by vjoel · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    What part of `yes no` don't you understand?
  23. Re:Canada soon invades the US by TapeCutter · · Score: 2

    The Queen [has] a delegate who [has] no power what-so-ever...

    So how does the Canadian system handle a double dissolution? - Not saying you're wrong, I'm genuinely interested because here in Oz it's the job of the Queen (as represented by the GG) to force a new general election should one be required to break a budgetary deadlock. Surely you don't use the idiotic government IOU's the US uses to work around the occasional budgetary deadlocks brought on by zealous ideologues staring each other down in the house and senate?

    Note that the Aussie GG is appointed by the Aussie parliament and rubber-stamped by the Queen. The prime-minister has the (on paper) power to sack him/her without notice or reason, so the power is not solely invested in either the GG or the PM. However it is virtually a political impossibility for a PM to sack the GG in a double dissolution situation and then fail to immediately call a general election. The accepted protocol for a double dissolution is to give the PM ample opportunity to call an election before contemplating sacking him and installing a caretaker government. Any PM willing to go as far as sacking the GG to hold onto power would almost certainly lose their job in a no-confidence vote, either in their own caucus, in the house of reps, or in the next election.

    At the end of the day the Queen is a ceremonial head of state in Australia, she has one very specific political duty of any consequence, the role of a non-partisan "umpire" in the rare cases where the senate has rejected the government's budget at least twice in a row (aka: "blocked supply").

    More than a few of our mates in the US cannot wrap their head around the 'ceremonial' qualifier but most of the commonwealth can see the difference and actually strongly prefer it to a US style republic. Thing is, US politics is so ubiquitous in the mass media that until the recent round of revolving PM's in Australia, many Aussies firmly believed they voted for a PM in the same way that the US votes for a president, in fact I'm sure there's more than a handful of Aussies that still hold that misconception.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  24. Re:Stealth schmealth by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 2

    Stealth moose already exist. And they can be more effective at taking out an unsuspecting vehicle than a Predator drone...

    My money's on the stealth polar bears.

  25. Protect the syrup by T.E.D. · · Score: 2

    After Spectre or whoever heisted their Strategic Maple Syrup Reserve last year, it only makes sense to beef up their military. To do any less would be irresponsible.

    After all, next time it might be C.O.B.R.A. Make sure to load those snowmobiles with parachutes.