Slashdot Mirror


New Zealand Parliament Votes To Extend Spying Powers

pinkstuff writes "Amid protests and much opposition New Zealand parliament has just passed a bill which allows the The Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) greater spying powers."

148 comments

  1. A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear Zealanders

    Perhaps it would be wise to suggest to rename your country to Nanny Zealand or New Nannyland.

    Your fellow European

    1. Re:A proposition... by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Do you think you are not being monitored here in the Old Continent ?

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
    2. Re:A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      First they came for Bradley Manning, and I said nothing because I am not in the army.
      Then they came for Julian Assange, and I said nothing because I am not a hacker.
      Then they came for Edward Snowden, and I said nothing because I am not a defence contractor.
      Then they came for the Guardian, and I said nothing because I am not in the media.

      Then they came for me. And there were no whistle blowers left to say anything.

    3. Re:A proposition... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      That's a bit of a strawman argument. AC didn't say his country, whatever it is, is any better.

      If I am on fire, I still may be able to accurately identify whether or not YOU are on fire as well.

    4. Re:A proposition... by Safety+Cap · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So why were you endangering national security?

      Every time you use teh interwebs, you are endangering national security.

      Every time you leave the house, you are endangering national security.

      Every time you stay at home, you are endangering national security.

      ---

      Consider that they are tracking everyone.

      Which means everyone is a suspect.

      And they wouldn't be suspects if they weren't guilty.

      ---

      Q. What do you call an innocent civilian?
      A. A criminal who hasn't broken the law yet.

      --
      Yeah, right.
    5. Re:A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The use of the word "fellow" seems to suggest a similarly-cynical view on Europe.

    6. Re:A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider that they are tracking everyone. Which means everyone is a suspect. And they wouldn't be suspects if they weren't guilty.

      ..and thus is the circular logic of the Facist bastards running our countries, now. The logical outcome of all this, if left unopposed, is that our so-called "free" countries will become giant prisons/slave camps, and we, the people, are the inmates/slaves. After all, prisoners and slaves don't deserve privacy, do they? And we're all just perpetrators who haven't had the opportunity to commit our future crimes, aren't we? Oh no! You're breaking the speed limit law! You must be in a hurry to commit a terrorist act! Oh, my! You're parked your car illegally! You must have a bomb inside it! What, no bomb? Then you must be practicing for when you illegally park your car bomb! Better throw you into a windowless cell without due process, do a full body-cavity search, tear your house apart, sift through your bank account and other financial activity, interrogate and threaten your friends and family (because by association they must also be incipient criminals, can't let that happen!) and then when your life is in ruins, dump you unceremoniously onto the street like so much trash and not even so much as an apology -- because we know you're a criminal, you just covered your tracks too well -- this time.

      Go ahead, mod me down to -1, Troll or something. It's not like I haven't been trying to warn you people for years and years now.

    7. Re:A proposition... by davester666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Q. What do you call an innocent civilian?
      A. A criminal who hasn't been convicted yet.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    8. Re:A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A. A criminal who hasn't been booked yet.

    9. Re:A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot. Kettle. Black.

    10. Re:A proposition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's almost laughable about it is that it's a right-wing party who's put this law into place, even though 5 years ago, before they were elected, they were screaming bloody murder about the centre-left party intruding into everyone's lives. Just two days ago, I heard the Prime Minister explain how there were just a few "left wingers" who didn't want government surveillance.

  2. Keeping up with the Joneses by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously post-Snowden, they realise how much they need to catch up to the American standard.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    1. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Obviously post-Snowden, they realise how much they need to catch up to the American standard.

      If Antonio Prohias were still alive he would have a field day with this.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by lightknight · · Score: 1
      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      the American standard

      That's ok, you can get American Standards pretty easily these days.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re: Keeping up with the Joneses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could just check Facebook or Instagram then. No need for a new bill

    5. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by pinkstuff · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is actually the American standard... The NSA is likely subsidising the GCSB

    6. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by Torvac · · Score: 1

      most likely. same with germany, suddenly its no problem for the government anymore, full take on everything is legit they said. (yes its obviously no problem for them that their emails get read by the nsa, wtf ?). something big is coming, it wont be funny.

    7. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As funny as this is, it is also probably the truth. New Zealand is one of the five eyes nations. We have a couple of listening posts around the country. Our defense and intelligence policies are very much driven by obligations to allies Australia and the US.

      The US also does take an interest in NZ laws relating to terrorism etc. Actually NZ is probably not special here, the US probably takes an interest in such laws around the world.

      It's quite possible that our government was simply told that this law or something similar was required by their largest and most important ally, and therefore NZ public opinion was never going to matter.

    8. Re:Keeping up with the Joneses by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 1

      Err no. They are being TOLD to catch up by america by america.

      This particular party has always wanted to cosy up to the US and do whatever it wants. In this case they want access to the global spying the US is doing on everyone. There is a secret "free" trade agreement being created and signed up to at this time also which undoubtedly has something to do with it..

      However.

      This bill will enable the cops/govt departments to get access to the GCSB intelligence and for that not to be an offence This bill was in response to the public finding out they have been doing this illegally this whole time. So their response has been to change the law to make it legal and to continue with "business as usual" and much more than likely far worse than before without the fear of any legal ramifications.

      And primarily the access they are after is the GCSB's intelligence sharing they do with the US.

      This is a cut and dried assault on the freedom of the NZ public. And don't be fooled by the "87%" against the bill. NZ is a nation of sheep and has been for a long long time now. They will do what the shepherd says when the dogs start barking. (and this bill is the sheppard hiring its first pit bull.)

      And by sheep I mean sheeple.

  3. Borg, James Borg by BreakBad · · Score: 1

    n/t

  4. Codename? by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

    US have a lot of names for their surveillance programs, which one will be the one from New Zealand? The Eye of Sauron?

    1. Re:Codename? by somersault · · Score: 2

      I'd go with Rocks

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Codename? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sheep?

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sheep
      Description: 1,2,4,5,6,7 etc applies here.

    3. Re:Codename? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      The Black sheep ones

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  5. Can't allow foreign agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to smuggle away the keel design for the next America's Cup.

    1. Re:Can't allow foreign agents by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Screw keel designs, they just need some way of stopping the boats from breaking in anything above 18kts.

    2. Re: Can't allow foreign agents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 18 knots of wind, TNZ is hitting 44 knots of boat speed! Unreal.

  6. Public opinion doesn't matter by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For a long time, governments of modern democracies have been rather afraid of public opinion and the press, and have avoided doing things that would result in protests and opposition.

    Then at some point they realized they could bribe the press, and that the public's opinion doesn't really matter, nor does it amount to much or lead to much violence in a society of over-fed TV addicts. Today's protesters are all bark and no bite, and the powers-that-be know it full well. So they do whatever the fuck they want without even trying to be discreet about it.

    That's where we're at right now. Welcome to a new form of tyranny, in which dictators are "democrats" who resort on soothing words and the complicity of mass-media to pussify the populace and keep it in check. Violence and outright dictatorship is so yesteryear...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's even worse.

      In a traditional dictatorship, most of the population suffers and stand behind a revolution. The revolution itself is justifiable.

      In modern demotatorships (sic, democracy + dictatorship), most of the population doesn't know that they suffer or they don't care. A revolution would be considered by this sheep as terror and unjustifiable 'cause "democracy" and "the system works, just elect someone else".

      Most people are happy that they have beer, watch TV, drive a car, fuck their heart out and can comment and rage on the internet (hello!).
      Everything else is irrelevant for most people.

      Modern dictatorship is much worse than before. Much more hideous and hidden behind mindless consuming.

      That's the system. Peasants we are. Working 40 years for the system till death. Mindless consuming. And being absolutely powerless. Rinse, repeat.

    2. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if it had something to do with better security at public events and better investigative techniques. As recently as around WW1 it was common for unpopular politicians to be assassinated and the killer could get away with it without too much trouble. Over time it became harder to kill politicians and get away with it, until we're in today's situation where there are anti-sniper teams around these appearances, the buildings the politicians reside in are armored and it's practically impossible. They're safer from the angry masses than the 1700s French aristocracy could have ever dreamed of. They have nothing to fear.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      Assassination isn't part of the democratic process.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    4. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      It certainly shouldn't be, but maybe it was acting as a hackish fix for a very flawed democracy and giving a better outcome than the system would have had without it. Now we have no way to address overwhelming public disapproval, especially in the face of limited alternatives (another big flaw in current democracies).

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by RevDisk · · Score: 1

      You must not be familiar with the democratic process or history.

    6. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but we don't have a democratic process. I'm not sure about New Zealand, but the US is a plutocracy now.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    7. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      Then at some point they realized they could take over the press, and that the public could be manipulated more effectively than ever before

      FTFY.

    8. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      A plutocracy? I didn't catch that. What is the minimum income level to vote now?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    9. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You must not be familiar with the concept of voting, and the law.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    10. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violence and outright dictatorship is so yesteryear...

      Except in the Middle East.

    11. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      "When in the course of Human events......"

    12. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by davecb · · Score: 2

      This is what Plato wrote about, and the Romans invented a cool variant on: "bread and circuses". The latter led to / supported tyranny, the Empire.

      Plato observed a cycle in Greek city-states: aristocracy to timocracy, to an oligarchy, to a democracy, to tyranny and thence back to aristocracy.

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    13. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assassination: the vote that counts!

    14. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. You're just rationalizing the fact that you're too goddamn lazy to do anything by telling yourself it is hopeless.

    15. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      If public disapproval truly is overwhelming rather than rhetorical, it can either be fixed at the next election or by recall election (if available). If you want to try to portray assassination as a legitimate tool of redress in a democratic system you should probably stop complaining about "rule of law" issues.

      Democracy is known to be a flawed system of government, it is the worst, other than all the rest.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    16. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that, and I can't help but agree a good bit. However, I'd like to see this full scope. I'd like to see a great action by way of PRISM. I want to see it move. Until then I think it's all a scam to make people afraid of BIG BROTHER. This type of hype is exactly what bullying is all about. I say the emperor has no clothes, prove me wrong.

    17. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      A plutocracy? I didn't catch that. What is the minimum income level to vote now?

      Theres a minimum income level to be voted for; have to pay for the advertising. Its not cheap.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    18. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by whoever57 · · Score: 2

      You must not be familiar with the concept of voting, and the law.

      You must not be familiar with how the 2-party state really works.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    19. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      For a long time, governments of modern democracies have been rather afraid of public opinion and the press, and have avoided doing things that would result in protests and opposition.

      When would that have been, exactly? The first US president to shove an unpopular policy (a whiskey tax) down the throats of the masses was George Washington - leading to one of the 2 times in US history that an American president has actually commanded troops as president. The French revolutionary governments were so unpopular that they decided to scrap the whole thing and put Napoleon in charge. The Italians, Germans, and Romanians tried it in the 1920's and bungled it so badly that many thought the fascists were an improvement.

      Democracies are probably more responsive to their people than dictatorships, but that's not saying much. An interesting point someone made recently: In order to become president of Iran, a candidate has to be accepted by the unelected ayatollahs. In order to become president of the US, a candidate has to be accepted by the unelected Wall St tycoons. How different are those systems, really?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    20. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congress has a 10% approval rate and a 90% re-election rate, because the system has been gerrymandered to hell. No amount of elections will solve the problems we're seeing today, because the elected choose who gets to vote for them.

    21. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      They have nothing to fear.

      But plenty to hide. :-)

    22. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In order to become president of Iran, a candidate has to be accepted by the unelected ayatollahs. In order to become president of the US, a candidate has to be accepted by the unelected Wall St tycoons. How different are those systems, really?

      The difference is that one only appears to be true because the voters make it true. American voters are lazy. Lazy in how they vote, lazy in their political understanding and lazy in how they spend their dollars. This allows corruption to continue. I don't believe that they can change the system overnight but as long as they want to "vote for the lesser of two evils" or "not waste their vote on third parties" this kind of abuse will continue.

      Good on the politicians. They figured out how to keep Americans in check and keep their eye on corporations and not the way the government whips them into feeding the meat grinder. So many people already think that the politicians are the unwitting victims of corporate dollars. It's like shooting fish in a barrel to the DC elite. Americans deserve what they get for being lazy.

    23. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Meh, they only hide things that would cause annoying and time-consuming public outrage. It's a convenience thing.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    24. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by citizenr · · Score: 1

      Today's protesters are all bark and no bite

      Not everywhere, protests in France often turn into riots for example.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    25. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The press is clueless to begin with, idiotic presidential scandals is as far as they are willing to go, now the press is still reporting on things they can only "confirm" and refuse to print anything that would cause attention. The whole terrorism threat the communism threat, helping feed the stereo types of race, promoting the KKK, ect ect..they didn't bother to fully investigate and ask "Why this, Why that, it seems to be BS, lets report the truth or what will keep people thinking".
      They labeled the civil rights protestors, hippies, as communists and terrorists only interested in disrupting and destroying democracy.

      And with religion, and patriotism, and schools, you can brainwash people into buying into this "we need to protect the country BS" so while the press are brainless they can still use other means to get there zombies (citizens) to fall in line and march with your government.

      You want a person who will report something that matters you have to look thru Hustler magazines, and Larry Flynt, George Carlin, Bill kicks who reported and warned of this happening years ago, scratch that, it was happening in those days as well. What cracks me up was how the press/media only gave a shit when they realized how popular Larry would become by reporting things these morons refused to touch, all coming out claiming to support there rights to being a free press.

      Obviously not all the stories or articles ran in Hustler were remotely truthful, some were spoof stories design to give the middle finger to the very people society would die for, or follow off a mountain side into the abyss, or the establishment.

    26. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by pinkstuff · · Score: 3, Informative

      OP here. New Zealand has a Proportional Representation based governement. This makes it less of a two horse race as every vote counts. Quite minor parties will have representation in government. There are also quite small spending caps for campaigning leading up to elections. For the most part it works quite well, and I still believe it is one of the most truely democratic countries.

      This is what makes all of this so much worse, it is the first time in living memory there has been such strong public opposition to a bill and it has been passed anyway. A recent poll suggests 89% of New Zealanders oppose the bill.

      There is more than meets the eye here, the way the Prime Minister is forcing this through is very fishy to me, it seems like he is being pushed into it. Here is a quote from a recent press conference:

      “Prime Minister, numerous legal jurors have informed us publicly that they disagree with you wholeheartedly, that you are taking broad powers, which would allow you to invade privacyand you are saying that all those people are wrong” a journalist said to Key. “Correct,” the Prime Minister said before immediately interrupting the rest of the question by asking, “Is this a question buddy?”

      So, the Human Rights Commission, the Law Society and the general population don't want the bill to pass, and yet it does (just).

    27. Re: Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the democratic process has been subverted, it most certainly is.

    28. Re: Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, but just before prism the press headlines were about gun control because some we-the-people are the root cause why governmemt had to exist. The case that these agressors are suddenly governing is the democraty known vuln, godwin point. But there is no innovative defense against competitors other than innovative secret weapons or better intelligence or communism communion. Since communism is dead until the second return, we are condemned to intelligence race, toward a singularity. The fact that intelligence is kept secret sounds like an Elysium warning, "It's a class warfare, my class is winning, but they shouldn't be" w. Buffet.

    29. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plutocracy means the wealthy are the rulers. You do not have any realistic chance of putting up a candidate who is not wealthy in their own right, or does not represent the wealthy. America the greatest democracy that money can buy.

      That's a nice rant, but the US is and has always been a Republic, not a Democracy.

    30. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, given the horrifying raise of Kimbo the Hutt to prominence in New Zealand (some morons actually supported the idea of declaring him "Kiwi of the year"), we are half a step away from plutocracy.
      Of course Kim Smitz.com has received a lot of support because of his anti-american stance shared by many Kiwis, but still the trend of supporting the douchebag for his offer of cheap goods fallen off the back of the truck and a promise of investment in fast internet, is very disturbing.

    31. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by alexo · · Score: 1

      What prevents an opposition party from promising to revoke that law if they win the elections?

    32. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember how it goes. Something about soap box, ballot box, ammo box? Ammo box doesn't have to be just about armed revolution, you know. The problem is, it's used as a legitimate tool by those with money, not nearly as much by those who are oppressed.

    33. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing (in fact I think they may already have promised to do so) except the key opposition party being a bunch of disorganised idiots at the moment - they don't have a strong leader and they are basically still polling around 20% lower than the ruling party. They have missed several major opportunities to capitalise on National's mistakes and they'd need a lot of slightly nutty smaller parties to agree with them to form a government.

    34. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You must not be familiar with how literal blood feuds work. That is no way to run a country. If you think it will be an improvement, you are sadly mistaken. You've been carried away by rhetoric into the fever swamp.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    35. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Those in that position of control only get there beause most of us want to live in a dream world.

    36. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I have just asked around the table who was able to watch videos at either tvnz news or tv3 news about the GCSB saga and found that out of three people, two had tried and neither were able to watch any of the clips. Admittedly, this is in a localised area but in my case I have been unable to watch any news video on the GCSB debate for the past two weeks. They just failed to load. Everything else seems to load fine but not videos related to the GCSB. Now I feel paranoid. It is probably a local problem, but has anyone else in NZ had this?

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    37. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      I think it may be worse than that. The debate was purely based around email, giving an available back down position of saying 'not email' but leaving in everything else. Our publicly owned power companies are being sold off, firstly under the excuse of the financial crisis and now another one......for what? We are forecast to hit 5% growth. Post crisis just about every bank in NZ has had record profits, post the Chistchurch earthquake both the rebuilder and the largest insurer in NZ have posted record profits. Our last PM got a nice job overseas after losing, what is the bet this one does as well.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    38. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      That's a nice rant, but the US is and has always been a Republic, not a Democracy.

      These terms are not mutually exclusive. Generally speaking, Western Republics are democracies.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    39. Re:Public opinion doesn't matter by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

      You are right, the problem is they are idiots. I honestly think Labour would have passed the bill if they were in power, and then National would be protesting it - it is all just a big puppet show. Even if the they wouldn't passed it, they would have made some other clamitous mistake - I have no faith in them at present. The question is, as a voter, who do you vote for in 2014? Time to become a politician I think.

  7. First world problems. by sd4f · · Score: 2

    Living in the first world is starting to make me feel slightly enslaved. More or less my existence is limited by what our elected overlords have deemed permissible. I think now I get the futurama quote of "I don't want to live on this planet anymore". I certainly don't like living in a state of Australia where the constitution states that the parliament can make a law for whatever reason it wishes (with a couple of minor exclusions).

    This form of representative democracy is in effect tyranny and more importantly treasonous, it is slowly relegating us to serfdom

    1. Re:First world problems. by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The real question is what are we going to do about it? I'm getting increasingly interested in the political process - I've written my MP and the opposite candidate about my views on these things. I've told them my vote is contingent on a roll-back on policies such as this (along with airport scanners).

      I'm starting with the soap box, and the ballot box will soon follow. We'll see how many boxes it takes until we see change. Part of the problem with the West is that we've lost the realisation that change is possible and is driven by public choice. We get the government we deserve, and I am damned well going to make my vote in September count.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:First world problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I tried to get a bunch of folks to put on anonymous masks, pick up a vacuum cleaner and start vacuuming everything they could find of everyones desks, in the street, passersby, to get the point across that we should sanitize before the GCSB does. The sad reality that no one seems to acknowledge is by the time this law change is repealed we will be data mined to Pike River. It won't matter anymore. Get secure about your shit. Where's David Lange when you need him. David Shearer is a wimp and everyone is too poorly informed.

    3. Re:First world problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote Green!

      Captcha: vetoed

    4. Re:First world problems. by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      The real question is what are we going to do about it? I'm getting increasingly interested in the political process - I've written my MP and the opposite candidate about my views on these things. I've told them my vote is contingent on a roll-back on policies such as this (along with airport scanners).

      All that accomplished was to push you up the list of subversives to keep an eye on. This is why Lenin and Alexander Hamilton used pseudonyms.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    5. Re:First world problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egyptian here.
      I hear you bro. Your first world problem is rough indeed.
      \sarcasm

    6. Re:First world problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already going to. Unfortunately, the green candidate in town won't win the seat, but they get my party vote.

    7. Re:First world problems. by Xarvh · · Score: 1

      True that.
      We all agree we have a huge problem, but we don't seem to have any way of solving it.

      What I think could work, but with lots of efforts and time, is to take back politics from below.
      Take part in your local politics, where you as an individual can make a difference: run, support a better candidate or just keep a close eye on what your representatives are doing.
      Start cleaning up there: this will make your fellow citizens feel more empowered and will hinder the careers of dishonest politicians wannabes.

      I wonder if it would be possible to set up a town-sized liquid democracy, for example.

  8. Necessary Amendments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Term limits, including for justices.
    2. Repealing Amendment 17 and returning the election of senators to state legislatures
    3. A congressional supermajority to override Supreme Court decisions (overruling what could be a stacked court)
    4. Spending limit based on GDP
    5. Taxation capped at 15%
    6. Limiting the commerce clause, and strengthening private property rights
    7. Power of states to override a federal statute by a three-fifths vote.

    1. Re:Necessary Amendments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of that is applicable to NZ, mate.

      We don't have Senators, States,Congress , a Supreme Court etc

    2. Re:Necessary Amendments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you are from the bible belt?

    3. Re:Necessary Amendments by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      No, but they will do exactly what the US tells them to do and we do have Senators, States,Congress , a Supreme Court etc

    4. Re:Necessary Amendments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess you are from the bible belt?"

      That is more properly called the Arc of Republican Poverty. It's amazing how people can be convinced to vote against their own best interests...

  9. Catch up on what the neighbours are watching by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Q: Do they get a gun?
    A: No, the army has got the gun this week and it's the turn of the police next week.

    To be a bit more serious they are probably only catching up on what Australia and the US are getting out of NZ communications via the Australian company Telstra that owns most of the NZ communication networks now. Telstra have already admitted that they give US agencies access to their networks without a warrant.

    1. Re: Catch up on what the neighbours are watching by oob · · Score: 2

      Telstra was only ever a minor player in the NZ telecommunications market.

      And last year, they sold the entirety of their operation to Vodafone New Zealand.

    2. Re: Catch up on what the neighbours are watching by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Minor? They bought the largest ISP in New Zealand and completely screwed it up so badly I had all kinds of weird DNS hassles sending email to a few companies in NZ.

    3. Re: Catch up on what the neighbours are watching by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 1

      Which ISP was that? They have never owned nor operated the largest ISP. That honour has gone to Telecom New Zealand (no relation to Telstra) for at least the past decade.

    4. Re: Catch up on what the neighbours are watching by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Which was bought out when Sol Trujillo was running Telstra.

  10. Apparently they have a reason by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Al Qaeda-Trained Terrorists in New Zealand, Prime Minister Says

    Earlier this month, as the United States rushed to shutter embassies in response to a terrorist threat, New Zealand's prime minister made a remarkable but largely overlooked assertion. According to John Key, there are al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula-trained individuals at large in his country.

    "In New Zealand there are people who've been trained for al-Qaeda camps who operate out of New Zealand, who are in contact with people overseas, who have gone off to Yemen and other countries to train," he told a radio program in New Zealand on Aug. 1. "Some are still offshore and some are in New Zealand."

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:Apparently they have a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The only terrorists we have had in NZ were French.

      Remember the Rainbow Warrior

    2. Re:Apparently they have a reason by Cenan · · Score: 1

      How would they know that if they don't have enough spying powers to know that?

      --
      ... whatever ...
    3. Re:Apparently they have a reason by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what. Fuck 'em. Life is a bit dangerous, time to accept that and stop pissing away rights and stop jumping at every shadow the government points at. The terrorists don't actually do much damage, just spread fear; Hence the name... You're far more likely to die in an auto accident or of heart disease... Where's all the fear of automobiles and fast food? War is what causes damage, that and all the stupid fear-mongering.

      Protip: There were no WMDs. The Red Scare was just fear. A Threat Narrative is what's used to manufacture consent, it doesn't have to be truthful, just scary. The governments and media are the biggest terrorist, depending on what word you use to mean "the spread of terror to achieve political goals". So, yeah, you can't turn on a TV without seeing a terrorist. Big Fucking Deal.

    4. Re:Apparently they have a reason by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      They've come for the sheep!

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    5. Re:Apparently they have a reason by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Once you travel to Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia or a few other such places for any reason, you immediately become one of the most suspicious people on the planet. Few things could raise a bigger red flag. The "terrorists" are probably just middle-easterners visiting their families on vacation.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Apparently they have a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What bugs me more is that Key's conversation with Banks is private, but anything and everything I do should not be. Why not? Because we can trust John Key, even though he's a two-faced lying probable sociopath.

    7. Re:Apparently they have a reason by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      You're far more likely to die in an auto accident or of heart disease... Where's all the fear of automobiles and fast food?

      Indeed. About 3000 people have died from terrorism *since* 2001 10 times more people die (PDF warning) *each year* by suicide. The numbers and justifications for all this "yeahbut think of teh terroristss!!" malarkey is just that. Malarkey. Malarkey based on irrational fear, scooped up and eaten by a drama staved public.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    8. Re:Apparently they have a reason by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Nope! Turns out, Senator McCarthy was right. There really were Communists in the State Department. But they did such a job on him that his name entered our language as a synonym for falsehood, which sadly continues yet today. When will Hollywood come out with a movie that shows the truth?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Apparently they have a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Maybe Dalton Trumbo can write the screenplay. I hear he's good.

    10. Re:Apparently they have a reason by melikamp · · Score: 1

      You really cracked this problem. Wow. Now if only we could figure out how to explain basic facts to at least a quarter of all people in the world, we'd be set.

    11. Re:Apparently they have a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So invade the Arabian Peninsula and wipe out the Wahabbists.

    12. Re:Apparently they have a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's always the communists, a.k.a. someone with a dissenting political view. It's never the sociopaths, who game the system to get everything they can. When they get to the top of the system, they realise they'd like more - a lot more - and change the system to suit that end. Rinse, repeat, lose a bit more. Keep it up for long enough, and you lose everything while they gain everything.

      It's not the communists.

  11. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't really news anymore. If a government decided NOT to grant themselves highly abusable new powers, now THAT would be news.

  12. ammo subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need ammo subsidies for high volume purchasers and clubs - to encourage gun safety and accuracy. This is both a public safety measures, a critical national defense objective already codified in law, and "for the kids".

    A further measure, a lifetime tax credit for people who lawfully shoot and kill career criminals in self defense.. The scope credit would be indexed to the stiff's past record of recidivism and violence.

    1. Re: ammo subsidies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it like condom policy for ammo to prevent gun violence, and like co2 tax policy for reducing criminals ? It emphasizes there is no serious endeavour for these key topics.

  13. So much for retiring there by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    *removes New Zealand from Top 5 places I want to retire to*

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    1. Re:So much for retiring there by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      *removes New Zealand from Top 5 places I want to retire to*

      Have you got a working Top 5 of places which don't have this? Because I'm having a hard time thinking of them, and I'd dearly love to know. :(

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:So much for retiring there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesnt seem to be ANY country left on this planet who doesnt want fuck over its people.

    3. Re:So much for retiring there by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He just values his privacy and liberty, quaint old concepts that had to be sacrificed for safety in our safer-than-ever world, I know.

      NZ is still in my top 5 list of desirable locations but it's been accelerating down for a while now.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:So much for retiring there by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      *removes New Zealand from Top 5 places I want to retire to*

      As long as you don't mind living on an unstable piece of rock in the middle of nowhere. Honestly, it could just slide into the sea tomorrow or the Taupo supervolcano go off again and pave the whole country under volcanic ash. Again.

      Its not a place to plant long-term roots.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:So much for retiring there by dywolf · · Score: 1

      that a pretty pathetic troll attempt

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    6. Re:So much for retiring there by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Oh it's not that bad. And it's a good sight better than the yearly tornado season I live with now.
      Actually I'd love to retire to a small farm. In NZ, or some other such place. Such as: http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0908/canterbury_plains_2.jpg
      And NZ is at the top of the list because it's got all the climates I like and enjoy, and in such a small area, so can easily get to em. And it's got interesting critters.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    7. Re:So much for retiring there by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Oh it's not that bad. And it's a good sight better than the yearly tornado season I live with now.
      Actually I'd love to retire to a small farm. In NZ, or some other such place. Such as: http://img.scoop.co.nz/stories/images/0908/canterbury_plains_2.jpg
      And NZ is at the top of the list because it's got all the climates I like and enjoy, and in such a small area, so can easily get to em. And it's got interesting critters.

      Tornado season isn't going to wipe out almost all life and make the place uninhabitable for decades, perhaps centuries.

      Christchurch is still in deep shit and that wasn't even a very big quake.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    8. Re:So much for retiring there by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

      As a kiwi, this does sadden me a bit. See my post above, I still think it is one of the most truely democratic and free countries in the world - this is what makes the passing of this bill even more shocking to me.

    9. Re:So much for retiring there by agm · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is that the passing of this bill may see people favour the opposition, and they have a far worse record of infringing our liberties (and yes, I am a New Zealander). The current bunch are still by far the lesser of two evils.

    10. Re:So much for retiring there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You're still dividing this into democratic saviours vs evil socialist neo-commies?

      You're one of the reasons we're in this mess, mate.

      Taxation will not go up on my watch, Key claimed. Oops, accidentally raised GST. That's OK, it'll encourage people to save more, they said. Shame that so many people are living so close to the line that they can't keep up with all the price increases...

      I'm sure that, had it been Labour putting through this bill, you'd be screaming about the evil commies and how they're intruding into our private lives, just like National were over the energy efficient lightbulb legislation a few years ago. I recall that they did nothing bout that, or the no-smacking bill, after getting into power, too.

      No, it's not about party affiliation. We're now much closer to a police state than we were before, and we have you to thank for it.

  14. IF the public reacts violently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It supplies an excuse to REALLY "pacify" a protesting populace (with a B1 Bomber): Violent protest - It's the LAST RESORT, & should always be (when you have nothing to lose and everything to gain only). They'll use it, since those in power will scratch, claw, + scream to keep their power - and won't hesitate to use such methods to "set an example" to others. Then comes martial law for everyone and the FEMA camps get put to use (with their newly acquired 450 million rounds of ammo, and more ordered for them - gosh what do THEY need ammo for? Ask yourself that - it's called planning for civil unrest/revolt). FEMA camps where the barbwire points INWARD (meaning it's a prison, designed to keep people in, not intruders out). Use your head here, think about it. After all - you said it: "they do whatever the fuck they want without even trying to be discreet about it". Trust me - the "powers that be"'s think-tanks have carefully thought all of this out.

    1. Re:IF the public reacts violently? by davecb · · Score: 1

      Check out "responsibility to protect", which is the hook less-insane countries use to hang a duty to not kill your own citizens on (;-))

      --
      davecb@spamcop.net
    2. Re:IF the public reacts violently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. Re:What in NZ is worth monitoring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheep. They are up to something. I saw it in this documentary: Black Sheep. The government is trying to tell me it's just a movie but that's because they are responsible for it!

  16. It makes you wonder? by kurt555gs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Who does all this spying serve? Really. Who?

    --
    * Carthago Delenda Est *
    1. Re:It makes you wonder? by cold+fjord · · Score: 0

      People that avoid this fate: Bali bombing remembered 10 years on

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:It makes you wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who does all this spying serve? Really. Who?

      I will bite. My money is on the money, and whoever holds a greater portion of it, because at the end of the day it is always about cheques and (bank) balances.

    3. Re:It makes you wonder? by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      My money is on the money

      It's money all the way down.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:It makes you wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It serves the very wealthy. The Bush years in the US saw a public sector jobs and a replacement of those jobs with private contractors and mercenaries. This downsizing is typically what is actually meant by "smaller government". The private homeland security sector became massively wealthy and attracted techies who were no longer able to ride the tech bubble.

      These techies created algorithms for facial recognition, sentiment analysis, network analysis and other data analysis concerns. Some money was to be made selling to advertisers, but there was much more to be made selling to government agencies. The agencies, having been starved of manpower, saw these technologies as a way to get their jobs done. The Bush era pushed through a lot of the laws that made adopting these technologies possible and streamlined communications among the agencies so that private sector firms could operate more efficiently (cheaply).

      These private firms are international corporations, and they see the US government as only one client. Every other country is another client. NZ's vote is a corporate handout to these firms.

    5. Re:It makes you wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ask, since you know the answer: them.
      If a good candidate comes along, they can destroy him. If the race is close, they know who to contact to "get out the vote" and put them over the top. To reporters and other such people, they can "make offers they can't refuse" in exchange for favorable coverage and ignoring the nasty stuff. If they have the right statistics, they can re-shape the electorate by "getting tough on crime" by making misdemeanors into felonies (which, coincidentally are disproportionately committed by the voter base of the of the other party) [note: felons cannot vote]. Information is a tool for perpetual power. That is it's only purpose in their hands.
      Fighting terrorism (or any other kind of -ism) indeed - lol.

    6. Re:It makes you wonder? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

    7. Re:It makes you wonder? by Sabriel · · Score: 1

      To excerpt from a post at http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4113917&cid=44632619 I suggest it serves these people:

      Child prostitution -SOMEONE at Dyncorp and the US government for employing them to do so.
      Blackmail -SOMEONE at Pfizer.
      Smuggling -SOMEONE at Chevron.
      Espionage Hilary Clinton and the State department.
      Perjury - James Clapper. Illegal warrantless espionage against US citizens on US soil. And no, FISA is not looking over their shoulder.

      More generally? The kind who think, "Screw the world, got mine, getting more." http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/business/a-shuffle-of-aluminum-but-to-banks-pure-gold.html

  17. Let's just cut to the chase... by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

    Can we just pass a law already that everybody has to walk around naked except for an always-on camera that sends its feed directly to government servers?

    Well, not "everybody," of course. That would be ridiculous. Our wise government officials should be exempt from this law as their privacy is critical for national security.

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Let's just cut to the chase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shudddup already. don't give 'em any ideas.

  18. Re:What in NZ is worth monitoring? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1
    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  19. Astonishing by Sparticus789 · · Score: 1

    I didn't know all of those sheep were so interesting that they warranted expanded surveillance.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
  20. Re:As long as gov't is allowed to redistribute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dogs or pigs, somewhere in between there... People are in between there.

    Indeed, comrade! Those capitalist PIGS are foolish to believe they will ever succeed! It's human nature to seek socialism and collectivism.

  21. It figures by fnj · · Score: 0

    New Zealand. Land of SHEEP.

    Look, I know it's not fair; we haven't had time to see what the backlash might be yet; and my own country is controlled by the same kind of vile fascist animals and is not in open revolt. But you didn't expect me to miss the obvious opening did you?

  22. Stop Pretending to be Subjects! by ilikenwf · · Score: 1

    If it's a real representative government, the average folks of NZ could band together and stop this. Same goes for the USA. Instead of yelling about it, people need to take action and continue yelling about it.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Modern Democratic Process by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    I'm Canadian, but I speak on behalf of those who live in any representative democratic political system.

    This is just about enough. It's one thing to have a representative democratic form of government, but laws should not be passed that the majority do not want - and it shouldn't require a monumental effort to overturn. Apathy is too easily leveraged by those with less than honourable intentions.

    Representative democracies were instituted for a number of fundamental and practical reasons, including the assumption that those with a passion, skill and education in the political process could be trusted as visionaries and representatives to form laws that are in the interest of the public majority, and it was otherwise too costly and, thus, impractical to subject every bill to a public vote. This is no longer the case and is time to empower citizens their fair share of participation in the system.

    In this day and age, there is no reason why we cannot delegate the elected representatives to draft and sponsor bills, but they should not be passed without being first subject to majority vote online before they are invoked as law. If less than 50% respondents fail to approve, it is vetoed.

    Similarly, the public should have the ability to repeal existing laws via a similar process, perhaps backed by a system to empower citizens to campaign for support on any issue.

  25. Poor Bret and Jermaine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess the fence of toothbrushes wasn't keeping them secure enough: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTwAoFR4DuM

  26. What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh?

  27. Couple things. by Dripdry · · Score: 1

    I've been thinking about this.... the whole "scared of everything" generation.

    about 10-15 years ago the hubub was about Helicopter Parents (like mine), or maybe it was just media BS.
    Now I work for someone who is SO paranoid that she won't walk 20 feet outside our building (in a very safe area) after dark without an escort.
    I think the people who were insane about safety finally had their kids go off to college, now they've turned their insanity on the world.

    People seem to be trading everything they can't understand (no time for introspection, there's real work to be done!) for one tiny mote of something they THINK they can understand (mmm safety). It's... very extreme, seemingly, almost maniacal.

    Does it have to do with the fact that we live in Pleasant World now? If no one talks about bad things or death, they can't happen; we rationalize. We fear what we don't discuss/understand; has our fear of death risen to such a degree that we are actually trading OUR LIVES away just so we have an infinitesimally smaller chance of not dying? yikes.

    --
    -
  28. Alternate Answer by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Q. What do you call an innocent civilian?

    A. Backlog.

  29. Just another reason to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    get out of New Zealand and never look back, glad I did.

    Cost of living is stupid, most jobs are underpaid, the public health system is a joke, the goverment has gone on a 'compliance' crusade adding even more layers of inefficiency to make sure it's citizens stay 'safe' and can keep feeding the governments ever increasing appetite for tax dollars. 15% sales tax on **everything** anyone? $9/gallon gasoline? Over inflated house prices around 5 to 7 times the average income? High interest rates? You're welcome to it. Nice scenery.. suppose that's priceless eh.

  30. Best country on earth by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Isn't New Zealand still #1 as they've been for decades? or in the top 2 spot anyhow.

    5-7 times the average income for a house? that isn't so bad.
    $46k in the USA x 5 = $230k

    Electric cars are long overdue... largely delayed due to the cheapo gas in the USA - the largest consumer of cars. 15% sales tax is a bit much... must discourage over consumption... but shifting it to income wouldn't be that popular either... it would be less regressive. Here I was thinking NZ was some left wing Utopia or something; guess not.

    1. Re:Best country on earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask your self why so many New Zealanders leave - mostly for Australia and generally don't come back.

    2. Re:Best country on earth by agm · · Score: 1

      Because Australia isn't afraid to dig wealth out of the ground. In New Zealand we have political parties who want higher wages and increased employment but don't want us to take advantage of our natural resources. While this short-sightedness continues people will flee to Australia.

  31. short-sightedness? by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    That has to be the 1st time I've heard somebody claim that it is short-sighted to NOT build an economy around natural resource extraction!

    Ruin a large area of land permanently just to employ some people for a few generations? Sure there are reasonable levels... except that the current generation is always BIASED for themselves and their children; making it difficult for them to ever be reasonable in the eyes of history. Plus, usually a few people get mega rich from the people's resources. Yeah, I'm dissing mineral rights as a total farce being pulled on the public by the wealthy. Those jobs are not so numerous and often not so great either.

    Population growth increases the demand for resources and.... jobs. NZ should be thinking for the long term and those who don't like it can leave... You can't be the best nation in the world and REMAIN that way if you don't address population growth.