Slashdot Mirror


Dispatch From the Future: Uber To Purchase 2,500 Driverless Cars From Google

First time accepted submitter Dave Jurgensen writes "Uber has said it will be purchasing 2,500 of Google's self driving GX3200 cars to be used around America. They are hoping to have their first set of driverless cars on the road by the end of the year. From the article: 'Uber has committed to invest up to $375 million for a fleet of Google’s GX3200 vehicles, which are the company’s third generation of autonomous driving cars, but the first to be approved for commercial use in the U.S. The deal marks the largest single capital investment that Uber has made to date, and is also the first enterprise deal that Google has struck for its new line of driverless vehicles.'" Update: Yes, this is a piece of speculative fiction.

6 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. Jeez, did you even READ the article? by new+death+barbie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's dateline is 2023. It's fiction. NOT news.

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

  2. Re:Don't wanna be first... by Sasayaki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lots of things. And they will.

    But statistically, it'll probably be better than having humans behind the wheel. Not that this will stop anyone the first time the car backs over a kid, despite their excellent safety record.

    --
    Check out my sci-fi book "Lacuna" at http://goo.gl/MVxX8
  3. Re:Don't wanna be first... by Skater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Given my experience with the idiot drivers on the roads, I'm going to say, "Not much that hasn't already."

  4. Re:worst idea since flying cars by Vanderhoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the GP is right. Reasoning is that if there's one accident where a human is killed the media will exploded with stories of how cars are coming to life and killing everyone that gets near them.

    I can also imagine people who oppose driverless cars will be going to great expense to try and trip them up, causing accidents. There are some people, that no matter how extensive the evidence is that driverless cars kill fewer people by huge margins, are going to try and stop their adoption. So many people are killed by human error while driving it doesn't even make the news anymore, but I guarantee one driverless car accident will be international headlines. Like 3D printers being used to print guns. Forget the fact they can do anything else like printing organs, food or prototyping innovative ideas. OMG they print guns quick start the presses the masses must know of this injustice.

  5. Re:Don't wanna be first... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Agreed, 300,000 miles without an accident isn't that awesome.

    I've probably come close to driving around 300k in about 16 years and I have yet to have an accident. I HAVE had a number of close calls, and I will admit every now and then one of those close calls would have been my fault had there been an accident (legally and realistically).

  6. Re:Don't wanna be first... by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The technology Double Standard.
    If a person does it, they have a particular fault rate, if the rate is low enough they get credited as really good job.
    If a computer does it, and they have a fault rate that exceeds the human fault rate by good factors, and it still fails, the idea is a disaster.

    In general people don't like giving up control, and doesn't like doing the math to see if they are better off.

    The automated driver, has a key advantage, it doesn't get distracted from driving, its primary goal is to get you from point a to point b as safe as possible. It doesn't get distracted by those bad drivers it is just an obstacle to avoid, after it avoided it, it isn't getting all pissy from it. Or if it is stuck in traffic, it will just drive the same without getting stressed about getting late.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.