Slashdot Mirror


US Electrical Grid On the Edge of Failure

ananyo writes "Facebook can lose a few users and remain a perfectly stable network, but where the national grid is concerned, simple geography dictates that it is always just a few transmission lines from collapse, according to a mathematical study of spatial networks. The upshot of the study is that spatial networks are necessarily dependent on any number of critical nodes whose failure can lead to abrupt — and unpredictable — collapse. The warning comes ten years after a blackout that crippled parts of the midwest and northeastern United States and parts of Canada. In that case, a series of errors resulted in the loss of three transmission lines in Ohio over the course of about an hour. Once the third line went down, the outage cascaded towards the coast, cutting power to some 50 million people. The authors say that this outage is an example of the inherent instability the study describes. But others question whether the team's conclusions can really be extrapolated to the real world. 'The problem is that this doesn't reflect the physics of how the power grid operates,' says Jeff Dagle, an electrical engineer at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Washington, who served on the government task force that investigated the 2003 outage."

293 comments

  1. Wrong analogy by halexists · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So facebook could probably lose a few servers is probably the more apt analogy, yes?

    1. Re:Wrong analogy by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it needs to involve cars. All analogies, especially those pertaining to something technical, must always be reduced to cars.

    2. Re:Wrong analogy by halexists · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it needs to involve cars. All analogies, especially those pertaining to something technical, must always be reduced to cars.

      You're right, you're right... my mistake! "Facebook could probably lose a few gas stations and remain a perfectly stable network..."

    3. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Haha yea exactly. That's the like the power grid losing a few houses.

      Either way, I lived through the blackout... it was actually really fun. Block parties everywhere and biking around downtown in the dark. Great experience.

    4. Re:Wrong analogy by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

      The goal for a good analogy should always be to score points and win the game.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:Wrong analogy by tippe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was thinking the same thing. I felt a little shafted, to be honest, during the 2003 blackout. In my area (Southern Ontario) power was restored quite early, before 11:00pm IIRC. I wish that it had lasted a bit longer so that I could appreciate the beautiful night sky a little longer. You don't often see the milky way within city limits... I almost wish they regularly scheduled these sorts of blackouts. It wouldn't hurt us to be reminded once in a while that the centre of the universe is somewhere above our heads, and not in the middle of the city where we live...

    6. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... a car could lose 25% of its wheels and remain a perfectly stable vehicle?

    7. Re:Wrong analogy by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      Citroens of the 70's were *known* for this ability - not sure now, because I now know nothing. I could google, but y'know....

      Citroen, Facebook Edition, heeyaaaaaa

    8. Re: Wrong analogy by oPless · · Score: 0

      Damn.

      So did I.

      More importantly, dear reader, so have YOU

    9. Re:Wrong analogy by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's what every Citroen salesman used to parrot, yes.

      And it's true! (for some models with self-levelling suspension)

      eg. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4HK2nTRvm_s

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:Wrong analogy by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Strictly speaking, the center of the observable universe is wherever the observer happens to be at that moment.

    11. Re:Wrong analogy by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought it was to get +5 Insightful. Achievement Unlocked!

    12. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The power company would like nothing better then that, the reason is the can make more money when your house/home/apt/ whatever, powers backup.

      If I remember right there is a tremendous power surge or spike in starting up the power to your home/business yap yap, (you get the idea) and that draws a lot more usage. Not to mention when you turn everything back on (even if it has a standby which in itself uses 60-70% power). I cant remember and I had a citation on this but lost it, it was a really respected site too, not just a happenstance web site.

      I think the report only points out what some already know the infrastructure of the country (US) is terrible and not getting any better with these moron Republicans playing russian roulette with budget cuts Just to spite the Democrats, the Democrats would be doing the same so I am not just pointing out the idiocy of one party. And its how these cuts are being implemented.

      I leave in a rural area but the surrounding kills are cities, and then we have to deal with neighbors yard lights, and the street lights, and when we do get a power outage, usually from a storm and what not, it is to cloudy to see anything!!! A little aggravating not to see a clear night sky in pitch black..

    13. Re:Wrong analogy by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try living through a blackout when your home is on the upper floors of a TALL (30+ stories) apartment building. Walking up those stairs after a long work day (and an even longer commute) on a hot summer day was /not/ a fun experience. In the dark, no less. Emergency generators for the elevators were, apparently, too much of an expense. And those batteries in the emergency lighting fixtures only last a few hours...

      And I couldn't even get online to bitch about it once I got home! I mean, really; it was like living in the 20th century!

    14. Re:Wrong analogy by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      The fibre backhaul between data-centers being cut is a better analogy.

      Sections of power plants (most have multiple generators, etc.) are taken offline frequently for maintenance.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    15. Re:Wrong analogy by Megane · · Score: 1

      How about this: it's rush hour, and everybody is bumper to bumper. But they're still somehow managing to go 30 MPH. Then a squirrel runs across the road in front of a blonde driver. LIKE OHMIGOD! She hits the brakes, and causes a 100-car pile-up accident.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    16. Re: Wrong analogy by andreas.hummelbrunne · · Score: 1

      Well THANKS! Now I lost it, too

    17. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in the future, only Apples servers that run on solar power will be running and all the others dark...lol

      Smart, very smart!

    18. Re:Wrong analogy by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, the center of the observable universe has no correlation to the actual center of the actual universe - presuming such a thing exists.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    19. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You love in Ontario. Just drive north for a few hours and you can enjoy all the night sky you like!

      Blackouts like these risk life (first thing I can think of are people needing refrigerated medicine, but there's plenty more), not a good idea to have them just so you don't have to drive a little bit when you want to fulfill your fantasy.

    20. Re:Wrong analogy by tippe · · Score: 3, Informative

      The inrush current when powering on a device (even for something as simple as a lightbulb) from an off state is indeed higher than its steady-state consumption. However, the transient lasts so briefly for most devices (that you would have in your house) that the additional power lost (due to the inrush) probably only amounts to a few seconds worth of actual steady-state operation. In other words, as long as the power failure is reasonably long (a few seconds at least), there will be a net reduction in your power use. For big factories with large electric motors and machinery that require time to spin up, the story is probably a little different... The bigger issue, which you alluded to, is all of your devices (that were in standby before the power failure) coming up to full power once power is restored. [Aside: I have a NAS and a server at home that fall under this category: most of the time they are in low power standby (unless I'm using them), but they'll power up to 100% following a power failure. For those devices, a power failure shorter than at least 1 hour means I might have to pay more for power than I would have otherwise.]

      Plus, I'm also willing to bet that your power meter, even if it's a "smart" one, isn't capable of measuring instantaneous current fast enough to detect the full magnitude of the inrush current. It might not even detect it at all, meaning that quite contrary to the idea of the power company making money off you following a power failure, they might actually be losing it. On top of that, the inrush current that occurs after power is restored does put strain on the power distribution and generation equipment, so I'll bet the power company don't see the switching of power on and off as an opportunity to make money off of us.

    21. Re:Wrong analogy by OakDragon · · Score: 2

      A car could lose 100% of its wheels an be extremely stable.

    22. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      A bad analogy is like a leaky screwdriver. (been playing Krater)

    23. Re:Wrong analogy by DarkTempes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Or two weeks without power in a southern state's summer heat after a hurricane...

      Deadly.

    24. Re:Wrong analogy by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Either way, I lived through the blackout... it was actually really fun. Block parties everywhere and biking around downtown in the dark. Great experience.

      What?!?!?!?

      Parties?!

      I thought the end result of losing power was total anarchy and lawlessness and if you don't have your guns a-blazing, prepare to get completely robbed of anything and everything.

      Society's supposed to break down and cannibalization is supposed to start as the unwashed masses start to realize that without electricity, they have no more life and must wander the streets aimlessly wreaking havoc...

    25. Re:Wrong analogy by holophrastic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You did it wrong. I was living in Toronto at the time. Apartment building or not, we just didn't go home. We all banded together to fight a much bigger problem than darkness and stairs. Bars everywhere couldn't keep the beer cold.

      Seriously, local bars and pubs were giving away free beer. You've never seen a more instantly-friendly megalopolis.

    26. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

      Wherever you're standing is the center of the observable universe in your frame of reference, and from where we are you can't tell where the 'center' would actually be.

    27. Re:Wrong analogy by stephathome · · Score: 1

      Yes, but first you party. There will be time for anarchy later. Priorities!

    28. Re:Wrong analogy by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      can it be Reaper drones instead?

      'cos if the power goes (yeah OK they *might* have backup generators but a tank of diesel can only last so long), then those things will fly round in a circle until they run out of fuel, then crash.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    29. Re:Wrong analogy by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      the 2CV6 could run at 40mph on three wheels. Of course, that's assuming it was pointing down a hill with a tailwind at the moment the wheel fell off...

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    30. Re:Wrong analogy by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I've done this thought experiment and ended up disappearing into my own bellybutton.

      An observer standing at the edge of *your* observable universe (13someodd billion light years away from your space) would also see 13 billion light years in any direction. Drawing a straight line between you and him and carrying it 13 billion light years to the far edge of his observable universe and an observer there would also see thirteen billion light years in any direction. Assuming the straight line is in fact straight as the literal definition goes (ie it never meets itself), then the universe is demonstrably infinite by a simple rinse and repeat.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    31. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strictly speaking, the actual center of the actual universe has no effect on day-to-day life of any observer, apart from those observers wasting their time observing the actual center of the actual universe.

    32. Re:Wrong analogy by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      19 days - Been there,done that. The lack of power was a minor annoyance. The Martial Law put in place due to the power outage was the real ass kicker. Cops at every intersection, arresting people on the spot and impounding their cars if they were out after 8pm.

    33. Re:Wrong analogy by bdwebb · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you're in your car, right? You and 5 others, also in their cars, are pulling this train of big rigs right? Your new tow rope snaps and puts more tension on the others' ropes. Sally in car 4 has an old tow rope that her dad gave her and it is frayed and can't handle the tension so it also snaps (and hits an old lady in the face, killing her - but that's beside the point). The added tension from 2 failed tow ropes causes a cascade effect and all the remaining ropes snap and send the entire big rig train into the enormous gorge that just appeared in my story.

      Here's the kicker; one of the big rigs was carrying a nuke which explodes and kills EVERYONE...JUST LIKE THE POWER GRID. It's science.

      The moral of the story is that Sally is a bitch for using a shitty tow rope and is responsible for killing not only the old lady but everyone else. Also, what the hell happened to your new tow rope and why did it snap first? You need to get some higher quality emergency roadside equipment. Oh wait...you're dead. Fucking Sally.

    34. Re:Wrong analogy by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      We all banded together to fight a much bigger problem than darkness and stairs. Bars everywhere couldn't keep the beer cold.

      Ah, I take it Toronto's not in Germany then.

      Bayesian Geography is self correcting...

    35. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Unless, of course, you are connected by brain caps to someone else.

    36. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phew! Saved!

    37. Re:Wrong analogy by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... a car could lose 25% of its wheels and remain a perfectly stable vehicle?

      Yup.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    38. Re:Wrong analogy by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Try living through a blackout when your home is on the upper floors of a TALL (30+ stories) apartment building. Walking up those stairs after a long work day (and an even longer commute) on a hot summer day was /not/ a fun experience

      Okay, going UP is hard...

      But you now have an excuse for going DOWN the stairs in a toboggan!!!

      In the dark, no less.

      Does the door-man seize all your electronics before letting you in, to ensure you don't bring a flashlight along with you, or anything else that might reduce the challenge?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    39. Re:Wrong analogy by tippe · · Score: 3, Funny

      A car could lose 25% of its wheel nuts and still remain a perfectly stable vehicle (provided that wheel nut loss was spread out evenly across all wheels). Reminds me of a joke:

      A motorist had a flat tire in front of an insane asylum. He took the wheel off, but when he stood up he tipped over the hubcap containing the bolts, spilling them all down a sewer drain.

      A patient, looking through the fence, suggested that the man take one bolt from
      the remaining three wheels to hold the fourth wheel in place until he could get to a service station.

      The motorist thanked him profusely and said, “I don’t know why you are in that place.”

      The patient said, “I’m in here for being crazy, not for being stupid.”

    40. Re:Wrong analogy by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's only infinite in the sense that the Earth is infinite because you can keep traveling in any given direction and never find the end.

    41. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dog lived to be 19. That's 67 in car-years.

    42. Re:Wrong analogy by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

      A pilot asked me if a helicopter could lift a 4 ton object if it had 4 x two-ton capable cables. 2x4=8 which is double the load weight. Not a bad engineering fudge factor, right? Wrong. The vagueries of the system are such that it is likely that each cable will at times have to carry the entire load, so each rope has to be at least 4 ton capable. Statics are actually dynamics, in the real world.

      --
      "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
    43. Re: Wrong analogy by Misterfixit · · Score: 0

      Well we can consider anarchy, but doesn't everyone have Doomsday List? Like OMG I sure do and for sure parties are up there in the scheme of things, but my enemies list is lengthy, and I'll be quite busy with cutting, chopping and dicing and general defenestration of said listees. When my arms tire, there remains the napalm. On the other hand, before this gets modded as an asshat rant, think about what you REALLY want to do when society goes crazy! I'll bet that motion picture screen behind your closed eyelids is busy right now, yes?

      --
      nar
    44. Re:Wrong analogy by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      ok, try this for a thought experiment: you can prove the Earth is round by drawing a straight chalk line behind you as you walk, Eventually you'll come across the start of your chalk line after walking some 24,859-24,901 miles.

      Is the Universe flat or curved?

      Take the thought experiment I described in my last post, and carry it on until you either:
        - hit the edge of the Universe (you could be a while if the Universe is both flat and infinite)

      or:

      - meet the first point on your line.

      If the second condition is met, that's proof that the Universe is both curved and finite in the same way that chalking a straight line on Earth until it meets itself describes the edge of the section, ie the circumference, proving the Earth is round.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    45. Re:Wrong analogy by sjames · · Score: 1

      Unlike the Earth, chaining the observers won't help you for the universe. By the time that guy at the edge of the observable universe (from your perspective) can send you his observations, you will be able to see them for yourself. You will always be at the center of anything you can observe directly or indirectly.

      If you see the same thing in opposite directions, you will have proof of a closed universe, but the absence of that observation doesn't prove an open universe (it might just be bigger than you can observe at all but still closed or it might be open).

    46. Re:Wrong analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rock climber here! Yes, each "rope" must be at least 4 ton capable (which indicates a static line, so let's assume you don't shockload any of those cables). If your object is 4 tons, and assuming those ropes are specified with their own safety factor, you can use some bracket capable of individually withstanding the 4 ton load at each end (say, a heavy duty D-ring or something). Now, you pair the cables. True, you lose two dimensions of stability in flight, but (I'm not a pilot, &) you've effectively created two roughly 4 ton rated ropes--as long as the two ropes in a pair always get weighted evenly (and this is a good assumption because we're ignoring shockloading).

  2. Coincidentally... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...I was talking to someone on a forum about a hot-air rework station he bought. It's basically a glorified hair-dryer. Every time he turns it on the lights flicker, and then they dim periodically as the heater turns on/off.

    American house wiring seems to be terrible. There also seem to be a lot of barriers to setting up solar feed-in systems. The concept of a smart grid is unheard of.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:Coincidentally... by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Informative

      American house wiring seems to be terrible.

      Based off of a sample size of 1. Nice generalization.

    2. Re:Coincidentally... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      American house wiring runs on 110V, which is low enough for voltage drop to be a serious issue.

      The same thing happens in EU house wiring too, but only with very, very high-power appliances like power showers.

    3. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Solar panels is un-American.
      Try to set up a gas-driven backup generator first. You will get tons of support and advice. Then try to add some solar panels "to help a bit when it is running over capacity"
      Then you might be allowed to sneak over to full solar as long as the gas-driven generator is clearly visible.

    4. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American house wiring seems to be terrible

      With a sample size of one, how can you go wrong?

      There also seem to be a lot of barriers to setting up solar feed-in systems

      Like not enough sunlight in many parts of the country, high capital cost, maintenance costs, etc. Reality is a bitch.

      The concept of a smart grid is unheard of

      Highly experimental. Not exactly the stuff you want to use daily. And given the lax security of most SCADA systems, I don't think you really want it.

    5. Re:Coincidentally... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      a hot-air rework station he bought. It's basically a glorified hair-dryer.

      Yep, my hairdryer goes up to 300 degrees celcius.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Coincidentally... by khallow · · Score: 5, Informative

      American house wiring runs on 110V, which is low enough for voltage drop to be a serious issue.

      Any voltage is low enough for voltage drop to be a serious issue.

    7. Re:Coincidentally... by khallow · · Score: 0

      The concept of a smart grid is unheard of.

      Nor needed. It's remarkable how people think every minor advance in technology will yield large dividends. Delivering electricity to a wall socket is just not that hard a problem to where a "smart" system is going to do a lot better than a "dumb" system.

    8. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But does it go up to 11?

    9. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If there is enough sunlight in Germany and the Netherlands then there is enough sun in the whole of the U.S.A. except maybe for Alaska, and I said maybe.

    10. Re:Coincidentally... by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      Hey, I mine my own coal and use a coal-powered steam generator to refine oil to gasoline, then I use the gas-driven generator to power my flashlight, which directs a beam at my solar panel, which boosts the volume on my crystal radio. If I drop acid, the tinny sound seems stereo-ish.

      I hope to win a ribbon at the science fair.

      cheers,

    11. Re:Coincidentally... by Bigby · · Score: 1

      Is there really enough sun? Is the TCO of those, including cost of subsidies, really outweighing how much electricity could have been produced by power plant? I am going wager "not even close", considering much sunnier non-American non-oil countries aren't actively pursuing solar panels. Including Italy to the south.

    12. Re:Coincidentally... by Yebyen · · Score: 1

      OK, but for plenty of devices, isn't it more true that the actual amount of power delivered is more important?

      For instance: I got one of these newfangled bitcoin miners that someone with a similar name to one of the company officials (this is where you get your help, I know right?) says draws about 27w on average. He says it peaks at about 35w and you should make sure your wall-wart budgets close to 40w in case of internal losses that weren't measured.

      The wall-wart they send is a 13VDC-6A which is of course 78w, only I bought two and only one power cord from the batch actually works.

      I found that my laptop has a power supply that provides 19V-3.42A (65w) and it works fine, anecdotal. I am not an electrician, I am just an amateur physicist who knows P=iv, and I've been advised that the devices are rated for up to 40V but to run with that high of voltage long-term may cause some harm. But 19V should be fine. I've been advised. By someone who talked to the engineer, at least. The bad wall-wart was providing an unstable 17V (I haven't opened it up because I wouldn't know what I was looking at, but I'd assume there's something wrong inside.)

      So, explain yourself please, with a car analogy if you want, when I can go between 19V to 13V on some devices with no problems seemingly as long as adequate power is supplied, how can it be that any voltage is low enough for voltage drop to be a serious issue?

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    13. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue has more to do with builders being cheap and lazy so they try to put as many lights and outlets as possible on a single circuit. Some old houses can be real bad, I had a friend whose ranch home built in the 1950's turned out to have nearly every room on the ground floor going back to the same breaker, we discovered that when his sister plugged in a vacuum cleaner and plunged us into darkness despite being on the other end of the house.

    14. Re:Coincidentally... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      not enough sunlight in many parts of the country

      Actually most of the USA gets more sun than Germany but they are building out their solar capacity at record speed.

      high capital cost, maintenance costs, etc

      In case you missed it, the price of solar cells has fallen off a cliff in the last few years. And some companies will install the system for no money down, then sell you electricity at a rate lower than the utility.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    15. Re:Coincidentally... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      A mere 3 volt drop on a 120v circuit will cause visible light flicker. And house wiring is not the only possible cause.

    16. Re: Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers have internal voltage regulators that allow them to operate on a range of input voltages.

    17. Re:Coincidentally... by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Then it's not worth glorifying it.

      --
      bickerdyke
    18. Re:Coincidentally... by bickerdyke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Delivering electricity to a socket isn't hard.

      Delivering electricity at constant voltage and frequency is already hard.

      Delivering electricity at constant voltage and frequency in a grid where a few wandering clouds and a gust of wind create production spikes is definitly hard.

      --
      bickerdyke
    19. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most important sample size.

    20. Re:Coincidentally... by xenobyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Based off of a sample size of 1. Nice generalization.

      Hey! That's one better than some of the climate change theories!

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    21. Re:Coincidentally... by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      If there is enough sunlight in Germany and the Netherlands then there is enough sun in the whole of the U.S.A. except maybe for Alaska, and I said maybe.

      What about wind power?

    22. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he's wrong. Voltage drop occurs because the wiring is shit from cheap ass builders. I lived in a building that was built in the 80s possibly 70s. Lights never dimmed when the dryer or washing machine started up.

      Contrast this to the current condo I'm renting built in the early 2000s. Lights flicker when the dryer starts up. Every time.

    23. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.platts.com/latest-news/electric-power/london/german-coal-fired-power-rises-above-50-in-first-26089429

      The U.S. produces 40% of its power from coal, and that figure it dropping like a rock.

    24. Re:Coincidentally... by Rockoon · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In case YOU missed it, Germans with their record breaking solar and wind production pay over twice as much for electricity as the average American. The record they are also breaking is how well they can spin their inefficiency to make their policies look efficient.

      German Efficiency, even more of a myth than ever before.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    25. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solar panels is un-American.

      Why are all these high school dropouts visiting a nerd site??

    26. Re:Coincidentally... by Shoten · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Delivering electricity to a socket isn't hard.

      Delivering electricity at constant voltage and frequency is already hard.

      Delivering electricity at constant voltage and frequency in a grid where a few wandering clouds and a gust of wind create production spikes is definitly hard.

      You missed two other factors...

      Delivering electricity at constant voltage and frequency in a grid where a few wandering clouds and a gust of wind create *unpredictable* production spikes and drops, and where the source of some of the generation assets is hundreds of miles from the distribution points it needs to get to, is hard.

      Lots of people like to talk about how much sun the US gets, and how much space there is to put up wind farms. But they don't realize a few things. One, the best places for PV farms and wind farms are far, far from population centers...and that means that utilities have to figure out how to manage VARS over those distances which is still not a problem that's entirely been solved. T. Boone Pickens had to bail on his whole wind farm venture in the Southeast because of this. And two, while the cost of PV panels (as would be put on the roof of a home of business) has dropped significantly, the majority of the cost of an on-premise solar installation is the anti-islanding gear that ensures the safety of any linemen who show up to deal with a power outage, assuming that only the end of the break in a line that leads back to the rest of the larger grid is live. And the cost of that gear has not changed much at all.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    27. Re:Coincidentally... by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      (I know this was meant as a troll/joke but you're hitting the nail)

      No. They have the sample size of "1 earth". Exactly "1 earth". Of course that's due to the lack of spare earths that we could compare ours too. But it is exactly what makes this whole subject statistically "challenging".

      --
      bickerdyke
    28. Re:Coincidentally... by dkf · · Score: 2

      American house wiring seems to be terrible.

      Based off of a sample size of 1. Nice generalization.

      Well, I've observed the problem at multiple locations in the US and none in the EU. Still anecdotal, but a quick bayesian analysis does indicate that assuming that there's some kind of issue in the US. I've also had it described to me as being due to the use of different wiring methodologies, but couldn't verify that from personal knowledge. I suppose the effect could be relatively amplified due to the lower voltage and consequently larger currents involved, which would make any resistive load in the wiring have a disproportionately larger effect.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    29. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Venus and Mars are the other 2 samples we have

    30. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian and American electrical systems -always- dim when you put a heavy load on the system anywhere beyond where on the same electrical distribution panel.

      My parents hottub does that, the vacuum, even the microwave will do it. If you are unlucky enough to have electric baseboard heating (pretty much everywhere hydroelectricity is cheap) chances are you also don't have air conditioning, or if you do it's a window unit that has the same problem.

      If you have computer stuff, buy a UPS and plug all that gear into that. There's always the possibility of you either blowing the fuse/tripping the breaker of everything else plugged into that circuit or even that distribution box.

      As for Solar, Geothermal, and Wind. There are plenty of places for it, just it's not economically viable until Coal is made to be more expensive than nuclear from regulations or simple carbon trading schemes. Geothermal in particular could power the entire US just by tapping volcanic vents (or making them.) Just the "cheap" way of doing it would rapidly deplete ground water. Though why not just use sea water? Oh water vapor is also a greenhouse gas.

      Personally my opinion is to replace coal/nuclear with Geothermal, and as a beneficial side effect it to desalinize sea water to keep sea levels form rising. Won't do anything about de-acidifying it unless we throw the brine back into the ocean with a slightly basic pH. The salt needs to stay in the ocean since depleting it would just make problems worse. Geothermal can do base load.

      Wind and Solar can take up peak and storage loads. Solar capacity is largely wasted in the US. Go look at google maps at any city in north america and you'll see very little in the way of solar panels, and anything built since 1980 probably is mostly glass... thus succumbs to solar-heating. I don't understand why anyone would want to live in one of these units since they'd have to be air conditioned every day of the year.

    31. Re:Coincidentally... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Imagine that, lights on a light circuit, heavy appliances on their own circuit...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    32. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For arbitrary values of "voltage drop", it can be a serious issue.

      If your car has a 40 liter fuel tank (see, I'm working in metric!) or a 20 liter fuel tank, being low on fuel is concern, it's just that the meaning of "low on fuel" is different.

    33. Re:Coincidentally... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      glorified hair dryer... Are you that much of a moron? Please go ahead and put your hand in that air stream.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:Coincidentally... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      If the home is built by the typical zero skill contractor then yes. there are issues inherent in the design.
      They use 14 gauge wire instead of 12 gague to save money and cut corners. Then they chain a LOT of outlets instead of home running. Then they use undersized distribution panels and order undersized service because they dont want to run the proper wire for 200 amp service to the street connection point.

      In the 1920's most homes were built to be as cheap as possible. Today they skimp on electrical for stupid things like marble countertops.

      If you do not demand they do it right instead of installing to code you get a home that has good electrical that will last 100 years.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    35. Re:Coincidentally... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most of Europe (and much of the world) pays more for electricity than the average American. So what? The fact remains that in much of the USA it is already economical to install a solar system. And as time goes by, that trend is going to continue.

      But the real game changer will be the advent of affordable, grid-level storage, which is just around the corner. In particular, Khosla Ventures is backing two novel technologies that are expected to hit the market around the end of next year. One is the liquid metal battery that came from a research project at MIT. The other is a new twist on compressed air storage that uses a type of water carburetor to achieve isothermal compression. Both of these offer cheap, simple, reliable electricity storage.

      As the grid becomes more distributed and "islandable" it will naturally be more robust. And storage is a key enabler to make that happen.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    36. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, based on your single observation, all electrical wiring in American homes is terrible???

      Cripes! Try actually researching wiring a house for electricity! The US and Canada are the forerunners in home safety. And solar, forget it. The battery storage required for solar electricity is more harmful to the environment than modern clean coal, natural gas, and nuclear.

      Tell your friend to get the help of a licensed electrician.

    37. Re:Coincidentally... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

      Delivering electricity at constant voltage and frequency in a grid where a few wandering clouds and a gust of wind create production spikes is definitly hard.
      No it is not hard at all.
      For that you have special forcast systems (weather prognosis systems). In other words you very accurately know how much power a wind plant or a solar plant will deliever in the next quarter hour and the following 3 quarters (that is the show ahead frame you use for scheduling your power plants). And yes: I actually worked in that area for one of the biggest German power companies. Oops, was that bold?

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    38. Re:Coincidentally... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hm, american electricity prices: http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a obviously in $ cents.

      A link that compares several countries (in german, but the countries should be easy to read) prices in dollar cents:
      http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/13020/umfrage/strompreise-in-ausgewaehlten-laendern/

      German electricity prices according to wikipedia however are 25 EURO cent.

      Pretty strange, as far as I recall I pay 17 EURO cent per kWh.

      So you are right: you pay less per kWh in the USA: However you use between 4 to 10 times the electricity a German household or person does. So bottom line you pay far more than we do.

      You know efficiency can be defined arbitrarily. You seem to define it on "cost per kWh" we define it on "consumed kWh".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    39. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many devices internally regulate their voltage to compensate for brownouts or unstable wall warts. Perhaps your device was internally regulating down to 12V, with a low-dropout DC regulator. Regulators drop the voltage, but do not decrease the amp load on the source like a transformer would, instead converting the excess to heat.

      If the device was productively drawing, say, 3A, then the 13 volt supply would be providing 13V*3A = 39W, and the device would be using 12V*3A = 36W, wasting 3W as heat in the regulator. By bumping the input voltage up to 19V, it would still draw 3 amps, and the supply would be providing 19V*3A = 57W, and you'd be wasting 19W as heat, which is significantly more.

      The maximum rating is probably related to how much heat the regulator can dissipate before it self destructs, though in general the more you stress it the shorter its lifespan.

    40. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American house wiring runs on 110V, which is low enough for voltage drop to be a serious issue.

      Any voltage is low enough for voltage drop to be a serious issue.

      Our friends with 220 outlets can push about twice the number of watts thru the same sized wires as we can. When they do resisitve losses are halved at the same power.

    41. Re:Coincidentally... by LourensV · · Score: 1

      Based off of a sample size of 1. Nice generalization.

      Hey! That's one better than some of the climate change theories!

      (I know this was meant as a troll/joke but you're hitting the nail) No. They have the sample size of "1 earth". Exactly "1 earth". Of course that's due to the lack of spare earths that we could compare ours too. But it is exactly what makes this whole subject statistically "challenging".

      If all you could measure was the global average temperature then yes, you'd have one sample of a simple probability distribution, which contains so little information that you can't possibly derive any interesting knowledge from it about a system as complex as our planet. Fortunately, we have measurements of many aspects of that planet, not just temperature but atmospheric composition, ocean temperatures and salinity, albedo, ocean currents and wind, and so on, and not just global averages but measurements localised in space and time. So your one sample is actually a sample of an extremely high-dimensional, highly internally correlated probability distribution, which gives us much more information to work with.

      Now, it's true that we can't do controlled experiments covering the entire Earth, since we don't have a control to compare against. We can do such experiments at a smaller scale and use the results to guide construction of whole-planet models however, and we can exploit the natural variety across our planet to test hypotheses and draw conclusions. So science is still possible, we just need to use different tools. Models make predictions, and if a model predicts our actual sample to be unlikely, we can rightfully conclude that that model is unlikely to be a good description of reality.

      The modeller's challenge is to create a description of a complete planet that accurately describes the characteristics that you're interested in and correctly mimics the emergent behaviour (insofar as is relevant to your research question) of the actual planet, while still being simple enough to fit in a computer, give meaningful and comprehensible results, and have reasonable uncertainty bounds on its predictions given the limited amount of information we have available to feed it. I don't think that having a second Earth would make that job much easier.

    42. Re:Coincidentally... by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 0

      FWIW, Venus and Mars are the other 2 samples we have

      exsept Mars is about what a third s.taller al hundreds of millions of miles farther away from the sun has no magnetosphere. and almost no atmosphere and what little there is is composed of different gases.

      as for Venus it is much closer to the sun and has a wildly different atmospheric composition

      neither planet makes a treasonable comparison.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    43. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grid is the problem, duh. Decentralize.

    44. Re:Coincidentally... by asavage · · Score: 1

      The poster you are commenting on is talking about house wiring. Europeans will have only 1/4 the voltage drop for the same load (as a percent off nominal voltage). This means voltage drop is negligible in an European house. A 2000W load using the smallest wire size allowed (#14 AWG) can go over 45m with less than 3% voltage drop at 240V, but can only go 11m and might trip a 20A breaker if wired with 120V.

    45. Re:Coincidentally... by Yebyen · · Score: 1

      OK, this is the winning car analogy. It's clear to me since I just gassed up my car this morning!

      --
      Restating the obvious since nineteen aught five.
    46. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its not the house wiring, its the house load rating. For houses built before 1970 in the United States most have a 100 A feed. Houses built since then typically have a 200 A feed. This is for a 1500 sqft structure. It is not intended that these structures support commercial or industrial equipment.
      The only barrier to setting up any system is that protective features must be installed to ensure that line workers are not electrocuted by unauthorized backfeeding.

    47. Re:Coincidentally... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Actually EU houses tend to have thicker wiring and outlets can handle more current, so voltage drops are lower. Having more current available used to be safer too because it would guarantee tripping an RCD, but the newer ones don't have that limitation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    48. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course that's due to the lack of spare earths that we could compare ours too

      Stp wasting thse rund letters, there's a shrtage. I ran ut yesterday and can't find any replacements.

    49. Re:Coincidentally... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Our friends with 220 outlets can push about twice the number of watts thru the same sized wires as we can. When they do resisitve losses are halved at the same power.

      And twice something that is near zero is still near zero.

    50. Re:Coincidentally... by phorm · · Score: 1

      Higher overall payment, but a lower per-unit cost.
      If the costs of energy were to increase, then in theory energy-saving would become more desirable (and hopefully more common).

      Eventually it reaches a trade-off where paying extra better home insulation, more efficient appliances, etc is more affordable than paying for extra power.

    51. Re:Coincidentally... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Ok, so one has to use slightly larger wires in a 120 V set up. Not seeing the point.

    52. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T. Boone Pickens bailed on his wind farm venture because he couldn't get the water and mineral rights to land he couldn't just outright buy.

    53. Re:Coincidentally... by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      So you are right: you pay less per kWh in the USA: However you use between 4 to 10 times the electricity a German household or person does. So bottom line you pay far more than we do.

      It's also hotter in most of the US, and air conditioning makes up a huge portion of our energy usage.

    54. Re:Coincidentally... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      You figure sounded high so I thought I'd check the weather.
      Temperatures in most of Germany average about 15 degrees lower than most of the U.S.

      A major component of our electrical usage is air conditioning.

      Other than A/C I run a fridge (which is probably double the size but still rated at about $75 per year) a few LED light fixtures, and one computer which is in sleep mode 16 hours a day.

      But the A/C is huge. My bills run $40-$50 7 months a year, $75 1 month a year, and $130 4 months a year. The difference is entirely A/C.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    55. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I have never heard a German gloating about the efficiency of their implementation. A political need is a more accurate description to the driving force behind it, and there definitely has been and are increasingly problems for the companies implementing the policy as the government support weakens. Dot solar busts are traveling like waves every time governments reduce their support programs.

    56. Re:Coincidentally... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Informative

      P=IV. Good place to start. Now just consider V=IR too, and look at the implications.

      House wiring does have resistance. Not much, but some. So, for the sake of argument, lets assume there is 4ohm in the cables from your transformer to the other side of your house (This is actually rather a lot, but something you might encounter on a long run such as powering an outbuilding), and that you want to run a decently powerful appliance - say, a kettle, 1KW (Make it resistive so we don't have to worry about power factor).

      In a 230V Euro house: P=IV, I=P/V = 1000/230 = 4.35A. Voltage lost in the wiring is thus V=IR=4.35*4=17.4V, or 7.5% of your line voltage. That's not *too* bad - but it'll dim the lights in your shed if you want to make a cup of tea out there.

      Run the same numbers in a 110V American house: P=IV, I=P/V = 1000/110 = 9.09A, voltage lose is V=IR=9.09*4=36V, or 33% of your line voltage. That's... nasty. That's into the territory where your computer crashes and your tea takes too long to boil.

      This is also the reason long-distance transmission is done using very, very high voltages (Between 12KV and 1MV) on overhead pylons. Higher voltage means lower current means less voltage drop, and also means that drop makes up a smaller percentage of your total.

    57. Re:Coincidentally... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Based off of a sample size of 1. Nice generalization.

      Hey! That's one better than some of the climate change theories!

      not a single one of which are based on any actual observations.

      Case in point: CO2 makes up far less than one percent of the atmosphere, yet the AGW crowd would have us believe that the oceans are dying and the plants are suffocating due to indiscriminate burning of fossil fuels and cutting down of forests. Problem with their claims is that CO2 levels are leveled and at a 15-million-year low (source: NOAA/multiple Antarctic ice core surveys). Yes, deforestation is a problem, because deforestation destabilises the topsoil. We only have two inches of topsoil left. The deserts in Africa have quintupled in size since the Industrial Revolution because the paper lobby wants more wood to make paper, and trees take years to mature. Once they're gone, it is very difficult to a: reestablish woods and b: maintain the topsoil. Result? without trees to stabilise the soil and as windbreaks, aerosion is a massive problem across vast tracts of land, and the sand advances. Back to CO2 and the ridiculous claim that plants suffocate on it: plants rely on CO2 to such an extent that as an example, I have a chemical plant in my greenhouse that produces CO2 which actually encourages plants to grow - I have a five week old pumpkin plant that is six feet tall and has a mainstem thicker than my thumb.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    58. Re:Coincidentally... by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      >lower voltage and consequently larger currents involved
      Contributes, and you almost got it. It has nothing to do with the "Grid" and all to do with the last transformer. All US houses are powered with 220Volts, but with a center tap transformer, center leg grounded. What that does, is gives 2 legs any leg to ground is 110Volts, between the 2 legs is 220Volt. Easiest way to picture is we have 4 wires, ground, neutral, +110V, -110V (+/- is not technically accurate, really just 180deg out of phase, ground and neutral are attached at one point, ground wire is only used as a safety...) The neutral leg is usually the problem, it is a smaller gauge wire, with the ground wires connected, in a separate strip, with longer wiring... The 220Volt power is usually rock solid, So when one leg of the 110Volt draws current, it can pull that ground leg up easier (if not wired perfectly.) So then you might have +102VAC on one leg, then -118VAC on the other. That makes lights appear to flicker, even though 220Vac from the grid never wavered.
      The huge advantage of this system, is while we have 220Volt available in every house, similar to rest of the world if desired. But you can never touch one wire and get shocked by more than 110Volts. The only way to get shocked by 220Volt, is to touch one wire with one hand, and the other line voltage at the same time. For some reason though we only run 110V to most of our outlets though.

    59. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if my homeowner's association allowed it, i'd already have solar panels on my house.

    60. Re:Coincidentally... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      Respectfully, the BS 1363 plugs and sockets are widely considered to be the safest in the world. The earth pin, for instance, on the plug is thicker and longer and rotated 90 degrees with respect the other two pins. This creates a key and the earth pin is *always* the first to make a connection. The earth connector on the socket has a shield latch which covers the live and neutral conductors until a plug is inserted. With a correctly wired plug and socket, it is absolutely impossible to connect live to neutral, live to earth, neutral to earth, etc. There is no such thing as a two-pin BS1363 plug, the earth pin (even a full plastic sheath) is absolutely required to release the conductors.

      The BS1363 standard for domestic electrical wiring also specifies the use of ring mains for appliance wiring to sockets, as opposed to radial wiring which is prone to single-point failure not to mention a fire hazard.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    61. Re:Coincidentally... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's an anecdote, but the rest of the thread indicated that it was representative of many US homes. The general consensus was not to worry about it because it was considered normal.

      Living in the UK if that happened I'd unplug it immediately and investigate the fault. Then again we don't allow mixed lighting and appliance socket circuits either here.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    62. Re:Coincidentally... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Then you have defective lights. The specification for U.S. mains voltage is 120 +/- 5% VAC, which means the voltage on the grid is allowed to swing between 114 VAC and 126 VAC. Any hardware that cannot tolerate at least that much swing without seriously misbehaving is unsuitable for real-world use.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    63. Re:Coincidentally... by eth1 · · Score: 1

      As the grid becomes more distributed and "islandable" it will naturally be more robust. And storage is a key enabler to make that happen.

      Like maybe 50 million electric cars spread evenly throughout populated areas?

    64. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 ohms for a cable stretching across your house? Are you using a phone cable as a power cable?

    65. Re:Coincidentally... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2

      Guess I know what I'll be doing this weekend - unscrewing an entire house worth of lighbulbs and taking them back to kmart! Damn defective bulbs. Thanks for the info.

    66. Re:Coincidentally... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You know efficiency can be defined arbitrarily.

      No, it really cannot.

      You can choose different metrics for efficiency, but the definition is not arbitrary at all. For instance, your metric might be 'number of good feelings shared by all' -- but the efficiency would still be non-arbitrarily measured as the trade-off that buys those shared good feelings.

      Until you understand that efficiency is not arbitrary, you should not talk about subjects that deal with efficiency or even economics. Its always about trade-offs, but the measure is never arbitrary (until you come up with a magic 'Instant Free Stuff' button)

      However you use between 4 to 10 times the electricity a German household or person does.

      But why bother thinking about the subject when you can just make stupid declarations like "efficiency is arbitrary." -- its not like anyone has ever lost their life due to inefficiency... oh.. wait.. yeah.. most of the people in the world wouldn't die at such an early age if their local economies were more efficient, but lets not call you a murderer for supporting inefficient policies.. that would be crass way to accurately describe you.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    67. Re:Coincidentally... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is something Amory Lovins has been talking about for several years. However, I reckon these other storage solutions will see faster "uptake" than electric cars in general. Even with Tesla running flat-out, triple-shift production, it will take a while before they start to seriously impact the overall electricity grid. Meanwhile, simple, cheap solutions like Ambri and Lightsail will make energy independence available to the broader public before Elon ever gets his "affordable" 3rd-gen EV on the market.

      This, in turn, will have a salutary effect on the "fitness" of our energy grid.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    68. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You require additional pylons.

    69. Re:Coincidentally... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. Cheap CFLs?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    70. Re:Coincidentally... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The earth pin, for instance, on the plug is thicker and longer and rotated 90 degrees with respect the other two pins.

      It's not like this is magic, for example the more modern US NEMA connections also feature an earth pin that is longer, except it's circular vs being rotated. Because we don't always require the circular ground pins, for appliances where keying matters, we make the neutral blade wider so you still can't plug it in backwards.

      Finally, on the shielding - while our smaller connectors make foreign object intrusion less likely(most butter knives won't make contact, for example), shielded outlets are available as you mention.

      as opposed to radial wiring which is prone to single-point failure not to mention a fire hazard.

      References on this? Because my reading indicates that it's probably more of a electrocution hazard than it saves on fire hazards - and given that at least part of the fire hazard is 'Idiot drills the wire', a ring circuit is actually more likely to cause a fire as well. Plus, well, it says in the wiki that it was used to save on copper, so a ring circuit has each connector using less wire - so if said idiot cuts one of the lines, he may not know because his outlets are still powered, but now the breaker is oversized for the capacity of the circuit, leading to overheating and fire hazard.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    71. Re:Coincidentally... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      But the A/C is huge. My bills run $40-$50 7 months a year, $75 1 month a year, and $130 4 months a year. The difference is entirely A/C.

      How much insulation do you have? How much time/money have you invested in retrofitting your house for passive-solar energy savings?

      Amory Lovins lives in an energy positive house at 9,000ft elev. in the Rockies, and regularly grows bananas in his living room atrium. (And no, his house was not more expensive than a "normal" house to build.)

      $130 4 months a year

      Let's round everything out and just call that $100 per month "A/C penalty" for living in the USA, or $400 per year. Last I checked, that $400 would buy you a thousand sq/ft of insulation.

      And that is just scratching the surface... There are so many things you can do, such as:

      1. Install awnings to shade windows in summer. (and/or plant deciduous trees over windows)
      2. Install rooftop solar (whether PV cells or water heating, doesn't matter, as long as you shade the roof and harvest the insolation)
      3. Install a thermal mass storage/buffer system of some kind. (there are numerous options... water, stone, earth shelter, etc.. pick what works best for your region)
      4. If you're in a cold-winter region, look into a rocket mass heater as an alternate/backup system. (one guy in New England claims to have heated his home on nothing but junk mail last winter.)

      The "trick" is to understand the energy flows in your own home and take control of them for your own benefit.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    72. Re:Coincidentally... by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is: I don't demand that they do it right. Then they instead install it to code (not right apparently.) And in doing so they have installed an electrical system that will last 100 years?

      If they do it right what do I get?

    73. Re:Coincidentally... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      well, no, because a 30A circuit is a 30A circuit whether it's radial or ring, the breaker is the same rating. Generally, 2.5mm^2 Twin & Earth cable is used on ring mains as this is suitable for short runs (ie homes), for longer runs or where a single appliance (eg a cooker or a shower) occupies the circuit due to power demand, 4mm cable is used. 2.5mm cable is normally rated for 240V@20A but because of the setup the circuit is rated at 40A, the ring main is fused at 30A. In any case, the maximum permitted power load on any single ring main circuit is 4.5KW (though as mentioned some shower units which require their own circuits anyway, rate at upwards of 9KWhence are served with a dedicated pair of lines directly from the distribution bus). This accounts for the fact that even though the cable is thinner than the total load capacity of the circuit, a cut anywhere on the circuit is less likely as long as the limits are observed, to cause the embedded cable to heat to the point of ignition. Regulation 433-02-04 of BS 7671 requires that the installed load is distributed around the ring such that no part of the cable exceeds its capacity.

      (citations inline)

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    74. Re:Coincidentally... by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      But why bother thinking about the subject when you can just make stupid declarations like "efficiency is arbitrary.

      Nice way to "respond" without actually "answering" the point.

      most of the people in the world wouldn't die at such an early age if their local economies were more efficient

      Dude! What are you smoking, and where can I get some? Seriously, I'm still trying to work out WTF point you're trying to make here...

      Obviously the "efficiency" of any system depends on how you define the boundaries of that system, and those boundaries are necessarily arbitrary. (Where do you draw the line? ...your house? ...your town? ...your country? ...the earth? ...the solar system? ...the galaxy?) It seems to me that the Parent is defining "efficiency" as how much energy it takes (on average) to have a decent life in "my" country. And he claims a significant advantage over us 'Murcans in this regard.

      But rather than stepping up to defend the home team, you launch into a totally irrelevant rant about markets? ...wait, what??

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    75. Re:Coincidentally... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, his name is Roockoon :D
      What did you expect, hehe.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    76. Re:Coincidentally... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      No, incandescent!

    77. Re:Coincidentally... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Random facts and disconnected analogies are no match for a good blaster.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    78. Re:Coincidentally... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Well, I've observed the problem at multiple locations in the US and none in the EU.

      Clearly you've never see the farce of a household wiring system that the UK uses...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    79. Re:Coincidentally... by electron+sponge · · Score: 1

      Then again we don't allow mixed lighting and appliance socket circuits either here.

      It's not allowed in the US, either.

    80. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An electrical system that will last 1000 years and not have any problems. Plus you will have outlets where you want them, not behind where the couch goes.

    81. Re:Coincidentally... by sjames · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of older homes that were built in an era when hair dryers were big helmet things that probably drew 500 Watts max and nobody had a PC. Nothing in the house was going to be overly bothered by little voltage droops. Their wiring reflects that.

    82. Re:Coincidentally... by nothajan · · Score: 1

      A link that compares several countries (in german, but the countries should be easy to read) prices in dollar cents: http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/13020/umfrage/strompreise-in-ausgewaehlten-laendern/

      Where on earth did they get their figures from? They say Australia pays 11.68c/kWh. I know I pay ~28c/kWh in AU... real figures here: http://www.originenergy.com.au/files/necf/NSW_Electricity_Residential_AusGrid_Standard%20Published%20Rate.PDF

    83. Re:Coincidentally... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Living in the UK if that happened I'd unplug it immediately and investigate the fault

      Indeed, in the UK we use very high rated (30A@240V is typical) socket circuits and lighting is generally* separate. So if a 1KW appliance causes a power dip for lights it's most likely (but not always) indicative of a problem.

      Having said that filament lights are fairly sensitive to voltage changes and the human eye is very sensitive to even very slight light level changes if they happen suddenly. As a result of this it's perfectly possible to notice a change in the lighting even while the voltage remains within accepted limits. It's just that with typical UK wiring it takes something bigger than a SMT rework station to trigger it .

      * Though you do sometimes see a little mixing. Posher houses in the UK often have 2A or 5A sockets on the lighting circuit for lamps controlled by lightswitches and sometimes you see fixed lighting connected via a fused connection unit on a socket circuit (especially if it was an addon).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    84. Re:Coincidentally... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Your eyes are quite unusual. Most people can't see 120 flashes per second (two flashes per 60 Hz cycle).... It must drive you absolutely nuts watching TV. :-)

      In all seriousness, it probably isn't the flickering, but rather vibration of the filament. Is this near a heating duct, perhaps?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    85. Re:Coincidentally... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Generally, 2.5mm^2 Twin & Earth cable is used on ring mains as this is suitable for short runs (ie homes), for longer runs or where a single appliance (eg a cooker or a shower) occupies the circuit due to power demand, 4mm cable is used. 2.5mm cable is normally rated for 240V@20A but because of the setup the circuit is rated at 40A, the ring main is fused at 30A.

      You didn't understand my post at all, did you? I'll admit: I'm a 'field expedient' electrician* without formal training, but I've read the codebook. If you tried to run a ring circuit here in the USA the inspector would look at you like you're crazy.

      The concern is that if you have a ring circuit, you can no longer de-energize the boxes by disconnecting a single set of wires. In addition - 2.5mm cable is rated for 20A. In a ring circuit they 'rate' it at 40A but have you put a 30A breaker on it. Now the NEC presumes people are idiots. Or at least the people who are most at risk for the fires, electrocutions, and shocks they're trying to prevent. The concern is that you have some idiot working the walls and he cuts through one of the ring wires. Because it's a 'ring', you now have two radial branch circuits hooked into the same breaker, each with a max of 20A. It's 'probably' fine if they were cut approximately in the middle, but that's not guaranteed. So let's say all the boxes ended up on one branch. Now you hook up a 30A load to it - where the wires are only rated to 20A in this configuration. Trouble!

      As such, in the USA running multiple sets of lines to power a device is seriously frowned upon; you are to use the right size wires, not multiple runs of smaller wires. You don't run 2 lines of 14 gauge wire for a 20A circuit, you run 1 line of 12 gauge

      Then again, rereading your original mention of it, maybe I'm missing something: Are we talking about the wiring inside the walls, or in the cord hooking the appliance up to the wall? I was looking at the wiring inside the walls, because that's what came up when I searched for your terms.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    86. Re:Coincidentally... by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Opps, forgot to copy the whole post I constructed elsewhere...

      The closest equivalent to 2.5mm is 10 gauge, 12 gauge would be 2.053 mm. 10 gauge is rated up to 30 amps per the NEC. 12 gauge is 25A, but commonly limited to 20A(max for a standard branch circuit of wall outlets). 10 gauge and up is generally for things like dryers, water heaters, stoves and ovens, which are also 220V.

      *Military: The actual electricians are busy elsewhere and I gotta get my shit working. I'm trained on how electricity works more than the electricians, what I lack is the practical training for wiring up a building. I'm more concerned with circuit boards.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    87. Re:Coincidentally... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If the home is built by the typical zero skill contractor then yes. there are issues inherent in the design.
      They use 14 gauge wire instead of 12 gague to save money and cut corners. Then they chain a LOT of outlets instead of home running. Then they use undersized distribution panels and order undersized service because they dont want to run the proper wire for 200 amp service to the street connection point.

      Maybe in Texas, but everywhere else has building codes and building inspectors.

      In the 1920's most homes were built to be as cheap as possible. Today they skimp on electrical for stupid things like marble countertops.

      Again, maybe in Texas, but I owned a home built in 1918. Its two by fours were, unlike today's lumber, actually two inches by four inches. It was the most solid house I've ever lived in. Knob and tube was state of the art back then, putting electricity in houses was for rich people's houses.

      OTOH in 1957 when I was 5 and we moved into a newly-built house, my grandpa (born in 1894) looked around and said "this house won't be here in 20 years, first strong wind and it'll come right down" (he was wrong, it's still standing and the neighborhood is now a ghetto).

      There was a problem with American house wiring in the 1970s when they started using aluminum instead of copper, which caused a whole lot of houses to burn down. Aluminum house wiring is illegal now (and nobody would buy such a house anyway). But in most places, you have to be a certified indoor wireman to wire a house legally.

      I have friends who work construction. It seems where you live you need better government.

    88. Re:Coincidentally... by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The house was built in 1955 and is extremely over-insulated. Something like 2' of cellulose in the attic and the walls are also filled with insulation. Someone apparently took care of that already.

      It also has double-paned windows.
      There's no need for awnings. The house was built before there was air conditioning so it has a deep shady porch and awnings. In fact, I put in a sun tube and some other features to bring light into the house.

      3. is interesting but given a maximum savings of $400 per year, I don't think it would pay off.

      Similar size houses that are not well insulated run $240 to $300 per month.

      I think the biggest change I made was the LED lights. They are low energy PLUS don't pump nearly as much heat into the house.

      I have one solar panel (as an experiment) but the cost/benefit isn't there yet (take a long time to pay off $400).

      I've wondered about putting a shadecloth roof over my regular roof (6" up) to block all the parts not covered by trees from radiant heat. But very little of that heat gets through the attic insulation into the house.

      Anyway- my point is that Germany compares more with the northern united states than the entire united states.

      It's 357k km vs 9.83 million km2; its about the size of three Tennessee's.

      A very large proportion of US population is in Texas which is very hot.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    89. Re:Coincidentally... by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      yeah, I didnt bother because many other people already told you why you were stupid for picking a measure of efficiency on the topic of electricity generation efficiency that amazingly has to do with your local climate instead of anything to do with electricity generation efficiency... but hey... continue being that person that pays twice as much as everyone else (including most of Europe) and finding excuses for why it aint so bad that your government is fucking you that way.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    90. Re:Coincidentally... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Don't know why this is insightful. Funny maybe, pedantic definitely, but insightful no.

      For any given fixed voltage drop the higher the transmission voltage the less you'll be affected. At 110V droping 50V is nearly half of your supply. At 230V it's almost 20%. At 11kV it's a rounding error on the measuring instrument.

      There's a reason many large industrial sites tap up their transformers to run a higher than standard voltage. Where I work we run close to 433V instead of the standard 400V for this very reason. A slight powerdip won't trip any equipment on undervoltage.

    91. Re:Coincidentally... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      We did not talk about electric generation efficiency ...
      So what is your point?

      continue being that person that pays twice as much as everyone else (including most of Europe) ("including most of Europe" is wrong btw).

      It does not matter if I pay twice as much as others. My bill electric bill is one percent of my income. If the price doubles again it is 2% ... why the f**ck should I care about that?

      If the price would increase even more I would attempt to use energy more efficient and reduce my consumption.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    92. Re:Coincidentally... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I don't know.

      I checked a few links and only sent those three because the numbers did not match up ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    93. Re:Coincidentally... by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1

      Assuming the sag is due to another device's high inrush current, it could last way more than 1/120th of a second.

    94. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about -110V?

    95. Re:Coincidentally... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      High Voltage DC will transmit power over huge distances with very little loss. It's already in use all over Europe.

    96. Re:Coincidentally... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      yes, wall wiring. And yes, the same gauge wire is rated differently in the US because the US doesn't usually have ring circuits in domestic situations, hence you guys rate cables at pretty much the maximum current they can handle without actually catching fire - we do it to a more arbitrary measure, that being the maximum current the wire can carry without it getting too warm to handle the insulator.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    97. Re:Coincidentally... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      I keep forgetting to add - the regulations here require that a bus bar is equipped with overcurrent trips and ground leakage AKA Residual Current Devices, which trip in the event of a L-N or L-E short, neutralising the circuit. So if you drill a buried cable, there'll be a L-E short and the RCD will trip, killing the entire circuit. L-N shorts are more likely to occur within appliance casings, for example a transformer going into meltdown. In most cases, this will blow the appliance fuse as well as tripping the overcurrent switch, which in turn will (depending on the design, sometimes an OCD and RCD are cointegrated devices, otherwise there is just one OCD - the main bus switch) either kill just the circuit or the entire bus.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    98. Re:Coincidentally... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Anymore. In the '70s when my house was built it was common. Many bathroom lighting fixtures and some stove hoods even had a built in socket internally wired in parallel with the bulb sockets.

    99. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HVDC links are very helpful in balancing line frequency and voltage. The modern solid-state converters are so much more efficient than the old mercury arc systems that these are actually a good solution for long-distance transmission now.

    100. Re:Coincidentally... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The sag between half-cycles of the 60 Hz signal results in 120 flashes per second. The duration of the inrush is just a period in which the light is not as bright, which means your flicker-fusion threshold is at a higher frequency... but still not as high as 120 Hz, I wouldn't think.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    101. Re:Coincidentally... by Shoten · · Score: 1

      High Voltage DC will transmit power over huge distances with very little loss. It's already in use all over Europe.

      Europe isn't even close to having the distances that are a concern in the US. There are several power companies...FirstEnergy, Xcel, Iberdrola (ironic because it's a power company in the US which is a subsidiary of a European company), Sempra all come to mind...which all have larger operating regions than any state in Europe outside of Russia. Germany, the most industrialized state in Europe, is significantly smaller. The distance between the most ideal wind-farm site that would serve Los Angeles and Los Angeles itself is longer than Germany is wide, and far longer than the distance between any feeder line in all of Europe.

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    102. Re:Coincidentally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P=IE. E, not V. E=IR. E, not V. The E stands for electromotive force.

    103. Re:Coincidentally... by virginiajim · · Score: 1

      Our automatic whole-house generator has anti-islanding gear which is readily available and not expensive.

      Battery technology is improving on many fronts making it a storage that can be strategically located and coupled with various types of intermittent supplies to offset spikes and drops, as well as long-line issues. Perhaps an increasing number of electric cars plugged into the grid will provide another future load-leveling element.

    104. Re:Coincidentally... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      You need to educate yourself on HVDC. The longest HVDC link in the world is currently the Xiangjiaba–Shanghai line at 2,071 km, and it can get a lot longer with minimal power losses.

  3. You clearly don't live in Raleigh by gelfling · · Score: 1

    The capital city of the 9th or 10th largest state. If the wind blows or the rain falls or someone somewhere drives a car and gently brushes a power pole, the power goes out. And our wonderful power company rarely if even even acknowledges there is a power problem and all their lines are busy etc etc etc But thank the lord they pretty much get 8% rate hikes every year.

    1. Re:You clearly don't live in Raleigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget drunks climbing into the substations.

    2. Re: You clearly don't live in Raleigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pics/video or it didn't happen

    3. Re:You clearly don't live in Raleigh by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      That happens everywhere my friend. I think the same story can be told in every major city in North America. If a cloud passes over my neighborhood the power goes off proactively, and I live in the capital of Canada! I never bother to set the clock on my microwave anymore because it never says set. I have gotten used to seeing flashing 12:00 everywhere. I wish manufacturers would stop building useless clocks into every kitchen appliances these days. I wish they could invent a power system that wasn't made out of matchsticks and twine.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    4. Re:You clearly don't live in Raleigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your regional power supplier might need to institute a major tree clearing program. I know the power used to go out around here (lower Michigan) all the time if there was so much as a light breeze. But after a few major incidents (Ice storms, major outages) the regional power company (Consumers Energy) instituted a program of clearing/trimming trees around power lines. Its still not complete but there we hardly ever have a power outage anymore, even heavy storms with gale force winds rarely knock out power.

    5. Re:You clearly don't live in Raleigh by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That happens everywhere my friend.

      It doesn't happen in Springfield, IL. The city owns the power company, and if that sort of shit happened the Mayor would lose the next election in a landslide. Power, water, gas, sewer, wired internet, should all be city-run IMO. The poor folks not in the city have electricity like yours, but what can they do, buy their electricity from someone else? The CEO is beholden to the stockholders and has no reason whater to give a flying fuck about customers. Your "free" market at work.

      Meanwhile Springfield has the best uptime, lowest rates, and best customer service of any power company in Illinois and makes a profit selling power to other companies, keeping our taxes lower.

    6. Re:You clearly don't live in Raleigh by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Or squirrels! Don't forget squirrels.

      (Decades back at NCSU, I was in Bragaw, on the phone, when a squirrel was carbonized in the substation that feeds the entire main campus. Very loud boom and no power for most of the day.)

    7. Re:You clearly don't live in Raleigh by Cramer · · Score: 1

      I don't know what part of Raleigh you live in, but in my parts, the power is quite stable. You may be thinking of Apex... where the city bills you for CP&L services. (they have something like 2 bucket trucks to actually fix anything.)

  4. The story of the 2003 blackout by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Basically, the problem can be almost entirely blamed on FirstEnergy of Ohio. They had, in a matter of hours:
    - A software bug in the monitoring tool.
    - No backup monitoring, so when the first one wasn't started properly there was no way of knowing there was a problem.
    - A plant shutdown due to poor maintenance.
    - Multiple power lines failures due to not cutting back trees as they were supposed to.
    - Alarm systems breaking, that were simply ignored.
    - Utterly failing to notify nearby states that there was a problem so they could prevent it from spreading.

    You'll notice that almost all of these problems would not have happened had they not cut corners wherever they thought they could get away with it. And if the US electric grid is in trouble, I'd have every reason to expect that it was other electric companies doing the same sort of thing.

    Can we get Morgan Freeman on the case?

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    1. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      FirstEnergy is the same group of folks who run JCP&L here in New Jersey. You can ask their customers how competent they were after TS Irene, the freak October 2011 snow storm and Sandy.

    2. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, the problem can be almost entirely blamed on FirstEnergy of Ohio. They had, in a matter of hours:
      - A software bug in the monitoring tool.
      - No backup monitoring, so when the first one wasn't started properly there was no way of knowing there was a problem.
      - A plant shutdown due to poor maintenance.
      - Multiple power lines failures due to not cutting back trees as they were supposed to.
      - Alarm systems breaking, that were simply ignored.
      - Utterly failing to notify nearby states that there was a problem so they could prevent it from spreading.

      You'll notice that almost all of these problems would not have happened had they not cut corners wherever they thought they could get away with it. And if the US electric grid is in trouble, I'd have every reason to expect that it was other electric companies doing the same sort of thing.

      Can we get Morgan Freeman on the case?

      The problem is indeed that every company has the same practices. Why do you think it spread so rapidly outside of the FirstEnergy service area? If anything, the organizing body (Midwest ISO) should shoulder at least half of the blame since they exist _solely_ to prevent that sort of thing from happening.

    3. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that almost all of these problems would not have happened had they not cut corners wherever they thought they could get away with it.

      Exactly, like most problems in the US it all comes down to greed. The CEO(s) want to be paid tens of millions of dollars a year so there is no money left for maintaining or expanding the infrastructure.

    4. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by dj245 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Basically, the problem can be almost entirely blamed on FirstEnergy of Ohio. They had, in a matter of hours: - A software bug in the monitoring tool. - No backup monitoring, so when the first one wasn't started properly there was no way of knowing there was a problem. - A plant shutdown due to poor maintenance. - Multiple power lines failures due to not cutting back trees as they were supposed to. - Alarm systems breaking, that were simply ignored. - Utterly failing to notify nearby states that there was a problem so they could prevent it from spreading.

      You'll notice that almost all of these problems would not have happened had they not cut corners wherever they thought they could get away with it. And if the US electric grid is in trouble, I'd have every reason to expect that it was other electric companies doing the same sort of thing.

      Can we get Morgan Freeman on the case?

      I can tell you that the industry has really taken this event to heart and learned from it. The linked articles are based on some awfully shoddy conclusions- the scientific article is about interconnected networks in a theoretical sense, and not one of the references has anything to do with the electrical grid. The other link is from "somebody" making conclusions about the power grid based on the scientific article. The grid today is not the same grid we had in 2003. For the last 10 years, NERC has been throwing down standards and requirements for electrical production and distribution based on the lessons learned in 2003. NERC's website may make them seem like "recommendations", but for many parts of the country, an power station or transmission company must follow their standards if they wish to do business.

      A failure of the type experienced in 2003 is unlikely to happen. Even if a company such as FirstEnergy makes colossal screwups, rules are in place which make the other parts of the grid more robust to that kind of problem. The chance of a large-scale blackout is reduced in the last 10 years (as opposed to the articles arguments that it is the same, or greater than ever before).

      Think about it. Unless you live on the end of a low-population road, your electricity is probably more reliable than any other service you have. The average electric customer in the US loses service for about 8 hours a year. That is 99.9% reliability. The average Japanese electric customer has 5 minutes of outage per year. That 99.999% reliability sounds great, but those extra 9's cost them dearly. The average TEPCO customer pays about 26-32 cents per KWH. My cost in Connecticut is about 8 cents per KWH. I don't want to pay 3-4 times as much for electricity just to have five 9 reliability. Do you?

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by c0lo · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that almost all of these problems would not have happened had they not cut corners wherever they thought they could get away with it.

      Cut corners? Can (or cannot) get away with it? Buddy, those are heresies.
      It's about the magic dust the free market fairy uses to increase efficiency if only let alone and deregulated.

      (grin)

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    6. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by bickerdyke · · Score: 2

      Intresting chart:

      http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z6409butolt8la_&ctype=c&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=s&met_y=gci_2.07&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&dimp_c=country:world&idim=country:USA:JPN&ifdim=country&ind=false&icfg

      According to this, the quality of the US poer grid is compareable to Slovenia.

      Unfortunately, this one here doesn't have data for the US: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_ele_out_day-energy-electrical-outages-days

      But 8 hours power outage per year sounds more like a developing country to me. (Here: 17min in 2010. Drop from 18min in 2009)

      --
      bickerdyke
    7. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      > If anything, the organizing body (Midwest ISO) should shoulder at least half of the blame since they exist _solely_ to prevent that sort of thing from happening.

      It's called a cascade failure. There is nothing reasonably preventative or reactive that could have been done once 3 outgoing lines from Ohio were down.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    8. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Think about it. Unless you live on the end of a low-population road, your electricity is probably more reliable than any other service you have. The average electric customer in the US loses service for about 8 hours a year. That is 99.9% reliability. The average Japanese electric customer has 5 minutes of outage per year. That 99.999% reliability sounds great, but those extra 9's cost them dearly. The average TEPCO customer pays about 26-32 cents per KWH. My cost in Connecticut is about 8 cents per KWH. I don't want to pay 3-4 times as much for electricity just to have five 9 reliability. Do you?

      I wonder if the increased reliability in Japan has to do with being prone to frequent earthquakes. Consider how other posters have complained about losing power after simple rain or wind, even in parts of some major North American cities. Five-9s reliability in a normal, relatively quake-light year may be the difference in keeping most of the grid running even after a moderate tremor (i.e. nowhere near as extreme as the 2011 quake), or getting it back up and running more quickly.

    9. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do these failures have to cascade?

      Obviously, when a power plant abruptly stops (or the transmission line breaks), the load must be lightened. But that is not a reason for having a cascade failure. Just disconnect some neighbourhoods (or whole cities) until consumption matches the remaining production.

      This way, no need to have power failures everywhere. Remaining power plants keeps going, supplying most of the grid in a stable fashion. Why have a stupid system where one broken plant causes more plants to fail from "too big a burden"? The burden never need to get too big with some preemptive disconnection. Not so fun for those disconnected, but they were about to loose power anyway - and for longer - if there is a cascade of failures.

    10. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by dj245 · · Score: 2

      Intresting chart:

      http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=z6409butolt8la_&ctype=c&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=s&met_y=gci_2.07&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&dimp_c=country:world&idim=country:USA:JPN&ifdim=country&ind=false&icfg

      According to this, the quality of the US poer grid is compareable to Slovenia.

      Unfortunately, this one here doesn't have data for the US: http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_ele_out_day-energy-electrical-outages-days

      But 8 hours power outage per year sounds more like a developing country to me. (Here: 17min in 2010. Drop from 18min in 2009)

      The first chart appears to be an opinion survey- "How would you assess the quality of the electricity supply in your country (lack of interruptions and lack of voltage fluctuations)? [1 = insufficient and suffers frequent interruptions; 7 = sufficient and reliable]". I don't make a habit of dismissing charts completely, but this doesn't seem to be based on actual data about the power system. People in the US have an opinion of their electrical grid which is comparable to the opinion which people living in Slovenia have of their grid. This doesn't mean much to me and could be influenced by any number of factors.

      The source of the second one is the "World Development Indicators database". So it makes sense that 1st world countries are not completely represented in that data. The US average of 8 hours (0.33 days) compares fairly well with a similarly geographically large country such as Russia (2.73 days), or a well-developed industrial power such as Germany (0.23 days).

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    11. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, that is exactly the approach. Since 2003, Midcontinent ISO a.k.a. Midwest ISO (and the other ISOs covering other regions of the country) have spent additional tens or hundreds of millions of dollars beefing up the amount of monitoring, the speed of response, and the amount of information available to the real-time grid operators. If anything goes down (and this is inevitable) the goal is to contain the blackout to a small area and keep everything else running. In 2003, the grid operator didn't figure out what was happening for like an hour, and by then it had cascaded too far to contain. Nowadays, they will know in much less than 5 minutes (within seconds for most problems) and can take action to contain it. Cascading blackouts can still happen, but they are much less likely than 10 years ago, due to the money we've spent on people and technology.

      Posting as A/C because I'm a former Midwest ISO employee. :-)

    12. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Think about it. Unless you live on the end of a low-population road, your electricity is probably more reliable than any other service you have.

      Well, if you compare it to my telephone land line service, not even close. We have NEVER lost our land line connection, ever. (Not that I'd expect the electrical company to match a perfect record) I keep one old corded telephone around that plugs directly into the jack, and no matter what storm we've had (South Jersey) it has never been out of service once in the 21 years I've lived in this house.It's not even an upscale neighborhood. A lot of people -especially techies- think it's stupid and backwards to have a landline these days, but the thing just works, rock solid. And besides, my cell service sucks from the location of my house.

      Funny anecdote: a few years back, we'd lose power or have a bad enough glitch to crash my computer (I finally got a UPS) about every two weeks. It was really getting annoying. PSEG blamed it on squirrels, which I thought was silly. Then one morning, we woke up to hearing a loud bbzzzt, our power stuttered, and a second later, we heard a soft, dull thud outside. We looked out the window, and right across the street was a freshly fried squirrel lying on the sidewalk right below a transformer. No problems since. :)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    13. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      According to this, the quality of the US poer grid is compareable to Slovenia.

      Which sounds bad... until you actually look at the data. Then it looks pretty dang good. But soundbites sweeties! Have to make it sound bad.
       

      But 8 hours power outage per year sounds more like a developing country to me.

      It's always easy to have unreasonable standards.

    14. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      Here: 17min in 2010. Drop from 18min in 2009

      I've had an outage of about five seconds total in the last three years (Denver), so I guess you over there in Greater Assholia are the one with the third world energy supply.

      Since were using anecdotes and all.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    15. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by kevmatic · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of it has to do with population density. I'll betcha a LOT. I assure you that the Japanese, per capita, has a tiny amount of electrical grid wiring compared to the US. We have a ton of people like me living in rural areas, and we have long power lines feeding us. That's a lot more opportunity for a tree to fall and knock out power to a lot of people. You don't think that might account for the .099% difference in reliability?

        In my area the houses are far enough apart that each house has its own transformer. Gives me very stable power, though.

    16. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think electricity is the least reliable utility I have. Water only goes out when the electricity goes out at the pump station (as happened 10 years ago) or there's a water main break (which is rare). Phone stays on even when the power goes out. I've never in my whole life seen a wide-scale natural gas outage.

      dom

    17. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Residential power in California (PG&E) starts at 0.16 / kwh fully loaded for the first 100KWH/month and rises to $0.46/KWH when you're at 300KWH/month or more. This is due to subsidy to central valley air conditioning being borne by the general ratepayer.

    18. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it. Unless you live on the end of a low-population road, your electricity is probably more reliable than any other service you have.

      Your other points are very good. But, thinking about it, my electricity is far less reliable than other utilities. In fact, the only utility I would consider to be less reliable is my Internet Service Provider. Garbage pickup has never missed any of their 52 Wednesdays for any of the last 6 years I've lived in my current house. The gas line has always be pressurized. I've never had water fail to unexpectedly come out of a faucet - there was exactly one 12 hour, planned outage in water delivery in 6 years. And the pipe in the ground has never been less than 100% willing to accept my poop.

      (I don't pay for home phone service, but if I did, it would probably be as bad as the internet service - same pair of crappy companies racing to the bottom on both services.)

      I think what differentiates electricity and internet is that we actually use them nearly 100% of the time we are home (or even aren't home, for refrigeration, air conditioning, large downloads etc.). And therefore we actually notice if they don't have 100% availability. The other utilities I named could be unavailable for 8 consecutive hours and I might not even notice. Hell, up to 20 hours out of a day, I'm not really relying on gas, water or sewer.

      I think it says a lot about humanity how we (many cultures, anyways) have higher expectations of services that are entirely recent, non-essential luxuries than we do of necessities like food and water. I think the only way that we could see that trend reverse is if we ever reach a point where in-home air delivery is wide spread (luxury due to air pollution or necessity due to not living on Earth any more).

    19. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I guess my point was not clear to the first AC is that it is always subject to Cost/Benefit analysis. After 2003, this benefit crystallized and the cost investment finally caught up with what is available in terms of technology. Before 2003, I could definitely see energy companies going, "What me worry?"

      it's easy to forget that the power grid is a very complex web grown organically over generations and is still subject to a lot of modernization.

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
    20. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      I plead guilty on choosing Slovenia as comparision because it soundes the worst, but I'm NOT using anecdotes:

      http://www.verivox.de/nachrichten/pro-jahr-im-durchschnitt-157-minuten-stromausfall-65179.aspx
      It even has details statistics to in- or exclude acts of god as reason for power outage.

      My personal anectodal power outage statistics is pretty similar to yours. (not counting planned downtime for meter exchange)

      And that's why I was shocked by the 8 hours and looked of our stats in the first place.

      --
      bickerdyke
    21. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Come on.. 8 hours without power outage IS bad for a industrial country that has a whole economy relying on electricity.

      And as I didn't pull out the 17min out of thin air, it's quite feasible.

      --
      bickerdyke
    22. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      The source of the second one is the "World Development Indicators database". So it makes sense that 1st world countries are not completely represented in that data. The US average of 8 hours (0.33 days) compares fairly well with a similarly geographically large country such as Russia (2.73 days), or a well-developed industrial power such as Germany (0.23 days).

      Where did you get those 0.23 days for Germany from? Because that's exactly what I looked up and found my 17 minutes.

      http://www.verivox.de/nachrichten/pro-jahr-im-durchschnitt-157-minuten-stromausfall-65179.aspx

      And I start to question the reliability of those statistics. BOTH. 6 hours vs 1/4 hour for the SAME ITEM?

      --
      bickerdyke
    23. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by coolmoose25 · · Score: 1

      I also live in CT, and my experience is exactly the opposite from yours. For years, my house NEVER lost power. Hurricanes, thunderstorms, etc. No outages. It was so reliable that while I wanted to need a back up generator (because I'm a nerd and it would be yet another toy to play with), I could not justify one. My town is a major distribution hub - on a grid map, the town name had the same size font as towns with power plants in them. (Saw this at an NU facility in NH) Bottom line: Power was never an issue for me.

      Then, 2 years ago, things changed. We had two major incidents - the freak October snow storm, and Hurricane Sandy. I lost power both times, and one of those outages ran for 5 days. Some of my friends in the area were out for 10 days. I didn't have a generator then, nor could I buy one last minute. So I went to Harbor Freight and got an inverter. This was a fairly industrial strength inverter - no cigarette outlet to power it - you have to clamp it to the car battery. Knowing this would kill the car battery, I would idle my car while running the inverter. It was able to power my heating plant (gas furnace, baseboard) which wasn't a huge power draw. It ran my fridge throughout the outage, but the fridge didn't like the modified sine wave output and eventually it broke down. Even ran the TV and a light for some of the time so we could get news.

      After a couple of days, I needed gas - I was below half a tank from the idling, and had used up the lawn mower stash. So I went out in search of a gas station that could pump gas. Most of them could not for one of two reasons: Either the power was off, so there were full tanks of gas in the ground, but no way to pump it, or the station had power and they were out of fuel. I managed to find one station near a mall that had power and gas. The line was backed up onto the highway exit ramp. I waited well over an hour, hoping that they wouldn't run out. They didn't. But things were getting pretty hinky. Some cars did U-turns on the road and tried to cut the line. Angry words thrown about. People at the pumps were surly. There was a police car at the station - he was there to provide calm. The whole thing gave me the willies. Thought about bailing, but decided to fill up anyway. They guy in front of me pumped 20 gallons into his Suburban, then he filled up 4 5-Gallon cans. People accused him of hoarding. More angry words and the cop got out of his car and while he didn't draw his weapon, his hand was on it. I filled up my car and got out of dodge.

      Remember - this was TWO DAYS in.

      Since those two storms, I've lost power at least 3 times. I've also acquired a small generator (3500 Watt - 4k max) and have a home made panel that supplied 4 separate 15 amp circuits on it via a small breaker box. It safely distributes 30 amps to those boxes. I can now power my heating plant or window air conditioner, my fridge, some lights and the TV. I ordered a tri-fuel kit that I have yet to install that will let me run the thing on gas, propane, or nat gas. I will be paying a plumber to give me a connection for the nat gas. In the mean time, I have 2 20lb cans of propane available, which lets me run the thing for over 20 hours. I will be buying and storing more.

      Oh yeah - and I'm armed now. Got my pistol permit. And I'm building a pantry of food just in case. Goal is to be able to be off-grid for a year. Doing that over time.

      Don't fool yourselves people... when the power goes out, things go south REALLY fast... it starts a day or two in. After a week, I'm guessing essential services are severely impacted. 2 weeks and people are dying. If you have any doubts, read "One Second After". You'll be horrified to see what we become after a year without power.

      --
      Brawndo: It's what plants crave!
    24. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by dj245 · · Score: 1

      The source of the second one is the "World Development Indicators database". So it makes sense that 1st world countries are not completely represented in that data. The US average of 8 hours (0.33 days) compares fairly well with a similarly geographically large country such as Russia (2.73 days), or a well-developed industrial power such as Germany (0.23 days).

      Where did you get those 0.23 days for Germany from? Because that's exactly what I looked up and found my 17 minutes.

      http://www.verivox.de/nachrichten/pro-jahr-im-durchschnitt-157-minuten-stromausfall-65179.aspx

      And I start to question the reliability of those statistics. BOTH. 6 hours vs 1/4 hour for the SAME ITEM?

      Your previous http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_ele_out_day-energy-electrical-outages-days link lists Germany at 0.23 days in 2005.

      Getting statistics on this is an error prone process anyhow. The US alone has several regional electric grids with minimal ties between them. Then each regional grid feeds into hundreds of local/regional utilities who actually deliver (and sometimes generate) the power. I am a little doubtful that these utilities collect information on every single outage, and especially in a common format. Querying all the utility companies in the US seems implausible. Perhaps they polled a sample of customers, but then they are relying on customer memory which seems like a stupid way to collect this kind of data.

      Other countries often have national grid operators so getting this kind of data might be easier.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    25. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by dj245 · · Score: 1

      Come on.. 8 hours without power outage IS bad for a industrial country that has a whole economy relying on electricity.

      And as I didn't pull out the 17min out of thin air, it's quite feasible.

      8 hours without power over an entire year isn't bad at all. Situations where power is out for more than a few minutes usually coincide with major weather events where businesses, schools, and government are shut down anyway. Oftentimes, roads are impassible and/or it is not safe for linemen to be working on the lines. Maybe the weather is more mild where you live.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    26. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Come on.. 8 hours without power outage IS bad for a industrial country that has a whole economy relying on electricity.

      Considering the size and complexity of the US grid, no, it's not really. And everything is feasible on paper.

    27. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will second the statement of seeing very high reliability out of the phone company. I can't quite say it has been 100%, since I was living in the vicinity of a large earthquake and after the earthquake the phone lines were overloaded, but short of getting overloaded by such events they've always been operational.

    28. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by evilviper · · Score: 1

      According to this, the quality of the US poer grid is compareable to Slovenia.

      That seems a very strange way to spin it... The chart clearly says the US power grid is near the top, and in the middle of EU states, so if the EU states were averaged so the population size was similar, they'd probably match-up similarly to the US.

      With smaller countries, there will be more extremes and outliers. Some will be extremely reliable, while others will be extremely unreliable, and when their overdue big outage comes, it will far more drastically change the numbers.

      But 8 hours power outage per year sounds more like a developing country to me.
      What the hell is wrong with you? YOU POSTED A LINK THAT INCLUDES NUMBERS FOR (ALL) DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, yet you still make idiotic statements like this one...

      Go ahead, check the numbers for China, India, Brazil, or any other developing countries you can come up with. You'll note they're all WAY below the US. This indicates you have no real grasp of the reliability of services in a developing country.

      Put in perspectives, that's one minute of power loss for every 1,000+, and a small of UPSes will ride you through the downtimes. As I've said elsewhere, no power grid will every be 100% reliable, so a modest $100 investment in a tiny portable gasoline fueled engine/generator is cheaper insurance to provide you all your modern conveniences even when the world is falling apart.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    29. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      one outage ten years ago from these issues? doesn't seem a dire problem at all

    30. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Where did you get those 0.23 days for Germany from? Because that's exactly what I looked up and found my 17 minutes.

      http://www.verivox.de/nachrichten/pro-jahr-im-durchschnitt-157-minuten-stromausfall-65179.aspx

      And I start to question the reliability of those statistics. BOTH. 6 hours vs 1/4 hour for the SAME ITEM?

      Your previous http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_ele_out_day-energy-electrical-outages-days link lists Germany at 0.23 days in 2005.

      Ah, ok, But that statistic does NOT give the average time without power per year, but the number of days per year on which a power outage happens.

      OK, let me compile the numbers:

      Numbers of days with power interruptions: Germany 0.23 (source: nationmaster) vs. US ??
      Average time without power per year: US 8 hours (source still unknown) vs Germany 17 minutes (source: verivox article)

      If we combine these numbers: A typical German household can expect a power outage every four years that will last 68 minutes.

      --
      bickerdyke
    31. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Developing country is more like 8 hours power outage per week, if not per day.

    32. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you're kidding, but the free market fairy dust only works on widgets, not on services which require massive infrastructure.

    33. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's that the US tends to use a LOT of overhead wiring. Here in the UK you only really see overhead wiring in the countryside (and power cuts are far more common in the countryside than in urban/suburban areas).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    34. Re:The story of the 2003 blackout by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mh. I'm 31 years old. Lived 29 of those in Germany. I experienced exactly 0 power outages in my life there. Been living in Canada for 2 years and had both scheduled (yesterday actually. WTF?) and unscheduled power outages (4 in total) already.

  5. the greate outage of 2003 by StewBaby2005 · · Score: 1

    I remember it vividly, I was leaving SE Michigan to drive to my home the upper part of lower Michigan. By sheer luck, my home was outside the area affected. Help my decision to work from home permanently.

    1. Re:the greate outage of 2003 by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Fortunately my grid somehow survived most of the 2003 outage... we lost power for maybe 30-60 minutes. Meanwhile, a 20 minute drive to the east or the north were without power for the day or whatever... which stunk because it was hot.

      So we lucked out there; a nice little peninsula of electricity.

      Unfortunately, in the last 2 years we had 2 major storms: Sandy and a freak snow storm. Both of those times took out my town's power for a week each.

  6. Inherently unstable by Ateocinico · · Score: 5, Informative

    As every electrical engineer knows, an AC transmission system is a quadratic-complex system. And in the sense of both the inherent complexity and the complex numbers involved. There is no energy storage in the system (no inertia), has noticeable delays, and it is tightly coupled. Only high redundancy and decoupling can make the system more reliable. But that is costly. Who wants to pay more?

    1. Re:Inherently unstable by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As every electrical engineer knows, an AC transmission system is a quadratic-complex system. And in the sense of both the inherent complexity and the complex numbers involved. There is no energy storage in the system (no inertia), has noticeable delays, and it is tightly coupled. Only high redundancy and decoupling can make the system more reliable. But that is costly. Who wants to pay more?

      The challenge is balancing the system's ability to self-heal with the system's ability to self-destruct. There is no reason that losing 3 transmission lines (out of a dozen running through the corridor) should have done anything more than taken three lines worth of subscriber capacity offline. If the system "let them go dark" there wouldn't have been a cascading failure. Instead, in an attempt to self heal (something that works great for just one or two lines going down) the system self destructed instead. Identifying where the tipping point is and acting before it is reached is the only real barrier to preventing such a large problem from happening again. Shame it's taken 10 years to really understand the problem.

    2. Re:Inherently unstable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lack of imagination, and intelligence. Its no wonder why our civilization keeps moving to our own extinction.

    3. Re:Inherently unstable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price of centralization is this singular or at least low number of failure points.

      Now if we could do the human body does for power generation...that being generate it locally on an as needed basis...large cascade failures would be a thing of the past.

      Solar is the answer for some, others natural gas generators. These combined with batteries, pumped water, or other storage tech could change the way we live.

  7. I know most of you don't live where I do... by neorush · · Score: 4, Informative

    ....but we are used to regular power outages here in Upstate New York. We lose it for several hours monthly and have an automatic backup generator for these purposes. We have a Gas stove, wood fireplace, and oil lamps so even without the generator it would just be darker and the internet would not work. My point is, the northeast blackout proved just how unprepared most Americans are for a power outage. I understand the technical challenges of living on the 30th story of a building are much greater than for my house in the middle of no where, but there are some basic things you can do to function for a few days without power if need be.

    --
    neorush
    1. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      Agreed... I'm usually set quite well up for minor power outages. In my old house we used to lose power a lot because of company a block away kept blowing the lines. It was always for like ~15 minutes a week. So combined with being used to going camping I'd make sure I was prepared for a day or two of no power.

      BUT... I hadn't really prepared for being without power for a week... which happened twice in two years due to storms.

      On a personal level it was just mildly annoying since I had tons of warm clothes, some candles, batteries for flashlights, canned food, and my natural-gas still worked for hot showers and cooking. So it was just annoying.

      But on a macro-level, it REALLY stunk because gas stations ran dry and stores also had no power. I hadn't prepared for THAT. So as the week went on and my gas tank started to run low I was getting concerned since I worked 20 miles away. But I eventually made a trek with my last quarter-tank to the neighboring state and filled up there.

    2. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by hrvatska · · Score: 1

      I live in upstate NY, in the Finger Lakes region. Our power is pretty reliable. There are outages, but nothing like a couple of hours monthly. Two or three times per year we lose power briefly. We lost power for several hours once in the last year. All of our power outages seem to happen during high wind events that cause trees to fall on power lines.

    3. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      Most Americans should be basically unprepared for regular or severe power outages. If the basic utilities are failing enough that it's accepted as a regular thing, shouldn't you be up in arms?

    4. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      I understand the technical challenges of living on the 30th story of a building are much greater than for my house in the middle of no where...

      I would have thought the opposite. A 30 story building can get by with a central standby generator (or central battery/inverter) serving all tenants/condo owners, etc., but there's a greater psychological challenge in that extended outages are rare enough that the money spent installing and maintaining the system seems a waste until it's needed.

    5. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying the article's point isn't valid... I think the country should re-think its grid. If nothing else it would mean lots of jobs for a couple of years. Also... I DO know that in NJ they are re-doing portions of their grid... I see them replacing the high-capacity towers and re-routing things.

      It's a regional thing... America isn't as "bad" as some people make it out to be. In my case, my block (and only my block) would lose power due to a company a couple blocks away overloading something. Until they got in trouble for it and made the correct repairs to their building, and it stopped. That was like 20 years ago.

      Outside of 2 freak storms that took out MANY MANY of our above-ground power lines overnight... the most my area has experienced are minor local outage here-and-there affecting the odd block / street because of a tree falling down due to a heavy storm or something. It's not exactly a common occurrence.

      One of my European friends is under the assumption that we're without power 25% of the time or something based on some reports that get spread around or because they assume some anecdotal evidence of a single town/county with their own issues is a fair representation of the entire country.

      Sure, some places have power issues. I think there are sections of California or something where the demand out-strips the supply... but that's just over there. Also, considering Americans love our air-conditioning and many Europeans don't bother with that... it means a larger strain on the grid in the summer.

    6. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The challenge is not psychological it is economic. Most large buildings are not condos, but contain rented apartments. The owners do not live on site, indeed in most cases the owners are not individuals but a corporation, typically based in another state. The business managers do not especially care if tenants in a another state go without power. Their is no economic incentive to install standby generation.

    7. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear the grid in India is super-unreliable. How do they cope?

    8. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

      Upstate New York is a large and diverse place. I've lived here for 30 years and I could count the memorable power outages on one hand. The power has rarely gone out for me in a mix of city, suburb, and rural locations. When it has, it's almost always been just a few minutes.

      --
      The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
    9. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A 30 story building can get by with a central standby generator (or central battery/inverter) serving all tenants/condo owners, etc"

      A battery serving 30 floors for two or more days? Are you on crack?

      Even a week's worth of fuel on site isn't going to be fun.

    10. Re:I know most of you don't live where I do... by evilviper · · Score: 1

      My point is, the northeast blackout proved just how unprepared most Americans are for a power outage. I understand the technical challenges of living on the 30th story of a building are much greater than for my house in the middle of no where, but there are some basic things you can do to function for a few days without power if need be.

      IMHO, too few people know about CAMPING gear. Just think of it... crazy people VOLUNTARILY go off-grid, in extremely harsh conditions, yet get along quite well.

      They have:
      * good food ($100),
      * plenty of clean water ($40),
      * get hot showers ($10),
      * have an ample supply of power $10,
      * lots of light ($10),
      * plenty of news and entertainment. ($20),
      * modern conveniences ($30),

      etc., etc.

      They even sleep comfortably in -30F degree weather (if you don't mind lugging around a punching bag).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  8. And thats why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we need to stop terrorists from entering our country... now bend back while i search for drugs on your colon.

  9. your local CEO doesn't give a fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you can make this an actual problem in the mind of the stupid fucking corporate class nothing will be done.

  10. And they will blame it on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Syrian Electronic Army

  11. So how long until... by Pollux · · Score: 0

    How long until the US Government censors this paper in the interests of national security?

    Or how long until a commentator on Fox News calls the authors terrorists?

    1. Re:So how long until... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Shareholder value could drop if people work out the next Enron too early?
      National security could be pulled for the power or cooling water needs of new regional NSA sites?
      The US grid seems to be well maintained, well thought out for the big power needs for large scale cold war production and now select tourist sites.
      Long term what was build generations ago and patched up with a view on shareholder return will have to be thought about as populations shift and energy needs change again.
      Smart meters and per device shut off for discounts could be interesting at a local level.
      Solar FIT or NET payments could be reduced with the need for costly home engineering reports or state energy laws.
      So yes expect some data to go dark just due to the pure embarrassment factor.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  12. American infrastructure is old and decrepit by gatkinso · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The reason for this is it wasn't utterly destroyed in WW2.

    You Eurotrash like your fancy relatively modern infrastructure? The Marshall Plan called from 1948 to say you're welcome.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:American infrastructure is old and decrepit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Swiss would like to greet another War-Untouched country, and demonstrate some modern infrastructure.

    2. Re:American infrastructure is old and decrepit by Iconoclasism · · Score: 1

      This sort of rhetoric only kind of works if those countries have failed to update their electrical grids since then; even so, that was 65 years ago and you should probably get over it. The US not updating its own infrastructure is simply inexcusable.

    3. Re:American infrastructure is old and decrepit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sweden, reporting in. In practice there are quite few countries where GP's assertion is even relevant (Germany is a given, but otherwise it's at most partial destruction).

      So, GP is perhaps "informative" as the post is currently modded; just too bad the information in this case does not hold water.

    4. Re:American infrastructure is old and decrepit by ctid · · Score: 1

      How could this post be modded Informative? The only information it contains is that the author of the post is an idiot. Europe was not "utterly destroyed". It's not just one country. Countries were affected differently, depending on where they were with respect to the fighting. We've already heard from Swiss and Swedish readers who live in countries that have working infrastructure despite the fact that they were not "utterly destroyed" in WWII. I didn't reply to this post before because I assumed that the poster was just trolling and that it would get moderated down as soon as a someone with mod points saw it. I'm replying now because it has somehow been moderated up.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    5. Re:American infrastructure is old and decrepit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Eurotrash like your fancy relatively modern infrastructure? The Marshall Plan called from 1948 to say you're welcome.

      Yeah! Just look at Spain, with it's modern electrical distribution system and no black outs, all built with American Dollars!

      Wait, Spain didn't receive any money under the Marshall Plan, you say? Well, I guess you're full of shit then.

    6. Re:American infrastructure is old and decrepit by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, my cousin lives there. that Barcelona blackout of 2007 was a doozy, wasn't it? 153 portable generators placed through the city with their constant loud noise, while it took a month to repair the infrastructure. Too bad they didn't get some Marshall plan love.

  13. 'extrapolated to the real world' by drainbramage · · Score: 1

    Oh, I see.
    An outage that involved 'the midwest and northeastern United States and parts of Canada...cutting power to some 50 million people' WOULD be very hard to extrapolate to the real world.
    Thank you, I thought otherwise on first glance.

    --
    No brain, no pain.
    1. Re:'extrapolated to the real world' by PhamNguyen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could model power outages like dominoes, and my model would also predict that the power system was very unstable, but my model would not actually reflect the "real world physics".

    2. Re:'extrapolated to the real world' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could model power outages like dominoes, and my model would also predict that the power system was very unstable, but my model would not actually reflect the "real world physics".

      Using your model, I found that a little bit of glue would do wonders to stabilize the grid.

  14. Suck It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sincerely,
    Texas

    1. Re:Suck It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ERCOT works, but it probably is one poke from a good blackhat away from destruction...

    2. Re:Suck It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ERCOT works, as long as nobody wants to turn on their airconditioner in the summer.

      Nobody wants to be the guy to build a multimillion dollar power plant just for that one air conditioner so we're expecting our "deregulator" to "deregulate" yet another fee onto the bill so we can all pay for our power masters to ever so kindly build a plant so shit works in the summer.

      Predictions: the fee is collected and distributed to the power generators, who say thanks, award it to their CEOs as a bonus, and give us power brownouts until we agree to double it.

  15. Wardenclyffe Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, it seems like J.P.Morgan should of gone with Nikola Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower after all. Free wireless power and communications is a wonderful idea.

    1. Re:Wardenclyffe Tower by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing this is posted as a joke. Sadly there are many out there who won't realize that and think that Wardenclyffe is a viable solution to needs of today's consumers. They'll claim that The Man(tm) stopped Tesla from bringing us about to a new age of science and technology and that it was dastardly villians like Edison and JP Morgan who have halted human progress.
       
      The cult of Telsa strikes again!

  16. Yup... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been seeing it coming for years. It seems like it would be prudent to have other means of power generation at your house if at all possible. You can get a generator that'll run on LP or natural gas, power your whole house and cut in automatically if there's an outage for less than 10 grand. After a three day outage last winter, this has moved WAY up my list of priorities. If I had an exta few tens of millions sitting around I'd just drop a pebble bed reactor in my back yard and watch the vein in that one neighbor's head just explode! Heh heh heh.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Yup... by swb · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the gold standard is an automatic natural gas generator capable of running the whole house, including central air conditioning (we generally lose power when it's super hot out).

      But these things are like $10k installed, and that's awfully hard to justify when the power goes out twice a year for about 12 hours at a time.

      The LP gas kind seems like the next best choice -- $800 for a Generac 5500 watt model. We usually have at least 20 pounds of propane around the house for the grill and gas firepit, sometimes more, and propane doesn't go bad or leave a goopy carb that keeps the generator from starting.

      Since it has a 220 outlet, I'd be inclined to connect a transfer switch and just connect it into the house circuit so lights and the fridge work without a maze of extension cords.

    2. Re:Yup... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I can run my gas heater off my portable generator. I can charge phones, run the computers too. It was a lot less than $10K. Unlike yours, mine runs on gasoline. I have a siphon, so I can pull gas from the cars if I run out.

  17. Distributed Power Generation by Phoenix666 · · Score: 2

    The answer to this problem, and also to the problem of grid failure due to extreme weather, is to decentralize power production. Individual homes can often produce as much power as they need with solar and micro-wind turbines. If they tie in to a micro-grid--essentially a neighborhood-level grid--they can load balance against their neighbors.

    Decentralizing power production yields many other benefits, too. Individuals save tons of money on power bills (the cost of solar, for example, has been dropping dramatically), the country produces less CO2, and everyone has a lot more money in their pockets they can boost the economy with.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:Distributed Power Generation by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      I'd agree, but the cost is still a pretty big barrier to entry for most people.

      I'm not just talking about the cost of the power generation equipment itself here, but the big picture. For example, I'm renting a townhouse from a guy right now, and while I'd love to generate some of my own electricity and get off the grid? I'm not even allowed to put anything on his (recently re-shingled) roof. Even running a small backup generator during a power outage is problematic here, thanks to decisions like hard-wiring the electric water heater instead of making it plug into a wall outlet. (Can't just unplug it from the wall and attach to an extension cord going outside to a gas powered generator.)

      When we buy our next home, I'll have more options .... but even then? Unless I'm able to take out a mortgage for more than the home's price to cover it, we won't really have the disposable income to invest in something like solar power. (IMO, the companies selling everything from natural gas powered backup generators to wind turbines to solar panels need to come up with a "no money down" program where monthly payments are no more than the utility bills you replaced with them. Until that's feasible, it's still overpriced for a lot of us.)

    2. Re:Distributed Power Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a hard sell because people that generate their own power are portrayed as loonies in the media.

      If I moved to a rural area, the first thing I would do would be to add turbines and solar panels. Despite what is constantly being said in the media and by right-wing pundits (who have their nose in the oil troff) it makes a lot of economic sense.

    3. Re:Distributed Power Generation by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Generating home power isn't a all or nothing situation. There are levels you can get into that have lower prices for entry.

    4. Re:Distributed Power Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you can' just set up a small wind turbine and load balance against your neighbours. Not even if you all actually succeed in cooperation on your micro-grid. the reason is simple:

      When there is a wind gust, your windmill produce more than you need. You can't send this excess power to your neighbour, because his little windmill is also overproducing from the same excessive wind. And when it is dark and your solar panel doesn't help - your neighbours solar panel is in the dark too.

      You'll have to load balance over long distances, or against other kinds of power sources.

      You can still reduce your electricity bill with a windmill, but unless you can load balance against something remote or different, all you can do is waste any excess power you don't need.

    5. Re:Distributed Power Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm a lowly AC
      But mod-parent up because he is right.
      This thought occurred to both Edison and Tesla.
      Luckily Tesla solved the distribution issue, essentially locking us in.

      We need to use less power, and the power we do sue should be made at home, via whatever technology we have (solaor, wind, heat, fusion, crystals, three sea shells)

    6. Re:Distributed Power Generation by evilviper · · Score: 1

      The answer to this problem, and also to the problem of grid failure due to extreme weather, is to decentralize power production.

      Won't help AT ALL.

      If you've got a solar panel on your roof, you'll always have power, of course... But your neighbors will still be in the dark, even if you have enough power to supply a few of them. Grid-tied systems MUST have safety circuitry which shuts down if the grid is dark... That's mainly so that your inverter doesn't fry some unsuspecting line workers fixing a downed line that SHOULD be off. But even if that wasn't the case, your puny rooftop PV provides so little power that you simply can't fulfill the entire needs, and even in an area packed with PVs, others would be getting incredibly low voltage coming in, and destroying any appliances unlucky enough to be turned on.

      Without a power plant in every neighborhood (which doesn't work well for manyfold reasons) that can provide full peak power needs entirely on it's own, distributed generation will NOT solve this problem.

      I've always suggested making the grid slightly smarter, so that it will respond to voltage drops by automatically cutting off sections of the grid, neighborhood by neighborhood. That would prevent sudden power events from destroying generating stations. It would ensure that power failures would remain localized, and not affect entire time-zones for weeks. And these changes would make it far quicker and easier to recover from failures, as a much lesser amount of power (and therefore, coordination) is needed to restart service.

      But since no power grid will EVER have 100% reliability, most everyone should invest in at least a $100 engine/generator (the key capacity metric is whether it can power your refrigerator). In most areas of the country, it will sit around gathering dust for a few years, then the week you need it, it will suddenly pay for itself several times over. This goes DOUBLE or TRIPLE for businesses that serve large numbers of people, like gas stations, office buildings (see: elevators), cell tower sites, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Distributed Power Generation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize it's also the hard right wing pundits who push for total off grid, take nothing from the state, self sufficient power, "prepper" lifestyles, right?

    8. Re:Distributed Power Generation by virginiajim · · Score: 1

      Community produced power is a national effort by citizens to help address the need to reduce carbon production. One of the examples, the University Park Solar Project in Columbia, Maryland, (http://bit.ly/w8zBA5) is discussed in the last five minutes of the Jan 6, 2012 Marketplace Money episode (http://bit.ly/wSZ5n2). Makes you wonder how much power could be produced if the roof of every church in the United States was covered with solar cells while bumping up the church treasuries and returning a percentage of investment to parishioners who fund the ventures as was done in this example.

  18. Glad I live in Texas by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    A downed transmission line in Ohio or wildfire in California shouldn't affect me.

    http://www.geni.org/globalenergy/library/national_energy_grid/united-states-of-america/graphics/USA_grid.gif

    1. Re:Glad I live in Texas by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 0

      I wish there was a wall between Texas and the rest of the country so Texas wouldn't affect US.

    2. Re:Glad I live in Texas by Overzeetop · · Score: 2

      Nah, it just means that when Texas power goes down, the rest of us don't have to give a shit.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Glad I live in Texas by Megane · · Score: 1

      tl;dr explanation for those who don't like clicking links: There are three main power grids in the US. The west coast (from NM/CO/WY/MN and west), the east coast (most of the rest of the US), and Texas (minus the two panhandles). That means any problems on the two monster power grids won't affect most of Texas. And the much smaller size of the Texas power grid means it's not as likely to have problems amplified by the scale of the whole grid.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Glad I live in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those of us in Texas couldn't care less what happens to the rest of you. So it's mutual.

    5. Re:Glad I live in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Glad I live in Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've often said the same about San Francisco, out here in California.

    7. Re:Glad I live in Texas by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Win - Win!

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  19. Jeff Dagle - He knows what he is talking about by kelv · · Score: 1

    I know Jeff Dagle and he knows what he is talking about. I meet him when visiting PNNL earlier in the year and he understands how the bulk transmission system in the US works better than most people on the planet.

    The best thing the US TSOs have done to prevent this happening again is install lots of PMUs under the NASPI program (see https://www.naspi.org/) which Jeff is a member of. This is what gives the TSOs (and all the regional coordination authorities etc....) the real-time operational awareness of the stability of the bulk transmission system that just didn't exist a decade ago.

  20. Corporations Rule by shawnhcorey · · Score: 1

    By law, corporations in the US must enhance their shareholders value. That means they're cheap. Cheap infrastructures are not robust. They are built to fail. Another blackout that happened in the NE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_blackout_of_1965

    --
    Don't stop where the ink does.
    1. Re:Corporations Rule by Torvac · · Score: 1

      inevitable to fail if the basic infrastructure of municipal living gets privatized to feed banksters. next is ? water, police, hospitals ?

    2. Re:Corporations Rule by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I keep seeing people on Slashdot complain about businesses attempting to obtain value, and how public utilities are shining beacons of honesty and goodness.
      Here you go: http://www.dailynews.com/general-news/20070930/more-than-13-of-dwp-workers-are-paid-100000-and-up

      Just so we're clear on this: There are greedy jerks on both public and private sector payrolls.

  21. Eurotrash by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Many eurotrash countries have a stiff government finger in the HV transmission soup, which means their investments might be based on something other than "cheapest stuff that probably won't cause global meltdown in next quarter". I live in Denmark and have had one 10 minutes power cut in the last 5 years.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

    1. Re:Eurotrash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in São Paulo, Brazil, and I have had one 4 hours power cut in the last 5 years.

      Not bad, yes?

  22. THE SKY IS FALLING!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the crap the Democrats were telling us in 2008???

  23. Much ado about nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the power goes out, they fix it and it comes back on. Even if it's out for a few days society as we know it will not fall apart.

    Light some candles, get a flashlight, forget about the TV and internet - and enjoy the peace and quiet for a bit.

  24. given by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that some states like CA (~12% of the current population) haven't built any new power plants in the last 30 years it's pretty easy to believe.

  25. Break-even calculation by Phoenix666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It does not make sense in your situation as a renter, but when you own it does, even with where installation costs and everything else are now. The average American family uses 940kwh/month.

    Let's take the case of a house in NYC, which has both some of the highest labor costs (pertinent to installation costs of solar panels) and electricity costs ($0.35/kwh from ConEdison). You need 26 290W panels to produce the electricity you need. The cost of panels plus installation totals $48.5K. After just the federal incentive it comes down to $32K. The ConEdison-provided electricity costs $4K/yr, so that's a break-even time of 8 years. Most people own their homes longer than 8 years.

    When you factor in the New York State solar incentive of 25% the break-even drops to 5 years. When you consider that ConEdison's price per kwh has increased more than 10% every year for the past 10 years, that break-even time drops to 4-4.5 years.

    If the upfront cost of $22K is still a barrier when you buy that house, you can shop around for energy efficient mortgages. They lend to you at an advantageous rate so you can afford to upgrade the home's energy efficiency, as in they knock of a couple basis points. The savings over a 30-yr mortgage are huge, on top of what you save on the electricity (most solar panels are rated for that long).

    In short, it already makes financial sense to do this stuff, and since the cost of going solar dropped 80% between 2008-2012 it's only going to get easier.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  26. pomposity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "simple geography dictates that it is always just a few transmission lines from collapse, according to a mathematical study of spatial networks."

    Oh, really, it takes a mathematical analysis ?
    Probably coulda gone down to the local tavern on Friday, asked a couple of the guys, what happens we loose two or more main transmission lines...

    The Buddha came to a village by a large lake,and was told that the local sage was such a rishi that he could walk across the lake to the next village.
    The buddha said, for a penny I can take a ferry.
    Moral of the story: don't use a 5axis CNC milling machine when a rasp will do

  27. Funny how no one thought that any of the money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Used to pay my electrical bill need to be used to upkeep the grid and 100 percent of it could go to stock holders and now you made your money but want me to pay for it with my taxes. well no your the one making money off it. issue bonds what ever you have to do or if I pay for it then dont charge me for my electricity.
    You cant have it both ways.

  28. like software I have worked on by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Just a few more classes or methiods away from utter chaos, unless its refactored.

    1. Re:like software I have worked on by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2

      Meh, any library is one character away from total failure.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  29. Deregulation at work by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Informative

    We decided that regulating how much maintenance work utility companies have to do on their lines stifled innovation, so we deregulated. Naturally, said companies cut back on maintenance to save money. This was covered pretty well in The Best Democracy Money Can Buy by Greg Palast, flawed as he may be in terms of his self-importance.

    Democracy Now discussion from 10 years ago.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  30. Doesn't matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll all have 3D printers and we just need to print out fully charged batteries, right? Then we can colonize Mars and get off this mud ball!

  31. california outages in 2001 (?) underscore this by swschrad · · Score: 2

    particularly when a forest fire burned one of the transmission lines, and another got so hot it sagged and shorted out. we had 24 hours of battery backup in the DA Hotel in San Jose, and when the Liebert went down, so did our service for 3 or 4 days. rotating blackouts for several weeks.

    take any two lines down into any city, and you'll have the same thing anyplace. any two. even a piddly little 40 KV feeder.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  32. Free beer by holophrastic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I lived in Toronto at the time. We were without power for about 24 hours. We all banded together in a crisis situation to drink the beer while it was still cold.

    Local bars and pubs were giving it away free. And it was patio-season too!

    And I got to mock all of my friends whose cars were useless only because they didn't know how to manually open their garage doors. Funny.

    I'm looking forward to the next power failure.

  33. Irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is, if grid electricity is $X per kWh in some place, and $Y per kWh in another place, and the price of solar power is something that's greater than X but less than Y, then solar power makes sense in the second place but does not make sense in the first.

    How much power you use in either place is entirely irrelevant. If it's more expensive, it's more expensive no matter how much or how little of it you buy.

    CAPTCHA: "coulomb", of all things

  34. for less than 10 grand by phorm · · Score: 1

    for less than 10 grand

    Well then, I'll just head on down to WalMart and drop the extra $8k I have sitting around on a generator...

    Oh wait.. anyone want to lend me 8K?

  35. Re:The US is just a pro-gay version of Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you happen to live in the USA....go away, you unappreciative homosexual.

  36. Correct observation, EU sucks more by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Well, I've observed the problem at multiple locations in the US and none in the EU.

    Older buildings in general have shoddy wiring. Pretty obviously the EU has a lot of older buildings than the U.S...

    Modern buildings in the U.S. have wiring that is just fine thanks.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Correct observation, EU sucks more by toddestan · · Score: 1

      In the US things generally get grandfathered in, so that's why we have buildings that are still wired to standards from almost a century ago. In the EU they generally frown on that kind of stuff.

  37. Load Balancing by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    A gust of wind does not produce equal power even within the same neighborhood. And energy usage among households is not uniform even at time t1. What if I'm not home, not using the electricity generated from my wind turbine, but you are? What if we both have battery packs to store unused power generated, that smooth out availability between changes in windspeed? What if we store excess power as hydrogen that gets run back through a fuel cell when we need more power? Or, what if we sell back excess to the larger grid and have them cut us a check? You see, load balancing in a micro grid gives you all that flexibility and resilience.

    These are all things that exist now, that people do. It's simply not widespread yet. But it will be.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  38. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The answer to this problem, and also to the problem of grid failure due to extreme weather, is to decentralize power production. Individual homes can often produce as much power as they need with solar and micro-wind turbines. If they tie in to a micro-grid [rmi.org]--essentially a neighborhood-level grid--they can load balance against their neighbors."

    And on cloudy days with little wind, you'll make up your energy shortfall from the neighbors? Just how big is this neighborhood?

    What's that? Use grid power on those days? That's not "decentralized".

  39. in other words by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    We need more police to watch the transmission lines to keep us safe from terrorists.

  40. Re:Wrong analogy - That'll Put a Crimp in My Tesla by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    No, it needs to involve cars. All analogies, especially those pertaining to something technical, must always be reduced to cars.

    You're right, you're right... my mistake!

    "Facebook could probably lose a few gas stations and remain a perfectly stable network..."

           

           

    Ahh. Then it's not Facebook that faces disaster - it's my commute.

    I just bought a Tesla Model S!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  41. Not such a bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Alaska our "grid" is isolated. Perhaps not such a bad thing after all. There is one intertie between Fairbanks and Anchorage. Fairbanks has a UPS large enough to run the city for about 15 minutes if the interie fails or some generation falls off, this gives them enough time to ramp up some local generation. Juneau is on it's own.

  42. Insolation, Wind Maps by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    That's why it's important to use wind maps (average wind speed where you are) and insolation (average number of daily hours of maximum solar production where you are) to determine if you should do wind/solar and how much. Energy storage (batteries, hydrogen, gravity, etc) help with temporal buffering and smoothing, as in, my solar array produced more than I needed yesterday but not as much as I need today. Micro-grids provide lateral buffering, as in, a tree branch took out my neighbor's wind turbine but he can still function because I and the neighbors are still producing.

    Of course it's also worth pointing out that even on cloudy days solar panels still produce electricity, just not as much as on full sunny days. It's also worth pointing out that the house up the bend and slightly lower than me can have a different local wind speed; and if you live anywhere near an ocean or large body of water, there is almost never *no* wind.

    So if ConEdison were to struggle to supply Jackson Heights and the swathes of Queens that always experience brownouts every summer and those areas were to have micro-grids in place, then they could continue to function no matter the problems ConEdison might have. That is the definition and benefit of "decentralization."

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  43. In Soviet Russia by Roachie · · Score: 1

    YOU are on edge of failure!!

    --
    This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
  44. Not the same. Greed is a red herring. by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    I couldn't let this go without a response. Greedy jerks are all over the place; however, the vehicles differ greatly. Monopolies have zero competition benefit.
    FAITH in the superiority of "free enterprise" is a religion and your true god is Mammon.

    Private interests use their ill gotten gains to corrupt and undermine democracy! Those corrupt officials who take an extra $100k are small fry who can't defend themselves anything like the CEOs and shareholders stealing millions do. The bigger the crime the LESS accountability. Don't rob banks, run them.

  45. What is the US government doing?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already they should be making plans to invade a country with the most electricity in it, and conjuring propaganda to back it all up! The electricity supply lines are at stake here!

  46. Classic by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    Basically this is about the failover systems not having sufficient resources to handle their normal job plus the extra stuff failing over to them.

    We've had that same issue at the hosting company where I worked 10 years ago. They had a regular power feed and a backup UPS-backed feed, plus an ATS system to automatically fail over the regular feed to the UPS feed when needed. The UPS-feed was regular power, plus batteries and a generator. The idea was that servers with multiple PDUs should be connected to both feeds and everything else to the regular feed. Now, both feeds had the same capacity ratings and the regular feed was close to maximum capacity. This shouldn't be an issue as the dual PDU servers were fairly few.

    Now the regular power dies.

    The UPS-backed feed now powers everything, including both PDUs in multiple PDU servers, bot the switch isn't completely instantaneous which causes a few servers (5%) to crash and reboot, causing more load still. Now we're quite a bit over capacity and the UPS feeds goes down too. Instant silence. No cooling, no fans, no hum. Just silence.

    Lesson learned: Make sure you have enough capacity on your backup systems to handle both the combined needs and a generous margin to ensure that spikes relating to the switchover can be handled as well. Too many high tension systems have limited failover capacity so if more than one thing fails, overload is guaranteed and a cascade failure unavoidable.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  47. The difference is mostly semantics by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    The differences remain mostly semantics. Over here 'Residual Current Devices' are called 'Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter', or GFCI. If the device detects any imbalance of current between L-N or voltage on ground it trips. US standards for the leakage voltage is so small though that we only mandate it's usage on 'likely' circuits- outside, bathroom, and kitchen. Another option we have is Arc-fault devices, which attempt to cut off if arc-like loads are detected.

    US doesn't usually have ring circuits in domestic situations, hence you guys rate cables at pretty much the maximum current they can handle without actually catching fire

    We normally NEVER have ring circuits domestically. The ratings are NOT just 'without actually catching fire', they're also rated for acceptable voltage drop. There's also actually 3 standards - 60/75/90C - IE 12 gauge with 60C insulation shouldn't ever get over 60C even at maximum load, run length, and environmental temperature, with minimum heat dissipation and no more than a 5% voltage drop.

    If you have above average length runs, there's formulas in the NEC that will tell you if you need to shift to larger cables.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right