Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin, BYOD, Phablet, Selfie, and Twerking Find Place In Oxford Dictionary

hypnosec writes "The Oxford Dictionaries Online (ODO) has been updated today to include some of the widely used tech words like Bitcoin, BYOD, Phablet, Selfie, and Twerking among others. Some of the other common tech words which have found a place in the dictionary are 'click and connect', 'digital detox', 'FOMO', 'geek chic', 'hackerspace', 'Internet of Things', 'MOOC', 'selfie', and 'TL;DR'."

131 comments

  1. Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No idea.

    1. Re:Twerking? by jaymzter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell me about it, I feel like Abe Simpson:

      "I used to be `with it.' But then they changed what `it' was. Now what I'm `with' isn't `it' and what's `it' seems weird and scary to me. It'll happen to you."

      --
      If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
    2. Re:Twerking? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      CNN taught me that it's when a woman bounces her ass up and down.

      Wiki also notes, with a citation "Twerking carries both gendered and racialized connotations." Which seems about as idiotic to me as saying round corners are something associated exclusively with iphones.

    3. Re: Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you tried looking it up in a dictionary?

    4. Re:Twerking? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Connotations are implications that are often true, not always true. And that's definitely the case for "twerking", as you can verify on any sex-positive youtube clone. Heck, even on daily motion it's obvious, with only Miley Cyrus and some k-pop dance group as exceptions on the first page of results.

      WTF is a Phablet? anyone?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Twerking? by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please stop talking about Miley Cyrus. That performance was one of the worst things I've ever seen. Not because she decided to try to shock people - Madonna and Gaga have both done that excellently over the years - but because she failed so badly at being actually sexy. Creepy tongue, vag itch impression, ugh. The only decent thing that's come out of it is this.

    6. Re: Twerking? by bughunter · · Score: 0

      I suggest referring to PornHub instead.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    7. Re:Twerking? by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      It's what the American society wants. Miley Cyrus is putting on a show to deliver. She's reacting to the market, not creating one. She also stands to make huge ultra mega bucks from all this activity!

      America = morally bankrupt.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    8. Re:Twerking? by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Too big to be a phone, too small to be a tablet.

    9. Re:Twerking? by gman003 · · Score: 2

      Phablet = Phone + Tablet. It's the term being used by marketers who realize that 5+ inch displays can't really be pure phones, but still want to sell them.

      Examples: Galaxy Note, Asus FonePad, etc.

    10. Re:Twerking? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the uncanny valley of portable devices! No wonder I hadn't heard of it.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tell me about it, I feel like Abe Simpson:

      "I used to be `with it.' But then they changed what `it' was. Now what I'm `with' isn't `it' and what's `it' seems weird and scary to me. It'll happen to you."

      The mistake is in caring about keeping up with trends or slang or "what's cool" in the first place.

      Write your own life story, and quit worrying about what other people say or think. You'll be surprised
      how much happiness is linked with this approach.

    12. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      It's what the American society wants. Miley Cyrus is putting on a show to deliver. She's reacting to the market, not creating one. She also stands to make huge ultra mega bucks from all this activity!

      No. She *thinks* she is reacting to the market. In fact she failed oh so badly. She delivered the entertainment industry's version of Steve Balmer's Developers Developers Developers dance.

    13. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wiki also notes, with a citation "Twerking carries both gendered and racialized connotations." Which seems about as idiotic to me as saying round corners are something associated exclusively with iphones.

      If it's not a fat-assed black woman, it's not twerking.

    14. Re:Twerking? by EETech1 · · Score: 1

      Twerking...

      Sounds like hammering in your own nail, and telling the world how great it feels in 140 characters or less.

    15. Re:Twerking? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And yet the American public laps up this dog vomit like fine wine. Again, it's what the market wants. Right? Right??!!

      Fuck! Whatever happened to decent educational programming and real news. I mean real quality content! But whatever; conservatives such as myself are old and obsolete. I should just go away. The people have spoken and they want more dog vomit!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    16. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is going to be trolling but I happen to agree with you..

      I thought she never had any talent, and by that pathetic attempt to "shock" the shit for brains press/media, it only reenforces that thought. Like the talentless others you mention Madonna and Gaga. Not that I need to say this to you, but the only reason they are even popular is because of there sad sense of "fashion" Madonna in the 80's, and Gaga outrageous stage costumes, none of them are "good" (notice the terrible "good" grade, and not "great") looking. But this is how the downfall of music has continued through out the years, just throw someone who looks remotely good looking and promote then to adolescent teenage crowds and bingo, easy money..

    17. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet the American public laps up this dog vomit like fine wine.

      All we know so far is that the MTV producers liked the act. And did they like it because they thought it was good or because she would make a total fool of herself and people would talk about it? Either works for MTV.

      We have to wait for sales figures for Miley's next album to see if she still has any credibility left.

    18. Re:Twerking? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      The mistake is in caring about keeping up with trends or slang or "what's cool" in the first place.

      Write your own life story, and quit worrying about what other people say or think. You'll be surprised
      how much happiness is linked with this approach.

      Thanks, I think I needed that this morning.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    19. Re:Twerking? by d0s · · Score: 2

      The "educational programming and real news" is on PBS and NPR. Old and obsolete conservatives have been trying to destroy these dangerous harbingers of socialism nearly since their inception. The "dog vomit" is what you get when you let the market decide what programming to broadcast. Keep voting for those guys and one day there won't be any educational programming at all!

    20. Re:Twerking? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I'm truly sorry to be the one to teach you this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgoyVRO0A0E

      Anyway, "twerking" is more or less putting your hands on your knees, squatting down, and jerking/bouncing/wobbling your hips and ass back and forth, so it looks like you're fucking someone who is on all-fours on the ground in the ass. It looks stupid, but has been around for awhile, I guess.

      Anyway, this "we're adding new stupid shit to the dictionary!' thing isn't worth paying attention to. It's just a regularly scheduled self-promotion attempt. The stupider the thing they say they're "putting in the dictionary", the more publicity and attention they get for it.

      Plus, the dictionary says that "literally" actually means "figuratively", so fuck dictionaries in their fucking face.

    21. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't that she WAS too sexy. The problem was she WASN'T.

      Sex for shock value is one thing. Gets the conservatives up in arms. But Miley has everyone up in arms because she failed so badly at it that even the sexual degenerates are upset with her too.

    22. Re:Twerking? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I've only heard about the incident through some friends' posts on fecebook[sic]. Every one of them said it was disgusting and that she is out of favor, so I'm not sure who you're listening to that said it was a wonderful performance, but I don't think being American would have anything to do with it.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    23. Re:Twerking? by cheater512 · · Score: 2

      Morals don't come in to it at all. It was just flat out a ridiculous performance.

    24. Re:Twerking? by lgw · · Score: 1

      PBS is mostly reality TV now where I am. NPR news is mostly propaganda, which is sad because there's some other good programming there still. Or at least it seems like propaganda to me - maybe I'm just unduly suspicions of news paid for by the government?

      Both of the public radio stations I listen to get no government subsidy beyond the space for their studios in the school/college each is associated with. One's kids' dance music, the other is old people's jazz. Both get their funding from listeners. It's a good model, and one that makes it OK that you play what the money wants you to play, since it will always tend that way.

      Sadly, our experiment with cable educational(ish) channels seems to have failed, now we have the Nazi Channel and the Ghost channel, will little room left for history or science. Lest you think a hands-off public funding model works better, educational programming has largely vanished from the BBC as well, at least compared to 40-50 years ago.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    25. Re:Twerking? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      That could sort of apply to Miley as well.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    26. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the dictionary says that "literally" actually means "figuratively", so fuck dictionaries in their fucking face.

      Literally, figuratively or both?

    27. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oumm you sure it isnt when in that funny variation of football Americans play they all shout set and present their backsides?

    28. Re:Twerking? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nor did I until a few weeks ago.

      Friend: "So, Lucy starts Twerking and..."
      Me: "Wait, twerking?"
      Friend: "Yeah. You know what twerking is?"
      Me: "Uh... is it like a queef?"

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    29. Re:Twerking? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      All we know so far is that the MTV producers liked the act.

      They say they liked it.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    30. Re:Twerking? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Lest you think a hands-off public funding model works better, educational programming has largely vanished from the BBC as well, at least compared to 40-50 years ago.

      Garbage. There are two whole channels of it. 50 years ago there weren't two channels in total, and they only transmitted for half the day..

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    31. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twerking hard or hardly twerking?

    32. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you underrate PBS/NPR/PRI/etc. They still produce good programming, though the programming is often independent from those orgs... eg. Frontline. The funding mix they get is hardly dependent on the gov, rather "viewers like you" pay as you mention. Many PBS affiliates also pump out something like 4-5 channels now that they're all digital broadcasting.

      WGBH

      You can watch online:

      Frontline
      PBS Newshour
      NOVA
      History Detectives
      Nature

      etc.

    33. Re:Twerking? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Creepy tongue, Marilyn Manson
      Vag itch impression, Madonna
      Bizarre and stupid background stuff like pedobears: Gaga
      Sexual content: everyone

      I saw this performance as a parody of everything going on today in popular music. The question is, who actually envisioned it and designed the performance? That could tell us if it was a brilliant work of parody or a hilarious work of insanity.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    34. Re:Twerking? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      She failed to deliver.

    35. Re:Twerking? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The delivery sucked, that's the problem.

    36. Re:Twerking? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The delivery sucked, that's the problem.

      Sorry, I forgot "lame performance, shitty music: everyone"

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    37. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the failing to be sexy. While I found the low-depths to which she was willing to sink disgusting and degrading to herself and the public, it actually turned me on :)

    38. Re:Twerking? by skids · · Score: 1

      I think its entirely appropriate that the dictionary keep track of "widely used tech terms" like... uh... twerking? Goddamn I must be in the wrong field of tech!

    39. Re:Twerking? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > That performance .... I've ever seen

      I think I have identified your problem. Until people started talking about this Miley person and her twerking, I had no idea MTV even still existed.

      All in all, I feel pretty bi-winning with tiger blood about that.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    40. Re:Twerking? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      They get like 7% of their funding from the government.

      Don't get me wrong, they are a mouthpiece of the regieme. They still interview people from the ONDCP even after the GAO report stating that it wasn't worth evaluating their statements since the ONDCP charter requires them to lie.

      They still lap up the official story like the government has never lied to them....every single time....

      but all that aside, they get my monthly contribution because for all their faults and regieme loving, they are the closest thing to reasonable mainstream news out there.

      RT is pretty good if you are willing to go international and get it from a Russian mouthpiece.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    41. Re: Twerking? by vesuvana · · Score: 1

      This morning the radio played Morgan Freeman reading aloud the new dictionary definition of twerking. I recommend googling it- worthwhile!

    42. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what I think? I think the Oxford people are doing EXACTLY what Miley is doing. Trying to act cool and do all sorts of questionable stuff just to get attention.

      Candidates for next year's edition: fap, A2M, derp, facial (I know it's there, but the definition is incomplete *cough*).

      Oh, and why not replace the cover with "TL;DR - Press F7"?

    43. Re:Twerking? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      The people have spoken and they want more dog vomit!

      My dog resembles that remark!

      And he doesn't think much of Miley Cyrus' bum, either.

    44. Re:Twerking? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      As a matter of interest: my mother completed an Open University degree course, involving lectures on BBC2(?) in (late '70s?) early '80s. Are those still happening?

    45. Re:Twerking? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      But this is how the downfall of music has continued through out the years...

      There is still plenty of good music happening. You just won't hear it from these moronic bimbos.

    46. Re:Twerking? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Excrement! I never heard of queef before. However, I don't think I'll mention it to my wife. A bit of a showstopper, that...

    47. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could have sworn this was a nerd site. I guess I was mistaken.

    48. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet the American public laps up this dog vomit like fine wine. Again, it's what the market wants. Right? Right??!!

      Have you actually considered listening to the market's reaction on it? Essentially, she just torpedoed her career. It was like a John Waters film -- raunchy without a hint of sex appeal. No, Americans don't want that.

      A better analogy would be that Americans would rather than Bud Lite than fine wine. Unfortunately, Miley Cyrus publicly urinated into a bottle and claimed it was beer. No doubt there are some who would drink it anyway either because they really can't tell the difference or claim not to for "ironic" purposes or are just the nasty kind of people who are into that sort of thing, but the vast majority of even the most unsophisticated parts of the market are recoiling with revulsion right now.

    49. Re:Twerking? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      NPR is stilm the best place to get news. PAy attention to how they interview people in pokitics, and pay attention to the stories compared to other news site.

      oh, and here is a piece of history: For decades the government gave broadcaster money to have a news program.
      It was that era of that great journalism came from, good insights, investigative journalism. The least biased, most factual and best delivered news came from an era of the government paying for it.

      When the government stopped and let the market run it is when it all fell to shit.

      As a tax payer, I would like the government to giver broadcaster money to have a news program. One without commercials, that has no other revenue stream.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    50. Re:Twerking? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      unless you get happiness from money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    51. Re:Twerking? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Fuck! Whatever happened to decent educational programming and real news. I mean real quality content! But whatever; conservatives such as myself are old and obsolete. I should just go away.

      Conservatives killed it by getting rid of the fairness doctrine and fueling the growth of entertainment-focused news organizations via talk radio and cable news. Programs that cater to the information-seeking crowd are usually panned as "liberal" and "biased."

      Okay, maybe that's a smidge unfair, because the partisan divide is a bit less important than the educational interest divide in the country. (Though one might argue that killing news with a neutral POV policy may have contributed to that shift.)

      Conservatives tend to love competitive reality television. Liberals tend to love observational reality television. But both love reality TV, because both sides are filled with idiots. "Low information voters" are actually the majority; we just focused in the last election on the ones who didn't have strong enough opinions to hide their lack of care about getting informed on issues of substance.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    52. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write your own life story, and quit worrying about what other people say or think.

      Exactly! Now you're twerking.

    53. Re:Twerking? by lgw · · Score: 1

      It was that era of that great journalism came from, good insights, investigative journalism. The least biased, most factual and best delivered news came from an era of the government paying for it.

      Ahh, nostalgia for the good old days, always a reliable soruce of facts. Crocknight's lies about the progress of the Vietnam war lost us that war - feel free to idolize him, but do so realistically.

       

      As a tax payer, I would like the government to giver broadcaster money to have a news program

      Geekoid, I know your posts, you'd like the government to give infinite money to infinite causes, and you'd still rail on evil greedy conservatives for setting the debt ceiling at Aleph-Null, when Krugman insists Aleph-One is practical.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    54. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more interested in the etymology than the definition. Where/how did the word originate?

    55. Re:Twerking? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Crocknight's lies about the progress of the Vietnam war lost us that war

      Really? I could have sworn it was because we weren't willing to nuke the whole god damned country. Many South Vietnamese supported the NLF. Even if we had 'won', it would have been an empty victory because it was contrary to the wishes of the people.

    56. Re:Twerking? by lgw · · Score: 1

      We won every battle. We lost the war, per Clausewitz, because the enemy (Cronkite) destroyed our moral strength, so we surrendered despite tactical victory.

      I agree it would likely have been an empty victory, but you can say the some for Communism in Vietnam. Before 1986 everyone there would agree the nation was communist (especially if they might be overheard), but more of the means of production were in the hands of private citizens than the government, and the spirit of entrepreneurism was alive and well. Post 1986 I guess it's officially Socialist.
       

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    57. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, the dictionary says that "literally" actually means "figuratively", so fuck dictionaries in their fucking face.

      Bullshit. Google:

      literally /litrl,litr-/
      adverb
      adverb: literally1. in a literal manner or sense; exactly.
      "the driver took it literally when asked to go straight across the traffic circle"
      synonyms: exactly, precisely, actually, really, truly; More

      perhaps you're talking about Websters.

      Usage Discussion of LITERALLY
      Since some people take sense 2 to be the opposite of sense 1, it has been frequently criticized as a misuse. Instead, the use is pure hyperbole intended to gain emphasis, but it often appears in contexts where no additional emphasis is necessary.
      Examples of LITERALLY
      Many words can be used both literally and figuratively.
      He took her comments literally.
      He's a sailor who knows his ropes, literally and figuratively.
      The term “Mardi Gras” literally means “Fat Tuesday” in French.
      The story he told was basically true, even if it wasn't literally true.
        make the whole scene literally glow with the fires of his imagination. —Alfred Kazin, Harper's, December 1968
      Even Muff did not miss our periods of companionship, because about that time she grew up and started having literally millions of kittens. —Jean Stafford, Bad Characters, 1954
      Lily, the caretaker's daughter, was literally run off her feet. Hardly had she brought one gentleman into the little pantry than the wheezy hall-door bell clanged again and she had to scamper along the bare hallway to let in another guest. —James Joyce, Dubliners, 1914
        yet the wretch, absorbed in his victuals, and naturally of an unutterable dullness, did not make a single remark during dinner, whereas I literally blazed with wit. —William Makepeace Thackeray, Punch, 30 Oct. 1847
      Origin of LITERALLY
      (see 1literal)
      First Known Use: 1533

    58. Re:Twerking? by kermidge · · Score: 1

      @Hognoxious

      In 1963 almost any city with 25,000 people had at least one television station. (I just spent an hour looking via my weak search fu, couldn't find figures, so I'm going by my recollection living in the East, West, and Midwest during the Sixties.)

      So that makes hundreds of stations. Generally, local stations started early in the morning, 6 to 7am. There'd be a sign-on, sometimes a short homily by a local pastor, then on to a local farm and weather report. Many would carry network feeds for shows such as The Today Show.

      Most would sign off around 10pm. In larger markets there'd be the Jack Paar show followed by old movies until the wee hours.

      If you're just speaking of public educational TV, that's something else entirely, and I don't recall any until getting cable in early 70's.

      @geekoid

      I didn't know the government gave TV stations money. What I do know is that for a long time each broadcast station - radio and TV - had to set aside a certain amount of time per day (or as a percentage of their broadcast day, I fergit) for programming in the public interest. This usually was taken to mean news. Later, TV in particular turned their news departments into "profit centers".

      Yup, I remember Edward Murrow, Eric Sevareid, Walter Cronkite, Huntley and Brinckly. And the serious drama shows such as Playhouse 90. It wasn't quite yet the wasteland characterized and predicted by Newton Minow, but we could see it heading that way.

    59. Re:Twerking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom is morally bankrupt, asshat.

    60. Re:Twerking? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Have you actually considered directly responding to the people who responded to you in separate messages so that they would actually see your response in their own comments page?

      Just a tip for the future. Breaking the flow in a forum-type discussion like that is considered a bit boorish.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  2. But... by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 0

    Does the ODO include "First Post" or FP?

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but I doubt that it includes "second post." Better luck next time...

    2. Re:But... by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      This entry proves conclusively that you will probably enjoy the Wikimedia Project's efforts in this area more.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  3. Mutability by cosm · · Score: 1

    The English language (and many other oral languages) have a high level of mutability. The OED was originally started as a compendium of the set of all usages encountered in writing for various forms to expressly include previously 'unregistered' words (re:librarians - my layman's oversimplification) and their grammar with a focus on including historically unregistered words that hadn't made it into the cannon.

    That aside, I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

    Lastly, if any of you have ever used the word Phablet in conversational English, we need to have a serious discussion between you and my 12 gauge.

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Mutability by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That aside, I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

      Why? As long as it's properly marked as slang (and I can't imagine it would be called anything else), it serves it purpose of letting people who aren't familiar with the word know what it means. I can't count the number of times I have found some obscure bit of slang in an old book, and been overjoyed to find out that it's documented in my dictionary. In ten, or twenty, or fifty years, when the term "twerking" has basically died the death it deserves, someone reading a work published in 2013 may be equally overjoyed to find his or her dictionary explains the word. That's what dictionaries are for.

    2. Re:Mutability by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Words like 'Phablet' are what turn good, decent, empiricists into linguistic prescriptivists, not that I can blame them under the circumstances (though a bit of mockery is always in order).

    3. Re:Mutability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That aside, I don't want to live on this planet anymore. ....
      Lastly, if any of you have ever used the word Phablet in conversational English, we need to have a serious discussion between you and my 12 gauge.

      Sounds like _you_ need to have a conversation with your 12 gauge then. Just make sure
      you don't slip when you pull the trigger, I knew an EMT who worked in Vegas who
      saw the aftermath of such a mistake, and he says the nightmares still haven't quit.

    4. Re:Mutability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if any of you have ever used the word Phablet in conversational English, we need to have a serious discussion between you and my 12 gauge ...

      Does a conversion as an Android developer regarding screen layout and the size of art assets count? Should I be concerned?

    5. Re:Mutability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phablet : n disappointment.

    6. Re:Mutability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That aside, I don't want to live on this planet anymore. .... Lastly, if any of you have ever used the word Phablet in conversational English, we need to have a serious discussion between you and my 12 gauge.

      Sounds like _you_ need to have a conversation with your 12 gauge then. Just make sure you don't slip when you pull the trigger, I knew an EMT who worked in Vegas who saw the aftermath of such a mistake, and he says the nightmares still haven't quit.

      Maybe he's not cut out for EMT work.

      Pussy.

    7. Re:Mutability by ultranova · · Score: 1

      That aside, I don't want to live on this planet anymore.

      Lastly, if any of you have ever used the word Phablet in conversational English, we need to have a serious discussion between you and my 12 gauge.

      Badass or just a really bad shot, that is the question.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Mutability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the record, these words are not being entered into the OED, just the ODO. It is a crucial difference: http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2013/08/28/_twerk_and_selfie_added_to_oxford_english_dictionary_nope_and_stop_saying.html

    9. Re:Mutability by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like _you_ need to have a conversation with your 12 gauge then.

      If he wants to blow his brains out, he'll need to be a good shot.

    10. Re:Mutability by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Neither, over angry person whose train thought can't get past 'If I don't like it, kill them'.
      The poster is a real Herp-Derp.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. If they really want to get up to date by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 1

    They should add

    Twerk'); DROP TABLE Verbs; --

  5. Re:Tworking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, the context of the Miley thing makes most people think it's a synonym for grinding. It's not. It's a bastardization of "footworking," and it apparently means "to make the ass shake in a provocative manner".

    IMHO "twerk" doesn't sound like an English word. I think it should have been "tworking", which could be pronounced like "torquing", so I'm going to make it my mission to always refer to it as "tworking". I also think that people who do it should be called "tworks" (also pronounced like "torques").

    tl;dr: Miley is a twork for tworking her ass on TV; she did it because she wanted publicity; 'tworked.

  6. 'click and connect' is three words by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

    A phrase doesn't deserve its own entry. Imagine if you tried to include every PHRASE in English. You go from on the order of 170,000 words to practically damn uncountable. It's a mistake to even start down that road.

    1. Re:'click and connect' is three words by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 1

      A phrase doesn't deserve its own entry

      So you would exclude "fait accompli" and "juste milieu" from the dictionary?

      You go from on the order of 170,000 words to practically damn uncountable

      Wikipedia says that the OED has about 750,000 entries.

    2. Re:'click and connect' is three words by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      So you would exclude "fait accompli" and "juste milieu" from the dictionary?

      Yes I would.

      Even the OED defines dictionary as dealing with words and not phrases.

      a book or electronic resource that lists the words of a language (typically in alphabetical order) and gives their meaning, or gives the equivalent words in a different language, often also providing information about pronunciation, origin, and usage:

      I see no mention of phrase in that definition.

    3. Re:'click and connect' is three words by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 1

      That's not the OED definition. This is the OED definition:

      1. a. A book which explains or translates, usually in alphabetical order, the words of a language or languages (or of a particular category of vocabulary) ...

      "Particular category of vocabulary" is understood to include phrases.

    4. Re:'click and connect' is three words by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Sorry I mis-referenced. I meant the Oxford Online Dictionary (OOD) which is the subject of the article.

      "Particular category of vocabulary" is understood to include phrases.

      Citation please. To me, ""[p]articular category of vocabulary" means a specific area such as a dictionary of engineering terms.

      From your citation;

      What time was spent in turning over Dictionaries and Phraseologies to assure the author of doubtful constructions.

      It seems that words go in dictionaries and phrases go in phrasiologies.

    5. Re:'click and connect' is three words by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      But the meaning of "Click and connect" as a phrase is different from the meaning as individual words. The indivdual words could refer to a set of actions. The phrase rarely means a very specific subset.

    6. Re:'click and connect' is three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Particular category of vocabulary" is understood to include phrases.

      By idiots, perhaps.

    7. Re:'click and connect' is three words by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Phrase in common usage have always been part of dictionaries. The fact there are a lot of them is irrelevant.

      IN short, your opinion is in no way rooted in facts or with actual data, thus it's wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:'click and connect' is three words by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Which is about 580000 too many, IMO. Of course, they can do whatever they want. It's not like anybody's going to read their book.

    9. Re:'click and connect' is three words by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      My opinion is a value judgment and value judgments are, by definition, correct insofar as they accurately reflect one's thoughts, but neither mine nore the authors of the OED are universally applicable.

      Except for yours, of course. You appear to be able to judge the rightness of everybody's values.

    10. Re:'click and connect' is three words by GODISNOWHERE · · Score: 1

      Of course, they can do whatever they want. It's not like anybody's going to read their book.

      The OED is widely considered to the finest and most authoritative dictionary of the English language. Every serious English language scholar has access to and consults the OED.

  7. Re:Tworking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone mod this mutherfucker up!

  8. enough already with official buzz word by recharged95 · · Score: 1

    Enough with Twerking.

    Adding it to the dictionary has been reported on the mainstream news joints, like every 15 minutes all day today. It's been used enough today in the news to warrant the word to be lost for the next 5 years... only to be revived by a question in jeopardy. Thanks mainstream [advertising] media! Now I am late for my 9am home room class (right).

    I guess dictionaries have gone social to be relevant. Cause I thought words get added when there's long term meaningfulness. I doubt Twerking is one of them considering technology dies out, i.e. becomes obsolete, for better tech and adding words based on stuff that will be obsolete is just plain illogical.

    Otherwise, gosh, we live in a 'look at me!' world nowadays (I'm looking at you Oxford folks).

    1. Re:enough already with official buzz word by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      I thought words get added when there's long term meaningfulness.

      The primary criterion is being widespread. Long-term is a secondary factor, though often an important one. The OOD happens to be a resource which gives less weight to long-term meaningfulness than, say, the OED. But documenting widespread-but-not-long-term (flash-in-the-pan) terms is a useful function, since documents written today may still exist years in the future.

      Honestly, as a fan of 1940s mystery novels, I'm glad to see slang-of-an-era get documented. Even if that era is now, the documentation will continue to be useful.

      I do, however, agree that this particular event has gotten way more press coverage than it needs or deserves. It's the OOD doing what they have done for many years.

  9. And the OED finds a place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The OED has officially found a place in my TRASH CAN.

    1. Re: And the OED finds a place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we finally know why David Foster Wallace committed suicide.

    2. Re:And the OED finds a place... by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Since this appeared in the OOD, you threw away the wrong book. (The OED is unlikely to add it unless it persists for at least a couple more decades.)

    3. Re:And the OED finds a place... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. Now I have to clean all the Banana peels and coconut husks off my OED.

      Sorry, I thought that the Oxford Dictionary, which is what's referred to in the story's headline, which obviously concerns itself with the English language, and the Oxford English Dictionary were the same thing. I'm going to chock this up to the similarity of names, and the fact that, truth be told, I don't use or have any Oxford product, not even in my shoe closet.

      Yeah, so sorry 'bout that. I may have overreacted.

  10. End by OptimalCynic · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is the end of Western civilisation as we know it.

    1. Re:End by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      I think that was changing the acceptable meaning of "literally" to include that which is not. I have enough of a problem with _accepting_ ignorance much less _encouraging_ it.

    2. Re:End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is the end of Western civilisation as we know it.

      Everyone who reaches middle age has had thoughts such as yours.

      What is actually ending is not "civilisation" but your capacity to deal
      with stupid behavior, which tends to dwindle as one grows older.
      But there IS good news : just quit caring about stupid stuff that doesn't
      directly affect your own life, and it won't bother you any more.
      Trust me, this is a strategy which works.

      .

    3. Re:End by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      I think that was changing the acceptable meaning of "literally" to include that which is not.

      You're kid--no, you're not. So "literally" has been redefined to mean, well, nothing, really.

      I've already updated what our style guide says regarding this word to LITERAL, LITERALLY: Per the OED, the adverb has become purely a 'noise' word which must therefore be avoided. For the same reason, avoid employing the adjective as well, except in strict technical usage, e.g. when referring to a 'bare' representation of a value of a given type, e.g. 'binary literal', 'string literal', and so on.

      I have enough of a problem with _accepting_ ignorance much less _encouraging_ it.

      You are not alone, trust me. Words ought to mean things.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:End by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      You are not alone, trust me. Words ought to mean things.

      I was literally doing a crossword puzzle last night where the clue was "good (slang)" and the answer was "bad". And by literally, I mean literally (as in "not figuratively").

      Just felt like sharing. Good day, sir.

    5. Re:End by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between the bad bad and the good bad is only in the pronunciation.

    6. Re:End by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I hadn't thought about it, but, now that you mention it, you're right. Thanks for pointing that out.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  11. WTF... by gagol · · Score: 1

    One dictionnary that lost my restect: Oxford. Neologies shuld be carefully weighted, not a buzzword trend (*facepalm* I forgot we live in the age of buzzword and 6 months planning!)

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
    1. Re:WTF... by gagol · · Score: 1

      For the record, it is late and I make spelling mistakes, I know. Grammar Naz... please RESTrains yourselves.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    2. Re:WTF... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      We'll overlook the obvious typo, but the word for the thing that ought to be carefully weighed before it's added to the dictionary is neologism.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:WTF... by gagol · · Score: 1

      Not native english here, thank you for the pointer. Much appreciated.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    4. Re:WTF... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      I like to think of myself as a Language Authoritarian rather than a Language Nazi. ;) Glad to be of service.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    5. Re:WTF... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One dictionnary that lost my restect: Oxford. Neologies shuld be carefully weighted, not a buzzword trend (*facepalm* I forgot we live in the age of buzzword and 6 months planning!)

      6 months planning?! That's like half a year in Internet years! We don't have time for that shit.

  12. Fuck this planet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should've signed up to go to Mars.

  13. One of the first (NOT post, dammit) by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I actually looked up "twerking" on Google yesterday, and the first hit was from OED.

    I didn't realise it at the time, but I was likely amongst the first few people to see the OED entry--and had no idea that it had been added the same day--until I saw this story.

    I realise that times and language change, but, yeah, I suppose that I am feeling a bit of that "Stop the Internet, I want to get off thing" right now.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    1. Re:One of the first (NOT post, dammit) by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between changing a language and raping a language.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. TL;DR and TLDR links just 404 by burble · · Score: 1

    Their website apparently can't handle words with embedded semi-colons.
    However, you can get to the original definition page using Google Cache.

  15. Words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, what does half of these mean?
    I know I'm over 25, but still, never seen half the words used in written/spoken context..

    phablet, mooc, fomo. Are these purely used by american teens or have they just not spread to the rest of the grown up world yet?
    The rest have at least been in use for a short time as far as I've seen...

  16. Or perhaps brilliant satire and sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or perhaps brilliant satire and sarcasm?

    Alternatively - consider that what Cyrus shows to the world (talk shows, interviews, etc.) is basically a nerd that accidentally wound up in the music business (Because of connections and an odd kind of cuteness as a child.)

    Now she's grown up, and nobody, including herself, knows what to do with her. But she has enough star-power and inertia to keep doing something.

    You would think the nerds and geeks here would recognize and empathize with her situation. Besides, as awkward and "unsexy" as she is, 95% of the crowd here would give up a body part to sleep with her.

    1. Re:Or perhaps brilliant satire and sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      95% of the crowd here would give up a body part to sleep with her.

      That's not saying much; we're easy.

      Besides, if she's as vacuous as she appears I'd probably rather sleep with her mom.

    2. Re:Or perhaps brilliant satire and sarcasm? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      95% of the crowd here would give up a body part to sleep with her.

      Sleeping is easy enough without having to become an amputee.

  17. Bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dictionary shouldn't include worthless slang words that will be forgotten and unused in a year. Should at least wait for the word to stick around for several years.

  18. Re:Tworking? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    I'm a lifelong native speaker, and it looks and sounds plenty like English to me... a bit like "twerp", perhaps.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  19. Re:Tworking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AC you're replying to. I'm also a lifelong native speaker. We must be from different parts of the country, or perhaps different "native" countries. I'm from Texas.
    Twerp is fine because I've known it since early elementary, but twerk sounds distinctly German to me.

    Try the following: $ grep [^BPTYhijlpsuv]erk /usr/share/dict/american-english.
    No results! And the same is true for british-english.

    Of the ones that do match (in american-english), 19 are jerk, 10 are perk, 8 are clerk, and 5 are Berkeley/Berkshire.

    B: Berkeley, Berkshire = British places, or snobby places in California (5 matches)
    P: Perkins = British surname
    T: Terkel = no idea
    Y: Yerkes = no idea
    h: gherkin = British English
    i: Kierkegaard = Danish surname
    j: jerk (19 matches)
    l: clerk (8 matches)
    p: perk (10 matches)
    s: berserk
    u: sauerkraut = German
    v: overkill

    Now let's compare that to [BGWYcdfjnoptvw]ork
    Of those, 183 are work, 14 are cork, 13 are fork, 11 are snorkel, 7 are York (British), 6 are dork.

    Conclusion: Work is English; werk is not.

  20. TL; DR;... Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just embarassing....

  21. Re:Tworking? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Twerp is fine because I've known it since early elementary, but twerk sounds distinctly German to me.

    Confirmation bias. Look at how many English words come directly from German. The truth is that there's nothing about a word which sounds German which doesn't sound English as well, unless it's forty syllables long.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  22. WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These aren't tech words, they're marketspeak and PHB buzzwords - and WTF is "twerking"? I've been a developer for over 15 years, and I've never heard that one.

    And "Geek chic" isn't even a word, it's a snobbish fashionista slut TERM meant to drag *real* geeks into their little style and fashion universe where we'll be assimilated into modern pop culture - talk about burning in hell.

    Damn, even Oxford is falling into their trap. Of course, this is nothing new, they've been inducting these stupid colloquialisms as real Engrish for years now. Of course the language is evolving, now faster than ever before, but seriously? Twerking?

  23. This isn't actually true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to a story on slate, these words are not being added to the OED, but the oxford dictionary online.

  24. sigh by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Another prestigious institution going down in flames. Really, you don't need to add things every year just to add them.

    These fools ware helping to return language into a serious of grunts.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. LUIDODO by RedHackTea · · Score: 1

    When people ask me, "What does TL;DR mean?" I tell them LUIDODO! (lew - ee - dodo). It means "Look it Up In De ODO." I hope this gets put into the next revision.

    --
    The G
  26. Re:Tworking? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Just so you know: I'm a native of the Deep South. I'm primarily of Anglo-Irish descent, and all my ancestors were in North America prior to the American Revolution. (FWIW, I'm eligible for membership in the SAR, SAC, and the Mayflower Society.) Both my parents have Master's degrees (my mother's degrees are in English Lit and Library Science). Our family moved North (to the Midwest, actually) while I was in elementary school. After high school and a couple of years of college (still in the Midwest), I spent about 15 years in Appalachia, then a couple of years in CA/AZ. After that, I lived in Australia for several years before coming to Sweden nearly 7 years ago. I've been mostly a writer and editor by trade for the last 15 years, and before that I worked in broadcasting as an announcer and copywriter for nearly a decade. In all the standardised tests I've ever taken, I've ranked consistently in the 97th or better percentile in all categories relating to English.

    So I'd say that my credentials as a knowledgeable speaker and writer of English are pretty good.

    I also speak fair amount of German and Spanish, can get by in Swedish, and have recently started tackling Mandarin.

    And just so you don't think I'm just trying to impress you or whatever, I'll add that it's a damned good thing for me I can speak and write English as well as I do, since it makes me quite valuable here; I'd be in a tough spot without that ability, since I'm not that great a coder, and my mastery of spoken Swedish leaves a lot to be desired even though I've lived here for quite some time.

    The o in "work" is actually an example of the o+e ligature (which Slashcode filters out, dammit) or ö except that modern English orthography is allergic to special characters and diacritics. (Compare the pronunciation of the same vowel in horse or sport.)

    Make of all that what you will.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  27. Re:Tworking? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    The pronunciations of work, horse, and sport vary dramatically across different regions of the U.S.

  28. Orwell would be so.. proiud? by ChoosyBeggar · · Score: 1

    And the formation of "NewSpeak" marches on...

  29. Re:Tworking? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Not with regard to the vowel sound represented by the o in each of those words, even in those dialects in which the following r is turned into an approximant. In all cases, the vowel in "work" is fronted (as well as made rhotic, if you're going by the NBC Handbook of Pronunciation), while that in the other two is not.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  30. Re:Tworking? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

    Rhoticism is of course the main difference, but "work" can rhyme with "ork" in some dialects (West Virginia, Pittsburgh), "uck" (New England), "oik" (New Jersey) and "ark" (Appalachians).