Slashdot Mirror


High-end CPU Coolers Reviewed and Compared

jjslash writes "CPU cooling units are an often-overlooked but always important side of PC building, whether you're looking to overclock or you simply want a cool-running, silent system. It's also easy to get lost if you aren't an enthusiast who keeps tabs on the best options. TechSpot has rounded up 10 high-end CPU coolers (read: huge heatsinks) including top units from Noctua, Thermalright, Xigmatek, Silverstone and Thermaltake. If you're willing to spend the cash, they rate the Noctua NH-U14S as the best overall pick. For a tighter budget, the Thermalright offerings provide the best bang for your buck."

26 of 133 comments (clear)

  1. Silver by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

    If they are high-end, why are they silver and not black in colour?

    1. Re:Silver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they were really high-end they would be Gold.

      Actually, silver has higher thermal conductivity than gold, so it would be better for a heat sink.

    2. Re:Silver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the difference of the temperatures between the surrounding environment and the cooler is very small (a few ten degrees) so that radiated energy is nearly the same as absorbed (T1^4/ T2^4 is close to1). Also radiation surface is small (internal surfaces do not count - what is radiated by one is absorbed another surface) so in general only conventional heat exchange and airflow plays significant role.
      For that temperature differences having black anodizing is more-less just a fashion like having oxygen-free monster cables...

    3. Re:Silver by Cinder6 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "High End CPU Cooler" is as much of a scam as "High End Bottled Water".

      No, it really isn't. Besides having quantifiably better cooling capabilities, these high-end coolers are often much quieter. I have a Noctua NH-D14, and while it's not as pretty as, say, the Thermaltake FioOCK from TFA, I find it far superior to any stock solution I've ever used. I can't even hear the thing, despite it having two 120mm fans.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    4. Re:Silver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once again proving the old adage "Better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."

      While it is true that for most people a high end aftermarket cooler is not needed for many others it is a necessity.
      The stock coolers that come with cpus nowadays are far better than those of 10 years ago but they still leave a LOT to be desired.

      A truly good cpu cooler will ALWAYS improve the cooling of a computer and this can gain you lower temperatures with less noise or can allow the user to work the hell out of their cpu with high loads, heavy overclocking and higher than specified voltages (which help overclocking.)

      I have yet to see a computer that before (stock cooler) and after (high end or or water) temps were not improved by at least 7 or 8 degrees c.
      Anyone who thinks high performance cooling products are a "scam" is speaking without having any relevant knowledge on the subject.
      Period.

      There ARE a lot of aftermarket cooling solutions that are scams- performance is no better or quieter than stock and sometimes worse. These products are usually in the $15 to $45 price range. And yet there are also perfectly decent (though not great) solutions within that price range as well. Mostly $25 and up during sales and closeouts.

      Stock heatsinks are for light computer users, corporate machines and those who just post on facebook and twitter.

    5. Re:Silver by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      But seriously, I use the stock fan/heatsink that comes with the CPU and even with video encoding pushing all 6 cores to almost 100% I have no problems. "High End CPU Cooler" is as much of a scam as "High End Bottled Water".

      Well yeah. The stock heatsink is intended to keep it within the manufacturer's thermal envelope under normal use conditions.

      If you go outside the "normal use conditions" (overclocking, high ambient temperature, etc.) or want to get under the normal envelope (for potentially increased component longevity, etc. or want a unit with a bigger, slower spinning fan so it's quieter), a better cooler may be necessary.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:Silver by toddestan · · Score: 2

      That's why you make it out of silver and then plate it with gold - at least the part that would touch the CPU.

    7. Re:Silver by mcvos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not just overclocking, but noise. Many high end coolers are very quiet (some even passive), whereas stock coolers tend to be very noisy.

    8. Re:Silver by fast+turtle · · Score: 2

      A far better list of test results can be found at http://www.silentpcreview.com/ where they test the hell out of coolers and fans and other components. This POS "I No Nutink" Review is just slightly better then useless for those who actually "No Nutink".

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    9. Re:Silver by CBravo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      slower turning fans: quietness.

      --
      nosig today
    10. Re:Silver by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Basically there are three main reasons to use a high end CPU cooler.

      1: You will be operating the machine where ambient temperatures are high so you have less thermal margin for the cooler to work in
      2: You want to make the machine quieter under load. A larger radiator area means that the fans can achieve acceptable cooling at much lower speeds
      3: You want to seriously overclock. Serious overclocking can easilly double the power consumption of a CPU and that heat has to go somewhere.

      If none of those apply to you then stick with the stock cooler.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Silver by OneAhead · · Score: 2

      you actually can watch black surfaces cool off faster

      At normal CPU operating temperatures, no, you can't. The kind of temperatures at which your claim becomes plausible (in air at atmospheric pressure) would instantly render a silicon chip inoperable. You obviously didn't click on the link in my other post, where someone did the actual calculation, so who's not paying attention here?

      Also, I know this stopped being "news for nerds" a long time ago and that I cannot assume you're scientifically literate, so I apologize if this is over your head, but this here will explain why a CPU cooler in normal design conditions can't do (a significant amount of) radiative cooling.

    12. Re:Silver by hazeii · · Score: 2

      4: You want slow turning (or no) fans for reliability - especially now that PC hardware doesn't become obsolete so quickly.

      --
      All your ghosts are just false positives.
  2. Um, is this news? by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These sorts of reviews are done regularly, by dozens of websites. I like computer hardware news (its the industry I work in, after all) but please don't let every review or roundup out there make it to Slashdot.

    --
    William George
    1. Re:Um, is this news? by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

      Welcome to 10 years ago when this type of thing was posted weekly. I used to write reviews for Blarg, OCAU, [H], we loved getting on slashdot as we had 200,000+ referrals in 6 hours. Wonder how many hits from slashdot techspot will get?

    2. Re:Um, is this news? by Arkh89 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't worry, Slashdot already hit rock-bottom with this article...
      Or did they?

    3. Re:Um, is this news? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I might forgive it were it not doing that fucking "put content across 10 pages!!!" thing.

      Techspot: fuck you and fuck your attempts to make your articles worth ten times as much without actually doing ten times more work.

  3. No Cooler Master? by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 2

    Afaik, cooler master are the best from a price/performance ratio, where you get like 90% of the performance of a Noctua for half the price. It's like they never include this brand because it would be boring having it win the quality prize every time.

  4. Loudness rating? by omnichad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about cooling capability per dB for those of us who want to cool quietly and relatively cheaply? I don't care what cools the most. I'm not overclocking. What I care about is cooling enough without having to hear it.

    1. Re:Loudness rating? by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Noctua NH-D14 is an absolute monster. It silently cools my i5-2400 even while doing video encoding. It's why I bought the damn thing, so that I can enjoy the silence.
      (well, my GPU disagrees while I game but when that happens my ears are covered by headphones so I couldn't care less).

      If you want numbers, 4-core video encoding at 100% raises my CPU temperature to 55 degrees (Celsius) but I set the NH-D14 fans to start spinning when temperature goes over 60 degrees (Celsius).

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re:Loudness rating? by Sperbels · · Score: 2

      Yeah... the legendary NH-D14 was conspicuously missing from this review. Not even using any case fans right now. Just using this monstrosity.

  5. Re:Zalmon coolrs, because of dust by PendragonUK · · Score: 2

    The Zalman deals with dust, yep that's a good point. Shame they don't dissipate much heat... Sort of the whole point of a CPU cooler. I run Noctua NH-D14's and yes you are right I have to strip clean them a couple of times a year. On a plus point they do keep the CPU cool.

    --
    PendragonUK http://flavors.me/pendragonuk
  6. not really worth it anymore by Jumunquo · · Score: 2

    Chip clock speeds have sort of hit a ceiling, so beyond-factory overclocking doesn't do as much good anymore. What are you going to do with 10% more clock speed nowadays? If playing games, you'd just upgrade your video card. If you were really serious about overclocking, you'd water cool. There's just not much reason to eek out a tiny bit of cpu performance with slightly better air cooling. The stock Intel heatsink and fan is quiet and performs well, and there's not much reason to spend more money.

  7. Diamond Beats Everything by Dialecticus · · Score: 4, Informative

    If they were really high-end they would be Gold.

    It's a little known fact, but diamond has the highest thermal conductivity of any substance you're ever likely to encounter, beating silver by a whopping 350%. The only reason it's never used for thermal applications is that forming it into arbitrary shapes is almost beyond mankind's capability, and even if we did manage to do it, the cost would be astronomical. However, if it could somehow be done, and done cheaply, it would be the ultimate heat sink material.

    For comparison purposes, gold has about 33% higher thermal conductivity than aluminum, copper beats gold by about 26%, and silver in turn beats copper by about 7%, but not one of them is even in same league as diamond.

    This is most likely why diamonds earned the nickname "ice". You know how, at room temperature, metal feels colder than wood or plastic? This is because its higher thermal conductivity pulls the heat out of your hand more quickly. If you were to pick up a large enough diamond, it would feel extremely cold at first, just like a piece of ice.

    1. Re:Diamond Beats Everything by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 2

      If they were really high-end they would be Gold.

      It's a little known fact, but diamond has the highest thermal conductivity of any substance you're ever likely to encounter, beating silver by a whopping 350%. The only reason it's never used for thermal applications is that forming it into arbitrary shapes is almost beyond mankind's capability, and even if we did manage to do it, the cost would be astronomical. However, if it could somehow be done, and done cheaply, it would be the ultimate heat sink material.

      Thanks for that!

      Just recently saw a thermal compound with diamonds http://www.amazon.com/Innovation-Cooling-Diamond-Thermal-Compound/dp/B0042IEVD8 I didn't give it a second thought as someones always pushing a newer better compound. Guess I'll pick some up and give it a try.

  8. Graphene by Ottibus · · Score: 2

    It seems that Graphene has even better thermal conductivity than diamond and there is a more realistic chance of getting that into the right shape for a heatsink.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene#Thermal