Slashdot Mirror


NSA Posts Opening For "Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer"

cold fjord writes "The Hill reports, 'The National Security Agency has posted a job opening for a privacy and civil liberties officer. The position was first mentioned last month, when President Obama outlined his plans to bring more transparency to the NSA surveillance programs. A White House press release said the agency was "taking steps to put in place a full time Civil Liberties and Privacy Officer."' — From the NSA job posting: 'The NSA Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer (CLPO) is conceived as a completely new role, combining the separate responsibilities of NSA's existing Civil Liberties and Privacy (CL/P) protection programs under a single official. The CLPO will serve as the primary advisor to the Director of NSA for ensuring that privacy is protected and civil liberties are maintained by all of NSA's missions, programs, policies and technologies. This new position is focused on the future, designed to directly enhance decision making and to ensure that CL/P protections continue to be baked into NSA's future operations, technologies, tradecraft, and policies. The NSA CLPO will consult regularly with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence CLPO, privacy and civil liberties officials from the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice, as well as other U.S. government, private sector, public advocacy groups and foreign partners. '"

177 comments

  1. Newspeak? by jonr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or does anybody have the feeling that this job is probably the opposite of the title?

    1. Re: Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was thinking that rather than being the opposite that it would be a cube in the basement of a file room and given zero assistance from anyone, just "let us know if you see anything sketchy while you do whatever it is you feel like doing."

    2. Re:Newspeak? by moteyalpha · · Score: 2

      Is it just me, or does anybody have the feeling that this job is probably the opposite of the title?

      I am sure the fox will hire a chicken to guard the hen house.

    3. Re: Newspeak? by Cornwallis · · Score: 5, Funny

      And I've got the red stapler to go with the position.

    4. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His job description entails standing around telling the NSA to stop doing all of the things the NSA does. It's not going to matter whether he performs this duty faithfully or not.

    5. Re:Newspeak? by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 2

      Is it just me, or does anybody have the feeling that this job is probably the opposite of the title?

      Not at all. In fact it's exactly what it sounds like...

      On the internal memos where this fantastic new position is code-named "Token Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer". Or just "Token" for short. It's also referred to using the acronym, "LOL".

    6. Re: Newspeak? by jonr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget the sign on the door: "Beware of the Leopard".

    7. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair, titles can be misleading. I'd imagine the NSA has a sexual harassment officer too, but it isn't like that person's job is to defend sexual harassment.

    8. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be it is to let the rest of the guys know how much more Civil Liberties & Privacy can be taken away from everyone.

    9. Re:Newspeak? by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting how US rights are now just "maintained".

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    10. Re:Newspeak? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Either that or it's a job where you're given nothing to do until the next big leak comes out, then you become the sacrificial lamb and they hire a replacement, rinse and repeat.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    11. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say it's merely another justification for spending, and the person in question does nothing of significance. They identified a problem (backlash against their business model, NOT privacy invasion), and they came up with a solution (public relations and marketing, NOT backing down) which -- and here's the "brilliant" part -- justifies yet even more spending. There is no way they would consider anything that would actually reduce their level of spending.

      As for the conflict of interest for this new position -- it isn't just obvious; it's laughable.

    12. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The NSA doesn't have such a position. You are thinking of the TSA. A sexual harassment officer's job there is to sexually harass.

    13. Re:Newspeak? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's just PR and possible sacrificial lamb. Why would they hire someone just to violate liberties? That's like hiring someone to take the profits of your company off your hands.

    14. Re:Newspeak? by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      His job description entails standing around telling the NSA to stop doing all of the things the NSA does. It's not going to matter whether he performs this duty faithfully or not.

      If he doesn't get the authority to make anyone do what he says -- or even listen to him -- then he can perform his job as faithfully as he wishes while the NSA can carry on with its own. Everybody wins!

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    15. Re:Newspeak? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does anybody have the feeling that this job is probably the opposite of the title?

      Yeah, it sounds like a fancy name for media liaison. When the local police department was misbehaving, (I mean, more than usual) it was the job of the media liaison to minimize the damage. I'm sure this is something similar. We see a lot of this lately -- lip service to citizen concerns that are actually attempts to control the narrative.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    16. Re:Newspeak? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Not even. The job involves 99% playing Solitaire on your office computer, and 1% getting yelled at by Congress on camera whenever someone gets caught doing something.

    17. Re: Newspeak? by phrostie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      wasn't that what the "judges" job was?

    18. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That position is called Chief Executive Officer

    19. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, to be fair, titles can be misleading. I'd imagine the NSA has a sexual harassment officer too, but it isn't like that person's job is to defend sexual harassment.

      No, that's the sexual harassment defense officer's job. The sexual harassment officer doesn't defend it; he/she just does it.

    20. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CLPO will serve as the primary advisor to the Director of NSA for ensuring that privacy is protected and civil liberties are maintained by all of NSA's missions, programs, policies and technologies.

      Agree - without any teeth to actually stop abuse and bring the perpetrators to at the minimum, the public view, I see this much as an a guy/gal writing an FAQ that is meant really to preemptively rationalize bad/illegal behavior and refute any objections before hand. The position as described is great though - the Director says go talk to the Privacy Officer. The Privacy Officer says I've made my recommendations to the Director, go talk to him.

      Let me get my resume going - this could be a great way to get paid without actually doing anything.

    21. Re:Newspeak? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      His job description entails standing around telling the NSA to stop doing all of the things the NSA does. It's not going to matter whether he performs this duty faithfully or not.

      If he doesn't get the authority to make anyone do what he says -- or even listen to him -- then he can perform his job as faithfully as he wishes while the NSA can carry on with its own. Everybody wins!

      Just like in Soviet Union... Everyone WINS all expense paid vacation!!!!

    22. Re:Newspeak? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's just PR and possible sacrificial lamb. Why would they hire someone just to violate liberties? That's like hiring someone to take the profits of your company off your hands.

      Like some kind of lawyer? or Banker? Hummmm maybe I should talk more with the nice lobbyist about a few things....

    23. Re: Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree, this is the job of judges and journalists. But since the patriot act is a terrible law the judges cannot do their job. And since any information on prism is kept secret, the journalists cannot do their job.

      Obama is just digging himself furter into the matra: "Trust the allknowing government". So America remains what used to be bad: A police state.

    24. Re:Newspeak? by They'reComingToTakeM · · Score: 1

      "Civil Liberties and Privacy Officer" - pronounced "Scapegoat".

    25. Re:Newspeak? by clintp · · Score: 2

      Over the summer I learned that the medical research division at ARPA has one bio-ethicist on staff. He's completely overwhelmed, walks around in a horrified daze, and rubber stamps everything that lands on his desk (when they bother). This is third-hand, of course. I can't believe that a Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer for the NSA would be any more useful than just a PR stunt.

      --
      Get off my lawn.
    26. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like the ministries of love, and truth

    27. Re:Newspeak? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      It would make for a hilarious whistle blower story though. If it was me, the first day I had access to anything related to what the NSA is doing, it'd be on every major news outlet's desk within minutes. Would they really prosecute me for doing my job? Or for also attaching a picture to the press release of me outside the NSA building flipping it off? Probably, but it'd make a horribly ironic headline: "Civil Liberties and Privacy Officer at NSA blows the whistle on civil liberties and privacy violations at the NSA"

    28. Re:Newspeak? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If he doesn't get the authority to make anyone do what he says -- or even listen to him -- then he can perform his job as faithfully as he wishes while the NSA can carry on with its own. Everybody wins!

      Well, not exactly. I mean, we have to pay for this gelded position.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    29. Re:Newspeak? by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, to be fair, titles can be misleading. I'd imagine the NSA has a sexual harassment officer too, but it isn't like that person's job is to defend sexual harassment.

      Yeah, I can't tell you how disappointed I was with my company's sexual harassment training. I mean, I didn't learn any new techniques AT ALL.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    30. Re:Newspeak? by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Informative

      The fox is hiring a chicken to advise and consult on the security of the hen house.

      Specific Duties:
      a. Provide advice and guidance to the Director ...
      b. As the senior architect for CL/P, ensure that protections are addressed ...
      c. Represent the Agency on CL/P matters and serve as a liaison ...
      d. Responsible for broadly and, to the greatest extent possible, proactively explaining ...
      e. Manage CL/P policy, and advise ...
      f. Ensure adequate procedures are in place ...
      g. [rehash of point c]
      h. Provide CL/P reviews and assessments ...
      i. Provide testimony at Congressional hearings and special briefings ...
      j. Ensure that NSA leadership is informed of significant developments or changes in CL/P related ...
      k. Build partnerships with the public and private sectors ...

      Or in other words, someone with no actual authority.
      It has to be understood that this privacy officer is under the DNI.
      You know, the DNI, the individual responsible for all these privacy violations in the first place.
      There's no point in creating policy if the Director is only going to look at it as "advice and guidance"

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    31. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't say protect civil liberties and protect privacy, so the job could be anything....

    32. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have called it "privacy and civil liberties advocate" with the title of an NSA officer, i.e. authority to enforce the policy/advocacy.

      They should also seek the advice of ACLU, EFF, or other NGOs on the recommended qualifications of this position and the potential candidates.

    33. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh no ! Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. - redacted
      . it was laid out like a letter

      Address block

      Tel no:

      Date

      Dear ,

      We are pleased to off you the position of . commencing Please report at on at your campus for your initial indoctrination.

      Should you have any further questions please contact on . We are looking forward to seeing you then.

      Yours Sincerely

        "

    34. Re: Newspeak? by nbritton · · Score: 1

      Every CEO needs to be paired with a CJO. The Chief Judicial Officer operates a parallel organization which is funded by settlement winning secured against the primary institution.

    35. Re:Newspeak? by __aajfby9338 · · Score: 2

      Is it just me, or does anybody have the feeling that this job is probably the opposite of the title?

      It's not just you. In my opinion, when a government agency appoints an "{issue} Czar", that's a sign that they intend to do nothing meaningful about {issue}. When an entire organization's charter is to misbehave badly, appointing one person to advise on the issue is a pointless gesture meant to distract people from the problem. The problem of tens of thousands of people working in concert to eavesdrop on the communications of innocent people will not be affected in the slightest by one lone figurehead adviser. Massive problems require sweeping changes, not token gestures. But the powers that be do not want to correct the problem. To them, everything is working just the way they want it to.

    36. Re:Newspeak? by s.petry · · Score: 2

      Welcome to rhetoric!

      Right to Work Law: Employer rights, anti-union rules, no rights for employes.

      Citizens United: Allows "Corporations" rights of citizens. No benefit to citizens.

      Patriot Act: Dismembers the US Constitution and is anti-patriotic.

      Fusion Center: The area where information is distributed from one Government agency to another, not "fused".

      I'm guessing that this "Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer" will figure out ways around our Civil Liberties and Privacy, publish misinformation if they get caught, and generate FUD to extend operations.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    37. Re: Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking "Fall guy".

    38. Re: Newspeak? by davester666 · · Score: 2

      ....while you do whatever it is you feel like doing in your office.

      And no security clearance is required for the position, as the position will have the same access to information that the general public has.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    39. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more in the lines of that it is a bit like having a legal department at a company.
      If you have to ask an expert if something is legal then it is pretty likely that you already have a hunch that it is immoral. If it isn't immoral you wouldn't consider that it would be illegal in the first place.

      Saying that you need a "Civil Liberties & Privacy Officer" pretty much means that you intend to overstep the acceptable boundaries and want an expert to estimate when you are going to get shit for it.

    40. Re:Newspeak? by gmanterry · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does anybody have the feeling that this job is probably the opposite of the title?

      To the NSA and Obama administration I say "Bullshit!" It's just another smokescreen to the group that has admitted to lying to the American people and the Congress. I for one will never believe a word the government says again. Self serving political power mongers. I say this being a Marine Corps veteran.

      --
      Since when is "public safety" the root password to the Constitution?
    41. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not "newspeak", just the Law of Inverse Relevance.

      Just like the government agency responsible for war is called "defense", and the department for foreigners is called "state", and the agency responsible for pollution is called "environmental protection". And the agency responsible for obfuscation and misdirection is called "Central Intelligence".

      Exactly what the purpose of the National Security Agency is, is left as an exercise to the reader.

    42. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How frightening that you believe we haven't lost ground.

       

       

       

       

       
      Capcha: briefing

    43. Re: Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here is a play out...

      Hey we have an agent who is spying on his girlfriend is this legal? (response) what about all the other illegal spying you are doing? (agent) what the hell are you talking about? we watch "terrorists" activities. (CL&PO) right... well let me see what my x-girlfriends are up too..

    44. Re:Newspeak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds more like a position to promote their crooked behavior...

      The job description entails:

      k. Build partnerships with the public and private sectors and within the national security community to advance mission objectives

  2. Hmm by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This new position is focused on the future, designed to directly enhance decision making

    Does "shut down this agency permanently and don't replace it with anything similar" count as an enhancement?

    If we want to fight terrorism we could always stop installing dictators and manipulating the affairs of other nations.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    1. Re:Hmm by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure shutting down the NSA is the best option. Certainly a better option than "change nothing aside from promising you won't spy on citizens again," but it's probably still a bad idea to be so rash. And in the event that it is just closed, some other organization would just pick up right where they left off. Though I guess it's naive to assume that's not already happening.

    2. Re:Hmm by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 2

      I dunno. I think they've earned it. I only wish there was a BuSab to come in and solve this one.

      --
      Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    3. Re:Hmm by davydagger · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't go that far, but I'd curtail the agency to white hat hacking only, and instead letting them hoarde 0-day exploits, I'd make them post them on all the respective project's bugtrackers.

      that would do far more good than any offensive action.

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll believe the US adminstration is serious about cleaning up the NSA when they sack that lying Clapper and prosecute him for perjury.

      Oh, and when they shut down Cap'n Keith and his starship, FFS.

    5. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you want to be in the same situation again quickly, you don't prune weeds, you uproot them.

    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If we want to fight terrorism ..."?

      I think you meant to say "If we want to stop terrorism ...", but we really want to fight terrorism, therefore we install it, upgrade, export and support it by various means.

    7. Re:Hmm by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 1

      That's not rash; it's the only intelligent course of action. The entire organization is a piece of trash.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
  3. lowered expectations by Korruptionen · · Score: 2

    So, we're hiring a guy to report directly to the head of the NSA... so that he can report "hey, you're trampling everyone's privacy"... to which the director of the NSA can reply "I know." All of which we still will never know about.

    1. Re:lowered expectations by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      So, we're hiring a guy to report directly to the head of the NSA... so that he can report "hey, you're trampling everyone's privacy"... to which the director of the NSA can reply "I know." All of which we still will never know about.

      I'm sure they'll make better use of the "guy" (could be a girl) than that. It will be an ideal channel for disinformation. "Our privacy and civil liberties officer has forced us to reveal that we are scaling down our surveillance of Muslims", or "In line with the recommendations we are no longer issuing compromised SSL certificates", and so on.

    2. Re:lowered expectations by jbernardo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they'll make better use of the "guy" (could be a girl) than that. It will be an ideal channel for disinformation. "Our privacy and civil liberties officer has forced us to reveal that we are scaling down our surveillance of Muslims", or "In line with the recommendations we are no longer issuing compromised SSL certificates", and so on.

      In that is true, the position seems to have already been filled. I have no idea why cold fjord is advertising an opening for his own position at the NSA, unless he is overworked...

  4. Cushiest Job Ever by pngwen · · Score: 1

    All you do is just rubber stamp all the plans which cross your desk.

    Well, maybe you have to sort it into two piles. "Stuff we admit to" and "Stuff that will piss off the whole civilized world" Still, this would be very easy. It's the only job which will do less than a police departments internal investigation board!

    --
    I am the penguin that codes in the night.
  5. PATRIOT act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Most unpatriotic act ever. So, yes, all Govt names are EXACTLY opposite of what they say.
    Going by that, this guy is going to be tasked with infringing MORE, without even trying to hide it.

    1. Re:PATRIOT act by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      True. But his/her official role (as opposed to the real role. . . ) is to provide a semblance of top-cover.

      "But our Civil Liberties and Privacy Officer is investigating, and will report their findings when the investigation is complete. . ."

      Which will appease all but the loudest sheeple. . .

    2. Re:PATRIOT act by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      True. But his/her official role (as opposed to the real role. . . ) is to provide a semblance of top-cover.

      "But our Civil Liberties and Privacy Officer is investigating, and will report their findings when the investigation is complete. . ."

      Which will appease all but the loudest sheeple. . .

      Yes, the officer is currently investigating case number 5. Of course, we get 20 million complaints per day, so it may take some time before the officer gets to your particular issue. Why, we've been talking about maybe even hiring the officer an assistant, but so far we haven't posted a position.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  6. I assumed it'd be shut down by ggpauly · · Score: 1

    didn't anybody read Snowden's leaks?

    --
    Verbum caro factum est
    1. Re:I assumed it'd be shut down by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      No one seems to care, apparently.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:I assumed it'd be shut down by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Hahaha.

      Sure. The magical unicorn of freedom and democracy shut it all down. ;)

  7. Need to allow this official to be transparent by stewsters · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This official needs to have the ability to publicly whistle blow on anything he sees. If all he can do is report back to the NSA on his findings, no one will hear of it and nothing will change.

    1. Re:Need to allow this official to be transparent by omnichad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The NSA will tell him what whistle to blow. He wouldn't be a very good distraction if he didn't "find" things.

    2. Re:Need to allow this official to be transparent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He'll be so transparent nobody will ever see or hear from him.

  8. Highly controversial comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA simply needs his Timothy McVeigh. Fuck 'em.

    1. Re:Highly controversial comment by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

      I am aware that this comment was a troll, but I do feel compelled to point out that such an event would retroactively justify all of the NSA's surveillance, provide an concrete demonstration that their surveillance was too limited and needs to be greatly expanded (and kept more secret).
      Basically, it would cement the NSA's spying permanently into place for good.

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  9. Racial Sensitivity and Ethics Officer by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow I feel this position will be as effective as a Racial Sensitivity and Ethics Officer aboard a Slave Ship.

  10. Collateral damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder who will get fired next time widespread law breaking at the agency is made public. Hint: probably not the director who authorised it.

  11. Yet another waste of space by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Just shut these losers down and replace them with real military instead of idiot toy soldiers playing in Star Trek sets.

  12. The job will involve... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...explaining to the public why they can't have these things anymore.

    1. Re:The job will involve... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Hiring sockpuppets to get onto web 2.0 and help reshape the conversation around privacy laws derived from a "living document".
      The domestic targets will argue themselves into amusing new directions on that topic.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  13. Applicants of genus capra preferred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, the main objective will be to serve as a scapegoat.

    To serve and protect...

  14. Shadow government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else gotten the feeling that "The President" and "Congress" are no longer anything other than just a show? That there is some kind of shadow government which is actually controlling things like the NSA. It may be time for a true violent revolution.

    1. Re: Shadow government by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    2. Re:Shadow government by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Nope - I don't let either branches off the hook that easily.

    3. Re:Shadow government by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Well have you noticed the president sounds like a fucking zombie... Rule of Law, Rule of Law, Rule of Law.... I think they put something in his food....

  15. Wanted: Feckless Patsy by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Government-owned crime syndicate needs clownish do-nothing to stand around like a deer in headlights while taking the blame for coworkers' malfeasance by virtue of a blatantly dishonest job title. Flexible hours, competitive pay and benefits.

  16. "Civil Libertities" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If this goes the way things like this seem to go they will get Dick Cheney to fill it.

    1. Re:"Civil Libertities" by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      If this goes the way things like this seem to go they will get Dick Cheney to fill it.

      Now now the NSA isn't that evil... You're thinking the FBI... They have been violating the law since the very start!

  17. Only power for that official that matters by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ability to instantly and unilaterally declassify anything, without any fear of retribution.

    Fat chance.

  18. Hire Patrick Swayze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's probably looking for a good job right now and we saw how skilled he was the first time he was a Ghost.

  19. Personally... by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

    I nominate an adorable puppy. They will protect our civil liberties as much as whomever they decide to hire will be able to, will be more adorable than any adult human, and will work for costs significantly below minimum wage. They would probably even be good for morale within the NSA.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Personally... by omnichad · · Score: 2

      I think the NSA's cat video program has already had a much higher participation rate. They've been able to track millions of people through views. Who else do you think posts all these videos?

    2. Re:Personally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I nominate an adorable puppy.

      We'll have to check this with the Fluffy Bunnies and kittens act of 2004, which authorized the invasion of several undisclosed countries at the President's discretion, and enhanced torture techniques. Most people don't realize it covers puppies too.

  20. Fall guy by rfrenzob · · Score: 2

    Wanted: Someone to take the public's wrath and the shocked outrage of Congress the next time there is a scandal.

    By accepting this position, you acknowledge and accept that you will be terminated during or immediately after the required investigation during the next scandal.

    Benefits include full medical, dental, vision, 5 weeks a year vacation.

    1. Re:Fall guy by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      I'll take it. The second sentence is just nonsensical since Congress would never really investigate the NSA. They would hold hearings of course. The stoog....the CL/P officer would dance around the questions and all would go home with the knowledge that the USofA is still safe from evil doers (and we know who you are). What amazes me in regards to the "position" is that if the existing personally just subscribe to existing laws (ZOMG) there would be no need for such a lackey reporting to the director. The CL/P should be Congress. The CL/P should be the President. Yet somehow a government agency needs another body to tell them they are acting against the law of the land and "they better darn well stop that or else"...what? So to the NSA (who I knopw regularly reads /.), let me know who to send my resume to for review. I can work from home, I can read, and with a minor bump in pay (or a new tractor) I can parrot anything you want me to say. (Oh wait, that sounds like I'm running for office)

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    2. Re:Fall guy by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Congress, the president, and the managers at the NSA all have conflicts of interest. The law of the land says "action X is illegal", but the NSA isn't really doing X... they're doing almost-but-not-quite-X action Y. Neither Congress or the president will stop them, because they want the results and don't care how it happens.

      This position should be arranged so they have the power to say "We can't do X, because of these particular reasons", but can then approve Z which is just different enough to be legal. Whereas the rest of the NSA measures success by disrupting enemy plots and weakening enemy technology, the CLPO would measure success by the (lack of) programs that are questioned in those hearings.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  21. Who would want to work there anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who would want to work there anymore?

    Whoever they hire is going to have camera's and microphones up their butt, in their home, with everything they ever do or have done on the internet recorded and scrutinized for the rest of their lives. wait...

    1. Re:Who would want to work there anymore? by AHuxley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      People who know its a pathway to becoming a contractor.
      People who know its the path to getting a pension.
      People who know its the path to clearances that ensures future funding.
      People who know its the path to clearances that ensures future tech and math job security.
      People who know they want to work with telco, crypto and math with a real budget and as a core mission.
      Second and third generations with clearances.
      The ideological testing for the next gen admins will be expensive. Internal file encryption and more compartmentalisation will have to be contracted in too.
      Less people, no trust, more work, been recorded, been scrutinized, ever more domestic data to sort, languages via new contractors..
      Spy agencies who put their staff under that kind of pressure always know the results long term.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  22. Actual job: by darrellg1 · · Score: 1

    Make sure we are able to hide any infringements on civil liberties.

  23. Just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's odd that they're not even trying to convince foreigners that they should continue using US based web services. That's, after all, where the money really comes from.

    1. Re:Just wondering... by qbast · · Score: 1

      Probably because foreigners continue to use US based web services without any convincing.

  24. Mining Companies by JabrTheHut · · Score: 1

    This reminds of how the Australian mining companies stopped growing environmental awareness from impacting their business. They lobbied the Australian Government, and the environmentalists moved from being government employees to mining company employees. I've heard mining company environmentalists say things like "We're not as bad as other mining companies when it comes to pollution" and "Some mining companies don't let their environmentalists leave their office. We have much more freedom" without a trace of irony.

    This position will have the same effect. Whoever takes it will find themselves saying "We're better than Google when it comes to people's privacy" without even a trace of Fe to be found.

    --
    Work like no one is watching. Dance like you've never been hurt. Make love like you don't need the money.
  25. Ooh! by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd shoot them a resume but I hear Wally from Dilbert already got the job.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  26. Who should apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden should send his CV for starters.

  27. Candidates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can think of two people who would be really, really good at this, but I think they might have some visa problems getting over for the interview.

  28. Trust us, we're the government! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need... a guy... yep, a guy to make sure that the millions of dollars we spend on illegally spying on the American public don't get spent illegally spying on the American public. That will fix it! Now look away...

  29. Senior Shouting Officer: by Hartree · · Score: 1

    I can't be the only one to think that. :)

  30. That is a job..... by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 1

    I really would not want. You are basically the NSA's scape goat. Any privacy related issues would have to go through you and you would become the NSA's whipping boy. Even if you agree with what the NSA is doing, that job has gotta be frightening.

  31. Resume by puddingebola · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have 42 years experience as a human rights adviser for the United States government.

    1976-1978 Special adviser in Iran to Mohammad Reza Pahlavi

    1980-1982 Special adviser in Indonesia for Suhartro on civil liberties.

    1982-1989 U.S. embassy Chile. Served as adviser to Augusto Pinochet on civil liberties.

    1. Re:Resume by Bosconian · · Score: 1

      Your necessary qualifications should also include Cognitive Dissonance (Level IV, but if you believe you're a Level V, we will accept that) and Reality Distortion Warp experience (6 years in a public-facing position. We noticed you wrote "3 years" here but after tallying the total experience reported worked, your history qualifies.)

      --
      Scarce, scared, scarred, sacred... -Col. Bruce Hampton
    2. Re:Resume by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Hummm wait a minu ..... o right! you're HIRED! First order of business kill Larry in IT he looks like a hippy...

  32. No teeth by Virtucon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This position has no teeth and will exist as a figure head when people and the "shocked" congressional delegates bring up questions of what the NSA is doing.

    That way when congress starts up their faux hearings regarding NSA breaches of law and privacy you have put this figure head up there right next to the Director and when a question of Civil Liberties, violations of privacy etc. come up he can just deflect and say "Let me turn you over to our Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer who will address your questions."

    The NSA needs to go and the CIA needs to absorb the foreign intelligence functions that the NSA is supposedly mandated to perform. What still stinks to high shit is the recent budget that was passed in the house curiously doesn't de-fund the NSA so consider all the members of congress as violators of your rights and in violation of protecting and defending the Constitution. Considering there's an election in 13 months for Congress and 1/3 of the Senate seats, it's time to start sending a message to these arrogant fucktards that our Privacy and Civil Liberties should not become bargaining chips for passing legislative acts, they're rights we all need to fight for. Send money to the EFF and the ACLU and start getting your friends, family and colleagues informed about the issues we all face and frankly, vote all of these morons out of office because the constant money machine in politics and congressional re-election rates (over 70%) is killing your rights.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:No teeth by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      The NSA needs to go and the CIA needs to absorb the foreign intelligence functions that the NSA is supposedly mandated to perform.

      LoL
      What makes you think the CIA will be any better of a steward for civil liberties?
      The CIA undoubtedly engages in all kinds of scandalous, but classified, activities that would piss off the American public too.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:No teeth by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Well you still have a foreign intelligence requirement, that's what the CIA was founded to do but now you have it splintered off into various sub agencies that all are pretty much redundant to one another. Putting them under one agency gives you the ability to consolidate them into one basket then watch that basket. Right now I think it's a bit unwieldy that you have the 15 other agencies in the US Federal Government that are chartered with intelligence gathering and analysis. All of these agencies have budgets and mandates that in some respects mirror that of their peers. So that begs the question: Why? A lot has to do with budgetary control and carving up your tax dollars in the name of separate missions but I also think it has to do with being able to hide the misdeeds and conduct operations under different hats to hide the cheese from the public. Congress has created legislation that has allowed this to happen so I would argue not that they are truly protecting the public but protecting donations from consulting firms and defense contractors all in the name of keeping power by getting re-elected. The people in this country need to start voting these people out of office and to break up the two party stranglehold that is killing our democracy.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    3. Re:No teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... vote all of these morons out of office ...

      People tried that with "hope and change". It didn't work as the new leader just followed the status quo, then gave the bureaucrats more power to break the rules.

      Next, you don't decide who stands for office. That's decided by entrenched interests like corporate donors. They choose someone who understands that laws protects the rich or is reasonably obedient. Remember how Mitt Romney promoted 'no welfare' and other Republican party ideals then recanted when popular opinion reviled him?

    4. Re:No teeth by AlphaWoIf_HK · · Score: 1

      People tried that with "hope and change".

      Because they were gullible imbeciles. Some research would have told them that that is a very, very bad idea, but since they don't bother to do that, or are more interested in making sure the guy they really, really despise doesn't get into office, the cycle continued.

      --
      Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
  33. And hereafter, the NSA shall be known as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Ministry of Privacy

  34. Can I nominate Edward Snowden? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only remotely plausible candidate. Um... hopefully he can work remotely.

  35. Worst Job Ever by cookYourDog · · Score: 2

    Look what happened to the last guy who decided to fulfill the requirements of this job - he sought asylum in Russia!

    1. Re:Worst Job Ever by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Look what happened to the last guy who decided to fulfill the requirements of this job - he sought asylum in Russia!

      O no... CHINA then Russia... that says a lot right there... Doesn't sound like some shit I'd be wanting to do unless scared shitless... He's probably having tea right now with kindly Vlad-amir... More isotope with ur tea Mr snowden?

  36. Proxy approval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's the classic 'approval by proxy' that worked in the UK.

    In the UK they appointed a data registrar who job title is 'data protection', and whose legal basis is the EU privacy act. Yet he's not there to *enforce* the privacy act, he's there to approve the *exemptions* to the act. So he spends his time approving all manner of privacy invading uses for UK citizens data by giving his approval to their use (on your behalf, not that you're ever asked or the details told to you even).

    It was a slimey lawyer trick courtesy of Tony Blair (a lawyer).

    Here, he's appointing someone to represent US Citizens and 'approve' the misuse of their private data, obtained in violation of their rights. As if he can give proxy approval for the surveillance.

    It's a slimey lawyer trick, courtesy of Obama (a lawyer).

    I really thought Obama would be different, yet he gets into power and it's clear he's just the smiley face on the military machine, same as the last guy.

    1. Re:Proxy approval by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      I really thought Obama would be different...

      Oh really?? Obviously you weren't paying attention.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Proxy approval by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I really thought Obama would be different, yet he gets into power and it's clear he's just the smiley face on the military machine, same as the last guy.

      Told you so. Vote third party or stay home.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Proxy approval by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Told you so. Vote third party or stay home.

      Only 38% of Americans voted in the last election. Only 20% of Americans voted for the current President.

      Perhaps Duverger's Law is at least felt, if not completely understood.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Proxy approval by 3dr · · Score: 1

      38%? Are you sure?

      "... Thursday's report, from the Center for the Study of the American Electorate, put 2012 voter turnout at 57.5% of all eligible voters." - http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/national/election-results-2012-voter-turnout-lower-than-2008-and-2004-report-says

      And the Bipartisan Research Center, clearly a liberal media tool, also reports 57.5%. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections

      I could go on. Oh, and finally, if only 20% voted for Obama, then by your stats only 18% voted for Romney. You weren't trying to imply 80% was against Obama, were you?

    5. Re:Proxy approval by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      57.5% of all eligible voters

      You said 'eligible voters'. I said 'Americans'. The distinction is purposeful, because we were talking about people who just refuse to vote (and secondarily all those who are ruled by those who do).

      You weren't trying to imply 80% was against Obama, were you

      No, of course not.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  37. Yes you do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really would not want. You are basically the NSA's scape goat. Any privacy related issues would have to go through you and you would become the NSA's whipping boy. Even if you agree with what the NSA is doing, that job has gotta be frightening.

    Look it - this is a GOVERNMENT position here - not corporate.

    IN other words, you'd be paid 6 figures or so (can't tell exactly what the job requires or pays because the link is requiring a PeopleSoft login! WTF! Subby!) and it'd be CUSHY as all hell! Sure, there may be on occasion dealing with Congress' grandstanding horseshit, but you'd be crying all the way to the bank.

    AND when - not if - when you have to resign, then you get a nice 7 figure lobbying job, use of private corporate jets, and all the loose women and drugs you could ever ask for.

    Government work at this level is a guaranteed path to being rich, getting power, and settin' up the rest of your family.

  38. Translation: Spy on citizens, not us. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And we'll want a spy in your organization to make sure you don't spy on us.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  39. Let me be the first to nominate... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 2

    His job description entails standing around telling the NSA to stop doing all of the things the NSA does....

    Let me be the first to nominate Bruce Schneier for the position.
    http://www.technologyreview.com/news/519336/bruce-schneier-nsa-spying-is-making-us-less-safe/

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  40. Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA has lost all credibility with the American people. Nothing can repair that after the string of lies and revelations. That means if there are any upstanding people still working there they will become increasingly demoralized and leave, to be replaced by more sociopaths with despotic leanings. the NSA will become more of the threat to our freedom that it has already proven itself to be. when these revelations first came to light, if the president had immediately cleaned house over there then it might have stood a chance of recovering public esteem. but the president did the exact opposite and that chance has vanished.

    So the question is, what now? I suggest civil disobedience on every level. put congress, the president, the NSA, and the ultra-wealthy who pull all their strings under the same panopticon they have put on us. let them know what it is to have every move known and exposed. shun them at every level. flag them on the citizen's equivalent of the "no fly" list. make it clear that we know them for the scum they are. peer pressure is a powerful motivator, even for sociopaths, and it may be enough to avert the drastic measures that lie beyond. but if they aren't, drastic measures must remain on the table or our children, grand children, and great grand children will be slaves who curse our cowardice.

    1. Re:Agreed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSA has lost all credibility with the American people.

      Unfortunately, no they haven't. They've lost credibility with us few people that actually follow what they're doing, but the vast unwashed masses of the American public just don't care. This is compounded by the news media, even if they do report it, completely softball and downplay the reports. Until it starts taking away the average Joe's American Idol and McDonalds, they're really not going to care.

    2. Re:Agreed by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Revolutions never succeed without the support of at least SOME of the upper classes. When they succeed, they usually create a government that is worse than the one they replace.

      Note that Revolutions are different from expulsion of foreign rulers, which is what the US.1776.revolution was. And what the US.Civil War.1865 attempted unsuccessfully to be. Also note that the 1776 revolution was only possible with the support of the French government. And LONG lines of communication and supply. Even so it was a close thing.

      Coup d'états are much more commonly successful, but they, also, rarely improve things for anyone except the new top dogs. They tend to occur when the populace ceases to support the government, so it doesn't care that the new government is a gang of murders. So was the old one. They usually require the support of the military. They always require at least it's acquiescence.

      I feel that the US is approaching the degree of popular distain that encourages coup d'états. I don't see a revolution as at all plausible.

      OTOH, I am aware that I don't know much about the popular feeling. Only a few people in a small local area. And I don't trust the media to even lie consistently, so they're no help. So I could be quite wrong about how much people dislike the government. Distain seems to be coming from every corner of the political spectrum (NOT a one dimensional framework, but multidimensional...and still distain from every corner), but this is unreliable. People who are unhappy are always louder than those who are content.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  41. missing from description by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    primary job functions: bullshit shoveling, towing the company line, smiling and looking pretty.

    primary qualifications: proficient liar, ability to verbosely respond to any query without really 'saying' anything.

    1. Re:missing from description by dcollins117 · · Score: 1

      No one with integrity need apply.

  42. Some things you want on your resume' by rbrander · · Score: 1

    Good background would include:

    - Environmental officer for a West Virginia mountaintop-removal coal company

    - Human rights officer for the Syrian Army

    - Risk Management officer for Lehman Brothers

    - PhD from the Sorbonne in empty gestures

    1. Re:Some things you want on your resume' by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      You forgot

      - Spokesman for the White House

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
  43. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We got too much heat and need a scapegoat. If you wish you had an important sounding job and don't mind getting served up to a hoard of starving dogs, please apply. Thanks from your law breaking agency, the NSA.

  44. Here's a question... by petrus4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Possibly slightly offtopic; but is there any legal avenue that could be persued, towards the eventual goal of having the NSA abolished?

    1. Re:Here's a question... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      There is only so much political power, funding and prestige within the US gov.
      Recall where the NSA was seen to be in the early-mid 1990's?
      Note where the NSA got to in the past ~10 years. Funding, staff, political access do not just get created..
      Other contractors and agencies felt that rearrangement as them not winning.
      In the West you go to the press until you get your funding back and the old order is restored.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Here's a question... by spottedkangaroo · · Score: 1

      It's called shoveling money to the EFF. They won something sorta recently along these lines, but there's a long way to go.

      --
      Imagine if you weren't allowed to use roads because a bus company complained about your driving 3 times. --skunkpussy
    3. Re:Here's a question... by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Not with the people we presently elect and reelect into office. It cannot happen under these circumstances.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    4. Re:Here's a question... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      is there any legal avenue that could be persued

      Depends on your jurisdiction.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Here's a question... by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

      Sure, vote in enough Congressional representatives who are willing to defund or abolish it. Near zero chance of that happening as Americans are too busy...hey, wait...my show's on! What was I saying?

  45. Argyl or Cotton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA doesn't mention what kind of sock this new puppet is to be made of.

  46. Eric Snowden we need you now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it obvious? The one guy who would give up everything to enlighten others.
    He might work on line from Russia.

  47. It's a Marketing Job by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    The posting itself is slashdotted right now, but I'd bet dollars to donuts the requirements include a long list of marketing skills, since that is undoubtedly what this job really is.

  48. website for application by nimbius · · Score: 3, Funny

    We here at the NSA would like to thank slashdot for its interest in this position.
    Due to overwhelming traffic, our website may become inaccessible from time to time. should you find yourself unable to connect or submit your CV, please try these steps:

    1. calmly speak your resume into any cellphone, preceded by one or more of the words: "Terror, Obama, Occupy, Syria"
    2. Purchase one Quran, Disposable mobile phone, and one tank of propane to speak with a member of our team about the job opening.
    3. open a copy of your CV in any Microsoft Operating System.

    regards,
    oscar nascar pickle marmalade1234
    NSA Human Resources

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  49. I predict the winner of the job search! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    Col. Flagg of MASH, or his life-a-like

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  50. Oh well everything is fixed now. by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Everyone go home... false alarm.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  51. You've never worked government, have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Four figure? Definitely. Maybe just about into five figures. Not even the president of the USA gets a high five-figure salary.

    At high levels, though (or even lower down, depending on how well you'll sell yourself to lobbies), the payoff isn't anything to do with government payouts AT ALL. It's a job to a position in commercial business on six or even seven figure (if you count in benefits) salaries for a job well done for the companies who are impeded by the nominal activities of the department you worked for.

    Government payout is extremely shit.

    But if you get to Washington, DC, the job gets you CONNECTIONS. And those connections will be getting you a PRIVATE INDUSTRY job that will pay a pension many times the size of your salary (even including any benefits) of the government job you had.

  52. Yeah Right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hardy-Har-Har. Much like advertising for a "abstinence officer" in a Nevada Brothel.

  53. There Already Is One by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "the judiciary". Maybe the NSA should try listening to it?

  54. In Soviet America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this was of Russia, many "In Soviet Russia..." memes would have been posted. Sorry, I cannot think of any for this country (and I sure heck can't figure how to login. I login but going to articles, it has me 'logged out').

    1. Re:In Soviet America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if this was of Russia, many "In Soviet Russia..." memes would have been posted. Sorry, I cannot think of any for this country (and I sure heck can't figure how to login. I login but going to articles, it has me 'logged out').

      NSA has opened a competition for the best political joke in this thread.
      First prize: 10 years vacation in Cuba!

  55. More like Civil Liberties & Patsy Officer by decep · · Score: 1

    The NSA violated your Civil LIberties, you say? The CLPO was not doing his job.

    The terrorist blew up another buiding, you say? The CLPO will not let us do our job.

    This post is like being in charge of IT Security.

  56. Amended Job Title by maroberts · · Score: 1

    Taking Liberties with Privacy Officer

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  57. What a great opportunity! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    We'll get to actually meet cold fjord during the interview. Though he'll probably conduct it from behind a one way mirror.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  58. Some Questions by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

    1. Who gets to choose the appointee from the applications received?

    If anyone inside the current system has a say (and that includes Congress and the President), the selected person will have no credibility.

    2. Are background checks and/or security clearances required?

    If so, then all credible candidates are probably excluded.

    --
    Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
    1. Re:Some Questions by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      Polygraph at the job interview is most likely. FBI does it.

      Plenty can be done with good employees to keep them in line. The system rewards the entrenched who maintain the status quot and enemies will even collaborate. Organizational politics exist everywhere; the bigger the org the more can go on. private or public.

      We have a culture that rewards crooks and punishes any true accountability; it's reflected in our private sector and our public sector. We look up to the slimy traits that make for successful lawyers, salesmen, etc. Money/power are all that matter and the ends justify the means despite what people may say - they are hypocrites. But then in a society so full of BS we desperately crave authenticity, being hypocritical is minor. (reality TV, "gritty realism", organic, being candid, no heroes..)

      The only thing one must do is to NOT hire somebody who can make a huge fuss in the media; otherwise, anybody would do - you can keep them in line until they resign and hardly make a blip in the public's eye. Plus large orgs are hard to fathom - you can keep'm busy distracted with minor stuff. This can be done mindlessly by just hiring a parent above 25 years old (when the idealism is likely gone + the children are young enough to be a major burden.)

  59. Breaking news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in late breaking news, the New York Mafia is advertizing for a Law Enforcement officer.

    [Oops, they've probably got lots already ...]

  60. Chief White Wash Officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A pretty old idea, in years gone by known as a Soothsayer.

  61. CLPO? yeah, effective is he's informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A post like that is pure bullshit unless he's got the highest level of clearance and is informed of every operation the NSAis conducting. Which I find highly unlikely. I'll chalk this up to fall-guy, lip-service, or window-dressing until they announce his clearance level.

  62. Yeah, right... by kefalonia · · Score: 1

    ... some US fellows are about to learn Separation of Powers(and Duties) all over again...

  63. Privacy Officer Job Description by kawabago · · Score: 1

    Never show up.

    1. Re:Privacy Officer Job Description by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Never show up.

      So they're considering Major Major Major Major for the job?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  64. That will work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expanding the bureaucracy will not increase transparency. Actually it will do just the opposite and add another layer of abstraction.

  65. It's a seek and destroy mission by real+gumby · · Score: 1

    You need to have a civil liberties officer to keep an eagle eye out to make sure there aren't any civil liberties escaping into the wild.

  66. Impossible Job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To oversee that what could be hundreds of millions of potential breaches in civil liberties and privacy perhaps annually, and in that only one position is available is a little impossible to believe will do anything to safeguard American civil liberties and privacy.

  67. Not a job I'd like to have. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Being the guy who has to say no sucks. Worse if you have none of the authority and all of the responsibility when things go to poo.

  68. Come back to reality people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find it strange how everyone exerts hate toward the government, and yet nobody has a problem feeding their personal information to companies such as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Verizon, Comcast, LinkedIn, gas stations, surveys, etc. Companies that take your information, put it into the cloud, perform analytics on it, and actually make a profit from it and sell it to partners. Funny how we'll hand over our information when it comes down to convenience or a service being provided to us, but when its another entity that actually has our best interests in mind (in most cases) and does not stand to make a profit from our information and actually doesn't give a damn the new shirt your grandmother bought suddenly we're all up in arms. Come back to reality people, I can buy your information for $10 online and its easier and more detailed than the NSA has on American citizens.

  69. Thanks, But No ... by Crypto+Cavedweller · · Score: 0

    Filed this one under "Jobs I am actually qualified for but would never try to do in a million years because I like my sanity."

  70. Privacy Theatre by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    We might need to coin a new term for this. Just as the TSA, et al, practice "security theatre", the NSA will be practicing "privacy theatre". That is to say, seemingly taking steps to protect privacy and civil liberties, but really just doing business as usual.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  71. THE GESTAPO WANTS AN OFFICER by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4

    The Gestapo office of "Civic Concern and Redress" is looking for an administrative leader.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  72. "Job Responsibilities" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, the following "Job Responsibilities" were noted?

    -Must be willing to look the other way when witnessing illegal/immoral/unconstitutional activities
    -Must be willing to sign documents blindfolded
    -May not have any previous employment and/or history in privacy/civil liberties related fields.
    -Will be Require to submit to several polygraph test a year and attest to a complete lack of any desire to notify public of illegal/immoral/unconstitutional activities

    Seriously though no one in their right minds can believe that this position will have ANY real power. Even if they are given the ability to review documents, questions personnel & conduct inspections I highly doubt that any report that is critical of the NSA will ever see the light of day.

  73. Smoke and mirrors by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    I don't know what the point is -- they'll still have their Ultra-Mega room of highest top secret, where they will listen in on what they want anyway. And that's the room where a rogue might listen in on political opponents.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  74. Another sinecure by MikeLip · · Score: 1

    I'm guessing the uncle or sister of some senator will get this job, and never be allowed to do a days work except to sit for pictures in their entire tenure.

  75. This is pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work in military intelligence in the SIGINT area and from how I remember the way things worked the whole idea of these type of positions is ludicrous. The reason for much of the lack of oversight of the NSA in the first place is the extremely high degree of compartmentalization upon which it prides itself. The left thumb and its 4 neighbors have little clue how they are all actually working together as a hand and the rest of the arm couldn't care less what each of the fingers are doing, as long as the hand and elbow behave as expected and not member of that entire arm has a clue what any component of the other arm is up to let alone the rest of the body, but in the end the body does its thing, whether that's writing a novel of fondling a child. The NSA and similar spook organizations work in a very similar manner. There is no oversight because their very structure prohibits it. So any feelly-good jobs that they setup such as the ones mentioned in the article are a load of shit. Whoever gets the job will not have access to enough of the big picture to make any kind of assessment as to what is really going on.

  76. What position will really be by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    PR Manager

  77. My Thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hire Ted Nugent or someone of that ilk.
    Give the NSA a really good dose of where this whole scenerio should be going.

    This whole thing is F.U.B.A.R. Someone seriously should be going to prison over this, preferably starting with the politicians who said this was "OK" and the Judge that agreed.

    Just sayin'

  78. Ah ... no. That would be my answer until I was fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah ... no. That would be my answer until I was fired everytime they wanted to spy on American citizens without a valid (non-FISA) court order.

    1 or 2 days? Would I last that long?

  79. This is what they do. by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

    This is nothing more the misdirection do not be fooled. They will no have no power and can do NOTHING to stop this. Not a dang thing.

    --
    NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
  80. Universal Surveilance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have thought they've already interviewed all the possible applicants. Let them just send an offer to whichever of us is the best candidate.

  81. No experience necessary by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

    They added the "no experience necessary" clause so internal candidates can apply.