Slashdot Mirror


Comments About Comments

theodp writes "This weekend's NY Times is all-about-the-comments. First, Michael Erard recounts the history of Web site comments and explains how their technical origins have shaped the actual commentary we've come to expect as usual today. On dealing with people-behaving-badly, Erard writes, 'Only a few [high-traffic sites] seem to have tried user-moderation systems like the one developed by Slashdot's creator, Rob Malda. Founded in 1997, Slashdot rapidly began to suffer from what Malda called 'signal-to-noise-ratio problems' as tens of thousands of users showed up. Rather than embracing the chaos (which was a hallmark of Usenet, another digital channel of communications) or locking things down with moderators (which e-mail lists did), Malda figured out a way for users to moderate one another. Moderation became like jury duty, something you were called to do.' Next, NY Times community manager Bassey Etim, who oversees 13 comment moderators, offers up his comments on comments, agreeing that 'the comments are where the real America is.' Finally, there's Gawker's next-generation Kinja, which aims to further blur the lines between stories, blog entries, and comments."

4 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. The most valuable part of some sites by iampiti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's obvious that comments are what make some websites attractive. This is one of them.
    In Slashdot I usually find very interesting what other people think about the news. Sometimes, there're some jewels: Comments about people who really know what the news is about and offer their perspective. I same those comments as bookmarks. I wonder why there's not a "favorite" option to save them.

  2. Re:First post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Made even more appropriate by not actually being the first post.

    I never understood the desire to 'first post'. It's like saying "I've not a single useful thought in my head, and look how fast I can let everybody know it!"

  3. Re:The more moderated, the less honest by dugancent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More moderated = more groupthink.

    That is not a good thing.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  4. Re:The more moderated, the less honest by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However, without moderation, the noise often overtakes the signal and you're left without any discussion, debate, or sharing of useful information whatsoever. Also not a good thing.