Slashdot Mirror
Ordnance Survey Creates Minecraft Model of Great Britain
First time accepted submitter jeremyp writes "Ordnance Survey intern Joseph Braybrook has created a Minecraft World based upon accurate terrain mapping data of Great Britain. The world accurately represents the whole of Great Britain and surrounding islands (but excludes Northern Ireland and the Channel Islands). It maps 224,000 square kilometres of Great Britain and contains 22 billion blocks. Graham Dunlop (Ordnance Survey Innovation Lab Manager) says: 'We think we may have created the largest Minecraft world ever built based on real-world data.' The map can be downloaded from the Ordnance Survey."
around Manchester....
Can you give a glimpse at the process this requires? I assume it has to be algorithmic in some way but it's still baffling to me how it's done. What sort of errors happen?
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
how do you think they did this one? they had the data. now they have the map. there's only one reasonable way to do that.
if they did it by hand then you know where uk money is getting wasted that's for sure.
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
Are you suggesting that it wasn't done programmatically? In any event, I'd guess that the vertical size of the minecraft world would be a limiting factor.
Good luck doing an actual map of California, for example. :)
I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
Here's one of the whole Earth at a 1:1500 scale. I'd love to see them regenerate this with the biom updates they currently have in the snapshots.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnNbR_PIMJM
http://www.planetminecraft.com/project/the-recreation-of-the-earth-11500-scale/
~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
It's actually 50:1 scale
Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. ~ Douglas Adams
The astute would notice under "How we built it" they talk about how the did just that.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
- Charles Darwin
It's over 1 click, and it's time for your alarm bells to go past the point of ambiguity.
Da derp dee derp da teedly derpee derpee dum. Rated PG-13.
Someone needs to tell the BBS that Hogwarts is a real castle. They seem to think it's imaginary.
For those who might be interested, here is a link to the ordnance survey page where they describe the process used to create the map.
'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
That's impressive. I know how much of a pain it was to do just 12 x12 km of Halifax Regional Municipality
Meh.
I'll wait for the legos version.
Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
well I don't see what was that challenging either and the fact that it's not in scale diminishes it even further.. something that loads their data real time to have it in 1:1 scale and injects it into the game as the player walks around would have been nice and cool but this..
then again I don't even play the game. 3d construction kit wasn't that much fun back in the day(there's better modelling sw).
world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
We think we may have created the largest Minecraft world ever built based on real-world data.
Emphasis mine.
While extremely impressive, it's definitely not the largest based on data from another source. For instance, World of Warcraft's Azeroth has already been largely recreated to the tune of 68B blocks using a similar automated process. There are other projects to recreate Westeros and Middle Earth that are already well underway, though both appear to be being done by hand, so though they've had a lot of progress, I'd doubt they're into the billions of blocks placed.
Consider that the entire Kingdom can fit inside the state of Texas...
For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
Wow you're so hip I wonder how you see over your own pelvis.
What is it with sanctimonious twonks who have nothing better to do than belittle the passions of others?
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
We think we may have created the largest Minecraft world ever built based on real-world data.
Cue the "Google Earth" version in 3...2...
Koans and fables for the software engineer
Hmm...I never noticed I had a clone on slashdot.
Neat!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kw_d3d0XAo
Now which one of us is the original copy? We'll always be left guessing.
Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
Because it's unkind. Why not try contributing positively to the general well-being of the human race?
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Had they mentioned it I wouldn't have bothered reading the article, let alone download the map.
I have a map of the United States... Actual size. It says, "Scale: 1 mile = 1 mile." I spent last summer folding it. I also have a full-size map of the world. I hardly ever unroll it. People ask me where I live, and I say, "E6". -- Stephen Wright
They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
Shame the government has to waste money paying people to play Farmville,
Err, you do know the Ordnance Survey entirely funds itself from selling maps/map data, and gives a proportion of its profits to the Treasury?
Need to type accents and special characters in Windows? Use FrKeys
Yes, that's because texas is indeed moderately sizable. Why, it's almost the size of Alberta (6th largest Canadian province)
And this isn't how it should be. The Met Office and OS should give away their data to the country, and be funded by taxation.
The idea that a national surveying organisation should make profit is absurd.
Are you suggesting that it wasn't done programmatically?
Have you never been a summer work experience student?
Stick Men
True but
Canada Population 35 Million
Texas Population 26 Million
Great Britain Population 63 Million.
Population density also counts.
It is why china and India, once they get their populations up to speed will be the places to worry about.
on the flip side the same reason why they are so populaous will take them that much longer to get up to speed.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
Discouraging people from wasting hundreds of hours on a silly game - or maybe hundreds of millions of hours in total across all users - is far kinder to the human race than promoting that game.
Who are you to decide? Come to think of it, what are you doing wasting time on Slashdot when you could be out feeding the homeless or becoming a doctor? Get cracking on that cure for cancer, slacker!
It's just incidentally kinder, from a utilitarian perspective.
The same has been said of eugenics, among other things.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Not the two world war thing again? All that proved is your habitually late and needed the Russians to help you with that.
Have you ever one won a war against quality troops on your own?
You needed the French to beat the British and didn't even beat the Canadians.
Wow, such angry defensiveness.
"Stop disliking things I like!"
I'm not stopping you from playing your silly time-wasting game. I'm just telling you it's silly and time-wasting.
If you think that identifying a silly game as time-wasting is "misanthropic" then you have either led a very sheltered life or you have a playful love of hyperbole. If the latter, carry on; if the former, perhaps you should play Minecraft less and go out more at the weekends?
Who are you to decide?
Bla bla morality is relative everything is okay stop having an opinion different from mine.
what are you doing wasting time on Slashdot
I think I just established that I was, albeit incidentally, not wasting time. If I've discouraged someone from playing Minecraft, I've done a public service.
The same has been said of eugenics
Yeah ethical living is about weighing up different priorities. Encouraging people to stop playing Minecraft doesn't result in murder.
(Although if you had a better grasp of reality, you wouldn't be playing Minecraft, would you?)
Some of your former colonies might disagree.
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
Bla bla morality is relative everything is okay stop having an opinion different from mine.
You're welcome to have a different opinion from mine - it's assuming yours must be the correct one that makes you come off as sanctimonious. In my opinion.
I think I just established that I was, albeit incidentally, not wasting time. If I've discouraged someone from playing Minecraft, I've done a public service.
...in your opinion. And if you feel passionate enough about this that you'd like to encourage the world to play Minecraft a little less and go out and enjoy the world a little more, you could try to do so using reasoned argument rather than insulting your target audience.
Yeah ethical living is about weighing up different priorities. Encouraging people to stop playing Minecraft doesn't result in murder.
(Although if you had a better grasp of reality, you wouldn't be playing Minecraft, would you?)
I don't play Minecraft.
systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
Well of course I'm going to come into this assuming that my opinion is probably correct. If people always sat on the fence with everything, never daring to speak up lest they be considered sanctimonious, all sorts of horrible things would happen. I never said I'm not willing to reconsider my opinion, though.
As noted above, my words having a benefit is incidental, not primary.
Glad to hear you don't play Minecraft! Since you seem to have sustained a conversation more than 5 minutes, was about to positively review my opinion of the articulacy of fanatics, but I see it's not necessary now.
Whoosh
No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
I'm guessing they are using a flat projection, so claiming it's "accurate" is potentially questionable, depending on your definition of the word. Can any flat map be described as "accurate"? I guess it probably can, actually, as long as it is consistent and the projection is well defined. Just like a photograph or a painting of an object can be called "accurate" even though the object is actually three-dimensional.