Slashdot Mirror
New Zealand Converting Old Phone Booths Into National WiFi Network
An anonymous reader writes "What do you do with old public phone boxes hardly anyone uses? Convert them into a national network of WiFi hotspots is the answer in New Zealand. While others have converted their old phone booths into libraries, toilets, showers and even smoking booths, in New Zealand 700 hotspots will be live by 7 October with a target of 2000 by the middle of 2014. 1Gb of data will be free to customers of the incumbent operator, others have to pay for monthly access."
Last time I was in Hong Kong many of the phone booths were being used as APs for the phone companies pre-paid wifi network. Seemed like a great idea to make use of their even spread across the city.
They don't want their customers to have free wifi. They want their customers to have free wifi and everybody else passing every day by a 500kg reminder of them not being with the correct operator.
They pulled the doors off after a SCOTUS ruling showed that they were a private space with a legal expectation of privacy. Once the doors came off the communications were considered public and OK to record.
I do still miss the less trackable days of pagers and phone booths from a tinfoil hat point of view though.
Eircom in Ireland do this too, there's one outside the car park that I use when shopping in the town center, very convenient.
He can't just do it in the open. Everyone will see.
You're missing the point. These locations already exist, have leases, power, data, and a visual presence. Hopefully paid data will help subsidise these dinosaurs. I haven't used one in almost a decade; it was before I had a cell phone and wanted to call someone that did have a cell phone without my (then) wife knowing about it. Even then the phone didn't take coins, so I had to go into the adjoining dairy (convenience store) to buy card, which I never used up. I sympathise a bit - just a bit - with Telecom as in our neighbourhood these phone boxes are routinely etched or the glass smashed. I have no idea how they've been making money for the last few years.
They did set this network up as free to use for all in the Canterbury area after the quakes, which I thought was nice.
PROTIP: if your first thought on reading about a project is "that's so flagrantly impractical as to be absurd", it is possible that you have misread it.
No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
Because the system is already in place and the whole point of it is to just refurbish them into wifi hotspots. Plus, those phone booths could double as a anti-rape thing. Only that you have to lock the door real good if they still have locks and use your cellphone to call the cops.
I vacationed in New Zealand and I only saw 1 phone booth the whole time I was there, and that was in Arrowtown, preserved as part of a mining town. Sooo, not that useful, really, since there aren't any phone booths.
Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
If anyone's wondering, the tradeoff is that (while you're opted in) you get access to everyone else's home BTWifi hotspots and the commercial BTWifi network. It's just a rebranded FON system. You can actually log in to other FON and rebranded-but-FON-compliant networks too.
No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
I was one of those 175'000 customers who trialled it. And I have to say the speed was reasonable and you can't complain about free WiFi on the street. We were travelling NZ for 6 months and we used it all over the place. It tended to be the most reliable connection you could find, even better than sitting in a café and using their WiFi.
In spite of the summary, they aren't "converting" them to WiFi. They are adding WiFi nodes to each box. They will still be public phone booths.
[It seems to me, since phone booths are so rarely used, it would also make sense to convert them to free calls. I would imagine that the "income" from phone booths is vastly less than the cost of collecting money and maintaining the coin-feed systems (over and above the cost of maintaining the phone and booth itself.) This would provide a service to people who genuinely need it, increase utilisation with no added cost (calls over IP are virtually free), while reducing cost in net by eliminating collection.]
Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
Telecom's phone booths all take Visa, Mastercard, American Express - very few take cash now.
For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
I know it's not that phone box model but converting them into a fleet of TARDIS would be far better. They could deliver you data before it has been sent. That's being fast!
I always said the best way to protect an open WIFI connection from intrusion is rename it "BT Openzone"
Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.
NO UR WRONG DONT U SEE U MISREAD WOW NOT AS SMART AS ME OBV
I love trolls like this one. It's so beautiful to watch all the dorks smugly bite.
Although speaking personally, I could easily get by with just calling from public phone booths when on the move. It costs me more per call to use my mobile phone than it used to cost me (before they ramped up the prices) to make a quick call from a phone booth. (I have 5GB/mo Internet on a mobile dongle plan, but zero minutes, and although I can use VoIP, Skype for Android is so fucking awful it's not even funny. SIPgate's all right, however.)
Since you put this out there, I'm curious. Why didn't you want your wife to know? Planning a surprise party for her? Clandestine rendezvous? Buying something without approval?
I'm honestly curious...
Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
If and when you need a 300-kilogram metal box with a 200-kilogram concrete slab under it for setting up a WiFi hotspot, you're a pretty lousy engineer.
Are you suggesting that good engineers wouldn't make use of existing weather protected, mapped, and maintained infrastructure if it suits the purpose?
much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
Maybe it's not all about the box and more about the old phone lines in there. Not having to put down new wires has got to make setting up a network of hotspots much easier...
Meanwhile, in Sweden:
2007: Converting phone booths to hotspots: http://news.cision.com/teliasonera/r/sweden-s-telephone-booths-to-become-surfing-booths,c287332
2013: Telephone booths start to disappear, to be finished 2015: http://telekomidag.se/telefonkiosken-forsvinner-2015/
It is not profitable or useful to operate phone booths or hotspots when 3G is ubiquitous. In Sweden, we have internet access at any time, so there is no need at all for these artifacts. My bet is New Zealand will realise this soon enough.
No need to sympathize with Telecom. They are THE phone company in NZ, not just the payphone network. Telecom has most of the landline, mobile, and broadband business in NZ, and own the wires they lease to most of the other providers. So, they are not hurting over the demise of payphones.
The Telecom WiFi hotspots have been set up around NZ for a couple of years now. I guess it was a trial. Where I live in Nelson, there are at least two that I encounter often. They work, and they are free to everyone. I have used them several times when out shopping or getting a coffee. And I am not a Telecom customer.
In the USA, they were mostly just ripped out because they were increasingly just places to piss.
Is it a story if streetlights, hockey pucks, or whatever get converted to "wifi hotspots" so someone can make a buck? This just in: public statues converted to wifi hotspots (if you can afford them), public urinals converted to wifi hotspots (if you can afford them), your genitalia converted to ... really?
A cooler story: NZ government converts phone booths to free public wifi hotspots in effort ensure broader access to internet.
"Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
Verizon, an ISP in New York, NY, USA actually did this ten years ago, they were planning on a thousand wifi phone booths in Manhattan by the end of 2003. And they actually did it, I'm not sure how many were actually installed but I used them on several occasions, they worked just fine. And they dropped the whole thing not too long later. Maybe people weren't within range, maybe the technology wasn't up to it, I don't know.
They were already toilets, smoking booths, and even showers, if you didn't mind golden.
No brain, no pain.
This is about reusing existing infrastructure, not about a practical way to create something where there was nothing at all. Besides, how can you go wrong with a bit of extra space and security surrounding your equipment?
In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
New York tried this last year.
What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
And why not just tear them down entirely? that scrap metal surely is worth something ...
I dont remember seeing any phone booth here for ages -> all dismantled in the early 2000s
1 GigaBIT of bandwidth is not all that much. Sure, it's free and all, but it's less than 150MB.
Not the first by at least 10 years.
There was a BT phone box with WiFi near my school in 2003 (in a city in England). Source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3110726.stm -- which says they aimed to have 200 by the end of 2003.
I can use wifi only 90 percent of the time and just message someone from facebook.
The objection is not that it is impractical; if there are few phone booths then the project is eminently practical. The objection is that it is pointless. I do not have enough information to know if this is a valid objection either.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Only on Slashdot, where people value their privacy, does a question about someone's personal life get modded plus 2.
I was making living arrangements so I could leave my wife. I'll make no apologies as it turned out to be the single best choice I've made in my life in years. Anyone who's lived through a bad marriage could probably sympathise.
Your info is slightly out of date, as telecom hasn't owned or have had leasing rights to most of the infrastructure since ~2011. All they own now are their own NEAX's and DSLAM's in the exchanges or cabinets, and a few fibre lines. Of the services that they do lease out that I know is Unbundled bitstream access from the Cabinets or from exhanges where other providers don't have equipment set up. Currently, the majority of the infrastructure is owned and maintained by Chorus, which was split from telecom in 2011 as a result of unbundling in 2006.
I thank you for taking time to reply, and for your candor. Also, my sympathies on the reason for your exit - I hope all worked out well and that you're both in better places now!
Not sure if it's a character flaw or facet, but I'm immensely curious about people's lives, and when a glimmer of personal truth comes out, I latch on.
Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!