Slashdot Mirror


New Real Life Laser-Rifle Cuts Through Metal Like a Blowtorch

dryriver writes "We've seen real laser guns before pulling off tricks like starting small fires, or popping black balloons. That's cool, sure, but it's got nothing—on this handheld laser rifle. Developed by TWI this laser-cutter was initially designed for use by robots, but a few recent tweaks including a pistol-grip and a trigger made it into a human-sized rifle. It is designed specifically with nuclear decommission in mind, specifically chopping up huge pieces of metal infrastructure into bite-sized bits that are easily disposed of. And while it's definitely suited for that, it has some short-comings compared typical rifles. That range is pretty low, for instance, and it's not exactly mobile."

21 of 143 comments (clear)

  1. of course it isn't mobile by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    WE don't have high energy portable power sources.

    We really need to figure out an iron many style reactor to power the next generation of cool toys that we can dream but not really use.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:of course it isn't mobile by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      WE don't have high energy portable power sources.

      We really need to figure out an iron many style reactor to power the next generation of cool toys that we can dream but not really use.

      Also, it should be able to operate in frickin' saltwater. In fact, the frickin' buoyancy might even help with the frickin' portability.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re: of course it isn't mobile by pollarda · · Score: 4, Informative

      This isn't very impressive. If it isn't mobile, then it is like any other cutting solution. Of course, if you want to see something really impressive for cutting metals, Petrogen is the way to go. It is an oxy-gasoline cutting torch and can cut up to 14 inches of steel at once. Be sure to check out their videos. Super impressive.

    3. Re:of course it isn't mobile by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Jarvis and the reactor were the two most under-rated bits of tech Tony put together.

      The reactor would have ended war.

      But Jarvis... a real AI? That's far beyond anything else we've ever built.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:of course it isn't mobile by Subm · · Score: 5, Funny

      "You're going to need a bigger shark."

    5. Re: of course it isn't mobile by KiloByte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This isn't very impressive.

      What I find more impressive is that they somehow made a laser rifle. I wonder what does it do: shoot a helical beam like those in some games?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    6. Re: of course it isn't mobile by EdZ · · Score: 4, Funny

      With the scattering from the air blast, I propose "laser boomstick".

    7. Re: of course it isn't mobile by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't see any light...

      I would advise not to look at it with the other eye then.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:of course it isn't mobile by godrik · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, how much power does it need to operate? There must be some energy cost per time unit. But I could not figure it out.

  2. Pulse Rifle by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Phased-plasma pulse rifle in 40-watt range".

    If only...

  3. Safety at Work by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "designed specifically with nuclear decommission in mind, specifically chopping up huge pieces of metal infrastructure into bite-sized bits", which it vaporizes and then throws all over the operator (photo in TFA).

    Note to self: do not apply for that kind of work, no matter what the rate.

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
    1. Re:Safety at Work by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a trifle surprised that they'd be using some fancy laser apparatus in this situation:

      There are aspects of nuclear decommissioning (if memory serves, some lucky sucker got to deal with the 'eh, we don't know what this is, so we'll just weld it into barrels and leave it for the future' supply stored at Hanford, much of which was virulently radioactive, some, which one is always a surprise, also chemically unpleasant and/or explosive) where you can't get away with the heat, open flames, and vaporized-bits-getting everywhere that you see with lasers, various cutting torches, or high powered saws. For that sort of thing, you have somewhat exotic toys like liquid nitrogen cutting jets. If you are allowed to expose the sample to ridiculous temperatures and open flames, though, why expensive lasers rather than boring (and mature and relatively cheap) cutting torches or thermic lances?

    2. Re:Safety at Work by flimflammer · · Score: 3, Informative

      The robotic version was made for nuclear decommission. There is no operator in the vicinity in that situation. The video here is just demonstrating the same laser beam technology with a mounted pistol grip for manual use.

  4. more torch then rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it hard to call this a "laser rifle." Aside fromt he fact that rifles are rifles because of the rifling in the barrel (grooves which cause the bullet to spin), Rifles have a medium to long range. This appears to have only a slightly greater effective range then my Oxy-Fuel torch (which is to say, less then a foot).

  5. Re:handheld rifle by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, this article should have been titled "New Real Life Laser-Cutter Cuts Through Metal Like a Laser-Cutter"

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  6. And what is the advantage over a plasma cutter? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only one I can see is that it works from a couple inches away, and doesn't need an electrical ground return connection to the workpiece.

    Other than that, a plasma cutter is cheaper, less hazardous, and can cut thicker materials.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    1. Re:And what is the advantage over a plasma cutter? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sharks don't use plasma cutters.

      Just say'in.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  7. "End war"? by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The reactor would have ended war.

    Nonsense. People simply aren't that evolved. If we aren't fighting about energy we'll fight about something even more absurd like skin color or which imaginary invisible man in the sky we should all believe in.

    1. Re:"End war"? by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wanna start a real fight? Tell her that dress makes her butt look big. That will surely start WWIII.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:"End war"? by Kilo+Kilo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you meant to say "I like big butts and I cannot lie."

  8. That's an interesting definition of "rifle". by mpoulton · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently I already have a plasma rifle in my garage! It shoots plasma and cuts metal with it - and just like this laser rifle, it requires compressed air and a remote power supply connected by an umbilical. I also have a MOLTEN METAL WELDING RIFLE! Similarly, it requires a power supply and umbilical assembly. Strangely, none of my actual rifles need cables or power supplies attached to them in order to operate.

    --
    I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.