What about the first few seasons of the rebooted BSG? That was undoubtably an improvement on the original, took a vacuous but fun space opera into new territory as a dark and edgy SF psychodrama. "33" was one of the most sublime SF TV experiences that I've had in my life. Such a pity they ruined it towards the end... actually, that's unfair. They didn't ruin it, but it did drop dramatically in quallity.
They had many choices, simple two choices: Report bug and get $12.50, amazing yahoo was not giving them tree fidy.
They could have gone onto some darknets and sold the report for $100,000+. The choice was theirs to make.
Which is exactly why Yahoo should have paid them more. Make the choice less obvious and save themselves a lot of grief further down the line.
I've wondered something similar about this myself. In an accident, the driver of the vehicle is the one who usually is considered to be responsible for the vehicle. Is the company that manufactured the "driverless" system at fault, or is the primary occupant liable for legal repercussions? Surely the legal system will have to work out a few kinks before we see driverless cars in common use.
No, no, no. The blue meth is a mutagen similar to the Wild Card virus, and when Heisenberg tries it for the first time he happens to be watching Scarface and it triggers a transformation. It's a spectacular sequence with Walter White slowly morphing into an Al Pacino clone and calling people cock-a-roaches. Oh, I probably should've put a "Spoiler" tag on this post.
Yeah, but how much of the price is distribution costs? You have the costs of creating the content, costs of marketing the content, and costs of supplying the content. Physical media are expensive.
What about "Circle Shake"? Why does it keep getting mentioned as well? It was definitely tasteless but I can't see why it keeps getting mentioned in the same context of objectification.
Everyone seems to be focussing on "Titstare" which was admittedly juvenile, sexist and potentially offensive. It may just be me, but what's the problem with "Circle Shake". It was juvenile and potentially offensive, but was it sexist? It keeps getting mentioned in the same breath but I just don't see the comparison. One was objectifying women, the other was a joke about masturbation.
What happened is that apathetic voters simply put 1 into the first box on the page and dumped the paper into the Ballot box. They really didn't care who was in the box, they just voted to avoid being fined (yes, in Australia if you dont vote you get a fine).
I'm just glad one of the obviously racist parties (One Nation, Stable Population) wasn't in pole position.
You don't have to vote to avoid a fine, you only have to attend a polling place and get your name crossed off. There's no requirement for you to actually cast a ballot.
Slashdot Mirror
Psssstttt... be careful what you say, they're listening here too.
Governments should fear their people, not vice versa.
Nope, then the title would read: The Pentagon May "Retire" Yoda, Its 92-Year-Old Futurist
It's easy? EASY? Ever heard the saying "as cunning as a shit-house rat"? It wouldn't be easy.
Stealth technology merging with home design, lots of curved surfaces and irregular density walls in the ideal home of the future.
Why suppress and classify? Encourage everyone to have one in the home and have a backdoor installed. That would fit with the usual NSA modus operandi.
What about the first few seasons of the rebooted BSG? That was undoubtably an improvement on the original, took a vacuous but fun space opera into new territory as a dark and edgy SF psychodrama. "33" was one of the most sublime SF TV experiences that I've had in my life. Such a pity they ruined it towards the end... actually, that's unfair. They didn't ruin it, but it did drop dramatically in quallity.
Don't worry, ABC is reshowing them all on iView to celebrate the 50th anniversary. You can catch them anytime!
"Congratulations, we'll give you a service that lots of people offer for free,as long as you earn us money!" - Facebook
A V1, or a Scud.
Stop believing Onion articles, even if you want to believe.
They had many choices, simple two choices: Report bug and get $12.50, amazing yahoo was not giving them tree fidy. They could have gone onto some darknets and sold the report for $100,000+. The choice was theirs to make.
Which is exactly why Yahoo should have paid them more. Make the choice less obvious and save themselves a lot of grief further down the line.
"Phased-plasma pulse rifle in 40-watt range".
If only...
Sarcasm doesn't carry over the internet... Sarcasm doesn't carry over the internet... Sarcasm doesn't carry over the internet...
I really should repeat that to myself every time I comment on a /. article.
I wouldn't particularly worry unless it was signed by the NSA.
NSA tapped, but not Huawei tapped.
Economies of scale will drop the price, and then the major way to differentiate the product will be innovation.
I've wondered something similar about this myself. In an accident, the driver of the vehicle is the one who usually is considered to be responsible for the vehicle. Is the company that manufactured the "driverless" system at fault, or is the primary occupant liable for legal repercussions? Surely the legal system will have to work out a few kinks before we see driverless cars in common use.
No, no, no. The blue meth is a mutagen similar to the Wild Card virus, and when Heisenberg tries it for the first time he happens to be watching Scarface and it triggers a transformation. It's a spectacular sequence with Walter White slowly morphing into an Al Pacino clone and calling people cock-a-roaches. Oh, I probably should've put a "Spoiler" tag on this post.
Yeah, but how much of the price is distribution costs? You have the costs of creating the content, costs of marketing the content, and costs of supplying the content. Physical media are expensive.
It's ok, it's all good man.
What about "Circle Shake"? Why does it keep getting mentioned as well? It was definitely tasteless but I can't see why it keeps getting mentioned in the same context of objectification.
Everyone seems to be focussing on "Titstare" which was admittedly juvenile, sexist and potentially offensive. It may just be me, but what's the problem with "Circle Shake". It was juvenile and potentially offensive, but was it sexist? It keeps getting mentioned in the same breath but I just don't see the comparison. One was objectifying women, the other was a joke about masturbation.
What happened is that apathetic voters simply put 1 into the first box on the page and dumped the paper into the Ballot box. They really didn't care who was in the box, they just voted to avoid being fined (yes, in Australia if you dont vote you get a fine). I'm just glad one of the obviously racist parties (One Nation, Stable Population) wasn't in pole position.
You don't have to vote to avoid a fine, you only have to attend a polling place and get your name crossed off. There's no requirement for you to actually cast a ballot.
Below The Line is a great resource to remember next time around too.