Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Wins Legal Battle Against WoW Bot Company

New submitter gamersunited writes with news of Blizzard Entertainment's defeat of another company that created bot software to automate World of Warcraft characters. Ceiling Fan Software faces a judgment of $7 million, and must disable any active licenses for the software. They're also forbidden from transferring or open-sourcing the bot software, and from facilitating its continued use in any way. The court order (PDF) follows more than two years of legal wrangling. Blizzard won a similar judgment a few years ago against another bot company called MDY Industries, which created the popular Glider bot.

12 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. ALl you need to do by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is label it an aid for disabled players. Get ADA, Blizzard won't stand a chance.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  2. We beat them because the EU has no DMCA by Captain+Kirk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Blizzard sued my company in Germany and we are still trading. The reason is that Americans can't avoid the broad restrictions of the DMCA while Europeans are able to work within existing copyright and trademark law. The DMCA is simply a way of closing creative American companies so the business is done from overseas.

  3. Re:Bottable == boring IMO by kwiecmmm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the gameplay is so simplistic that its bottable, then it's pretty boring to me. Studies have shown NP-hard problems are more fun, because they benefit from our natural ability to quickly choose a good path even if it isn't the absolute best. These kinds of challenges are harder to write bots for. So stop make your games less mindlessly boring and it's a win win for everyone.

    As someone who used to play WoW. I can say that WoW, as most MMORPG's, has many difficult problems to solve in the game. Bots do simple mindless farming, they do not play every aspect of the game or compete against other players in PvP. I ran across a few bots while playing and I can say that they were easy to screw with. You could kill them or you could just kill what they were going to kill, and confuse the software a quite bit.

  4. Re:Bottable == boring IMO by MrBigInThePants · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is this insightful?

    Botting is almost exclusively used for currency/rep/etc farming. It has nothing to do with "gameplay". And whether you personally think WOW end game content is complex enough is irrelevant because botters cannot run end game raids or many other forms of content undermining your whole argument.

    And why do bots exist? Because "grinding" is the only way to gain large amounts of currency in a short amount of time. Gold farmers do it for cash. Players do it to shortcut themselves to the top and to avoid grinding.
    This small part of the game content IS simplistic and CAN be botted. It is a hurdle/challenge/time sink/test of your endurance to overcome to advance your character. I, like most, HATE grinding with a vengeance. But I NEVER played WOW for the grind, I played in spite of it.

    As a side note:

    I multibox WOW (5 chars) for the additional challenge. (and believe me it is a LOT more of a challenge) I would now never play another MMO without being able to multibox because they are all too easy.

    So I even agree with the idea of MMOs being way too easy to play - but still disagree with your post.

  5. Re:Bottable == boring IMO by dunezone · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To be fair most of these bots don't do much. Most bots won't go on quests, have conversations with actual people, go on raids, etc, etc. If they did fall into one of those areas the bot would quickly fail.

    If the gameplay is so simplistic that its bottable, then it's pretty boring to me.

    Ever played Fallout, Morrowind, or Skyrim on Xbox/PS3? You level up the sneak attribute by sneaking around which is basically crouching around and walking. People exploited this by putting rubber bands around the controller so the character would continuously crouch walk into a corner. That gameplay mechanic is pretty simplistic yet those games are amazing to play.

  6. Re:Can't open source it? by gigaherz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their game relies on an ever growing "grind" of repetitive and simplistic tasks to progress.

    No it does not. Repetitive simplistic tasks are one way of obtaining the resources (gold, experience, item tokens, ...), but they are far from being the primary way. In fact the only reason WoW is still as popular as it is, is because unlike almost every other MMO released since 2004, it is NOT a grindfest.

    Experience points come from quest chains in the open world and in instanced dungeons, and those quest chains have an actual story that unfolds as you play. Gold is obtained as reward from quests, and looted from monsters, same as gear. Item tokens are rewarded by defeating dungeon and raid bosses, which require a team, and a strategy.

    You can argue that it's too easy or boring for your tastes, but you can not say it is a grinding-based MMO.

  7. Re:Can't open source it? by Tassach · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So fix the (broken) gameplay mechanic that allows bot users to have an advantage.

    Having to 'grind' at mindless / meaningless tasks in game in order to play the interesting parts of the game is just bad game design - it disrespects the player's time and money. It's a transparent attempt to increase subscriber revenue. Get rid of the grind and you eliminate the incentive to use a bot in the first place.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  8. Re:Bottable == boring IMO by nospam007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " Gold farmers do it for cash."

    Exactly. And Gold farmers in China are not easily impressed by US law.

  9. Re: forbidden from transferring or open-sourcing? by Cramer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They don't want to ban users. It drives away paying customers.

  10. Re: Bottable == boring IMO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So... they're playing WoW?

  11. Re: forbidden from transferring or open-sourcing? by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Put it this way: Blizzard is an entertainment company. They have a lot of paying customers who play their game 'by the rules' and enjoy doing so. It is less entertaining for their players/customers if there are other people manipulating the game with automated functionality.

    If someone showed up at a bowling alley, entered in a tournament, and just ran down the lane and kicked over the pins, a bowling alley operator would be similarly justified in throwing them out.

    People who actually play WoW find bots annoying.

    If your form of enjoyment is hacking other people's games, why not show up at golf courses with All Terrain Vehicles? It's certainly more extreme. If you like cheating and coding, perhaps write a solitaire game that cheats for you.

  12. Re:Bad analogy is bad by Telvin_3d · · Score: 4, Informative

    I haven't read the TOS of WoW, but I doubt there is any clause that says anything like "by agreeing to this, you also give us rights to anything you create which might be related to the service we offer."

    I'm pretty sure it says precisely that. Or at least 'You agree to only interact with our software in approved ways". Which, for a multiplayer game, seems like a pretty reasonable restriction.