Slashdot Mirror


CryptoSeal Shuts Down Consumer VPN Service To Avoid Fighting NSA

sl4shd0rk writes "CryptoSeal Privacy, a VPN provider, has closed down its consumer VPN service. The company says it has zeroed its crypto keys, adding, 'Essentially, the service was created and operated under a certain understanding of current U.S. law, and that understanding may not currently be valid. As we are a US company and comply fully with U.S. law, but wish to protect the privacy of our users, it is impossible for us to continue offering the CryptoSeal Privacy consumer VPN product.' The announcement ends with a warning: 'For anyone operating a VPN, mail, or other communications provider in the U.S., we believe it would be prudent to evaluate whether a pen register order could be used to compel you to divulge SSL keys protecting message contents, and if so, to take appropriate action.' Sounds like another victim of FISA-endorsed NSA activity."

47 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentlemanly by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in the old spy days, the gentlemanly thing to do was crack the other guy's encryption, NOT beat his keys out of him. This is just cheating, pure and simple.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
  2. Time to start by ugen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand (or what do we have left that's not firmly in jurisdiction of governments with grubby hands and long noses)?

    1. Re:Time to start by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand (or what do we have left that's not firmly in jurisdiction of governments with grubby hands and long noses)?

      Perhaps your solution lies on a "pirate" data boat on the high seas?

      --
      Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    2. Re:Time to start by dmbasso · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will you let the Seamen manage your VPN? Be careful of backdoors!

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re:Time to start by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sounds like it's high time time to start a VPN provider in SeaLand

      This, though maybe not in SeaLand.

      The first country that offers verifiably secure email and VPN services to the world will enjoy an economic boom and the love of billions. And if it's a country like Iceland, it could go a long way toward making them wealthy. And if the US decides to invade Iceland, then at least the gloves can come off and the world can declare the United States a rogue state. But I don't see that happening, because at some point, if the rest of the world really starts to turn sour on the US, you'll start to see things change over here. But as long as we have to cover of the EU and Asia as our allies, the US spymasters can pretend that all is well. But with every week there's a new revelation about a president of a free country having their email hacked by the NSA, maybe we're closer to a worldwide shunning than we think.

      I'd gladly pay for secure email that I knew was beyond the reach of the upskirting creeps in the NSA. And I would love to be able to pay a place like Iceland, Finland, etc for that privilege.

      No one who values freedom, economic, social or just the freedom to not be watched, should be quiet about this. Me, I've become a one-issue voter thanks to the revelations about what the NSA is up to. Any legislator who voted against reining in those bastards is now on my list to support any opponent who will vote to put a stop to ubiquitous surveillance in the US.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Time to start by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What the hell? Why would I trust ANY country, or for that matter ANY third party with my encryption codes? I generate them myself, keep them to myself and never disclose them to the government or to any business.

    5. Re:Time to start by chihowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to move yourself and your contacts to a system incompatible with plain old email, why not just start using GPG (or even S/MIME)? Why choose a "solution" where you have no choice but to trust a third party (who you've never even met, in a foreign country, with opaque practices and facilities)?

      With GPG, nobody but you and your contact can decrypt the messages. If you add in a third party, they can now decrypt the messages too. You're adding points of failure this way, not making fewer of them! Why on earth would you even trust the provider? Why would you choose a system where you have to?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  3. Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are not going to have much advanced IT business left over there soon if this goes on.

    1. Re:Sorry... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are not going to have much advanced IT business left over there soon if this goes on.

      I think we are witnessing the (not very) slow disintegration of the principals and reality of the American Internet. Whether the internet itself will survive this is another matter.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Sorry... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We all knew this would happen. As soon as the government saw that the Internet was an opportunity and / or threat, they would work to get it under their control. Actually took them a bit longer than I expected, although the NSA-style snooping has likely gone on longer than we realize.

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Sorry... by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      Plenty to see here. Mainly, that businesses now have yet another reason to offshore.

    4. Re:Sorry... by Fjandr · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

    5. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't." - Doc Daneeka

    6. Re:Sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an outsider, I really don't freakin' understand how Americans are willing to ignore the most outrageous problems to defend their chosen party. Republican, Democrat, it doesn't make any sense. You can have someone who is a Democrat defending a baby slaughtering program(merely an example) for the sole reason that it isn't what the Republicans support. You guys are sooooooo weird! It's like your identity as a person revolves around which party you voted for.
      If one started the program and the other continues it - they're both at fault and both just as wrong.

    7. Re:Sorry... by wooferhound · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a secret warrant issued by a secret court, binding the recipient to secrecy under pain of imprisonment, and with no way to contest the warrant. And since it's the NSA, you can't even see evidence used against you because it's obviously in regards to national security...even if it isn't.

      Next thing to come will be the Secret Police . . .

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    8. Re:Sorry... by richlv · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most americans seem to be patriotic beyond reason. this might be caused by being taught from early on that they are morally, military and in any other way superior to any other country. later they keep those views and will defend _anything_ being done. it might be by weird reasoning, "they do it too" or other methods.

      it might help in some cases, but looks like long term it leads to an inability to criticise real problems and a decline.

      --
      Rich
  4. SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by lesincompetent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope that when american corporations start seeing their customers scared away by this 1984 crap they'll turn their lobbying powers to reverse the trend.
    Isn't this how politics work in the US, the country that legalized bribery?

    1. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jschrod · · Score: 5, Insightful
      For European companies, the NSA reading their data equals their competitors reading their data. This has been known here since at least the early 90s, when Echolon data was used for commercial advantage of US companies.

      Some European companies really don't care. But some do. That's why there was always a healthy mistrust in competetive European companies concerning their crucial data out of house, and why cloud computing has a slower uptake here than in the US. (Their unimportant data, they could care less about, even if it's personal data and against the EU privacy laws. That's life.)

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    2. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jschrod · · Score: 4, Informative
      You're lame. AC for real.

      It's even cited with references on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON#Examples_of_industrial_espionage

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

    3. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by ewibble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you are going to believe the former director of a spy agency?

    4. Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't speak of the bribery, I haven't done the leg-work to find out, but as for the rest...

      The general tone of the whole piece is that of someone who thinks the American way is superior and infallible and no other way can have merit, which makes me instantly suspicious of his bias. That he sits there and declares there is nothing worth stealing is a bit unlikely, unless you believe in US-superiority in all things.
      I question his judgement because he talks about Europe as if it's one entity. He talks about Europe like it has a single communist government, when its member states have a large range of political leanings.

      I suppose if your job is constantly looking outward at the threatening foreign lands then you're going to get a bit... tainted.

  5. DoS? by dex22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What is to stop the NSA doing a form of DoS attack on these types of services by demanding keys, and giving the services little option but to shut down?

    The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto pre-compromised services.

    1. Re:DoS? by LordLucless · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto overseas services.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:DoS? by Teckla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The effect of this is to remove secure competitors from the market and force users onto pre-compromised services.

      I know this is going to sound mighty odd, but hear me out...

      I kind of wish the NSA sold things like consumer routers, for which they wrote all the firmware, user interface, etc.

      The NSA employs Really Ridiculously Smart People, so then I could count on my router being really, really secure against everyone and everything... except the NSA.

      Which would be an OK trade-off for me, and I think would be an OK trade-off for a lot of people...

    3. Re:DoS? by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That will work until the US Congress passes a law similar to FATCA which compels foreign businesses to turn over financial records involving US persons. So far, few if any foreign countries have attempted to defend their sovereignty to protect Americans. I doubt much will change when it comes to data.

      It matters very little anyway. Because the 'big money' is in corporate accounts and corporate data. You and I, as individuals, can't wave a magic legal wand and move ourselves offshore. Corporations can. And that's who the people running offshore banks or data services cater to.

      What FATCA is achieving is that many non-US financial institutions are turning away customers who are US citizens; they won't have their money, don't want their custom. And many of these US citizens are giving up their US citizenship because of this. There are millions of US citizens around the world who are experiencing this financial blacklisting because of FATCA, especially in the EU.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    4. Re:DoS? by m.alessandrini · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In Italy we call that "mafia". That is, paying criminals against your will, to protect you from themselves and other bad guys.

  6. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've got technology businesses shutting down their services because they are now afraid of (i.e.: terrorized by) their own government?
    Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

    1. Re:Sad by adolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We've got technology businesses shutting down their services because they are now afraid of (i.e.: terrorized by) their own government?
      Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?

      The terrorists won as soon as we had to take off our shoes and throw away our nail files in order to get on an airplane, starting around 12 years ago.

      It's been an easy slide down the slippery slope since then.

    2. Re:Sad by adolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter if I still fly or not.

      One used to be able to board an airplane without a pat down, porno-scan, or a strip-search. One cannot do that now, because we've been terrorized into requiring these procedures.

      That's a win.

    3. Re:Sad by Urza9814 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It looks like they didn't shut down because of "terror" but because they didn't want to comply with court orders and didn't have the money to fight a losing battle.

      It doesn't matter what Congress or the courts say; if the law violates the US Constitution, it is illegal and invalid. Which makes the agents enforcing it part of an organized criminal enterprise. An organized criminal enterprise which has just caused numerous US businesses to close their doors by using tactics intended to produce a state of fear in those businesses. Sounds like the freakin' definition of terrorism to me.

    4. Re:Sad by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Did the terrorists actually win this war on terror?"

      Yes, but there were multiple winners.

      AQ inflicted trivial numbers of casualties compared to conventional wars, did that with minimal assets and personnel, and triggered/excused the US elites doing what they'd been working at anyway. The team damaged the US + world.

      The terrorists won by getting their adversary to make toxic structural changes, and the elites won by obtaining the excuse to make those changes! The American public and other Star Trek Red Shirts of the world lost. AQ and the Elites can both claim victory BUT also claim the battle is not over. Obvious to see where this will go...

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Sad by jareth-0205 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The terrorists won as soon as we had to take off our shoes and throw away our nail files in order to get on an airplane, starting around 12 years ago.

      Did that prevent you from getting on the plane? If not, then no.

      Your measure for loss-of-freedom is pretty high. I mean, let's say we got to a state where there is mandatory papers checks for every citizen on their daily commute. Does that stop them from going to work... probably not. Is it a loss, obviously yes.

    6. Re:Sad by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      its FEAR. that's what is at the heart of terrorism.

      and you are put in a state of fear and kept there by the TSA. if you make a joke, they can fuck with you, in a bad way. that's fear. if you have a name collision with someone who is on a no-fly, you are also put thru a world of hurt. that's fear.

      you don't dare question the air flight attendants. that's fear.

      you follow orders and don't fight back. that's fear.

      its all terrorism and its state sponsored. US states, that is.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  7. anyone anywhere by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For anyone operating a VPN mail or other communications in any country you should consider that your government can compel you to produce information.

    This intellectual exercise has been done a long time ago by those who looked a little deeper than you. It's why there were crazy ideas such as offshore data havens.

    In the end, you can't really do anything about it. The government your company is under (at the very least, maybe other entities too) can compel you. So now it's just a matter of which government you're least worried about.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  8. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  9. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by asmkm22 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The end result seems to be in line with general terrorism. Cause enough fear and confusion in your enemy until they change or give up.

  10. A different objective? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe the US Government's objective here is not collect data from these types of services like LavaBit, SilentCircle or whoever else has shuttered in fears (or actual) of being tapped by the NSA.

    It's starting to feel like to me the objective isn't the data, the objective is the services. This is denial of service. Denial of crypto services by the US Govt.

    I just can't really see why they would put the pressure on so blatantly. It's like they're sending a clear message to all of us, no more crypto services, we're going to find you and tap you so you're are ineffective, or shut down.

    1. Re:A different objective? by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a side to this.. at least it tells us something...

      they can't break the crypto.

  11. Donate Here to Protect SSL Keys by Heretic2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Donate to Lavabit legal fund

    The legal briefs filed so far look like they are about to hand the government its own ass in respect to seizing SSL keys.

  12. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Old spies were Sean Connery. New spies are Daniel Craig.

  13. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    http://xkcd.com/538/

    Only works if you actually know the password.

    Don't remember the password, use a token like a USB flash key. If they take the laptop without the key then it's useless, if you smash the key then it's also useless.

    No, this won't stop them from torturing you anyway, but on the other hand, they might pick up the wrong person who didn't actually own the laptop and torture them instead. This is the great thing about torture: it's only useful to confirm what you already know, not to extract anything new; there's no way to tell if someone is lying because you haven't broken them yet or lying because they don't know anything but really want the pain to stop.

  14. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This is just cheating, pure and simple."

    It is illegal, pure and simple.

    Since several crypto companies have in fact closed down, affecting thousands (at least) of people, we can come to some basic conclusions.

    First, we have proof that the NSA spying has had the effect of chilling otherwise legal, free speech.

    Second: we now have thousands of people who have provable legal standing to sue the government over it.

  15. there is no benefit to offset it by dutchwhizzman · · Score: 3

    You have lost, because there is no benefit whatsoever to doing all this. The terrorists still attack all over the place and all these measures taken "to guard against terrorism" have zero net results. Sure, some incidental victories have been made, but nothing structurally beneficial has been achieved. Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt have been controlling the USA and 99% of all the money and trouble they have been going through, have been wasted on chasing ghosts. It's time to stop this, accept the fact that some religious idiots will sometimes manage to kill a few people every now and then. Staying out of trouble has proven far more effective to over 90% of countries than the USA way of dealing with this, maybe the USA should try that approach for a while. It's a whole lot cheaper and it hardly can be less effective than the current policy.

    --
    I was promised a flying car. Where is my flying car?
  16. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by sconeu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First Lavabit.
    Then Groklaw.
    Now CryptoSeal.

    Who's next?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  17. Too late. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    #1 prison population in the world; and with a moderate population density too!

    #1 military, #1 spy system (by size) and both are actively used.

    Secret tapping of citizens phones,etc with a massive cover up (seriously, does anybody believe them after all that they did when they say "it's only meta data?") Almost more surveillance than a classic police state (it's just missing your neighbors turning against you.)

    Uncivilized prison system (many but not all; but the society is taught to believe and accept the known conditions. The system keeps the public from knowing about the horrible things... such as 12 year olds in adult prison with their rapist's name carved into their skin, for example.)

    Self exempted from most international laws. Pre-emptive wars, bribing, blackmailing corrupting foreign governments...(wikileaks put that stuff on paper) Killing or arresting or persecuting anybody on earth without respect for laws / jurisdictions (doesn't matter what you do, if you go to a safe nation the idea was you were safe when sovereignty was respected... not that it was all that highly regarded; but it's just openly dismissed today.)

    Police in most schools; more coming. Children arrested and processed as criminals for being children --in school; handcuffs on 8 year olds. Teens executed as adults. Adults executed... just like in China and Iran do. Teens tweeting being prosecuted for bullying outside of school...

    People generally afraid to express a wide range of "controversial" opinions not on the unofficial acceptability list. Obama a Muslim? that is ok. Telling on the bankers? nothing, if you harm them, jail time (but perhaps a big IRS reward...for afterwards...)

    Every police state has two systems-- one to go soft on the elite and one for everybody else. We have that situation too.

    Right to Peaceable Assemble? Result? Beat downs, false incrimination and nobody really cares; you'd think nobody ever reads past "free press" and that the other one "bear arms"... whatever, pass me a beer.

    Free speech and free press? Allowed but rendered nearly ineffectual which is why those are allowed.

  18. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by thexfile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No internet based company should be headquartered in the US.

  19. Re:This NSA crap is much too much, and ungentleman by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fighting against your own government/leaders who are enemies of your country, is not the same as fighting against your country. It's still fighting for your country.

    To me it is more patriotic than killing people in some other country.

    If more people around the world did that sort of thing there would be much less need to kill people of other countries.

    That said I'm not a big fan of patriotism. Seems to cause more harm than good.

    --