Slashdot Mirror


Israel Helped the NSA Spy on Former French President According To Documents

rtoz writes "It wasn't the US government breaking into the private communications of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy, according to top secret documents unearthed by Edward Snowden and published in Le Monde – it was the Israelis. A four-page internal précis regarding a visit to Washington by two top French intelligence officials denies the NSA or any US intelligence agency was behind the May 2012 attempted break-in – which sought to implant a monitoring device inside the Elysee Palace's communications system – but instead fingers the Israelis, albeit indirectly. A few days back, Le Monde reported that the NSA Intercepted French Telephone Calls 'On a Massive Scale' ."

215 comments

  1. Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, they paid on the "One day I will call upon you to do a service for me" variety plan, but here we are.

    It's too bad that system wasn't trained on the charlatans on Wall Street so their crimes could have been accounted for and punished. You know these guys are stupid enough to brag on the phone and via email about their crimes... All the hysterical email leaks from the last crisis prove that out pretty handily. These guys are so arrogant they think themselves "above the law" because they "figured it out."

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Funny

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock is #2: not to relate your statement to a conspiracy by banks(because stereotypes).

      #1 is not to deny the holocaust, but you didn't do that, so congratulations.

    2. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Right because Isreal is totally the innocent undertaker, who came to the Big Bad US looking for justice that he couldn't get through normal means :)

      If I was going to use a Godfather analogy I would go more for:

      If Don Corleone had all the judges, and the politicians in New York, then he must share them, or let us others use them. He must let us draw the water from the well. Certainly he can present a bill for such services; after all... we are not Communists."

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    3. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock

      One of the rules for thinking for yourself while not being a lemming are #2: realize that a man's hatred or love of a group of people has nothing to do with the factual truth of what is being said. #1 is to let racism or ethnocentrism be HIS problem and stop anointing yourself the arbiter of all that is righteous.

      Yes that takes a bit of humility and restraint and those are in short supply these days, for nothing is more fashionable than climbing on your high horse and telling other people how they should be and finding ways to justify it. A person who hates is polluting his own life and is causing misery to himself, no micromanagement from you is needed.

    4. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It's too bad that system wasn't trained on the charlatans on Wall Street so their crimes could have been accounted for and punished.

      Think about that for a second......

      It shouldn't be hard to understand now.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Pardon me but the ONLY rule for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-semite is... not criticizing Israel.

    6. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are LITERALLY hitler.

    7. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock...

      There is only one rule for that; preface every criticism of Israel with the following:

      "Don't get me wrong, I love Jon Stewart, but..."

      For example:

      Don't get me wrong, I love Jon Stewart, bit it seems to me the Israeli government uses Judaism as a weapon against their detractors, since nobody can say anything about Israel's bad behavior without being accused of anti-semitism.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    8. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pretty sure everyone is trying to control the banks and the media. You might as well try to argue that Jews are trying to control Physics. Many try. They succeed.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    9. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock is #2: not to relate your statement to a conspiracy by banks(because stereotypes).

      #1 is not to deny the holocaust, but you didn't do that, so congratulations.

      One of the rules for not being a sheep is not to let other people's prejudices get in the way of legitimate criticisms of Israel, Wall Street, or anybody else. The perception, that i was connecting the two, is a result of your prejudice, not mine. I made a suggestion for a better use of such spying authority--i.e. point it at actual criminals, not private citizens. You made the leap to some sort of "conspiracy" of Wall Street and Israel.

      So take yourself to task for being an anti-semite.

      --
      Who did what now?
    10. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not to say that Israel doesn't have problems of its own that are worth criticism, but it certainly doesn't deserve all the shit it gets.

      You can probably say that about any other country, too.

    11. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock...

      There is only one rule for that; preface every criticism of Israel with the following:

      "Don't get me wrong, I love Jon Stewart, but..."

      For example:

      Don't get me wrong, I love Jon Stewart, bit it seems to me the Israeli government uses Judaism as a weapon against their detractors, since nobody can say anything about Israel's bad behavior without being accused of anti-semitism.

      This times a million: Distract from the actual legitimate criticism of the NSA (that it would have been better used to track down wall street swine who committing multiple felonies and should have been liable for thousands of years of prison time) by accusing the speaker of an invented anti-semitism.

      Congratulations: Goebbels would be proud.

      --
      Who did what now?
    12. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rule #1 for not looking anti-Semitic is to know what a semite is, take a look:
      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/semite
      You see, Arabs are also semites, so Israel looks quite anti-Semitic if you take that on account.

    13. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by TapeCutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's too bad that system wasn't trained on the charlatans on Wall Street

      Um, hello? The Snowden revelations are almost exclusively about "economic espionage", the headlines are about who's phones were tapped and which boardrooms were bugged. "Wall street" are the people who want this data and the MI complex are delivering it to them on a silver platter. Why the fuck would they want to point a gun at their own head?

      There is no conspiracy, just like minded people playing golf and screwing everyone they can, including each other, this sort of spying has been going on forever and it's not going away. Having said that and given the history of the 20th century, you would have to be a fool to be unconcerned when the NSA appear before congress and either lie or refuse to answer questions, then walk away with their career intact. That is a clear sign the MI complex is telling congress to go fuck itself (in polite political language). Whatever the pro/cons of the argument, the current belligerence of these people is a threat to the rule of law and a wedge that will polarise international relations..

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    14. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, nobody has been able to change the laws of physics. The laws governing money and finance, however...

    15. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the rules for thinking for yourself while not being a lemming are #2: realize that a man's hatred or love of a group of people has nothing to do with the factual truth of what is being said. #1 is to let racism or ethnocentrism be HIS problem and stop anointing yourself the arbiter of all that is righteous.

      That's cute and all, except European antisemitism is as endemic and as ingrained in their culture as racism is in America. It's a cultural no-no, but it's often still the guttural reaction of choice. And criticizing Israel is the natural outlet for this reaction. That is not to say that Israel doesn't have problems of its own that are worth criticism, but it certainly doesn't deserve all the shit it gets.

      Nonsense. Criticism of Israel is not evidence of anti-semitism--period. If somebody criticizes Israel by saying "all Jews should drop dead" that's not "criticizing Israel," that's racism. A reasoned set of criticisms not based on the race or religion of Israelis (i.e. you can safely ignore as racism anything that attempts to use the word "Jew" as a pejorative,) is not "anti-semitism."

      I didn't imply any such thing in my OP, you inferred the lot of it.

      --
      Who did what now?
    16. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a perfect example of how ideology clouds peoples' judgment and prevents us from rationally discussing the issue at hand, instead producing knee-jerk reactions such as "Israel = Satan", "Israel = Saints", etc.

    17. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pardon me but the ONLY rule for criticizing Israel while not getting branded an anti-semite is... not criticizing Israel.

      Fixed that for you. And I'm serious - this isn't about actual antisemitism, it's about suppression of criticism by claiming racism.

    18. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #1 is not to deny the holocaust

      Nobody should flat-out deny the Holocaust. Large parts of it are actually true.

    19. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to Google, I'm no longer certain if you mean LITERALLY-LITERALLY or LITERALLY-FIGURATIVELY Hitler.

      'You are FIGURATIVELY Hitler' just doesn't have the same punch to it.

    20. Re: Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Remind me...why are they so easily offended?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    21. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      Right because Isreal is totally the innocent undertaker, who came to the Big Bad US looking for justice that he couldn't get through normal means :)

      If I was going to use a Godfather analogy I would go more for:

      If Don Corleone had all the judges, and the politicians in New York, then he must share them, or let us others use them. He must let us draw the water from the well. Certainly he can present a bill for such services; after all... we are not Communists."

      I never viewed the undertaker as "innocent," not in the least. I'm surprised to hear you say you did: He was a coward who wanted violence done without having to risk committing it himself--but I don't think that makes him "innocent," not in the least. He contracted for retribution from a murderous mob-boss.

      --
      Who did what now?
    22. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock is...

      Why would you think this is one of his concerns?

    23. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by causality · · Score: 1

      Pardon me but the ONLY rule for criticizing Israel while not getting branded an anti-semite is... not criticizing Israel.

      Fixed that for you. And I'm serious - this isn't about actual antisemitism, it's about suppression of criticism by claiming racism.

      It's standard fare in politics sadly. If you want immigration laws (even just existing ones on the books) to be enforced, you're racist against Mexicans (an accusation made by people who have never reviewed Mexico's much stricter immigration laws!). If you criticize Israel, you're an anti-Semite. If you're against President Obama's politics or Eric Holder's actions, you're racist against black people. Etc etc. I wonder what such people would say if we ever developed a real problem with millions of white Canadians illegally entering the country, but I digress.

      It's a cheap way to shut down all reasonable discussion and put the other person immediately on the defensive, trying to disprove a negative. It comes from people who don't want reason and logic to enter into the discussion because these are threats to their position, a position based on self-interest and not based on what makes good policy or which view is closest to the truth.

      A side-effect I consider intentional is that the obsession with group identity is a direct assault on the concept of individuality. Real individuality is a strong threat to the main method of politics today, which is to divide people into multiple groups and gain power by promising to protect each from the others.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    24. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by causality · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that Congress doesn't grow a pair of balls and press criminal charges against the liars.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    25. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... it seems to me the Israeli government uses Judaism as a weapon against their detractors, since nobody can say anything about Israel's bad behavior without being accused of anti-semitism.

      Many people use anti-Zionism against Israel as a cloak for anti-Semitism.

      The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    26. Re: Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Remind me...why are they so easily offended?

      *shrug* try asking them.

      Were I to wager a guess, I'd say they don't actually have as thin of skin as they portend to*, but as I said before, pull the race card at every given opportunity because it's handy and convenient - nobody** wants to be thought of as an anti-semite, do they?

      * I of course refer to the Israeli gov't when I say this; I've known some Israeli people in my day, and they were just like the people I've met from any other culture: interestingly varied.

      ** Excluding obvious, overtly anti-semetic groups.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    27. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you know much about Europe. Antisemitism in Europe is not endemic nor culturally ingrained. It was a hundred years ago, but now it is only anecdotal in European culture. Events like l'affaire Dreyfus slowly killed cultural antisemitism. Now, because of WW2, being antisemitic in Europe is associated with being fascist... and the witch hunt against fascism is still on. Do not confuse a more neutral attitude toward Israel as antisemitism.

      The only ones in Europe who are clearly against Jewish people are Muslim immigrants. Which bring me to another point... The real hatred in Europe is against Muslims (in my opinion, this hatred is somewhat justified, but that's another question).

    28. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      "It comes from people who don't want reason and logic to enter into the discussion because these are threats to their position, a position based on self-interest and not based on what makes good policy or which view is closest to the truth. "

      +1. Trying to steer towards a hidden agenda while making you look like Mother Teresa.

      I suggest pick up the book "The Holocaust Industry" by Norman Finkelstein.

    29. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel paid for their french nukes by spying on France?

      The Israeli military program started and probably reached actual weapons before Israel and the USA had the "special relationship" they have today. Back then, France was the closest ally of Israel, they also shared nuclear technology with Israel and even built the (research) reactor in Soreq for Israel in 57.

    30. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest pick up the book "The Holocaust Industry" by Norman Finkelstein.

      He's an antisemite, and so are you for recommending his book.
      Anyone who thinks this post is funny is an antisemite, too.
      All others as well.

    31. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0

      I know what a Semitic person is, but "antisemitic" is a term with a clearly understood cultural meaning. Languages evolve. Get over it.

    32. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      He contracted retribution because the so-called justice system failed him. Those cock suckers walked free from court the same day, they even smiled at him. They got off after beating his daughter for resisting their attempt to rape her.

      I find no fault at all with him.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    33. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No, it's not evidence of antisemitism, but antisemitism frequently leads to it. There are racists. They do hate Israel just because it's officially Jewish. Those people make it actively harder to criticize a country that is presently engaged in ethnic cleansing.

    34. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      He contracted retribution because the so-called justice system failed him. Those cock suckers walked free from court the same day, they even smiled at him. They got off after beating his daughter for resisting their attempt to rape her.

      I find no fault at all with him.

      "I don't blame him" and "innocent" are two different things.

      I'm not saying I might not have pursued similar course of action in the same circumstances, but he was clearly far from innocent. How would he be connected enough to the mob to ask such a favor in the first place? You don't just "show-up" uninvited at the Don's daughter's wedding...

      --
      Who did what now?
    35. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      ... it seems to me the Israeli government uses Judaism as a weapon against their detractors, since nobody can say anything about Israel's bad behavior without being accused of anti-semitism.

      Many people use anti-Zionism against Israel as a cloak for anti-Semitism.

      The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews

      Yes, but it's also true that many people who claim that anti-Zionism is a cloak for anti-Semitism use it as a club to bash Israel's detractors, regardless of the legitimacy of the complaints.

      Basically, there are bad actors on both sides of the fence. Point being, just because someone points out the bad behavior of the Israeli government does not make them defacto anti-Semites.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    36. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Edward Teller openly admitted to traveling to Israel and teaching them how to refine plutonium and build a hydrogen bomb. He briefed the CIA on this after the fact.

      It's basically the same thing as Fuchs giving away the designs to the Soviet Union, only Fuchs ended up going to prison whereas Teller got to design the SDI satellites and retire in comfort. But hey, Cold War realpolitik was weird like that.

    37. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

      Norman Finkelstein is Jewish.

      You are proving the point that any criticism regarding Israel gets you branded as anti-semite, regardless of origin or content.

    38. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Where did he mention the banks? All he said was they should've spied on Wall Street to get evidence for convictions; presumably for the largest financial scandal in US history. You basically back up the fallacy that criticizing Israel will be turned into an antisemitic rant.

      He made no mention or illusion of evil Jewish people running our banks, or whatever that conspiracy is.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    39. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by N1AK · · Score: 5, Informative

      Israel deserves all the shit it gets and more, not because they are Jewish but because what they are doing shouldn't be tolerated from any country.

      Find me a western country with half as much anti-Jewish sentiment as there is anti-Islamic sentiment in Israel and I'd happily ignore their opinion on the matter.

      What I don't understand is why it can be stated, without being blanket refuted, that Israel is hated because Jews live there. Hell, if anything, I would think that the correlation is the other way. The actions of Israel may be fuelling hatred or at least dislike of Jews in some cases because people see what Israel does and make the false assumption that as Israelis are mostly Jews the actions of Israel are representative of Jews.

    40. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      I guess my benefit of the doubt doesn't extend quite as far as yours.

    41. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of those rules for criticizing Israel while not seeming like an anti-Semitic cock is #2: not to relate your statement to a conspiracy by banks(because stereotypes).

      #1 is not to deny the holocaust, but you didn't do that, so congratulations.

      Maybe YOU'RE the bigoted fuck since you were the one who specifically brought up stereotypes of Jewish bankers. Ever think of that?

    42. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by sageres · · Score: 0

      Norman Finkelstein is a Jewish Antisemite. A useful idiot at best, a self-hating Jew at worst.

    43. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, you can't be too vigilant these days. There is an antisemite behind every corner.

    44. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Semites are not a "race", nor is "Judaism" a race.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jews

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    45. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Knowing and watching for a stereotype is not the same as embracing it. You damn well know your logic is flawed.

    46. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly do they do? Defend against terrorist atacks perpetrated by arabs/muslims?

    47. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by TTL0 · · Score: 1

      The Don's wife was Godmother to his only child and the Don mentions that they have known each other for many years.

      Hardly a stranger who just crashed the wedding...

      --
      Sanity is the trademark of a weak mind. -- Mark Harrold
    48. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Distract from the actual legitimate criticism of the NSA (that it would have been better used to track down wall street swine who committing multiple felonies and should have been liable for thousands of years of prison time)

      Note that the NSA's legal mandate is EXTERNAL signals intelligence.

      Sending the NSA to investigate Wall Street is as illegal as, well, having them monitor Americans' cell phone conversations.

      If you want to go after Wall Street, use the Justice Department and the FBI.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    49. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      The rule is simple: stop applying double standards to Israel. Don't expect her to live by standards that your own country doesn't live up to. Don't criticize her for mistakes any more than you already criticize other countries for those same mistakes. Apply equal standards and it will be genuine.

    50. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't deny the holocaust. But I will say too bad they didn't finish the job.

    51. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Neither is "black", but I'd still be classed as racist if I used a persons colour in a negative manner.

    52. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      The rule is simple: stop applying double standards to Israel.

      The only double standard I've seen in Israel's case is the one where they feel they can rattle sabers at their neighbors day-in and day-out, but the minute one of those neighbors so much as builds a single 5% enrichment facility, which has no purpose other than civil power generation, Israel seems to think that's crossing some sort of line and said neighbor needs to be wiped out in a nuclear holocaust.

      That said (and forgetting, for a moment, that living in a place does not mean you automatically agree with everything that places government does), I'll go ahead and take your bait:

      Don't expect her to live by standards that your own country doesn't live up to.

      OK; my country readily admits to its nuclear capability, and is a signator of the NNPT.

      Your move, Israel.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    53. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "That's cute and all, except European antisemitism is as endemic and as ingrained in their culture as racism is in America."

      I've lived in Europe all my life and never seen any evidence of this. The closest thing I've seen is South park and people making Cartman parody anti-semitic comments based on that.

      There are anti-semites here, but I see far more hatred between Europeans simply for being from different parts of Europe than I do any anti-semitism - people from Eastern European nations get far more of a hard time in Western Europe when they emigrate there after each EU expansion for example, the unfair attitude towards Polish people being an obvious one that comes to mind. I'd wager the Jews are a group that suffers much less prejudice than most, especially compared to various gypsy groups, or many of the African immigrant groups such as Somalians, or groups of people from countries new into the EU. Muslims are another obvious example of people who suffer far more prejudice in Europe than Jewish people do.

      What Europe does speak out about much more than the US however is Israeli aggression in the middle east and illegal annexing of territory that is not Israel's, but hopefully you're not confusing that for anti-semitism.

    54. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the anti-Islamic sentiment in Israel is bad, then you obviously haven't tried wearing traditional Muslim clothing in France any time recently.
      And most of Europe has been treating the Roma like shit for as long as history has bothered to care.

      The point is that racism and cultural elitism is far more rampant in most European nations than they will admit, and while it's true we have our own problems in the US we at least own up to it.

    55. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      The rule is simple: stop applying double standards to Israel.

      The only double standard I've seen in Israel's case is the one where they feel they can rattle sabers at their neighbors day-in and day-out, but the minute one of those neighbors so much as builds a single 5% enrichment facility, which has no purpose other than civil power generation, Israel seems to think that's crossing some sort of line and said neighbor needs to be wiped out in a nuclear holocaust.

      Both the IAEA and Iran itself admit to 20% enrichment, the existence of a heavy water facility and the development of ICBM. None of these are needed for civilian use, nor does Iran (a country with enough oil to meet domestic demand for over 100 years) need nuclear energy in the first place.

      Don't expect her to live by standards that your own country doesn't live up to.

      OK; my country readily admits to its nuclear capability, and is a signator of the NNPT.

      Your move, Israel.

      What's your point? The US has openly tested and used nuclear weapons. Israel has not.

      You seem to be implying that Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel never said it does. They have no requirement (whether legal or moral) to join the NPT. They have repeatedly stated that they would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the middle east and would be willing to sign the NPT once the region cools down (peace treaties are signed with the remaining Arab neighbors).

      Furthermore, the US is not in the same situation as Israel. If Mexico was launching missiles and sending terrorists across your borders daily I daresay you would have bombed them back into the stone age. Israel has the capability to do so, yet has not. My point is simple: don't compare the situation of the US (with neighbors such as Canada and Mexico) to Israel. If Israel was located between those two countries then we could talk.

    56. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Arker · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      However the other gentleman has already replied with a good counterpoint. The fact is that there is only one human race currently living, so strictly speaking 'racism' - if by that you mean discrimination against those of another race - is impossible. We would have to first fine a way to resurrect a neanderthal, THEN we could discriminate against him.

      But in fact racism is real and rampant, but racism is not discriminating by race, it's more subtle than that. It's *the delusion that multiple races of humans exist* that is the root of real racism - and discrimination just forms the icing on that particular cake of mental illness.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    57. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      Many people use anti-Zionism against Israel as a cloak for anti-Semitism.

      The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews

      Do you agree they are separate things though? Would you say it is possible to be opposed to Israel's treatment of the Palestinians and illegal annexation of land, because of the facts rather than their Jewishness? Because otherwise you're just saying "all criticism of Israel is actually anti semitic", period (let's put aside the fact that Palestinians are Semites also).

      I tend to think that true anti Semites, of which there are a few but not nearly as many as Abe Foxman would have you believe, don't bother with cloaks. Conversely most critics of Israel who refrain from slurs probably, in my estimation, don't secretly hate Jews for being Jews.

      There's a documentary you might find interesting, link, on the subject of how charges of anti semitism are used as rhetoric device.

      With any luck I'll find time to read the linked article. NYT isn't actually known for fairness on this topic though, for instance it's been decades since they had a reporter there who even spoke Arabic. It's difficult to accurately report both sides of a conflict when you rely on one party to supply translators when interacting with the other.

      But then again, that has been said of US mainstream media generally.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    58. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be implying that Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel never said it does. They have no requirement (whether legal or moral) to join the NPT. They have repeatedly stated that they would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the middle east and would be willing to sign the NPT once the region cools down (peace treaties are signed with the remaining Arab neighbors)

      Are you kidding? Olmert basically admitted as much a couple years ago. Remember this guy Vanunu? Pretty conclusive evidence was presented. Then there was this awkward situation of helping the South African apartheid regime's nuclear ambitions.

      No one with half a brain doubts Israel has nukes.

    59. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      The thing is their logic is not flawed, it is just they are feeling insecure. If your culture and ethnicity are so positive to the society, taking in a couple of stereotypes wouldn't hurt. We Chinese-American people takes in thousands of stereotypes, Confucian values taught us that not to retaliate or respond. We don't have ADL, NAACP or similar organizations to defend ourselves.

    60. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying that Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel never said it does.

      Neither has Iran; in fact, they've outright denied it.

      So the question becomes, why should the IAEA believe Israel and not Iran? If Iran has to let UN inspectors check out their stuff, shouldn't logic dictate that Israel should as well? You know, to make sure they're on the up-and-up.

       

      They have no requirement (whether legal or moral) to join the NPT. They have repeatedly stated that they would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the middle east and would be willing to sign the NPT once the region cools down (peace treaties are signed with the remaining Arab neighbors).

      So? I can say 'my name is Mary, Queen of Scots" all day long; doesn't make it fact. That's what the petticoats and tinfoil crown are for.

      Furthermore, the US is not in the same situation as Israel. If Mexico was launching missiles and sending terrorists across your borders daily I daresay you would have bombed them back into the stone age.

      [citation desperately needed]

      Funny, because when I read the news, I see all sorts of stories about the Israeli military performing strikes in Turkey, Egypt, etc., but not once in the past several years have I heard about any nation's regular army invading Israel.

      You can make excuses and defer blame 'til the cows come home, but history shows us the truth.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    61. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying that Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel never said it does.

      Neither has Iran; in fact, they've outright denied it.

      So the question becomes, why should the IAEA believe Israel and not Iran? If Iran has to let UN inspectors check out their stuff, shouldn't logic dictate that Israel should as well? You know, to make sure they're on the up-and-up.

       

      You seem to be confusing facts. The IAEA has independently confirmed that Iran is enriching nuclear material to 20% level, and has developed a heavy water reactor. And again, IRAN HAS SAID SO ITSELF. None of this evidence depends on anything Israel has said.

      They have no requirement (whether legal or moral) to join the NPT. They have repeatedly stated that they would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the middle east and would be willing to sign the NPT once the region cools down (peace treaties are signed with the remaining Arab neighbors).

      So? I can say 'my name is Mary, Queen of Scots" all day long; doesn't make it fact. That's what the petticoats and tinfoil crown are for.

      I fail to see your point. The fact of the matter is, Iran signed the NPT and then proceeded to violate its terms. Israel has not signed the NPT and as such has not violated any terms. The NPT is nothing more than a legal document.

      Furthermore, the US is not in the same situation as Israel. If Mexico was launching missiles and sending terrorists across your borders daily I daresay you would have bombed them back into the stone age.

      [citation desperately needed]

      Funny, because when I read the news, I see all sorts of stories about the Israeli military performing strikes in Turkey, Egypt, etc., but not once in the past several years have I heard about any nation's regular army invading Israel.

      You can make excuses and defer blame 'til the cows come home, but history shows us the truth.

      Citation needed, indeed. I'd like to know how many times Israel has struck targets inside Turkey and Egypt in the past decade. Please, provide reliable citations.

    62. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want to see real racism? Go to Israel. They even discriminate between Jews based on skin color.

    63. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and to protect against that theoretical threat they commit genocide...

    64. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by dadelbunts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. I fucking hate Israel and anyone who supports it. Not because they are Jews, because they are a bunch of terrorists that refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Because they take land that isnt their by force then act surprised when the people that live there fight back. Because they are a constant source of problems for all their neighbors which they attack for no reason.

      Also it amazes me how anti american they are. When i was working defense contracting i must have called over 300 places in Israel. EVERYONE there was rude as hell. Rudest people i have ever encountered. I had an easier time finding carpenters in Iraq, during a war, with me not speaking a word of arabic.

    65. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Roma are shit. And speaking as someone that has worn Islamic clothing in Europe, the only time I got stopped was when I was early for a meeting and waiting around outside, without realising that I was also outside the Israeli embassy next door.

    66. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Zemran · · Score: 1

      But if he is literally Hitler, then he is dead and still writing on /., and no one noticed...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    67. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying that Israel has nuclear weapons. Israel never said it does.

      Neither has Iran; in fact, they've outright denied it.

      So the question becomes, why should the IAEA believe Israel and not Iran? If Iran has to let UN inspectors check out their stuff, shouldn't logic dictate that Israel should as well? You know, to make sure they're on the up-and-up.

       

      You seem to be confusing facts. The IAEA has independently confirmed that Iran is enriching nuclear material to 20% level, and has developed a heavy water reactor. And again, IRAN HAS SAID SO ITSELF. None of this evidence depends on anything Israel has said.

      So, double standard is OK because, according to you, Iran admits to enriching uranium and Israel lies about it. Yea, that makes sense.

      They have no requirement (whether legal or moral) to join the NPT. They have repeatedly stated that they would not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons into the middle east and would be willing to sign the NPT once the region cools down (peace treaties are signed with the remaining Arab neighbors).

      So? I can say 'my name is Mary, Queen of Scots" all day long; doesn't make it fact. That's what the petticoats and tinfoil crown are for.

      I fail to see your point.

      Somehow I'm not surprised. You seem to be an apologist who cares more for what the Israeli government claims than the reality evidence presents.

      FWIW, my point is plainly obvious - what one says one does, and what one actually does are not necessarily the same thing.

      Put simply enough for anyone to understand, liars exist. Even in Israel.

      See the point yet? If not, I know I've got some crayons and construction paper around here somewhere...

      Furthermore, the US is not in the same situation as Israel. If Mexico was launching missiles and sending terrorists across your borders daily I daresay you would have bombed them back into the stone age.

      [citation desperately needed]

      Funny, because when I read the news, I see all sorts of stories about the Israeli military performing strikes in Turkey, Egypt, etc., but not once in the past several years have I heard about any nation's regular army invading Israel.

      You can make excuses and defer blame 'til the cows come home, but history shows us the truth.

      Citation needed, indeed. I'd like to know how many times Israel has struck targets inside Turkey and Egypt in the past decade. Please, provide reliable citations.

      Tell you what: you made the first dubious, unsubstantiated claim, so why don't you cite a source for your claims that Israel is constantly being invaded by their neighbors. Afterward, I'll gladly provide links to the syndicated news articles proving my own claims.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    68. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denying the holocaust means absolutely nothing to anybody else than the victims. A real anti-Semitic cock would embrace the fact that holocaust happened and flaunt its feathers as it annoys the shit out of people living around it in the mornings. Why would such a colorful bird deny the existence of something that caused harm to the people it hates? Every cock should defy their flock by expressing their true feelings and becoming the pagan bird that they really are just for the emotional clarity.

    69. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

      So, double standard is OK because, according to you, Iran admits to enriching uranium and Israel lies about it. Yea, that makes sense.

      Says you. Last time I checked, personal opinion does not count as a verifiable fact.

    70. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they didn't sign the NPT. India didn't sign the NPT either, and yet I see very little shit thrown at them for the same entirely reasonable decision.

      The NPT essentially boils down to "These five nations get to have nuclear weapons, and the rest of you don't. Anyone who didn't detonate their first nuclear bomb before 1968 is hereby a second-class nation, forever." It's a bullshit double standard and always has been.

    71. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The two groups showing the most anti-semitism at the moment are in fact the Arab nations and the Israeli State . How much of that reflects the people of either group I do not know

    72. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Found the one part you think you can argue with and ignore the rest, eh? Classy.

      So, double standard is OK because, according to you, Iran admits to enriching uranium and Israel lies about it. Yea, that makes sense.

      Says you. Last time I checked, personal opinion does not count as a verifiable fact.

      That street runs 2 ways, Captain "Makes Dubious Claims, and When Asked for Citation Tries to Weasel Out by Demanding You Provide Citation for Counter Claims."

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    73. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Ah, I think that was supposed to be sarcasm, poorly executed though it may be.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    74. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And does Europe criticize Turkey for its aggression in the middle east and illegal annexing of territory this is not Turkish?

      And does Europe criticize Morroco for its aggression in Africa and illegal annexing of territory this is not Morrocan?

      And does Europe criticize China for its aggression in Asia and illegal annexing of territory this is not Chinese?

      And does Europe criticize France for its aggression in the pacific and illegal annexing of territory this is not French?

      I believe the answer to those questions is 'No!!". So that might explain why Americans tend to think that Europeans are a bunch of anti-Semtes.
      You clowns can't even defend yourselves without massive American aid. Fix your own fouled nest before criticizing others.

    75. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      European antisemitism is as endemic and as ingrained in their culture as racism is in America.

      There is Jew hatred here in Europe. I assume you are aware how often the media usually keep silent about the harassment of Jews and people that support Israel. Based on that I understand how some may make an honest mistake and blame it on European culture. At least here in Norway the only thing you can reasonably blame on our culture is our stupid trust in government, media, text books and the consensus. The introduction of the Jew hatred is gradual. (Example: In my early teens the average person hadn't experienced hearing someone use the word "Jew" as a derogatory term. Today I'm not surprised when someone use it like that) Slowly, issue by issue, Norway has been changed. Most people don't hate Jews... yet. But over the decades the "moderate" position has moved towards Jew hatred. The biggest source of the changes is globalist leftists (not national socialists) and Muslims. (Note that not all globalist leftists and/or Muslims are Jew haters) The globalist leftists have done a large effort via their journalists, text book authors, teachers, politicians, singers and artists. (Example: I attended a public school as a child. Once it had a cultural arrangement during school hours. A singer performed the song "Et barn er skutt i Betlehem" ("A child is shoot in Bethlehem"). "Et barn er født i Betlehem" ("A child is born i Bethlehem") is a popular Norwegian Christmas carol) Harassment against Jews and people that support Israel usually don't get attention in the media. The globalist leftists journalists usually "don't find it news worthy". (Example: A Jew refused to denounce Israel and was violently attached. The media didn't mention it. A homosexual got violently attacked in the same way. The media talked about it for days) The (comparatively small) contribution from Jew hating Muslims is mostly via personal relations.

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    76. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... it seems to me the Israeli government uses Judaism as a weapon against their detractors, since nobody can say anything about Israel's bad behavior without being accused of anti-semitism.

      Many people use anti-Zionism against Israel as a cloak for anti-Semitism.

      The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews

      Are you trying to prove him right? Because FYI, you're doing a stellar job of it.

    77. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      But hey, Cold War realpolitik is weird like that.

      FTFY.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    78. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cusco · · Score: 1

      ICBM = Inter-Continental Ballistic Missile. Apparently you didn't know that. The only way that Iran's missiles could be considered to be ICBMs is if they were launching it across the Behring Straight. They have a SRBM, a Short-Range Ballistic Missile, and have tested a prototype of a Medium-Range Ballistic Missile, but you don't have to worry about them launching Korans into Iowa yet.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    79. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have hard time understanding how criticism against human rights violations and sniping children would be considered "anti-semitic" if it's perpetrated by israelis. That is neither fair or balanced in any way, it's crazy.

      The song is a critique against the costly occupation perpetrated by Israel against palestinians in both collateral, deaths and material damage. Some people are tired sick of hearing, seeing and reading about palestinian children being killed and suffering for no fault of their own.

      If you do not understand why they chose this song you might want to google the name of it and see all the spontaneous comments by norwegians reacting to yet another child her and there being killed or mamed in bethlehem. If palestinians would have the gall to have the same inability to understand criticism they've would have rightfully been angry when people sing about their dead children.

      Israelis and zionists get into your head, criticism against the state of israel illegal practices and occupation, killing, maiming, stealing, terrorizing innocents is not anti-semitism, it's rightful criticism and you should take notice. Sooner or later the patience of the world will run out and a solution will be forced upon israelis and palestinians.

      "Jeg har ingen verdens ting mot jøder eller den enkelte israeler. Dette handler om staten Israels okkupasjon. Og det vil koste å bo i en okkupantstat så lenge okkupasjonen pågår. "

      "I don't have a thing in the world against jews or for that matter against israelis. This is about the occupation perpetrated by the state of israel. And it will continue to cost living as an occupier as long as the occupation continues."

      Source: http://www.rogalandsavis.no/meninger/kommentar/article5428938.ece

    80. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cusco · · Score: 1

      There was a politician in Peru who used to call out the military for its excesses in the battle against the Sendero Luminoso. He abruptly retired when he received a photo in the mail of his daughter leaving her grade school, taken through a rifle scope. Keep in mind that corporations like Blackwater (whatever its name is today) knowingly hire international war criminals guilty of massacres of peasants, and then tell me how much chance you think there is that Congress will "grow a pair of balls".

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    81. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I fucking hate America and anyone who supports it. Not because they are Christians, because they are a bunch of terrorists that refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Because they take land that isn't theirs by force then act surprised when the people that live there fight back. Because they are a constant source of problems for people on the other side of the world which they attack for bad reasons.

      Also, it amazes me how anti-everything they are. When I was working in law enforcement, I must have been called by over 20 American law enforcement personnel. EVERYONE was as arrogant as hell. Most self-righteous bunch of people I've ever encountered. I had an easier time getting gang members to cooperate, during an investigation, with me not speaking a word of slang.

    82. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

    83. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by r1348 · · Score: 1

      1- I suppose you mean Kurdistan and the genocide of the Armenians? Yes, both subjects are openly debated here.

      2- I suppose you mean Western Sahara? I admit there's not much public debate about it and I myself wold like to know more.

      3- I suppose you mean the invasion of Tibet? Yes, the subject is very openly debated and European countries host the Dalai Lama as a foreign dignitary, he even had speeches in various Parliaments.

      4- I'm not sure what you refer to, if it's Indochina, that was fallout of ill-fated colonial politics that was not much different than the end of Colonialism for many other Western countries, US included. Anyway yes, we study Colonialism and its end (or rather transformation) at school.

      And just one last question, who are we clowns supposed to defend ourselves from?

    84. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by causality · · Score: 1

      Norman Finkelstein is a Jewish Antisemite. A useful idiot at best, a self-hating Jew at worst.

      Is Chris Rock a self-hating African American for doing a skit about how he "loves black people" but "hates niggers" (his words) and fears getting mugged or assaulted by them and owns guns to protect himself from them?

      The general unwritten rule of Political Correctness is that a member of a minority group who criticizes that group cannot be considered a racist or ethnocentrist.

      Of course you know, the childish concern over who hates whom and what terrible name with which you should brand them has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO with the truth of what they say. You do know that, right? If the worst racist in the world claims that two plus two equals four, he would be correct, unless you want to give such scum the power to redifine all of mathematics while you're at it.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    85. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Sun · · Score: 1

      Do you agree they are separate things though? Would you say it is possible to be opposed to Israel's treatment of the Palestinians and arguably illegal annexation of land, because of the facts rather than their Jewishness?

      (Sorry for fixing your quote. Otherwise your establishing your views as fact, which I'm sure you're too interested in the truth to do).

      As someone who often takes part in those highly informed discussions (aka mud slinging), almost always on the Pro-Israeli side, I've come to categorize the anti-Israel commenters into three groups:

      Informed Dissenters
      Those are people who take an objective look at things, and decide they disagree with some of the decisions taken by the Israeli government.

      You hardly ever hear them. The reason being - they are not extreme enough. Under the correct conditions, I can be considered a member of that group. When you criticize someone, you point to specific decisions and actions and voice your opinion about them. Over a background of people yelling "RACISM" and "MURDER", you are never heard.

      Misinformed Dissenters
      These are often otherwise intelligent and moral individuals, who, for some reason, think that in this particular issue it is okay to:
      1. Not bother to hear both sides of the story before strongly making up your mind, thereafter not bothering to listen to anything anyone tells them to the contrary
      and
      2. Thinking it is okay to shout said misinformed mind in every possible forum, whether relevant or not.

      My personal hobby is to politely make these people confornt their own holes in their logic until cognitive dissonance causes them to call me names. At least on Slashdot, they often see they went out of line (I did say they were otherwise intelligent and moral). I like to think that enough doubt seeps in for them to eventually drop either 1 or 2 from the list above.

      Haters
      They are not misinformed (i.e. - believe facts that are incorrect). They don't care what the truth is. They want Israel down. They will carry signs in demonstrations saying things like "A child murdered every week".

      Trying to bring context into discussions with these guys is often a game of whack a mole. Try to bring context into discussions about the blockage of Gaza, and they answer you about the separation wall. Talk about the context of that, and they answer you about occupation. Talk about that, and they shift to the 48 displacement. Talk about that, and they bring up the Balfur declaration. I once replied to that by providing the actual quote of the actual declaration (unabridged), and was accused of selectively quoting from wikipedia.

      The bottom line of those is that the mere idea of a "Jewish state" is illegitimate in their eyes. The idea that the Jewish people deserve to govern their own affairs (the definition Zionism) is racism. Those, I am quite happy to call "Antisemists". They do not think that Italy being an Italian Catholic country has anything racist about it.

      So, no, not every criticism of Israel is a result of bigotry. Some of it is, and a lot of it is just people being people, acting like people, and not making any sense at all. Very little of it is actually informed, and that last group tends to be the mildest of them all.

      Shachar

    86. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by erikkemperman · · Score: 1

      According to international law the West Bank settlements are illegal, period. Nothing arguable about it.

      Other than fixing my quote, you appear to be saying that yes there are various types of Israel critics, but essentially they are all different shades of stupid. Which you distinguish only by your ability to set them straight. Thankfully you allow there might be a tiny minority that is reasonable but remains unheard.

      Well I can agree that it is hard to find reasonable discussion on the subject. That is on the reflexive supporters too, though.

      --
      Gosh, thanks. That must be why the other ships call me Meatfucker -- GCU Grey Area (Eccentric)
    87. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Xest · · Score: 1

      "I believe the answer to those questions is 'No!!". So that might explain why Americans tend to think that Europeans are a bunch of anti-Semtes."

      Actually the answer is yes to all of them, so if America thinks otherwise then it's classic American ignorance of the world.

      "You clowns can't even defend yourselves without massive American aid. Fix your own fouled nest before criticizing others."

      Sorry? Which country has required European support for pretty much every war in it's history? From your dependence on France in your war of independence, through to the fact the British had already destroyed much of the Luftwaffe and German navy, and had it's colonies striking the Japanese before you even came close to entering World War II to your inability to have the war you wanted in Syria because you couldn't get British backing.

      I don't think it's Europe that's dependent on America for military action, quite the opposite - in fact when you have gone it alone or at least, almost entirely gone it alone like Somalia, Lebanon, Vietnam, and Cambodia you've been defeated almost every time.

      Stop being ignorant and get a clue before making a fool of yourself next time.

    88. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fucking hate America and anyone who supports them. Not (just) because they are nutso-crazy Christians, because they are a bunch of terrorists that refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Because they take land that isnt their by force, act surprised when the people that live there fight back, and then completely wipe them out in a genocide. Because they are a constant source of problems for the entire fucking world which they bomb, drone, spy on at a Big-brother level and generally make life a misery for us all as much as possible for no fucking reason. And because they are the most arrogant and rude people I have ever encountered, who are absolutely convinced of their own inherent righteousness and superiority for no fucking reason at all.

    89. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Sun · · Score: 1

      According to international law the West Bank settlements are illegal, period. Nothing arguable about it.

      So, essentially, you are saying "I am right, and how dare you say otherwise". Exemplary use of logic and facts to foster discussion. Even if we accept the "illegal" part, however, (and, like I said, claiming there is no argument over that point is easily proven wrong), to the best of my knowledge, the settelments have never been annexed, unlike what your claim says.

      Other than fixing my quote, you appear to be saying that yes there are various types of Israel critics, but essentially they are all different shades of stupid.

      I do not think I did. In fact, I don't think any of the synonyms of "stupid" even appeared in my comment. The middle groupd I clearly labeled as "human". The last one can best be referred to as "truth agnostic". The only reference to IQ I made was to claim that being a member of the middle group does not make you either stupid or moraly corrupt (my original phrase was "otherwise intelligent and moral").

      In fact, confirmation bias is a well known trait in areas far removed from this particular conflict.

      Thankfully you allow there might be a tiny minority that is reasonable but remains unheard.

      Feel free to point out counter examples. Which one would draw your attention. Someone saying "Israel murders hundreds of children every year", or "Israel's decision to attack in Gaza is wrong, despite the missile attacks on it".

      Well I can agree that it is hard to find reasonable discussion on the subject. That is on the reflexive supporters too, though.

      With these last statements I do, in fact, agree. It is part of why I categorized the behavior as "human". All I can do about that, however, is do my very best not to be part of that particular problem.

      Can you say you are doing the same?

      Shachar

    90. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      > "I don't blame him" and "innocent" are two different things.

      I don't make much distinction and if I did I would point out that there was no scene where he was prosecuted and convicted for anything so, he is in fact, innocent. Just as we know Al Capone was innocent of everything except tax evasion.

      I mean generally speaking I am against any sort of non-consensual violence, but I am no pacifist. I am perfectly fine taking the general view that committing non-defensive violent acts can merit a response. The response being merited, I have trouble, personally, assigning guilt to a person who makes it.

      Given what the story implies they tried to do, I would even say he did the right thing. He demonstrated being an upright citizen, and not being able to do it himself, he contracted the job out. It was still the right thing to do, and he still paid for it with his own hands and time.

      He was a good man. A paragon of virtue.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    91. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Genocide? Israel has affirmative action programs for arabs with minimum (minimum, as in at least X have to be accepted) quotas for university acceptance and for government employment... not exactly a staple of ethnic cleansing or genocide.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    92. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Reason doesn't account for disproportionate emphasis. It may be true that I have a mole, but if that's all anyone talks about and tries characterize me solely based on the presence of the mole, then they are trying to smear. The relationship between Jews and Arabs in Israel is at the very least "complicated." Israelis are much more akin to Arabs in their sentiments, food choices, etc. than they are to Europeans. But they are viewed as if they were some overlords trying to tower over an indigenous (think native American) population. It's not even remotely the case though.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    93. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Now, because of WW2, being antisemitic in Europe is associated with being fascist

      Which is why it's a cultural no-no. Just like racism is a cultural no-no in the US because of the lynchings.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    94. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      I suppose you mean Kurdistan and the genocide of the Armenians? Yes, both subjects are openly debated here.

      Openly debated, ha? Well, that's good. How is that comparable to the guttural visceral reaction to Israel's not treating with the utmost care the Palestianians who are shooting at them? How is that reaction justified from the likes of France, which would invade an African country on a whim; or from Britain which would bomb Argentina over a territorial dispute over an island? During times of open hostilities Israel treats the hostiles as hostiles. That's not racism. That's life.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    95. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Only governments try to change those. They stay the same though. Money is just a token for enumerating exchange. You can pretend it's something else, but all such pretense is just fiction.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    96. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by superwiz · · Score: 1

      That's not racism as much as it is older generation of immigrants feeling entitled to get ahead of the new generation of immigrants. It's more akin to the conflicts between Irish and Italians in NY at the beginning of the 20th century.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    97. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I fucking hate [the U.S.A.] and anyone who supports it. Not because they are [arrogant dumb asses], because they are a bunch of [money hungry capitalist pigs] that refuse to take responsibility for their actions. Because they [start wars without evidence] then act surprised when the people that live there fight back [and get pissed off]. Because they are a constant source of problems for all the [world] which they [police and force their own views upon] for no reason.

      Also it amazes me how [ignorant of world affairs and other cultures] they are.

    98. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by sveinungkv · · Score: 1

      I said Jew hatred, not antisemitism. If you were trying to be nice by making it easier for me I thank you for your charity. As I would like to keep defending the more narrow term in this debate I'll keep using it. (The term "antisemitism" is today being used more widely)

      In the post you replied to my main focus was on how the actions of a subset of Norwegian globalist leftists, from now on referred to as the "Norwegian leftists", not European culture, carries most of the blame for the "moderate" position moving towards Jew hatred. This could be true even if the motivation of the Norwegian leftists isn't Jew hatred. You are still on topic. I did call them Jew haters even if it wasn't my main point.

      My position isn't that any criticism against Israel is Jew hatred. My position is that Jew hatred is an extremely probable cause of the Norwegian leftists' criticism against Israel.

      How much energy do the Norwegian leftists use to object when Muslims violate the rights of other Muslims in Syria? (What if "their" side, if the leftist group they belong to have one in Syria, is the rights violator?) How about when Muslim Arabs violate the rights of Christian Arabs? I can't see it. An Israeli Jew shooting a Muslim Palestinian Arab in self defense during combat seem to upset the average Norwegian leftist more than a Muslim Arab decapitating a kidnapped Christian Arab in Syria.

      Why? It can't be a love for Palestinian Arabs. Was that the case the Norwegian left would have cared about what was done to the Christian Palestinian Arab community in Bethlehem after the Israeli government let the "Freedom Fighters" occupy it. It can't be a love for Palestinian Arab Muslims. Was that the case they would not have (hero) worshiped Yasser "Martyrs" Arafat. They would also have used energy to protest what Hamas and Fatah is doing to each other and, more importantly, to their own civilians.

      Norwegian leftists are furious about Israel having the gall to build the "wall". Most of it is a fence. The wall section are meant to block the view of "Freedom Fighter" snipers. Norwegian leftists names it after the wall part. When I see them protest it they always show pictures of the wall sections.

      The Norwegian leftists can claim to not be motivated by hatred against Jews as much as they like. If they wish to be believed they must present a believable alternative explanation. If such an explanation exist they should state it more often. Generations of Norwegian children have been moved towards Jew hatred by watching how some of the Norwegian leftists they trust prioritize their efforts.

      a solution will be forced upon israelis and palestinians.

      How?

      --
      Spelling/grammar nazis welcome (English is not my first language and I am trying to improve my spelling/grammar)
    99. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      Hmm, at second glance, I think you're quite right!

      Fancy that ! :)

    100. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Occams · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It is impossible to criticize Israel without being accused of antisemitism. Of course they share intelligence with the USA. They owe us big time. This is a dog bites man story: expected, and therefore not news.

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    101. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Occams · · Score: 1

      Israel treats Palestinians the way the USA treated American natives, and the way the Germans treated Jews. Of all the people who should know better.........

      --
      Heavy is the head that wears the tinfoil hat.
    102. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Israel's agenda is to cause World War III.

    103. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you wear "islamic" clothing? You are obviously neither arab or muslim. Astroturfing trying to give muslims a bad rep?

    104. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can continue to live in your surreal world view. If you but tried to actually read the criticisms instead of rolling eyes and notice everytime Palestinian victims are named.

      You are also playing semantics and fact fiction and the typical usage of deflection tactics, where the self-proclaimed protectors of israel trying to point fingers at worse examples. Israel should be able to stand for their own actions, especially as it calls itself western and gets benefits given to countries with certain standards (few of which israel actually manages to follow).

      Israel has never been criticism (at least to my knowledge) for killing or defending herself during combat or attacks. It's the collateral damage, collective punishments and occupation. Israel has been accused of creating a situation where she gets attacked i.e. occupation, using civilian shields and occupiers inside occupied territory i.e. settlements, and much more.

      There has to be a good reason why there are so many dead Palestinian children and it's not the myth of human shields, especially when Israel bombs schools with white phosphorus a chemical banned against civilian populations and is considered as a banned chemical weapon against non-military targets or in areas where civilians are endangered by it.

      One can easily google all these facts, and reasons for why Israel is considered a criminal state, and I for one am happy that so many people are now getting themselves informed about the situation in the holy land and more information is available and not just hasbara.

    105. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not agree more.

    106. Re:Who Says they Never Paid for those Nukes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Jane's Defense Weekly in 2010, Israel has between 100 and 300 nuclear warheads. The CIA believes the Israel has nuclear weapons. Read about it here: http://www.wikipedia/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel.

  2. As Jon Stewart said recently... by Noryungi · · Score: 3, Funny

    The US NSA is the very first thing you are looking for in a good partner: a good listener!

    This is becoming better and better all the time...

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:As Jon Stewart said recently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a world of difference between a good listener and a stalker.

  3. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the brave journalists with integrity who aren't shills to the broader agenda are staggering their releases over a period of time to keep this in the public eye, the story would be buried with another Miley Cyrus or school shooting distraction if they blew their wad all at once. They are doing the right thing, fighting the good fight, and discrediting and bringing light to the corporatist warmongering pigs and the crypto-Zionists pulling their strings.

    -- Ethanol-fueled

  4. Old tune by hebertrich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We all know the Israeli secret services are total bastards , they killed Arafat spy on everyone etc .. We all know the NSA is again total bastards that stop at nothing. What we need to know is how to defeat them and pull the reins back in and get back in control of those gone rogue agencies that have respect for neither Constitution ,Law nor Country . The secret services play by a different set of rules .. you have the right to do everything , as long as you don't get caught .
    They got caught , yet face none of the consequences. Game over. Total surveillance is now a reality and that's it. As long as noone marches in on the capitals around the world by the millions , why should they change anything ? Noone opposes . Thank you George Orwell ... but your warning ,in the end , changed nothing.

    1. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's your answer: Israel is not one of USA states, and won't be "reined back in control" by US constitution. If someone in Mossad think that it's good idea to spy on whatever French politician, my advise to him/her - "go ahead". That's what we maintain Mossad for, you know.
      Now, I don't know about US, but in Israel there are actually real terrorists. The kind of "blow buses/shoot on cars/plant bombs". And yes, I would like to see them all caught and/or executed.

    2. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now, I don't know about US, but in Israel there are actually real terrorists. The kind of "blow buses/shoot on cars/plant bombs". And yes, I would like to see them all caught and/or executed.

      In your opinion, should the Mossad agents who plant car bombs (e.g. in Iran) also be caught and/or executed, or is that a completely different thing because of the Holocaust(tm)?

    3. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And yes, I would like to see them all caught and/or executed.

      Because that wouldn't just create more terrorists.

      That is the thing with terrorism, when you take extreme measures you only create more.

    4. Re:Old tune by FridayBob · · Score: 1

      ...What we need to know is how to defeat them and pull the reins back in and get back in control of those gone rogue agencies that have respect for neither Constitution ,Law nor Country...

      That may be a tall order in some other countries, but in the United States the way to do it is with Article Five of the Constitution, which says that there are two ways to alter that document, the second one being a national convention assembled at the request of the legislatures of at least two-thirds (min. 34) of the 50 states, after which the change must be ratified by at least three-fourths (min. 38) of the states.

      Article V is a powerful tool that way included specifically to bypass a corrupt Congress. We need to use it now to get money out of politics, which is ultimately reason for our dysfunctional Congress. Our representatives no longer work for us: they work for the big corporations, such as Booz Allen Hamilton (BAH), the company that developed the PRISM program for the NSA. BAH earns almost all of its money from US government contracts, and it is extremely likely that they annually spend millions of their earnings to legally bribe our politicians in order to keep those contracts coming. This situation has become a gigantic self-licking ice cream cone that must be stopped.

      If this makes sense to you, I would suggest signing this petition: WOLF-PAC. Launched in October 2011 for the purpose of passing a 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that will end corporate personhood* and publicly finance all elections**. Article V is necessary because Congress won't pass such an Amendment on its own, but already many states have reacted with enthusiasm, notably Texas. If successful, we should see a much more respectable group of politicians emerge within one or two election cycles -- a group that can be trusted to put an end to this huge spying scandal.

      .

      *) The aim is not to end legal personhood for corporations, but natural personhood. The latter became a problem following the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, which granted some of the rights of natural persons to corporations and makes it easier for them to lend financial support to political campaigns.

      **) At the State level, more than half of all political campaigns are already publicly financed in some way, so there would be nothing strange about doing the same for political campaigns for federal office.

      PS -- If we do succeed in using Article V for this purpose, it won't be the first time it was used. The reason we can directly elect our senators today is because Nebraska started calling for an Article V Convention way back in in 1893.

    5. Re:Old tune by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      That's all fine, but Israelis seem to always come crying to us for military support. How about you all start incorporating the limitations of YOUR military into your foreign policy?

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 21st Amendment was passed in the same manner, as I recall. The method is there for a reason.

    7. Re:Old tune by ImOuttaHere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This, to me, is one of the many fascinating things about America. When sh*t like this happens, there is the inevitable question of what kinds of things people can do to change the way things are. Yet, when you talk with people from other countries and you talk about this kind of sh*t, they many times will respond with what they personally are doing to change the way things are.

      Come on, America. You're a smart bunch of people. Save yourselves. You really need to figure it out. Seriously. There are at LOT of things that can be done to rein in your out of control three letter agencies, politicians who want to burn the place to the ground, and the greedy bankers and corporate officers who know you'll continue to buy the sh*t they have for sale. Nothing will change until you actually _do_ something. So get with it and _do_ what _needs_ to be done.

      ... What we need to know is how to defeat them and pull the reins back in and get back in control of those gone rogue agencies that have respect for neither Constitution ,Law nor Country ...

    8. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In your opinion, should the Mossad agents who plant car bombs (e.g. in Iran) also be caught and/or executed, or is that a completely different thing because of the Holocaust(tm)?

      Some Mossad agents risked their lives to kill a few nuclear scientists in Iran.
      Are they terrorists or heroes? Depends on who you ask.

      For most iranians, they are terrorists because they killed some innocent scientist.
      For most israelis, they are heroes because they are sabotaging the nuclear weapons program.

      You could even argue that by killing a few scientists they are preventing a full scale war which would kill many more people. This, and Stuxnet are probably the reasons why there has been no war yet.

      Now let me counter your question with this one:
      In your opinion, should the Iranian agents that blew up in AMIA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_Bombing be considered heroes or terrorists?
      They killed 85 jewish people in Argentina. For what reason?

    9. Re:Old tune by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      No reasonable person can debate that it is illegal assassination, and that it's terrorism intended to scare scientists away from any nuclear work. Whether you approve of the illegal terrorism or not is a separate issue. There are no doubt times when terrorism could be justified, though I don't think this is one of them.

      You could even argue that by killing a few scientists they are preventing a full scale war which would kill many more people. This, and Stuxnet are probably the reasons why there has been no war yet.

      The only thing that would ensure no wars with Iran is Iran having a nuclear bomb. Same reason there's no chance of war with North Korea.

      In your opinion, should the Iranian agents that blew up in AMIA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMIA_Bombing [wikipedia.org] be considered heroes or terrorists?

      What kind of ridiculously idiotic question is that? Of course they're terrorists. The issue is your implicit belief that if any part of the government of a country commits a terrorist act it becomes no longer terrorism when you commit terrorist acts against other people employed by that government.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    10. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All ears for ideas on how to fix our government. However, spying on other countries is the least of my concerns.

    11. Re:Old tune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, high functioning gypsies that make the best contributions in arts science and technology.

  5. Not a big surprise by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Considering how much spying Israel does on the U.S., and all the secrets they've stolen from us in exchange for unequivocal support at the UN, and then ask to have their spies returned to them because they're "heroes", this shouldn't surprise anyone.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  6. Why all of this surprise? by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From these "world leaders" to journalists, why all of the 'surprise?' Spying is one of the things that governments do, ALL of them. They ALL spy on their allies and foes alike and it has always been this way. In the US/Israel context, we both spy on each other all day, every day, and assist with information on other countries too. France does the same thing, so does England. Nothing new here.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
    1. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure canabalistic societies use similar arguments when confronted by non-canabalistic ones.

      You also seem to be conflating governments with their people.

      It would seem that most people actually find this behaviour disgusting.

      Of course, you could be arguing that governments shouldn't care about the wishes of its people?

    2. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Remember how the US started throwing political trouble at France after 9/11, when we found out they were selling weapons to our enemies? And remember how we've been poking fun at the Russians for years because of their Soviet history? And remember how we've been complaining about Chinese manufacturing and work conditions while still buying their products?

      Everyone else remembers.

      Our attitude since the Cold War has been that we are perfect infallible masters of all things political. No revolutions, a stable economy, and generally widespread support for our military. Now we've been caught with our hand in the cookie jar, so to speak, so it's a convenient excuse to vent the frustrations of the past few decades. The US has fallen from its pedestal, and now every country we've ever embarrassed has free reign to do the same right back to us. Of course everyone's spying on everyone, including their own citizens, but we're the ones who got caught.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you,... not everyone lives in a police state like yours...

      Some of us live in countries where the spy agencies have little capabilities if any.

      Btw. don't ever again dare to talk about democracy and freedom in the USA...

    4. Re:Why all of this surprise? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      This is exactly right.

      Of course part of the continual mutual spying is that whenever one country screws up and gets caught spying on an ally, the government of the "victim" has to feign outrage. Public opinion demands it, and a politician either rides the wave, or gets smashed against the rocks by it.

      So there's really no point in trying to point out that "everyone does it" to people expressing outrage about spying. Just let the kibuki theater proceed at its own pace. Its nature's way.

    5. Re:Why all of this surprise? by X.25 · · Score: 1

      From these "world leaders" to journalists, why all of the 'surprise?' Spying is one of the things that governments do, ALL of them. They ALL spy on their allies and foes alike and it has always been this way. In the US/Israel context, we both spy on each other all day, every day, and assist with information on other countries too. France does the same thing, so does England. Nothing new here.

      I think you might be confusing "spying" with "breaking all kinds of local and international laws, crossing all possible lines and doing acts to others on a daily basis which your own government considers as acts of war".

      But please, just keep justifying.

    6. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From these "world leaders" to journalists, why all of the 'surprise?' Spying is one of the things that governments do, ALL of them. They ALL spy on their allies and foes alike and it has always been this way. In the US/Israel context, we both spy on each other all day, every day, and assist with information on other countries too. France does the same thing, so does England. Nothing new here.

      I think you might be confusing "spying" with "breaking all kinds of local and international laws, crossing all possible lines and doing acts to others on a daily basis which your own government considers as acts of war".

      But please, just keep justifying.

      Spying is all about breaking laws. It is "illegal" everywhere and all governments do it, always have, always will. Maybe you are confused on this topic in general, so keep writing.

    7. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I was shocked in 2008 when I read that Sarkozy and Merkel talked to each other about EU policies through SMS. Apparently, both French and German leaders do think that spying does not happen, that cell phones are secure, and are genuinely surprised by what happened.

      The only thing Snowden has really revealed was the degree of incompetence of the politicians in my country (France)

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    9. Re:Why all of this surprise? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      He didn't say spying was good, right, or legal. He said it's reality among governments, and always has been.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Re:Enough already... by Austrian+Anarchy · · Score: 1

    We KNOW all about the intercepts now, why is it a headline everytime The Guardian throws-out a new "discovery"?

    Eyeballs.

    --
    Time Bomber the Book coming soon.
  8. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keith, is that you?

  9. Snowden claims he isn't hurting American interests by schneidafunk · · Score: 0

    I understand his reasons for releasing information about domestic spying, but what good reason does he have for releasing information about spying on the international scene?

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  10. Re:Enough already... by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 1
    We know - yes. Now we want political and legal action, arrests and all round justice served across at last count 35 countries at the very least. That has not happened yet, most countries are feigning outrage by have not tasked their justice system to start prosecuting all those traitors in and out of the telecoms industry hat have helped violated their respective countries sovereignty, or in the US case our constitution and various other laws, lying to congress etc.

    My question is: Where are all the nationalistic flag waving types now - usually they are very vocal when our constitution is violated on such a massive scale, or various countries National security is violated in such a brazen systematic way. Has the French right wing press (for example) not turned on the heat to mobilize their outrage - why not?

  11. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because the world != US only, and yes, we care.

  12. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Because...Fuck You!

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  13. Reaction Inversely Proportional to Size of Truth by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    The thing about all this is, the speed of the reaction is inversely proportional to the size of the truth. When a reality star is caught with drugs, the reaction is instantaneous. When Congress self-destructs, it takes months and years for the reaction and its consequences to fully unfold. What we're talking about here is the ripping away of the entire illusion under which we've been living the past 60 years. It's big, and most people don't even want to try to wrap their heads around what it means; but denial won't make it go away. This is a turning point in history, mark my words.

    From here, more forward-thinking people and groups will begin moving in different directions than before and when the changes come they will be breath-taking. Recall the fall of the Berlin Wall. Glasnost and Perestroika had been going on for years at that point under Gorbachev, and suddenly in the space of a few weeks the Berlin Wall fell, and nearly every country locked away behind the Iron Curtain was free. It took another two years for Romania and Russia to sort themselves out, but they did.

    What shape will those changes take, exactly? Who knows. But eventually Washington DC must fall and its masters brought to justice. We may suffer through a true police state with gulags before then, but eventually we will have a new social compact. I hope that the reset is clean, with none of the old masters surviving into the new system. Those sociopaths threaten the entire species.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  14. RTFA! Le Monde does NOT say Israel spied on France by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the actual source, all it says is that the NSA did not ask Israel whether it was responsible for the tapping.

    Even the Le Monde article, a commentary on the source material, does not claim that Israel targeted the french. The strongest statement that Le Monde makes regarding Israel is: "The NSA does not say that the Mossad carried out the attack but nevertheless, seems to consider it necessary to mention the existence of a reasonable doubt as regards the Jewish state."

    Thanks Antiwar for another misleading article deliberately trying to blame Israel for something there is no evidence of.

  15. US did it, read the whole article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Read the last lines.
    "The American authorities noted that the activities of the intelligence service "were carried out according to law"."

    It's almost like a confession from the US.

    Main article says, France evidence points to USA. US denies it. US says it asked 1st and 2nd party countries if they did it, they say no. It did not ask Israel because Israel won't talk to US about France.

    Hence finger points to Israel. Israel denies it.

    Occams razor.
    Look, the evidence says it was US, US spied on Merkel, US practically confesses when asked "it was done legally" and has all the tools and bases and so on.

    NSA.

    1. Re:US did it, read the whole article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hush, don't spoil the party.

      Israel's at fault, whether it's true or not.

    2. Re:US did it, read the whole article by smoohta · · Score: 1

      Don't you dare get back to the actual subject! Israel must be at fault here somehow :)

    3. Re:US did it, read the whole article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is clearly an act of genocide by Israel. Don't try to bother us with facts.

  16. Don't you remember the Dreyfus Affair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is yellow journalism. When you have actual facts (which engineers and nerds actually thrive on) please re-post.

  17. Re:Enough already... by jobsagoodun · · Score: 1

    er... this is /.'s report on these reports - you're going to have to read the dupes too!

  18. Re:Enough already... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    We KNOW all about the intercepts now, why is it a headline everytime The Guardian throws-out a new "discovery"?

    Correction... WE know all about the intercepts now. But the mass audience the Guardian wants to reach isn't as well informed. Also, they appear to be attempting to leverage pressure from both internal targets of the NSA (i.e. citizens of the United States) and inappropriate external ones to exert more pressure on the government to do the right thing.

    --
    Who did what now?
  19. Re:Reaction Inversely Proportional to Size of Trut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Russia sure sorted itself out, what with Tsar Vladimir's sham elections and everything.

    Oh, but they changed their flag back to the old European-style tricolor instead of the big red one, so that makes everything okay.

  20. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowden handed a large set of documents to a few journalists with explicit instructions on how to get it out there without doing unnecessary harm, actually. We won't see this information harming active surveillance or active efforts.

    But 'international scene' makes it sound like you think the French are legitimate espionage targets. When they are almost the only state willing to follow you militarily into Syria, it is perhaps not a good idea for it to be shown your intelligence agency is eavesdropping on them. It begins to look like manipulation.

    It's good for Europe to know how much not to trust you. It's somewhat hilarious to us in the UK that it was ever even a remote possibility that David Cameron might have been spied on; couldn't they just have phoned and demanded he tell them what they want?

  21. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what Snowden's reasons are, but the rest of the world thanks him for giving us proof of what is going on.

  22. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    trollolol. whine harder fatty.

  23. right by superwiz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So this is the "let's accuse the Israelies so that the US would have no choice but to admit that it was really us" trick? Thanks. I think I already saw that episode of West Wing.

    --
    Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
  24. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there IS not good reason. It's The Guardian trying to stir-up shit and get readership.

  25. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And actually he isn't. He may be hurting the interests of the powerful in the USA. Not those of the people.

    If, and once this mess is cleared, the rest of the world might hold citizens of the USA in higher esteem. I know I'm looking forward to it.

    So, citizens of the USA: grab this chance. Show that you mean your values, that those values aren't just some marketing terms buried in an old and smelly document.

    Go for it!

  26. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's because Snowden doesn't consider those without US citizenship as subhumans, like you do.

  27. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I understand his reasons for releasing information about domestic spying, but what good reason does he have for releasing information about spying on the international scene?

    Because he's not just an upstanding, patriotic American, he's an upstanding, patriotic human.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  28. Re:Reaction Inversely Proportional to Size of Trut by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    When Congress self-destructs,

    Ah, to dream the impossible dream...

    Hate to tell ya, bud, but all that 'self-destruction' we've seen of late is nothing but partisan brinkmanship, and has all become just another part of the political game; you can tell by the fact that congresscritters are still on TV blaming each other, rather than hiding from the lynch mobs, in fear for their lives.

    I will say, I learned something from this latest government shutdown - we, the People, don't really seem to need feds quite as much as the try and convince us we do.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  29. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

    I do in fact consider France a legitimate target. They spy on the U.S. as well.

    "L'Express, the French news magazine, citing intelligence sources in both Paris and Washington, disclosed the French spying operation. It described the cases involving IBM and Texas Instruments, which reportedly took place between 1987 and 1989. The report said that much of the spying was aimed at helping France's Groupe Bull. "
    http://www.nytimes.com/1991/09/14/news/14iht-spy_.html

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  30. Yawn by blanddragon · · Score: 0

    So. /.ers should know better than most the the sheeple do not pay attention to security, except for trying to do an end run around it because they can't watch the YouTube vid at work... People posting to FB tells us more than most want to know, and they do freely This is a straw-man story again.

  31. Jewish Supremacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They are above ALL laws. Gentiles will always be their slaves unless we finally rise, resist and purge this cancer.

    1. Re:Jewish Supremacy by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

      You got the anonymous coward part right. Go dryclean your hood.

    2. Re:Jewish Supremacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, white supremacism vs Jewish supremacism... I don't think I like either of them.

  32. Re:Enough already... by Pumpkin+Tuna · · Score: 1

    Oh please. They are staggering the releases to do maximum harm to the U.S. and to keep their own names in the news longer. It's showing their blatant anti-us bias more than anything.

  33. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop using that signature, I am the real Ethanol-fueled!
    Don't listen to the impostor above.

    -- Ethanol-fueled

  34. Re:RTFA! Le Monde does NOT say Israel spied on Fra by EmagGeek · · Score: 0

    You'll never stop the anti-Semitic Ron Paul dick-sucking brigades from blaming everything on Israel.

  35. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Vintermann · · Score: 2

    Spied. You had to go back 20+ years.

    Sure, other nations have their skeletons in the closet too. But you know, it doesn't justify lying to them. If the Germans are such vile dogs as to deserve no privacy from the US, then let them know. Don't pretend you are the best of friends and would never consider such an act.

    If there is no trust between you, very well, state that fact and let it be at that. But if you pretend there's trust, expect reactions when that trust is shown to be broken.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  36. Re:Enough already... by causality · · Score: 1

    Correction... WE know all about the intercepts now. But the mass audience the Guardian wants to reach isn't as well informed.

    What that puerile bitch Snookie is up to (and like-minded garbage) is sadly much more important to them.

    The minority who try their best to be aware don't deserve to reap what the majority have sown.

    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  37. Why shouldn't they pay an agency they own? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand your surprise.

  38. Say it ain't so! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not 'precious' Israel! They can do no wrong!

  39. Helped? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 2

    Israel Helped the NSA Spy on Former French President According To Documents

    Where does it say Israel helped the NSA? The French accused the US, the US denied it, asked everyone else about it (except the Israelis) and everyone else denied it as well. Right?

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Helped? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      That sounds like classic diplomatic-speak for "we think it was Israel, but we're not telling you that."

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  40. Re:Enough already... by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

    You know, all this confusion could be avoided by having an account and signing in.

    -- Ethanol-fueled (Not a signature, just a statement of my condition)

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  41. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

    So you think they suddenly stopped? Here's one from 2009. http://www.france24.com/en/20110104-france-industrial-espionage-economy-germany-russia-china-business

    While they are making a public fuss, France and Germany are not really surprised the U.S. is spying on them, just as we are not surprised they spy on us. Business is still pushed forward as usual.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  42. Re:Enough already... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    ... the corporatist warmongering pigs and the crypto-Zionists pulling their strings.

    I've heard things like that before. You think the ^wJews Zionist are behind it all? Yes, I think I hear music, I'm just not sure if it's from a play like this, or a parade like that.

    The European Left and Its Trouble With Jews

    If you are the real "Ethanol-fueled," it's time for treatment.

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  43. sigh by Tolkienfanatic · · Score: 0

    The horse - it is bloody. Please just leave it alone and stop beating it :(

  44. What? The documents say no such thing. by cowwoc2001 · · Score: 1

    At no point in the document does the NSA say that Israel planted listening devices. People are doing some very heavy reading between the lines. That's a nice way for the NSA to pin blame on a scapegoat and then turn around saying they never said any such thing.

    People will believe what they want. If they hold a grudge against Israel they will believe this. But if you are interested in the truth and have read what the document *actually* says, at no point was Israel found to be spying.

  45. Why is this an issue? by T-Bucket · · Score: 2

    The NSA is SUPPOSED to be spying on foreign countries. IS that not what our spy agencies do? (CIA, NSA, etc). The issues is with them spying on Americans. Hell, I WANT them tapped into every other government on the planet. The more we know about others, the better for us. Just stay out of my damn e-mail.

    (To be fair, I also understand that, say, the french spy agency, would be trying to spy on OUR government. that's how the world works)

    1. Re:Why is this an issue? by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      I'm sort of conflicted. First off they're supposed to be friendly countries. Second, do you want other countries spying on you? And what's to stop other countries to resell that information back to the US or other interests? Third, wasn't the US trying to establish how hacking into the US is an act of war? Now it turns they've been doing it to everyone else?

      Lastly you're undermining the internet in general. Less trust in an open network will turn people into making fragmented segments for their own countries due to spying. It will hurt business, it will hurt freedom. It's ridiculously short sighted to do any of this.

    2. Re:Why is this an issue? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Thing is, spying is not seen as a friendly act, and when you're outed, there are going to be consequences.

      In other words, you can do it, but only as long as you don't get caught. That's why you keep it small and quiet, not this kind of major NSA dragnet.

  46. God Damn Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its just that this asshole continues to hap hazardly condemn innocent American lives with his wild hairs up his ass and has no way to shore up the safety for American lives he is endangering by these leaks. He has to be stopped. God Damn Him.

    1. Re:God Damn Snowden by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Its just that this asshole continues to hap hazardly condemn innocent American lives with his wild hairs up his ass and has no way to shore up the safety for American lives he is endangering by these leaks. He has to be stopped. God Damn Him.

      And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why you shouldn't smoke crack.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  47. And isn't it the DGSE... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 2

    ...who spends 25% of their published budget blatantly on industrial espionage on guess who...the UK, US, Canada, China, Germany, and others...

    The international espionage is pretty much *yawn*. Anyone who has ever followed international politics on any level knows everybody does it to each other. And all the players certainly know it.

    Where the outrage, what little there has been frankly, is the fact that those capabilities were turned inward domestically that has some people ticked off. Again many of us highly suspected this was going on, but we lacked proof. It doesn't surprise me when it comes to things like parallel construction and massive dragnets. Yes it should be illegal, but even if it is, there are ways around it such as giving our cousins over at GCHQ the access, let them do the spying on americans and pass it back in the name of "cooperation".

    What saddens me is that the only thing that can stop this insanity are the people of the United States. And most don't seem to care. As long as there is Football on the weekends to keep the masses entertained...

    I said after 9/11 there were some things we needed to look at like adding armored cockpit doors to airplanes, reassessing and even so far as banning sharped objects on carryon. We needed some sort of centralized intelligence operations. It was clear there was too much politicking for budgets instead of working together. US Intelligence had all the pieces, but spread across too many agencies that wouldn't work together. That needed to be addressed by eliminating and folding agencies. Instead we got DHS. It was sold as just that kind of agency. Instead we've ended up with what is increasingly turning into a domestic para-military agency. I know, they don't have M1 Abrams yet, but they do have their own helicopter gun ships and APC's. TSA has gone from airport rentacops to VIPR teams...

    I remember a couple years ago they were doing drills with the US Army & MO National Guard patrolling the streets of North St. Louis as though it was a war zone (Which maybe arguably it is) in an "Urban Pacification Drill". When the news interviewed locals they welcomed the show of force. The benefit of a doubt part of me knew this was the National Guard showing off some new toys it had gotten. But there is a part of me that also raised an eyebrow.

    If you look at the past 10 - 12 years there's been a chess game afoot here in the US. The governments been setting the board. They've got small scale operations down. Look at how quickly they locked down Boston earlier in the year. Look at how quickly the people followed the orders to cower indoors because of 2 kids.

    We aren't quite there yet, but unless something drastic changes and soon, we're one major "event" away from waking up and no longer in the land of free.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:And isn't it the DGSE... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

      > Look at how quickly the people followed the orders to cower indoors because of 2 kids.

      Really? The "2 kids" in question bombed a public event with improvised explosives, then killed a police officer, hijacked a car and the last one took refuge by hiding in a boat in a local neighborhood. How would the authorities have responded in your magical utopian 'free' country?

    2. Re:And isn't it the DGSE... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      > Look at how quickly the people followed the orders to cower indoors because of 2 kids.

      Really? The "2 kids" in question bombed a public event with improvised explosives, then killed a police officer, hijacked a car and the last one took refuge by hiding in a boat in a local neighborhood. How would the authorities have responded in your magical utopian 'free' country?

      Question: did all that lockdown crap actually have a net positive effect, or did it take some random person stepping into his backyard (which he couldn't do during the martial-law-practice-run) to catch the bomber?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  48. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, aren't you that NSA shill that tries to discredit Snowden in every story?

    -- Ethanol-fueled

  49. Getting Better All The Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next up: Hill-Billy aka Hillary Rodham Clinton. She will detail how she approved to the usage of USA Embassy Buildings in Germany and other European places including Asia, Africa, Australia, Central America, South America and Canada for electronic espionage operations.

    Also to be up: George (Johnny) Walker Bush and his escapades of drunken debauchery while President.

    Get the pop-corn a pop'n Batman!

  50. French media isn't credible when they blame Israel by dszd0g · · Score: 1

    If it was the Guardian making this claim, it would have some bearing. They have some authority in the leaks and have the source material to find this information.

    French media just likes to blame Israel and Jews for everything, so I find little credibility to this article.

    Unless I missed something in the article, everything basically says the US and Israel both deny having any involvement in spying on the French. The Guardian printed that it was the NSA that was spying on the French. While I wouldn't be surprised if Israel also spied on the French, I have not seen any such evidence provided.

    The French article seems to take Israel's denial and that because Israel wasn't mentioned in the leaked NSA documents as the responsible party that obviously they must be involved.

    These kind of Israeli/Jewish conspiracy theories appear regularly in French media, but they don't belong on Slashdot. My Dad's family is from France and Belgium and it is amazing some of the stuff I've seen my grandparents read in French mainstream newspapers. Antisemitism is apparently so bad in France today that Jews that had left France pre-WWII and moved back have been leaving again because they don't feel safe (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Jews_in_France#Post-World_War_II:_North_African_Jewish_migration - See the "Antisemitism and Immigration" section).

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  51. Sorry, no. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    There is a global bankers' conspiracy, they do manipulate governments, and there is nothing intrinsically anti-Semitic about saying so.

  52. Surprise, surprise, surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the only nuclear power in the ME, dedicated to KEEPING that monopoly, a capacity they have used to blackmail the U.S. twice (see U.S.A.F. War College publication "The Bomb In The Basement" for details), Israel requires every advantage they can get to avoid sanctions for Gaza and the West Bank, mass murders like Sabrah and Shatilla and the "break the bones" policy. Thus, be absolutely sure they have their hands into the NSA spy files, either legally or "Lawrence Franklin" style via AIPAC.

  53. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel helped Israel spy on the French

    There, fixed that for you.

  54. Le Monde found guilty of "racist defamation" by dszd0g · · Score: 1

    In fact, this newspaper has even been found guilty by a French court for "racist defamation" against Israel and the Jewish people in the past.

    Sources:
    http://rense.com/general65/aanit.htm
    http://www.tomgrossmedia.com/mideastdispatches/archives/000375.html
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1415355/posts

    As a poster below pointed out, the NSA practically confessed to the spying:

    The American authorities noted that the activities of the intelligence service "were carried out according to law."

    And the documents in the article stated that the NSA said it wasn't a joint operation with the Israelis. The Israeli prime minister's office made an official statement claiming they were not involved.

    All evidence points to the NSA with no Israeli involvement.

    This article is nothing but antisemitism and has no place on Slashdot.

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
    1. Re:Le Monde found guilty of "racist defamation" by cusco · · Score: 1

      Rense? Free Republic? I didn't realize that anyone even went to FR any more, the last time I visited it there were about 30 hard core birthers in an echo chamber left.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
  55. You might want to consider getting off the drug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    called Fox News. I know it is addicting to watch, but watching too much will mess up your logic.

  56. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others on this thread have pointed out, the harm being done isn't to the entire US - it's being done to our elites. The American people are better off knowing the truth.

    Totally fitting captcha: Idolatry

  57. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or by PGP signing your messages, but people on slashdot these days love to talk the talk and not follow through on it.

  58. No US custody of Snowden = no real proof of claims by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    There might be some truth to these claims if Snowden defended himself in a US court of law(as opposed to the PR offensive) with them. Shame that there isn't a greater pursuit to making it perilous to even have the information in hand.

    The only proof so far is based on reaction to claims.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  59. Re:French media isn't credible when they blame Isr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither denies. Israel never denies or confirms. USA confirmed but refused to comment on israeli involvement. If Israel wasn't involved they would have denied israeli involvement. Learn to read political and diplomatic subspeak. Making up your own "israeli denials" won't help your hasbara tactics as today anyone can google anything, any time they have access to internet, and they do usually have it when they are commenting on a internet forum.

    dszd0g: Maybe you should use more reputable sources when clanking down on reputable sources.

  60. Re:French media isn't credible when they blame Isr by dszd0g · · Score: 1

    USA basically confirmed and said it was not a joint operation with Israel.

    If Israel wasn't involved they would have denied israeli involvement.

    The Israeli office of the Prime Minister denied and the USA said it wasn't a join operation. I'm not sure what more you want.

    I don't know how you can argue that lack of proof that Israel was involved proves that they were.

    As far as reputable sources for the Le Monde being found guilty, google "Le Monde found guilty racist defamation". There are dozens of other places that provided the news. Pick whichever ones you do find reputable. Wall Street Journal has it behind its pay wall, but I didn't want to link to a pay wall.

    --
    This message is encrypted with Quad ROT-13 to protect the author's copyright under the DMCA.
  61. USA and Israel = Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    USA, Israel and the UK form the greatest terrorist group in history.

    I've been sensing and saying this for years now, hopefully it seems like it's soon to be accepted as the obvious truth.
    We should shutdown all diplomatic and economical links with those countries and treat them as enemies of peace and freedom from now on until their behavior becomes acceptable.

    Also, as enemies, any coercive action undertaken against that group of countries is now fully justified and should be legal.

    NSA, Mossad, MI6, your time has come.

  62. Millions of Moose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Million come from Canada.. You've seen our Canadian geese in the winter?

  63. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, the right wingers are most often on the side of the authorities. That's what it means to be a right wing authoritarian; they will succumb to the powers that be even if they railed against it just a day before, once they exercise that power. This is a global phenomenon, and history proves it has been happening for quite a long time.

  64. Re:Enough already... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    The only reason why US is harmed by those releases is because US (or rather its government) did some seriously fucked-up shit in secret. Now that it's out in the open, instead of owning up and apologizing, you keep pretending that it's nothing bad, while at the same time scrambling like mad to get revenge on Snowden for exposing you with pants down. It would be sad if it wasn't so hilarious to watch. I wonder what it is the next thing that Obama (or Holder) is going to deny that will be proven to be false by the next release, showing them for the assholes that they are. Gotta get some more popcorn...

  65. Re:Enough already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh please. They are staggering the releases to do maximum harm to the U.S. and to keep their own names in the news longer. It's showing their blatant anti-us bias more than anything.

    Nope, just counter-manipulating the manipulators. Politicians routinely frame debates and do things like announcing embarrassing stuff on Friday evening.

  66. Re:Enough already... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

    Oh please. They are staggering the releases to do maximum harm to the U.S. and to keep their own names in the news longer. It's showing their blatant anti-us bias more than anything.

    I'm pretty sure that reporting the evil acts of the United States government and exposing the hypocrisy of our security state isn't "bias." A better term would be "doing their jobs as journalists." And thank goodness--the press isn't yet completely in sway of an elite, wealthy class of oligarchs hell-bent for leather on wiping out democracy.

    But, in a few more generations...

    --
    Who did what now?
  67. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by Vintermann · · Score: 1

    Ah, the old strategy of posting a link that doesn't say remotely what you suggest, and hoping readers don't notice.

    That link reports an complaint, an unsubstantiated, unspecific allegation from a German contractor, that "the French" (not necessarily French intelligence, could be French industry directly) do industrial espionage a lot. Headline could be "Spurned German contractor doesn't like the French!"

    It's kind of different from proof of spying on heads of state, you know?

    As I said: Breach of trust. Whatever you think they "should" know, it's clear some heads of state expected the US to actually stand by its word and not lie to their face about spying on them.

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  68. Re:Snowden claims he isn't hurting American intere by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

    The article shows that France is spying on its allies. The fact they don't have the technological ability to tap the U.S. president doesn't mean they aren't trying.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin