Slashdot Mirror


A Makerbot In Every Classroom

Daniel_Stuckey writes "At the start of this year, President Obama nicely summed up the grandiose promise of 3D printing — or rather, the hype surrounding it. In his State of the Union address the president suggested the fledgling technology could save manufacturing by ushering in a second industrial revolution. That shout-out inspired a spate of buzzkill blog posts pointing out — rightly enough — that despite its potential, 3D printing is still in its infancy. It's not the panacea for the struggling economy we want it to be, at least not yet. Apparently the naysayers weren't enough to kill the 3D-printing dream, because, with support from the federal government, MakerBot announced its initiative to put a 3D printer in every school in America. The tech startup and the administration are betting big that teaching kids 3D printing is teaching them the skills they'll need as tomorrow's engineers, designers, and inventors." Caveat: Makerbot no longer produces open hardware, and they are pushing proprietary Autodesk software and educational materials as part of the free 3D printer. Makerbot also launched a call for open models of math manipulatives on Thingiverse (you might remember them from elementary school) so that teachers have something useful to print immediately.

152 comments

  1. first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay

  2. Yeah, that's convinced me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A private enterprise forcing the government to create a market for a fad toy?

    1. Re:Yeah, that's convinced me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Fad toy?" That's what they said about home computers in 1980. I don't think you belong here...

    2. Re:Yeah, that's convinced me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A home computer in 1980 could do way more than any cheap piece of plastic one of these printers will ever produce. Those kids would be better off with VIC-20's and Sinclairs, and they would be a lot cheaper.

    3. Re:Yeah, that's convinced me by OffaMyLawn · · Score: 2

      A home computer in 1980 could do way more than any cheap piece of plastic one of these printers will ever produce. Those kids would be better off with VIC-20's and Sinclairs, and they would be a lot cheaper.

      I have to agree with this one.

      My youngest daughter is now in middle school, 7th grade. Her school did not get a Makerbot donated to them, but they did purchase one for the computer lab. I have issue with this, but not because they have a 3D printer. It's because they spend money like this constantly (this isn't the only purchase they've made that I have issue with) and yet they do not even have the proper course materials available for students.

      She has a total of one textbook. And it's of the dead tree variety. I don't believe that they need to make the immediate move to digital, though I think it would be beneficial. I have issue with the fact that they just do not have textbooks for all but one of her classes. So if she is having issues with the material that her teacher feels the need to send home with her, there is nothing for her to turn to for assistance.

      Thankfully her mother and I are capable of helping her, but what about the students that don't have the family resources available to them for help? We also help tutor one of my daughter's friends, as her parents are either not capable or not willing to make themselves available to do so, but we cannot take on every student that needs help. We do not have that kind of time.

      For students in her age range, this is nothing more than a toy. And a waste of money.

  3. I didn't know by Nemyst · · Score: 1

    That President Obama liked — so much he wanted to print it in every school.

    1. Re:I didn't know by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      I cannot help but wonder when MakerBot can have an open source API to its product; I've little appitite for Autodesk, given today's CAM open source solutions.

    2. Re:I didn't know by RenderSeven · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The API is the STL file format, which is pretty open. Just about any CAD program can generate one. Thats fed into either the Makerbot slicer or the open source Skeinforge slicer to generate the X3G files that get sent to the 'Bot. What do you want to do that needs more openness than that?

  4. Welfare is bad... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Unless it's the corporate type.

  5. Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Makerbot isn't open. They want to sell locked in 3D printers.

    1. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by fauxjargon · · Score: 1

      What's worse is the locked in Autodesk software. There are good open 3d printers but good, open 3d CAD software is a little thin on the ground.

    2. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My middle schooler just had me install SketchUp on her laptop, so she could finish a project they had started in class. Not open source, but at least easily available.
      On a related note, I'm always upset when the teachers require the kids to do stuff in Powerpoint; not only is it not open, but they end up being graded on the effects the program adds rather than the content.

    3. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Do you want Our Children to be left behind in the tough, competitive, world of actively destructive management for want of dreadful powerpoint skills?

    4. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by RenderSeven · · Score: 1

      WTF is "locked in"? Or what is a "locked in printer" in general for that matter? I have one, I use it nearly every day, and if there is anything "locked in" Im completely missing it. I do use 123D Design for modeling, but also Sketchup and Solidworks and Ive tried others and they happily interoperate. I get PLA from China, aftermarket parts from eBay, and Makerbot even supports that. Their website even promotes open source 3d modeling software.

    5. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. is about advertising products on behalf of their corporate owners. They are paid to ensure certain "news" items as pushed through. When little is happening, they flip over to click-bait income to send traffic to sites that pay for it, kind of like Digg before Rose fucked it all up.

    6. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, if Obama is serious about this he'd have some nerd in the administration who would know all about a non-locked in bot that can be used to print a copy of itself. Buy one for each school only and if they need another one and they can make their own. Hopefully he was only saying Makerbot because that's the name more people have heard of and so can relate to the concept a bit more easily. I would certainly think that a 3d printer for schools is more useful and less locked in than say, supplying iPads to kids in the hope they'd NOT use the devices to bully each other on Facebook and like, read research and stuff instead.

    7. Re:Can you guys get over your Makerbot obsession by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      The new SketchUp Make license is quite restrictive though --- no for-profit use, and any such usage requires payment of an annual license fee.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  6. Headline: Obama Puts Guns in Every School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what typical headlines say. But it is HIS media, so let's see what they really say.

    Headline: Obama Puts Toys in Every School

    2 years from now: Kindergarteners with iPads and Makerbots print porn!

    1. Re:Headline: Obama Puts Guns in Every School by sunking2 · · Score: 1

      It would have been much more clever had you tied your original headline to printable guns.

  7. Guns for Every Child! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's play Cowboys and Indians with real guns!

    Sometimes our President is not very bright.

    1. Re:Guns for Every Child! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's play Guy Fawkes with Nitrogen Tri-Iodide!

      Oh wait, we've been doing that in any school with a credible Chemistry curriculum since we started to make a distinction between alchemy and science. Sometimes our commenters display dismaying levels of stupid.

  8. As a mechanical engineer... by hubang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather see a shop class in every decent sized high school in the US. Equipped with manual milling machines and lathes. WAY more useful.

    1. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      Why not have a MakerBot, open sourced, also?

    2. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about auto repair? I think it's a good place to start with mechanical skills because everybody owns a car, and knowing some basics will save you money even if you don't choose to do much yourself, let alone be employed in the field. It exposes you to mechanical, electrical, and hydraulic systems, and some actual motivation to fabricate or recondition parts in a subsequent shop class.

    3. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by hubang · · Score: 1

      Auto shop is what got me into engineering!

    4. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up!!!!

      This is so true. I can't count the number of friends that I have that have no idea how to change a flat, check oil levels, check tire pressure or even add windshield washer fluid, or even change a burned out tail-light bulb."

      Their response is always, "I'll call AAA, the tires don't look flat, that's what the oil changes are for..."

    5. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!!!!

      This is so true. I can't count the number of friends that I have that have no idea how to change a flat, check oil levels, check tire pressure or even add windshield washer fluid, or even change a burned out tail-light bulb."

      Their response is always, "I'll call AAA, the tires don't look flat, that's what the oil changes are for..."

      There is a huge difference between learning those things in an educational setting, and giving a crap about actually doing any of them. None of the things you listed would be hard for a literate person without any past experience to figure out in a brief amount of time, considering the owner's manual details them nicely. Alas, the challenge is making the person _give a shit_ about how to change a tire or check the oil, when they can afford to pay someone else to do it so easily.

      Follow up: Do you know yourself and/or expect everyone else to know how to bake a good loaf of bread?

    6. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by hubang · · Score: 1

      What do the kids learn by pressing "print?"

    7. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a Physics teacher in an overcrowded high school, we ditched shop class a long time ago. I just want something that I can fit into a corner somewhere.

    8. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      How about auto repair? I think it's a good place to start with mechanical skills because everybody owns a car, and knowing some basics will save you money even if you don't choose to do much yourself, let alone be employed in the field. It exposes you to mechanical, electrical, and hydraulic systems, and some actual motivation to fabricate or recondition parts in a subsequent shop class.

      I get the impression that that would be frowned up on as a deviation from the 'if something scary or unexpected happens, your dealer is your only hope' trajectory that vehicle manufacturers seem hellbent on going down.

    9. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem with your follow up. It's midnight. You're 100 miles from anybody. Is there ever a time in this situation where you really need to know how to bake a loaf a bread? How about knowing how to change a flat?

    10. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This entire initiative, as great as it is, ignores a small problem: We aren't raising our children to be builders, we're raising them to be consumers. Consumers have no initiative, and see no point in things like shop class, or building things... afterall, isn't that why we import indians and chinese?

      Also, as soon as some high school student builds a gun with the 3D printer, that'll go away.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    11. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

      I don't recall that baking a loaf of will get someone out of immediate danger given that baking a loaf of bread takes quite a few hours. Most of that is you standing around waiting for it to either a. rise of b. bake in the oven. If you are waiting for either, you are most likely NOT in danger and are probably sitting on your couch watching TV or doing something else that is not as important as changing a flat tire on the side of the road.

      and yes I can bake a loaf of bread.

    12. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I went to High school (1995-97) we had a Machine Shop with Manual milling machines, surface grinders and lathes even one of these bad boys http://its.fvtc.edu/machshop1/drillpress/RadialDrlParts.htm that were all 1940's and 50's machine tools donated by Fairbanks Morse

      In the Cad Lab we had a Small CNC lathe and Mill

      Between the two one could pretty much make anything end result was we always had a good strong Vhechal in Challenge Wisconsin http://www.challengewisconsin.org/

    13. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Nah. I've heard this argument since I was a kid. Sure we are consumers, we are also producers. It is easier than ever to make things. There is a guide or place to ask how to make ANYTHING on the internet. If I am motivated to make or fix something on my own, I have the guidance to start at it immediately.

      And in terms of building this online on our computers, there are more tools than ever out there. With unity I can make a game quite easily, and if I don't want that much detail I can get things like gamemaker, or make a mod, or any number of frameworks that exist out there to assist.

      I enjoy making miniature terrain from time to time, and I'm only really into this because of finding some great websites with instructions on what materials to use and tips for building things.

      Look, people are lazy, we have always been lazy, very few people are doing productive things with their time 24x7 outside of their jobs, if that. That is nothing new. To boot, if we aren't being lazy and consuming, then the incentive for production is gone as well. The two things work in tandem with one another and just because companies are trying to entice us with advertising doesn't mean we have guns to our head and have no choice in the matter.

    14. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I see this all the time even on web boards.

      Q: "Do I really need to change my brake rotors with the pads? What's the allowable tolerance on the original thickness?"

      A: "Are you crazy! Your brakes are there to save your live, now you're going to skimp to save a few bucks!? Just take it in and quit endangering everybody!"

    15. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      On the plus side, people still get to ask that question. We've gotten to the point where it would be relatively inexpensive to 'chip' many of the major FRUs, printer cartridge style, to allow the car to grab a timestamp(and if it has OnStar or an equivalent, it'll be a good timestamp) when a new part is installed, impose time or milage based expiration/replacement intervals, and reject 3rd party components that don't fully implement the authentication system... That would be fun.

    16. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah. I've heard this argument since I was a kid.

      The reason it has been around so long, perhaps is an indicator it has merit.

      Sure we are consumers, we are also producers.

      Find me something within arm's reach that has Made In America on it. Chances are, there isn't one; And odds are very, very good, it won't be one of the first five things you grab.

      It is easier than ever to make things. There is a guide or place to ask how to make ANYTHING on the internet. If I am motivated to make or fix something on my own, I have the guidance to start at it immediately.

      I think I see a flaw in your cunning plan; You aren't motivated. You're just saying that if you were, then yeah, shit could happen. But it ain't happening... because you, like hundreds of millions of others, don't want to.

      Look, people are lazy, we have always been lazy, very few people are doing productive things with their time 24x7 outside of their jobs, if that. That is nothing new.

      Okay, hold on to that for a minute and then consider again the statement you're upset about: We're consumers, not builders.

      just because companies are trying to entice us with advertising doesn't mean we have guns to our head and have no choice in the matter.

      "guns to our head", phrase: It means "I am deeply conservative". Because really, you types are the only ones that ever think there's a gun to your head... and perhaps only a miniscule amount of guns have ever been put to the heads of anyone uttering this line. Basically, if you utter this phrase, I put you in the moron category and move on, because your arguments will invariably be bullshit propaganda, with a side of cognitive distortion, served on the silver platter of self-importance.

      Look... I just said we're creating a culture of consumers. That's why nobody wants to build anything; Instant gratification. Everybody's a winner. You can have it all! It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it. We're teaching our kids that you don't need to work hard to succeed -- you just need to open your mouth and let someone shove spoonfuls of product into it.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    17. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      MakerBot is the bottom end of 3D printers. Like an EZ-Bake oven compared to a microwave oven. If such printers are the wave of the future then reasonable tools should be introduced instead, like printers that can create something that looks and feels like a real product that are at least within the ballpark of traditional shop tools.

    18. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that is more useful. Don't you think we're moving towards additive machining rather than subtractive? The numbers of machinists have been dwindling steadily in the USA, both automotive and general. In the automotive case, centralized rebuilders have taken over most of the business. What would really be useful would be welding, but that's really fairly dangerous stuff and best kept in the colleges. I'm ambivalent about having machining in high schools for that reason as it is. Wood shop is a good balance between danger and usefulness. You can still build a lot of good, useful stuff out of wood. And as an added bonus, if you put the tooling into it a little too hard or deep, you have a much lesser risk of flying metal fragments.

      I think we're moving more towards a world where nothing is rebuilt when machining would be required, and instead it's recycled. Or if it does require rebuilding, it is always done centrally.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      There is now a sensor with a wireless link in each wheel hub in every new automobile. It measures tire air pressure and sends the status wirelessly to the car chassis computer. It spins round and round in the wheels. And it adds a significant amount to the cost of the car, and an even more significant amount to replacing the air stem in your car if it fails.

      Also, give me a fucking break.

    20. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about auto repair? I think it's a good place to start with mechanical skills because everybody owns a car

      Car ownership is dropping fast. The 18-30 generation has 28% fewer licensed drivers and 30% fewer own cars than a decade ago. Millenials are overwhelmingly more likely to consider owning a car to be a luxury than a necessity compared to previous generations did 15 or 30 years ago. You might as well teach kids how to shoe a horse for all the relevance it will hold in their lives.

      http://www.theatlanticcities.com/commute/2012/10/end-car-ownership-developed-world-least/3452/

    21. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by tibman · · Score: 2

      So where does Minecraft fit into that? They are consuming entertainment by "building" virtual structures.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    22. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. A Makerbot is a huge maintenance load. They need a lot of fiddling and constant maintenance and replacement parts that a school teacher isn't going to have time or money to do. These machines will sit in a corner collecting dust and frustration. Much like the one we have here, in an office full of engineers.

      I'd be fine with a shop class full of nothing but hand tools. Cheaper for the school, lower liability costs, and the students will learn the same set of problem solving and building skills. Johnathan Starr published an excellent book back in the 1970s about the program he ran.

    23. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by foobar+bazbot · · Score: 1

      Also, as soon as some high school student prints a gun with the 3D printer, that'll go away.

      Yes, just like metal shop went away because students built zip guns (and some "real", if primitive, guns)? Oh, wait, that happened, but high school metal shop only (mostly) went away once, as a culture, we decided that being a pencil-pushing office drone is generally a desirable job, but the dirty work of manufacturing products is an undesirable job. Nobody in rich school districts wants the school to waste Johnny's time teaching him to work with his hands when he'll never need that (we know he'll have a better career than that), and poor districts don't have funds for a shop if they wanted it.

      Yeah, some kids will get hold of the liberator (or some descendant or alternative design) STL files and sneak one through. But being kids trying to build a gun in shop class, rather than attention-seeking activists, they'll try not to get caught, so I think we have a while before such a build is both sufficiently (1) well-documented and (2) consequence-laden (ideally: the gun blows up during test-firing and hurts an innocent bystander with no (documented) connection to the gun build -- second-best: the gun works as designed and is used in a crime) to make that hype-dripping news story needed; I think it's likely to go away due to 3D printers becoming more-or-less ubiquituous in homes and therefore boring before that happens.

    24. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      My owners manual is on a Computer DVD you insensitive clod! How will that help me when I'm on the side of the highway with no computer?

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    25. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Tweezak · · Score: 2

      Exactly my thoughts. I was so envious of my brother who went through school years ahead of me. He was able to take metal shop, learn to run a mill, lathe and to weld. By the time I got to high school the metal shop had been shuttered. I was still able to take auto mechanics for a couple semesters and got good at fixing cars. But I'd really love to learn how to weld properly. Yeah...a 3D printer will allow you to build plastic crap that will break and you'll have to make a new one - which fits our disposable mentality these days - but machining and welding allow you to make something robust that will last for years and can be repaired if it breaks.

      Quality is dead. Disposable is king.

    26. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      "The reason it has been around so long, perhaps is an indicator it has merit."
      No, that's an argumentum ad antiquitatem. Just because it is old does not mean it is good. The bible and its ideas are quite old and tenacious, but that does not necessarily mean they have any merit.

      Just wanted to point that out, and would like to indicate that if you google "how to win every argument", you'll end up with a PDF of a quite nice book detailing the argumentative fallacies.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    27. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a shop, and a well equipped home ec room. And these classes need to be just as important to graduation as english and math

      We need kids to grow up to be skilled laborers too. Plumbers, Electricians, Mechanics.

    28. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Your location and its culture had a lot to do with that. Many manual machine tools from the WWII era are still in use and making money, not least because they are irreplaceable nowadays in the larger sizes.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    29. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I enjoyed your rational ripostes until your irrational response to "guns to heads..." So many adjectives and a stark absence of counter-argument. Just food for thought.

      I like to use it when there really is the threat of violence from, say, the state, in stark contrast to voluntary relationships/free trade. Yes, even free trade with "evil monopolies".

    30. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, there were angle brackets filtered as bad HTML.

      s/"evil monopolies"/"evil {insert 'essential good or service' here} monopolies/'

    31. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see a shop class in every decent sized high school in the US. Equipped with manual milling machines and lathes. WAY more useful.

      I'd agree with that and you still get kids interested in becoming engineers, designers, and inventors.This statement ""3D printing is teaching them the skills they'll need as tomorrow's engineers, designers, and inventors"", is really overreaching and shows how far 3d printing companies are willing to go to push a bad product onto people.

      The BBC had a story where they investigated 3d Printing, and found there are far more failures and wasted material to finally get a "complete item". Shop class you have mistakes but they are from the person making them, and they can learn from hands on type learning, physically building something, instead of watching a printer create it, 3d printing is pretty interesting and there is more and more coming out over metal fab with it I think it is another tool like a hammer or saw, ect..

    32. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

      They learn little by pressing "print". However, if the school is teaching students how to create the models and all of the prerequisites leading up to that, then they learn a lot. Advanced classes can expand on that by allowing students to create new object solutions to problems they see.

      Oh, and the schools can possibly increase the use of manipulative models in their classrooms by printing them instead of purchasing them from someone else. This also allows teachers to more innovative by modifying the manipulative teaching aids and by creating new ones that may not even be available. As an example, a group of teachers could get together to recreate a miniature section of an ancient city, both in its current destroyed form and perhaps how it might have looked when new and whole. that is something that you don't just purchase from a catalog.

    33. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think it's more that we've spent all the years since WW2 telling kids that they should not do work that gets their hands dirty, that they need degrees and business suits, not tools and skills, that bluecollar jobs are beneath their dignity as a college graduate. So now we have two and three generations who have no idea how to build anything physical. *Naturally* they're consumers.

      We can live without accountants and programmers and car salesmen. We cannot live without carpenters and plumbers and mechanics and butchers and farmers.

      As to "Made in USA" you are right, it's difficult to find anything bearing that label. And I've become so disgusted with the quality of Chinese tools that now -- unless it's something I regard as disposable, if I can't find one made in a country with quality manufacturing, I do without. So, yeah, I do have Made in USA, Germany, Finland, and occasionally Taiwan (not at all the same as mainland China quality) in arm's reach. (Okay, the good scissors were made in Italy... somewhere upward of 60 years ago.)

      But in some areas, like consumer electronics and clothing, you no longer even have a choice. We just don't MAKE that kind of thing anymore, anywhere in the First World.

      We need more shop classes in high school, so kids who actually have the aptitude can learn these skills, and maybe discover they prefer it, and that it's perfectly good to make a living by making and fixing physical things, rather than just by pushing electrons around.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    34. Re:As a mechanical engineer... by readacc · · Score: 1

      You have an interesting point and I've been feeling the same way for some time. I've been feeling less and less satisfied with just consuming content that others have made and have been taking steps towards creating my own stuff. Right now that's just some hobby coding for a new project, but I have to say it's INCREDIBLY satisfying once you get going.

      But... as you said, you need to be motivated. The first step is finding out how to become motivated. Creating something requires far more effort than just consuming something made by someone else, and so it's hardly surprising we are a culture of consumers. Being the time-poor, tired, overworked people we are, there's little motivation at the end of the day to expend effort on a task that may or may not even produce something good at the end. In my case, the allure of gaming made working on my own projects not even an option, because it's easier to chill and play.

      However, even if my current project doesn't pan out, the journey is satisfying enough. And I think it's important to know that a balance can be achieved between creating and consuming. All-consuming, barely any creating (except perhaps the mandated stuff for work) eventually pushed me towards a better, healthier outcome.

  9. I had 10 math manipulatives in school by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    We were taught to use them regularly. If they didn't suit our needs we needed to do the rest in our head. They were portable, too; though not interchangeable with other sets. They also came at no cost to the school (though I did know some kids who had only 5, at no fault of their own).

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:I had 10 math manipulatives in school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 10?

      With hands and feet, you can use each hand for a number between zero and 31, and by sliding your fingers and adding with your toes when your right pinky matches up with a 1 on the other hand... you then have mastered your multiplication tables up to 31x31 without memorizing 961 things that a computer is better at.
      All that is left is some multiplying by 2 and conditional adding of 1 to get the result back into decimal for those poor souls that only have 5 manipulatives.

      My teachers always wondered why I wanted a few dozen pencils during tests involving numbers expressed in scientific notation.

  10. Makerbot Not For Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you think you can unpack a makerbot, press the button and start printing Eiffel towers, you need to get out more.
    It's definitely a DIY machine and produces more failures than successes.

    1. Re:Makerbot Not For Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're a Luddite. The other day I saw a story on Fark about 3D printing a Sega game controller. The 3D printed object looked just like the original part, well worth the 900$ for the 3D printer.

    2. Re:Makerbot Not For Kids by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There are high school programs that have 3D printers. The kids develop the skills over a number of years to do useful things with them. The 3D printer is one of the many carrots for learning the skills.

      Here is one area where a 3D printer can encourage students to learn a skill. Suppose that you were reverse engineering some object with many pieces Each student would have to measure and design a piece in the CAD software. Now, most students do not understand why good measurement is necessary, or why they need to make an effort to draw the object exactly, or how many measurements are really needed. So each student draws and the pieces are put together in the software, and adjustments are made because the pieces are not going to fit exactly. Eventually the group of students gets something that fits together in the software and prints. Inevitably one or two pieces are not going to fit together in the physical prototype, debugging will have to happen, and much learning will go on.

      The problem is that such a process is long, there are not many grades involved, and students who are not motivated and curios tend not to benefit very much. There has to be a reason to have a tool in the classroom, and a understanding of how it is going to be used. otherwise it will, like the laser printer, be used to print shoes.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Makerbot Not For Kids by fauxjargon · · Score: 1

      I think this is really the only case to be made for 3d printers / CNC in schools. If I ran a private school, there would be a class where students partnered up - each designs a simple project, produces shop drawings and hands it off to their partner, who makes their product and vice versa.

    4. Re:Makerbot Not For Kids by hypergreatthing · · Score: 2

      Do i think a kid can unpack a markerbot, download a design for Eiffel towers and start printing them immediately? yes.
      I would expect kids to do this and see how easy and powerful a tool it will be. Then ease them into making modifications and then designing their own inventions from scratch.

      It would be like woodshop 2.0, with less buzz saws.

    5. Re:Makerbot Not For Kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF a printer could output an object in say 30 min, and work every time i could see this being a good idea (makerbot in every school) But hoping that no one will touch the printer all day while it generates that Eiffel tower, or that it even makes it to the end on its own...

      Now, as a CEO, Bre is doing what he needs to for his company.. Even if misguided.

    6. Re:Makerbot Not For Kids by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      and students who are not motivated and curios

      Some of my classmates were curios.

      Sadly they got left on the shelf, except for one - he's in the cabinet.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Unfortunately... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

    For what cheap injection-molded shit sells for once it is a 'math manipulative, aligned with standards!', rather than a generic plastic toy, 3d printing them might actually save money.

    I was shocked the first time I idly leafed through an educational supply catalog.

  12. More things to break... by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2

    Film projectors that "stuttered"
    Paper printers that jammed, ran out of ink etc...
    Laptops that get dropped, crash etc..

    Nothing like putting something even more complex into a teacher's classroom for them to troubleshoot.

    Is 3D printing really going to help kids do math and read better? I don't recall PrintShop running on an Apple IIe making me a better reader, though I did crank out some banners...

    1. Re:More things to break... by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      So just because something might break means we shouldn't use it? I know that the use of different tools in woodshop gave me much more ways to work on my projects, and even broken parts gave insight into how they worked and how to repair them. For instance, film projectors stuttering is most often due to damaged film or faulty loop sizes.

  13. As a former teenager, I predict... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a glut in the high school supply of printed dildos and bongs. You heard it here first!

    1. Re:As a former teenager, I predict... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Guns.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:As a former teenager, I predict... by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      dildo gun bong.

    3. Re:As a former teenager, I predict... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That'll get banned three times over!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by mi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since 1962 the per-pupil costs of public schools has quadrupled (inlation-adjusted — the nominal increase is 25-times!), while the results remain just as — if not even more — disappointing. Indeed, merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading . Will a "makerbot" help solve this fundamental problem? Somehow I doubt it...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since 1962 the per-pupil costs of public schools has quadrupled (inlation-adjusted — the nominal increase is 25-times!), while the results remain just as — if not even more — disappointing. Indeed, merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading . Will a "makerbot" help solve this fundamental problem? Somehow I doubt it...

      What would that "fundamental problem" be exactly? That education outpaces inflation? It takes a very casual understanding of economics to know why this is happening. Can you figure it out? Here is a hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States#Over_time.2C_by_race_and_sex

      Cliffs in case you are still too dense: when the cost of the labor force enabling education in the US triples, you can expect the cost of providing the education to do the same (see: 1961 to 2004.) Still want to bicker about how education is too expensive? Clearly you know how expensive it is to be ignorant.

    2. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understand this...as someone who has taught K-16, I don't see faculty salaries increasing in *any* public institutions at *any* grade level. As programs and extra-curricular activities are getting cut all over the place, what is all that money going toward? (Hint: Bureaucracy!)

    3. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by mi · · Score: 2

      What would that "fundamental problem" be exactly?

      That increases in funding failed — for some reason — to improve education quality.

      when the cost of the labor force enabling education in the US triples

      The per-pupil costs not tripled, but quadrupled — and not all of those monies are spent on (the more expensive) labor...

      Clearly you know how expensive it is to be ignorant.

      Come, come — is not it customary to exclude present company in a polite argument?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would that "fundamental problem" be exactly?

      Gee I dont know maybe reading comprehension?

      Indeed, merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading

      Or did you just skim and saw 'quadrupled'?

      I was one of those 30%. I took it upon myself to be in the other 70%. Instead of teaching our children to learn. We teach them to remember. You need to remember things but knowledge is useless without the ability to use it.

      when the cost of the labor force enabling education in the US triples
      So we are at 1.25x then? Instead of 4x? So it costs 25% more with the exact same result.

      Clearly you know how expensive it is to be ignorant.
      Hey pot your black. You too kettle.

      I could see a makerbot being used extensively in a shop class type setting. But that would be about it. I am sure there are other uses. But I am falling a little short in seeing those that other methods do not already cover that cost wildly less. Yes cost is an issue when some teachers have to buy their own markers/chalk because the school board blew the budget on 'new' books 5 years in a row.

    5. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The money is going to new buildings and facilities. The local building contractors have a lot of clout with the school board, and they don't get to do nearly enough 'full price top-of-the-line' construction jobs for the private sector.

    6. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would that "fundamental problem" be exactly?

      Gee I dont know maybe reading comprehension?

      Indeed, merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading

      Or did you just skim and saw 'quadrupled'?

      Let's think critically, shall we? A catch-phrase like "merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading" is grabbing but he provides no evidence to suggest that this rate is higher or lower than it was 10 or 30 or 50 years ago. Indeed, it could be that the rate is getting _better_ (i am not saying it is, but the evidence presented here merely does not disprove it) but you jumped to the conclusion that this single unsubstantiated statistic is proof that the system is delivering less value that it was in the past.

      Heres a bonus, you can use the below site to see how this statisic looks over time (cliffs notes version: you may want to watch the snarky "pot and kettle" comeback next time you dumbass, reading comprehension scores have been steady for the past 40 years).
      http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/

    7. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would that "fundamental problem" be exactly?

      That increases in funding failed — for some reason — to improve education quality.

      when the cost of the labor force enabling education in the US triples

      The per-pupil costs not tripled, but quadrupled — and not all of those monies are spent on (the more expensive) labor...

      Clearly you know how expensive it is to be ignorant.

      Come, come — is not it customary to exclude present company in a polite argument?

      The time periods in which the data overlaps shows a tripling of each, if you took a second to actually compare the two. Certainly there is a lot of potential for improving education in the US, but a blanket assertion like "it is too expensive" despite the fact that there is actually an economic justification for it to be priced the way it is does nothing to further that goal. Also, see my other reply in this thread, reading comprehension scores in the US have *not changed much* in the past 40 years, so when you try to wave a statistic like "merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading" when that is actually the same rate it was back when education was "much less expensive" (by your standards) you don't really have a leg to stand on.

    8. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by mi · · Score: 1

      but a blanket assertion like "it is too expensive"

      I made no such assertions — my point was, adding more money did not help improve results.

      so when you try to wave a statistic like "merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading" when that is actually the same rate it was back when education was "much less expensive" (by your standards) you don't really have a leg to stand on.

      My leg is in that we got — by your own admission — the same (at best) results despite paying more for it. Thus, any increases in expenditures were money wasted and the original problem — whatever it was — had little-to-nothing to do with lack of funding.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    9. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by mi · · Score: 1

      Whatever the problem is, adding more money will not help solve it — that's the point... At best, things will stay the same (just at higher costs). At worst, the pie will become juicy enough to attract outright criminals...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    10. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Tweezak · · Score: 1

      Agreed...but apparently throwing iPads at the problem will fix it...or that's what many seem to think.

    11. Re:Another gizmo to be funded by taxpayers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but a blanket assertion like "it is too expensive"

      I made no such assertions — my point was, adding more money did not help improve results.

      so when you try to wave a statistic like "merely 30% of 8th-graders are deemed proficient in reading" when that is actually the same rate it was back when education was "much less expensive" (by your standards) you don't really have a leg to stand on.

      My leg is in that we got — by your own admission — the same (at best) results despite paying more for it. Thus, any increases in expenditures were money wasted and the original problem — whatever it was — had little-to-nothing to do with lack of funding.

      I admitted that the price went up, that we are paying more; i specifically repeated to you, twice now, that we are not paying *for* more and therefore any assertion that we should be disappointed because we are not getting more is totally unfounded. The distinction is important, you should check into that.

  15. idiotic when we have hungry students with no books by SuperBanana · · Score: 2

    Makerbot also launched a call for open models of math manipulatives on Thingiverse (you might remember them from elementary school) so that teachers have something useful to print immediately.

    Why are we encouraging schools to buy thousands of dollars in equipment (the 3D printer, the computer to drive it, the materials, etc - nevermind the teacher getting sent off to training seminars and whatnot) when we don't have enough textbooks for students, teachers for decades have been paying out-of-pocket for school supplies, and students are not performing well because they're hungry?

    We don't need 3D printers. We need paper, chalk, textbooks, and sandwiches.

  16. Fix parenting and the basics first by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Feed your kids breakfast. Teach them respect for authority. Remove shiny attention-span robbers from the house. Teach them to learn first. A Makerbot just throws money at it, layers more crap on top of a rocky foundation, and kicks the can of responsibility down the road.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Fix parenting and the basics first by fermion · · Score: 1

      I suppose if I had breakfast in school I might have been easier to handle, but I am was a stubborn child and night owl so I never wanted food before like 10am. Of course I watched too much tv and learned quite a bit from it, considering how put down it is. And don't get started on how I went to summer camp on a college campus at 11 where we put in front of teletype and taught to type in and compile basic programs because it was kind of cheaper babysitting for working parent. I mean that was awful for my future. Or learning how to type at 12 instead of endless math tutorials. Or the fact that my high school threw money away on a mainframe that we all learned Fortran when we were 14. I mean we could have been sitting there reading textbook, filling out worksheets, preparing for standardized tests, focusing on the fact that I did not always have all I wanted to eat. Instead I was learning how to draw, program computers, build things with tools. That you for reminding me how lucky I am to escape the education that everyone else seems to want.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:Fix parenting and the basics first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure your experience is the exception and not the rule. Perhaps it's where the money goes and not just how much is being spent. (i.e. the comment about costs quadrupling over time with no obvious improvement in educational results). If the money goes towards things like say, employing security guards and metal detectors at school entrances, and that school is comparitively underfunded to a potentially wealthier suburb, it sort of leaves not much money to have mainframes and bots and such.

  17. Re:idiotic when we have hungry students with no bo by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    We don't need 3D printers. We need paper, chalk, textbooks, and sandwiches.

    What an awful slogan. How about, "Markerboards, not Makerbots!"

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  18. Northen Venezuela ? by x0ra · · Score: 1

    What is the difference between Obama printing money to fill his socialist dreams, and Maduro sending armed troopers in electronic stores to lower prices a gun point to give every venezuelian a cheap 50" TV set ?

    1. Re:Northen Venezuela ? by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Venezuela is collapsing faster than America.

  19. This will end well... by mpaque · · Score: 1

    Great idea. Record sales and profits for Makerbot, and a broken-down dust catcher in the corner of every classroom. Meanwhile, the teachers will still be sending notes home at the beginning of each school year asking for donations of paper, pens and pencils, and other basic supplies.

    1. Re:This will end well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the supplies that could be made using the bot.....by the students learning to use them.

  20. Makerspaces by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    I think a makerspace in every school makes more sense. No, fossils, a makerspace is not the same thing as shop class. Teaching kids to code, work with CAD programs, and see the result print out on printers not only teaches STEM more effectively to the kids who are wired to like STEM anyway, but makes the process more accessible to kids who are, say, arty or sporty. So putting 3D printers like Fab@Home's would make more sense than MakerBot because it's more versatile, and gene-sequencing machines, centrifuges, autoclaves, and such for biohacking because future manufacturing could well be bio-based. CnC machines and lathes come into the mix as well. Lastly, dedicating a significant portion of instruction time to the makerspace rather than as an option for "kids who aren't nerdy" is the only way to cement America's place in the technological future.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
  21. kids are the same every generation... by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    plastic penises in every classroom!

    crap, I posted a obXKCD link. I feel dirty now.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  22. Such a waste of material and technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we really need to stuff feed our kids all these fancy toys, instead of proper training for teachers and students on how to think and how to perform basic but fundamental tasks?

    The proliferation of Googling in classrooms created kids that think research is about getting answers faster instead of coming up with their own answers. Guessing is less and less important since now answers are no longer blowing in the winds, they are flowing on the web. Something being correct could completely be based on "I googled it!". Those kids are like chickens on a farm getting all they need in a cage without ever step away from the computer. Don't tell me it's OK because we adults do this all the time -- do you let your kids watch (let along participate in) sex in action when they are young? Habits formed at younger age tend to have longer and more significant effects on their brains.

    What would having this kind of things in classrooms give us? I don't know. Maybe more tendency of not caring about things -- more of the throwing-away mentality, maybe? With a push of button, as long as I have the files, I will be able to get whatever I desire. Now the cage just get slightly smaller for those poor chickens.

    I don't know, it all seems to be the wrong priorities.

    1. Re:Such a waste of material and technology by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Replace "google" with "encyclopedia" and you take me back to my middle school days. Teachers say the same thing, fact is kids don't take certain things seriously till they get older, cause they are kids. I didn't, but do now that I'm older, yet I don't expect my perceived wisdom to suddenly transpose onto the generation behind me. They will be saying the same things about the generations behind them though.

      I do agree with you though, if there is one constant it is a teacher's inability to handle technology. If they couldn't get the film projectors or overheads to work, they certainly aren't getting a 3d printer going. Though I guess they could be a good addition to any wood/metal shop a school might have.

  23. Re:idiotic when we have hungry students with no bo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Luddite! You're just terrified and afraid of new technology, grandad! People will 3D print paper, chalk, textbooks and sandwiches! They'll just download them! Woooo! Technology!

  24. I'm impressed by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

    I'm extremely impressed that 3d printers will be seen as the economic boon they actually will be, instead of the Luddite approach of crying that it will kill thousands of manufacturing jobs - which it will, of course, but that doesn't mean at all that it will be a net economic negative.

    1. Re:I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see what manufacturing jobs it will kill, given that the toy 3D printers make trinkets and the high-end ones are so specialized they need an entire staff to run and they certainly are not meant to mass-manufacture anything. In any case, who makes the raw materials for 3D printers? Oh yeah, Luddites in gloomy old factories with their pre-3D machinery...

    2. Re:I'm impressed by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

      Well eventually, anything you need that's smaller than, say, a person, you could just print. Shoes, chairs, clothing, furniture with some assembly required, tools, etc. Maybe simple electronics? Depends how good the printers get. Everyone would print their own things individually. So manufacturing jobs that make those things will go down the drain. Of course you still need raw materials, those jobs would be safe.

  25. Step away from the CNC... by fauxjargon · · Score: 1

    Although the problems with closed-source Makerbot printers and proprietary software from Autodesk are standard /. fare, I think the real issue with the 3d printing hype is how disconnected people are from actually making things themselves without the use of CNC equipment. I think it's also why people are so obsessed with food, it is the only DIY thing most people do anymore.

  26. Better in a shop department anyway by ron_ivi · · Score: 1

    I worry about the fumes of a makerbot in the poorly ventilated classrooms in many schools.

    At least if they put the 3D-printers in a shop class, they surely have better airflow.

    1. Re:Better in a shop department anyway by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Filtration would be pretty trivial, at least if the patents on having an enclosed fabrication surface have expired...

  27. The future, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3D Printers are the future.

    I just got two Wifi parabolic reflectors made to order. $6.50 at the local library.

    1. Re:The future, by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Plastic reflectors?

    2. Re:The future, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With reflective coating? I don't even know what a "wi-fi parabolic reflector" is supposed to be, how much are they on eBay? Are you sure the ones you got even work?

      http://www.ebay.com/itm/Long-Range-WiFi-Signal-Collector-Parabolic-Antenna-DIsh-Reflector-Portable-Unit-/271233047826?pt=US_Networking_Boosters_Extenders_Antennas&hash=item3f26bfdd12

      No way you 3D printed anything like that at a library for 6$ you liar. You, at best, 3D printed a gizmo to HOLD a parabolic reflector. Liar.

    3. Re:The future, by foobar+bazbot · · Score: 1

      I'd guess he got a plastic framework to establish correct parabolic figure and a correctly-positioned mounting point to locate the feed antenna at the focus, and then covered it with metal foil, mesh, or wires for reflectivity.

  28. I Really Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really like the way you used the pejorative phrase "inspired a spate of buzzkill blog posts" to describe fact and reality. Let me guess, you're one of these hopey changey types that thinks that if we just think positive thoughts then they alone will change the reality of the situation?

    Reporting facts and stating obvious reality is not a buzzkill, unless it is an idiot that is buzzing in a fantasy world.

  29. Toxic Emmissions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't want a makerbot in a classroom, unless it was placed in an active ventilation container. There have been numerous articles regarding the toxic emissions that 3D printers put out when the plastic is melted. Not safe.

  30. This won't last long... by Kaenneth · · Score: 2

    Just wait until a kid prints a gun at school...

    1. Re:This won't last long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or learns how to use it to pimp their own rides instead of turning to drug dealing (and needing guns) to pay for sick rims.

  31. About as successful by Saethan · · Score: 1

    This'll be about as successful as getting a laptop to every student. Now, 3D printers in, say, shop class in middle/high school? Much more reasonable.

  32. Who will teach them? by morgauxo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My high school had a 1 million dollar computer lab gifted to it. That was quite a bit in 1990s money considering that I had a graduating class of under 40! The problem was that the only teacher who knew anything about computers was the band teacher. He was good, don't get me wrong but his musical love/responsiblities came first and he didn't really have time to teach computer class. After he struggled to fit in a programming class for 1 semester he realized he couldn't do it. After that about the most advanced thing in the room was Mavis Beacon Teaches Typing!

    Maybe school teachers are more techically proficient today? I doubt it! Even if they are.. with all the finiky settings that go into getting a 3d printer to work right, and all the failure prone parts that go into one... I don't see how this can possibly work!

    1. Re:Who will teach them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, had an expensive computer lab in elementary and high school.

      In elementary school, I learned a spectacular amount about the computers. How to fix them, and I spent hours writing little logic scripts that would draw pic's or do math homework (and show work!).

      In high school, after my first programming class, the teacher made a special request to let me swap one of the home skills classes, to take a 2nd level (advanced) programming class. Somewhat self-directed. :) He gave me some work, and left me to go. A couple months in, another teacher saw me working, and complained I was "playing games" so my teacher stopped by to check my work (assignments like "make a function" "make a function that returns a float" etc)...while I was trying to find the saved work (all done the first day) he saw some other things listed...

      Him: "What's that?" Me: "Nothing important, just a second, the assignments are here somewhere..." Him (suspicious): "No, show me and explain, now."

      Me (very worried - these weren't my assignments): "Well, this one makes a random mess on the screen, then I mark off and area using the mouse, and I experimented with area capture and image compression. I wasn't very good at the compression." "This program, I was trying to write my first 3-D spinning cube, but I'm still trying to figure out some details." "This one, I was playing with interrupts" ....

      And he didn't want to see the assignments after all. Did ask to keep a copy of my work. The he explained about the other teacher, and laughed. He figure the teacher probably saw the image capture program when I was testing.

      So yeah, I learned a lot and developed a love of programming. And I have a number of friends who went through the same thing at my schools.

  33. Someone still has to design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point isn't to teach them how to print as much as it is to teach them how to design.

    But, I'm guessing you already knew that.

    1. Re:Someone still has to design by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      The country is increasingly filled with parking lots laid out by people who 'know how to design.' That is: parking lots where it's a fricking nightmare to park your car because you have to navigate in and around all the islands and berms that probably looked so nice on the layout screen of the CAD program. The whole world is turning grotesquely baroque (please forgive the redundancy) because we have generations of empowered 'designers' who didn't have to do the low level work of implementing anything.

    2. Re:Someone still has to design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly a lot of websites have designers or 'tech teams' that obviously don't use the product. Also happens with parking lots, widgets, and whatever idiot invented the DC Jewel Case with center 'flower' holder that likes to break. Of course, with websites, the tech department has to keep coming up with 'upgrades' that justify their existence. (Ebay is a prime example; between around 2005-2010 they kept upgrading, that now in order to list something for sale it takes 20 minutes, and even someone with lots of experience, still makes errors, like including small box pre-paid priority shipping on a telescope that don't fit.)
      The general idea of Universal Design addresses some of this issue, although focused on useabilty by the elderly or disabled.

    3. Re:Someone still has to design by tibman · · Score: 1

      Is that worse than the world where parts aren't interchangeable because they've all been hand-crafted?

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    4. Re:Someone still has to design by aztracker1 · · Score: 2

      Funny, I was thinking parking lots were a nightmare, because they were designed by people who live in areas where the Prius is considered a "large car" and they parking lot is in Phoenix, Arizona where nearly half of all vehicles on the road are full-size pickup trucks.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    5. Re:Someone still has to design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the 'reason' these 'bad' designs of parking lots (etc) are made that way ? ? ?

      99.99999% of the time, it is to 'save money' (for who? for the developer, jumbo dumbo): they will use THE ABSOLUTE MINIMUM of acceptable turning radii, lane widths, island widths, vegetation, etc, etc, etc...

      EVERYTHING is done to the lowest common denominator, NOT because the engineer/designer might not have wanted to 'do better', but because the developer was maximizing EVERY SQUARE INCH of property, and wasn't going to 'waste it' on making a 30' radius which made a comfortable turn, but kept to the minimal, code-compliant 25' radius, etc, etc, etc ON EVERY SINGLE ASPECT, from parking space dimensions, to signage, to lighting, to drainage, etc...

      it is ONLY done 'humanly' (if not humanely) to the extent that code requirements *force* them to accommodate human beings, otherwise, they would backfill playgrounds with broken glass if it made a profit...

      loss of tribe: people don't care what happens to 'the other', and EVERYONE becomes 'the other'...

    6. Re:Someone still has to design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should find some other way to compensate for having a tiny dick?

  34. Re:idiotic when we have hungry students with no bo by quintessentialk · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't say 'idiotic' -- I believe you don't need to fix all the problems in the world before you're allowed to do new things. That said, I come from a family of teachers, and that insight leads me to agree with you. I'm especially offended by teachers buying school supplies out of pocket. If I, an employee of a large organization, had to buy office supplies out of pocket, I'd assume the company was on its way down the toilet or at the very least had major management problems. Teachers are somehow conditioned to think having to buy supplies for your classroom and your students/customers is o.k... or they have too much empathy. Again, there's no reason you can't have both makerbots AND fix these problems, but my experience is that investment from technical companies and press celebrate enrichment in either a few affluent schools or in the one poor school that has the luck of being the example case. Meanwhile, there are plenty of schools remaining without enough pens and paper, let alone current generation computers, ipads, makerbots, etc....

  35. The "hype" of 3D printing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, scoff all you want, but here at the UW we can now use 3D printers to literally print compostable objects using the same "plastic" we use to make forks and spoons and plates from that are compostable - to grow more food.

    Think about it.

    Reusable chairs and tables that can be composted. Fashion footwear you can throw in the yard waste bin to be turned back into food when they're out of fashion.

    You really don't get it, do you.

    (follow the UW links for Sustainable products at green.washington.edu if you don't get that)

    The Green Revolution 3 is here. And it's happening whether you want it to or not.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reusable chairs and tables that can be composted. Fashion footwear you can throw in the yard waste bin to be turned back into food when they're out of fashion.

      Tables and chairs should last just about forever. Creating a disposable version of what should be a durable item just because you can dispose of it "responsibly" is nonsense.

      "Fashion" anything is part of the problem, and enabling it is not the solution.

    2. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Tables and chairs should last just about forever. Creating a disposable version of what should be a durable item just because you can dispose of it "responsibly" is nonsense.

      "Fashion" anything is part of the problem, and enabling it is not the solution.

      See, this is where you let the Perfect be the enemy of the Good.

      Should does not mean will.

      People do certain things. They make stupid beer steins and telephones out of football helmets. They wear one use only dresses for weddings.

      Making those easy to compost and use to grow more food means it doesn't go in a landfill to pollute more, it gets recycled into something useful when they finally clean house.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recycling will never keep up with the amount if trash people create, especially if you make trash creation easy and further encourage it with "compostable!" greenwashing.

      You can't do right doing wrong.

    4. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Think about what I said.

      It's reduce reuse recycle. This makes it reduce reuse recycle compost.

      Again, the Perfect getting in the way of the Good. Most actual waste is pre-consumer, not post-consumer. The waste from making this is ... compostable ... for food.

      (stares at person not getting chemical cycling, or distribution energy/material costs, or display space heat/cooling costs)

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    5. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      Hate to say it, but composting 3d printed materials is every bit as likely as biodegrading biodegradable plastic bags. Not every home (or apartment complex) has a composing unit, nor a use for the final product.

      This leaves two options: ship the 3d printed refuse where it can be used, or throw it in the general trash cycle. Until it becomes ubiquitous, it won't get shipped commercially (IE with "recyclable" items.

      If you can't get folks to "properly dispose" of batteries or fluorescent bulbs or electronics, you won't get folks to compost 3d printed refuse.

    6. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Oh please, it's not hard to set up a composting bin. In fact, there are 3D printer plans if you can't figure it out yourself.

      Although worms do help.

      Again, you're just arguing because you don't like change that isn't "perfect".

      The world is a messy place. Get used to it.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    7. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, it's not hard to set up a composting bin.

      If so, why is that almost nobody does it? And given that fact, what makes you think that leveraging its dismal adoption is the route to success for 3D printing?

      The problem with your pitch is that you start out by touting the ability to 3D print compostable versions of things that either should not be disposable at all, or should not exist, period.

      The only thing I throw away on a regular or even semi-regular basis that are not already compostable are glass and plastic food containers. Perhaps these could be manufactured from compostable materials, but I certainly have no need to do so myself.

      I'm not making mountains of trash out of pointless knick-knacks and trendy fashions -- are you? Should I or anyone else be encouraged to adopt or continue wasteful habits because the technology fairy is going to come along and turn that trash into organic carrots?

    8. Re:The "hype" of 3D printing? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      why? because you're lazy.

      Now go away. The world is changing whether you want it to or not.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. Kids and printers by phorm · · Score: 1

    Given my experiences with regular printers in High Schools, (tracking down some random student who had printed a few dozen pages of profanity to a shared printer), I'd imagine there will be a proliferation of many "interesting" phallic-shared objects coming through these printers...

  37. A **teacher** in every classroom by globaljustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's start by getting proper pay for and hiring more teachers.

    These fabricator things can be a great learning tool **For a quaified teacher to use**....it's not really on the radar for most schools right now.

    Most schools are busy figuring out which teachers to lay off b/c of unnecessary budget cuts.

    To the point above about "makerbots"

    It is definitely hype. It's embarassing b/c essentially its the same thing as that plastic mold machine at tourist attractions that can make you a plastic souvenier of the Washington Monument.

    Fabricator technology has improved greatly, but only in the commercial/industrial usage areas.

    It **will** eventually reach the consumer level but now it is far,, far from it.

    I **hate** tech hype! Wastes BILLIONS.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:A **teacher** in every classroom by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2

      It's embarassing b/c essentially its the same thing as that plastic mold machine at tourist attractions that can make you a plastic souvenier of the Washington Monument.

      At least those "mold-a-rama" machines demonstrate real-world manufacturing techniques. There are a hell of a lot more injection molding machines out there cranking out parts than there are 3D printers, that's for sure.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    2. Re:A **teacher** in every classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True but.... Some prospective (future aware) thinking in educational planning is also lacking. Hence why they think "cut now" and not worry about "idiocracy later" Hype yes, will it happen, probably not. On the other hand if it spurs some creative thinking that leads to actually sensible planning in education then whats the harm?

    3. Re:A **teacher** in every classroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Proper pay" is a euphemism for positive rights (i.e. union privileges). These disgusting hypocrites hold our children ransom while simultaneously claiming to protect them.

      Maybe the machines can print a 3D teacher who gives a shit.

  38. Like AAA vs dependent on AAA ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    I can't count the number of friends that I have that have no idea how to change a flat, check oil levels, check tire pressure or even add windshield washer fluid, or even change a burned out tail-light bulb." Their response is always, "I'll call AAA, the tires don't look flat, that's what the oil changes are for..."

    When I asked my parents to sign an application for a learner's permit they told me they would be happy to do so after I demonstrated that I could check tire pressure, add air and change a tire; check and add oil, radiator fluid and wiper fluid. Later my Dad made me learn to drive a manual transmission. My regular car while learning was an automatic and I tested in this car but my Dad had me drive a manual a little bit too. He didn't recommend getting manual, he just thought I should know how to drive one just in case.

    My parents liked AAA but they didn't believe in being dependent upon it. That AAA should be more of a convenience and not a necessity.

  39. TMI man, TMI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    many "interesting" phallic-shared objects coming

    That's a hell of a Freudian slip there phorm.

  40. Or a bong, or a dildo, or... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    anything else that might offend somebody....

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  41. Re:idiotic when we have hungry students with no bo by akvalentine · · Score: 1

    Use the 3D printer to print the paper, chalk, textbooks and sandwiches. Duh!

  42. Fact Checking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your first link refers to the U.S. Department of education which began operation in 1980.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Education

    Missing from the data are the years 1962-1970. If you compare the second entry in the table, 1970-1971, to the last, 2008-2009, the claim falls from "quadrupled" to "doubled".

    Watch a game show from the 1960s or 1970s and you will begin to realize that the price of everything has gone way up. nothing to see here.

    The second link fails to define "proficient", which is actually a moving target. There are ridiculous claims made all the time. For instance:

    "A report recently published by Harvard University's Program on Education Policy and Governance found that students in Latvia, Chile and Brazil are making gains in academics three times faster than American students," - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/us-students-still-lag-beh_n_1695516.html

    Fails to mention the starting and ending points of these students, or how they were able to make an apples-to-apples comparison. You may learn something from this Monty Python sketch:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhtfizONYOc

    The reality is that you are fishing for blurbs to support your paradigm instead of taking the time to understand a complex reality.

  43. More Makerbot/Thingiverse caveats by J'raxis · · Score: 1

    Makerbot/Thingiverse also deletes designs for products they don't like, so they can go to hell. Of course, their behavior resulted in an all-too-predictable Streisand effect, so it was actually quite beneficial in a strange way, but that doesn't change my opinion of them.

  44. Why waste time? by koan · · Score: 1

    If Obama thinks it's a good idea then it's pretty clear from experience that it is *not* a good idea.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  45. Track record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makerbot's track record looks pretty bad so far: http://makezine.com/review/make-ultimate-guide-to-3d-printing/replicator-2/#comment-1778498

  46. proper = market by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    "Proper pay" is a euphemism for positive rights (i.e. union privileges).

    I don't know where the hell you are from, but here, in **America** its the FREE MARKET

    If teachers were paid their true free market value, educators would be on the same level as doctors and lawyers.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  47. Tea, Earl Grey, hot by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    When that happens you can come back in your time machine and laugh at us. Maybe you could bring me a perpetuum mobile as gift to soften the blow. I'm sure they'll have them figured out by then.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Tea, Earl Grey, hot by Laxori666 · · Score: 1

      It's not really that far away. There is already technology to literally take a relatively small object, scan it, and then reproduce it exactly. Sure it's expensive as hell and really unwieldy at the moment, but technology always gets way cheaper over time.

  48. What about all the nanoparticles in the air by ntshma · · Score: 0

    caused by these things? I'm not sure I would want my kids around that. Or are they planning to completely enclose the device and filter the air after the build is complete?

  49. Theyr'e gonna rule the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new Makerbot overlords.

  50. Why though... by Jmac217 · · Score: 1

    It's way too soon for these to matter. Maker Bots are still in a very early stage. Using them for this application now will do no good. Waste of money, time, and effort.