Slashdot Mirror


US Wary of Allowing Russian Electronic Monitoring Stations Inside US

cold fjord writes "The New York Times reports, '... the next potential threat from Russia may not come from a nefarious cyberweapon or secrets gleaned from Snowden. Instead, this menace may come in the form of a ... dome-topped antenna perched atop an electronics-packed building surrounded by a security fence somewhere in the United States. ... the Central Intelligence Agency and the Pentagon have been quietly waging a campaign to stop the State Department from allowing ... the Russian space agency, to build about half a dozen ... monitor stations, on United States soil ... These monitor stations, the Russians contend, would significantly improve the accuracy and reliability of Moscow's version of the Global Positioning System ... The Russian effort is part of a larger global race by several countries ... to perfect their own global positioning systems and challenge the dominance of the American GPS. For the State Department, permitting Russia to build the stations would help mend the Obama administration's relationship with the government of President Vladimir V. Putin ... But the C.I.A. and other American spy agencies, as well as the Pentagon, suspect that the monitor stations would give the Russians a foothold on American territory that would sharpen the accuracy of Moscow's satellite-steered weapons. The stations, they believe, could also give the Russians an opening to snoop on the United States within its borders. ... administration officials have delayed a final decision until the Russians provide more information and until the American agencies sort out their differences.'"

33 of 232 comments (clear)

  1. Doomsday device! by kdawson+(3715) · · Score: 5, Funny

    It must be a doomsday device. There were those of us who fought against it, but in the end we could not keep up with the expense involved in the arms race, the space race, and the peace race. At the same time our people grumbled for more nylons and washing machines. Our doomsday scheme cost us just a small fraction of what we had been spending on defense in a single year. The deciding factor was when we learned that your country was working along similar lines, and we were afraid of a doomsday gap.

    1. Re:Doomsday device! by pesho · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Nah, the way it looks the C.I.A. and other American spy agencies, as well as the Pentagon have gone like:

      I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

      Now here is the scary part: Dr Strangelove is still as relevant as it was when it was made. You would think by now it would just be funny, and not scarily funny.

    2. Re:Doomsday device! by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I can't believe this is being seriously considred..?!?!

      WTF is in charge of the US with respect to these things?

      Are we allowed to put these same type of things on Russian soil too?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Doomsday device! by icebike · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't believe this is being seriously considred..?!?!

      WTF is in charge of the US with respect to these things?

      Are we allowed to put these same type of things on Russian soil too?

      The US has the same types of facilities in lots of different places, but not in Russia.
      The flight paths of the satellites are tracked by dedicated U.S. Air Force monitoring stations in Hawaii, Kwajalein Atoll, Ascension Island, Diego Garcia, Colorado Springs, Colorado and Cape Canaveral, along with shared NGA monitor stations operated in England, Argentina, Ecuador, Bahrain, Australia and Washington DC

      These stations provide correction to the satellites, (internal clocks and ephemeris data) as each passes overhead, and thereby improves the accuracy.

      Having them on US Soil isn't as bad as you might think. It subjects them to US control, Monitoring, and even taking them down should the situation warrant. It also makes GLONASS more useful/accurate in the US. (Many mobile phones can use GLONASS today). No way would the Russian's be allowed to put up a black-box installation. We would insist on knowing everything about what is going on in there).

      If you have a cold war outlook on Russia, just remember the old adage of keeping your Friends close and your Enemies closer.

      It seems unnecessary if you ask me. But then Russia doesn't have that many friends or wide spread bases for this type of installation in the western hemisphere these days. Cuba, and maybe one or two central american countries might be willing.

      It also seems odd, that the CIA would let Obama would hand this to the Russians just to prop up his image. They probably have enough goods on him to prevent it. I doubt the American people would stand for it anyway, and Obama would be forced to tuck tail and run away from it.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  2. Slashdot Summaries, by William Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somewhere in the United States (dramatic pause)
    the Central Intelligence Agency and the Pentagon (dramatic pause)
    have been quietly waging a campaign (dramatic pause)
    to stop the State Department from allowing (dramatic pause)

    I can't be the only person who is getting this out of the overuse of ... in the summary.

    1. Re:Slashdot Summaries, by William Shatner by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is more conventionally done with [...] rather than ... alone, which has the more usual meaning of a pause.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  3. Ellipsis mayhem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... If... you use an Ellipsis... frequently and... hastily people will think... you are William Shatner...

    KAHN!

  4. Easily dealt with. by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "But the C.I.A. and other American spy agencies, as well as the Pentagon, suspect that the monitor stations would give the Russians a foothold on American territory that would sharpen the accuracy of Moscow's satellite-steered weapons"

    Begging the question "aren't current nukes sufficiently accurate"?

    The smart countermeasure would be to monitor the monitoring stations and be ready to destroy them at no notice. Have both HERF/jamming and explosive capability available.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:Easily dealt with. by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Begging the question "aren't current nukes sufficiently accurate"?

      Depends on the application and the size of the nuke. One of the reasons that Soviet missiles and warheads were so big was because thy lacked accuracy. Against a hardened target that can be important even for a nuke. More accurate nukes can be smaller. Smaller nukes let your missiles carry more of them, and they can be fitted on smaller missiles.

      The smart countermeasure would be to monitor the monitoring stations and be ready to destroy them at no notice.

      If a nuclear strike is launched the system would only really need to provide high accuracy for about 30 minutes. I doubt there is enough drift in that time to make blowing the stations worthwhile. (And who would want to be on the demo team that had a 15 minute notice, at most, for blowing up the station on order, 24x7x365?) If you still wanted to blow up the stations in the event of an attack, you would probably have to do it within 10 minutes of the alert to make it worthwhile. If it turns out the alert was a false one and you blew up the stations, and no doubt killed the Russian operators, the Russians would be very cranky. It might even start a real war.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Easily dealt with. by ebno-10db · · Score: 2

      "aren't current nukes sufficiently accurate"?

      This is pretty much a non-issue for ballistic missiles, since they rely on inertial nav. If nothing else the ionization during re-entry prevents reception of radio signals. GPS may also not have sufficient dynamic capability (there's a tradeoff between how rapid GPS position updates are and how accurate they are). Maybe GPS would have some value in allowing ballistic missile subs to re-cal their inertial nav at sea, but that's about it.

      Using GPS/GLONASS for more conventional weapons (e.g. cruise missiles, PGM's, planes, etc.) is another story. Many rely on GPS/GLONASS. The US DoD reserves the ability to screw up GPS accuracy in certain parts of the world to foil enemy use of GPS, so they don't like the idea of anyone else implementing a system as good as GPS.

    3. Re:Easily dealt with. by MooseTick · · Score: 2

      Isn't it likely that the Russians or whomever could turn on a homing beacon wherever they plan to launch missles. This beacon could have been set up decades ago in a residential area and be all readly to go at the flip of a switch. There is no way the US could detect this and shut it down within a 30 minute time frame. The Russians could even have 5-10 in high value target areas like DC or NYC. That's what I would have put in place well before GPS was available.

  5. Allow it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We need the jobs assholes!

    Our economy is in shambles and these morons are worried about the Russians listening in - on what? Talk Radio?!

    Police chatter?

  6. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by swb · · Score: 2

    I think I read in the NY Times that the US does not have any GPS ground stations in Russia. If we did, it would be a hard thing to say no to.

  7. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by cold+fjord · · Score: 5, Informative

    No it doesn't. If you bother to read the story it states, "The United States has stations around the world, but none in Russia."

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  8. Re:No shit by bobbied · · Score: 2

    This was my reaction too. Allow you to monitor and refine your version of GPS so you can more easily and accurately target their weapons which may be pointed in my direction? Um.. No, not in my back yard. Also, I would fear that these systems would be used to collect intelligence. So, no again.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  9. The US does not have any stations in Russia by thesandbender · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or any of the former satellites of the CCCP for that matter. The authoritative list is here.

    1. Re:The US does not have any stations in Russia by monkeyFuzz · · Score: 2

      Or any of the former satellites of the CCCP for that matter. The authoritative list is here.

      On that list was a station out in the middle of the Indian Ocean that caught my eye - Diego Garcia, and how it was depopulated by the British to enable the US to set up shop for military purposes. The following cable and corresponding wikipedia article was quite an interesting read on yet another hegemonic adventure undertaken by the US govt. I wonder how long before the European Court of Human Rights will take to decide the case. Odds anyone for the outcome?

  10. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by bigwheel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the US ground station map. http://www.gps.gov/systems/gps/control/ Nothing in Russia.

    Can't the Russians just put theirs in Cuba?

  11. Many smartphones use both Glonass and US GPS by mspohr · · Score: 5, Informative

    One interesting thing I learned from the article is that many (?most) current smartphones use both Glonass and the US GPS system for position fixes.
    One motivation for this is the Russian requirement which heavily taxes devices which don't support Glonass. Apparently the iPhone 4S started support and many others also added support.
    I guess it's good to have two systems (with a possible third with the EU system). This can provide redundancy and improve reliability. Of course these are useful tools for warfare which is why we have several systems ("We've always been at war with Eastasia").

    --
    I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    1. Re:Many smartphones use both Glonass and US GPS by the_other_chewey · · Score: 3, Informative

      One interesting thing I learned from the article is that many (?most) current smartphones use both Glonass and the US GPS system for position fixes.

      Indeed. Allegedly, my VZW Droid 4 can grok Glonass.

      I have no idea if it actually works -- if there's an app for that, I haven't seen it.

      This one can differentiate between Navstar (GPS's actual name, it is only a GPS)
      and GLONASS: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.eclipsim.gpsstatus2

      Round sats in the status display are Navstar, square ones (satellite numbers 80+) are GLONASS.
      Note that most GLONASS-capable phones will only switch it on if Navstar reception alone is weak
      and/or unreliable, because it involves additional cirquitry and therefore reduces battery life. So if you
      have excellent reception, you might not see any "squares" even with GLONASS-capable hardware.

  12. If we're not doing anything wrong... by NReitzel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, the Russians want to monitor stuff inside the US borders. Ok, so what?

    To flip what we've heard from the NSA around, "If we're not doing anything wrong, we don't have to worry."

    In point of fact, letting the Russians monitor internal military chatter sounds like a good idea to me. That way, they -know- we aren't planning on attacking them. And.. by the way, we -aren't- planning on attacking the Russians, are we? If we are, _I_ would like to know about it, forget what the Russians know.

    The days of Red Baiting should be over. We should have an open society, and if the Russians want to eavesdrop, more power to them. Truthfully, I'm a lot more worried about what our own government wants to keep track of than I am about what any Russians (or Chinese) want to track. And if it improves the accuracy of their weapons, does that mean that they're more likely to blow up a military base than the local YMCA? That's good, isn't it?

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    1. Re:If we're not doing anything wrong... by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "we -aren't- planning on attacking the Russians, are we?"
      Of course we are. Just like we have plans for 100's of military moves. Whether or not we implement those plans is another question.

      "The days of Red Baiting should be over"
      Putin is doing his best to bring it back. His moves really seem to be to bring back a single power* and muscle his way around. He's entrenching a theocracy, arresting minor dissenter, and undoing all the democratic gain over the last 30 years. His moving to control certain oil interests

      errr. I didn't' want to imply it was the same single power, just a centralized power.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  13. What's the big deal? by laird · · Score: 2

    What's the big deal? The Russians have had a monitoring station in the US for decades. Specifically, there's a spot in the middle of the US that has line-of-sight to all satellites that carry phone calls in/out of the US. And there are three trailers there, one run by the NSA (remember, it was clearly illegal until quite recently, for the US to tapping all calls into and out of the US, which is what they've been doing for decades, though a shell corporation), one that operates for the Russians, and the third a private US corporation that captures and sells data as a business. I've been told (can't say by who) that they know about each other, and aren't even located far from each other.

  14. Obama should put this off for now by EmagGeek · · Score: 2

    He'll have more flexibility after the next election.

  15. Yawn by benjfowler · · Score: 2

    Putin and his nationalist thug buddies are just reaching for another opportunity to turkey-slap the West in the wake of the West's embarrassment after Ed Snowden's Guardian bum-buddies' appalling act of political sabotage. Putin has been handed a massive propaganda coup and is milking it for all its worth.

    It's a deliberate, calculated insult, given that the US has no GPS ground stations on Russian soil, and have no prospect of building any.

    The Kremlin will be quietly TTFO and that'll be the end of it. Hopefully a non-story.

  16. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by Xest · · Score: 2

    But only countries like Russia and China spy on people and hack. American agencies would never ever do that.

  17. Something new from cold fjord by ebno-10db · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Something new from cold fjord - a story/concern that most Slashdotters agree with. Cold (if I may presume to use your first name), I think this demonstrates that most Slashdotters are not naive fools who think we live in a completely friendly world. Rather, if I may speak for most others, we think many of the tactics used in fighting terrorism are overly intrusive (and sometimes downright un-Constitutional), dangerous to our freedom, and either marginally or completely ineffective. For example, 9/11 could have been prevented with old-fashioned police work. For example, FBI headquarters listening to a report from a field office, which in turn they were given by an astute flight instructor, of some gentlemen who wanted to learn to fly but didn't care about takeoffs and landings (at least not of the preferred variety).

  18. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do we really need a Cuban Cartography Crisis?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  19. Re:Why did they ask? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What prevents them from sticking 5 RF receivers in each of the russian consulates. Or indeed, paying for a couple of dozen boxes on roofs in the USA hooked to an internet connection.

    Roofs (and even buildings, for that matter) are much too wobbly for reference-precision GPS
    signal calibration. Stations like this are directly anchored to bedrock, preferably with minimal
    seismic activity (that includes even not-so-nearby roads) and with a full-sky view.

    I doubt that any of the official russian presences satisfies those constraints.

    Note that I'm not saying clandestine (or rather "undeclared" - I don't see how anyone would need
    permission to run a non-broadcasting monitoring station on private ground) are impossible or don't
    exist, just that urban locations and building roofs wont work.

  20. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

    Hah, that graphics and typography reminded me of my favourite Linux game. ;-)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  21. Re:I don't understand why they need permission by the_other_chewey · · Score: 2

    Or just found and fund a corporation and do it in the open.

    It could even be a for-profit company run by American staff, charging the Russian
    government for the data. Broadcasting needs a license, but I don't see how a
    reception-only monitoring of signals on private ground run by a private company
    would need any kind of official permission.

    Receiving signals within some US government-run frequency bands might be
    illegal (I didn't find any examples with a quick search though), but GLONASS
    signals don't really fall in that category...

  22. Re:... w ... t ... f ... by foobar+bazbot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Besides, what does GPS need ground stations for?

    You need ground stations for SBAS (WAAS is the GPS SBAS, not sure whether GLONASS currently has an equivalent and if so what it's called); there main function is to measure ionospheric delay characteristics, process the results, and upload it to the satellites so GPS/GLONASS devices with SBAS capability can receive it and use it to refine their position estimates.

  23. Don't assume there is any trust here. by doubledown00 · · Score: 2

    Help the Russians set up a program that allows them to create a GPS system that will compete with the U.S.

    or

    Help the Russians set up a program that allows them to create a GPS system that will compete with the U.S........and which could be actively shut down / hacked/ sabatoged within U.S. borders if an "incident" ever arose. And which Russian "allies" are likely to sign on to use this alternative? Why China, North Korea, Iran, and Syria of course.

    If all the revelations about the NSA show anything, it's that everyone is busy spying on everyone. Therefore the U.S. should presume that these stations will be used, at least tangentially, for that purpose. Note that that is not necessarily a reason to decline the request. If properly managed, it could be used by the U.S. security apparatus to better monitor and determine Russia's own capabilities. It could also be a useful way to "leak" sensitive sounding FUD back to the motherland.