Slashdot Mirror


Many UAVs Vulnerable To Directed-Energy Weapons

mask.of.sanity writes "A New Zealand researcher has detailed ways that UAVs can be crashed using cheap tools like Herf guns and GPS jammers, and could even be downed by flying drones with more powerful radio. The attacks (podcast) interfere with the navigation systems used by flying drones and are possible because security was not designed into the architecture of some machines."

8 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. anti-drone warfare by AndroSyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was only a matter of time before anti-drone warfare came about. This happens with every new piece of weaponry, the quest for the anti-weapon. They don't call it an arms race for no reason.

  2. Re:Directed energy weapons by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Informative

    The catch here is that these "directed energy weapons" were cheap trivialities bought off eBay and not military EW apparatus or gigantic celestial furnaces.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  3. Re:UAV's vulnerable to directed-energy weapons? by slim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Beautifully put, and correct.

    However:

    New Zealand security researcher Stuart MacIntosh told delegates at the Kiwicon 7 conference in Wellington that some vulnerable drone technology designed in the hobby space had trickled down into use by police and commercial operators.

    Which makes it notable. Before you use a consumer-oriented item for more serious use, you need to evaluate its fitness for purpose.

    Of course, you might go ahead and use it anyway - that's what risk assessment is all about.

  4. Also vunerable to bullets by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    You could probably take a low-flying one down with a trebuchet.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Also vunerable to bullets by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Soviet attempt to train anti-tank dogs was...less than successful. The Russians trained their dogs with their own diesel-fueled tanks, which smelled different from German gasoline-fueled tanks. In the field, they discovered that this meant they had trained the dogs to blow up Soviet tanks but not German ones.

  5. Re:Illegal by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nope. That an UAV is vulnerable to extreme high power microwaves just doesn't surprise me.
    There is a lot that would be destroyed with a blast from such a HERF gun. Wifi interfaces and bluetooth devices especially like it. That is why it is usually illegal (and stupid) to use a microwave oven with a damaged containment.

    --
    Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  6. Re:Illegal by gtall · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know about all UAVs but the U.S. military ones are programmed to fly home if they get confused. Dunno how they find home if they lose GPS but at least they thought about the issue.

  7. Re:UAV's vulnerable to directed-energy weapons? by bobbied · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, if you can get a drone within 50 yards of me, I could possibly hit it with the shotgun. Outside of that range, things get a whole lot more difficult and it's going to be impossible outside of about 100 yards. Trying to hit a drone using a rifle is about the best you can hope for beyond 100 yards, and those shots would be one in a million.

    So, if the drone is flying higher than about 150 feet it is unlikely to be in danger from any kinetic weapon carried by the perp.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101