Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Certifications For High School Credits In Australia

kanad writes "High school students in Queensland, Australia would be able to do Microsoft certifications online and get credits. The exam fees will be free for students and courses include Microsoft's products like Sharepoint and SQL Server. Ostensibly this is for making kids ready for the workforce. but Australian IT entrepreneur Matt Barrie CEO of freelancer.com has criticised it for vendor lock-in and Microsoft's influence in the educational system."

37 of 126 comments (clear)

  1. Sharepoint and SQL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been hearing that high school curriculums have been increasingly dummied down, but I had no idea it was this bad.

    1. Re:Sharepoint and SQL? by mjwx · · Score: 2

      Devil's Advocate: At least a Mac gives the kid access to a proper UNIX shell ("Terminal") and a free dev kit

      Which you can guarantee almost no Mac users will use.

      You've got a better chance of a Windows user installing Cygwin or dual booting (as most sysadmins will do) than you do of a Mac user actually knowing what the terminal is.

      But if you're being hired for a job that requires Unix command line experience, you should have experience with proper Unix systems such as AIX, not OSX. I'm talking about average users who are expected to know how to operate corporate desktop, not a server. The situation has gotten so bad that in Australia they now (not so) innocently ask if you use Mac or Windows at home during an interview. They do this because too many Mac users have been hired that lacked basic computing skills.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. Not good by bravecanadian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Certifications are no substitute for fundamentals.

    The problem with certifications is that they date so quickly as versions and products come and go.

    Understanding fundamentals helps you pick up anything new.

    1. Re:Not good by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with certifications is that they date so quickly as versions and products come and go.

      Of course. A high-schooler getting a MS certification now will be ready to spend a hefty chunk of student-loan cash to get the up-to-date version as soon as their next graduation rolls around, just to avoid looking like they've been ignoring the real world while in that ivory tower.

      Microsoft comes away profiting and looking like a hero.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Not good by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't about the certs as much as it is getting kids programmed to use Microsoft products.

      Like drug dealers, they need to capture the next generation. The first is always free.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Not good by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Certifications are no substitute for fundamentals. The problem with certifications is that they date so quickly as versions and products come and go. Understanding fundamentals helps you pick up anything new.

      Which is why you will be employable in ten years and they won't. So hush, don't tell them! ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Not good by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any company that requires current "certifications" for people who have been working years in the field deserves exactly what they get. I haven't been certified since my Novel days, and haven't even been interested since. IF people doubt my qualifications based on what I have been doing for the past 20 years, fine by me, I don't want to work for them.

      The exception is people who are outside hires for tech support, who want to toss out "We only employ certified people". Okay, that's great, but again, you get exactly what you should expect, marginal competency and "by the book" work. Do not expect creative solutions to impossible problems.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    5. Re:Not good by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The core concepts in Word and Excel apply to other free and commercial word processors and spreadsheet software. Yes, the certifications benefit Microsoft more than other vendors, but the important question is whether the MS-based certifications are a net benefit to society as a whole.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    6. Re:Not good by hamster_nz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like churchs, they need to capture the next generation. The first hit of relegious salvation is always free.

      FTFY.

    7. Re:Not good by ausekilis · · Score: 2

      There's a good argument for getting a certification, but only certain ones. For example, most major contractors as well as the DoD look to Security+ or the CISSP. It provides a common ground for all IT focused personnel and ensures they have a strong knowledge base. Is it closed minded? Definitely. A Masters in CS, CE or even an MBA (with IT focus) will be completely ignored, even if the individual proves to someone with a CISSP that they know their stuff. However, the CS program is different than CE is different than MBA, and certainly differs from school to school.

      IT has certifications. Medicine has certifications. Education has certifications. Child care has certifications. Some of those are used in conjunction with degrees and further pad the salary, others are used to ensure that the person has had training commensurate with the duties they are/will be performing. In others, failure to have a certification or ability to acquire it is grounds for legal action or termination.

      If not for a certification, how would you propose that I, as an employer for a large corporation, filter through the 1000s of resumes coming across my desk without having to interview every single person?

    8. Re:Not good by femtobyte · · Score: 2

      To further the comparison, at least in the US, the numbers I found indicate $97B annual donations to religious organizations, which also includes a substantial amount of aid organizations who provide charity services besides "spreadin' the faith."

      Microsoft's annual revenue in 2013 was $78B, for pure selfish capitalism. So, Microsoft rakes in a comparable amount of money to all religious-affiliated donations (including legit aid/charity work) combined in the "highly religious" US.

      Generally, I'd rate Microsoft's accumulation of wealth and power (to spread their own "religion" of lockin to Microsoft products) as a greater threat to global wellbeing than all religious institutions combined (who at least do a reasonable mix of altruistic good alongside self-serving power grabs, which is 100% the goal of a for-profit corporation).

    9. Re:Not good by exomondo · · Score: 2

      This isn't about the certs as much as it is getting kids programmed to use Microsoft products.

      Granted they will learn on Microsoft products but many of the skills and concepts will be easily translatable to other products, the real question is why hasn't the Linux foundation (or any of the other free software foundations) gotten in on funding and providing courseware for high schoolers?

    10. Re:Not good by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      And the important answer is "no".

    11. Re:Not good by mjwx · · Score: 2

      The problem with certifications is that they date so quickly as versions and products come and go.

      Of course. A high-schooler getting a MS certification now will be ready to spend a hefty chunk of student-loan cash to get the up-to-date version as soon as their next graduation rolls around, just to avoid looking like they've been ignoring the real world while in that ivory tower.

      Erm, three things wrong with this.

      1. Australia does not support the idea of predatory student loans.
      2. We're talking about high school, which means the student is too young to apply for any kind of loan (including HECS).
      3. Given the number of "exam prep" programs out there that allow you to rote memorise the questions and pass the test without actually studying any of the course material for free, this isn't really an effective revenue stream (doubly so considering the exam fees are waived for high school students).

      Now the real problems are:
      1. Vendor lock in. Microsoft is trying to get kids locked in at a young age, so is Apple. Both are just as bad for students, Apple's slightly worse as Mac skills are useless in the job market. I've done some hiring in the Aussie IT market recently, we've learned one of the key questions is "do you use Windows or Mac at home" and if it's Mac, they go to the bottom of the pile. We've hired to many people without basic computing skills not to do this.
      2. Students aren't actually learning the fundamentals, yep they might be able to point and click their way through a sharepoint install but they dont understand what its doing.
      3. As I said above, the students can simply download the exams off the internets and memorise them. Easy course credit without any real work (or real learning).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  3. Why the negative? by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    How is getting an MCSE any more or less useful than taking any other elective in Shop or Band or Home Ec'?

    They still have to take the three R's to graduate. You don't get to skip your civics class to take one of these...

    1. Re:Why the negative? by king+neckbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Generally speaking, a shop class will teach you skills that are useful for tools not made by Dewalt, band will be useful for playing instruments not made by Yamaha, and Home Ec will provide skills that are useful outside of Rubbermaid products.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    2. Re:Why the negative? by EMG+at+MU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is getting an MCSE any more or less useful than taking any other elective in Shop or Band or Home Ec'?

      They still have to take the three R's to graduate. You don't get to skip your civics class to take one of these...

      It's less useful because you didn't take Shop where you only learned how to use Milwaukee brand tools. You didn't take Cooking and only learn to use KitchenAid products.

    3. Re:Why the negative? by Sarten-X · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Shop, band, and home ec' classes are all general-knowledge classes, whose principles apply to many aspects of life later on, regardless of what career path you choose.

      An MCSE certification is only useful in one particular field, under very particular circumstances. It looks good to parents, because every individual parent is going to be happy that their kid has a promising future in computers, but the reality is that most of those high-schoolers won't actually take a computer career, and most of those that eventually do will have another several years of college to learn other general skills before they'll (maybe) use that certified knowledge.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:Why the negative? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't just about Free Software.

      There are other brands of commercial software too. Microsoft isn't the only commercial software vendor in existence. Even their own payware applications suffer from severe UI churn.

      Even if you have Microsoft blinders on and love them, fixating on a single release of a single brand of product is problematic.

      The "hate anything Microsoft" approach does not require Free Software.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:Why the negative? by mythosaz · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...and learning how to use SMS or SCCM or App-V gives you skills that translate to HP or BMC. Learning Hyper-V gives you skills that translate to Citrix and VMWare.

      You can't be a certified Ford mechanic without picking up some of the skills to be ACE certified...

    6. Re:Why the negative? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      ...but the reality is that most of those high-schoolers won't actually take a computer career, and most of those that eventually do will have another several years of college to learn other general skills before they'll (maybe) use that certified knowledge.

      Good. Them most of them won't choose those electives over Jazz Band.

    7. Re:Why the negative? by mythosaz · · Score: 2

      *rabble* *rabble* Because it's not open-source... hate anything Microsoft... *rabble* *rabble*

      I didn't get a HARUMPH! outta that guy...

      www.youtube.com/watch?v=JN99jshaQbY

    8. Re:Why the negative? by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If it was Apple or Linux, it would be the greatest idea since sliced bread.

      Ya think? :)

      If the title were Linux Certifications For High School Credits In Australia people would be shitting themselves in glee. [More so than usual...]

    9. Re:Why the negative? by cbhacking · · Score: 2

      Because you can navigate the command prompt and write batch scripts, are familiar with driver configuration concepts (still relevant today if you're developing them, admittedly pretty useless just as a user of PnP hardware), know what Windows binaries look like inside (assuming you used the debug program available at the time), understand hierarchical file systems and the Windows registry, are familiar with Windows shortcuts files, are familiar with Windows' built-in programs (really, many of them haven't changed that much since 98), probably have pretty good keyboarding skills (that was one of the main things I learned in elementary school computer classes, and I'm probably within five years of your age), and plenty of other things, both vendor-specific and not? Computer skills don't just evaporate with each new OS release, or even switching between completely different systems (although it sometimes feels that way when I use a Mac, and yes, I use both Linux and FreeBSD...)

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    10. Re:Why the negative? by Smauler · · Score: 2

      As soon as I read the summary I thought - of course it was criticized, it's Microsoft!

      Oh, FFS. You are blind if you think the reason Microsoft have been criticised and are still criticised is because it's a knee-jerk reaction. Look at their track record.

      I say this as a Vista user, and I quite like Vista. No, honestly, there is at least one. I admit I used Windows 8 for the first time today, and have since changed my opinion. Now I believe every operating system is the equivalent of beatifically joyful tears of unicorns, except for Windows 8.

  4. MCSE? by drainbramage · · Score: 3, Informative

    MCSE: Minesweeper Consultant and Solitaire Expert
    ---
    They get school credit for that now?

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  5. Educational insitutions and vendors by wumbler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Several years back, I gave a few guest lectures at some local univesities about network security. Intrusion detection was an important topic. There are some very nice open source IDS out there, Snort obviously being the most well known one. So, what does the university do? Instead of using Snort as a basic teaching tool, they instead went for a proprietary solution of some mid-teer vendor. As a result, they passed on a perfectly good opportunity to let students take a look 'under the hood' and see how the inside of such a system works by examining the source code, limiting them to just fiddling with the UI of the proprietary vendor. Shameful!

    In the local press we can always read wonderful accounts how Microsoft "donated" millions of dollars worth of software to local schools. Of course, it's never reported that there is hardly any cost to Microsoft in doing so, definitely not millions, and that in return they get well-trained Microsof-monkeys entering the work force, knowing and demanding to only work with Mircosoft tools. Shameful!

    It began a long time ago when Apple started to be "generous" with discounts and donations to schools. Microsoft and other vendors are following this "proud" tradition: Schools miss the chance to teach actual understanding of fundamental principles and instead degenerate their courses into nothing more than vendor training. There is too much lobbying, wining and dining and backroom dealing going on here. Where open source should make huge inroads, instead the vendors are doing their best to lock in entire future generations.

  6. What's more dangerous than corp. vendor lock-in? by intermodal · · Score: 2

    Career vendor lock-in. Microsoft wants to get 'em young and turn them into advocates in the name of self-interest, who will keep renewing their certifications and shelling out money to do it, and who will continually keep corporations from switching because it's what they know.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  7. Cisco does it to. by mcbridematt · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was able to do the CCNA program as a unit for my high school certificate (VCE) here in Victoria, Australia. It was delivered through Cisco's Network Academy - to get the credit you had to pass the tests on netacad, but you still needed to sit the formal certification exams afterwards if you wanted the actual CCNA certification.

  8. Courses Include by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think some slashdotters might need some fundamental reading education.

    The summary says "Courses Include". It isn't just Microsoft.
    Article actually says "including SAP, Microsoft and Cisco".

    So long as there isn't exclusivity, the fact these are being offered free to students is a good thing. Yes there is a bit of lock in on the corporate side, that is why they do it for free. Why do you think there are "educational" copies of software for just about everything? Out of the goodness of their bleeding hearts? Heck I know we used Sun systems because they donated the lab to our University (not that I ever did again).

    High School gives you the basics, University gives you fundamentals. College/Technical school gives you certifications. To get a job, many go get certifications post university, I did. I am looking at getting another (Oracle, ya ya I know). However the fact that you can do it in high school, it counts as a credit, AND it is free? That has got to be a good thing. So long as it is not exclusionary (though I would imagine to get credit you would have to be a little discerning). Yes you have to keep up on certifications, or work in the field, but they are probably more or as useful as some of the non-core garbage offered in school these days.

    1. Re:Courses Include by excelsior_gr · · Score: 2

      SAP?!

      Won't anyone think of the children?! This has to stop!

  9. Don't like Microsoft?Come up with something better by dave562 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course the predictable chorus of anti-Microsoft content has popped up.

    My suggestion to you folks is that if you have such issues with Microsoft offering course content to schools, go ahead and come up with an alternative and make it happen. It should be easy to come up with a course, develop all of the materials, train the instructors and keep it up to date.

    Until then, deal with the reality that the large majority of the world runs Microsoft software. There is a Windows application to support practically every business process in existence. It might not be the best solution every time, but it is a solution.

    When I was school, Novell was the dominant vendor. I got my CNA through an ROP program. That class exposed me to a lot of relevant information. Everything from the OSI model, to file system permissions, to client / server architectures, etc. I never thought, "Oh my God. I am being impoverished by learning about technology that companies are using in the real world!" At 16 years old I was excited to be working with servers and clients and learning more about computers than I was able to learn at home. My Novell specific knowledge is worthless now, but the fundamental information that I got from the class, and the real world experience that I got is something that I use daily.

    Who cares if Microsoft is providing the curriculum? Kids are being given the opportunity to expand their knowledge of computers and networks. Kids are naturally curious. If the Microsoft way of doing things sucks, they will come up with other ways to do things.

  10. Simpsons already did that by Master+Moose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This reminds me of the future school in the Simpsons that was sponsored by Pepsi. I believe credit could be gained by answering any question with Pepsi.

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
  11. Beats taking "Seminary" by mythosaz · · Score: 2

    Could be worse. Could be like every school in suburban Arizona or Utah which has a Mormon/LDS temple built adjacent to it, offering Seminary as an elective.

    You need something in the neighborhood of 20-24 "credits" to graduate high school these days -- that's 6 half credit classes per semester for 8 semesters/4 years. Of those 24, 16 or so might be actual book learnin'. The rest are PE and electives. Some of those electives are forced: 1-2 half credits of a foreign language, 1-2 half credits from (pick 1: shop, cooking, sewing), 1-2 half credits from music/art. And the remaining 4 are generally pretty open.

    I'd rather them earn a Microsoft cert in even the dumbest of Microsoft technologies (Sharepoint?) than go next door for further indoctrination by the Mormons.

    ...or maybe not. Mormon make great neighbors.

    [Aside: "Two" is the answer to "How many Mormons do you take fishing with you." If you take one, he'll drink all your beer.]

  12. Re:What's more dangerous than corp. vendor lock-in by intermodal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure McDonald's should take that insult from you.

    One thing about McDonalds is that they continually bring in new products AND kill old ones that people aren't buying much anymore. They also change things up to fit demand, they compete on price, they are willing to vastly change their menu to suit locales (India is a great example), avoiding the ignorant push for a one-size-fits-all solution for everyone.

    I really wish Mcrosoft were mroe like McDonald's.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  13. Re:Don't like Microsoft?Come up with something bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    O'Reilly's "Practical Programming" + a Python interpreter, even if it ran on MS Windows, wouldn't be the ecosystem lock-in that a Microsoft cert is.

  14. Re:Don't like Microsoft?Come up with something bet by SteveC5 · · Score: 2

    The industry will value an MCSE over a Austrialian educational "certificate of completion" any day.... Is MSFT also investing in trying to get people to keep using their products? Sure.... The whole industry does and has been doing this.... Cisco is doing it. I remember back in the 80's Apple had a program where you gave your school your grocery receipts and they would "donate" equipment based on how much in receipts were collected. I believe IBM did this as well... Students will either stick with MSFT or their IT passion will take them to other ventures regardless...