Slashdot Mirror


FCC To Consider Cellphone Use On Planes

aitikin writes "The Federal Communications Commission is expected to propose allowing passengers to use their cellphones on airplanes. While phone use would still be restricted during takeoff and landing, the proposal would lift an FCC ban on airborne calls and cellular data use by passengers once a flight reaches 10,000 feet. From the article: 'The move would lift a regulatory hurdle, but any use of cellphones on planes would still have to be approved by the airlines, which have said they would approach the issue cautiously due to strong objections from their customers. Airlines would have to install equipment in their planes that would communicate with cellphone towers on the ground.'"

32 of 183 comments (clear)

  1. please don't by TheMeuge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this would lead to in-flight homicide.

    1. Re: please don't by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this would lead to in-flight homicide.

      I can imagine a situation where someone who can't exert any impulse control gets on a mobile phone while the rest of the cabin is trying to sleep, a very real risk of on-board assaults from tired and frustrated travelers.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re: please don't by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 4, Funny

      The real risk is that the plane is full of polite British travellers who are too reserved to punch the caller and instead just tut noisily for 12 hours.

      The safety demonstration needs to include a demonstration of how to safely and effectively disable the goatfucker who takes out his 'phone. Perhaps it could include step-by-step advice on how to break the equipment without causing a fire hazard by piercing the li-ion battery.

    3. Re: please don't by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think this would lead to in-flight homicide.

      I can imagine a situation where someone who can't exert any impulse control gets on a mobile phone while the rest of the cabin is trying to sleep, a very real risk of on-board assaults from tired and frustrated travelers.

      If I were on the jury I'd refuse to convict those guilty of assault, provided they used no (improvised) weapons and stopped once their point had been made.

      It's a shitty sign of the times that, so often, you can no longer politely ask someone to stop being annoying. They'll get "offended" and belligerent instead of being enough of a person to recognize that you had cause. Accepting a legitimate and polite correction is now viewed as a sign of weakness or submission. That's the cause of a great deal of violence, in fact nearly all violence that is not state-sponsored.

      The social fabric is currently as unsustainable as the financial edifice of society. It makes me wonder if it will change course. What you said about impulse control has everything to do with having a little discipline and personal responsibility (it wouldn't take much). These things aren't "fun" or "entertaining" to acquire so more and more people can't be bothered. Am I alone in witnessing how tragic this is? Assholes with phones here, idiots gathering to chat and blocking doorways there, someone running off the road (or over the median) because their call or burger or makeup is more important to them elsewhere -- these little things are merely symptoms.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:please don't by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And you'd be wrong. Seriously America is behind the times on the issue. I've taken several international flights where cellphone use was permitted and a) it didn't lead to endless chatting due to obscene international roaming calls, and b) if someone was on the phone more than 2-3 seats away you couldn't hear them anyway over the noise of the engines.

    5. Re: please don't by noh8rz10 · · Score: 3, Funny

      you could dump your drink on him or her. that would do the trick for the phone without actual violence. Also, it is within the capability of most hominids.

    6. Re: please don't by Cyberax · · Score: 2

      A lot of people ALWAYS scream into mobile phones. I _know_ that I can whisper into the microphone and it will be picked up just fine, but lots of people seem to think that you have to speak LOUDLY.

    7. Re: please don't by icebike · · Score: 2

      Its because you are having trouble hearing.
      I once had an employee who talked at the top of his lungs on the phone, land line.
      I ordered him an amplify phone receiver, and the difference was like night an day. He was slowly going deaf, and didn't realize it.

      If planes required ear buds, there would be a lot more peaceful flights. But you know that won't happen.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re: please don't by Cyberax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesn't matter. There's no sidetalk (i.e. you can't hear yourself) on the mobile phone, so lots of people scream even with earphones.

    9. Re: please don't by bob_super · · Score: 2

      "you see officer, he started fiddling with an electronic device which stores enough power to threaten the aircraft's integrity. We had to stop him"

    10. Re:please don't by dysmal · · Score: 2

      I have full confidence in my fellow Americans to exercise their right to be an asshat at 30,000 feet. If people can't stay off the phone at the movie theater, what makes anyone think they'll be considerate of those that surround them in "cattle class" on planes?

    11. Re: please don't by Hork_Monkey · · Score: 2

      You're not taking into account that many people are unable to speak quietly while on a phone, when they are able to in other situations.

  2. Trigger Happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    *ringtone*
    *pulls out GIANT brick phone*

    What!?!

    No!!!!

    I'm on an airplane!!!!

    I'm on an airplane!!!!

    No!!!

    What?!?!?!?

    I'm on an airplane!!!!

    Yes, an airplane!!!

    No, I can talk!!!!

    What?!?!?!?!

    No, I can talk!!!!

  3. Re:Here comes the flood.... by TheMeuge · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here comes the flood of people complaining about having to listen to other people talking...

    Even though it's really no different to people talking to the person next to them

    Except people tend to talk louder on the phone than in person... and you're trapped next them for the next n hours.

    Put the phone down. It won't hurt. I promise.

  4. HELLO? by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

    HELLO! GLADYS? I'M ON THE PLANE! I CAN SEE CLOUDS! ONE LOOKS LIKE A RUTABAGA! DO YOU THINK THAT MEANS ANYTHING? SO HOW WAS YOUR DAY? WAIT SOMEONE NEXT TO ME IS TRYING TO GET MY ATTENTION. EXCUSE ME CAN'T YOU SEE I'M ON THE PHONE? HOW RUDE!

    great, now I have to bypass the yelling filter... sdlfjals;kdfjakl; sklsfdlkas; lsdksdk lsk dslk sdl ksdlk; dsl;sd ldslklsd klds;l dsl;k ksdkl;sdlkdskl; sd;klsdk l; sdkllks;d skdl; skldkl;ds k;ldskldsklsfjlskdfk sdl lks dklds lks;dlk ds ;klsdlk dsdkls slkldkslk;d;klsdkl dsl;skd l;kds ksdl; sdkldslk sldk;l kdsk;lsd lkkl;ds ds ;klsd kl;kdsl; k;ldsksd kl k;sdkl;sl;kd klsd;lkds l;kdslk sd;lkk; lsd;lkds l;ksd;klds ;klsdkldsl;k sd ;lksd ;klsd l;ksdl;k sd lk;dsl ;ksdl ;kds l;kds l;kdskl ;sdklsd k;l;sdkl;klsd;klsd kl;ds k;lds; lksdkl; ds;kl sdkl ;sdl ksd klsd; lkdsk ldsklsd;lkds ;lkds ;lkds ;klds; lksd;kl

  5. Re:Here comes the flood.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Or not

    “It’s very emotional in the United States,” said Benoit Debains, the chief executive of OnAir. He insisted that the anxiety was overblown. For one thing, he and other industry executives said, standard cabin noise covers up much conversational noise, yet people with cellphones pressed to their ears in that environment somehow do not feel the need to speak louder to compensate.

    “I remember on the first flight we did, we asked one guy, ‘What do you think about using the phone for voice in the cabin?’ He said he was against it. But we said, ‘You know, the guy across from you has been using his phone for the last five minutes.’ ”

    Emirates executives have even heard from skeptical pilots and flight attendants who mistakenly believed “the system was on but nobody was using it” on a particular flight, he said. “And I was able to go back to them and say, well 63 people had their phones on, and there were 22 phone calls and 68 messages.”

    He added, “They were thinking it must be broken because they don’t hear anybody using it.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/technology/29phones.html

  6. Verbal diarrhea by Mister+Liberty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cell phones not a problem on busses and trains?
    Have you ever took a train during rush hour?
    Terror right there.

  7. Ban Removed Due to New Revenue From Micro-Cells by ad454 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was never any safety issues with using a cell phone anytime during flight. If there was, don't you think that planes would be dropping like flies from every nutcase and terrorist turing on (or leaving on) their cell phones?

    It was disallowed because it cut into airline revenue from expensive airplane to satellite phones. However now that airlines are deploying micro-cells, with huge roaming fees, guess with, its now magically time to remove cell phone restrictions. But only when the planes are above 10000 feet, in order to allow these micro-cells to override ground based cell towers, and insure roaming revenue.

    Below 10000 feet, the in-flight cell phone ban must remain in place, since it is much easier to bypass the micro-cells in planes and connect directly (and cheaply) to a ground based cell towers.

    1. Re:Ban Removed Due to New Revenue From Micro-Cells by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      10k feet is cruising altitude

      Looks like we're going to need a bigger plane. The only planes that would be cruising at 10k feet would be non-pressurized ones. Even on a short hop, a jet is going to be cruising at least 25,000 feet.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:Ban Removed Due to New Revenue From Micro-Cells by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It was disallowed because it cut into airline revenue from expensive airplane to satellite phones.

      Sorry to spoil your capitalist conspiracy but it was banned due to the technical issues around the air interface. Specifically Cell Reselection became a major headache where the signal would rapidly hop from one tower to the other. Changing cells presents quite a burden on the infrastructure as calls are re-routed and resources are allocated. A plane full of talking phones while flying over a city will very quickly lead to dropped calls as 15 subscribers bounce to a cell at the same time and then move on seconds later.

      Then there's also issues regarding the radio signal itself. There's cells on the market specifically intended to be installed on high-speed rail lines. They throw most other requirements out the window in favour of high gain and directionality (reduce the number of handovers required in a trip), and using fancy patented radio voodoo to get the GSM to work at a speed higher than 250km/h.

      See for a long time you couldn't use your phone on a high-speed rail either. Well it wasn't banned, but it just plain didn't work for more than a few seconds at a time.
      The existence of micro-cells and re-routing calls via satellite overcomes these technical hurdles.

  8. Re:Here comes the flood.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    “I remember on the first flight we did, we asked one guy, ‘What do you think about using the phone for voice in the cabin?’ He said he was against it. But we said, ‘You know, the guy across from you has been using his phone for the last five minutes.’ ”

    Draw your own conclusion as to why he was against it.

  9. Re:Here comes the flood.... by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    standard cabin noise covers up much conversational noise, yet people with cellphones pressed to their ears in that environment somehow do not feel the need to speak louder to compensate.

    And right there you have the crux of the problem. This guy does not understand human nature.
    When people can't hear, they shout.

    Without a headset requirement, there will be shouting.
    And most phone speakers are so weak you have trouble hearing in even a slightly loud environment. People will resort to the speaker phone function and then you get to listen to both sides of every conversation at once.

    The best way to get people to talk softer is to require them to use earbuds or headsets.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  10. Re:Is there wireless signal above 10,000 feet? by billrp · · Score: 2

    If you look at wireless signal strength maps like this http://www.datasync.com/~rsf1/cell-air.htm you will see there are gaps in vertical coverage - where there's no signal. So I don't see how even any special equipment in planes can work with such low signal levels. (The old airfones used a different communication connection)

  11. Re:Bus by profplump · · Score: 2

    That's right. You only have to speak over the sound of the diesel engine, the wind noise, the traffic noise, and the road noise.

    Airplane cabins are probably someplace in the 70-80 dB range, depending on the type of plane and where you are sitting. That's just about what you'd expect from moderate traffic that includes large vehicles or high speeds. I'm sure there are some buses that are quieter than planes, but it doesn't strike me as a major difference.

  12. Re:Bus by profplump · · Score: 2

    In a metro system of even moderate size you can be on the same bus traveling in the same direction for 2+ hours. That's not a long plane ride, but it's not a trivial amount of time either. And inter-city routes can obviously be much longer.

  13. Hearing half a conversation by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even though it's really no different to people talking to the person next to them

    Hearing half a conversation is worse than hearing a whole conversation.

  14. Re:Bus by neonmonk · · Score: 2

    Yes it is.

  15. Re:I see $$$ signs! by petman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The phones on the backs of seats can only be used to make, not receive, calls. OTOH, with cellphones, the airlines can impose a surcharge for both outgoing and incoming calls, much like with carrier roaming. There's also data roaming. So yes, the airlines to stand to make big bucks on this if they play it right.

  16. Apologies to George Carlin... by maiden_taiwan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Them: "Mind if I yak on my cellphone in this enclosed space?"
    You: "Mind if I fart?"

  17. legality doesn't make it reality by gaiageek · · Score: 2

    The FCC making it legal is one thing. Airlines allowing it is another. Given the overwhelmingly negative response I've seen on this so far today, I think it's pretty safe to say that any airline that decided to allow passengers to make calls on their phones would risk losing business -- especially the business of frequent flyers. People who fly a lot tend to be quite familiar with the annoyances of flying, so why would they want to fly an airline that potentially adds another?

    What I haven't seen mentioned is whether you'd have to pay a premium for such calls. Assuming you have to pay cruise ship rates (over $2 a minute), that would definitely discourage people from making long chit-chat phone calls to pass the time of their flight. Likewise, I'm sure a time limit on calls could be easily implemented. With such conditions in place, I'd probably be ok with it, and I'd certainly appreciate it if I was ever in a situation where I really needed to make a phone call en route to my destination.

  18. In-flight WiFi by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    You know, a lot of people in here are complaining about in-flight cell use being annoying. But we have had in-flight wifi for awhile now, and you can use the phone over that service any number of ways. Is that being abused?

    TO me, the solution is simple.. you enable the access, but you disallow people from making or taking voice calls via simple airline policy. Text only. This allows people to use their own text and data plans and keeps the annoyance factor to the same level as wifi.

  19. Re:American Airlines has a policy by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

    And did this plane have phones in the back of the seat in front of you ...

    No, it did not. In fact, I can't remember the last time I saw a 'flight phone' in a seat. I think most airlines have ripped those out in favor of 'entertainment centers'.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.