Slashdot Mirror


Property Managers Use DNA To Sniff Out Dog Poop Offenders

Nerval's Lobster writes "News changes during holidays. It gets thinner and lighter and weirder as the hordes of writers and editors who produce the overwhelming flood of news, updates and infotainments go home to annoy friends and family rather than readers and advertisers. Top points in ridiculousness, however, go to the condo- and apartment-complex managers in Braintree, MA, who were inspired to become amateur zoo-geneticists by resident pet owners who not only refused to clean up after their pets, but challenged the apartment managers to prove it was their pets contributing the increasingly hazardous, unpleasant piles of doggie doo on apartment properties. Rather than put up with a neverending supply of potential EcoBot fuel on marring the landscaping, facilities managers took cheek swabs of all the dogs on the property and sent them to A Knoxville, Tenn. that provided DNA profiles under a program with the dignified name 'PooPrints.' Now, for a fee of only $60 per pooch, residential managers can confirm the provider of a pile of PooPrintable material by comparing the DNA in the dog with the DNA in the pile. 'Now you don't really have to worry about dog poop,' said one fan of the practical application of zoological genetic analysis. 'The grass is now ours again, we don't have to worry about it [poop], and that's a good thing.' Restraint is just as important as innovation, of course, so the building managers made a point of telling the AP reporter who wrote the story that they wouldn't extend the effort to identifying which pooch peed on which bush and when. 'That's a little more difficult. We are not going to tackle that.' Finally, in this holiday season, something to be thankful for." The city of Petah Tikva, Israel started a similar identification program in 2008.

14 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You should own a fucking cat instead.

    1. Re:This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The last time a society went nuts and removed many of the cats they had. Because they were 'evil'. We got the black plague exploding. Had they not done that. It's pretty likely the black plague never would have gotten as bad as it did.

      Until we actually get a handle on rodent populations. Cats serve an important purpose. Even today in our 'modern' society. They keep rodent populations in check.

    2. Re: This is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why, I'd never bow down to an inferior animal. That's why I'm a cat person --- I can be certain that my groveling serfdom is in service of a superior species (and they know it).

  2. inconsiderate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Inconsiderate is what people are... I know dogs can be picky but come on... You bought the thing. You take care of it. Yet you can not control one bit and walk 3 blocks so your dog can take a crap somewhere?

    Yesterday while raking my yard I saw a couple who *waited* for at least 10 mins for me to go inside. So they could let their dog piss on my yard eventually they gave up. Thankfully all the dogs in the neighborhood have killed 100x3ft of my grass. I have tried planting more hardy type grasses (so I do not have to water as much). But nothing survives but weeds. Never mind the 3 empty fields nearby. Least most of my neighbors pick the crap up which is about all the credit I can give them.

    1. Re:inconsiderate... by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yesterday while raking my yard I saw a couple who *waited* for at least 10 mins for me to go inside. So they could let their dog piss on my yard eventually they gave up.

      These are the kind of people that motion activated sprinklers were invented for.

    2. Re:inconsiderate... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Flies man, flies. And it smells like shit.

      I keep the dogs of my lawn with a few liberally spread mothballs. Works like a charm, and they are dirt cheap.

      And when I feel like being a prick about it, I'll put down chili powder just before dog walking time.

      --
      Huh?
    3. Re:inconsiderate... by chihowa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean, I can understand if it is a yard where kids play football,etc...

      From my experience, that's where people prefer to leave their dog shit because there's nobody there to yell at them.

      There's a school near my house with a big field where the kids play. The dog owners in the neighborhood apparently think it's a dog park. Dogs off leash running up to little kids walking to school, dog shit left everywhere... it's a disgusting display of self-centered behavior.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  3. Re:Nothing else to do but whine? Try planning ahea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not only that but those services are much less expensive than having poop samples sent off to a lab and analyzed.

    I have two mastiffs and a guy does my entire acre for 15/week.

  4. Re:People really need to get a life by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The normal and civil thing is to pick up after your dog, rather than fouling communal space.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  5. Re:Nothing else to do but whine? Try planning ahea by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Besides, why the heck do you allow animals if you aren't willing to put up with the results of your decision? Charge a fee for animals and pay somebody to come around and clean up the poop, there are services that do that very thing.

    Dog poop on the lawn is a result of dogs and not picking up the poop. If the poop is cleaned any less often than continuously; people will step in, fall in, and roll through (with a wheel chair) dog poop. Owners should pick up dog poop from common spaces.

    --
    -Dave
  6. Re:Nothing else to do but whine? Try planning ahea by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Besides, why the heck do you allow animals if you aren't willing to put up with the results of your decision?

    The owners are expected not to allow dog poop to remain where it's dropped. They're the ones failing in their responsbility. Unless the managers are DNA matching dogs to poop for their own amusement (we've all done it), I assume they're doing so in order to take action against the owners and force them to live up to their responsbilities as pet owners. That's hardly "putting up with it."

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  7. hmm by buddyglass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This doesn't strike me as ridiculous at all. It would only be ridiculous if the apartment failed to build the cost of the DNA analysis service into the fines it assigns to offending dog owners.

    I wonder how much it would cost to preemptively create a DNA database of all the dogs so you have a ready-to-go database for matching poop when its found. Then they wouldn't have to rely on humans "reporting" the offenders. Just get the poop, have it analyzed, and fine the owner.

  8. Re:Poop free, at least our sidewalk by Xest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's at the door wouldn't CCTV on the building be far cheaper and easier?

    It'd take what, 5 mins to rewind to the point of spotting it and recognising the resident no?

  9. Re:Treating tenants like criminals by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, what a wonderful way to improve the already adversarial relationship between property managers and tenants who are inconsiderate asshats

    FTFY.
    Really, anyone who can't be bothered to pick up their pets poop from property that isn't theirs is being exactly that.