Slashdot Mirror


Death to the Trapezoid... Next USB Connector Will Be Reversible

TheRealHocusLocus writes "Extreme bandwidth is nice, intelligent power management is cool... but folks should be spilling into the streets in thankful praise that the next generation miniature USB connector will fit either way. All told — just how many intricate miracle devices have been scrapped in their prime — because a tiny USB port was mangled? For millennia untold chimpanzees and people have been poking termite mounds with round sticks. I for one am glad to see round stick technology make its way into consumer electronics. Death to the trapezoid, bring back the rectangle! So... since we're on roll here... how many other tiny annoyances that lead to big fails are out there?" The new connector will be smaller too.

66 of 408 comments (clear)

  1. fit both ways by Chrisq · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's immoral

    1. Re:fit both ways by NoNonAlphaCharsHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ruins the sanctity of cabling.

    2. Re:fit both ways by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's immoral

      Only if you are a religious bigot.

      I actually believe that all sets of cabling should be treated the same. I object to bigots telling me that I shouldn't stick a USB connector into an SAE AS 50151 B 500 amp connector.

    3. Re:fit both ways by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      This Charles guy had a fancy name for the result of such an experiment: Natural Selection.

    4. Re:fit both ways by Urkki · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ruins the sanctity of cabling.

      No, it's all natural when the cabling is born that way. If you want to see ruined sanctity, ram a current USB plug in the wrong way...

      But I say this is only the first step. Next we must eradicate male - female difference, and have just one plug-socket which will fit, work and feel good no matter how you do the coupling.

    5. Re:fit both ways by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There really aren't 'Apple Haters.'

      There are the true-believer-Apple-zealots.

      And there are the rest of us.

      Apple fosters and thrives by selling to a 'persecuted but superior minority' cult-like customer base. They make a product comparable to a Buick in a market where everybody else drives a regular Chevy, but claim their customers drive a BMW. (there- car analogy firmly in place)

  2. Small Connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Big fails? How about small connectors? I greatly prefer regular-sized USB to micro-USB, they sit much better in the slot.

    1. Re:Small Connectors by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      Not when the device you're trying to connect is smaller than said port!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Small Connectors by Megane · · Score: 5, Funny

      I also prefer regular-sized USB because it also fits into an Ethernet jack, so it can take you THREE times to get it right.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Small Connectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I greatly prefer regular-sized USB to micro-USB, they sit much better in the slot.

      oh, c'mon, that is SO what she said!

    4. Re:Small Connectors by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

      Sigh. This happened to me a week ago. Tried to hook up a USB-B connector to the back of a laserprinter blind. It fit in but wouldn't be detected by the host computer at all. The computer was running Linux Mint so I thought it was a compatibility problem (even though I just moved the printer from another computer running the exact same version of Linux Mint).

      After 20 minutes I decided to turn the printer around and noticed (for the first time) that a USB-B connector would quite easily fit snugly into an ethernet port.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    5. Re:Small Connectors by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

      I've never understood this. Same with HDMI/DVI. Why can HD-SDI transmit 2k uncompressed video and 16 channels of audio easily over a 200m reel of coax cable, yet HDMI wont go any further than 10m.

  3. Atari would be proud by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Interesting

    USB, developed from the Atari 800's SIO technology (1978/79!) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_SIO

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Atari would be proud by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because Wikipedia isn't complete/perfect? Feel free to add the appropriate reference to the page.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:Atari would be proud by crow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, Atari had a serial bus that was quite nice in its day. Too bad they didn't promote it as a standard for other computer makers of the day to use. There are some significant parallels to USB, as well as many differences.

      But what really sets it apart from USB is the lack of standardization, not technical differences. USB was part of a vision for all computers. Atari never considered pushing SIO for use with Apple or Commodore.

    3. Re:Atari would be proud by Megane · · Score: 2

      By that logic, RS-485 was the origin of USB. And unlike SIO, RS-485 actually uses a balanced pair for its data lines.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    4. Re:Atari would be proud by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Informative

      SIO could not be hot-plugged, did not auto-load drivers, could not be hubbed, etc.

      No one is saying SIO is USB, just it shared some DNA and a designer. On your feature list, Hot plugging, no. Auto-load drivers, yes it could. Some of the modems used that. Hubbed? Sort of. Atari didn't release anything but third parties did such as the Quintopus that turned one SIO into 5. http://nleaudio.com/css/products.htm

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  4. Barrel connectors on brick power supplies by amalcolm · · Score: 2

    I'd like to see the back of these. They pull out too easily.

    --
    Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    1. Re:Barrel connectors on brick power supplies by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of times, that's by design. If the laptop is jerked, you'd want it to become disconnected rather than stay plugged in and risk mangling the plug (or worse, the receiving port).

    2. Re:Barrel connectors on brick power supplies by amalcolm · · Score: 2

      I agree, but I've seen them applied to things with no internal batteries - in that case it's curtains if they pull out.

      --
      Time for bed, said Zebedee - boing
    3. Re:Barrel connectors on brick power supplies by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      The same answer still applies - pulling out is preferable to damage to the device, cable, wall wart, or prongs.

  5. another design cue from apple? by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of the notebook's keyboard position, then the trackpad, then the clean designs etc etc...

    1. Re:another design cue from apple? by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      The notebook computer's keyboard position... on the inside?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:another design cue from apple? by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Cue the anti-Lightning connector posts.

      The proprietary nature of Lightning and its excessive control by Apple is bad, but as a functional connector it works pretty well. I can plug my phone in without being able to see anything and thusfar it has been plenty durable, too. (My Proclip car charger/holder uses a lightning/30pin cable in the base, so it gets pretty hard use without any issues).

      I think Apple would have been smart to create a cheap licensing program for it to gain wider adoption, especially for devices that aren't phones or tablets, as well as a more open spec that would have allowed for more innovative use with iPhones for third party components. Now that a USB spec is coming that eliminates the mechanical advantage of Lightning as a plug, the proprietary nature of of Lightning will be more glaring.

    3. Re:another design cue from apple? by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_laptops

      The Apple PowerBook series, introduced in October 1991, pioneered changes that are now de facto standards on laptops, such as room for a palm rest, and the inclusion of a pointing device (a trackball).

    4. Re:another design cue from apple? by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2

      Even more: Later PowerBooks featured optional color displays (PowerBook 165c, 1993), and first true touchpad (PowerBook 500 series, 1994), first 16-bit stereo audio, and first built-in Ethernet network adapter (PowerBook 500, 1994).

  6. Even worse... by cpotoso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the fact that the standard USB connection (rectangle) is not really 180 degrees symmetric (despite a shape that indicates it should be), usually takes 3+ attempts to get it in. Damn it, Jim, a spin-1/2 connector!

    1. Re:Even worse... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find if I go to plug in a USB connector, it's best to change your mind at the last minute and turn it over because you're *always* wrong first time.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    2. Re:Even worse... by loganljb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obviously, you've never tried plugging a USB cable into the back of a tower that can't easily be moved (with a lot of connections in the back, it's rather difficult to move unless all of your wires are long). The plugs are sideways. What's up and what's down?

      Equally, for micro/mini USB, have you ever tried plugging in your phone in the dark, when it's yelling at you about needing to be charged? For that matter, those connectors are TINY. Can you read anything written on them?

      Reversible connectors -- or connectors with an actual OBVIOUS direction -- would be very nice.

    3. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You aren't making sense. No fancy hardware is required for a reversible connector. Put a full set of contacts on the top edge of the connector, put a full set of contacts on the bottom edge. Take all the same cables going to the top, split them, and connect them left to right instead of right to left.

      Maybe you are talking about a reversible cable, which is different. Even then we have ethernet cables and whatnot, so it is just handled by having send and receive lines criss cross going to the other connector.

    4. Re:Even worse... by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find if I go to plug in a USB connector, it's best to change your mind at the last minute and turn it over because you're *always* wrong first time.

      Unfortunately, the only times that I would not be wrong the first time are the times I do this. There is no way to win.

    5. Re:Even worse... by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn it, Jim, a spin-1/2 connector!

      USB connections are quantum entangled. At the other side of the wormhole there's a reality where you've spent your entire life getting the usb in in the first try.

      In that reality you're rich and powerful.

    6. Re:Even worse... by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a practical application of the Monty Hall Problem

    7. Re:Even worse... by DaPhil · · Score: 5, Funny

      USB plugs only fit in after they are observed, Before that, they are in superposition. See http://www.funnyjunk.com/funny_pictures/4555650/The+Quantum+state+of+a+USB/ for an explanation.

    8. Re:Even worse... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Equally, for micro/mini USB, have you ever tried plugging in your phone in the dark,

      The process goes something like: gently push. Doesn't work. wiggle a bit. Still doesn't work. Flip over and try again. Neither of those work either. Then repeat a little bit harder until eventually it goes in or breaks.

      Fun fact: apparently on the nexus 5 you can jam in the connector upside down quite easily!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re:Even worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That is what you get for using a Universal Schrodinger Bus connector.

  7. and Just after by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Interesting
  8. Re:Doesn't Apple have a patent on this? by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    Europeans have. Every time they plug something into a power outlet.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Re:Apple All Over Again by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Unlike Lightning, this is just a connector for USB 2/3, not a whole new interface. A dumb, cheap adaptor should suffice. (Unlike Lightning to 30-pin adaptors which are basically tiny protocol droids translating between the two.)

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  10. USB cables are 4 dimensional by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

    Proof that USB cables are 4 dimensional.

    Apologies if this appears twice. It looks like slashdot ate the first attempt.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:USB cables are 4 dimensional by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

      In human society we have this thing called "humour", and one of its functions is to obviate the stress of common irritations by acknowledging them in an ironic or unexpected fashion, such that the next encounter with the irritant brings the joke to mind and is therefore less irksome. If your own society hasn't reached that level of nuance yet I dare say it is you, sir, who is the ape.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  11. Re:Doesn't Apple have a patent on this? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    Not in the UK. Our plugs are very well designed. Even the sockets include covers over the power holes which can only be retracted by inserting the (Slightly longer) earth pin first.

  12. It's about time by chihowa · · Score: 2

    Connectors that are (un)plugged often should either be symmetrical or clearly indexed. The original (big) USB plug was almost right (in the sense that the plug wouldn't go in the wrong way), except that it was difficult to tell which way the index should be facing. Firewire was a decent implementation of an indexed plug.

    The current micro USB plugs are ridiculous, though. It can takes three tries to plug it in and every time you get it wrong you stress the socket a little. The difference in feel between a correct and incorrect fit is very mushy with some plugs/sockets.

    While we're on the subject, a pure rectangle (a la the USB A plug) is even worse. The USB connector design over the years has been so bad that I wouldn't be too hopeful about what they come up with next.

    --
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
  13. Re:Doesn't Apple have a patent on this? by RDW · · Score: 4, Funny

    Very well designed until you step on one in bare feet, anway.

  14. Re:Doesn't Apple have a patent on this? by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2, Funny

    You really think that those are well designed? It looks like russian solution for me. While it's harder to die from an electric shock, one can easily kill somebody else with such plug :-)

  15. Re:Apple All Over Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good thing we can have adapters. In the EU, micro-USB is required on devices so they will have to keep using the old connector until the law catches up with th enew one...

  16. Re:Death to ... by jones_supa · · Score: 2

    This. The crusty AT keyboard needs a redesign. While you are at it, make it so that it will automatically tell the operating system which language's layout it is.

  17. Re:How hard is it? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    headphone jack. hmmm. inherently shorting!

    as you insert or remove, the ground (larger band) shorts to the other contacts and for amps (and worse, psu's!) this is horrible.

    I first learned this when I was building a diy bipolar (plus and minus) psu. I need a 3 conductor connector. hey, 1/4" phones jack has 3! so I used it.

    took the box into work and it was immediately pointed out to me that for power use, it was really bad! yet I can remember audio alchemy (long gone company but they were well known once for audio gear) used 1/8" trs jacks for power! talk about ZAPPP!! when you insert or remove them. I was just a dumb kid at the time and I realized right away it was wrong; but a full company was doing this for years before they stopped.

    for high end audio gear, they often remove protection circuits and if you remove the phones jack while music is playing, you can often blow the final output transistors or chips. this is well known on many diy designs (some people went with locking trs phone jacks to avoid this problem).

    xlr (for audio) does not short as you insert or remove. but the banded trs or trrs does and for that reason, its one of the worst connector designs, ever.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  18. What about HDMI by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The WORST connectors are the trapezoidal HDMI connectors. Not only are they orientation specific, but they are often used on heavy cables that pull on the connector causing it to lose contact, and even bend the pins in the socket.

    Add in the fact that the data rate is like a zillion bytes per second and there is an encryption handshake that must go just right at the start and you have a clusterfuck.

    HDMI connectors seriously need an upgrade.

  19. Re:Safely remove device by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Informative

    (Protip: write caching is off by default in modern Windows, so you can actually just yank the USB stick when it finishes what it's doing without ill effect.)

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  20. What's wrong with good old TRS plugs? by ehud42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tip-{ring,ring,...}-Sleeve. Easily handles the 3 or 4 connectors needs for just about any modern digital serial connector. Need power? why not modulate the signal on top of the power carrier? Easy to connect, proven reliable (can't count how many times I've broken a mini/micro USB or worse those umpteen pin pico/nano pin connectors that are only used for power or maybe a simple serial connection)

    --
    I'm in my right mind and I have the answer to everything!
  21. Re:Apple All Over Again by nitehawk214 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unlike Lightning, this is just a connector for USB 2/3, not a whole new interface. A dumb, cheap adaptor should suffice. (Unlike Lightning to 30-pin adaptors which are basically tiny protocol droids translating between the two.)

    The image I get in my head is a miniature C-3P0 inside the connector talking very quickly.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  22. Re:Doesn't Apple have a patent on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, they are well designed. Compare to them to the standard EU and US designs which are flimsy, often left to be self-supporting (which they fail at), and have a tendency to just fall out of the sockets in my experience. A UK plug is solid when plugged in, makes an earth connection before a live/neutral connection as it is plugged in, disconnects the live/neutral before the earth is disconnected, and as the poster stated has a shuttered outlet so that the socket is only opened *after* an earth connection has been made. If you think that is a "russian solution" then maybe you think good engineering is communist, and flimsy make do is the american way.

  23. Re:Circle. by darkjedi521 · · Score: 2

    8 pole concentric circle connectors exist - do a search for Speakon NL-8 connectors.

  24. Re:Apple All Over Again by phobos512 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've no use for a protocol droid. What I do need is someone who can understand the binary language of moisture vaporators.

  25. Re:Apple All Over Again by Phreakiture · · Score: 2

    Maybe not as bad as that, but a new USB connector does mean yet another USB cable to carry in your go-bag. I already carry four different kinds.

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
  26. Re:Doesn't Apple have a patent on this? by Megane · · Score: 2

    That's certainly one way to keep the janitor from plugging his floor buffer into the UPS outlet at night!

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  27. Re:Apple All Over Again by makomk · · Score: 2

    There is no silicon between the two devices if you're using USB over the Lightning connector, that's the point - early on in its life, someone tore the cables apart and the data lines are wired straight through, the authentication chip can only communicate with the iPhone and then only at speeds slower than USB 1.1 Low Speed.

  28. Re:Wow, what a great idea! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh right, from Apple.

    You mean the Apple who helped pioneer the first USB connector which everyone hates so much. Seriously people have been whining about the USB connector from about day 1 and reversible/rotationally symmetric connectors have existed for even longer.

    To claim Apple "invented" the idea of a reversible USB connector is utterly just plain silly. Even if you claim it is invention to do something blindingly obvious, you'll be disappointed to hear that Nokia's DKU2 cable was (a) reversible (b) carried USB and (c) existed on the 2002 eara Nokia 6100, a full 5 years before even the first generation iPhone and a year before the iPod's reversible connector supported USB.

    So no, it's not an invention and even if it was Nokia had it before Apple.

    Seriously what is it with Apple Fanbois assuming they invented everything? You know it's possible to enjoy their products *without* having to make up random shit about how they did everything first.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  29. Re:Apple All Over Again by nabsltd · · Score: 2

    The image I get in my head is a miniature C-3P0 inside the connector talking very quickly.

    Don't you mean "C-3P0 talking slightly slower than he normally does"?

    After all, even USB 3.1 is only 10Gbps.

  30. The ancient future awaits! by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the fact that the standard USB connection (rectangle) is not really 180 degrees symmetric (despite a shape that indicates it should be), usually takes 3+ attempts to get it in. Damn it, Jim, a spin-1/2 connector!

    Protip: The USB emblem goes "up". The logo is trademarked, and without it the cables are too frustrating to use. An interesting feat of human engineering indeed.

    Now, let us travel through time far enough into the future that we come to appreciate the greatest connector design possible:

    First, consider the connector with zero lines of symmetry, such as USB, or a polarized pronged plug. There is a 2D plane that the connector travels orthogonal to and which it must breech in order to complete a connection docking sequence. Consider this plane slicing through your connector and receptacle's contacts. Note that there is one receptacle surface for one connector pin passing through the docking plane.

    To the Future! Copy and rotate your receptor 180 degrees in place along the docking plane. Eliminate any conflicting isolation surfaces, and move the pins such that they do not interact with each the other's connection surfaces. Now you have a reversible connector with one line of symmetry in the receptacle. The connector pins can occupy both sets of receptacle contact surfaces, but need only occupy one position to complete the electrical circuits.

    Advance! Now we will perform the same step again, but with a 90 degree increment. Behold! A square connector!

    60 degrees? Hexagonal connectors! Note that just imagining it we can nearly taste the hex filled future!

    Onward, to 45 degrees, and to victory! Octagonal connections even mirror our futurist desire to slice the corners from our square UI windows, and tabs.

    Oh integration, you foul beast. Clearly to see furthest into the future we must have infinite lines of symmetry in our docking plane -- BUT HOW?! With all pins occupying all positions across the USB connector, the left side interacts with the right side. Since connector pins need only exist in one position we need only make the connector pins have zero lines of symmetry -- move all the connector pins to one side. Simultaneously we have a perfectly round receptacle -- Ah, but all intersecting isolation surfaces are removed, this leaves us with only a flat ring of contacts and several pins.

    So, now we will enter a new Dimension! We can stretch the docking plane in the 3rd dimension along the orthogonal connection axis! BEHOLD! We have discovered the most futuristic connector of all time! The Head Phone Jack!

    Now, what's old can finally be new again. Story time is over, now get off my lawn.

  31. Simple solution by PPH · · Score: 2

    Let the British design the next standard. I have yet to see anyone pick up a BS 1363 and not figure out which way to insert it.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  32. Re:Apple All Over Again by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, chargers and cables should be separate. You can take an Apple cable (Lightning on one end, USB 2 on the other hand) and plug it into an iPhone and a Samsung or Nokia USB charger and it works.

    And yet, during the hysteria few months ago about the iPhone charger that electrocuted a customer in China, Apple kept insisting people needed, oh they badly needed, to buy only Apple's branded cable. The shock risk was entirely in what the cable was plugged into, but they insisted otherwise, and it's doubtless that thousands of compliant Apple customers threw out their third-party charging systems (the evil ones that didn't have the Apple branding information on the packaging) and dashed to the Apple Store waving plastic.

  33. Re:Apple All Over Again by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    I tell you, Apple marketeers are absolute genius. That first they can say "branded cable" with a straight face, and that consumers actually buy into it... it's an amazing thing.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  34. Re:Sounds like the apple lightning connector by drakaan · · Score: 2

    ...And before you say "OMG Apple sues over every silly patent!" remember that Samsung sued Apple for the bounce-back effect when you scroll a list and reach the end (no I'm not joking they really did).

    Aside from the fact that you have that precisely backwards, that's correct.

    From the column you linked to written by Florian Mueller (not exactly an Open-Source evangelist):

    ...For example, Apple is suing Samsung over a feature called "rubber-banding." It's the iconic bounce-back effect when you scroll a list (such as your phone's address book) and reach the end. I like it, but if you have rubber-banding and I don't, we can still keep in touch. No nuclear threat there...

    --
    "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
  35. Things you do in the dark by Guppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    The process goes something like: gently push. Doesn't work. wiggle a bit. Still doesn't work. Flip over and try again. Neither of those work either. Then repeat a little bit harder until eventually it goes in or breaks.

    Wait, we're still talking about USB ports here, right?