Slashdot Mirror


Two Million Passwords Compromised By Keylogger Virus

Ocean Consulting writes "CNN is reporting that over two million passwords from web service companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter and Yahoo have been captured via a key logging virus. The story is based on information released by security firm Trustwave. The report critiques how bad people are at making secure passwords, but does mention the use of Pony Botnet Controller."

43 of 174 comments (clear)

  1. I have some bad news and some good news by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Funny

    The bad news is that 2 million passwords have been compromised.

    The good news is that they're all "123456".

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re:I have some bad news and some good news by bob_super · · Score: 2

      The worse news is that the information they protect is all about Tim's lunch and Kristy's horrible new shoes.

    2. Re:I have some bad news and some good news by HairyNevus · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least it wasn't 00000000...

      --
      You were critically hit for no damage. The bruise will look nice, and maybe the scars will make good party talk.
    3. Re:I have some bad news and some good news by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      You like my posts about lunch.... DONT YOU!!!!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re: I have some bad news and some good news by tcdragon94 · · Score: 2

      Crazy! I have the same code on my luggage.

    5. Re:I have some bad news and some good news by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a bit ironic that the summary mentions having strong passwords when it was a keylogger to blame. It wouldn't matter how strong the passwords are in that case.

    6. Re:I have some bad news and some good news by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      Use a password like "pass123word", first type "password", then place the cursor between the fourth and fifth character, then type "123". They'll need something a bit more sophisticated than a simple keylogger to catch those.

      I remember many years ago some old version of Mac OS X refused to let you move the cursor in between already typed password characters, I filed a bug report and got "behaves as intended", but fortunately they came to their senses some time afterwards.

    7. Re:I have some bad news and some good news by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      You say that in jest, but according to Good Morning America the majority of them actually were 123456!

  2. For the record by koan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not bad at making up secure passwords, I'm just bad at remembering them.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  3. Wrong problem? by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The data says that the 10th password in the list was used by 1000 users out of two million. The top ten, combined, accounts for 36,000 (eyeballed) of the two million passwords. That doesn't seem like an epidemic to me. A bit less than 2% - that is actually, IMO, quite good. Two percent of internet users are bad at understanding security? Wow.

    The keylogger is a bigger problem - so long as I type in my passwords, the keylogger can always find out what I am doing! I could have a 20 character really secure password, to no effect. Hell, things in real life are much worse. My pin is 4 digits long, banks identify me by the last four digits of my SSN (which, quite helpfully, they send out in the mail they send me). Maybe it is time to stop bashing people for choosing insecure passwords, and try to fix the systemic problems?

    1. Re:Wrong problem? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Like running insecure Operating systems?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Wrong problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Someone's going to post "use Firefox and noscript, flashblock, ..." but that solution doesn't really work anymore as there are just too many sites and too many scripts to look at before getting any useful work done. I bet many others like me just make a quick judgement on whether the main site is legit, click "allow all this page" and hope to God or whatever that they are careful about where they pull data from. Security is valuable but so is my time and I have no choice if I need to get things quickly done. All the other custom crap like DNS blackholes, firewalling, etc... are even less manageable and more prone to errors. I suppose the best thing would be to browse in a VM and always browse a protected site in a unique session, resetting the VM after each instance but that's a massive headache too for casual browsing even for an experienced IT professional.

  4. Rumors say ... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    ... Chinese and Taiwan Keyboards have a logger build in in hardware, storing all key presses in a kind of flash. And they simply collect old keyboards on the way to the garbage deposits.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  5. Re:12345? by tgetzoya · · Score: 2

    Incredible, that's the combination to my luggage!

  6. This is a key-logger issue by BringsApples · · Score: 3, Informative

    As far as we know, this thing happens all the time, and more than likely, these PCs that are infected, are infected by more than one key-logger. Update your antivirus is a moot point, because unless the 'virus' is known, then the antivirus folks cannot do anything about it anyway. By the time these things are found out, it's far to late anyway. There is no advise that can be given here, except, "Don't get a virus", which is silly to tell someone.

    --
    Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    1. Re:This is a key-logger issue by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Good luck with that plan. I mean sure, if you're RMS and "browse the web" by wgetting the page and emailing to yourself to read in EMACS then sure, you're probably safe from drive-by attacks. But if you need JS enabled to browse then you're vulnerable.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:This is a key-logger issue by Burz · · Score: 2

      Or you can use this ...which I am typing in at this moment.

  7. Tell us more about the virus! by jader3rd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What security hole is the virus making use of? Is there something and end user should look out for? etc, etc?

    1. Re:Tell us more about the virus! by Burz · · Score: 2

      It seems to be Windows, if you follow the links. I think the details are almost unimportant though; Desktops need an integrated hypervisor to be reliably secure. This greatly reduces the attack surface, though none are as good as Qubes OS at this point.

  8. not me by jafac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good thing I almost never key-in my passwords.

    I copy them straight off of strongpasswordgenerator.com, and paste them into my password fields.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:not me by deroby · · Score: 2

      Seems like a fun challenge for any (serious) keylogger author out there. Probably will add a couple of hours of the more fun kind of coding to his 'job'.

      I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but it will only help out against the very basic keyloggers. Then again, it WILL protect against hardware keyloggers that sit between the keyboard and the computer as those have no access to the clipboard. But in that situation simple auto-typing or simple copy-pasting would be sufficient.

      --
      If there is one thing to be learned on slashdot, it has to be sarcasm.
  9. Desktop attack by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Adobe password breach was about 40-100 millon passwords,a lot reused in other services. But the method was different, instead of hacking into a single server with a very bad password policy, this went right to the desktops of people in that botnet. So no matter how safe you were using your password or picking a complex one, if your desktop security is not good enough (and there are a lot of cases of widespread malware avoiding antivirus detection for years) your carefully built password policy could be defeated at the moment of using them.

    About common passwords used, is almost predictable to find them having millons of passwords, but the strenght of the password is not the problem here.

  10. Little hint please? by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm looking for more technical information on this virus. Is there a collection of different key logging software all sending the passwords to the same proxy server? How does someone get infected by this virus? How about the IP addresses of the proxy servers so people can at least look for traffic from their firewalls?

    This article seems kind of useless other than to scare people into purchasing some protection, which conveniently the company writing the article sells!

  11. Re: Secure password vs keylogger. by decsnake · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A "secure" password does nothing to mitigate keyloggers. The only thing that does is two factor.

    I think the comments regarding the password strength were general, and basically the usual Slashdot topic drift.

    IMO it's way past time for two factor everywhere. Federating logins makes that much more feasible.

  12. Hey, if you get a minute. by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since they haven't published the impacted usernames yet, if one of you has access to the database, could you see if my password is in it?

    D0uble!!8R3view

    T.I.A.

    1. Re:Hey, if you get a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since they haven't published the impacted usernames yet, if one of you has access to the database, could you see if my password is in it?

      D0uble!!8R3view

      T.I.A.

      Actually they should publish a list of the hashed passwords. I am eagerly awaiting this to find out if I have been hacked! For example, if they published a list of the passwords hashed with SHA256, then average joe slashdot could do a lookup on the list of 2 million to see if their password was compromised, without having to reveal the actual password in plaintext. I just checked, the SHA256 hash of your password is: "497835d7e73195527ab79857ec051bf2c13ad51c02f48a2af252fa2805a866cb" So in my proposed scheme, you could download software to check SHA256 hash, type in your password, and then paste the resulting hash into a search query on the list of compromised passwords.

    2. Re:Hey, if you get a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think I've got you beat on entropy:

      qbJSK08jPHl3t4u7

      They can't crack 95-bit random passwords yet, so I should be totally safe, right?

      -Posting as AC because I can't login to my /. account right now. I think must be a temporary glitch.

    3. Re:Hey, if you get a minute. by mythosaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll offer that as a web service.

      Just type your most commonly used username/password pairs into my website, and I'll instantly tell you if they're compromised.

  13. Re:OMG Pony BotNet! by aliquis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Got to be a whole freaking lot better than the 8 characters stuff even with various cases, numbers and symbols.

    I love how people with a clue suggest people use different passwords everywhere and then more or less every single page in the universe require you to have a freaking login and often don't use any central stuff for doing so (somewhat better now with facebook and Google then again do I really want to connect my accounts that way?)

    Guess a certificate / private key and password isn't all that much better but it's way more convenient.

  14. Re:Yeah, they all require an email address by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Informative

    With your own domain and software like KeePassX, it's surprisingly easy. You never even have to type passwords or usernames. Once you get it set up it's actually even easier than using the same password everywhere, and vastly more safe.

  15. My Bank Has The Solution: Mother's Maiden Name by rueger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of late my bank has been on a new drive to irritate all customers under the guise of protecting our security. On top the ever so secure four number PIN, and the usual login password, and the three digit CVV number (which I assume anyone stealing credit card info will also collect).

    They now have two very secure additions to their arsenal:

    1) Once you have logged in, and you wish to add another company to the list of those to whom you can send money - bill payments - you must also type in a five digit security code. A code that different from your PIN, or any other log-in.

    Of course because you only use this about once a year you will have forgotten it, so you need to generate new one. While still logged in. With no further authentication.

    Yes, adding a payee to the list requires you to enter a number that you created five seconds previously. Wow. I feel so safe.

    2) Authentication Questions: the ever popular list of ten questions about things that you did thirty-five years ago, or where there could be multiple possible answers. Where did you meet your spouse? (Which one?) What was the name of your childhood pet? (Again, which one?) What was your favourite TV show at age 13? (Damned if I know.) What was the Zip Code of your Grade Three elementary school?

    In other words, my money is secured through the use of a list of questions that any of my Facebook followers could find in about five minutes. Assuming that I ever put anything truthful on Facebook.

    The basic problem is that the whole password concept stopped being an effective protection years ago, and no-one has come up with a really good way to replace it. So instead we get corporations forcing people to jump through meaningless hoops in the hopes that we won't notice.

    Or worse, encouraging us to use one corporation's log-in across multiple platforms - thus ensuring that one security breach will open many doors to your on-line affairs. Seriously, does anyone think that using Facebook to log in elsewhere is a good idea?

    1. Re:My Bank Has The Solution: Mother's Maiden Name by javacowboy · · Score: 2

      What's worse is that the mother's maiden name question doesn't work:

      1) If your mother divorced your father and took her maiden name.
      2) If you're relatively young and your mother lives in Quebec, where women are now required to keep their maiden names.

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
    2. Re:My Bank Has The Solution: Mother's Maiden Name by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of late my bank has been on a new drive to irritate all customers under the guise of protecting our security.

      UK banks have introduced personal card readers. When prompted you insert your card into your own card reader, enter your PIN and then enter a number that the website gives you. You then enter into the web form the resulting number that your card reader provides. In this way, you have proven that you have physical access to your bank card.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:My Bank Has The Solution: Mother's Maiden Name by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      2) Authentication Questions: the ever popular list of ten questions about things that you did thirty-five years ago, or where there could be multiple possible answers. Where did you meet your spouse? (Which one?) What was the name of your childhood pet? (Again, which one?) What was your favourite TV show at age 13? (Damned if I know.) What was the Zip Code of your Grade Three elementary school?
        In other words, my money is secured through the use of a list of questions that any of my Facebook followers could find in about five minutes. Assuming that I ever put anything truthful on Facebook.

      Never use a truthful answer for those questions. Just use an extra password as the answer. Of course that doesn't solve the problem of 99% of people actually typing correct answers to those questions, getting hacked, and possibly compromising your information via information they have about you.

      Really, these security questions ought to be outlawed rather than required.

    4. Re:My Bank Has The Solution: Mother's Maiden Name by istartedi · · Score: 2

      True story--in order to get my California driver's license I needed a birth cert. A copy would not do. I had to go back to my place of birth and get a copy with a raised seal on it. This was not easy to do directly or quickly. An expediting service was the most reasonable way to do it. The expediting service used security questions to assure that it was really me. There were several questions. Most of them were easy. Then I came to... "which one of these is a phone number you used in the past 10 years". Oh crap. I don't know anybody's phone number now. It's "open list, select Jerry, dial". Jerry's number? Couldn't tell you to save my life. MY number? I never dial it of course. It used to be staring me in the face on my bill all those many years ago... until the bills became an automatic charge on my credit card... and I moved several times... into different area codes.

      I stared at the numbers. One looked familiar. I went with my gut. I was right; but I was sweating bullets.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  16. Re: Secure password vs keylogger. by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google and Facebook offer simple two-factor that works with any cellphone capable of SMS. Facebook also has a keygen built into their smartphone app. I wish everyone did this.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  17. Re:Yeah, they all require an email address by formfeed · · Score: 5, Informative

    > should we setup a separate email address at google for each vendor account we create?

    You don't already use an alias? username+vendor@gmail.com

    Surprising how many scripts tell you that this is not a valid email address.

  18. Re: Secure password vs keylogger. by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative

    The keygen would still work, plus Google will let you print out one-time use codes that you can keep in your wallet. I have had to use those before. Google will also let you set up a phone number that it will ring with the code - and naturally your desk phone at work sounds like a pretty good candidate.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  19. I'm not bad at guessing other people's passwords!! by schlachter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just have trouble finding the people whom they belong to.

    --
    My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
  20. Re:More conspiracy bullshit by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And how many ordinary companies making a routine purchase of seemingly ordinary keyboards test them in labs for key loggers?

    Commercial keyloggers (including devices like black market skimmers) can use GPRS cards, they can scout for open WiFi access points and transmit their payload once a day at 2:00 AM, or they can sit on a whole file waiting for a harvester to show up and retrieve the data via Bluetooth, 900 mHz, or some other wireless technology. The retrieval patterns are designed to evade detection.

    The only people investigating this stuff today are forensic investigators hired by people who are already victims, and independent security firms with nothing better to do.

    --
    John
  21. Re:Yeah, they all require an email address by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So - just one email account password to crack - right? Discard to the right of the + symbol in the user portion of your address, and we're done. Brilliant solution you've got there..I hope the world adopts it. I'm rather tired of earning legitimate income - I'd like to use yours'.

  22. Re: Secure password vs keylogger. by michelcolman · · Score: 2

    And you could turn it off without using 2FA?! Seriously?!

  23. Re:More conspiracy bullshit by plover · · Score: 2

    Actually, a few hundred PIN pads with built-in skimmers and GPRS modules were distributed around Europe a few years ago.

    --
    John