Slashdot Mirror


eBay Founder Pleads For Leniency For the PayPal 14

DavidGilbert99 writes "The founder of eBay, the parent company of PayPal, Pierre Omidyar has called on U.S. prosecutors to have mercy on the 14 members of Anonymous who are appearing in court this week facing up to 15 years in jail and a $500,000 fine for their part in a DDoS attack against PayPal in 2010. Despite thousands of Anons taking part, and most of the damage being done by two major botnets, the 14 are set to bear all the responsibility if U.S. prosecutors have their way."

9 of 225 comments (clear)

  1. Activism by Luthair · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its odd how online activism is treated much differently than that which occurs in meatspace. Many protests occur in real life where access to buildings or simply roads are blocked yet the treatment of the two types protestors is very different.

    1. Re:Activism by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a difference in views. People view blocking a street as free speech. They see people staging a sit-in as trying to raise awareness for their cause and the send a message.

      DDoS, on the other hand, they view as vandalism (unfathomably severe vandalism, if these prosecutors are to be believed).

      Objectively, I don't see much of a difference between a sit-in and a DDoS but that might just be because I understand what a DDoS is. Most people don't.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    2. Re:Activism by tysonedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To follow the analogy, "filling the streets with stuff" is illegal due to it's classification as littering and that effort needs to be undertaken to remove said litter.

      Once a DDoS attack is completed (assuming that the sole action taken was DDoS and not defacement or intrusion), there is nothing to "clean up". When you stop, everyone picks up their "stuff" and walks away.

      --
      Thirty four characters live here.
  2. Re:Fuck Them by PIBM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless 10 000 people spray paint a town one night. If you catch a few of them (14 ?) and you know they only took a spray can and shot a few seconds (they did almost nothing vs the botnets), would you charge them for cleaning up the whole town ?

  3. Re:Fuck Them by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I choose to pay someone $5.5 million to put up a "no trespassing" sign and a chain link fence after getting hit by vandals, that doesn't mean the vandals cost me $5.5MM

  4. Re:Fuck Them by N0Man74 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Spray painting a wall costs people time and money, and you know what, we don't drop fines that ruin peoples' lives over it.

    We have zero tolerance for making companies lose money... now when companies or banks make us lose money (or homes), it just shows the system works (the way they designed it).

  5. Re:Fuck Them by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is an easier real world analogy than the one GP picked. If there's a city-wide riot and the police only are able to arrest a few people, do those few people have to pay for all of the damage done during the riot?

    --
    The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
  6. Re:history in motion, transiting from hooliganism by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They all used Anons ddos app. It doesn't disguise your IP or anything. The point of it is, this is supposed to be a type of protest. I doubt there were any leaders in this case. 1 dude just pointed the application at the target and everyone else just ran the client for a few minutes. It's insane that this is illegal. This should be entirely a civil matter. Your ISP should ban you or you should be subject to a civil suit. But criminal charges? This is clearly a protest. Sounds like it was a hippie protest to me, and I hate hippies. But if we throw them in jail for bitching now, what's going to happen to all us non-hippies when we decide to bitch?

  7. Re:history in motion, transiting from hooliganism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No it would be awesome to live in a world where protesters would only be allowed to protest in a convenient place where they didn't bother anyone else. Maybe designated "free speech" zones where they won't disturb the rest of us who need to sleep, go to work, go shopping etc.

    Anyone who protested elsewhere and disturbed other people should get 15 years in jail and a $500,000 fine.

    What a wonderful "Black or White" world that would be right?